Ship To assignment to Sold To not needed in Order

Hi experts,
Can I book an order with a ship to who is not assigned to the sold to ?
Ex: Sold to 1000 has 2 ship tos --> 1001 & 1002
Sold to 2000 has 1 ship to --> 2001
Can I book an order with Sold to 1000 and ship to 2001 ?
I am surprised to see this happen. My system (4.7) lets me do this. Looks like I need a patch update but thought I would confirm.
Thanks !
VA01, Partner functions, XD01, Ship to part, Sold to party.

Can I book an order with a ship to who is not assigned to the sold to ?
Yes, you can do it in versions 4.7EE and above, provided the customer master exists for the ship to in this sales area.
I remember, it is not possible in 4.6C (and other older versions).
Thanks,
Ravi

Similar Messages

  • Find Ship-to's not assigned to Sold-to's

    I need to figure out all ship-to that have not been assigned to any sold-to, is there an easy way to do this? Also, is there any configuration or enhancement that would make it mandatory to assign ship-to to a sold-to at a sales order level.
    Thanks in advance for your help.

    Hi,
    Using KNVP table we can get the list of partners based on the parner function(SH) with respect to sales organization.
    use the following menupath
    SE11 --> give the table as KNVP, press F7 then ShiftCtrlF10 it takes you to the screen where you can give inputs, like sales org and partner function which you require.
    Before executing ensure that maximum no.hits field is blank.
    Now you can get the list of Ship-to-party's existing.
    if you select the mandatory option of the SP and SH functions as mandatory for customer master, it takes sold to number as even ship to, if you want to give some other number as ship to , you can give that manually in the customer master(Unlimited).
    Then you can select any Ship to  existing in CMR in the sales order.
    Hope this information clarifies all.
    Let me know if you need any thing more on this.
    Regards,
    Ravi Duggirala

  • Error Message while ship to party is not assigned to sold to party in VA01

    Hi All,
    In VA01, i need to throw an error message while giving a ship to party, which is not assigned to sold to party.
    I tried in  EXIT_SAPLV09A_001
                  EXIT_SAPLV09A_002
                  EXIT_SAPLV09A_003
                  EXIT_SAPLV09A_004
    above user exits, but i couldnt find the solution.
    if possible provide with the code.
    i appericiate the early response.
    Regards,
    Kumar.

    User exit MV45AFZB, form-routine USEREXIT_CHECK_VBAK.

  • Ship-To not assigned to Sold-To, even though able to create an order

    Hi,
    We have a peculiar scenario.
    We have a Sold-To Ex: 1100, ship to 1200 and 1300 for a sales area, ex 1000-10-10. Here only 1200 Ship-to is assigned to Sold to 1100. ( SH 1300 is not assigned to SP 1100).
    I am able to create an order for 1100 and 1200 for the above sales area, it is fine with the system.
    But system is allowing me to create and order for 1100 and 1300 toooo. As per my knowledge system should not accept this order and system should give us a message like this "ship to is not maintained for this sold to" or some thing like that.
    This is happening in ECC6.0. As i already checked with the system there is no enhancement or user exits used. Is it standard behavior of ECC6.0 or is there any solution for this problem.
    Any help help form any one so much help full.
    Thanks
    Venkat Cheedalla.

    Hi Venkatesh,
    You can do this in Customer Master of Sold-to party: 1100. In master, go to Sales Area Data Tab --> Partners Tabstrip. There you will find a Ship-to-Party Customer Code. Here change the 1100 code to 1200. Then Save.
    Now while creation of Sale Order, system will automatically give you the Ship-to party as 1200. And if you want to change that Ship-to Party, then system will give you an Information message that Ship-to needs to be redetermined.
    If you want that this Information Message should come as Error Message, then I think some customizations needs to be done in SPRO.
    Regards,
    Vishal

  • Sales Order creation with Ship to not assigned to Sold to

    Hi There,
    I have an issue that I am able to create an order with a Ship to which is not assigned to Sold to. i.e, The sold to accepts any ship to and not giving any error. I am giving both Sold to and Ship to together while order creation. Is it because of this? Should I enter sold to and then press enter for the list of Ship to's assigned to that? I dont find any issues in the Partner determination.
    Can you help?
    Thanks in advance,
    Renjith

    Hi Renjith,
    I agree with you that SAP allows you to enter any ship to(belonging to sales org of sold-to party) for a given sold to party.
    To meet your requirement, You may like to use the Userexit MV45AFZZ (Form USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT_PREPARE) to check the Ship-to while saving. Thus a comparison could be made with assigned Ship-Tos for the  given Sold-to party. In case there is a mismatch throw a error message before allowing committing of save.
    Your developer would be able to help you to achieve this
    Please let me know if this helps
    Warm regards
    Harpreet

  • Ship to party not assigned to sold to party still can i create a sale order

    Hi ,
    For example i have a ship to Party B who is not assigned to Sold to Party A . System is allowing me to create a sale order for the above mentioned "Sold to" and "ship to"  combination. What is the logic behind this ? is it a provided functionality or a bug?

    hi,
    for example if you are using account group 0001, when you create a customer it has the ability of picking up a SH, BP and PY along with SP. this is the underlying config at account group. Now for SP 100 the ship party can 100 or 200 ... or you can modify at the order level. Its not necessary that 200 has been identified at the customer master creation level itself. But partner function SH shoudl be availble in the account group with which the customer is created.
    regards
    sadhu kishore

  • I bought an iPhone 4S at a supplier who uses Talkmobile. When I called to port my number to GiffGaff they said the phone did not need to be unlocked even though the guy who sold my husband the phone at the Warehouse place said you did. Now I have an ac

    I bought an iPhone 4S at a supplier who uses Talkmobile. When I switched to GiffGaff and asked the Talkmobile people to port my number and the code which they gave me, they told me my iPhone was never locked and did not need to be unlocked. Now my GiffGaff seems to be up and running and my husband can even leave new voicemail messages but I cannot access my phone. Everytime I put the SIM in it says it's not a valid SIM and that I need a supported carrier SIM. To me that sounds like the phone is locked.

    My husband (who set this up) is going over to Carphone Warehouse right now. He seemed to think that it was locked. But when we asked the carrier we picked, they said it was not locked so they could not unlock it. 
    Are all of you answering these questions familiar with the UK carriers? I am from the US but this was bought and serviced in the UK--nothing to do with the US.
    Maybe the vendor who sold the phone can/will unlock it for us no problem. I guess I will know in the next 5-6 hours. I have just been without a phone for almost an entire day now and it's very frustrating and I thought someone might have had this exact problem and could answer the question for me outright.
    Thanks for everyone's help. Sorry to take up your time.

  • How to create ship to party and sold to party for DC10 during sales order ?

    Hello all:
    When creating sales order for a material in VA01 with sales Org 1000,
    distribution channel 10, division 00
    The system does not give me any Ship to Party and Sold to Party with the above combination
    How to create ship to party and sold to party with the above combination (Plant 1000,
    sales org 1000, distribution channel 10, during creation of a sales order
    Ironically, when creating material master for a material with a material type KMAT, plant 1000
    sales org 1000, the only distribution channel is populating in the input help (F4) is 10
    For which no ship to party neither sold to party is maintained in sales order creation
    Thanks in Advance!!

    Dear Eshwer
    It is bcoz, the said account groups (Sold To Party and Ship To Party) are not created in the sales area 1000 / 10 / 00.
    To create a customer master, you have to go to XD01, select the Account Group, Company Code and the respective Sales Area and execute.  In the Customer Master, you have three tabs, viz.General Data where you have give address details of the customer, then in Control Data, you have to assign the respective Recon Account and in Sales Area Data, you have to maintain the customer's sales related details.  Once you give all these datas and save the data, a customer code will be displayed at the bottom.
    Now go to VA01, input the sale order type and the sales area and execute.
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Create Ship to Party and Sold to Party for distr. channel 10 in VA01

    Hello all:
    When creating sales order for a material in VA01 with sales Org 1000,
    distribution channel 10, division 00, system does not give me any Ship to Party and Sold to Party with the above combination
    How to create ship to party and sold to party with the above combination (Plant 1000,
    sales org 1000, distribution channel 10, for creation of a sales order
    Ironically, when creating material master for a material with a material type KMAT, plant 1000
    sales org 1000, the only distribution channel is populating in the input help (F4) is 10
    For which no ship to party neither sold to party is maintained in sales order creation
    Thanks in Advance!!

    Hello Csaba:
    Thanks for your reply
    I agree that for a combination of sales order, dc and division one can have
    many customers. But the customer master data of sold to party in linked to the sales order,
    dc and division
    When sold to party is entered the system will copy the sales order, dc and division
    which is maintaiined in the customer master data
    Sold to party details and the material for which sales order is being created needs to
    be matched in terms of sales org, dc and division then system will process the sales order
    In my current client, there is NO SHIP TO PARTY customer master data maintained
    with a combination of sales order 1000, dc 01, division 00, thus it do not process
    further as material for which sales order is being created has the above combination
    Due points have been assigned

  • [SD] Third party with Ship-to different to Sold-to

    Dear all,
    >> In sales order third-party, I change the partner Ship-to different to Sold-to. When making good receipts for the relavant Purchase order (created for this sales order), the system outputs the Error Message no. KE396: Inconsistency between a document field and the prof. segment number
    >> The detail explanation for this message issued by system is following:
    Diagnosis
    A line item was assigned to a profitability segment (number 0000124336) which has the value 0000001000 for characteristic Customer. The original document (FI document, sales order, internal order, etc.), however, contains 0000001010 in this field. It is therefore inconsistent with the profitability segment found.
    System Response
    The characteristics in Profitability Analysis (CO-PA) must have the same characteristic values as the original document. For example, you cannot assign a sales order to a different customer or product than the one contained in the original sales order. If you wish to fill the characteristics with different contents, you must change the original fields.
    Procedure
    Enter the correct characteristic values on the CO-PA assignment screen. The system will automatically assign a corresponding profitability segment number. If it is not possible to enter values in some of these fields, delete the entire assignment to a profitability segment number and then enter it again.
    As a rule, you should first enter the fields in the original sender document and then make the assignment to a profitability segment.
    Thanks,
    Son

    Dear Chandra Duvvada,
    Thanks for your reponse. T-code KEDR is used for derivation that we can use to assign new value Ship-to based on Sold-to in COPA. However, it is not adapted to this case. Because in PO, the customer field has value as the shipto in sales order. And the system is not allowed. We decide not use different Ship-to in case third party sales.
    Thanks for your answer.
    Son

  • Error while converting Ship-to-party to Sold-to-party

    Hi,
    I need to covert a Ship-to-party to Sold-to-party using transaction XD07. While converting the above i m getting the following error
    The planned change is not allowed as the following field
    groups would be masked by the new account group
    Group                                  Modif group 1
    V D315  Shipping                       017 Order combination
    When i checked the difference between account groups Sold-to and Ship-to, it was the Order combination field in Shipping tab which was suppressed in Sold-to party and an optional entry in Ship-to-party. because of which i was getting the error while converting a ship-to party to sold to party.
    Please help me in transforming the Ship-to-party to Sold-to-party without changing the account groups in OBD2.
    Thank you,
    Arun.S

    Hi
    I am not able to convert any partner functions. the system displays the below error for all combinations (SP --> SH, SP --> PY, SH --> SP etc). Below is the error message i got whe i tried to change SP to SH.
    The planned change is not allowed as the following field
    groups would be masked by the new account group
    Group                                  Modif group 1
    A D120  Control                        017 Vendor
                                           018 Corporate group
                                           023 Industry
                                           029 Authorization
                                           036 Trading partner
    A D130  Payment transactions           030 Bank details
                                           032 Alternative payer account
    F D215  Payment transactions           010 Payment methods
                                           011 Alternative payer account
    Is there any way to avoid this error and go ahead with the conversion.
    Thank you,
    Arun.S

  • Avaialble Ship to party for Sold to customer

    Is there any standard report avaialbe which will give ship to party assigned to sold to party and its address..
    I do not want tables.

    You can use KNVP table for this purpose. I mean just pass all the sold to parties as input and select partner function as ship to.
    System will display you back the list of all the ship to party customers assigned to those respective sold to party customer.

  • Late 2009 Mac Mini EFI 2.1 Firmware update not needed/already factory installed?

    Here has been my issue of trying to figure out if Mac Mini can handle (and fully use) 8GB of RAM with my current EFI version.  
    I want to upgrade to 8GB on a LATE 2009 Mac Mini that currently has Boot ROM MM31.00AD.B00 and was told to update with EFI Firmware update 2.1 but it does not install saying "This update is not needed on this machine".
    I found various contradicting posts saying that I need my Boot ROM to be MM31.0081.B06 or my machine won't utilize the 8GB fully
    and will slow down in performance and/or crash after the Apple recommended 4GB.
    But here's what I found interesting. Some users have mentioned that the Late 2009 Mac Mini's shipped with updated firmware and don't need this update but could not find a concrete answer as to yes it did ship with it or not.
    Apple doesn't even list a Late 2009 Mac Mini as needing a Firmware update in this list of Firmware updates:  http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1237 . Should I just assume that my machine shipped with said update and is capeable of the 8GB? I use this for Logic Pro 9 as a somewhat portable workstation that I can take with me so maxing out the RAM would be ideal for me.
    Any help or clarification would be greatly apprishiated,
    Nelson

    Actually a Late 2009 can take 8GB of RAM and only the Early 2009 needs the EFI update.
    see > Apple Mac mini Memory DDR3 / Ram upgrades for 2009 Mac mini & 2010 Mac mini unibody models
    If you have any dough's, contact the OWC tech specialist
    at > OWC Tech Center: Online Guides & Videos, FAQ, Manufacturer Links, Product Manuals, and more

  • Fetch Sales order number and PO number from ship to party and sold to party

    HI,
    I need to get Sales order number and PO number
    from ship to party and sold to party.
    I have only ______sold to party and ship to party and req del date_______ in selection screen as mandatory
    Please let me know
    Sreekanth

    Hi,
    You can do this:-
    SELECT VBELN FROM LIKP
    INTO TABLE T_DELIVERIES
    WHERE KUNNR = SHIP TO PARTY
    AND     KUNAG = SOLD TO PARTY
    AND LFDAT      = DEL DATE.
    You will get a table containing the list of deliveries.
    Use VBFA to get the sales orders from deliveries.
    SELECT VBELV FROM VBFA
    INTO TABLE T_SALESORDERS
    WHERE VBTYP_N = 'J'
    AND     VBELN  = T_DELIVERIES-VBELN.
    T_SALESORDERS WILL give you list of sales orders.
    From Sales Orders you can get Purchase orders through EKKN Table.
    Using EKKN pass T_SALESORDERS-VBELN and get corresponding EBELN.
    Regards,
    SUbhashini

  • Account assignment to Profit. segment not supported with this G/L account

    Hello Guru,
                we have activated the COPA- Costing based. after activation while doing the Shipping Cost calculation thr T.C VI01
    system is throughing error message
    Account assignment to Profit. segment not supported with this G/L account
    Message no. ME032
    Thanks And Advance
    Laxmi narayan

    Hi
    Probably the GL Account is not created as Cost element with CE category 1 (costs)
    Jayaram

Maybe you are looking for

  • Invalid File Handle Windows 7 with Novell Client 2 SP1

    Hello! I have a user on Windows who gets "invalid file handle" when saving files in WordPerfect and possibly Adobe as well. He thinks it mostly occurs when he has multiple files open and has saved one open file to a different directory. Then if he go

  • Integration of Delivery header and item into a single ods

    Hi Nagesh, The reason why i have started a new thread is to award you some more points as i cannot assing you any more points in the prvious thread. I ahve a question though....... you want me to add hdr data to sales document number right.... bue my

  • Mail for Exchange Widget N97mini

    Hi everybody I have the following problem with Mail for Exchange on my Nokia N97mini : On the startsite i got that Mail for Exchange Widget, but it only shows my outgoing mails instead of my incoming mails. Can somebody tell me how i make them switch

  • Safari wont open any pages that require log in

    Hi, we are having problems accessing any internet pages that require log in from Safari on our macbook pro, including Facebook, hotmail, bank site, and even this forum (on the old pc now). All other pages work fine. Things we have tried so far, resta

  • Setup IdM 8.0 with NetBeans 6.1, setRepo issues

    It seems like the setRepo command doesn't work. I'm trying to use the MySQL repo, but it reverts back to jdbc:hsqldb:hsql://127.0.0.1 What am I missing ? ps: the javapassion.com tutorials are informative, but I've still got some problems.