Shipping Doucment creation on ETM Planning Board ..

Hello Everybody
I m planning machine hours of ETM equipment in my project (PS). I have done all the necessary settings required and are getting requirement generated automatically in ETM planning board without making requisition note. Planning board is also letting me assign PS requirement to ETM equipment but is not allowing me to create shipping document from planning board. When i press SHIPPING button on planning baord, message appears that " NO RECIPIENT COULD BE DETERMINED" !
Recipient and sender are mentioned in requisition note which i have avoided as i have generated requirement from my PS Project. Can anyone advise if i have to create requisition note for the requirement generated from PS Project as well or i could enter recipient in PS project as well?
Regards,
Kashif

Hello Everyone Again
I have found answer myself.
Recipient of ETM Requirement generated from PS Project has to be created through VD01 (Create Customer) with Project Definition as recipient type.
This recipient type allows certain project definition to be entered in customer master data which becomes the recipient while making shipment document of equipments.

Similar Messages

  • Creation of Order in DS Planning Board (/SAPAPO/CDPS0)

    Hi all,
    My requirement is i want to create order manually in DS planning board by passing product, location,resource,runlength etc.
    Again i am using PPM to calculate the setup time (between previous order and the current order).
    In order to get the PPM data, i am calling FM "/SAPAPO/DM_PPM_GET_PLAN" and here i pass planid to get the details.
    To get planid, i call FM "/SAPAPO/SOS_FIND" i.e. to get source of supply information which includes planid
    Please tell me
    (1) what is planid ?
    (2) How planid is this linked to PPM ?
    (3) What do we mean by sources of supply? Can't we get the same info from pegid ?
    (4) What is the structure of PPM ? I mean what are activities, components, alternative components etc.
    Regards,
    Deb

    Hi Nandha / Vikas
    Thanks for your input.
    I am summerizing the whole concept, Please correct me and answer my questions in between :-
    In order to create an order in DS Planning board manually, we need information like product,location,resource,quantity etc. (User's input).
    Then we should follow the steps as follows -:
    Step 1 :- Find Sources of Supply
    Since this gives information like how we are going to produce or procure the product. It can be PPM or PDS or Transportation lane.
    For PPM we will get the Plan id (Unique ID for PPM) and then we will get the details of PPM accordingly.
    But, Please mention what about PDS and Transportation lane ?
    I mean from source of supply how can we know that the product can be produced or procured by PPM or PDS or Transportation lane ? Any field indicator is there for PPM or PDS or Transportation lane? Because in my requirement, First i need to check which one is active for the entered product:- PPM or PDS.
    (2) Once we know that the source of supply is PPM or PDS or transaportation lane, then we will call different FMs to get the details.
    For PPM we know how to proceed. I mean using planid we can get the details.
    But for PDS and Transaportation lane please mention the FM name and i/p parameters to get the details like setup group id, production rate etc.
    Thnaks once again for your valuable inputs.
    Deb

  • MRS (Multi Resource Scheduling) - Show operation status in Planning Board

    Because the current MRS thread is some long and complicated I chose to move this question into a seperate thread:
    Initial question:
    Like many companies, it is not unusual at my customer for their Planners to create orders with multiple operations, particularly since many orders require different crafts to perform the work. When the Planning Board is launched and Planners lok at work scheduled for the past week they want to be able to see at a glance which operations have been completed and which operations, perhaps from the same order, have not and may need to be rescheduled. Their preference is to select "final confirmation" when using transaction IW41 and thereby set the operation system status to CNF when the work on an operation has been completed. They then want to somehow use this CNF operation status to drive something visual in the graphical Demand layout display and Resource layout display to enable the Planner to see at a glance that the operation has been completed. I've tried several approaches with configuration of abstract statuses and the user interface profile without success. My customer's interest in being able to see the completion status of an operation in the MRS Planning Board makes a lot of sense to me. I'm hoping someone can help me with a technique for modifying the Planning Board so that it displays the completion status of an operation in a visual way.
    Response from Varun Verma:
    Hi Mark,
    The problem at your customers end is nothing new.
    What you can do ( many other customers have done it in similar way ) is:
    1) you integrate the status CNF into MRS.
    Check the customizing: Basic Settings -> Assign ERP Objects -> Status
    2) configure in MRS that for status CNF, the assignments and demands (only in item work list or Hotlist) is colored to GREEN (or any other color)
    Check customizing: Set Up Scheduler Workplace -> Workplace Profiles -> Define User Interface Profiles
    Thus the users will know visually, that the green colored assignments are already completed.
    By the way, in your work list you can also filter the demands based on their status
    Regards
    Varun.
    Followup question:
    Varun,
    Thanks for the response.  I thought I had tried this but perhaps it's because in the UI profile I had not entered something in both the status groups for assignments and the status groups for demands.  I have a bit more testing to do but it appears that the demand status now gets updated from the operation status of PCNF (linked to abstract status WORK_START) and CNF (linked to abstract status WORK_STOP).  I also get a red bar (C4) for PCNF and a green bar (C1) for CNF.  Do you have a better status group I should be using in place of C1 and C4?  Status groups C1 and C4 give me a bar but it doesn't look like the demand bar with a outline and alphanumeric description of the demand, it's just a colored bar.
    I know the work list can be filtered based on their MRS "planning" status, however, it doesn't appear to permit filtering by the status of the operation unless I add the operation status as an additional field in the worklist.  Is there something I'm missing here?  And even if it did, my customer wants to be able to see the CNF status indication in the Demand layout and schedule using the work centers so the worklist is not being shown like it is in the Resource layout.
    Mark
    Edited by: Mark Scott on Aug 10, 2009 3:35 PM

    Hi Mark,
    Well I assumed that you have confirmations integration active !! But I guess not because you say that the status is not integrated always.
    What you need to do:
    1) I assume you have SP05 or later.
    2) Implement the user exit: CONFPM05. In the implementation of this exit you need to call FM: /MRSS/RSG_PM_ORDER_CONFIRM
    3) Go to customizing: Basic Settings --> Assign ERP Objects --> Status
      -- Here, define an abstract status (MRS Status) for confirmed and partially confirmed
      -- map it to R3 status CNF and PCNF.
    After this, whenever you enter confirmation for PM order from transaction IW41, the status will be integrated.
    Now you can use the MRS statuses defined in step 3 to configure the colors.
    Implementing the user exit CONFPM05 might require some technical input. But it is easy. Just a few double clicks and copy paste.
    Contact an ABAP developer for the same.
    This should solve your issue.
    Regards
    Varun

  • Follow up to MRSS planning board how to populate

    Thanks for teh reply Varun. It was correct as I did not knwo that the create/save populate teh planning board data via the BADi.
    However 3 of the 4 added fields TPLNR, ABCKZ,  and ILARTa re being populated in the Order Change (IW32) transaction but the field called Remaining Work field OFMNW_2 is not. It is generally calculated when teh actual work in teh IW41 confirmation is changed to less than planned. I.E. if the planned work was 8 and the operator puts 4 in actual work, then the IW41 screen shows remeaining work field filled in with the difference (4).
    How can I populate this field via the BADi implementation PUSH_TO_MRS method.  I tried to link the user exit for confirmation save (Enhancement CONFPM05, user exit EXIT_SAPLCORF_005 INCLUDE ZXCOFU05) to then invoke the instance of the class method call in the user exit after saving the remaing work field in an EXPORT to MEMORY ID:
    Here is the code in the user exit that then fires off the BADI implementaion method PUSH_TO_MRS
    read table AFRUD_TAB index 1.
    EXPORT AFRUD_TAB-ISMNW to memory id 'z_OFMNW'.
    data z_ZCL_IM_MRSS_RSG_PM_INT type ref to ZCL_IM_MRSS_RSG_PM_INT.
    data zheader type BAPI_ALM_ORDER_HEADER_E.
    data wa_zCT_INFO type line of /MRSS/T_DEM_INFO_EXT_TAB.
    DATA: Z_DEM_H type /MRSS/T_DEM_H_EXT_TAB,
          zCT_ADM type /MRSS/T_DEM_ADM_WRK_EXT_TAB,
          zCT_PLR type /MRSS/T_DEM_PLR_EXT_TAB,
          zCT_PLRS type /MRSS/T_DEM_PLRS_EXT_TAB,
       zCT_INFO type /MRSS/T_DEM_INFO_EXT_TAB,
          zCT_TOOL type /MRSS/T_DEM_TOOL_EXT_TAB,
          zCT_RELAT type /MRSS/T_DEM_RELAT_EXT_TAB,
          zCT_QUALIF type /MRSS/T_QUALIF_REQ_DEM_EXT_TAB,
          zCT_ASSIGNMENT type /MRSS/T_***_KEY_EXT_TAB,
          zCT_STATUS type /MRSS/T_DEM_STATUS_EXT_TAB,
          zCT_PARTNER type /MRSS/T_DEM_PARTNER_EXT_TAB,
          zCT_OPERATIONS type /MRSS/T_DEM_OPERATION_TAB.
                                                                                    create object z_ZCL_IM_MRSS_RSG_PM_INT.
    z_zcl_im_mrss_rsg_pm_int->/mrss/if_ex_rsg_pm_int~push_to_mrs(
       EXPORTING
         is_header     = zheader
       changing
         ct_dem_h      = Z_DEM_H
         ct_adm        = zCT_ADM
         ct_plr        = zCT_PLR
         ct_plrs       = zCT_PLRS
         ct_info       = zCT_INFO
         ct_tool       = zCT_TOOL
         ct_relat      = zCT_RELAT
         ct_qualif     = zCT_QUALIF
         ct_assignment = zCT_ASSIGNMENT
         ct_status     = zCT_STATUS
         ct_partner    =  zCT_PARTNER
         ct_operations = zCT_OPERATIONS
      EXCEPTIONS
        failed        = 1
        others        = 2
    IF sy-subrc <> 0.
    MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
                WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
    ENDIF.
                                                                                    ENDIF.

    Hi Stephen...
    I think you are going wrong...
    From you post I understand that:
    1) You have implemented the user exit EXIT_SAPLCORF_005.
    Note: This is called when you enter the confirmation in IW41.
    2) Your understanding here is right that you need to integrate this information into MRS and you can do it from the above user exit.
    3) But you are wrong -- if you call the BADI here.
    Note: BADI methods will not work if you call them arbitrarily anywhere !! They work only when called in a specified program flow.
    The given BADI is called during the forward integration -- meaning when the order is saved. After the BADI is called MRS save is called and the data is saved in MRS.
    Calling the BADI method alone has not effect.
    I suggest that you read more information about BADIs and User Exits.
    Regards
    Varun.

  • Ability to display multiple texts within graphic planning board Gantt chart

    I have been unable to change the planning board Bar Chart Graphic Profile (OPG0 and OPG9) to be able to display both material text and a user field within the Gantt chart graphic.  I have copied the SAPSFCG011 profile and created my own.  The profile is displayed below from CMCH.
    Overall prof: ZBWSFCG011           SFC: View work center/capacity (3 graf.)
    ...... Select.profile:                     ZBWSFCS001      SFC: View work center -> cap.(3 graf.)
    ...... Control profile:                    ZBW___C002      Gen: Planning table
    ...... Time prof:                           ZBW___Z002      Gen: Medium-term (3 months)
    ...... Evaluation prof.:                 ZBW___A001      Gen: Standard evaluation profile
    ...... Strategy prof.:                    ZBW___T001      Finite scheduling forw./all functs.activ
    ...... Capacity planning table:      ZBWSFCL010      SFC: only main cap. (3 graf.)
    .......... Graphics profile                      ZBW___X002      BARC    1  Default profile 2 Capa. planning board
    .......... Chart sequence                      ZBWSFCT002      SFC: Main caps. (3 graph.)
    .......... Layout ID                                 ZBWSFCLA10      SFC: Work center view     (graphical)
    .......... LineRepresSelection                 ZBW___ZR02      SAP standard 2
    .......... Scale time axis                         SAP___M031      Stand. weekly per. split rough
    .......... Graph.object.select.                ZBW___OA02      Pool group order path
    .............. DStat Sq Structur Field na ROp Comparison val NStat Struct
    .............. 00000 01 KBED     TYPKZ    NE  1                      00001
    .............. 00000 02 AFVG     OBJNR    ST  SAP005         00000 SAP002 Standard operation partially confirmed
    .............. 00000 03 AFVG     OBJNR    ST  SAP006         00000 SAP003 Standard operation completely confirmed
    .............. 00000 99                   DEF                                  00000 ZJB000 Standard operation
    ................... Graphical object type               ZJB000          Standard operation
    ........................ Form type                           22              Plan. board:Graphic obj. w. ordNo matTxt
    ........................... Form group                          ZBW001
    ............................... Form definition                     PLTO22          Planning board graphic order and mat.txt
    .................................. Layout definition                   [[$a//$b]]
    .................................. Layout definition
    .................................. Layout definition
    .................................. Layout definition
    In addition to the profile change, I have configured the graphical object type ZJB000 (in OPG9) to look as follows:
    0     AFKO     Order header                          MATXT     Material description                                                                     
    2     KBED     Capacity requirements     A     SSTAD     Latest start / date     SSTAU     Latest start / time
    3     KBED     Capacity requirements     A     SSSBD     Latest scheduled start: Processing (date)     SSSBZ     Latest scheduled start: Processing (time)
    4     KBED     Capacity requirements     A     SSSAD     Latest scheduled start: Teardown (date)     SSSAZ     Latest scheduled start: Teardown (time)
    5     KBED     Capacity requirements     A     SENDD     Latest finish / date     SENDU     Latest finish / time
    6       AFVG    Order operation                       USR08    User field for date                                                                               
    I have found that the 2nd text field (USR08) must be added as the last step (#6).  When I had it as #1, the planning board did not display the USR08 value.
    Now both are displayed in the Gantt chart graphic.  However, it is difficult to see this long string of data as the bars in the Gantt chart may not be long enough to display the data. 
    Therefore we would like to use the "hover over" text which is displayed in the status line at the bottom of the screen.  We have tried using both the Info Text and the Quick Info options within the Bar Chart: Options Profile (OPG0).  Only the first text (the material descirption) is dislayed within either the Quick Info or the Info Text.
    Is it possible to have multiple object values appear in Quick Info or Info Text?  Or is it possible to control which text is displayed in the Quick Info or Info Text?
    Any help in this area would be greatly appreciated, as this is a make-or-break issue for the business to use the planning board.  Thank you!

    I'm also looking for a standard customizing alternative to do the same thing.
    Still, if you're interested, I've already done it successfully with user exit PLAT0001.
    Hope this helps.
    Best regards.

  • CM25 planning board

    Dear experts,
    I have been working on the CM25 graphic planning board. So far I have not been able to show if a production order is scheduled to be finished in time.
    Do you know if it is possible to show this somehow?
    I am thinking in two directions:
    1) The planning and scheduling log gives a warning message if the "scheduled finish date" differs from the "basic finish date" (also when it is produced too early). Can I change the settings of the scheduling and planning log?
    2) I know how to link different colors in the planning board depending on a user status. Is it possible to determine a status which compares the "scheduled finish date" and "basic finish date"?
    Are there any other solutions?
    Will definitely reward points!!!
    Regards,
    Tim

    Dear Rachael,
    One thing I learned is that CM25 is full of surprises. In the end I did manage to compare the "basic date" and "scheduled date" and assign different colors to them. Our customer requirements are converted via MRP which calculates the basic dates of our planned orders. As long as the basic dates are correct, the colors of the planning board will indicate if an order is still on time or not.
    The problem is that if a planned order is firmed or if a production order is created the basic dates will no longer change even if the customer requirements change...
    It turns out that we will be able to use this solution for our client, but I did not find a real solution to compare production with the customer requirements.
    If you need more info, please come back.
    Regards,
    Tim

  • DEtailed scheduling planning board - scalling of objects in the charts

    Hi,
    I am wandering if there is a possibility of changing the scale in the graphical planning board in APO PPDS, eg. in the resource chart. in the way that I could change the scale just for a certain period of time or one object.
    for example:
    the planning period choosen is 10.09.14 to 01.10.14., scale unit is hour, but the duration of some orders or operations is less than a minute. Woud it be possible to somehow change the scale just for 1 day or 1 hour within the shown period? zooming in does not help as then I cannot see the other lines that I need to look at when scheduling that specific order or operation.
    thank's for any helpful hint!
    br,
    Wojtek

    Hi Mike,
    thank you for responding to my query.
    I know the functionality with the right-click. this unfortunately does not help as the whole time frame is stretched-out => they cannot seen some objects, while the planners would like to strech-out only part of the shown period.
    I also checked the possibility of changing the scale down to seconds cause some operations have a duration of less than a minute (timescale editor = double left-click on the scale). But the production is still unhappy. They have seen in some software such a possibility and wish the same in the graphical planning board. they want to see just part of the time frame in another scale so that the objects outside the scale remain in the same time unit but the objects within the considered time frame would be displayed in another time unit.
    In the resource chart if you right-click an operation you can select the option shrink/stretch operation => I am not sure if there is sth wrong with my connection but most of the time when I click this option nothing happens. Just a couple of times while clicking on the same operation I manged to get a pop up "change operation duration" where you can define in % the new duration. but have to choose a new duration between "min and max duration" that are in this pop up zero => so I cannot change anything and have no clue where this zeros for min and max come from and in the end if that might solve my problem.
    br,
    Wojtek

  • MRS: PRT Tool Resource does not appear in Planning Board

    Hi Experts,
    I am trying to perform tool assignment but somehow the tool resource does not appear in the planning board.  I have the following set up:
    - Tool created as both material and Equipment (category P)
    - Equipment assigned to work center linked to Org Unit
    - Order with operations created with PRT assigned
    What I am seeing in the planning board:
    - I can see the operation with the linked PRT
    - I can see the HR resource under the same work center Org Unit
    - However, I cannot see the Tool resource.
    Am I missing somethng here?  Any kind of pointers would be greatly appreciated.
    Thank you in advance,
    Jk

    Thank you for your response, Varun.
    I do have the equipment work center set to be the same as the operation work center.  Also, when I try to add the PRT manually in the planning board, I get 2 error messages:
    "Resource  is not available"
    "Selected equipment 0 is invalid"
    Have you encountered this before?
    Thank and Regards,
    jk

  • MRS (Multi Resource Scheduling) - Manager Planning Board

    My understanding of the MRS Manager Planning Board is that it will only display those orders that have operations that have been assigned to a resource.  If true, this would mean that the Manager Planning Board would be of little value to an organzation that is only using MRS to schedule to a work center because there would be no demand that had been assigned to a resource.  It would only start to be of some value once the organization began to assign demands to resources.  Is this correct? Or, do you see other value in the Manager Planning Board for an organization that is only scheduling to a work center?
    I've also found that when I run the Manager Planning Board that the resources are displayed, however, I have to hit "refresh" in the Planning Board to get the orders/operations (demand) to display.
    Mark
    Edited by: Mark Scott on Aug 18, 2009 1:15 PM

    Hi Mark,
    As you already figured out correctly that the Manager planning board displays the resources (in display mode). It displays all the information about the resource: Its availability and assignments. since assignments are displayed, obviously the (related) demands are also displayed.
    If the fine grained planning ( planning at resource level ) does not happen, then obviously it does not make sense to use the manager planning board transaction.
    PS: As the name suggests this transaction is for managers who are not authorized to change anything but only for display. So they will see the resource availability and assignments in this transaction.
    Regards
    Varun

  • MRS (Multi Resource Scheduling) - Displaying Planning Board

    I've gotten the MRS planning board to function the way I want it in my sandbox, for example, when I run /MRSS/PLBOTIME the all the resources show up that are in the planning node the resource planner is assigned to and all subordinate resource nodes.  Also, the demand shows up.  I thought life was good.  I've now moved to my development box and configured the system the same as sandbox (to the best of my knowledge). 
    Now when I run /MRSS/PLBOTIME:
    1.  I get a popup window telling me that there are several valid resource planning nodes and requiring me to select one.
    2.  While the resources show up the demand does not.
    Now when I run /MRSS/PLBOSRV:
    1.  The demands I selected show up but none of the resources do.
    As I mentioned above, to the best of my knowledge, the MRS configuration is the same between the two boxes (e.g.,  work center types properly assigned, resource planning nodes and evaluation paths as delivered, user interface profiles, /MRSS/SGE_PN_MNT, etc.).  I can't figure out why the popup window is now showing up asking me to select a resource plannng node and, more importantly, why in one case the resources show up but not the demand and in the other the demand shows up but not the resources.  The only way I can now get both demand and resources to show up in the planning board is by running /MRSS/PLBOORGSRV.
    Mark
    Edited by: Mark Scott on Aug 13, 2009 8:58 AM

    Thanks for the response:
    /MRSS/PLBOTIME -->
    1.  What I had seen before in two other systems is that the org.units that are associated with me as the Resource Planner would show up, as well as all other subordinate org.units, both resources and demands.  In this system what I see is that the demands associated with  subordinate org.units are not showing up, only the resources.  I went into another system I have access to in order to confirm what I had been seeing.
    2.  Also, when launching the Planning Board using this transaction in other systems I had never seen a window pop up telling me there were "several valid resource planning nodes" and asking me to pick an org.unit from the list, it always just gave me the org.unit I was associated with plus any subordinate ones.  (We upgraded to SP06 last night and this morning this window didn't pop up, instead it gave me the resources and demand for the org.unit I am the Resource Planner for, as well as those for subordinate org.units....weird.)
    /MRSS/PLBOSRV --> Logical as you described is what I expected, however, what I was seeing was that the resources associated with the demands were not showing up.  After a closer look what appears to be happening is that the selected demands are being brought into the Planning Board but no resources unless the resource has previously been assigned to the demand.  In other words, resources associated with the work centers used in the operations (and their linked org.units) are not showing up in this Planning Board, they only show up if they had previously been assigned to a demand.  I can, of course, manually bring in resources once I'm in this Planning Board.  Is this what you meant?
    /MRSS/PLBOORD --> I followed your logic of "if I am responsible for the parent org.unit then I am responsible for the lower org.units also".  However, the logic escapes me as to why this only applies to resources and not demand.  Regardless, as long as I know that's how it works then I can deal with it.
    Mark
    Edited by: Mark Scott on Aug 18, 2009 9:57 AM
    Edited by: Mark Scott on Aug 18, 2009 6:18 PM
    Edited by: Mark Scott on Aug 18, 2009 6:25 PM

  • Planning board user status at operation level

    Hi Guys,
    Our user is not using planning board and therefore system status should not have DISP status as system status.
    Now user needs two profiles in the CM07 bases on the statuses SCH and RFS.
    Profile 1: For operation user status=SCH
    Profile 2: For operation user status=RFS
    I know how to create over all profile for planning board from the below path.
    IMG>Production>Capacity Requirements Planning>Evaluation>Profiles-->Define overall profiles
    Could any one please suggest me where and how to define required user statuses against the profile.
    Thanks,
    Lucky

    Hello,
    Please check the transction BS02. or Below Path in SPRO
    Production Planning for Process Industries>Master Data>Resource>General Data>Define Status Profiles
    Regards,
    Rakesh

  • Creation of invoicing plan while creating the PO using BAPI_PO_CREATE1

    Hi, basically I'm creating a PO using BAPI_PO_CREATE1 and then creating Invoicing plan thru ME22 using BDC.
    Could anyone please help me if there is any possibility of creation of invoicing plan while creating the PO itself using BAPI_PO_CREATE1.
    thanks in advance.

    Hi,
    Have you tried filling up the invoicing plan related tables of the bapi ?
    *"      INVPLANHEADER STRUCTURE  BAPI_INVOICE_PLAN_HEADER OPTIONAL
    *"      INVPLANHEADERX STRUCTURE  BAPI_INVOICE_PLAN_HEADERX OPTIONAL
    *"      INVPLANITEM STRUCTURE  BAPI_INVOICE_PLAN_ITEM OPTIONAL
    *"      INVPLANITEMX STRUCTURE  BAPI_INVOICE_PLAN_ITEMX OPTIONAL
    Regards.

  • Error while transporting Planning board profiles from Dev to QA

    Hi All,
    I have created planning board profile by copying an already existing Non-Standard profile.
    The Profile is working fine in Dev and i am able to see all the charts and Graphical objects as per the settings in the profile.
    But when i transport the profile to QA, it is giving error SAPBARC with text "Illegal number of columns in Chart". I checked what setting have been transported, and found that many of the setting have not been transported for the profile.
    Also tried to move all the profiles, thinking, there might be some dependcy among them. But the problem still persists.
    Awaiting for help...
    Thanks in advance..:).

    Hi Davis,
    Before transporting transformation make sure either of source or target should availble in target system.
    suppose you have a transformation between Data source and Data Target, first transport Data source, then transport Transformation along with data target.
    Before tansporting Transformation either source or target should be avaialble in QA system..then only transportation will happen smoothly..
    Hope this helps.
    regards
    SK

  • Automatic Creation of Maintenance Plan, Measurement plan

    Hi Pal
    Business : The equipments are procuring for the purpose of supplying into customers.It is installed (via sales delevery) at customer location as requirement. From  the installation date rental will start and periodic visit is applicable after every 3 months. The technician will capture  some reading In initail installation time, periodic maintenance time.
    Requirement : The equipment will be created automatically thro serial no when doing the GR(Its possible) . Automatic creation of Maintenance Plan for the equipment  for 3 month frequency, 70% call horizon, early and late completion of 100%. Additionally the scedhule start date need to pick it from the notification end date of its respective equipment.Also measurement points should be generated in automatic way (Its fixed& common for all equipments).
    Is there any possiblity to complete this requirement? Please help me and suggest.
    Regards
    Thenna

    There is no suitable BAPI available to create Maintenance plan.
    Try for BDC.

  • Factors influencing creation of a planned order

    Hi,
            What are the factors that lead to creation of  a planned order during a Heuristic run?
    When does a system decides to create a planned order? at what stock level? and how is the planned order qty. decided?
    I have a material in a location that has planned orders generated.
    I am trying to understand why the system created this order?
    There is no safety stock, safety days supply or target days supply or rounding profile  defined in Product master in Lot size tab.
    Lot sizing procedure is by period (Days)  - number of periods = 1
    Lot size strategy blank
    When I look at the product view,
    the requirements pileup with category SNP:DepDmd and after some days, a planned order is generated for some qty.
    I am trying to understand when the system determines to create a planned orders? What is the upper limit of the demand when the system generates a Planned order?
    In the system, some times the planned order is generated when the stock is at 2,484.567 PCs some times 13.645 PCs.

    Planned Order creation is based on a MRP calculations (net requirements planning) and ofcourse APO takes into account various factors such as min or max lotsizes, time-phasing requirements, calendars or safety stock requirements etc.
    Keeping aside the safety stock complexity in your situation, some of the reasons why a planned order could be created even with lots of stock in hand could be:
    1. Check projected stock on hand may be going down under 0 if the planned order were not created on time
    2. There would be a window of time for planned order creation due to production and other calendars that if lost would force projected stock in hand below 0
    3. the stock in hand is blocked stock not useful for planning
    4. Issues with SNP planning book configuration where key figures are not mapped correctly to ATP categories. Makes sense to double check in Product View
    5. Due to min lot size being high, it might appear that system is over planning production.

Maybe you are looking for

  • External hard drive for quick access to photos/music

    Hi! I have a 13" Macbook Pro circa 2009. I want to purchase a large and fast external hard drive that I can actively use. Meaning this external hard drive would become my storage for all photos and music, NOT just a backup drive. I want to be able to

  • Kernal Panic Help Please

    Hello,      I cannot find a fix for this.  I have been doing research off and on for a week or so.  Any ideas or directions in which to point me?  Any help would be greatly appreciated.  Thanks. Interval Since Last Panic Report:  27789 sec Panics Sin

  • FMS Auto Refresh when Field Changes

    I have a client who wants to see the Sales Order # (ORDR.DocNum) in their UDF so it is easily visible from every related document.  I am currently auto fillling the sales order number when there is a change in their Customer PO# (ORDR.NumAtCard).  Th

  • Syntax of COMPUTE_EXPR in target type metadata

    Anyone knows what's the syntax of that expression? I can do basic stuff there like calculating rate from cumulative counters. I need, however, to have something like DECODE or CASE to overcome huge negative values in case of counter overflow. If I ha

  • Changing account name under advanced settings

    Under Users and Groups: Under Advanced Options: there is the Account Name I would like to change the account name.  There is a warning that comes up changing these settings might damage this account.  Anyone have any experience with this being a prob