Shorten bounding box in form widget...

I created a form, and deleted a few of the extra forms that I had added at the bottom of the widget. I can't seem to shorten the bounding box of the deleted forms at the bottom of my widget. Any way to do that?

JUst look at the different states of the form in the states panel. Perhaps an alert text has remained at its old position And prevents you from minimizing the form

Similar Messages

How can I add check boxes without using the form widget?

I would like to use check boxes for our facets for our search engine. You can see an example below. Is there anyway to do this without using the form widget?
PJM - Site Updates

It is not possible to accomplish this with the Muse's Form Widgets. You may need to look for other online solutions and fetch the source code and add to the Muse page using the Insert HTML feature.
Cheers,
Vikas

Can someone help me in building an interactive PDF form with dynamic bounding box?

Hi Guys,
I need to create an interactive PDF form which will contain images, text and fields.
This is how it would be laid out:
Header Image at the top.
Below that a Text Box with a question "Choose the number of licenses" and a drop down option from 1 to 10.
Depending on what they select, I need the following to be displayed.
The following should be encapsuled by a bounding box.
If "1" is selected. "Username: <blank field> Password: <blank field>
Then a button which says "Click Here To Login To Your New Account".
The bounding box should end here.. and I have more text and images below.
This I could achieve! But now if I select "2" I would need the bounding box to automatically become taller to accommodate two rows with "Username <blank> Password <blank>
The bounding box needs to expand or contract based on the number selected in the drop down.
Would love to here your thoughts on this!
Cheers,
Rajiv

If you were to look at the spec for PDF, you'd see that that is probably not possible with a PDF file.
But, I encourage you to ask this question in the Acrobat PDF Forms forum where the forms experts reside, and perhaps they could suggest an answer. JavaScript can be used, and perhaps that's the answer:
PDF Forms

The check marks in the check boxes I added to a Muse Form widget appear blurry.

The check marks in the check boxes I added to a Muse Form widget appear blurry. Is there somewhere that I can edit the resolution of these? Why would the default check marks be at the incorrect resolution? Could it be something I did when designing the form?
Thanks!

The checkmarls are simple images. If you scale up the check mark or look at it in higher magnification, it of course appears blurry.
You may want to replace the check marks by graphics of your own (perhaps scaleable SVGs)
Select a check box, open the states panel and see the different states; change the graphics for the desired state by using the "Fill"-command in command strip on top of the application window.

Form Widget box stays larger than needed

I may be doing something wrong here, but when I create forms in Muse, the bounding box that holds everything together is larger than necessary to include all of the form elements. The main reason this is a problem is that it makes pages longer than they should be, pushing my footer content too far down (as the screenshot shows). Is this is bug, or is there something I can do to fix this on my pages?

Hi,
go to state panel, click on state "Submit in Progress", you will the "Form message" at the bottom. adjust it, and the width will be fine.
Do let me know if you have any question.

Can an image in the slideshow widgets be moved around inside the bounding box as can be in a normal image placed into Muse (double clicking on a placed image gives the functionality to move the image around - as per Indesign functionality)

Can an image in the slideshow widgets be moved around inside the bounding box as can be in a normal image placed into Muse (double clicking on a placed image gives the functionality to move the image around - as per Indesign functionality)

Can an image in the slideshow widgets be moved around inside the bounding box as can be in a normal image placed into Muse (double clicking on a placed image gives the functionality to move the image around - as per Indesign functionality)

WFS Bounding Box question

Hello,
I've integrated a WFS layer into an Oracle Maps application and am having errors when I try to do anything that involves a 'bounding box' type query, like zooming, panning etc. A "zoomToTheme()" function works fine as this does not use the bounding box.
Looking at the logs on the WFS server (GeoServer 2.1.3) the request has this form :
      <ogc:Filter>
        <ogc:BBOX>
          <ogc:PropertyName>CCW:sssi_polygon/CCW:the_geom</ogc:PropertyName>
          <gml:Box srsName="EPSG:27700" xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml">
               <gml:coordinates decimal="." cs="," ts=" ">194769.23076923075,291076.92307692306 358615.3846153846,373000.0</gml:coordinates>
          </gml:Box>
        </ogc:BBOX>
      </ogc:Filter>However the WFS server doesn't like the "CCW:sssi_polygon/CCW:the_geom" PropertyName and raises this error :
   <ServiceException code="InvalidParameterValue">
      Illegal property name: CCW:sssi_polygon/CCW:the_geom
Details:
org.geoserver.wfs.WFSException: Illegal property name: CCW:sssi_polygon/CCW:the_geomIs this something that MapViewer is doing wrong or the WFS server? Looking at other WFS examples it seems that MapViewer is wrong, however I am no WFS expert!
Is there anyway that this can be configured to just pass through "CCW:the_geom" or even "the_geom" instead?
Any guidance would be very much appreciated.
Steve H

Additional info :
This layer works perfectly well in the Map Builder and looking at the request made by Map Builder it appears to be doing it 'correctly' :
<ogc:Filter>
<ogc:BBOX>
    <ogc:PropertyName>CCW:the_geom</ogc:PropertyName>
    <gml:Box srsName="EPSG:27700" xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml">
         <gml:coordinates decimal="." cs="," ts=" ">211511.8058591216,329532.7730012691 324247.2566166974,372875.7230012691</gml:coordinates>
    </gml:Box>
</ogc:BBOX>
</ogc:Filter>Thanks,
Steve

Effects change bounding box background color

This is a technical continuation of my earlier inquiry - to which I found a workaround but not the solution.
Create a document with a black background.
Drop a graphic with a transparent background, or a block of white text, on that background.
Print. You have stuff on a black background.
Now apply an effect to that graphic or text - emboss, glow, whatever.
Print. If you're like me, you have stuff in a noticeable dark-black bounding box on a less-black background.
Why?
Despite much discussion and suggestions of the obvious (match color spaces, use CMYK graphic, remove underlying black background, etc.) not one thing I ever tried eliminated this bounding-box shadow, which, oddly, does not seem to appear on other colored background, even dark ones. ID is doing something with the black background... but what?
This also happens when (as in my specific case) a photo with a rich-black background refuses to match with a black background of the same color build. The photo is a deeper, shinier, rich black while the graphic black is colder and grayer.
The only thing I can think of is that it's an artifact of my HP print drivers, so I'd be interested in seeing who can replicate this fault and who can't. ...thanks!

The full-rasterization technique in the original post fixes the problem, yes. I experimented with quite a few other settings along this line including letting the printer handle color and setting the mode to PS2. Nothing - as before - corrected the issue.
So what exactly is the problem here? Is ID sending badly formed PS code? Is there a bug in the PS3 interpreter? Or what? And is there any way to actually fix this, or is the ID-rastering setting the only way?
And, finally, is this only an issue on my printer, or will the magazine's page imager render the same fault? These are pretty expensive ads for the client and I don't want to see these lovely bands when the magazine hits my desk. If it's just my printer, I can live with the workaround. But as this is a high-end HP with genuine PS3, how can a RIP with PS3 handle it any differently?
Thanks for the workaround, in any case. I'd still like to fix the PROBLEM, if I can.

Edge detection between the finiteelement mesh and a bounding box

i have an finite element mesh ,i constucuted a bounding box which passes through the mesh ,so now i want to detect the edge of the rectangle which intersects the mesh and construct a new mesh which resides in the rectangular box.how to do this.any kind of help is appreciated.
P /------------------\ Q
A |---- |/---|-----|----|-----|--\--| B
|----/|----|-----|----|-----|---\-|
|---/-|----|-----|----|-----|----\|
|--/--|----|-----|----|-----|---- |\
D |-/---|----|-----|----|-----|---- | \ C
S /-------------------------------------\ R
suppose ABCD is FEMesh, PQRS is a bounding box,consider the edge PS when it intersect with the elements in the mesh i will get the pentagon element when i want to form the new mesh which contains the elements which are inside the box.the graphical represenation is not clear if you draw on a paper you can easily understand my problem.
now how to create a new mesh from the elements which reside inside the boxin which the left hand side of PS will be discarded and RHS of QR edge is discarded,so now mesh will have some zigzag shape i think.so please help me out how to solve this problem.

i think the figure is not clear , so i want to
simplify the problem by considering only one element
of the mesh and only one edge of the box.Okay.
suppose ABCD
is a 3D quadrilateral element and PQ is the edge
passing through the element.i will pass a function
with coordinates of ABCD and P (startpoint of
edge)coordinate and its normal vector,if there is an
intersection the function should return 2 elements
according to intersection
now we have element ABCD and an edge with P and its
normal vector,now we have intersection between element
and edge from p at X and Y, now the algorithm should
return AXYD as one element and XBCY as second
element.please help me out in solving this task.
Thanks in advance.I'll assume you mean 2D, planar, linear quad. I think the general 3D problem would entail surfaces and be much more difficult. If you use higher order shape functions the 2D problem isn't trivial, because then you might have more than two intersections.
It COULD return two points of intersection, but you'll have to be careful about special cases:
(1) The edge could intersect just one of the four corners,
(2) The edge could coincide with an edge of the element,
(3) The edge could miss the element entirely and not intersect.
You'll have to decide what to do in the degenerate cases. The sensible thing would be to do nothing and leave the element alone.
You'll also be concerned about mesh quality when you're done. Near degenerate elements won't perform well when you analyze them. Will you try to correct these after the fact?
What if you end up with triangular elements? An edge might slice off a triangle and leave you with a five-noded element. What will you do with those? Create two triangles to get back to a quad? It's not so easy. You really should look into quadtree meshing. There are more general ways to attack a problem like this.
What kind of physics are you ultimately trying to capture? What are you really doing here?
You've described the algorithm fairly well, even if you haven't thought it all the way through.
What's the problem? You'll have to write the code. No one will do that for you. Write some and come back with specific questions if you have difficulties. This is a Java forum, after all.

Clickable Bounding Box, Rather than Graphic

I have built a series of buttons that overlay each other to
form a map of a country. Clicking the correct country is the goal
for the user. The countries are in odd shapes. My problem is that
the square bounding box of the graphic is the clickable area. Can I
make only the graphic clickable and how???

Yes
You should change the "hit" state of the button's timeline.
You can put whatever shape you need there (in this case the
country's boundary) to become the button's clickable area.

Bounding box and 3D

I have an issue with getting movieclip's bounding box when it has nonzero z-property. Here's the example of code producing correct result shown on figure A:
var m : Meat = new Meat();
addChild(m);
m.x = 100;
m.y = 100;
m.z = 100;
m.rotationY = 45;
var bb : Rectangle = m.getRect(this);
graphics.lineStyle(1, 0xFF0000);
graphics.drawRect(bb.x, bb.y, bb.width, bb.height);
But when im setting custom projection center on container movieclip bounding box stays the same as in previous code but object is moved according to perspective distortion (figure B).
ar m : Meat = new Meat();
addChild(m);
m.x = 100;
m.y = 100;
m.z = 100;
m.rotationY = 45;
transform.perspectiveProjection = new PerspectiveProjection();
transform.perspectiveProjection.projectionCenter = new Point(0, -100);
var bb : Rectangle = m.getRect(this);
graphics.lineStyle(1, 0xFF0000);
graphics.drawRect(bb.x, bb.y, bb.width, bb.height);
Is it a bug or is there any way to get correct bounding box with custom projection center?

To report bugs, send a detailed bug report (including information about the version number of your software, some details about your computer, et cetera) to [email protected]
You can also submit bugs through the
feature request form if that's more convenient:

Rotation of bounding box ?

I know I can get the transformation info on a sprite to work out the position of a bounding box used for collision detection, but if the image is being rotated, how can I rotate the bounding box for a more accurate collision test.
the image is rectangular so a square(ish) bounding box won't do.

1. Are we operating under the same definition of
"bounding box?" My experience has always been that a
bounding box is the region in which a sprite is
counted as existing for the purpose of collision
detection. I didn't see any collision detection in
that code.
2. If we -are- talking about collision detection, I
will now (after review) agree with you that the
Polygon object doesn't have all of the functionality
needed. However, an object which represents a
bounding polygon could be used quite nicely in this
situation, as it could be freely rotated internally
and fixed to a given point on the sprite.yes, bounding polgons are sometimes used - but the point of bounding rectangles, or bounding circles, is that they are cheap in terms of computation.
calculating in the intersection of 2 polygons is not simple, and not cheap.
Additionally, the most significant content of my post
was the corner detection; no two bounding polygons,
regardless of their orientation, can be intersecting
if none of the corners for either polygon is
contained within the other.yes they can, very easily infact.
not sure how good this is going to look /me tries some ascii art ;]
1
4oox xoo5
ox xo
x x
3xxxxxxx2
6
its 2 triangles {1,2,3} and {4,5,6} arranged to overlay each other (they form a star shape).
>
Am I misunderstood as to the purpose of a bounding
box? Let me know, please. :) Thanks!rob,

Text put into a canvas element with context.fillText() always has a black box where each letter goes. If the text is black you just see the black rectangle. If the text is not black you see it on the black bounding box. Surely this is not right.

This has happened on the last few versions of firefox, as long as canvas has been supported. I see other people's screen shots from canvas tutorials, and the text always looks normal. On my system, any text put into a canvas element via context.fillText() will have a black bounding box for each letter, sized appropriately for the letter. If the text is black, of course you only see rectangles. If the text is a contrasting color, then you can read it, but it looks bizarre.

Thomas...same kind of crap here.
I used Custom Text - entered a sentence, hit return, entered another.
Set to 72 pt.
The default alignment is centred - I want left aligned text...the text start point stays at the centre of frame and the sentence runs off the edge of the bounding box.
There is no settings in the Text or Title inspector dialog to correct that!
Using Transform will not sort it!

Launching file open dialog box in Forms 6i

hi,
We have to launch file open dialog box using forms 6i within oracle apps
and store the file into the database.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
AZ

Hi azodpe
i have a solution(Source Code) plz give me ur email address
i ll mail u later.
Khurram

Bounding boxes appear in Acrobat after exporting from InDesign

Whenever I create outline fonts in my CS3 version of InDesign (I haven't upgraded to CS4 on this one program yet), I'm left with some very strange thin white lines surrounding some or all of the resulting letters that look suspiciously like bounding boxes. This never seems to occur if I don't create outline fonts, but simply embed the fonts and create a PDF using the Export command, so I have to believe the anomaly has something to do with this conversion process within the program. If I use illustrator CS4 to create outline fonts and then place them within my InDesign documents, I don't appear to have the problem. However, that's not a very desirable solution as it negatively impacts the fluidity of layouts and the ease of design, both of which I use in design for.
And yes, these small thin white lines do print, so the problem is far more than merely academic.
Has anyone else ever experienced this issue, and if so, how did you solve the problem (assuming you did)?

Sorry about that, I apparently forgot to attach the file; have done so now.
The method I'm using for creating outlines is simply to use the "Create Outlines" command under the Type menu within InDesign. Then I create my PDF files by using the Export command under the File menu and choosing the PDF/X1a option. 99% of the time I get perfect results, it's only when I try to make outline type that I encounter this problem. You'll clearly see the artifacts in question in the example attached.
I don't know whether or not the press would have printed these artifacts, as you suggest, since no printer has been willing to execute a file that shows any anomaly in the proof process. I can't say that I blame them.
Hopefully you will see what I'm talking about and can recommend a solution, though I like your idea of simply giving them a properly executed file and then telling them to get a life. It hasn't worked so far, as I unfortunately deal with a lot of Neanderthals around here, but I suppose it's worth putting forth again the next time this issue arises. It will.
By the way, no print house of my choosing is this far behind the curve, if at all. These cavemen are always printers who have long-standing relationships with my clients, and for whatever reason (generally lowest cost I'm sure), the clients think they hung the moon. We, of course, no otherwise, but it does it profit a designer to tell his client he or she is crazy for using a printer who is a decade behind the technology curve.
We cowboy up and seek solutions, eh?

Shorten bounding box in form widget...

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for