Simple Question- WS & Custom object types

Hi all,
I'm sure I found some posts on this topic before but cannot seem to find them at the minute.
I know in Web Services it is possoble to pass user defined objects, as long as they implement Serializable. But is it that simple? do you not have to define mappings and the like in the configuration files?
Any pointers to suitable material would be appreciated. Many thanks
Kevin

Hi Kevin,
I too have noticed that there are many posts on TypeMapping of complex types (I think it is mostly because people are not - yet - well acquainted with Web Services). Look at the "advanced"-JAXRPC examples in the Web Services tutorial and see that you do not need to map much. In the case of DII it is limited to the input-parameters and the result-type.

Similar Messages

Generic Object Services for Custom Object Type

I would like some advice please. I am not an ABAP Developer but I would like to enable the generic object services for transaction PP01 for a custom object type.
I have searched for information, which suggests that the object needs to be published using the function module SWU_OBJECT_PUBLISH so that it is available in the Business Object Repository. If this is correct, please could someone tell me (in simple terms) how I can do this (with the assistance of an ABAP developer)?
My colleague did some debugging which seemed to suggest that in order for the generic object services to be available, the field OBJTYP needs to be populated in table T778O. Is this correct? If so, how should this be done?
Your advice would be greatly appreciated.
Regards
Corinne

Hi,
i'm also looking for the solution you have asked for.
if you know how to do it please reply me with the solution.
Thanks,
suresh

New custom object type - SWO1

Hi All,
I need to create a custom object type using SWO1.
The object type needs to be linked to a report program with selection screen(or its tcode).
The selection screen carries just 1field. The output is a new screen.
Would appreciate if any1 can tell me the step-by-step process to accomplish my objective.
-Ram.

Enter a name.
Hit create. Populate the manadatory pop ups don't populate super type.
Blow out the key field. Create a key field.
Blow out the methods - add a method. Add the code for the method - select the method and hit the program button add code as below:
BEGIN_METHOD RUNDUPREPORT CHANGING CONTAINER.
   SET PARAMETER ID 'VPA' FIELD OBJECT-KEY-PARTNEREMPLOYEEID.
export object-key-partneremployeeid to memory id '99'.
   CALL TRANSACTION 'ZEML' AND SKIP FIRST SCREEN.
*object-key-partneremployeeid.
END_METHOD.
Create your event.
My method calls an abap I wrote that is bound to a transaction.
You will need to set the release status for all of the elements of your object and the object itself.
The question I have is why. Are you calling the object in a workflow? If so you will need to use the fm as below:
DATA: OBJTYPE LIKE SWETYPECOU-OBJTYPE VALUE 'ZRM_WWCONT',
    EVENT LIKE SWETYPECOU-EVENT VALUE 'DuplicateEmail',
     OBJKEY LIKE SWEINSTCOU-OBJKEY,
        EVENTID LIKE SWEDUMEVID-EVTID.
    DATA: BEGIN OF EVENT_CONTAINER OCCURS 0.
            INCLUDE STRUCTURE SWCONT.
    DATA: END OF EVENT_CONTAINER.
    OBJKEY = KNVK-PARNR.
    CALL FUNCTION 'SWE_EVENT_CREATE'
         EXPORTING
              OBJTYPE              = OBJTYPE
              OBJKEY               = OBJKEY
              EVENT                = EVENT
        START_WITH_DELAY     = ' '
        START_RECFB_SYNCHRON = ' '
        IMPORTING
             EVENT_ID             = EVENTID
         TABLES
              EVENT_CONTAINER      = EVENT_CONTAINER
         EXCEPTIONS
              OBJTYPE_NOT_FOUND    = 1
              OTHERS               = 2.
    COMMIT WORK.
Good Luck.

Is it Possible to create custom Object type in configuration Tab

Hi ,
We have object type for table in Development Tab in SOLAR02 , is it possible to create a custom object type to represent the table object type in Configuration Tab.
Please let me know the steps , if it is possible.
Best Regards,
Saravana

Hi
You answer for you problem exists and its a common problem but you need to go for this development as mentioned below
/people/andreas.diebold/blog/2007/02/13/extend-sap-solution-manager-to-manage-new-object-types
We did long time back
Hope ur problm and doubt is resolved now
Regards
Prakhar

Updating a custom object type

Please, does anybody know how to update an custom object type which is created as table.
I did the following:
CREATE TYPE tmp as object..
CREATE TYPE tmp_table as TABLE of tmp;
Is it possible to update tmp_table and if so how?
Thanks.

Example:
create type address_ty as object
(Street varchar2(50)
,city varchar2(25)
,zip number)
create type person_ty as object
(name varchar2(50)
,address address_ty)
create table customer
(customer_id number
,person person_ty)
insert into customer (1, person_ty ('Name', address_ty ('Street Name', 'City Name', 1111)));
insert into customer (2, person_ty ('Name 2', address_ty ('Street Name 2', 'City Name 2', 1111)));
commit;
update customer
set person = person_ty ('Name 2', address_ty ('New Street Name 2', 'City Name 2', 1111))
where customer_id = 2;
Please, does anybody know how to update an custom object type which is created as table.
I did the following:
CREATE TYPE tmp as object..
CREATE TYPE tmp_table as TABLE of tmp;
Is it possible to update tmp_table and if so how?
Thanks.

Delegation of Custom Object Types

Dear Gurus,
What is the need for DELEGATING a custom object type that we create using SWO1.
Thanks,
VV

HI Balajisap ,
'the event 'releasestepcreated' has to be triggered for object types BUS2105 and the custom created for BUS2105 in SWEL right?. But i am getting only BUS2105 not the custom one'..
The system will always show the standard BO not the custom one. Afetr dlegating you custom BO to the standard one, use your standard BO to trigger your worflow. The standard BO will contain the cistom properties after delegation.
Regards
Anik

Design Question: Creating One Object Type From Multiple Inputs

Hi,
I'm attempting to expand my brain a bit and come up with a more elegant solution to a design I created a few years ago. In simple terms, I have a data object (Request) which can be created based on data in a text file or from data previously persisted in a database record using the Request object and associated DAO. Typically, the text file is initiating a "new" Request object to be persisted, and reading from the database is done to update or view previously submitted Request objects. Note that I have no ability to change the original input method of the text file.
In my original design I basically lumped everything into the Request class using multiple constructors which made for a messy jumble and a very long class. Different parsing routines were needed when data was read from the file vs. reading it from the database. I was considering refactoring the code to use a factory class but this doesn't seem to follow the typical Abstract Factory or Factory Method design patterns. In my design I keep ending up with something like:
public class RequestFactory {
    public Request createRequestFromFile(File file) {...build up the request object...}
    public Request createRequestFromDbRecord(int recordId) {...build up the request object...}
}And I would change the constructor in my Request class to private and remove all of the parsing and construction methods.
Now, I can definitely make this work but I'm not sure I'm really doing much except taking the creation garbage (there's a lot of parsing of multiple-value fields that needs to be done) out of the actual Request class. So my question is basically, do I have a better approach I'm not seeing or is this type of factory "appropriate"? I mean, would someone come along later and look at my code and think I was crazy? I'm still trying to wrap my head around some ways to use factories in my own projects so I'm probably not thinking clearly.
Thanks!
Pablo

Thanks for the feedback. About your suggestions on dealing with the different loading methods, I think that's where I keep getting disconnected, at least as far as using an abstract factory is concerned.
Extending your example code a bit using option one, I would guess I end up with something like this:
public interface RequestFactory {
Request createRequest(RequestSource source) throws RequestCreationException;
public class DatabaseRequestFactory implements RequestFactory {
public Request createRequest(RequestSource source) throws RequestCreationException {
    // do some stuff
}The part I can't figure out is how to define the RequestSource (or RequestId in your example). It would seem that if I'm going to define member variables in RequestSource like SourceFile or RecordId it would be just as correct to skip the interface and just use two concrete classes like this:
public class FileRequestFactory {
Request createRequest(File file) throws RequestCreationException {
    // process file and create request
public class DatabaseRequestFactory {
public Request createRequest(int recordId) throws RequestCreationException {
    // load record and create request
}I guess where I keep stumbling is a) the value of the interface and b) if I do use an interface, how to have a generic object passed to createRequest() that can refer to either a file location or a record ID. This concept is pretty clear when the creation requirements for each concrete factory are the same, but when the construction uses such disparate data sources for creation I can't seem to wrap my head around the differences.
Your third suggestion is probably the easiest for me to understand but it seems like it would be a bit contrived. In the end it may make the most sense if I am going to go with that type of approach since I still don't really understand how to implement the first two options.
Thanks again for your input.
Pablo
Edited by: Pablo_Vadear on Dec 15, 2009 6:11 AM

"Property value is not valid" when PropertyGridView tries to convert a string to a custom object type.

Hi,
I have a problem with an PropertyGrid enum property that uses a type converter.
In general it works, but when I double clicking or using the scoll wheel, an error message appears:
"Property value is not valid"
Details: "Object of type 'System.String' cannot be converted to type 'myCompany.myProject.CC_myCustomProperty."
I noticed that the CommitValue method (in PropertyGridView.cs) tries to convert a string value to a CC_myCustomProperty object.
Here is the code that causes the error (see line 33):
(Using the .net symbols from the PropertyGridView.cs file)
1
        internal bool CommitValue(GridEntry ipeCur, object value) {
2
3
            Debug.WriteLineIf(CompModSwitches.DebugGridView.TraceVerbose,  "PropertyGridView:CommitValue(" + (value==null ? "null" :value.ToString()) + ")");
4
5
            int propCount = ipeCur.ChildCount;
6
            bool capture = Edit.HookMouseDown;
7
            object originalValue = null;
8
9
            try {
10
                originalValue = ipeCur.PropertyValue;
11
12
            catch {
13
                // if the getter is failing, we still want to let
14
                // the set happen.
15
16
17
            try {
18
                try {
19
                    SetFlag(FlagInPropertySet, true);
20
21
                    //if this propentry is enumerable, then once a value is selected from the editor,
22
                    //we'll want to close the drop down (like true/false).  Otherwise, if we're
23
                    //working with Anchor for ex., then we should be able to select different values
24
                    //from the editor, without having it close every time.
25
                    if (ipeCur != null &&
26
                        ipeCur.Enumerable) {
27
                           CloseDropDown();
28
29
30
                    try {
31
                        Edit.DisableMouseHook = true;
32
/*** This Step fails because the commit method is trying to convert a string to myCustom objet ***/
33
                        ipeCur.PropertyValue = value;
34
35
                    finally {
36
                        Edit.DisableMouseHook = false;
37
                        Edit.HookMouseDown = capture;
38
39
40
                catch (Exception ex) {
41
                    SetCommitError(ERROR_THROWN);
42
                    ShowInvalidMessage(ipeCur.PropertyLabel, value, ex);
43
                    return false;
44
I'm stuck.
I was wondering is there a way to work around this? Maybe extend the string converter class to accept this?
Thanks in advance,
Eric

Hi,
Thank you for your post! I would suggest posting your question in one of the MS Forums,
MSDN Forums » Windows Forms » Windows Forms General
located here:http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowForum.aspx?ForumID=8&SiteID=1.
Have a great day!

Simple question about custom tags really easy!!

I am trying to make my own custom tags, so far i have created simple one that have i use for heading or to set the page layout for a jsp page, My question is I want to make a custom tag with a body , with a start and end tag can anybody give a simple example of a custom tag which has a body.
I do not mean write me a tag i mean what could a tag with a body be used for? Can you give me some example of what a tag of this kind could do?

Thanks having read that and some other pages i have another question:
would it be possible to put the following code into a custom tag so that i can pass in a list and have it output it to a table?
<TABLE >
<%
out.println("<TABLE >\n" +
                "<TR BGCOLOR=\"#FFDDAA\">\n" +
                " <TH>ID Number\n" +
                " <TH>Artist\n"
Iterator it = pricePassed.getpricePassed().iterator();
while( it.hasNext() ){
   MySite.VideoBean vids = (MySite.VideoBean) it.next();
   out.println( "<TR>\n" +
               "<TD><Center><B>" + vids.getRecId() + "</TD>" +
                "<TD><Center><B>" + vids.getArtist() + "</TD>"
</TD></TR>\n" );
%></TABLE>At the moment i use the above in a jsp to put data into a table, would it be a massive task to undertake to put into a custom tag?

Packaging custom Objects TYPE

Hello everybody,
i wonder if it is possible to "package" objects into package definition as follow:
CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE OBJECTS_TEST IS
TYPE MYTYPE IS OBJECT(T0 VARCHAR2(200),T1 VARCHAR2(200));
when i try to execute this I always receive the following error:
ERROR line 3, col 22, ending_line 3, ending_col 22, Found '(', Expecting: ;
So far, seems that the definition of the object must go internally to the PACKAGE BODY, therefore into a FUNCTION/PROCEDURE.
I would like to define a package that works as a global handler for all my objects used in my schema, what I'm supposed to do ?
Any help will be very appreciated,
Thank you,
Luigi

Thank you everybody for your support, and as requested I'll try to be more precise.
I'm developing functions and procedure to manipulate data that will then be used by a Business Object universe.
As for now, I've opted to develop some custom transformation procedure in PL/SQL to handle special cases where strings contains value pairs like :
1~FirstText~2~SecondText
From this point onward, I need to create a view that needs to be like this:
VALUE | TEXT
1 | FirstText
2 | SecondText
So far, I've build a PL/SQL procedure that parse the string and returns a TABLE OF OBJECTS to be further used in a VIEW with more or less 100 records.
Those objects where initially declared externally to my package in this way:
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE RadioQuestionParam IS OBJECT (
                                            Q_ID     VARCHAR2 (50 CHAR),
                                            Q_F_ID VARCHAR2 (50 CHAR),
                                            Q_VALUE VARCHAR2 (4000 CHAR),
                                            Q_TEXT VARCHAR2 (4000 CHAR)
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE RadioQuestionParamTable IS TABLE OF RadioQuestionParam;
/and the procedure that will use them is...
create or replace package objects_test
FUNCTION PARAMS2ROWS2     (P_Q_ID      IN VARCHAR2,
                             P_Q_F_ID    IN VARCHAR2,
                            P_Q_PARAM   IN VARCHAR2)
                            RETURN RadioQuestionParamTable ;
end objects_test;
/so then I can use:
select * from table(objects_test.params2rows2('q_id','q_f_id','1~TEST1~2~TEST2'));to produce the desired output.
As I would like to organize everything in one single package I was wondering if there's a way of using OBJECTS INSIDE A PACKAGE....
As for now I've modified my code to use michaels2 suggestion but with no luck as when I execute the
select * from table(objects_test.params2rows2('q_id','q_f_id','1~TEST1~2~TEST2')); I'm receiving a ORA-00902: invalid datatype;
Thank you for your precious help,
Luigi

Accessing fields of a custom object type

Hello,
this is for Oracle 11.2.0.4.0
I am trying to create and return an object inside a function and then access attributes of that object.
It works in that I get the expexted result in my query, but the object is created once again for each attribute that I am accessing:
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE zzz_tp_type_test AS OBJECT (
col_a VARCHAR2(100 CHAR),
col_b VARCHAR2(100 CHAR),
col_c VARCHAR2(100 CHAR)
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION zzz_f_type_test RETURN zzz_tp_type_test
IS
ret zzz_tp_type_test := zzz_tp_type_test('aa', 'bb', 'cc');
BEGIN
dbms_output.put_line('Running once...');
RETURN ret;
END;
SET serveroutput ON;
SELECT (A).col_a, (A).col_b, (A).col_c FROM (
    SELECT zzz_f_type_test A FROM dual
The result of the SELECT query is
(A).COL_A
(A).COL_B
(A).COL_C
aa
bb
cc
Running once...
Running once...
Running once...
I am not sure why this is happening, or how to prevent this. I would expect to call the function only once, and then access that one created instance for each attribute.
I am thinking it might have to do with the parentheses around "A", but that was the only way to get the query to execute - without them I got a syntax error.
What do I need to change for the DB to execute the function only once?
Thank you...

That's a good solution using a table type and table function. It can be simplified a bit, as shown below.
SCOTT@orcl> -- test environment:
SCOTT@orcl> select banner from v$version
2 /
BANNER
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - 64bit Production
PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
CORE    11.2.0.1.0    Production
TNS for 64-bit Windows: Version 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
5 rows selected.
SCOTT@orcl> -- original type and function:
SCOTT@orcl> CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE zzz_tp_type_test AS OBJECT (
2        col_a VARCHAR2(100 CHAR),
3        col_b VARCHAR2(100 CHAR),
4        col_c VARCHAR2(100 CHAR)
5      );
6 /
Type created.
SCOTT@orcl> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION zzz_f_type_test
2    RETURN zzz_tp_type_test
3 IS
4    ret zzz_tp_type_test := zzz_tp_type_test('aa', 'bb', 'cc');
5 BEGIN
6    dbms_output.put_line('Running once...');
7    RETURN ret;
8 END;
9 /
Function created.
SCOTT@orcl> SET SERVEROUTPUT ON
SCOTT@orcl> -- additional type from Gerard:
SCOTT@orcl> create or replace type zzz_nt_type_test is table of zzz_tp_type_test;
2 /
Type created.
SCOTT@orcl> -- simplification of Gerard's query:
SCOTT@orcl> select i.col_a, i.col_b, i.col_c
2 from table (zzz_nt_type_test (zzz_f_type_test())) i
3 /
COL_A
COL_B
COL_C
aa
bb
cc
1 row selected.
Running once...
SCOTT@orcl> exec dbms_output.put_line('end');
end
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SCOTT@orcl>

Simple Question - Data Transfer Object

Hey gurus,
I like the option in JBuilder to automatically create Data Transfer Objects and an Assembler for it. But what? I used to make the assembler a Session Bean, and JBuilder makes it a normal Java class with static methods. I know JBuilder always ships with the best solutions, but...
what is the advantage of the static class here? And in my case, i have the session beans and the entity beans deployed on a different server, would that make a difference for the advantage?
greets,
Nick.

Hey gurus,
I like the option in JBuilder to automatically create
Data Transfer Objects and an Assembler for it. But
what? I used to make the assembler a Session Bean,
and JBuilder makes it a normal Java class with static
methods. I know JBuilder always ships with the best
solutions, but...
well....... not always
:-)

Issue with RCDC for Custom "Department" object type

Hey Guys,
Maybe somebody can point out where the issue is with the RCDC. I have a custom object type called Department in FIM portal and wanted to create a simple interface for it so users can add and edit department fields.
The only two fields that should show on the RCDC is department and divisions(this is the name of the custom field) all the fields work but I keep getting the following error "There's an error in the Department display configuration.Please contact your
system administrator"
Below is the RCDC:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

<my:ObjectControlConfiguration xmlns:xd="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/infopath/2003" xmlns:my="http://schemas.microsoft.com/2006/11/ResourceManagement" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<my:ObjectDataSource my:Name="object" my:TypeName="PrimaryResourceObjectDataSource"/>
<my:ObjectDataSource my:Name="delta" my:TypeName="PrimaryResourceDeltaDataSource"/>
<my:ObjectDataSource my:Name="rights" my:TypeName="PrimaryResourceRightsDataSource"/>
<my:ObjectDataSource my:Name="schema" my:TypeName="SchemaDataSource"/>
<my:XmlDataSource my:Name="summaryTransformXsl" <my:Parameters="Microsoft.IdentityManagement.WebUI.Controls.Resources.DefaultSummary.xsl"/>
<my:Panel my:Name="page" my:Caption="Default Configuration" my:AutoValidate="true">
<my:Grouping my:Name="_caption" my:Caption="Caption" my:IsHeader="true">
<my:Control my:Name="_caption" my:TypeName="UocCaptionControl" my:Caption="Create Department" my:Description="" my:ExpandArea="true">
<my:Properties>
<my:Property my:Name="MaxHeight" my:Value="32"/>
<my:Property my:Name="MaxWidth" my:Value="32"/>
</my:Properties>
</my:Control>
</my:Grouping>
<my:Grouping my:Name="DepartmentInformation" my:Caption="Department Information">
<my:Control my:Name="Department" my:TypeName="UocLabel" my:Caption="{Binding Source=schema, Path=Department.DisplayName}" my:Description="" my:RightsLevel="{Binding Source=rights, Path=Department}">
<my:Properties>
<my:Property my:Name="Required" my:Value="True"/>
<my:Property my:Name="Text" my:Value="{Binding Source=object, Path=Department, Mode=TwoWay}"/>
</my:Properties>
</my:Control>
<my:Control my:Name="Divisions" my:TypeName="UocDropDownList" my:Caption="{Binding Source=schema, Path=Divisions.DisplayName}" my:Description="{Binding Source=schema, Path=Divisions.Description}">
<my:Options>
<my:Option my:Value="" my:Caption="" my:Hint="Please Select a Division"/>
<my:Option my:Value="Division of Academic Affairs" my:Caption="Division of Academic Affairs"/>
<my:Option my:Value="Division of Administration" my:Caption="Division of Administration"/>
<my:Option my:Value="Division of Adult & Continuing Education" my:Caption="Division of Adult & Continuing Education"/>
<my:Option my:Value="Division of Information Technology" my:Caption="Division of Information Technology"/>
<my:Option my:Value="Division of Institutional Advancement" my:Caption="Division of Institutional Advancement"/>
<my:Option my:Value="Division of President's Office" my:Caption="Division of President's Office"/>
<my:Option my:Value="Division of Student Affairs" my:Caption="Division of Student Affairs"/>
</my:Options>
<my:Properties>
<my:Property my:Name="Required" my:Value="{Binding Source=schema, Path=Divisions.Required}"/>
<my:Property my:Name="ValuePath" my:Value="Value"/>
<my:Property my:Name="CaptionPath" my:Value="Caption"/>
<my:Property my:Name="HintPath" my:Value="Hint"/>
<my:Property my:Name="ItemSource" my:Value="Custom"/>
<my:Property my:Name="SelectedValue" my:Value="{Binding Source=object, Path=Divisions, Mode=TwoWay}"/>
</my:Properties>
</my:Control>
</my:Grouping>
<my:Grouping my:Name="summary" my:Caption="Summary" my:IsSummary="true">
<my:Control my:Name="summaryControl" my:TypeName="UocHtmlSummary" my:ExpandArea="true">
<my:Properties>
<my:Property my:Name="ModificationsXml" my:Value="{Binding Source=delta, Path=DeltaXml}"/>
<my:Property my:Name="TransformXsl" my:Value="{Binding Source=summaryTransformXsl, Path=/}"/>
<my:Property my:Name="Hint" my:Value="{Binding Source=schema, Path=%AttributeName%.Hint}"/>
</my:Properties>
</my:Control>
</my:Grouping>
</my:Panel>
</my:ObjectControlConfiguration>
Any advice is appreciated.

I don't know RCDCs well enough to debug it from the xml. One approach when I don't know something too well is to brute it. Copy one of the default RCDCs and make sure it's working then add the required attributes one by one checking that it works each
time. Once it's working with the added attributes remove all the ones you don't need. If that breaks it, go back to where it was working and remove them one by one.

Question for making Report of Custom Object(01)

We use Custom Object 01 for Comment under the Calendar(Activity) Screen.
- Objective :
1. We want to manage Comment that are made by Manager after closing Sales Activity
2. But, we can't manage Comment history in Calendar(Activity) Details because it is remained Last Comment in Details
3. So, we use Custom Object 01 for Comment
- Problem & Question :
1. We can manage Comment history under Calendar(Activity) Screen
2. But, we can't make Report Comment Report related with Account, Contact
3. So, we want to know
a. Are there no relationship Custom Object 01(Comment) with Account, Contact in Calendar(Activity) Screen
b. If we have to make Comment Report related with Account, Contact, how to make it?
Please let me know about that issue.... Thank You!!!

Your question is not clear. Do you want CO 1 to be related to Account, Contact and Activity? Or not? And what exactly is the reporting question?
Custom Object 1 is available for Real-Time reports. The Custom Object 1 subject area allows you to report on CO along with the related Accounts, Activities, Contacts, Leads, Opportunities, and Service Requests.

Using Multiple Object Types in a FIM Managed Criteria Distribution Group

Is it possible to use multiple object types in a criteria based distribution group. So when building your criteria filter, "Select (object type) that match (all/any) of the following condiftions". Currently you can only choose 1 object type and
I want to be able to choose object type "user" and a custom object type I create for my contacts

You can create main condition as "any" and later add two sub-conditions - one that object in set "All People" and other sub-condition that object in set "All Contacts" or "All Groups".
If you found my post helpful, please give it a Helpful vote. If it answered your question, remember to mark it as an Answer.

Simple Question- WS & Custom object types

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for