Shipping conditions not determined for 'Vendor return PO'.

Dear Frens,
I have completed successfully vendor return process CONFIG.
Still system is not determining the Shipping details in PO.
I created Plant without copying from standard plant. Any settings missing due to this?
What might be the reason, can please advise.
Regards.. RAMAN.

Please find the Error details as below:;
Regards,, RAMAN
No shipping data could be found for item 00010
Message no. ME393
Diagnosis
The system attempted to determine certain shipping data for returns item 00010 (e.g. the responsible sales organization and the shipping point). However, the system was not able to find the relevant information.
Possible reasons:
The vendor's customer number does not exist
The material master record does not exist or has been flagged for deletion
The data on the sales organization, the distribution channel or the division is missing for the plant
a shipping point could not be determined
Procedure
If the message is a warning, you can continue your processing.
If it is an error message, you cannot do so.
If necessary, check the settings for the plant in Customizing for Logistics (General).

Similar Messages

RG23 Part II not updating for Vendor Return

All SAP Gurus,
In case of Vendor Return..
RG 23 Part I is getting updated.
But RG23 Part II is not getting updated.
Where may be the problem?
Regards,

dear sir.
when u do vendor return ,
1) part1 will get updated in RG23 part1.
2) RG23 part II will not update until you utilized in J2IUN, after utilization then only it will update to RG23 part II
in j2iun we can utilized with respective u r vendor return excise invoice number.
or
if u r series group ( Immediate Utilization of CENVAT indicator active), while creating excise invoice in j1is , it will update the part II
regards
jrp

VA00 condition type not getting determined for the returns order

Hi All,
I have a case where VA00 condition type not getting determined for the returns order that has been created with respect to the billing document.
When the pricing conditions are being copied from invoice it is getting copied but later it is getting deleted in the include LV61AA42.
Note:VA00 condition type is getting deleted from the internal table tkomv[].
If any one came across this scenario can you please help me.
Request your valuable inputs

Hi,
Please check the copy control setting in VTAA.
Maintain the pricing type as "D" at item category level for the respective document type .
Hope this will resolve your issue.
Regards,
Krishna O

Part1 is not generating for Vendor Subsequent delivey

Hi ASAP
I hope you must be doing great; steps are as follow which Iu2019m following for vendor return and subsequent delivery for Raw / Capital goods.
1. PO -> MIGO (101) -> Excise capture & Posting using J1IEX -> MIRO.
For excise, part1 & 2 to relevant register posting has taken placed.
Now quality dept. has rejected the goods, for which vendor delivery should take place.
2. For Vendor return Delivery
MIGO 122 w.r.t GR of 101-> Excise capture & Posting using J1IS&V.
For Excise, Part1 is getting created using J1IS, J1IV is creating Part 2, in Acct. doc. RG23C BED/ECS/HEC is being Credit and "PLA On Hold" is being Debited for BED/ECS/HEC amount.
3. For Vendor subsequent delivery, I have done the excise config. for Movt. 123 .
MIGO 123 w.r.t. GR of 122.
While doing GR for 123, system is not generating Excise screen.
Any way, After GR of 123, I have Capture Excise Invoice after inputting all relevant data, but while Posting, System is generating message that Part1 is does not exist for vendor excise invoice.
Now I think requirement is visible for your understanding to suggest me some valuable idea.
If possible can plz drop a test mail to hksiva.manoj at gmail dot com for further clarification?
Thanks & Regards
Manoj K Singh

Hi Rajaram,
Thanks for your ealiest reply, yes i have done the config. which you suggested,
Even after this " Specify which mvt type involves excise invoices", assignment system is not generating Excise screen for Movt. 123 w. r. t. 122.
Manoj K Singh

Part1 is not Generating for Vendor Subsequent Delivery

Hi ASAP
I hope you must be doing great; steps are as follow which Iu2019m following for vendor return and subsequent delivery for Raw / Capital goods.
1. PO -> MIGO (101) -> Excise capture & Posting using J1IEX -> MIRO.
For excise, part1 & 2 to relevant register posting has taken placed.
Now quality dept. has rejected the goods, for which vendor delivery should take place.
2. For Vendor return Delivery
MIGO 122 w.r.t GR of 101-> Excise capture & Posting using J1IS&V.
For Excise, Part1 is getting created using J1IS, J1IV is creating Part 2, in Acct. doc. RG23C BED/ECS/HEC is being Credit and "PLA On Hold" is being Debited for BED/ECS/HEC amount.
3. For Vendor subsequent delivery, I have done the excise config. for Movt. 123 .
MIGO 123 w.r.t. GR of 122.
While doing GR for 123, system is not generating Excise screen.
Any way, After GR of 123, I have Capture Excise Invoice after inputting all relevant data, but while Posting, System is generating message that Part1 is does not exist for vendor excise invoice.
Now I think requirement is visible for your understanding to suggest me some valuable idea.
If possible can plz drop a test mail to hksiva.manoj at gmail dot com for further clarification?
Thanks & Regards
Manoj K Singh

Hi Rajaram,
Thanks for your ealiest reply, yes i have done the config. which you suggested,
Even after this " Specify which mvt type involves excise invoices", assignment system is not generating Excise screen for Movt. 123 w. r. t. 122.
Manoj K Singh

Vendor Creation ,Partner role OA not allowed for Vendor of a/c group ZLOV

Dear Freinds,
I am facing problem of Vendor creation , i am getting message PARTNER ROLE OA NOT ALLOWED FOR VENDOR OF ACCOUNT GROUP ZLOV.
While creation of Vendor in Partner function i could not enter partner number, system is not accepting any data, message is getting as above.due to which i could not create any vendor.
Presently I am in process/ setting of ERS functionality in MM,
now all my Vendor creation is stuck up ,
please help me how to solve the problem
Regards
Dilip

Hi Dilip,
Check first have you Define Permissible Partner Roles per Account Group..
Check the path:
SPRO-Materials Management-Purchasing-Partner Determination-Define Permissible Partner Roles per Account Group
Here check whether OA is assigned with ZLOV or not...If no then click on new entries and enter partner function as OA and Vendor account group ZLOV...Save nd come out...
Now proceed...Hope it helps..
Utsav

I have creatd smartform for vendor return invoice and i m using std zprog o

i have creatd smartform for vendor return invoice and i m using std zprog of other client and corresponding prog.. when i run this program using .....after creating transc in se93. is it not workin ..
where should i check for error and i am not getting selection screen in se38 program which i am using with this smartform..
can u tel me step wise....what is the procedure so i can run and execute and see my output..
please
regards.

Hi,
when you run program from SE38 are you able to see the selection screen and able to exucute with out error....
And when you run the t-code which you created for your Z-prog whats the message its giving...
Regards,
Shankar.

Excise Details are not maintanied for Vendor 0000000957.

Hi,
As per our regular process we are capturing inovie with J1IEX and doing GR in MB01 now i have captured invoice in J1IEX and while making GR with MIGO i am getting error
Excise Details are not maintanied for Vendor 0000000957. , but when i am making GR with MB01 i am not getting any error.
also what configuration required to capture excise invoice and make Gr in MIGO, as capture excise invoice menu is not coming in MIGO in MIGO Exicse tab i can only see only refer excise invoice , only part1 , no exicse registration.
regards,
zafar

Hi,
Do proper setings in Logistics - General -Tax on Goods Movements -India -Basic Settings -Maintain Excise Groups - select your excise group and check settings in MIGO Settings such as EI Capture, Post EI in MIGO, Duty different at GR.
Also ensure that you have maintained excise details for Vendor and Material in J1ID.
Regards,
Vikas

Excise Details are not maintanied for Vendor: GRN error

Dear All,
We have upgraded our Ecc 6.0 system to latest application SAPKH60016 ( SAP_APPL ). WHile testing the system, for import GR's we are getting error saying Excise Details are not maintanied for Vendor. J1ID is also maintained & previously we have received lot of GR's for the same vendor. No changes have been done to Vendor & CIN master.
Please let me know if any note or object to be updated to correct this error.
Thanks
Raghavendra.

hiii
Can u tel me where exactly the excise range was missing ??
Because if excise range is missing , it won't throw this lind of error .
U have found any other???????
Thnaks
SAP-MM

Excise Details are not maintanied for Vendor, Message no. 8I565;

Hi Gurus,
We have up-graded system from 4.7 to ECC 6.0, Now encountering following error while capturing Excise at MIGO.
Excise Details are not maintanied for Vendor 0000202040. Message no. 8I565;
Kindly suggest a solution for the above error.
Best regards
Naveen D'Souza

Hello ,
Excise Details are not maintanied for Vendor 0000202040. Message no. 8I565
The above given error is common while MIGO while capture of excise invoice. The above written guys are correct, please check J1ID for that Vendor,
1) if after maintening also , suppose you get the above error while MIGO, then select "Only Part1" option in MIGO , and press Check Button, if error goes,
then again go back and select "Capture excise invoice", then system will not give you the above error while Capture of excise invoice in MIGO.
Please check some SAPOSS notes also.
Regards
Mahesh Naik.

Automatic Payment program: Payment method not defined for vendor abroad

Hi All,
I have a situation wherein the client has a company code in Poland . The Company code is trying to make a payment via f110 to a vendor based in sweden. The vendor wants payment to the invoice to be made in Polish Currency i.e. it wants clearing to be done in Company codes local currency.
But F110 is throwing the error Payment method not defined for vendor abroad. Can you suggest what could be the possible Error.
Regards
Nitin

Nitin,
Have you followed the above advice, i.e. used the same medium format just allowing foreign payments for it?
AFAIK, the Poland banks require a separate format for foreign payments, if only because international bank nbr SWIFT has to also be given and not just the IBAN.
At my company, the Deutsche Bank Poland requested IDocs to be set up instead, I'm working on it now..
thanks

Business area not determined for line item?

Hello All,
I am trying to create a sales order. When I enter a line item and enter plant for the item, it gives me an error "Business area not determined for the line item #" and it does not accept the item.
I have already checked in the enterprise structure in IMG that the business area is defined and assigned for this plant.
Is there anything else need to be done? Do we have to define or assign the business area in material master?
I would appreciate if somebody can answer.
Thanks.

There are three rules for determining a business area:
o   Rule 1: plant and division
o   Rule 2: for each sales area
o   Rule 3: for each plant and item division
See what you are missing

Condition Type NAVS not determined for Goods PO

Hi all,
I am working on SRM 5.0 and R/3 4.6C.The problem im facing is for the tax condition determination for PO for Goods type which replicated from SRM to PO .
In case of Service PO,the conditions are determined correctly and can be seen in the PO print out.However In case of a goods PO,if i goto conditions tab in ME23N for the PO,the conditions (NAVs) are not determined as well as they cant be seen in PO print .
The config on R/3 side is Correct as in case of manual PO(PO created directly in R/3),the conditions are determined correctly.
Now when i debuuged the BAPi "BAPi_PO_CREATe1",i observed the following:
If i chnage the field PO_PRICE in the table POITEM to "1",then conditions are determined corretcly for the PO.However by dfault,the value for this field comes to "2".
This field is nothing but indicator of the price i.e. 1 for Gross and 2 for Net.
Can anybody explain me the link between this price and condition types determined in PO.
Thanks.

Check out SAP Note 580225 - Purchasing BAPIs: Conditions and pricing
Hope it helps

Account posting for vendor return mvmt type 161 is not correct. how to fix?

Dear all,
I have a question with regards to the account entry posting on process about vendor return using movement type 161.
Presently when we tested the system for this transaction, the account entry posting is:
Cr. Stock
Dr.     GR/IR
However, I don't think this is correct, as it is a vendor return in which vendor should be the debit object, not the GR/IR clearing account. In another word, it should be:
Cr. Stock
Dr.    Vendor
If my opinion is correct, how do we fix this error posting in the system. I know it is OBYC but what transaction key, or what account modification in GBB?
Please advise and help.
Thanks.

Dear Polly,
thanks for your feedback, but from an accounting perspective, it might not be accurate.
For example,
GR of Stock A:
Dr. Stock A
   Cr. GR/IR
Invoice of the stock A:
Dr. GR/IR
   Cr. Vendor
Next, stock A is spoiled and return back to vendor with 161
Dr. Stock
   Dr. GR/IR
In this case, the GR/IR is hanged in the middle? how to solve it? I have tested in SAP, and it is using WRX in this 161 movement, which I find the logic is not accurate from business sense.
Please advise. Thanks.

Stock Transport Order-shipping point not determined

Hi MM Gurus,
We need to set up STO for transferring stock from plant 2000 to 1000. I have completed following setting.
IMG
Enterprise Structure-Assignment-Sales and Distribution-Assign sales organization to company code
Both the sales orgnizations are in same company code. We have only one company code.
Enterprise Structure-Assignment-Sales and Distribution-Assign sales organization - distribution channel - plant
The sales area 1000 is are assigned to both the plants 1000 & 2000 and sales area 2000 is also assigned to both the plants.
Enterprise Structure-Assignment-Logistics Execution-Assign shipping point to plant
Plant 1000 is assigned to sales area 1000 & 2000. Plant 2000 is assigned to sales area 1000 & 2000.
Materials Management-Purchasing-Purchase Order-Set up Stock Transport Order-Define Shipping Data for Plants
For plant 1000 & 2000 cusomer master 56 & 57 respectively are maintained. The sales orginzation for these plants are 1000 & 2000 respectively.
Materials Management-Purchasing-Purchase Order-Set up Stock Transport Order-Assign Delivery Type and Checking Rule
Delivery type NL has been assigned to document type UB.
The details of customer master 56 & 57 are as below
Account Group - Sold To Party
Reconcilliation account -121000
Delivery plant 1000 & 2000 respectively
Please note - No vendor number is maintained in these cusomer masters.
Created these plants as vendors
Account group 0007(Plants) and assigned plant numbers in the additional data of purchasing.
Material 251 is created and maintained in both the sales orgnization.
Now when I am creating the STO for transferring goods from plant 2000 to 1000, I am getting error message.
"Not possible to determine shipping data for material 251"
Am I missing something? Some documentation say that I should create a receiving plant as customer in the sales area of supplying plant. If this is true, how to do it?
Also, what is the significance of return vendor (maintaining vendor master in the customer) in this case?
Your any clue will be appreciated.
Thanks,
Shekhar

Shekhar,
Customer must be maintained as a shipto as well.
In your STO config settings you don't need a customer assigned to the source plant, unless it will also be a destination plant (e.g. you also intend to execute STOs in the reverse direction, or from another plant).
While looking at your customer (shipto), you will also want to look at Route Determination for this customer. Typically, your route will be defined by customer zone (from cust master), shipping point zone (from shipping point definition configuration), and shipping conditions (customer master). Route will be used during delivery creation to schedule the delivery. Logically, the total duration between Material Availability date to Delivery date of the delivery (picking/packing/load/transit) should be something close to the planned delivery time in the Material Master, in order to maintain consistency throughout the entire planning and execution process.
Don't forget to maintain your STO Purchase req stuff IMG>MM>Purch>PurReq>Set up Stock Transport Requisition.
Rgds,
DB49

Shipping conditions not determined for 'Vendor return PO'.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for