Short term planning & long term Planning

Hi PP Guru's
! . I have scenario like this I am having many trading Plant and the requirements are collected and Sales person preparing VA31
Scheduling agreement for 1 week ( Short term ) also for 10 weeks ( long term ). In trading plant ( planning / delivery plant ) there
is no master data other than material master is Maintained in SAP system
2 . I am having Production Plant and need to address this requirement May be through SPk 40 .
   My question is How the requirement should I transfer whether i need to manually create manually PIR and copy into Production
   Plant or is there any other way to transfer the requirements from SA ( VA31 )
3. I want to adopt planniing strategy 52 - Planning without Final assembly because my Planning of certain SFG Procured externally
   should not trigger as per my FG requirements but as per my rolling Plan for 10 weeks for which I am PR having from MRP for
   Long term procurement material which is having lead time say 2 Months I am converting PR into PO using ME59N transaction with
weekly Lot size .
4. For Short term Procurement material I have lot size as TB which is having less lead time say 2 - 5 days max.
Could you please tell me using this strategy 52 how my PIR will consume and Reduce and in which stage . If i am doing PGI using
641 Movement type from Production Plant and PGR using 101 movement type .
5. For my Procurement for Long term with A class material how can I reduce my inventory may be space constraint and Cost
   Constraint how can I receive this material for my Production.
Marks will be awarded with Max for right answer
Regards,
jaya

Hi,
Hope you know the rules of the forum too many questions in single thread is not permitted.
kindly break them to get proper reply.

Similar Messages

Short, medium and long term planning in SNP

Hi,
can somebody explain me what Short, medium and long term planning mean in SNP?
Lets, say I have this scenario:
If I have a product with SNP horizon of 35 days, which means that the product is planned in SNP only after 35 days from today. Only PPDs deals with orders in these 35 days.
I have a 3 planning books
short term with 30 days from today
medium term with 7 months from today and
long term with 2 years from today.
When I say short, medium and long term planning in SNP what exactly happens in these ?? What do users usually do in these books?
SNP horizon is 35 days and the short term book is 30 days long, in which SNP does nothing. What's the use of this book?
Thanks.

When I say short, medium and long term planning in SNP what exactly happens in these ??
Nothing much from a technical stand point.
What do users usually do in these books?
Check the Time Bucket Profile for the different books. The short Term Book will be in days, the mid term in weeks and the long term in months/quarters etc. The different books allows users to see the keyfigures in different time-based aggregate level.
But if Heuristic is executed then behaviour will be different. Remember SNP Location Heuristic run uses the bucket of the data view to compute the Net Requirement and then try creating Receipts in each bucket within the time horizon of the data view using suitable master data. So if you run Location Heuristic in the short Term (daily) view then you will have many receipts one per day most likely. If you run in mid-term Weekly view then there are less number of receipts one receipt per week till 7 months. likewise for the long term view.
SNP horizon is 35 days and the short term book is 30 days long, in which SNP does nothing. What's the use of this book?
Maybe just to see the data. Location Heuristic run will not generate any new receipt.
Thanks,
Somnath

Capacity planning Long-term planning CM38

Hi,
I am using Long-term planning scenario. I have created 12 PIRs for 12 months from January 2010 to December 2010. I executed MRP in MS01 in Lead scheduling Mode.
There are 12 planned orders created for the 12 PIRs for the months Jan to Dec-2010. When I see the planned orders in MS04 the satrt and finish date for the planned orders are showing in respective months beginning.
But when I check capacity in transaction CM38, all the 12 planned order for Jan to December months are displayed in the month of January itself instead of the respective months from Jan to December and the work center is overloaded 199%.
Please suggest to solve this issue.
thanks and regards
Murugesan

Hi,
In customization for Capacity Planning you can define you own selection profiles to work with. You may specify further selection criteria in selection profile and enhance query speed from database. Slection profiles are assigned to overall profiles and overall profiles can be called by CM07 transaction. CM38 is also working over an overall profile which you may learn from SAP help. This can also be changed.
Also check OPC5 to limit max data for selection which might be useful.
Regards.

How to automatic post the profit OR loss to short term Capital / long term

Hi,
How to automatic post the profit OR loss to Short term Capital gain / Long term capital gain on posting of Sales transaction ?
Incase the inventory item is less than one year older then the difference should be posted to the G/L of Short term Capital gain, where as if the item is more than one year older then the difference should be posted to the G/L of Long term Capital gain
Thanks in advance
Samir Gandhi

I don't think any logic can be used to reach your goal. How B1 system should post in such a fussy conditions?
In case the inventory item is less than one year older then the difference should be posted to the G/L of Short term Capital gain
How can you identify these items? An inventory is a moving concept like a river. It come and goes with all different ways even as to value and revalue them.
Please follow the common sense to face reality.
Thanks,
Gordon

Short term and Long-term inspection and characteristic

Hi all,
In the SAP portal, they mentioned about Long-Term Inspection with Long-Term Characteristic, and Short-Term Inspectoin with Short-Term Characteristic.
May I know what is the usage on the above and how to setup in the system?
Thanks
YY

Long Term Characteristics Indicator is marked in the Control Indicators Tab of an MIC.
Long Term Inspection is used when the Business Requirement is to do Results Recording after Usage Decision.
In normal circumstances, i.e. Short Term Inspection, system won't allow us to do RR once UD is given.
Best Regards,
K. Raghavendra Nayak

Tracking of Loans (short term and long term) repayment and LC payments

Hi,
I want to track repayment of loans and
payment of LCs (letter of credit) using Liquidity forecasting and cash management
I want to see when the loan is due (period with date) and when LC is due
in a report from the system.
Is this possible.
pl give details of the config steps to be followed for the same.
Regards,

Hi Rishi
This is Srikanth, I have a similar requirement where my client wants to track the LCs issued against import orders along with Margin Money details and Loans raised for the same.
Can you please provide me the details of solution you got.
Advance thanks for the help.
Thanks,
Srikanth

Use Reorder Point Planning and see VSE Requirements in Long Term Planning

Hello,
I would like to use reorder point planning short term and something similar to MRP planning long term. I am trying to drive actual production off of consumption and plan long term for capacity, inventory and BOM components. Our plan is to delete the near term forecast and leave the long term forecast in to show requirements for LTP.
I'm configured for Reorder Point Planning as follows:
MRP type V1, Reorder Point Planning with External Requirements
Planning Strategy 52
HB Max Stock Level
For the longer term forecast requirements I'm configured with:
Independent Requirement Type VSE, Planning without final assembly. This is creating non convertible planned order independent requirements.
The reorder point planning is executing perfectly, but how do I get the VSE planned order independent requirements to show up in long term capacity and inventory planning? What am I missing? Is it something with MRP type, am I missing an option in the long term planning setup?
This has been a tough issue and I would greatly appreciate any advice on this.
Thank you,
Wes
Edited by: weslaney on Jul 21, 2009 11:40 PM

HI
check the planning scenario in MS31 and the PIR assignment in MS31 also check the plant assignement.
Check In MD61 you have enter PIRs in simulation version and the same version is to assigned in planning scenario
Also check T code OPU5 for LTP setting for planned orders
Regards
Anupam Sharma
Edited by: anupam sharma on Sep 3, 2010 2:33 PM

Datasources for Long term Planning

Hi Guys,
Our client is planning to implement Production Planning - Long term planning for next release. I did enough searching to find out different SAP delivered Data sources and different tables that are involved in LTP but was unsuccesful. Can anybody guide me by providing the list of datasources and tables.
Thank you,
Regards,
Vamsi.

Hi Vamsi,
This blog will give all list of all Infocubes, Infosources and Datasources which are relted to Production Planning.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/12/c770376ec62c7ee10000009b38f8cf/frameset.htm
Hope it helps you
Nagaraju.V

Long Term Planning for Quotation

Hi
My client wants to plan Long term Planning w.r.t to sales quotation and not with demand planning.Kindly provide me the details steps.
Regards
P.Srinivasan

Dear shankar,
I'm not sure whether LTP can fulfill your requirement completely,but for such requirements generally LTP run for an inatice version
can show the capacity required for meeting such a demand for the mentioned period and also the procurement analysis.
For checking the split of requirements into multiple production line try by creating different production versions and maintain quota
for the same.
Check this link to explore more,
[Quota Arrangement in LTP|Re: Quota Arrangement in LTP]
Regards
S Mangalraj

Bifurcation of Short term & Long term Gains possible in Treasury??

Dear All,
Can anyone please let me know whether we can bifurcate the short term and long term gains in CFM.I require the bifurcation for tax & reporting purpose.
Please help.
Thanks & Regards
Ramesh Nair

Hi Ravi:
I ve been reading carefully what you suggest. what sap note # 1515125 implement is realy what I need for my Client about current portion of a long term debt.
But reading this note and the related ones referred 1515126 & 732499 I really do not know wich is the solution for my client.
The system status of my Client is EA-FINSERV 600 Level 0018 SAPKGPFD18
The afffected releases regarding note 732499 are
SoftwareComponent       Release            From Release     To Release    And subsequent
EA-FINSERV                        10                     110                   110
EA-FINSERV                        200                   200                    200                X
BANK/CFM                         46C                     463_20           463_20
The afffected releases regarding note 1515125 & 1515126 are
Software Component        Release             From Release    To Release   And subsequent
EA-FINSERV                       604                      604                     604
EA-FINSERV                       605                      605                      605
Obiously regarding what i mention I do not have TPM44 (is TBB4) and TPM15M
TPM15 only hs Product Groups Securities and Loans (not OTC tx)
At TRGC_COM_VALCL table there is no entry to set the flag "current portion of a long terms debt/assets"
So wich is the solution in my case? I will appreciate any help
best regards
Claudio

LONG TERM INSPECTION CHARACTERISTICS

can any body guide me my quality plan have short term and long term characteristics 0010 operation i maintained all characteristics is short term characteristics and 0020 operation all characteristics link with class i am not maintained short and long term
my query is i am not enter any values in 0010 operation i enter 0020 operation characteristics but once i done usage decision this characteristics not update for batch means if i maintain any long term characteristics in quality plan system should not update for batch characteristics
if any body done this business kindly revert me this is urget .

No need that all characteristic should have status '5'.
But the result only which has status '5' would be updated to batch characteristic value.
If a batch characteristic is long-term and required characteristic, the status would be '1' when first usage decision.
When you record the result for the long-term characteristic, the status would changed '5'.
Then you should save usage decision againg for batch characterstic update.
Regards
Luke

QM, Inspection Lot with Long-Term and Required Characteristic

I want to know if it is possible to print a Certificate of Analysis (COA) with a required, long-term characteristic, if the inspection lot is using the special function "Short-Term Inspection Completed". And then a special Usage decision is made.
Our dilemma is that we have materials that must be shipped for pre approval with a COA, before certain QM tests have been made, and we want to be able to print the COA, but the required flag stops us.
So, what we really want is to require the characteristic if it is one usage decision and not require it if it is a special usage decision related to a "Short-Term Inspection Completed" inspection lot.
We also, would prefer not to have multiple COA profiles to handle, this would cause too much extra data handling.
Thanks,

Hi,
I If your Characteristic , whether it is short term or long term, is not marked as REQUIRED characteristic then there will be sure botheration for you to perform UD w\o performing the RR for them. It will prompt a message, which tends to be warning normally. But the characteristic is not REQUIRED and is OPTIONAL one then there will be no message , no botheration.
But one thing is very clear that if you want to print the Result of some MIC or characteristic,
then
1. it must be recorded for the result.
2. it must be maintained in the COA profile.
At the other hand if you don't wish to print the result of some characteristic, whether it is short term or long term, don't keep it in the COA profile. System will not print it for you.
Regards,
Shyamal

DPM 2012 SP1 long term backup fails when protected server reboots

Hi,
we're using DPM 2012 SP1 with Short-term and long-term protection.
We use a daily short-term backup to disk and a weekly long-term to tape.
We are noticing that when a long-term tape backup is running, it fails when we reboot one of the protected servers.
Is anyone else having this issue ? I assumed the long-term tape backup will be created from a disk-recovery point.

Hi,
What is the detailed error code in the properties of the failed initial replica or consistency check job ?
Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread. Regards, Mike J. [MSFT]
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

Long term Battery preservation...

A genius at Apple retail told me this tip for longterm battery life:
don't leave the computer plugged in while it sleeps. It's cool to let the HD spin down and let the screen sleep, but down let the system sleep without pulling the AC.
He also said that when it comes thime t do a weekly calibration, that letting it dry up all the way is sort of a wives tale... In fact, its better he says to let it go down almost to 0 and similarly not to let it get to full capacity on the recharge (this is achieved automatically whenthe AC is in and the system is still awake. Basically the system tricks the battery into not charging all the way which for some reason save it in the long term.
Does any of that make sense, and if so are there any other means by which one can keep the battery lving and lasting longer (short term and long term suggestion welcome, many thanks in advance.

It seems geniuses ain't what they used to be...
1) You can choose to have the disks spun down when attached to external power.
2) I'll take the word of the engineers who designed the device and chose its components over that of an hourly guy in a retail store any day. By that I mean I'll follow Apple's published instructions on maintenance. It's not that they might not discover a better way, but I just consider them a lot more authoritative.
The whole power and battery area seems rife with folklore. Folklore and computers don't mix!.
Take your advice from the horse's mouth. Follow Apple's instructions and recommendations. They publish a great deal of information on-line. I have to believe it's generally well vetted by their engineering staff.
Randall Schulz
iMac 20" Core Duo; MacBook Pro Mac OS X (10.4.5)

Verizon's Long Term Plan

I am writing to try and save Verizon from themselves. I have had a Verizon Wireless Account for almost as many years as there has been a Verizon Wireless. I used to have four lines but a couple years ago my son decided he wanted an iPhone and at that time Verizon did not have a phone that could compete. I tried to persuade him to stay with Verizon on our Family Plan but he was determined to have the iPhone so he is now and AT&T customer. Even though I was paying for his phone service he was willing to take on the expense of his own account to have the iPhone. Now my daughter wants an iPhone but I was able to convince her that the Android HTC Incredible would be almost as good as the iPhone with better coverage and she could stay on my plan. She agreed to stay with Verizon and was willing to wait for the back ordered Incredible. When I tried to order the phone and upgrade my service I was told I would have to pay retail for the phone ($500.00!) which is not an option for me. I am not due for any "Upgrade" pricing but since I would be changing my plan and, of course, agreeing to a 2 year committment, I assumed that I would at least get a discount on the price of the phone.I was told this would not be the case.
So Verizon is losing my daughter as a customer. I will have to take a hit on my account because my contract goes through 6/02/11. But Verizon will take a bigger hit because my daughter is 27 years old and would have probably continued to be a Verizon customer for the foreseeable future. I am 60 so my foreseeable future is not nearly as long. And I am not sure if I want to stay with Verizon either. I have a land line (unlike my daughter and son) and I do use my cellphone for making calls (which my kids do not do so much) but even though I enjoy the better signal coverage of Verizon I don't enjoy being taken advantage of. I have been a loyal customer but I would like to think that my loyalty was appreciated by Verizon.
Most importantly, I think the short term profit that Verizon may be making on this decision will be far outweighed by the long term losses on the many young customers who are leaving Verizon. I have tried to keep two customers for Verizon but apparently Verizon does not want or need them. I believe that Verizon will someday regret this policy.

I asked to be allowed to do this and I was told I could not. This would have been an acceptable but it was not an option. By the way, the last phone I got from Verizon Wireless (Samsung Convoy) I paid full price on because I was not due for a new phone then either. I bought it to replace an LG phone that had difficult to use voice dialing. The Samsung Convoy was not functioning properly and even though I had paid full price and the defects were apparent soon after I bought it, I had to accept a "refurbished" phone as a replacement. In fact I now am aware that if you buy any Verizon cellphone and it is defective you will recieve a refurb when you get any exchange at all. (And they are pretty sneaky about this process, I might add.)
I'm pretty sure Verizon is doing ok on recouping on their hardware.
Anyway, the point is that I think it is short-sighted for Verizon to be churlish about selling smartphones to previously non-smartphone customers. Just bad business.

Short term planning & long term Planning

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for