Short closure of PR

dear All
i have made PR with 4 qty , made PO with reference to this PR of 2 qty and done migo,miro of these 2 qty, now i want to delete  or short close this PR as remaining 2 qty are not needed now but system is not allowing the same throwing error PR already converted to PO ,also i am not able to change qty to 2 in PR pls help

Hi,
Please check the PR Status tab to check the total PO/GR/IR quantity.
As per the standard Procedure, system will allow you to change the PR quantity to 2 if you have created PO for only 2 qty.
Please check the error message you are getting whether its a standard or customized one.
Thanks & Regards,

Similar Messages

  • Short Closure and Permanent Closure of Purchase Orders

    Dear Experts,
    Our clientu2019s requirement is to close and block the processing of Purchase Orders for either partly received or no receipt at all.
    The following objectives for the closure of Purchase Orders :-
    1.     The useru2019s should not be able to process the Service or Material Purchase Orders after short closure of the Purchase Orders.
    2.     The Budget commitments for the undelivered Services or Material should get released after short closure of the Purchase Order.
    If a Purchase Order is raised for 100 nos. of a material/services @ Rs. 100 per unit, the total value of the Purchase Order will be Rs. 10000/- and GR has been prepared for say 10 nos, so the value of the GR will be Rs. 1000/-. The Purchase Order is now short closed for 90 nos. Then the following are the objectives to be achieved :-
    1.     The user should not be able to make a GR/SES for 90 nos.
    2.     Commitment Budget for 90 nos (Rs. 9000/- should get released from the Purchase Order.
    We have tried the following :-
    1.     Ticking the Delivery Completion Indicator.
    2.     Putting the Last GR Date
    3.     Making the Message of Last GR from Warning to Error.
    4.     Locking the line item for further processing
    But still the Delivery Completion Indicator, Last GR date and Unlock options are are editable to the user in ME22N and ME23N, where he can remove the tick and date and process the gr.
    Please suggest a solution to achieve the above objective.
    Thanks in advance.
    AJ

    Hi Adwait,
    Reducing the quantity to 90 nos. in the Purchase Order will help in release of my commitement budget. But the line item will still be open to the user for amendment and further processing. If the user amends the purchase order again, the line item can be processed by the user again.
    I want that alongwith the release of the commitment budget the line item should also be permanantly locked for modification by the end user.
    Please suggest further in continuance to the above.
    Thanks in advance.
    AJ

  • Short closure of released purchase requisitions and purchase orders

    Hello All,
    I've got 2 requirement from my client.
    1) Short closure of released PR:  Such documents can't be edited(closed) unless the releases are revoked. I have a doubt on "Change relase indicator assignment for the final approver to the Changable option".
    Would this option help??
    According my research, this would open the PR's and users may be able to edit the same and add new line items and this is a big risk.
    Are there any other options available.
    2) Short closure of released PO's : This requirement is also on similar lines
    Can someone please help?
    Regards,
    Manoj

    hi
    try with the changable option and version management for the pr
    in this case the pr will be editable after gr also and if user change the PR version will create for the same and user have to give reson for the change
    also you can try to go for mail to creator after creation of new version
    same can be done for the po
    regards
    kunal

  • Version asking for short closure of po

    Dear Gurus,
    My problem is for a line item in po when i go for short closure by selecting the delivery completed indicator . when i check, system asking for new versions, but it should nt happen i have checked for the field (ELIKZ-delivery completion) in version management it is not maintained for that field, then how can we resolve this please guide me with detailed explanation, checked in google but didnt find any suitable answer.

    Hi,
       Yes. Remove the flag for P (Purchase order) and test the scenario again.
    Regards,
    AKPT

  • WBS element short closure.

    Hi,
    I have one case where AUC cost is not transferred on Fixed asset in last fiscal year due to which it is not allowing Full settlement in this year.
    And due to some config changes the same WBS cost got reposted on AUC in this fiscal year.
    Now, First I need to reverse the wrong settlement done on AUC in this fiscal year.
    and then need to Capitalize the AUC cost in last fiscal year (This is not possible, as it will disturb the account balances and reported figures).
    Please let me know if it is ok if,
    1. I Reverse the worng settlement by posting JV of same amount.
    2. Get the remaining cost of AUC from last fiscal year transferred on new AUC created wrt. new WBS.
    3. Settle new WBS in this period.
    4. short close old WBS. ( system will allow me to close the WBS, as there is no remaining cost on it?? )
    Regards,
    Nilesh Pimpale.

    Try KB15N for manual posting.
    the process u mentioned is fine.

  • Short closure POs in Mass

    Dear All,
    I want to shortclose the POs against whcih are open without receipts or partial receipts for many days (say 90).
    Currently all POs are released and I can not tick the "delievry completed" option for that POs without unreleaing. Also though I ticks the "delivry completed" option after unreleaing the PO, system still allows me to make GRN against that line item.
    Requirement -
    01. Without unreleasing the PO, user should allow to tick the option "delivry completed" option.
    02. System should not allow to make GRN after the "delivery completed" is ticked.
    Regards,
    Rakesh

    http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/a5/63358343a211d189410000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
    "Delivery Completed" Indicator
    The "delivery completed" indicator specifies whether the delivery for an order is considered complete. This means that no more goods receipts of the material produced are expected for this order. The order then has the status fully delivered. If the "delivery completed" indicator is set, the open order quantity becomes zero, even if the full quantity has not been delivered. You can still post goods receipts for remaining quantities, but these no longer change the status.
    The u201Cdelivery completedu201D indicator has the following effects:
    ·        The purchase order item is considered closed, even though the total quantity may not have been delivered.
    ·        Although a further delivery is not expected, it is still possible.
    ·        At the time of the next goods receipt, the system suggests the item as unselected.
    ·        The purchase order item can be deleted, even if the total quantity was not delivered.
    Although the u201Cdelivery completedu201D indicator is not set, a purchase order item is still considered closed if the full quantity has been delivered. In this case, the u201Cdelivery completedu201D indicator is not required.
    To disallow further receipts you can set last goods receipt date, you can  set PO quantity to equal GR quantity and remove overdelivery tolerances.

  • Can I process vendor bills if the PO is put to delivery complete(short closed)..?

    Hi All,
    I have released PO#4500000001 for 2 units of X.
    Subsequently 1 unit of X is delivered in my plant against this PO and bills against the GR are not booked.
    Due to some undisclosed reasons, I have put tick mark to delivery complete indicator and PO has gone for versions, followed by amendment release.
    In this stage system is not allowing us to process the bills against the GR which is already posted unless the amendment is released.
    Is there a way out of this situation, where we can still process bills even if PO is short closed...?

    Hi,
       As I already explained, the issue for the error in MIRO is that the PO is not released, not because of short closure. It is related to PO short closure in such a way that the short closure might have triggered new version in PO, which in turn triggered new release. It is purely with your release configuration design. You may check the same and redesign if required.
       Please check the release characteristics in CL24N or in the configuration.
       If the release is triggered, then it has to be released if you want to further use the PO in subsequent documents.
    Hope its clear.
    Regards,
    AKPT

  • Service po short close for  project closure

    Dear All,
    My client has a project which is to be closed but there is committment in service po we have tried to set a final service entry indicator and final invoice still the commitment remains is there any other way that can be closed
    Regards,
    Reena

    Goto ME22N, block that PO line item (select PO line item and lock it), balance commitments will be blocked. Then system will allow you to close the project.
    with regards
    M Umapathy
    Edited by: Maripalli Umapathy on Dec 6, 2011 4:29 PM
    Edited by: Maripalli Umapathy on Dec 6, 2011 4:30 PM

  • Event structure freezing when short delay inserted

    Well, the simple stuff in LabVIEW I can do, but I'm still struggling to get my head around the concept of "Events" and how LabVIEW handles them. If I only have one type of event (i.e., pushing a button out of several on the UI, or reading a serial input and handling it programatically), I think I'm good. But my application requires me to be able to handle either of these at the front panel.
    Going through the LV Knowledgebase got me this link (it's a little old - LV8.6, but seemed to handle the basics), from which I downloaded "events.vi" (attached). My situation is a little different, so I modified it a bit to "EventExperiment.vi" (also attached) to have a bare-bones template I could use for my application. If I run it as shown, it seems to run fine (with a serial input, the "1" and "2" lights turn off, but the Bytes at Serial Input indicator always shows "0" and the "Serial Indicator" light never lights - I am assuming that these change and revert too quickly to see in the UI). My concerns with my VI are:
    If you add a short delay in the processing of the serial input event (say 1 second delay in that event case, or even a 1 second delay subVI after the serial flush connected through the error line), the VI accepts no further UI input after the first serial event.
    If you add an error wire through all the events subVIs (whether you merge this wire with the one going through the serial subVIs, the program just hangs up.
    And, one little bothering thing is that the original "events.vi" takes three presses on the "stop" button to close. I'm figuring here that it's because of those local variables being passed between loops, but it hasn't been enough of a bother to worry about.
    Your help is greatly appreciated,
    Cameron
    To err is human, but to really foul it up requires a computer.
    The optimist believes we are in the best of all possible worlds - the pessimist fears this is true.
    Profanity is the one language all programmers know best.
    An expert is someone who has made all the possible mistakes.
    To learn something about LabVIEW at no extra cost, work the online LabVIEW tutorial(s):
    LabVIEW Unit 1 - Getting Started
    Learn to Use LabVIEW with MyDAQ
    Attachments:
    events.vi ‏24 KB
    EventExperiment.vi ‏25 KB

    Well, I thought I'd add a final post for some closure to this one.
    To summarize what I was trying to accomplish: I wanted to have some kind of an event structure where you could use both regular User Events (button pushes, numerical control changes, etc.) and an outside (non-keyboard/mouse/touchscreen) event, like a serial character coming into a COM port, to initiate an action. This was to eliminate a loop where the computer would be polling the COM port continually at a pretty fast rate. (I must have read a hundred times in the past month that you don't want to run a While loop for polling if you can help it.)
    It turns out (after a couple of confusing days, I talked with the NI service engineers) that you can't do this. In order to detect a character at a COM port, you have to be polling the port periodically with a Read and look for a change in the bytes available or another parameter. You can do this through a timed loop separate from your Event loop or through a Timeout event case inside the loop, like Don_Phillips suggested.
    However, I believe I'll go the separate loop route, since my head's actually more comfortable with it than the Timeout route.
    Thanks, folks, for your help,
    Cameron
    To err is human, but to really foul it up requires a computer.
    The optimist believes we are in the best of all possible worlds - the pessimist fears this is true.
    Profanity is the one language all programmers know best.
    An expert is someone who has made all the possible mistakes.
    To learn something about LabVIEW at no extra cost, work the online LabVIEW tutorial(s):
    LabVIEW Unit 1 - Getting Started
    Learn to Use LabVIEW with MyDAQ

  • When I login on my When I sign in to a site on my ipad using my email address as ID a short cut of my email address comes up. How can I get rid of it?

    When I sign in to a site on my iPad using my email address as ID a short cut of my email address comes up. How can I get rid of it?

    You can edit keyboard shortcuts in Settings>General>Keyboard>Shortcuts>Edit.

  • Apple Mini DVI to DVI Adapter - Too short?

    I want to connect my iMac 2.8 ghz, 24" screen to an external Philips 190B LCD monitor and use the Extended Desktop function.
    The Philips Monitor model is the 190B6CG/00 and it is a single link monitor (Philips tell me it is DVI-D Receptacle Connector 24 pin = single link).
    I'm looking at the Apple Mini DVI to DVI adapter here on the Apple Store. It looks like it should plug into my iMac one end then the other end into my Philips. However it looks like it is too short to reach my Philips Monitor. They are not a fantastic distance apart. In fact they are sat side by side - but I somehow can't see the Apple Adapter being long enough (unless it crosses a 3-sphere).
    Presumably then, some sort of extension is required between the DVI end of the Apple adapter and the Philips Monitor's DVI input.
    Does anyone know what this extension could be and where is may be purchased?
    Regards

    Hello to everyone who has replied to my cry for help.
    Thank you all. I will apply points to everyone who has responded (so quickly too).
    Scorpie
    I totally agree. I have been thinking along these lines too. However, searching on the internet whilst researching, I found it difficult to decide what I needed because of the 'photos' supplied. They were ok as such but most didn't show very well the pin outs. Further research into the matter (and one website in particular - i.e. Maplin) made me realise that GENDER was involved. Also, with DVI, females look like males in web photos until you find a photo from the right angle. Same goes for VGA I reckon.
    I'm certain most people looking at DVI (and VGA) cable/connectors can't tell the difference when the devices are only viewed from 'above' . In my opinion they need to be viewed more or less end-on to show where they have pins or holes. I mean full end-on, not at an angle where (as I found above) detail as to pin or hole is lost in digital or compression noise. This is what I have experienced in all but one of the web sites I have visited. Another thing, most websites have an 'enlarged version' button which, if selected, shows the same photo exactly the same size. No help whatsoever. But then there's no doubt you must already be well aware of this.
    MyHighway
    You are correct. The Philips did come with a VGA cable. However I want to connect to my iMac digitally (if I can) using DVI (it looks like a 'female' connector on inspection of the back of the Monitor). I have found it almost impossible to tell the difference from most photos on the web even with my new huge screen iMac. One of the reasons I'm am a little nonplussed I think.
    mrtotes
    Good point. If I take a photo of the back of my Philips and take the Apple connector down to Maplin perhaps I can compare and contrast with real specimens. Yo!!
    I think I will give that a go.
    You have all been very helpful indeed. Opened my eyes somewhat.
    I wish a Merry Christmas to all my new Mac friends

  • Short dump 'Table does not exist in database'

    Hello All,
    When a report is executing it is going to short dump by saying 'Table does not exist in database'. As per the short dump analysis this issue is happening because of the following   Native SQL statement statement :
    Program :  %_T050N0 (This is a dynamic  program generating by SAP )
    Form Name :  DYN_LIC_SEL_TOT
    exec sql performing LOOP_MOVE_WRITE_ISAP.
    select single_plate, itm_num, ctry_code, model_lot,
    lic_hold_flg, qty into :dcat-lplate, :dcat-matnr,
    :dcat-werks, :dcat-charg, :dcat-holdflag,
    :dcat-qty from ZLICENSE_R2 where itm_num   = :p_matnr and
                    model_lot = :p_charg
    endexec.
    As per the customer this issue occurring since they migrated the SAP  back-end data base from Oralce to DB6. Here I felt that ZLICENSE_R2 is not migrated from the  Oracle to DB6. But as per the BASIS Team, even this table was not maintained in Oracle also. If the table was not maintained in the Oracle, this issue should have been there even before migration also.
    Following is the short dump details:
    Short text
        Table does not exist in database.
    What happened?
        The table or view name used does not
        exist in the database.
        The error occurred in the current database connection "DEFAULT".
    What can you do?
        Check the spelling of the table names in your report.
        Note down which actions and inputs caused the error.
        To process the problem further, contact you SAP system
        administrator.
        Using Transaction ST22 for ABAP Dump Analysis, you can look
        at and manage termination messages, and you can also
        keep them for a long time.
    Error analysis
        An exception occurred that is explained in detail below.
        The exception, which is assigned to class 'CX_SY_NATIVE_SQL_ERROR', was not
         caught in
       procedure "DYN_LIC_SEL_TOT" "(FORM)", nor was it propagated by a RAISING
    clause.
    Since the caller of the procedure could not have anticipated that the
    exception would occur, the current program is terminated.
    The reason for the exception is:
    Triggering SQL statement: "select single_plate, itm_num, ctry_code, model_lot,
    lic_hold_flg, qty from ZLICENSE_R2 where itm_num = ? and model_lot = ? "
    Database error code: "-204"
    Could you please  let me know what might be the reason for this issue.
    Many Thanks in Advance.

    Transaction SE11, input ZLICENSE_R2 for table name, and display the table. Did the table display? If not, that is the main problem.
    If the table displays, go to menu item Utilities -> Database Object -> Database Utility
    In the resulting screen, under the "Status" fields, you should see text "Exists in the database." If you don't, then the table exists in the dictionary, but doesn't exist in the database system. Click the "Create database table" button and then you should be able to run the program.
    You may need basis team's help to carryout some of these actions.

  • Short Dump while scrolling in a maintenance view

    A maintenance view has one field, defined as "Radiobutton".
    1) Select the radiobutton for one entry.
    2) Scroll down so that in the new page (i.e. the entries displayed in the new page) the entry selected in the first step is not visible.
    3) Select any radiobutton again corresponding to any of the entries displayed in the new page.
    4) On scrolling up again the short dump occurs.
    The short dump text says "More than one radio button is active".
    Any inputs in this regards are appreciated.
    Thanks.
    Gajendra.

    Hi,
    that means you are trying to make two radio buttons active.
    parameters: ra radiobutton group g1 default = 'X',
                rb radiobutton group g1.
    ra = 'X'.
    and rb = 'X'.
    in your case so obviously it will dump.
    check your coding..
    and show your code...
    Regards
    vijay

  • SHORT DUMP WHILE EXECUTING DTP.

    Hi Gurus,
    I have got a short dump while executing DTP the Error is as Follows.
    Runtime Error: MESSAGE_TYPE_X.
    Reasons for Error: 1.The installation of the SAP GUI on the present server is faulty or obselete
    2.There is a error in the application program
    And i have sent the sreen shot of the Short Dump to BASIS TEAM and they have replied me that they have to install some patches and it will take some time.
    But i have no much time and i have to someway or the other execute the DTP and load the data.
    Is there any shortcuts for this i mean to say without the involvement of Basis team that i can do in th BI System
    Regards
    Amar.

    Hi Amar,
    If the problem is with with System itself, how can we all have a short cut in that case. You may give it another trial, but you have to wait for the patches to be applied. Ask your basis team to get it done ASAP.
    Thanks..
    Shambhu

  • Please specify short text more precisely

    Hello All
    when i create a free text sc and reffered a material group GOA item text are same.
    sc description text = goa item text same (product category GOA)
    i get this error "Please specify short text more precisely" while creating a PO (classic)
    SAP options to make error message to warning message in ECC Version = 00
    Appl.A = 06
    No. = 474
    Cat = W
    what are the business impacts will be there if i make E to W.
    Br
    muthu

    Hi
    06474 is a MM-PUR error . It will also have effection to MM prochase order process.
    Error message 06 474 with item category W and M contracts occurs if the
    material on the PO has the same short description (text) as a non-stock
    item from the referring contract.
    If you change the description of your short text on the PO item (ex.
    text1) or you insert a material master with a description the error
    message will not appear.
    The error message that is generated is part of standard functionality.
    It is designed to prevent you from having a duplicate material.
    LMEPOF2B
    IF ekpo-ematn IS INITIAL.                               "371796
    IF ekpo-txz01 NE space AND ekpo-konnr NE space AND
       ekpo-txz01 EQ kekpo-txz01 AND
      ( kekpo-pstyp EQ pstyp-munb OR kekpo-pstyp EQ pstyp-wagr ).
       PERFORM enaco_2(sapfmmex) USING '06' '474'.         "371796
       mmpur_metafield mmmfd_short_text.                   "431879
       CASE sy-subrc.                                      "371796
         WHEN 1.                                           "371796
           MESSAGE w474 INTO gl_dummy.                     "371796
           mmpur_message 'W' '06' '474' '' '' '' ''.       "371796
         WHEN 2.                                           "371796
           MESSAGE e474. "specify the short description of the item
        WHEN 3.         "<   message not customized        "371796
           MESSAGE e474.                                   "371796
      ENDCASE.                                             "371796
    ENDIF.
    ENDIF.                                                   "371796
    The code listed above is where the error is generated. When there is no
    material master (EKPO-EMATN) and the short text on the PO (EKPO-TXZ01)
    is the same as the short text on the contract (KEKPO-TXZ01) and the
    contract is item category M (PSTYP-MUNB) or W (PSTYP-WAGR) then the
    error is generated.
    You can set the message to 'W' in SPRO t-code:
    SPRO > Materials Management > Purchasing > Environment Data >
    Define Attributes of System Messages
    I hope this information will help you.

Maybe you are looking for