Shift wise process order confirmation
Hi Guru's
My client is asking about shift wise confirmation of process order.
wht r the step will I follow to maintian the desire requirement.
Please explain with example upto order confirmation, wht r the field to be check & wht should be the input I give the field.
If any body sent me the doc related to the problem
I'll be thankful to him.
My ID:- [email protected]
Parminder
Parminder,
Basically your shift definition is for capacity planning/scheduling in the desired way
Create a process order ,Hope you would have also maintained your recipe with timings
"<b>wheer the impact will be come of this configuration.either Process order creation or order confirmation</b> "
The proces order will be scheduled(<b>at the time of order creation</b>) as per the timings mentioned in the recipe & the shift definition in the resource
Then you do phase wise confirmation-Time ticket/Time event
As per your reply what i understand is that in 3 shifts your process order will get over
So your shift supervisor will confirm accordingly
Hope this is useful
Revert back if you have any further queries
Reward points if useful
Regards,
SVP
Message was edited by:
SVP
Similar Messages
-
BAPI For Process Order Confirmation
Hi,
For Process Order Confirmation we are using the following tcode. COR6N. in the t-code we are include a new field (Shift Field) with help of CONFPP07. and we made the field as mandatory also. in cor6n it is working fine.
now we are using the bapi for same Process Order Confirmation. here the new field is not available. we want to include the new ( Shift ) Field also. we are using the following
BAPI Fm: BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TT .
Regards
SathisBAPI_PRODORDCONF_CREATE_TT to confirm a production Order
Erwan -
Restriction during process order confirmation
Hi,
I want one validation during process order confirmation (mile stone) through t code COR6N if resource capacity & shift intervals not maintained ( t code CRC2) then process order should not confirmed & there should be error message. Plz advice how it is possible through customization.
regards,
sps.Dear shukla,
Check with this User Exit,
CONFPI02 Process order confirmation: Customer spec. input checks 1
CONFPI03 Process order conf.: Cust. spec. check after op. selection
CONFPI04 Process order conf.: Customer specific input checks 2
CONFPI05 Process order conf.: Cust. spec. enhancements when saving
If the above is not working then check with this BADI
WORKORDER_CONFIRM at the time of saving,
Regards
S Mangalraj -
Goods Issue- Process Order Confirmation
Hi,
During Process order confirmation, in Goods Movement tab the BOM components with qty are displayed. But some components OTHER than BOM items ISSUED for the process order is not displayed in the goods movement tab. Why?
Is there any additional configuation to be done?
Thanks....
JK
Edited by: J K on Apr 15, 2008 6:04 AMHi
As said by Mr sateesh,
If u r doing confirmation phase/operation wise(COR6), then the material assign to phase/operation is only seen according to phase/operation wise.so have to check in which phase u have confirm the component quanity.
or
If u confirm the process order collectively(CORK), then their must missing in OPK4 (confirmation Parameter) of All component tick at Goods Movement.
Kindly check the same & coem back if their is any other issue
Parminder -
Product Costing - Process Order Confirmation
Dear Experts,
We are facing a situation with our Product Costing Scenario :
Under SFG Process Order Confirmation, there are Ten Phases to finally confirm the order. First Phase is for Raw Material Issuance. From Second Phase to Ninth Phase are relevant to Activity Types. Tenth Phase which is final phase, in this point Goods Receipt posting is generated.
At first phase, system posts Raw Materials Goods Issue (Movt Type 261) to Process Order:
Entry : RM (Cr), Consumption (Dr).
Client needs the system to post one more entry at the same time by : WIP (Dr), Inv Change (Cr).
Reason:
According to client, they have made consumption entry in finance but what if all raw materials are not consumed as yet and factory comes under fire, then how can they claim insurance on those Raw Materials which are not consumed and are still in the IN PROCESSING Stage?
My Answer was:
- They can find all material costs in Process Order as Debit Item.
- They can also calculate WIP but cannot post WIP in Finance unless the order is settled.
Ultimately, as per my knowledge client cannot check the unprocessed Raw Materials report in FI but they can check in CO. And this is the point of reservation from client.
They need an entry in Finance for WIP to claim insurance in case of fire and therefore they need a posting of WIP entry immediately after Goods Issue of Raw Materials to Order.
Can anyone please guide me further regarding this scenario and if any one can suggest any work around then it would be highly appreciated!
Regards,
Zain BashirHi Zain
This is a very unusual question
Buddy, there is something in accounting called as "Going Concern Concept" which we all were taught in our accounting days.. That means when you do business, do it with a mindset that you are goinig to do it for long / for ever.. Accidents dont happen every day and you cant build a system around such things
Assume there is a fire (God forbid).. After the accident, you wont even know how much was lying there unconsumed which got gutted in the fire..
And insurances not just covers the stock lying consumed, but also stock manufactured and stock in the process of manufacturing (WIP)
And most importantly, dont expect SAP to throw up a figure at the click of a button.. Does your client really think that they will simply submit the report generated from SAP as-is to Insurance people?? SAP is just a technology enablement, which requires human intervention at various places
My opinion - Dont build system for such requirements
Br. Ajay M -
Problem with creating Process order confirmation using BAPI
Hello,
While creating Process Order confirmation using BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TT, material document is getting created. But a line item is inserted in the table AFRU without material document number. When it is created manually using the transaction COR6, the table is getting updated with material doc in the line item. Can anyone let me know what other attributes to be passed in order the update the same?
Thanks in Advance.
Regards, Senthil G.Hello , I am working with the same Bapi, can you please send me the code to fill the parameters, if I find the same error like you, I will send you the solution if I correct that.
Thanks for your help.
[email protected]
Guatemala, Cempro ADATSA -
Problem during Process Order Confirmation - COR6N
Dear All,
We are into process industries
Till now we are creating different BOM for each section and different process orders for each BOM.
For example Pulverize, Acid MIXING, Continuous Rotery, Blending and Packng.
Now we have created new BOM for FG - showing all input/output of RM, SFGs. In Recipe, define operation for each section. and assign operation to material. I have attached screenshot of Recipe Operation.
During process order confirmation, system shows movement type of all material perfectly during each phase. But during confirmation of last phase system does not show 101 movemet of FGs.
I have checked in Recipe, control key is ok i.e. Automatic GR, in OPK4 setup is also correct.
We have created new BOM and Recipe. There is no change in other configuration parameter.
Thanks and Regards,
NiravHi Nirav
The automatic goods receipt is defined by the operation/phase control key.
Control key PI03 has the automatic goods receipt setting by defaul.
Analyzing the screenshot I could observe that this control key is assigned to all the opration/phases, however, it should only be assigned to the last operation/phase, where the goods receipt will actually take place.
For all the previous operations/phases you should use a different control key, without automatic goods receipt, such as PI01.
BR
Caetano -
Update Process Order Confirmations Back to SAP ECC
Hi,
Is there a document or step by step guide which explains how i can update SAP EARP with process order confirmations from my shopfloor? Below is the scenario i am looking for help in
1. There is a SQL server table where the SHOP floor update the quantity manufactured against a Process order.
2. I need to pick up that data from the SQL server table and update the ERP against that Process order.
Can any one explain how this can be achieved.
I checked the sample's and the templates in SDN but none of them actually show how to update any ERP?
Please advice!!.
Regards
SurajCheck this one
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/60ac6bb8-a684-2b10-208d-b90883004a5e
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/downloads?rid=/library/uuid/204a13d0-399d-2b10-ec84-9c254cd7efd4
You use this component to enable the shop floor operators to record their production order and process order confirmations using a touch screen user interface. In SAP ERP Central Component (SAP ECC) operators must complete many steps to confirm orders. Instead, you can use this interface, on a touch screen to enter the production performance easily and effectively. You can also use this component to obtain operators' work lists and information on their current activities.
Regards
Ram Upadhyay -
In process order confirmation screen there should be 2 rows for down time.
hi,
We are using cor6n for process order confirmation, where we can put down time with confirmation text at once,
if there is two different down time, then user has to again run cor6n with 0 yield for put another down time, which gets more time.
for this reason i have customised single screen entry profile by mentioning two down time & confirmation rows in screen.
when i going for confirmation i put two different down time after goods movemnt order get confirmed & settled.
but when i see report in COOISPI there is only one down time against order.
system only considers last down time.
hows the system consider down time?
thanks in advance.
regards
sanjay.Hi,
The report COOISPI considers only one line of the down time, it is not considering the 2nd row of the down time. You need to change the COOISPI program to read the 2 lines of the down time. You need to change the standard program to read the 2 down time lines.
Thanks & Regards,
V. Suresh -
Dear Experts,
In process order confirmation can we make a kind of restriction through configuration in which system should not allowed a confirm quantity of phase 20 is not greater than previous confirmed quantity of phase 10 there is no relationship between this two phases.
Regards,
Murari ShahHi.
Just my 2 cent , Not sure about standard SAP configuration perhaps there's but i don't know.
But i very sure , you can implement this with the user exist below:
===============================================================
CONFPI01 |Process order conf.: Calculate cust.specific default values
CONFPI02 |Process order confirmation: Customer spec. input checks 1
CONFPI03 |Process order conf.: Cust. spec. check after op. selection
CONFPI04 |Process order conf.: Customer specific input checks 2
CONFPI05 |Process order conf.: Cust. spec. enhancements when saving
CONFPI06 |Process order confirmation: Actual data transfer
Customise with ABAP , please check with your abaper.
Thank you. -
Process order confirmation error in COR6
Hi Gurus,
I am working as sap manual tester and facing below issue in Process order confirmation in t-code COR6.
Batch 456 for component 350515 does not satisfy BOM requirements
Message no. Z_MFG017
Need ur help.
Regards,
Imran
Edited by: imran.shek38 on Jan 25, 2011 7:16 AMHi,
Please check whether the Batch-Management checkbox is maintained for the component in the Material Master (MM02).
Also, check the Transaction MSC2N for this component and activate the checkbox for batch-managed item in the BOM.
Hope it helps.
Regards,
Kaushik -
Bapi 4 process order confirmation??
hi abapers.............
can ne1 tell me wt is the BAPI 4 process order confirmation.
thanx in advance .
anilHi
BAPI_PRODORDCONF_CANCEL
BAPI_PRODORDCONF_CREATE_ACT
BAPI_PRODORDCONF_CREATE_HDR
BAPI_PRODORDCONF_CREATE_TE
BAPI_PRODORDCONF_CREATE_TT
BAPI_PRODORDCONF_EXIST_CHK
BAPI_PRODORDCONF_GETDETAIL
BAPI_PRODORDCONF_GETLIST
BAPI_PRODORDCONF_GET_HDR_PROP
BAPI_PRODORDCONF_GET_TE_PROP
BAPI_PRODORDCONF_GET_TT_PROP
BAPI_PRODORDCONF_PDC_UPLOAD_TE
BAPI_PRODORDCONF_PDC_UPLOAD_TT
Regards
Kathirvel -
Need a BAPI/FM for process Order Confirmation
Hi guys,
I need a bapi or Fm for process Order confirmation.
thnx in advanceChecck
BAPI_PRODORDCONF_CREATE_ACT
BAPI_PRODORDCONF_CREATE_HDR
BAPI_PRODORDCONF_CREATE_TE
BAPI_PRODORDCONF_CREATE_TT
Better read the documentation of each BAPi using the tcode BAPI and proceed.
I feel BAPI_PRODORDCONF_CREATE_HDR would do your purpose.
Documentaion:
<b>
You can use this method to enter order confirmations for production orders.
You can also transfer good movements, that are posted together with a confirmation. If no goods movements have been entered for a confirmation, they are determined using the standard logic for backflushing and automatic goods receipt for confirmations. </b> -
Process order confirmation reversal
HI friends,
I am cancelling a process order confirmation using T-code CORS. The confirmation cancellation is happening, but the goods movements are not reversed. Help in resolving will be much appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Warm regards
VivekHi All,
Sorry for the delay in response and thanks for your suggestions.
The backflushing is activated. I checked in COGI transaction for the concerned order. I got several entries with different error text. The error text is as follows
"You have no authorization for this transaction with movement type 102"
"You have no authorization for this transaction in plant XXXX"
"Deficit of SL Unrestricted-use 6,957 TO : 1030604 XXXX PL01"
Please let me know how to resolve these errors.
Warm Regards
Vivek -
Process Order Confirmation and Pallet
Hi,
Would appreciate if you can pitch in to get information on below requirement.
Say for eg., for the 1000 CA of header quantity in a BOM, one (1) Pallet (PAL) is required and assume the pallet's are back flushed.
- if you confirm 1000 CA, then SAP post 1 Pallet
- if you confirm partial pallet, like 800 CA - then SAP posts 1 Pallet
- but, if you confirm partial pallet, like 400 CA - then SAP posts 0 Pallet,
I believe that's the nature of SAP design in rounding up / down. However in this unique circumstance of a Pallet, everyone would always like to Round up rather than round down.. so, in the example above confirm 400 CA should also post 1 Pallet.
I couldn't find a solution in SAP with it, and I guess a user-exit might help to round up, but not sure which user-exit at process order confirmation will help.
Any pointers would be a great helpu2026
Thanks in advance,
NitinIs HU enabled for your location? if that case, you could post by pallet.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Hi, I have a requirement in which i have to dispaly the output of a report using ALV's on two pages. The first page should display the summary categories of the costs being charged and the other pages will have details by G/L account of each of the c
-
Manually upgrading Thinkpad Yoga WiFi card
Hey all, I bought a TPY from Newegg, which shipped with the Intel Wireless-N 7260. The laptop finds and connects to my home network fine, but can't find my work WiFi network at all. I've tried a few different drivers to no avail. Would buying and ins
-
Multiple Unique Users with Limited Authority
Hello, I'm wondering if it is possible to have multiple unique users, each with permissions to view the data collected for that form, but not edit the form itself. For example: User A is the master user. They create form "1234". User B can fill out t
-
I bought Lightroom 5 from best buy, I did all of the downloads and it is on my computer, but it is in free trial mode, and I want to put in my serial # so I can use it not in the free trial mode. I have the serial number and the activation code, but
-
Updates and changing coworker's calendar
I changed the time of an appointment on my calendar. I did not want to send an update to everyone, so I pressed 'work offline' and deleted the updated messages from my outbox before they sent. Now I can see that the appointment is updated in MY cale