Ship-To Address not getting picked for one particular user

Hi SRM Gurus,
I am working on SRM5.0 system with ECC6.0 as backend.
For one particular SRM user, the Ship-To address number which has been maintained in his attributes through transaction PPOMA_BBP, as default delivery address, is not populated when he creates a SC.
This default ship-to address is not seen while creating the cart even though the address can be found via the F4 search help in the same SC.
Can anyone tell me why this is happening for one particular user?
Please note that this problem is occuring even when the user is shopping for self and creating a new SC (no copying from template). So SAP note 1055203 is not valid in my case.
I have checked the ADRC table, and this address number exists. Infact, when I assign this address number to some other user's Ship-To attribute, this default delivery address is picked in the SC.
So, I understand that the problem is not with the address, but with the linking of this address number to this user. I even tried deleting and re-assigning the address number in the attribute to this user. But, it doesnot work still.
Can anyone help me out?
Thanks n Regards,
Ancy

Ship to address not being picked from attributes for any user it was being picked from Org address data , and I had reset the value
now , when I am trying to create a SC and I have tried to add delivery address  bby 2 types .
1. By adding through the portal
2> i have tried to add the same throgh ppomabbp in user attributes "Delivery address"
I have also made it default however when I raise the SC it again shows me as blank :
I am not too sure how do I populate the value that I need . Please see below still the delivery address is blank !!

Similar Messages

  • Z implementation not getting picked for BADI  - MB_DOCUMENT_BADI

    Hi,
    I have a done a z implemenatation for standard badi MB_DOCUMENT_BADI in ECC6.In Tcode MIIGO after giving  2 line items when i save it that Zimplemen is not getting picked.
    In 4.6c the same Z implementation is getting picked.
    can you please help me out in this.

    Hi Rajeev,
    I am not sure about the definition of Badi and hence am assuming that the filter is set....and the value for the z implementation does not match the value passed from the call point. Can you please check this and confirm
    Regards,
    Jemin

  • Event not getting triggered for a few users in production

    Hi Experts!!
    We have a workflow that gets triggered on the event REQUESTCREATED of BUS2089. In production, we see that for a few users the event is getting triggered and even the workflow is. But for a few users, the workflow is not getting triggered. However, we didn't check SWEQADM yet and are waiting to get auth to check the same. But before that, I need your valuable suggestions on this.
    When I check SWEL, I cannot see any entries at all. Not even for the successfully processed ones.
    Auth objects cannot be a reason, as all the users have same auth. Please suggest me on what else can be the reasons.
    Your help is highly appreciable.

    Hello Srinivas !
                  Check in SWEQADM to know whether the event is on queue.If so, redeliver it.
                  If there is no event on queue, check the RFC queue( transaction SWU2 ) and ST22 for possible ABAP dumps.
                  Call work item list report (transaction SWI1) and check event linkages (transaction SWETYPV )of the users for whom the event is not triggered.Are you using BAdI or user- exit to trigger the workflow ? If so, check whether those are in active state.
                 Refresh the workflow buffers(transaction SWU_OBUF).Check either of the workflow versions are in active state.
    Regards,
    S.Suresh

  • Agent determination getting failed for one particular scenerio

    Hi,
    I am working on production workflow issue. Production system is cluster of hospitals for HR system. Staff applies leave from hospital A by keeping approver from hospital B. Workflow is triggering. The problem is work item is not getting placed in Approver inbox.
    So when work item is not placed in approver inbox, We have done following things.
    <li> We have run transaction SWI1_RULE to fix missing agent. This can be used to re-trigger complex user determination.
      After running the t.code, Work item was placed in approver inbox.
    But Staff complained again when he got same problem next time when leave was applied.
    <li> This time we have run transactions SWU_OBUF to refresh workflow buffer(Suggested in forum) and  SWI1_RULE to fix missing agent. After running these t.codes, Work item was placed in approver inbox.
    But Staff complained again when he got same problem next time when leave was applied. We died this time.
    Could you please tell me what kind of R&D we need to do ? By the way, this is customized Leave workflow.
    Thanks
    Venkat.O

    Hello,
    Okay, that's your problem. FInd out how the agents are determined. Look at the inputs to the rule or method and find out where it's going wrong. How are they determined?
    I don't understand how SWI1_RULE seems to fix this.
    regards
    Rick Bakker
    hanabi technology

  • UI elements not being displayed for a particular user

    Hi,
    I designed two i/p fields and text view for the same in a view. All are static UI elements and no visibility property is set.
    This view is displayed as a popup when i press the button in the main view.
    This is working fine for all the users in production except for one user.
    This particular user is able to see only one input field and the corresponding text view.The other i/p element is missed here.
    The whole component is displayed in a portal as a tab with other components in the adjacent tabs.
    Please help me out to resolve this issue.
    Is this problem is related to webdynpro abap? or
    Is this a portal issue?
    Regards,
    Bala.

    Hi balamurugan ,
    may be check the user setting for the User id .
    right click on the view click user setting . and check whether he hide that button .
    look at the pic.
    http://i46.tinypic.com/x3cyf9.jpg
    If any UI element is made invisible it will show the option invisible elements .
    you can restore it .
    http://i46.tinypic.com/2vjpraf.jpg
    Regards
    Chinnaiya P
    Edited by: chinnaiya pandiyan on May 28, 2010 4:59 PM

  • GL account not getting picked for ECESS

    Hi,
    I have configured CIN. When i am doing migo system is showing ECESS in pricing but when accounting entry is being generated it is without ECESS. Please suggest what configuration may have missed.
    Thanks

    Dear Robert,
    The Transaction event key "CES" will not be available in standard.... It may be created by own in your client place....
    May be VS8 we can use......
    Regards,
    Mohan.

  • Why am I not getting email from one particular sender? .

    Hi all,
    Hope you can help because I am stumped. A few days after installing Mountain Lion (not that I think that necessarily has anything to do with it), I stopped receiving email from a particular sender. The email from this person is very important, so I've been trying to figure out what's going on. He is in my Contact list. I have received email from his successfully for months. We did some testing yesterday. I think the email is coming in, then being deleted immediately. I hear a little ding in the background when he sends me something, but it doesn't make it into any of my inboxes.
    I have temporarily disabled junk mail filtering. I also can't find a setting that indicates to delete anything automatically. I am at a loss.
    Any ideas?
    Thanks so much!
    Sharon

    Go to Mail Preferences, and click the "Rules" icon. Make sure there are no rules that move these messages to another folder (you can just uncheck the rules to deactivate them).
    Also try searching for the sender's email address to see if it turns up - be sure to click "All" in the mailbox row after typing his address in the search box.
    And depending on what email service you use, you may want to check to make sure there are no "rules" or "filters" in the web site - for instance if you use gmail, you can set up filters in gmail that "archive" a message before Apple mail ever sees it - the mail is still there, you just wouldn't see it in your inbox. The only way to fix it is to log in through the gmail web site.
    Another possibility is that you accidentally turned on "threaded" mail view, which is extremely confusing if you don't expect it. Instead of grouping by date, the messages will be grouped by subject line - and if the person sending this message is replying to an old message of yours, it will continually group those new messages together with the old ones. Click the "View" menu, and check to see if the "Organize by conversations" option is turned on or off. Or maybe it's even simpler - maybe your mail is no longer sorted by date - what does it say at the top of the list of messages?
    Of course there's alwys the possibility that he has the wrong email address in his contacts, so keeps sending to the wrong address over and over again. He should try manually typing your full email address, and not accepting the "autofilled" suggestion.

  • OWA does not authenticate for one particular user

    Dear All,
    Hope you are doing great...!
    I am having Exchange 2010 Environment with NLB having two CAS servers bonded with it.
    One of OWA cannot authenticate ONLY ONE USER.  
    It just says user name or password is incorrect.
    Please suggest as early as possible.
    Regards, Jay.

    User account is not locked out, I even tried to reset the account password and tried unlocking the account too.
    User is able to access through other CAS node in NLB.
    User is not using any mobile device. He is using OWA in his desktop browser.
    Please help!!
    Regards, Jay.
    This is weird . did you try using other system ? Also what changes you have done for this user recently ?
    Amit Rawat | MCITP - Exchange 2007/2010| CCNA |MCSE- 2003| Lync 2010|http://blog.amitrawat.net

  • Release Strategy for Contract is not getting picked whereas it is ok for PO

    Dear Experts,
    I have created release strategy for PO with doc type, p.org, net value as chars and frg_ekko as class and release group as 02.
    I kept NB,FO,MK and WK as char values. it is working fine for PO's whereas it is not getting picked for Contracts. we need same release strategy for PO as well as for Contract.
    Kindly resolve the issue.
    Satish

    S0004830404 wrote:
    Dear Experts,
    >
    > I have created release strategy for PO with doc type, p.org, net value as chars and frg_ekko as class and release group as 02.
    > I kept NB,FO,MK and WK as char values. it is working fine for PO's whereas it is not getting picked for Contracts. we need same release strategy for PO as well as for Contract.
    >
    > Kindly resolve the issue.
    >
    > Satish
    hi,
    use create other characteristic for value CEKKO-GNETW in this use the mk , wk values in value field and assign this characteristic to your class and save.
    Thanking you

  • CLASSPATH not getting picked up for MWA

    Hi All,
    Oracle Database 11g R 11.1.0.7.0
    Oracle Applications R 12.1.1
    O/S:Linux
    CLASSPATH not getting picked up for MWA.My classes are lying under $JAVA_TOP/xyz. However my suspicion is that the jvm that deals with MWA is not looking at the classpath above.
    I checked the CLASSPATH from forms using the block $ENVIRONMENT$ and it is looking at:
    /<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/j2ee/OC4J_BI_Forms/applications/formsapp/formsweb/WEB-INF/lib/frmsrv.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/jlib/repository.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/jlib/ldapjclnt10.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/jlib/debugger.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/jlib/ewt3.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/jlib/share.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/jlib/utj.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/jlib/zrclient.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/reports/jlib/rwrun.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/forms/java/frmwebutil.jar
    This clearly does not have $JAVA_TOP/xyz under it.
    Could anyone please let us know what needs to be done and where the classes need to be placed?
    Thanks for your time!
    Regards,

    Hi,
    Did the above steps but still CLASPATH is somehow not getting picked up for MWA.
    $ env|grep CLASSPATH
    REPORTS_CLASSPATH=/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/reports/jlib/rwbuilder.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/reports/jlib/rwrun.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/jlib/zrclient.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/j2ee/home/oc4j.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/j2ee/home/lib/ojsp.jar
    AF_CLASSPATH=/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/appsutil/jdk/lib/dt.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/appsutil/jdk/lib/tools.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/appsutil/jdk/jre/lib/rt.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/apps_st/comn/java/lib/appsborg2.zip:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/apps_st/comn/java/classes
    CLASSPATH=/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/appsutil/jdk/lib/dt.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/appsutil/jdk/lib/tools.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/appsutil/jdk/jre/lib/rt.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/apps_st/comn/java/lib/appsborg.zip:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/forms/java:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/forms/java/frmall.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/jlib/ewt3.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/j2ee/OC4J_BI_Forms/applications/formsapp/formsweb/WEB-INF/lib/frmsrv.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/apps_st/comn/java/classes:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/apps_st/comn/java/classes/xxx
    $ echo $CLASSPATH
    /<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/appsutil/jdk/lib/dt.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/appsutil/jdk/lib/tools.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/appsutil/jdk/jre/lib/rt.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/apps_st/comn/java/lib/appsborg.zip:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/forms/java:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/forms/java/frmall.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/jlib/ewt3.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/j2ee/OC4J_BI_Forms/applications/formsapp/formsweb/WEB-INF/lib/frmsrv.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/apps_st/comn/java/classes:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/apps_st/comn/java/classes/xxx
    System is expecting file at default $JAVA_TOP/oracle/apps/wms/td/server location
    /<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/apps_st/comn/java/classes/oracle/apps/wms/td/server
    $ ls -l XxgilTaskSignonFunction*
    ls: XxgilTaskSignonFunction*: No such file or directory
    where user's have file at $JAVA_TOP/xxx/oracle/apps/wms/td/server location.
    /<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/apps_st/comn/java/classes/xxx/oracle/apps/wms/td/server
    $ ls
    XxgilMainPickFListener.class XxgilMainPickPage.class XxgilManifestPickFListener.class XxgilManifestPickPage.class XxgilTaskSignonFunction.class
    Not sure what changes to make to fix this.
    Any suggestions please.
    Thanks,

  • Index is not getting picked even after providing hint

    Hi All
    The index pk_sku is not getting picked even after providing the hints when executing the query.Please kindly give me such recommendations.I am providing the information.
    select  * from
    (select /*+ index(s pk_sku) */
          to_char(t.dstamp, 'YYYYmmDDHH24MI') as sort_1,
          t.client_id as CLIENT_ID ,
          t.site_id as SITE_ID,
          tz.time_zone_name as TIME_ZONE_NAME     ,
          t.owner_id as OWNER_ID,
          t.sku_id as SKU_ID,
          t.reason_id as ADJUST_TYPE,
          to_char(t.dstamp+tz.diff/24, 'DD/mm/YYYY HH24:MI') as ADJUST_DATETIME,
          t.reference_id as RECEIPT_ID,
          t.batch_id as BATCH_ID,
          t.update_qty as UPDATE_QTY,
          t.lock_code as LOCK_CODE,
          s.description as SKU_DESCRIPTION
    from  mv_inventory_transaction t
          JOIN timezone tz ON tz.site_id = t.site_id ,
           mv_sku s
    where   t.sku_id= s.sku_id
    and     t.client_id=s.client_id
    and   ( :client is null or :client = t.client_id)
    and    ( :site is null or t.site_id  in (:site))
    and    ( :owner is null or t.owner_id in (:owner))
    and    t.code= 'Adjustment'
    and   (t.dstamp+tz.diff/24) between  to_date(:dateFrom, 'DD/mm/yyyy') and to_date(:dateTo,'DD/mm/yyyy')+1
    and      (:sku is null or t.sku_id in (:sku))
    UNION ALL
    (select  /*+ index(s pk_sku) */
         to_char(t.dstamp, 'YYYYmmDDHH24MI') as sort_1,
        t.client_id as CLIENT_ID ,
          t.site_id as SITE_ID,
                          tz.time_zone_name as TIME_ZONE_NAME     ,
          t.owner_id as OWNER_ID,
          t.sku_id as SKU_ID,
          t.reason_id as ADJUST_TYPE,
          to_char(t.dstamp+tz.diff/24, 'DD/mm/YYYY HH24:MI') as ADJUST_DATETIME,
          t.reference_id as RECEIPT_ID,
          t.batch_id as BATCH_ID,
          t.update_qty as UPDATE_QTY,
          t.lock_code as LOCK_CODE,
          s.description as SKU_DESCRIPTION
    from  mv_inventory_transaction_arch t
          JOIN timezone tz ON tz.site_id = t.site_id,
           mv_sku s
    where   t.sku_id= s.sku_id
    and     t.client_id=s.client_id
    and   ( :client is null or :client = t.client_id)
    and    ( :site is null or t.site_id  in (:site))
    and    ( :owner is null or t.owner_id in (:owner))
    and    t.code= 'Adjustment'
    and   (t.dstamp+tz.diff/24) between  to_date(:dateFrom, 'DD/mm/yyyy') and to_date(:dateTo,'DD/mm/yyyy')+1
    and      (:sku is null or t.sku_id in (:sku))
    order by sort_1,2,3,4,5
    version = Release 10.1.0.5.0
    SQL> sho parameter optimizer
    NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
    optimizer_dynamic_sampling           integer     2
    optimizer_features_enable            string      10.1.0.5
    optimizer_index_caching              integer     0
    optimizer_index_cost_adj             integer     100
    optimizer_mode                       string      ALL_ROWS
    sho parameter db_file_multiblock_count_read
    sho parameter cursor_sharing
    SQL> sho parameter optimizer
    NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
    optimizer_dynamic_sampling           integer     2
    optimizer_features_enable            string      10.1.0.5
    optimizer_index_caching              integer     0
    optimizer_index_cost_adj             integer     100
    optimizer_mode                       string      ALL_ROWS
    SQL>  sho parameter db_file_multi
    NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
    db_file_multiblock_read_count        integer     16
    SQL> sho parameter cursor_sharing
    NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
    cursor_sharing                       string      EXACTExplain plan
    | Id  | Operation                              | Name                          | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                       |                               |    56 | 29736 |   345K  (1)| 01:09:07 |
    |   1 |  SORT ORDER BY                         |                               |    56 | 29736 |   345K  (1)| 01:09:07 |
    |   2 |   VIEW                                 |                               |    56 | 29736 |   345K  (1)| 01:09:07 |
    |   3 |    UNION-ALL                           |                               |       |       |            |          |
    |   4 |     NESTED LOOPS                       |                               |     2 |   984 | 29686   (1)| 00:05:57 |
    |   5 |      HASH JOIN                         |                               |     1 |   326 | 26870   (1)| 00:05:23 |
    |   6 |       TABLE ACCESS FULL                | TIMEZONE                      |     4 |    88 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |   7 |       VIEW                             | MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION      |    25 |  7600 | 26866   (1)| 00:05:23 |
    |   8 |        UNION-ALL                       |                               |       |       |            |          |
    |   9 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
    |  10 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION      |     1 |    67 | 24327   (1)| 00:04:52 |
    |  11 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | IDX_CODE_CLIENTID_690         | 79681 |       |   518   (1)| 00:00:07 |
    |  12 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
    |  13 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION      |    24 |  2328 |  2539   (1)| 00:00:31 |
    |  14 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | IDX_CODE_646                  |  9269 |       |    46   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  15 |      VIEW                              | MV_SKU                        |    37 |  6142 |  2816   (1)| 00:00:34 |
    |  16 |       UNION-ALL                        |                               |       |       |            |          |
    |  17 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL            | MV_SKU                        |   335K|    10M|  2535   (1)| 00:00:31 |
    |  18 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL            | MV_SKU                        | 37839 |  1699K|   280   (1)| 00:00:04 |
    |  19 |     NESTED LOOPS                       |                               |    54 | 26568 |   315K  (1)| 01:03:10 |
    |  20 |      HASH JOIN                         |                               |     1 |   326 |   313K  (1)| 01:02:37 |
    |  21 |       TABLE ACCESS FULL                | TIMEZONE                      |     4 |    88 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  22 |       VIEW                             | MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH |   576 |   171K|   313K  (1)| 01:02:37 |
    |  23 |        UNION-ALL                       |                               |       |       |            |          |
    |  24 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
    |  25 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH |     1 |    72 | 19258   (1)| 00:03:52 |
    |  26 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | QUI_IDX_INVTRANS_ARC1         | 36016 |       |   287   (1)| 00:00:04 |
    |  27 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
    |  28 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH |   575 | 55200 |   293K  (1)| 00:58:45 |
    |  29 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | QUI_IDX_INVTRANS_ARC1         |   367K|       |  3466   (1)| 00:00:42 |
    |  30 |      VIEW                              | MV_SKU                        |    37 |  6142 |  2816   (1)| 00:00:34 |
    |  31 |       UNION-ALL                        |                               |       |       |            |          |
    |  32 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL            | MV_SKU                        |   335K|    10M|  2535   (1)| 00:00:31 |
    |  33 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL            | MV_SKU                        | 37839 |  1699K|   280   (1)| 00:00:04 |
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------when put in sql tuning advisor,It recommended with better plan using indexes
    | Id  | Operation                              | Name                          | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                       |                               |    56 | 29736 |   340K  (1)| 01:08:01 |
    |   1 |  SORT ORDER BY                         |                               |    56 | 29736 |   340K  (1)| 01:08:01 |
    |   2 |   VIEW                                 |                               |    56 | 29736 |   340K  (1)| 01:08:01 |
    |   3 |    UNION-ALL                           |                               |       |       |            |          |
    |   4 |     NESTED LOOPS                       |                               |     2 |   848 | 26900   (1)| 00:05:23 |
    |   5 |      HASH JOIN                         |                               |     1 |   326 | 26898   (1)| 00:05:23 |
    |   6 |       TABLE ACCESS FULL                | TIMEZONE                      |     4 |    88 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |   7 |       VIEW                             | MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION      |    25 |  7600 | 26894   (1)| 00:05:23 |
    |   8 |        UNION-ALL                       |                               |       |       |            |          |
    |   9 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
    |  10 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION      |     1 |    67 | 24352   (1)| 00:04:53 |
    |  11 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | IDX_CODE_CLIENTID_690         | 79681 |       |   518   (1)| 00:00:07 |
    |  12 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
    |  13 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION      |    24 |  2328 |  2542   (1)| 00:00:31 |
    |  14 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | IDX_CODE_646                  |  9269 |       |    46   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  15 |      VIEW                              | MV_SKU                        |    37 |  3626 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  16 |       UNION-ALL PARTITION              |                               |       |       |            |          |
    |  17 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID  | MV_SKU                        |     1 |    34 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  18 |         INDEX UNIQUE SCAN              | PK_SKU                        |     1 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  19 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID  | MV_SKU                        |     1 |    46 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  20 |         INDEX UNIQUE SCAN              | PK_SKU                        |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  21 |     NESTED LOOPS                       |                               |    54 | 22896 |   313K  (1)| 01:02:38 |
    |  22 |      HASH JOIN                         |                               |     1 |   326 |   313K  (1)| 01:02:38 |
    |  23 |       TABLE ACCESS FULL                | TIMEZONE                      |     4 |    88 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  24 |       VIEW                             | MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH |   576 |   171K|   313K  (1)| 01:02:38 |
    |  25 |        UNION-ALL                       |                               |       |       |            |          |
    |  26 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
    |  27 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH |     1 |    72 | 19269   (1)| 00:03:52 |
    |  28 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | QUI_IDX_INVTRANS_ARC1         | 36016 |       |   287   (1)| 00:00:04 |
    |  29 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
    |  30 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH |   575 | 55200 |   293K  (1)| 00:58:47 |
    |  31 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | QUI_IDX_INVTRANS_ARC1         |   367K|       |  3466   (1)| 00:00:42 |
    |  32 |      VIEW                              | MV_SKU                        |    37 |  3626 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  33 |       UNION-ALL PARTITION              |                               |       |       |            |          |
    |  34 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID  | MV_SKU                        |     1 |    34 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  35 |         INDEX UNIQUE SCAN              | PK_SKU                        |     1 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  36 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID  | MV_SKU                        |     1 |    46 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  37 |         INDEX UNIQUE SCAN              | PK_SKU                        |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------So ,after checking the recommended plan I tried to execute the query with the hints,even then it is picking up the indexes in the explain plan.So please kindly help in solving the issue
    The pk_sku is the index created on client_id and sku_id columns
    Thanks
    GV

    riedelme wrote:
    My experience is differernt - hints will be followed if the optimizer determines they will be beneficial and not if they will not, including my current project on 11gR2. The example below (unfortunately only 11gR1) disproves your theory, showing the index hint is followed and that the cost increases by a factor of five.
    The most common cases of the optimizer apparently ignoring a hint are due to operator error, the hint is not well formed, or cannot be followed. There are a couple of documented cases where a hint will be ignored - first_rows used in CTAS is one.
    Jonathan Lewis writes a lot about it on his blog showing that the optimizer always acts on a well formed hint if it is at all possible.
    SQL> create table t (n number not null, c varchar2(1000));
    Table created.
    SQL> insert into t select 1, rpad('x',1000,'x')
      2  from dual connect by level <= 50000;
    50000 rows created.
    SQL> create index t_ix on t (n);
    Index created.
    SQL> exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(user, 't', cascade => true)
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    SQL> explain plan for
      2  select max(c) from t where n =1;
    Explained.
    SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    Plan hash value: 2966233522
    | Id  | Operation          | Name | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT   |      |     1 |  1004 |  1574   (1)| 00:00:19 |
    |   1 |  SORT AGGREGATE    |      |     1 |  1004 |            |          |
    |*  2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL| T    | 50000 |    47M|  1574   (1)| 00:00:19 |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
       2 - filter("N"=1)
    14 rows selected.
    SQL> explain plan for
      2  select /*+ index (t t_ix) */  max(c) from t where n = 1;
    Explained.
    SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    Plan hash value: 3231292748
    | Id  | Operation                    | Name | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT             |      |     1 |  1004 |  7244   (1)| 00:01:27 |
    |   1 |  SORT AGGREGATE              |      |     1 |  1004 |            |          |
    |   2 |   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T    | 50000 |    47M|  7244   (1)| 00:01:27 |
    |*  3 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN          | T_IX | 50000 |       |    98   (0)| 00:00:02 |
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
       3 - access("N"=1)
    15 rows selected.

  • GL Account is not getting picked by billing document

    Hi Gurus,
    one new GL account is set up by our FI team for a accrual condition type.
    case 1:
    Now when i have cancelled the previous created billing doc and trying to create again then the new GL account is not getting picked.
    case 2:
    Whereas when am doing the complete process flow like sales order creation, delivery and billing then the new GL account is getting picked.
    Could you please let me know what would be the reason for this, why its not getting picked in first case.
    Thanks,
    Ashi

    Hello Preety,
    Unless you see the Revenue Account Determination Analysis for the Billing document, it is very difficult to understand the reason. Please click on the Environment >> Acc.Determination Analysis >> Revenue account in the VF03 screen and find the missing assignment.
    Thanks,
    Suman$

  • Debit Items not getting picked while making payment with F110

    HI,
    When making payment with F110, items with Debit balance is not getting picked.
    Example:
    Payment method is assigned in the Maser data.
    For a particular vendor one item has a credit balance- posting key 31.
    We have posted another JV with F-02 and debited that vendor with Posting key 21. (Payment Method is not entered in the line item)
    When we run F110 the credit balance is picked and debit balance is being shown in exception list.
    When we got to FB02 and insert payment method in debit line item and then again run the F110 then system pickes all line items and pays the net amount.
    The question is why system is not considering Payment Method from Master Data in debit  line item, while in credit line item it is picking payment method from the master data.
    Do I need to do any setting for it so that it should automatically take payment method from master data even in case of Debit line items.
    Regards
    Sanjay

    Hi All,
    Thanks for your quick replies.
    But it does not solve my problem.
    When I am not assigning any payment method to either Debit or credit line items, system picks (payment method from Master data) for only credit line items and ignores debit line items.
    But the problem is that when I assign payment method to debit line item (which is similar to what has been assigned to vendor Master Data) system groups both debit and credit line items and makes payment of only net amount.
    My question was why system considered the debit line item for making payment if I manually enter payment method in the line item, if system has been designed only for out going payment. In my opinion It should have reacted similarly irrespective of whether payment method entered in the line item or not.
    Regards
    Sanjay

  • File not getting picked by File CC

    Hi Experts,
    Q1)An issue in files not getting picked up by communication channel in an inbound scenario  R/3<XI<-File Port
    Retry interval started. Length: 120.0 seconds
    7/24/09 1:33:14 PM   Error occurred while connecting to the FTP server "XXX.XXX.XX.webdti.com:21": java.net.SocketException: Connection timed out:could be due to invalid address
    7/24/09 1:32:00 PM   Processing started
    Any Quick helps highly appreciated.
    Q2)How can i restart an file adapter?
    Thanks,
    Sudhansu

    Hi Sudhanshu,
       Regarding your first question, check if you are able to  access the file port manually typing the ftp address in internet explorer or any browser.
    Regarding your Q2, read this:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/1b/d5ef3b1ad56d4fe10000000a114084/content.htm
    (CTRL+F for "To restart the adapter")
    Regards,
    Ravi

  • Files not getting picked from the FTP site

    Dear All,
    We are having one File-XI-RFC scenario running in XI-PRD Server. Sometimes what happens is that files available in the FTP site are not getting picked by the File adapter. I have checked in the adapter monitoring and communication channel is active there. Also, there are no errors regarding this in SXMB_MONI. I have configured alerts also but for this case no alerts are getting trigerred. And also when I am reactivating that particular communication channel then that file is getting picked instantaneously.
    Can anybody please guide me on what might be the real cause for this as this error is happening randomly.
    regards,
    N.Jain.

    HI,
    Have you used per File transfer parameter in FTP Communication channel.
    It makes the FTP adapter inactive in ideal time.
    So add the poll interval may be for every 30 mins or something like it. It will forcefully activate the FTP port after every 30 mins. You may have the poll interval for every 1 min. Only the files to be picked up are getting logged in in XI monitoring.
    So there will be no garbage collection of unwanted messages in Monitoring.
    Thanks
    Swarup

Maybe you are looking for