Sharing the TC HD without TM.

I'm using Time Capsule without Time Machine.
I would like to know if is possible to other computer [Mac or PC] already in my network, have the access to TC's HD? And the permission to see and share the files?
If yes, how?
thanks

Is my neighbor allowed to see the TC HD?
I'm using wap2 wi-fi.
Unless you provided your neighbor with the wireless encryption password that will NOT be able to access your wireless network nor "see" any wireless clients connected to it.
So, what about everyone = no access?
This would prevent everyone from actually accessing the TC's shared hard drive.
If I'll give the TC password, this previlege opens the HD too?
Again, you have three methods to grant access to the TC's hard drive:
o With Time Capsule password
o With a disk password, or
o With accounts
The "Time Capsule password" is the same as the TC's base station administrator's password, so yes, if you use this type of access, anyone connecting to the TC can also change its configuration. This, by the way, is the default setting.
The "disk password" is NOT the same as the TC's base station administrator's password. It is a separate and distinct from the administrator's password. All users accessing the disk have access to all files.
"With accounts" is NOT the same as the OS X or Windows user accounts. These are accounts that you can set up individual usernames & passwords, each with their own access privilege level (Read and Write, Read Only, or Not Allowed). This type of access is only available for HFS+ partitions.
Combined with any of these access types, you can set the Guest access level (Full Access, Read Only, or No Access).

Similar Messages

If I have an IPhone and my mother has an IPod, how can we share an iTunes account on a Mac without sharing the music?

If I have an IPhone and my mother has an IPod, how can we share an iTunes account on a Mac without sharing the music?

Have a read here...
https://discussions.apple.com/message/18409815?ac_cid=ha
And See Here...
How to Use Multiple iDevices with One Computer

2 Mac's sharing the same itunes library?

2 Mac’s sharing the same itunes library?
I would like to use the same existing itunes music folder I have on a external drive, connected to one of my machines?
I can share without any problem the drive from my laptop and can share/view the other machines itunes music through itunes on my laptop, but can not set the music folder on my laptops Itunes to be the same as on the machine that the external drive is connected to.
I have heard and seen this operation before but how do I do it ?

You lost me on which machine is which and where the library is stored. If the library is on an external drive connected to Computer 1 and you want to access it on Computer 2 then:
1. Connect to computer 1 using the Finder on Computer 2 and mount the external drive
2. Open iTunes on Computer 2
3. Select iTunes -> Preferences
4. Select the Advanced tab
5. Select Change next to iTunes Music Folder Location
6. Navigate to the folder where the music is stored.
7. Quit iTunes
8. Open iTunes with the OPTION key held down.
9. When prompted navigate to the Library file on Computer 1.
That should do it. As always, back up the Library file before you start this process. I would also recommend you back it up regularly as if you have a network issue while accessing the library file remotely, it could corrupt it.

Have a company based itunes account, trying to share itunes on bank owned devices. can't get all devices to keep our shared password on them without requesting user to enter password (which i am not giving them)

i am an IT manager for a bank. we have several company owned iphones. WE have also implemented a mobile device management system to manage our iphones.
We setup acompany based itunes account, trying to share itunes on bank owned devices. This way i can add bank approved apps to the devices through our itunes account and push out to the iphones, and no one can download any other non bank approved apps.
it has been working ok. but recently i had one user who came in. He went to enter in his itunes account on the phone and didn't work. So then came back and my staff and myself have (as much as we can see) removed his email account itunes login from all sections in settings. and entered in our itunes account information, but when you go to the app store, and hit upgrade, it still shows his email account for itunes. I feel like i can't get all devices to keep our shared password on them without requesting user to enter password (which i am not giving them)
How can i troubleshoot his device. i tried changing password 5 times today, rebooted device, and no change.
Jenn McGlynn

i have an MDM application, and i push out the apps i want them to have with our IT apple id account. for some reason when two approved apps needed updating last week, they prompted him for our password. (which i told him to bring phone in and i would enter password).
but somehow he went to try to enter his personal to make it work (don't know why)
somewhere it's keeping his personal email. i went into itunes/apps and our apple id is in there.
there is nothing in icloud b/c we do not allow icloud, so that's clear.

I cannot install an application in the Applications folder without removing it first

For some time now, I have noticed that I cannot install an application into the application folder without first removing it from the folder. If I try to install it by dragging the icon to the application folder, I get a warning that the application can't be moved because the folder "Applications" can't be modified. I click on authenticate and enter the root username and password. I am warned that the application already exists in the location. I am asked if I want to replace the item. The options presented are "Keep both files", "Stop", and "Replace". I choose "Replace". I am then prompted for an administrator's name and password. I enter "root" and the root password. I then get this lengthy error message:
The operation can’t be completed because some items had to be skipped. For each item, choose File > Get Info, make sure “Locked” is deselected, and then check the Sharing & Permissions section. When you are sure the items are unlocked and not designated as Read Only or No Access, try again.
I checked the permissions and "locked" was already deselected. The permissions grant my regular user read and write permissions, "staff" read-only, and "everyone" read-only. If I add "admin" with read and write permissions, nothing changes, i.e. I get the same error. If I try to enter my user credentials, they are rejected. My user is not an admin user. Previously, when I enterered the root username and password, the operation would complete successfully.
Now if I first remove the application from the Applications folder, then drag the application to the folder, I am prompted for an administrator's name and password. When I enter it, the application is copied successfully.
I have tried fixing file and directory permissions from the disk utility, but that doesn't fix the problem.

When you say, "locked" was already deselected, I take it that you mean the small icon at the bottom right of the Get Info window displayed an open lock picture.
Have you tried locking it, then unlocking it again? I expect you will be able to lock it by simply clicking on the open lock icon, but to unlock it again you will need to supply an Admin password.
Odd that DU didn't fix it. That would be my first thought also. Suggest trying it again, if you haven't already done so.
Speaking of DU, have you verified your HDD?
My Applications folder permissions read -
System          Read and Write
admin           Read and Write
everyone      Read only
Message was edited by: El Deanio

Can somebody can tell me is CC for team can support to save the files in the local area without using the cloud ?

Can somebody can tell me is CC for team can support to save the files in the local area without using the cloud ?

The desktop applications are still installed on your computer, and the files are also saved on your computer.
Optionally you can upload files with a browser to https://creative.adobe.com/files, or sync up files using the file sync that is part of the Creative Cloud desktop application. The online file storage is private to you, no one else can see it your files.
If you do want to share your files there are two options:
You can Collaborate, which is sharing a folder with another Adobe ID. Only the person you collaborate with can see the folder.
You can use Send Link to send a publicly accessible url to a file or folder.

Sharing the Library with others - conflicts?

If I store my iTunes media on a network attached storage drive (NAS) and rather than sharing it via my iTunes, different computers use it directly, does this cause any conflicts?

If by "use it directly" you mean different users using the same iTunes Library file (the essential directory file that defines what an iTunes library is), then be aware that only one user can access a particular iTunes Library file at a time. So, there can be no conflict.
If you mean that different users would rely on their own iTunes Library file and that these library files would call on the same folder of music files, then there is a possibility of a conflict in the sense of things like one user deleting a music file that other users expect to remain in their libraries. However, all users could operate their separate library files at the same time without any problem.

Does sharing the iPhoto library really work?

Does sharing the iPhoto library really work?

Yes I've used both apps to open the same library and it has worked. There are some things in each library that do not carry over, books for one and I'm not sure about slide shows.
But the basic functionality works in both programs on the same library. Having wrote that I still believe in the advice we always gave out to new users before this recent change, when the library was not readable by both programs.
That advice was to pick one program and use that one exclusively. Before the recent change the reason for this was more obvious but now that the library can be read by both programs why stick to one? One reason is comfort. Both programs while doing basically the same task do it just differently enough that switching between the two will be confusing. And when you are confused you are more likely to make mistakes. And mistakes in this case lead to image loss.
Second Aperture is a fairly complex program and will require some time to learn it and use it well. If you're switching back and forth the time to learn it will be increased and you may never really get everything out of it.
I think the great benefit of this recent change is that one it makes it a lot easier to migrate to Aperture, two if for some reason you decide that Aperture isn;t right for you there is no problem going back to iPhoto (in the past this was not possible without a great deal of effort and even then data would be lost) and three if other people in your household need to access the images in the library occasionally they can use the simpler iPhoto interface to do this.
So my advice is stiil the same as it was before, pick one of the applications, Aperture or iPhoto, and make that your primary tool. In the long run you'll be better off.
regards
PS in regards to the RAM question, 4gb will work but you'll be happier with 8gb
good luck

Can you disable the SSID broadcast without turning off WIFI?

Is there a way to disable the SSID broadcast without disabling WIFI altogether? Prior to the 4.3 IOS upgrade I could keep my WIFI enabled and when at home, the phone would automatically switch to my hi speed WIFI. The new upgrade now turns your phone into a WIFI/MYFI hotspot and broadcasts your phones SSID to the world.
Message was edited by: KevInFWB

KevInFWB wrote:
The new upgrade now turns your phone into a WIFI/MYFI hotspot and broadcasts your phones SSID to the world.
Message was edited by: KevInFWB
Only if you have enabled and setup personal hotspot settings in your network settings, AND have the hotspot conneciton active AND are sharing the hotspot connection via wifi.
If you do not have Personal Hotspot features enabled or active, your iPhone is not broadcasting any network connection ID information, with or without wifi enabled.
P.S. according to the iOS release notes, even if you leave Hotspot active, it will stop broadcasting the SSID after a timeour with no connections, since the HotSpot feature turns off after a short timeout with no activity.

Is it possible to turn off the infrared emitter without closing the sensor

Hi,
The Kinect v1 SDK had a function ForceInfraredEmitterOff(), which could be called to turn off the infrared emitter without having to close the Kinect. This was very useful for applications using multiple Kinects as it provided an easy way of preventing interference.
I am using 3 kinects with overlapping field of views to create a large field of view for a project and I would like to be able to control the infrared emitter like I did with the v1.
I looked in the SDK documentation and on the web, but found no method that could do what I want. So, did I miss something ?
Thanks.

That is exactly what it means: to have a system using two Kinects you will need two computers with two Windows 8 licenses (one each), one communication path between these computers (TCP/IP seems like an obvious choice) and some way to make sure they don't
interfere each other...
As far as Carmine answer goes, it is not satisfactory: OK, I understand that my Kinect is shared by all the applications running on my computer .... MY computer, meaning that I know which applications need the sensor and which ones don't (unless some unknown
background program is spying on me.... wouldn't want to shut off the IR to prevent that program from working now...)
So, why not give programmers a way to shut off the IR and if someone runs many programs on the same computer and does not want to shut off the IR then they just don't call that function ... this way everyone is happy.
SO, in the end here is the solution my company decided to implement: we used to put 3 kinects on each of our system to have a very wide field of view. This year we plan on selling about 75 of these systems, that would have meant buying 225 Kinects. Now,
since we can't turn off the IR (a functionality that would take any programmer about 10 minutes to implement by the way), we will buy only 75 Kinects (one per system) and mount them on a linear axis. It is acutally going to cost less money to buy one linear
axis and move the camera instead of buying 3 cameras with 3 computers with 3 windows licenses and developping some sort of anti-interference solution.

Using the TimeCapsule disk without internet

Hi!
We have a wireless setup with the main provider being an Airport Extreme (connected to the router) and and Airport Express (n) that extends the signal. We have however also a 1TB timecapsule directly connected to two different macs. Can we use the Timecapsule disk without being connected to the wireless spot (airport extreme). In some cases the Airport Extreme goes down and doing so it also drags the TC downs with it. We just want to use the TC as a shared disk connected to two/three computers via the ethernet ports on the TC. How can we do this? When we turn of the wireless the TC disk does not show up and the TC goes yellow...Im posting a screenshot (Norwegian). Hope someone understands what we are trying to achieve:
http://bildr.no/view/311772
Many thanks in advance!
Tom - Norway

I think you can just go to the wireless tab and turn it off in wireless mode. It should continue to work fine over ethernet. You won't be able to control it from a wireless computer then unless you have the ethernet tied to one of your other ports.
Here's what I would do. Set up the TC in "bridge" mode. This way, all ports then become ethernet switch ports (no WAN-LAN) function. Turn the wifi off. Then connect an ethernet cable from the Airport Extreme BS to the TC. Then you'll be able to see the TC from any wireless connected computer but if the WiFi network goes down then you'll be OK.

Lag/computer is slow when sharing the screen durin...

Hi everyone. I have a question. (New here on the forum so hope I'm doing this correctly)
Me and my friend often have a Skype Call where one shares the screen. (One plays a game while the other one watches.) However, whenever I share the screen, there is this immense lag for me, making it pretty hard to do anything while screen sharing. Even when I simply browse the internet with nothing else but the screen sharing open makes my computer really slow. My computer is fast without screen sharing.
The funny thing is that everything else in Skype works just fine. When I simply chat or when I'm calling someone without the screen sharing, my computer just works great and fast. And whenever my friend is the one sharing the screen with me, she is experiencing no lag at all. It's just when I share my screen there's lots of lag.
So I was wondering what the problem here could be. The connection between us seems good enough. After all, regular calls are just fine. Does anyone know what the problem could be and how to fix it? Thanks a lot.

@AutoRepairMedia, Can you please reproduce the issue and provide logs as described in this link https://support.skype.com/en/faq/FA12321/how-do-i-create-log-files under Skype for Windows Desktop and attach it to your post?
Can you also try to share only a smaller window since if you are sending a high resolution contect, it is quite cpu heavy to encode such a video.
Thank you

View data in client B from client A in the same SID without a valid logon?

Hi Folks
We are planning on upgrading our 4.6C system to ERP 6.0, and are initialy considering having two clients in the same sandbox SID. One would be for the developers to perform code remediation checks (client A), and one would contain a copy of production data for performing testing of functionality over live data (client B).
Would it be possible to view data in client B from client A in the same system without a valid logon to client B or RFC connection to client B from client A? For example via the use on an ABAP program to SQL the database?
I know one can use transactions like SM30/SM31 to view, compare, and adjust data between clients, but this requires an RFC connection and valid logon to the target client.
Regards
Kevin.

Hi Kevin.
>
Kevin McLatchie wrote:
> Would it be possible to view data in client B from client A in the same system without a valid logon to client B or RFC connection to client B from client A? For example via the use on an ABAP program to
Short answer: yes.
If someone has the right to write and execute ABAP reports on the system he is able to access the data of all clients. So I don't think that this setup is advisable. Don't mix development and production data in one system.
Best regards,
Jan

How do I restore the "close tab" button to the END of the tab bar, WITHOUT USING AN ADDON

Up until FF31, I used to have the following setting configured which moved the little 'X' button that closed tabs off of the tabs themselvs and onto the far right of the tab bar.
browser.tabs.closeButtons; User Set; Integer; 3
No, this no longer works. It has still moved the close buttons back to the tab buttons. Until I can figure out how to fix this, I will be moving back to a previous version. I can't for the life of me see why this feature was removed, other than Mozilla's seemingly arrogant insistence that it knows what people want better than they do.
I was since told by someone that I can use an addon to fix it, yet the problem is THEY DO NOT WORK. The addons that supposedly solve this all have intermittent failures where they don't load correctly, leave random dead tabs open, and in one case it even seemed to open new tabs when I tried to close one.
It's absolutely inexcusable that the dev team is so arrogant to take away a feature that has fundamentally no impact on the rest of the browser, other than, as I said before, they THINK they know what we want better than we do. It's no small wonder that FF is losing market share. The only thing keeping me on board was really this function, as I prefer this layout, and if it's gone, I see no reason to stick with FF over others.

unfortunately it is not possible to restore the close button to have only one (customizable) close button on the Tab bar without using an extension.
The extension is necessary because you need to create a new toolbar button and bind the proper code to it to make the button act as a tab close button (command: BrowserCloseTabOrWindow()).
*tabs closebutton restored: https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/tabs-closebutton-restored/
* http://cat-in-136.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/note-do-same-without.html

I am using a mac mini 2011 an 3gs i phone 2010 macbook white 2008 and a new 2013 apple tv box. When i check info on the cloud I get 'upgrade your operating system to the latest. My question is is it possible to use the icloud system without an upgrade

I am using a mac mini 2011 an 3gs i phone 2010 macbook white 2008 and a new 2013 apple tv box. When i check info on the cloud I get 'upgrade your operating system to the latest. My question is is it possible to use the icloud system without an upgrade

iCloud requires OS X 10.7.2.

Sharing the TC HD without TM.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for