Sharpness adjustment

After opening a photo, I click on "adjust" link. Most functions seem to work fine except when I click on "sharpness". I make sharpness corrections, then click on done...there is a message saying "changes are being saved"...but...the photo seems to revert back to the original focus. Am I overlooking something?
Thanks in advance,
Lenny.

HI Lenny,
Let me point you to these Apple kbs...
Working with iPhoto sharpness tool
Adjusting the sharpness of a photo
iPhoto: sharpness adjustment may not be apparent when viewing at less than 100 percent

Similar Messages

  • Sharpness adjustment won't save

    When I open photo in Edit, open the Adjustment panel, use the sharpness control and hit done, it says it is saving changes. However, when I reopen the photo it appears to have reverted to the way it was prior to me adjusting the sharpness control. Also, once you have made adjustments, do the sliders maintain that position whenever you open that photo?

    Hi Marcie,
    check out this Apple kb and see if the info in it helps?
    Working with iPhoto sharpness tool
    Adjusting the sharpness of a photo
    iPhoto: sharpness adjustment may not be apparent when viewing at less than 100 percent
    About your last question, I am not sure. I never use the sharpness adjustment.

  • New to Mac: help me adjust my Windows workflow to iPhoto

    I recently switched to Mac, mostly in the hopes of spending less time thinking about how the computer works and more time doing what I want to do.
    In fact, what made me finally start seriously thinking about a Mac is when I heard about the iPhoto '08 events feature, where it automatically split the photos based on the dates. I thought that was genius in how simple, yet effective it was.
    I take quite a few photos. I take a lot of random photos of my car (I'm a car guy), but I also take some photos at parties, friend visits and family visits, etc. I often take several of photos of the same thing, because, heck, there's plenty of space on the memory card, and maybe one of the subsequent photos will be better than the first.
    One common scenario for me is going to a social gathering of some kind and then posting the photos of that event online.
    My Windows XP workflow used to be as follows:
    1. Connect camera
    2. Import photos into a folder named after the event using Windows Photo import. If several different events, select several sets and import them separately into separate folders. E.g. "My Pictures\Spring Cleaning Day Apr 2008"
    3. Browse the photos using Windows File Viewer and delete any obviously poor photos and select the least blurry of several duplicates.
    So that above is fairly straighforward. Now, I need to get these photos up online. A while back, I set up for myself a website that runs Gallery 1.x software, so I could just upload photos via a web interface and have them viewable with automatic thumbnails.
    The thing is: I don't want to upload ALL images online. Just most of them (the best).
    4. Open the photos I'm interested in a photo editor, one by one.
    5. Crop, adjust levels, shadows, colors, etc.
    6. Resize photo to a "large but not too large" web size, usually either 1200 or 1400 pixels wide.
    7. Adjust sharpness on the resized photo to make sure it looks good when viewed at actual pixel size.
    8. Save photo in a subfolder called "forweb", e.g. My Pictures\Spring Cleaning Day Apr 2008\forweb. This way, I get to keep all the originals from the camera and my resized web-ready photos separate.
    9. Upload all photos from the "forweb" folder using a web interface, typing up descriptions for each.
    When I'm done, I have a gallery that has thumbnails, mid-size versions of the photos (800 pixels wide, for easy viewing) and a "full-size" version for a detailed view (but not as huge as the one that came out of the camera... so it's not original size). In fact, the original size photos are huge (as I take them at 7.1MP resolution with the lowest compression), about 2-3MB each, and so I'd never want to upload a 100 3MB photos. A waste of space.
    Overall, the result is pretty good: most people view the midsize photos and save full-size (1200 or 1400 pix wide) photos of things they particularly like.
    However, the process is too time consuming. In particular, it takes forever to go through each photo and resize it and crop it. The process of resizing and saving each individual photo in the separate "forweb" is quite a bit of overhead. Sometimes I kind of dread having to post photos up online after events, and it should totally not be that way!
    I bought a .Mac subscription after seeing the fancy web galleries. I am hoping that the combination of iPhoto and .Mac can help me get my photos up on the web quicker.
    So now, the iPhoto workflow. What should it be?
    Here's my guess:
    1. Connect camera.
    2. Import all photos, naming each event after importing.
    3. Delete poor photos or blurry duplicates.
    4. Identify photos I want to display on the gallery (those worth keeping) and hide all others.
    5. Crop and adjust shadows/colors/etc.
    6. Select "Web gallery" to share the event.
    And then I'm done.
    So that sounds pretty good right there. Except, I have several reservations and questions:
    1. Is it better to mark photos I don't want in the web gallery as hidden (so I can just upload the entire gallery) or should I just select the photos I want to upload online into the web gallery? It seems to work either way. On one hand, it seems better to hide the photos, because then when they get synced to my iPhone, I have the most relevant photos and not the "extras." Also, if I'm showing photos from my laptop, I'm also showing the cream of the crop and not everything. On the other hand, the concept of hiding photos is kind of unusual to me. Feels strange to "hide" photos.
    2. What to do for a web gallery full size that's not as huge as the original camera size? When uploading to .Mac, I only have an option of Optimized or Actual Size. Optimized size is 1024 pixels wide. That's too small for a detailed views or for wallpaper purposes. The problem is that the "Actual Size" from my camera is huge (~3000 pixels wide). I don't really want to burden people with the downloading of the 2-3MB "Actual Size."
    However, it seems that it's tricky to implement such a 1200-1400-pixel-wide "full size" with iPhoto. There is no resize option within iPhoto that I could find. The best I could find was a crop with a constrain size option. I guess I would have to constrain-size crop to something like 1400x1000 first? And then crop again to get the shape I want?
    Also, sharpness adjustment seems useless when adjusting 7MP photos. In my Windows workflow, I found sharpness much more useful when tweaking photos after they have been resized to this "full-size" 1200-1400 wide resolution. This again means that I'd have to do the crop "trick". It feels strange though that everything else is so straighforward, but resizing photos within iPhoto isn't.
    I guess that's where the whole workflow question is. The iPhoto workflow is to keep your originals intact and maintain adjusted duplicates. But resizing is not a suggested part of this workflow--instead, it is expected that any resizing is done on the way "out" of the library (e.g. File->Export or web gallery publishing).
    I wish I could introduce an intermediate "optimized" setting for Web Gallery upload (although then I don't have that precise control of sharpness after resizing).
    Maybe I am overthinking this and, given that I have 10GB of storage space with .Mac, I should just give up and let it upload my 3000-pix wide 2-3MB JPG originals (i.e. use the "actual size" setting)?
    3. Can anyone provide some practical uses for the "albums" setting and contrast their use vs events? I just want to get a better insight into the practical difference. It seems that albums are not very useful or rather would be rarely used, given the main categorization of all photos into events. It seems that the only use for albums would be to bring together photos across different events. For example, I could make an album of all of the photos of my car's odometer or put together my best random city shots. Maybe I just answered my own question? Still, interested into your use of albums.

    ilp
    Welcome to the Apple Discussions.
    So now, the iPhoto workflow. What should it be?
    This is pretty good:
    1. Connect camera.
    2. Import all photos, naming each event after importing.
    3. Delete poor photos or blurry duplicates.
    4. Identify photos I want to display on the gallery (those worth keeping) and hide all others.
    Well I would make a small change here. There are reports of folks getting hidden photos turning up in their web galleries. So, instead I would flag the photos I want to upload and then create an ALBUM from them. (or you can just drag and drop them to an album) Also, you can add to your gallery simply by adding to the album. Or use Ratings and/or keywords, see below
    5. Crop and adjust shadows/colors/etc.
    6. Select "Web gallery" to share the event.
    (or Album)
    You cannot change the size of images that are in the Gallery. It's a flash based "movie". Those size options refer to the file size of images that you allow folks to download from the gallery.
    Events are a really limited way of organising your pics. Events in the iPhoto Window correspond exactly with the Folders in the Originals Folder in the iPhoto Library package file (Right click on it in the Pictures Folder -> Show Package Contents).
    You can move photos between Events, you can rename Events, edit them, create them, as long as you do it via the iPhoto Window. Check out the Info Pane (wee 'i', lower left) the name and date fields are editable. Edit a Event Name using the Info Pane, the Event Folder in iPhoto Library/Originals will also have the new name.
    That's it.
    Albums can be based on any criteria you can think of - and with Smart Albums this can be done automatically.
    For instance, back in your work flow above, you sort the pic and hide the one's you don't want to upload. Here's another way of doing it. Rate the pics, from 1 - 5, and then
    File -> New Smart Album
    Rating -> Is -> 5 stars
    will find your favourites. Best yet, it will update that album every time you rate new pics. You can base Smart Albums on a lot of criteria - date, rating, keyword, camera model... have a look and see the full list, and these can be combined together...
    The other great plus with Albums is that, because they are virtual, a pic can be in 1, 10 or 100 albums with no wasted disk space. But if a pic is in more than one Event you're dealing with a duplicate file.
    Frankly, a Event is a bucket of Pics, and Album is a coherent organisation based on any criteria you can think of.
    Regards
    TD

  • Problem with sharpness

    I am trying to edit many of my photos but have encountered a problem.
    When I double click the photo it opens in the edit window. Then I click on the double >> and the adjust window opens. One of the sliders is for sharpness and when I slide that to the right it is very obvious the photo gets sharper. Then I click done and a little window drops down that says "saving changes". However, if I watch carefully I can see that just before the window closes the photo goes back "out of focus".
    Anyone have any idea what is going on and how I get the photo to stay "sharpened"?
    Thanks
    Dave

    David:
    Have you tried viewing the "sharpened" image at full size? See Sharpness adjustment not apparent when viewed at less than 100%.

  • Why do I loose sharpness when I export out of Aperture?

    My images look almost blurred once exported out of Aperture 3.0.  !  I am finding in my reading that others have been having this problem for years!  Has Apple not fixed this yet?  I may have to go to Photoshop, but really don't want to!!!

    That doesn't sound right at all. My exports looks fine. I wonder if it could be some kind of glitch or something...
    Just out of curiosity, what do your export preferences look like? What quality setting do you have for jpegs, and what dpi for external editor file format? How about the dpi in your export presets you've been using? How about your RAW Fine Tuning sharpness sliders? (although that would affect how your images appear in Aperture, although it is subtle)
    Aperture has limited (but effective) sharpening options, and by default rendering the images are softer than what you might be used to if you used to process your RAW images with ACR (Photoshop, Lightroom). But I was able to match the default ACR rendering (in terms of sharpness, I mean) with Aperture by maxing out the sharpness sliders in RAW Fine Tuning and applying a Sharpen Edges adjustment with only mildly aggressive sharpening.
    Oh, that reminds me, which sharpness adjustment are you using? Sharpen is from the previous versions of Aperture, and is included for legacy/compatibility purposes with images that were processed in Aperture 1 & 2. Sharpen Edges is much more advanced and is generally recommended over the other.
    Doug

  • Iphoto adjustment

    Hi,
    When I attempt to use the sharpness adjustment in adjust it responds OK but I cannot save it, it reverts back to the original condition when I press done or attempt to save it any other way. Any ideas?
    cheers....Trevor

    Trevor
    Someone else posted this question about a year ago. Try searching the forum using the search term "adjust" or maybe "sharp". Be sure to search the forum for the past year!
    Dave

  • Sharpness of NEF raw conversion for landscape photo is poor compared to ViewNX raw conversion

    Raw conversion in ViewNX is far sharper than Aperture for some photos, enough so to differentiate as usable or unusable images. I tried adjusting sharpness and edges sliders in "RAW Fine Tuning" adjustments but even at maximum is terribly blurry compared to default ViewNX raw conversion. Overall color and dynamic range seem better in ViewNX for landscape shots but not critical like the blurriness... the difference is profound so I think I'm doing something wrong or the 3.2 update may have a serious bug. Anyone else have thisissue?
    Aperture 3.2:
    ViewNX:

    I was talking with some others in another forum and someone suggested ViewNX may be automatically applying settings from camera default picture settings. So I just checked and in
    menu->shooting menu->set picture control
    (Nikon D90)
    the standard "SD" setting is set to sharpen value 7 on a scale of 0-9.  Sounds like ViewNX is reading that value and applying some very strong sharpening in software on the raw image. However, I'd expect to set the Aperture RAW fine tune sharping adjustment to 100% and get reasonable close to similar sharpness. At this point I think I understand the issue but I also feel that ViewNX is much better able to sharpen the RAW image while introducing less unwanted artifacts.  It's a pretty significant point and I'd be quite happy to see improvement in sharpness from Aperture RAW conversion of NEF files.
    I don't suppose there is any way I can configure Aperture to use the Nikon RAW converter? I'd love to have the option to choose or switch back and forth depending on the picture and results. There are times I prefer Apertures converter to Nikons.

  • New 2010 Mac Mini and LG 37" Full HD (via HDMI) query..

    Hello all! I have just bought the new Mac Mini which I want to use along with my LG 37" (LH5000) full HD LCD TV.I have hooked them both up together via HDMI. When I first turned the Mac Mini on it detected various resolutions and choose 1080p. However, on this resolution the menu bar, dock finder windows etc all look too small when im sitting on the couch. Im only around 3 metres away from the TV.
    Ive changed various resolutions, in fact the 720p resolution looks bigger and better....but surely I should be using 1080p? I was wondering if any one else out there has a similar setup and what res you would recommend I should use? There are other resolutions but I assume the other ones are all Mac (computer LCD) base.
    Thanks in advance
    Ben

    Yes, this is a significant issue. And since Apple doesn't allow adjustment of type sizes throughout the OS, it can be very problematic.
    One solution is to do as you have done and run the display at a lower resolution.
    Another solution is to use the magnification tools that are provided in the Universal Access control panel (system preferences).
    Screen zoom works with any scroll mouse (you do not need to buy the MS mouse that was mentioned). Just hold the Control key on the keyboard and turn the mouse's scroll wheel. I use this a lot on my Mini connected to an HDTV.
    I also have the size of the mouse pointer arrow increased twofold using the universal access controls.
    In the Finder, you can set the Finder preferences so that file names are listed as 16 point type (and click on the set default button). Of course the menus and sidebars are still small and Apple really needs to start offering more versatile adjustments for these other interface areas (like, dare I say it… Windows allows for).
    When web browsing, you can magnify the web page in question using the COMMAND key with the + key. You can zoom back again using COMMAND and - . I use that a lot. And yes this shortcut key combo works in both Safari and Firefox.
    Lastly, make sure that the sharpness adjustment on your TV isn't turned up significantly, as this will hurt the legibility of type on the screen. The lower the sharpness is set, the more readable the text will be. You'll have to strike a balance that you're happy with between text sharpness and a satisfying sharpness for the video content you watch. On my sony tv, I have the sharpness set at about 25%.
    I should also mention that the type on the screen being to small to read is a sign that your screen size to seating distance ratio is outside of the ideal range. In other words, you're sitting too far from your current TV, or you could stand to have a bigger TV for the room in question. To better understand viewing distance versus HD display size, read this:
    http://www.crutchfield.com/S-L3GoEoljGNL/learn/learningcenter/home/TV_placement. html

  • Can't get h264 footage to import, only audio?

    I'm brand new to Premiere. I have a simple project to edit and thought it would be perfect to get my hands dirty in CS6.
    Unfortunately, I've already run into some problems.
    • I can't import any h264 footage. I primarily shoot on a Canon 7d, and have a lot of 1920 x 1080 h264s. I was hoping to edit natively, as this is one of Premiere's selling points -- but when I import the footage, it shows it as an ".mov" file, yet no video plays, only audio. In fact, it won't even display a frame rate for the video -- rather than reading 23.976 like it should, it reads "48000 Hz". Why is it only reading the audio?
    These files play normally in quicktime.
    Any help?
    Separate question, but regarding the same project.
    This footage was shot in 24 fps, but just looked at final export requirements and I'll need it in 30 fps.
    • Should I edit in 24 fps, and then try to somehow convert to 30? How?
    • Should I edit in a 24 fps or a 30 fps sequence?
    • What options do I have with 3:2 pulldown vs compression?
    • Any recommendations of what point in the process i need to do a conversion or compression.
    Again, I'm working in Cs6 on a Mac.
    Let me know any other questions regarding specs.
    Thanks!
    Jennie

    Hi katevers34 - welcome to the forum!
    I have found that giving those portrait pics a very minor edit in Photoshop has fixed the problem - any adjustment at all, perhaps a slight colour shift. Now you may not have Photoshop, but doing the same thing in iPhoto would most likely suffice as well. I'm sure that in iPhoto you could select all of those pics (Command-Click on each one) and in the Edit > Adjust window, make a minor change to them all in one action e.g. a tiny sharpness adjustment.
    Post back if it doesn't work for you.

  • Photo quality worse when viewed on a PC -- why?

    I'm experiencing a strange issue with some photos that I've touched up in iPhoto. When viewing the photos in iPhoto, they look fine. When exported into a different folder and viewed in Preview, they look fine. But later on I tried opening up the same exported files (jpeg's) on a PC, and some of them looked horrible. Some were horrendously noisy. Some had colors that seemed off. Some were far too sharp (I was playing around with the sharpness adjuster in iPhoto).
    Has anyone experienced this issue before, and does anyone know why this happened? I plan on simply going back and toning down some of my edits/adjustments, but I'd like to know if there's an explanation for this.
    One odd thing I noticed just now is that when opening some of these "bad" jpegs in Preview, for a split second, the photos look like they did on my PC. For example, I could see the pixel noise in one of them for a split second... similar to the way iPhoto first displays a blurry enlargement when double clicking on a photo. It almost seems like Preview and iPhoto are self-correcting bad images for display. Thoughts?

    The primary cause of the misalignment is the fact the text is using a "Web Safe" font. A "web safe" font is not a single font. Rather it's a list/stack of fonts for the site visitor's browser to try until it finds one that's available the visitor's computer. That means on one computer the text is in one font (i.e. Arial) and on another computer it's another (i.e. Helvetica) with the subsequent fallout caused by the varying character widths between the two fonts. The best way to reduce this variation between site viewers is to use a Web Font (either an Edge Web Font or a Self-Hosted Web Font).
    The alignment still won't be entirely consistent across browsers (or even versions of browsers), because each browser has it's own text layout engine and the engines do sometime change, but the variation will be radically reduced.

  • How to view an image @ 100% ?

    When I do some editing in iPhoto, especially sharpening, I'd like to see it @100%.
    There is no indication at what % I'm viewing the image.
    Is there any way to know that ?
    When clicking "edit" on the bottom, at what size the image opens?
    Thanks!

    ok, I found an Apple article from 2007 which explains how to do that. I'm posting it here for others:
    ===================================
    iPhoto: Sharpness adjustment may not be apparent when viewing at less than 100 percent
    Last Modified on: July 13, 2007
    Article: 301425
    When you view an image at less than full size, iPhoto smooths it (a technique known as anti-aliasing) to get rid of artifacts that result from scaling down the photo. The relationship between anti-aliasing and sharpening is a trade-off; although anti-aliasing does not modify the actual image file, it does counter the effect of sharpening when viewing the image at less than full size.
    Because of this, if you sharpen a photo, close it, then reopen it again at a less than 100-percent view, you may get the impression that your sharpness changes were not saved. In reality they were, but since the image has been re-aliased to fit your screen, the image's true sharpness may not be apparent.
    To evaluate whether an image is sharp or needs sharpening, you should view the photo at 100 percent/full size while editing in a separate window. To open the photo in a separate window, you can either Control-click the image and choose "Edit in a separate window" from the shortcut menu, or change your iPhoto preferences:
    From the iPhoto menu, choose Preferences.
    In the General pane, locate the preference for "Double-click photo."
    Set the radio button to "Opens photo in edit window."
    Close the preferences window.
    Now photos will open in a separate window when you double-click them. Once in the separate window, choose 100% from the Size pop-up menu. If you don't see the Size menu, widen the window until it appears.
    Tip: If you are editing the photo from one of the other view options, you can press the 1 key to quickly jump to 100 percent view.
    Other applications, such as Adobe Photoshop, handle anti-aliasing differently, so the degree of apparent sharpness can vary from one application to the next when viewing an image at a scaled-down size. You should see consistency when comparing the image at 100 percent across other applications.
    Important: Information about products not manufactured by Apple is provided for information purposes only, and does not constitute Apple's recommendation or endorsement. Please contact the vendor for additional information.
    ========================================

  • Problem with image after exporting from Lightroom 5

    Good day. Please can someone help me? I have Lightroom 5, and I have a problem in exporting edited images. At issue, do all the necessary settings and retreat noise and sharpness adjustment by brush adjustment tool, however, to export the image, noise and some minor adjustments are lost. Because in Lightroom visualize the way you wish, but after export, is not it the same? How do I get a different result? Thank you all!

    I have the same problem!
    Something got broken with my Lightroom 5.6 (Windows 7Pro)  two days ago and I don't see any adjustments made with brush after exporting photos!
    It's not a problem of library or RAW files - the same, work fine on other computers (iMac).
    I tried to clean the computer with CC Cleaner Tool, and install everything again, but it didn't help.
    I already lost 2 days trying to fix it, and I don't want to format the drive and install Windows again
    Can anyone help?

  • Edit in Photoshop command

    I am attempting to edit a file in lightroom 4 this is a tiff file generated from a scanned negative. If I adjust exposure and contrast and edit in photoshop(cs6) using the edit in photoshop command the file will open. If I then add a noise and sharpness adjustment the file will no longer open. If I return the noise and sharpness adjustments to zero the file will then open. Anyone have any idea what’s going on

    http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/401/kb401629.html
    Beat

  • Alternative to iPhoto?

    I just switched over from PC to Mac, and I'm looking for a program to replace iPhoto. I really liked Picasa for the PC and unfortunately they don't make a Mac version.
    Can anyone recommend something that is more user friendly and less buggy than iPhoto? I'm thinking about checking out Photoshop Elements but wanted to see if there are better programs out there. The main things I want to do are organize (with more flexibility than iPhoto allows), and touch-up photos (red eye, sharpness, color, contrast). Any recos?

    Kevin,
    1.You can get to the actual files through the finder, but it is difficult if you don't know the date they were created.
    iPhoto is meant to have everything done within the application.
    -If you want to use an image in another application you would Share/Export the photos to the desktop. You can then navigate to the desktop to use the photos (example: web uploading from online photo site)
    If your application supports drag and drop, you can drag the photo from an open iPhoto Library window into your application.
    For email you can also use the email icon within iPhoto to open a message with the highlighted photo attached.
    You can also use spotlight to find images in an Album...
    This is what I have done using Spotlight to find my images that are in iPhoto albums without opening iPhoto..
    In iPhoto, select the album, then select all, go to Photos/batch change.
    Change the comments to text. In the text field I put the name of the Album.
    Do this for each album.
    Close iPhoto.
    Open Spotlight and put in the name of the Album ( you have to remember the names of the albums or have then written down)
    In the spotlight search results. click on "show all"
    Under "Images" click on the "xx more" to show all the images in the album.
    Make sure you have it in icon view, the icon view box is the last one on the blue images line.
    Now you can control click on the image to "reveal in finder", open in iPhoto or Mail, etc.
    One important thing to know is you can set up a graphic program to be an external editor (when you double click an image in the library} such as PhotoShop or PS Elements. You set up that within iPhoto Preferences. Just make sure you save the image flattened and with the same name. The edits will then be relected in iPhoto when you hit "save".
    2. Maybe these apple kb articles might clarify what is happening.
    Working with iPhoto sharpness tool
    Adjusting the sharpness of a photo
    iPhoto: sharpness adjustment may not be apparent when viewing at less than 100 percent
    Lori

  • Soft focus in Iphoto '11?

    Hello I have a new MacBook Pro with OSX 10.8.2 and I downloaded iPhoto '11  (version 9.4.2).
    I want to do something that was very easy in older versions of iPhoto: to get a soft focus effect.  I want to get a slight blur, for a soft romantic portrait effect.
    The current version of iPhoto has an Sharpness adjustment slider.  But this slider will only increase sharpness.  I want to do the opposite.  I want to decrease the sharpness!
    Did Apple actually remove this useful feature from iPhoto?  In no, then where is it?  If yes, then my question is why remove something useful?
    Thanks,
    Peter Halverson
    PS:  I must say that the transition from OSX 10.4 (Tiger) to OSX 10.8 (Mountain Lion) has been very painful.  My most useful software had to be updated or re-purchased and much of it is simply not available.  I wish I could go back to the older OS.

    iPhoto 6 was the last verson of iPhoto to offer the Sharpness slider to go both ways, sharpen and soften. It still works with Mt. Lion.  So if you have the disks that came with your original Mac you can use   Pacifist on those disks to install iPhoto 6.  But you'll need a copy of your originla iPhoto 6 library to use or try to follow this  iPhoto Library Manager tutorial:  Fat Cat Software - iPhoto Library Manager Help - Downgrading a library to an earlier version of iPhoto.
    Personally I believe you would be ahead of the curve if you obtained a 3rd party image editor that had the softening capabilty and used it as the external editor from withing iPhoto. 
    OT

Maybe you are looking for