Showing process in tracking list for specific user

Hello
I have a process in which there are several Assign Tasks operations for users to fill out forms.
I want a specific user of my domain to be able to review every process instance that gets initiated, but I haven't figured out how to accomplish that without assigning the task to him. I've been playing with Task Access Control List and Delegation and Consultation properties, adding the specific user and group to the settings, but still can't view the processes in his tracking list.
Is there an option or workaround for his Tracking list to get populated?
Thank you

You can create Custom Search Templates to search for certain process instances initiated by
all users.
See the help manual http://LOCALHOST:8080/lc_admin_en/wwhelp/wwhimpl/js/html/wwhelp.htm?href=000373.html for more details
Nith

Similar Messages

Stop user creating process order with material for specific order type

Hey Team,
Is there a way where I can stop creating process order with material for specific order type says Z*. We are using ZNMA order type to create trial batch and we do not want to create process order with material for this order type.
Any ideas?
Thanks
Bhavesh Patel.

You can restrict the order creation in CO01 based on authorization, Remove the authorization for Z order type for the particular user, Check with your basis Guy

E52 bug list for advanced users

I wanted to start the compilation of a bug list for advanced users. Here is my first suggestion:
1. SMS Functionality:
When trying to send SMS to a distribution list, the phone interface will ask you to choose between number and email addresses, even though the phone does understand that this is a SMS and not an email ("Text Message" appering on top)
This happens even when the contact has one phone number only (and an email address) in the phonebook
This does not happen when you use PC Suite to do the same task
2. Mail for Exchange client:
I will not go through the many -most already reported- bugs and general instability of the client. However, I will mention two that I have not seen reported anywhere so far:
When forwarding emails, only the header (From/To/Date/Subject) is forwarded. The rest of the text, as well as possible atachments are not forwarded. This is happening -to my epxerience- every time you try to forward an email
The client doesn't provide information (like the previous, installable client for devices such as E51, E71, etc.) as to when was the last time that sync took place, while it also doesn't show a real-time progress like the previous one. These two functionalities were very useful for controlling the Mail for Exchange process and understanding proactively if there was an issue. I consider these a must for any Business user (going through the log files to understand the same thing is obviously utterly impractical)
The client doesn't synchronise the "Deleted Items" folder from the mail server but only locally (which means it includes emails that were deleted only from the device itself).
The synchronization of the folders other than "Inbox" should be happening ad-hoc whenever the user is accessing these folders and requesting a sunchronization. Otherwise, we see the phenomenon of extremely lengthy synchronizations
3. Screen/Display:
It would be nice, when using the smallest font, to also accordingly compress the menu choices, in order to be able to fit more on the screen. Otherwise, with the present implementation, the fonts get smaller, but the relevant menu icons are not, resulting in an assymetrical look
4. Ovi suite:
As a general comment, I would like to mention that -apart from totally unknown NOKIA policy with regards to Ovi vis-a-vis PC Suite- it is not appropriate for Ovi to contain less functionality than PC Suite (I am referring to SMS presentation, etc.). In general, I find Ovi much clunkier and more clumsy than PC Suite which has actually evolved well over the years as the absolute PC phone tool (and still a differentiator for Nokia). So, NOKIA, please do not screw up PC Suite for something that may be "hype" accoridng to you, but is used as a tool by many of your customers.
5. Log:
As in previous phones/firmware versions, when setting the Log to 30 days, only 7 or ten days are actually retained. Maybe related to phone memory, but in any case it is a nuissance
6. SMS/VMs/Missed calls notifications:
This is not a bug, but at least personally, I preffered the way the SMS/VMs/Missed calls notifications were displayed in the previous devices (E51, etc.), just below the active stand-by applications "ribbon", instead of at the bottom of the screen. The new implementation makes it harder to access these items than before (at least for me)
I appeal to NOKIA to consider and fix these issues in the next firmware release(s).
Timos Tsokanis

@Timos , great compilation. I hope Nokia will work to resolve these quickly.
I have been using phone since last 2-3 days and find few things in Email client really annoying.
Also I want to understand few settings in Email client (version 2.1.0). They have made settings too complicated.
1)Any folder except Inbox doesn't show unread email count in brackets next to folder names.
i.e. If i delete or move 2 emails which I have not read to any folder(Deleted etc) , then deleted folder should be like Deleted(2). But right now it doesnt show anything. Strange.
I have checked with E72 and this bug is not there.
2) I have Gmail, Hotmail and Ovi mail as part of Nokia Messaging. But only Gmail and Hotmail actually show up when I open Messaging. All 3 show up if I open Email.
3)What does "Download Notification" under Global settings do? Notification icon control?
4) Why my Name field in Mailbox setting is picked from account at email.nokia.com, also even though secure connection is Yes under server settings in email.nokia.com, for same email its No in email client.
5) Why I am not allowed to change settings in "What to sync" , e.g. Hide email older than
6) what do settings "synchronise new updates" , "timed sync" do? No explaining in help.
7) Setting ->Gmail(or any other)->Account settings->Account Info, why number is blank? Also please make this work with destinations support. Also connectivity setting should be in global settings.
Best Regards,
Suyog

Disable release flag in service entry sheet for specific users

How can we disable the release flag for specific user/s in Service Entry Sheet(ML81N)?
Can any one suggest?
arjman

Hi dear,
In the ML81N T code, there is an object M_EINK_FRG Release code and code grp.
leave it empty. and assign the Role to the user with whoom you dont want to release the SES.
In this process the system will show you the green flag and also allow you to release the SES but when you will save it the system will give an Error Message about the Authorization.
this will not allow the user to release the SES.
Hope it Helps,
Regards,
Yawar Khan
Edited by: 1234_abcd on Jan 21, 2011 12:40 PM

Find Label Missing in Advanced Search For Specific User

for specifi users FIND label is showing but some of the users in advanced search this find label is missing . top of the applictaion it is there
plz let me know why this is problem is coming
find button should visible to all users......................
give me repaly ASAP

Hi
CRM 5.0
its not related to application,modification ..but my problem is the find label is working for some of the users.but some of the users find label is not there,
plz let me know where i have to make corrections for this problem........

Offline folders exclusion list for specific folders

Hello
First at all i apologize for my english.
we are trying around with the offline folders with windows 7 enterprise (x64) and server 2008R2 standard.
The synchronisation was set by GPO and it works.
Today we got the task that the user should only be able to synchronize files and not whole folders (with subfolders and all files in it).
Is it possbile to set an option (like the exclusion list for specific file types) to exclude folders from synchronizing?
Kind Regards
Luca

> Is it possbile to set an option (like the exclusion list for specific
> file types) to exclude folders from synchronizing?
Short answer: No.
(ok, you can exclude shares from being avail offline, but that was not
your question :))
Martin
Mal ein
GUTES Buch über GPOs lesen?
NO THEY ARE NOT EVIL, if you know what you are doing:
Good or bad GPOs?
And if IT bothers me - coke bottle design refreshment :))

Log transactions for specific users

Hi, How can I get the log for specific users, such as SAP_ALL : I want to know which transactions they have accessed in the last month for example or if they have accessed to a specific transaction.
Thks !

Hi,
try tranction ST03N (Workload Monitor)and select "User Profile" in the Analysis View. There, you can see a list of Users. Double click on any of them to see the accessed transactions.
Kind regards
Dirk

Need SP_TN for specific user must use specific document series and warehouse in Marketing Documents

Hi experts,
   I need SP_TN for specific user must use specific document series and warehouses in Marketing Documents SAP B1.
   Kindly give solution ASAP.
Thanks in advance

Hi Nagarajan,
   It show (1) Not allowed to add PO.
   I used the following SP
IF @object_type = '22' AND @transaction_type IN (N'A',N'U')
BEGIN
IF Exists
(SELECT T0.DocEntry FROM POR1 T0 INNER JOIN OPOR T1 ON T0.DocEntry = T1.DocEntry
WHERE T1.DocType = 'I' AND T1.Series = '142' OR T1.Series = '145' AND T0.[WhsCode] = 'STEX-01'
or T0.[WhsCode] = 'STNEX-01' and T1.[UserSign] ='1'
and T1.docentry = @list_of_cols_val_tab_del)
BEGIN
SELECT @error = 1
SELECT @error_message = 'Not allowed to add PO'
END
END
warm regards,
Guhan

How can i open period for specific user in OB52.

Hi Expert,
How can i open period for specific user in OB52. As 'Authorisation Group' field is there in OB52, how can i use this field to restrict the specific user to post for particular period. How can i creat authorisation group and where can i assign it to the particular user...
Please let me know?
Thanks and regards,
Sam.

Hi,
Here is the detailed process as outlined in SAP help.
Procedure
If only a limited set of users is to be able to post in a particular posting period, proceed as follows:
Add the posting period authorization (authorization object F_BKPF_BUP) to the authorizations of the selected users. Assign an authorization group (e.g. '0001').
Enter the account type '+' for the posting period variant to which the restriction is to apply. Enter the period(s) whose use is to be restricted in the first period, those which are available to all users in the second period, and the authorization group (e.g. '0001') in the last column.
Examples
A posting period can be successively restricted. If, e.g. 10 users have the posting period authorization with authorization group '0001', and 3 of these 10 users also with authorization group '0002'.
If the period is only to be accessible to the 10 selected users the authorization group '0001' is entered in the posting period variant. Access can later be restricted to the remaining 3 users by entering '0002'.
Thanks
Venkata Ganesh Perumalla

Hide The Content Reference from Portal For specific users.

Hello Everyone
I am new to peoplesoft and want to hide the content reference from the main portal for specific users
Can anyone help me on this?
Thanks in advance...

the users should have roles which do not contain the permission lists to which your current component is added.
This is the way security is maintained!
Vikas

How to apply Software Restriction policy for specific user in local group policy object ?

I am working on implementing user based software restriction policy programmatically for local group policy object.
If i create a policy through Domain Controller,i do have option for software restriction policy in user configuration but in local group policy editor i don't have option for that.
When i look for the changes made by policy applied from Domain Controller in registry, they modifies registry values for specific users on path HKEY_USERS\(SID of User)\Softwares\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\Safer\Codeidentifiers
They also have registry.pol stored in SYSvol folder in Domain Controller. When i make the same changes in registry to block any other application, application is getting blocked.
I achieved what i wanted but is it right to modify registry values ?
PS:- I am using Igrouppolicyobject API

I achieved what I wanted but is it right to modify registry values ?
You also can modify a registry programmatically based policy. Check this:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/dsadsi/archive/2009/07/23/working-with-group-policy-objects-programmatically-simple-c-example-illustrating-how-to-modify-a-registry-based-policy.aspx
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

FindGroups - Error while getting group list for login user

Hi All,
I am using below code snippet to search a group in OIM but it gives me "Error while getting group list for login user" error message.
tcResultSet rsetAss = null;
tcGroupOperationsIntf groupIntf = (tcGroupOperationsIntf)utilFactory.getUtility("Thor.API.Operations.tcGroupOperationsIntf");
HashMap mapGrp = new HashMap();
mapGrp.put("Groups.Group Name","DEF_GROUP");
rsetAss = groupIntf.findGroups(mapGrp);
And i am ruuning this code using xelsysadm logon.
com.thortech.xl.util.config.ConfigurationClient.ComplexSetting config = ConfigurationClient.getComplexSettingByPath("Discovery.CoreServer");
Hashtable env = config.getAllSettings();
com.thortech.xl.crypto.tcSignatureMessage moSignature = tcCryptoUtil.sign("xelsysadm", "PrivateKey");
utilFactory = new tcUtilityFactory(env, moSignature);
Any guess?
Thanks & Regards
Inbaa.

Here it is Rajiv,
public class GetUserApprover {
private String defGroup = "DEF_GROUP";
public tcUtilityFactory getUtilFactory()
tcUtilityFactory utilFactory = null;
try
     logger.debug("Initializing the utilFactory");
     com.thortech.xl.util.config.ConfigurationClient.ComplexSetting config = ConfigurationClient.getComplexSettingByPath("Discovery.CoreServer");
Hashtable env = config.getAllSettings();
com.thortech.xl.crypto.tcSignatureMessage moSignature = tcCryptoUtil.sign("xelsysadm", "PrivateKey");
utilFactory = new tcUtilityFactory(env, moSignature);
catch(Exception ex)
     logger.info("Error while getting the utilFactory" + ex.getMessage());
     System.out.println(ex.getMessage());
return utilFactory;
public String getGroupKey(String defGroup){
          String groupKey = null;
          tcUtilityFactory utilFactory = getUtilFactory();
          if(utilFactory != null)
     System.out.println("utilFactory not null. Searching for group:" +defGroup );
               try
          tcResultSet rsetAss = null;
          tcGroupOperationsIntf groupIntf = (tcGroupOperationsIntf)utilFactory.getUtility("Thor.API.Operations.tcGroupOperationsIntf");
          HashMap mapGrp = new HashMap();
          mapGrp.put("Groups.Group Name","DEF_OWNER_GROUP");
          System.out.println("Finding Group....");
          rsetAss = groupIntf.findGroups(mapGrp);
          System.out.println("RowCount-->" +rsetAss.getRowCount() );
          rsetAss.goToRow(0);
          groupKey = rsetAss.getStringValue("Groups.Key");
     System.out.println("GroupKey-->" + groupKey);
     catch(Exception e){
          System.out.println("Error" + e.getMessage());
          return (java.lang.Object)groupKey;
}

After a quiz can you show the questions and answers for the user to review from passing the quiz

After taking a quiz, is there a way to show the questions and answers for the user to review from passing the quiz.
And the ones who has failed the quiz would be directed to the first slide again to take the quiz over.
Thanks

Rod
I see that information about adding the review quiz button but on that last slide where it shows results, I want it jump back to slide 1 but it jumps to the first question of the slide. Is there a way around that?

Locks list for a user session

Hello,
Is there a function module or class/method which will give me the list of all locks of a user in the current session and not across all sessions (like transaction SM12). Function modules like ENQUE_READ and ENQUE_READ2 provides the lock list for a user across all sessions but not in the seesion in which the FM is being executed.
Please let me know if you have any information in this regard.
Thanks & Regards,
Saurabh

Hi saurabh,
Dont post duplicate thread . Its against the rule of engagement.
Locks list for a user session
If you have got the answer in the previous thraed then close this thread.
Regards,
Sujit

Data Level security for specific Users

Hi,
Can you please suggest some ideas on by-passing the Data Level security for specific users or specific group?
Currently, we have data level security defined on a group permissions for one group and for people belonging to another group, the security should not apply and they should see entire data.
But, key thing here is that, the user belongs to both the groups.
Any ideas helps.
Thanks,
Chandu.

So you are saying you want a user to belong to a group with data-level security filters, but you don't want the filters to apply to that user?
Why are they in the group then?
Are the data filter defined with variables or are the hard-coded?
If variables, you may be able to put logic in initialization block to set the variable appropriately for specific users.
I'd rethink the security model - when I define data level security filters, I tend to force users to only belong to a single group/role.

Showing process in tracking list for specific user

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for