Since inception figs for actual cost

Hi all, Please suggest something.
I have one scenario in which i want to calculate inception figs ex. i have one project which starts from say 2000. I want to know what is the actual till the date.
As of now for the period i am getting by using cal year month.
But how to calculate total actual till the date.
amit

i m closing this as no ans.

Similar Messages

Report painter/writer for actual cost component split

Hello Gurus,
Any of you guys ever explored possibility of creating a report using report painter or writer that can give both Standard and Actual cost component splits in one report? Is it even possible without custom ABAP involvement?
Thanks
RG

Hi Raghu,
After your reply, I am getting a doubt..
Have you Activated Material Ledger? When you say Actual Cost Component Split, are you talking about it what you get in Actual Costing/Material Ledger?
If yes, then you can map your cost compnents for Actual Costing in the path SPROControllingProfitability AnalysisMaster Data Valuation--Setup Valuation using Material Cost Estimate -- Define Access to Actual Costing / Material Ledger
Further, there are no standard reports available in COPA. Try to build a report comprising two columns, 1st column with the value fields which are mapped for Standard Cost Components and 2nd column with the Value Fields which you have assined for Actual Costing under the above path.
You will be able to get the comparison...
Pls don't hesitate to call me for further assistance....
Srikanth Munnaluri

Incorrect exchange rate for Actual cost documents

Dear all experts,
I have an actual cost documents which was created on 02.10.2006,it should be taking the value date for currency exchange as 01.09.2006,but it is taking 01.
04.2006 hence it resulting in picking wrong exchange rate.Any solution to solve it and what is the cause of this issue? Thank You

hie, the currency is set in the table TCURR. the time rederence ? sorry,I am very new to this.the user just told me to that the currency for actual cost taken wrongly,all i managed to check is tat the value date for currency translation for tat particular actual cost document is 01.04.2006,tat's y it took the wrong exchange rate. And i guess the exchange rate is already updated in BW.

Permit not assigned for Actual cost

Hi Dears,
Permit not assigned for actual cost in maint order
Actual cost in maintenance order is 3000
In IPMD, cost1 is assigned with class ACTUAL COST and value 3000 is defined.
In OIPG, Permit class ACTUALCOST is assigned.
Goods issue done to order for value 3000.
Again cost determination executed, but still cost1 is not assinged to the work order.
Am i missing anything ?
Regards,
Alagesan M

Hi
In charac CT04 i maintained one value 3000 and table maintained CSEVPERMIT and IKOSTEN
In class CL01, assigned the charac for 049 class type
In OIPG, permit class is maintained with class
In IPMD, new permit created and assigned class in classification and maintained 3000
Now order created and component assigned the planned value is 3000.
through MIGO goods issue done and found the actual value is 3000.
But still opened the permit found nothing assigned.
For Estimated cost and planned costs it is working good only for actual cost permit is not assigning.
Actual cost we need to anything more other than this ?
Alagesan

FM for Actual cost line items for orders.

HI EXPERTS,
I was working on Actual cost line items for orders / Internal orders of an employee.
standard program RKAEP000 is present through TCODE KOB1.
I want some customization of report, so debugged the program and found that its using a FM 'K_LINE_ITEMS_SELECT_AND_LIST' to calculate internal orders.
But the FM has used REUSE_ALV_* and displaying output itself.
the requirement is to customize the output display .
I searched with K_LINE_* and found some other function modules too.
K_LINE_ITEM_CHECK
K_LINE_ITEM_APC_SIGN_GET
K_LINE_ITEM_GET_CONTEXT_MENU
K_LINE_ITEM_GET_TOOLBAR
K_LINE_ITEM_LOGICAL_KEY_GET
K_LINE_ITEM_TECH_SETTINGS_SET
K_LINE_ITEM_VALUE_TYPES_GET
K_LINE_ITEM_VALUE_TYPES_SET
K_LINE_ITEMS_ACT_GRID
K_LINE_ITEMS_SELECT
K_LINE_ITEMS_SELECT_AND_LIST
K_LINE_ITEM_ACT_CALL_WITH_DATA
K_LINE_ITEM_ACT_DATA_GET
K_LINE_ITEM_CM_CALL_WITH_DATA
K_LINE_ITEM_DEV_CALL_WITH_DATA
K_LINE_ITEM_PLN_CALL_WITH_DATA
K_LINE_ITEM_PROCESS_UCOMM_ACT
K_LINE_ITEM_STEERING_GET
Can anybody tell which FM should i use so that result i will get in an internal table?
or suggest any other methods
Thanks in Advance.
Lucky

I also had the same requirement and used function module K_LINE_ITEM_ACT_DATA_GET
this function is calling K_LINE_ITEMS_SELECT_AND_LIST function with I_NO_DISPLAY parameter
and returning the result.
Already they are in same function group,
I wrote this for future requirements of people after 4 years of this thread

Report for actual cost of WBS, Profit center wise

Hi Experts,
Do we have any standard report that gives the actual cost of WBS/Project with Profit center wise.
Thanks,
Krishna

Hi,
Thanks for your solutions.
But I m looking for the Profit center in the report (display screen), not in selection screen.
My scenario is like, the cost was posted to WBSE with X profit center/cost center in January, now I changed the profit center to Y for the same WBSE and posted.
Want to see thru which PC I have posted to WBSE and how much. So that I can reversal.
Thanks again.
Krishna.
Edited by: krishna.gujju on Jul 8, 2011 6:56 PM

Reason for Actual Cost Error in Production Order

Hi,
I have Convert the planned order to Production order but error message coming "Actual Cost Error".
what procedure that error avoid.
plz, Advise me.
By,
Jeevan.S

Hi
1.problem could be with the activity type costing.
check KP26 data maintained or not (for activity and costcentre assigned to work cneter)
2.IF order having CSER status then do the cost caliculation in the order, so that the status will go.(do thsi after correcting the KP26 data)
if still facing check the error
-ashok

COPA Costing key for actual cost component split

Hi,
I would like to allow the users to specify different period/year in the following screen every month when they do the COPA revaluation. However i noticed this screen is part of customization and cannot be changed by the users without a transport. As such how can we allow the users to change the period/year by themselves every month?

Hi Sanjay Ram,
Whatever the marked one i.e. period/year is used especially when you want to consider the PUP or actual cost the material for that specific period only. As you know it can not be changed in every period.
So, for that purpose only we have the above one i.e. period a/c to line item, by this system is going to pick the PUP or actual cost of the specific period for which the line item has taken place (the line item that may be billing or settlement)
Regards..
Jose

MR21 price change for actual cost of inventory

Hi
Material ledger is not active. We have four FERT materials and four production orders in April 2011. Material inventory is on standard price. We want closing inventory at actual value. I have tried to change the price via MR21 but system is not allowing me to change price because cost estimate is exist.
Actual production order cost divided by actual production = actual cost per unit.
I want to use this price in MR21 to re-valuate the inventory in current month.
hope clear.
regards

Hi Imdad
Here is a workaround which I used many times
a. Create a New Costing variant, with Costing Type = Release to Prices other than Std Cost
b. The Valuation Variant settings must be as below
For Materials - Strategy J (Price as per Price Control as of Last Period)
For Activity prices - Actual Price of Previous Period
c. At month end, once you calculate Actual Activity price, you can create a Costing Run in Ck40N
The Costing date can be 01.Apr.2011, if you are running the Cost Estimate for March 2011
d. The price calculated to be stored in Plan price 2 field of the Material Master or Tax price field
You can get a comparison of original Std cost and the revised std cost.... If need be, you can pass a JV in FI for the Stock (x) Revised price - Original Std price
5. If need be, you can also revaluate the COGS in COPA using this std cost estimate

Need a report for actual cost by WBS element by month

Hello all,
I am looking for a report that will give me the total costs charged to a series of of WBS elements by month. Does anybody know if such a report can be run and what the transaction number of this report would be?
Thanks

Hello Stacy,
Thank you for your help.
I tried the S_ALR_87100185 report as you instructed but I cant get it to display as I would like to see it. What I need the report to do is display actuals by month and WBS elemnts from January through August. However the report cuts off at the May period. Does anybody have a workaround so I can see the charges from January through August?
Thanks

Tabale for Actual cost value for Process orders

Hi Friends
From which table can we retrive the actual values relates to process orderwise, like actual material consumption cost, activites cost, overhead cost and other costs.

Hi
You would find the actual for process orders in Table COEP with Object Number = OP*. Also Check if you would require COSS, COSP for Controlling Tables and to get the Object numbers you need to used AFPO with Order type of Process order PI01...
Regards,
Suraj

Actual costs for laboratory exams / Material Ledger

Hi Experts
I have a doubt for actual cost scenario for laboratory industry.
My background is for product cost for consumer goods, specially food companies, so this is a new segment for me.
This laboratory has baseline version, no service/production order, it means all material consumption goes to cost center and they use activities to send costs from cost center to cost center.
They have BOM for all exams (finished product). They only run CK40N for standard costs but they don't have actual cost (material ledger - CKMLCP) implemented.
This is the issue: they want actual cost for every exam in the way we have for consumer goods industry.
So they can analyse profitability for product (exam) x customers.
I wounder if the same industry actual cost scenario can be applied to this business segment or if there is a special SAP solution for this segment.
The main issue is the stock, there is no stock, it´s service. I believe we could change the account in BSX key (OBYC) for some P&L accounts but I´d like your opinion/experience.
I hope you help me to clarify these doubts
Thanks in advance.

Dear Rupesh,
I don't think so there will be any std.report in PS module to show plan vs actual cost of material component.
For looking plan vs actual cost in PS having many std reports but they don't show for material component.
I think for this you need to develop a Z report which will show Plan vs Actual cost of material component.
In CN52N report (Component overview report) you can add two fields one is for plan cost & other for actual cost.This can be one of possibilty you can try.Otherwise develop a new Z report for the same.
For this you need to take yr abaper's help.
Regard's
Sandeep

Actual Cost Component Split for cross company code transfers.

Hi,
My issue is as follows.
Production process spans across 2 company codes.
Goods are produced in production company code, transferred (via stock transport order) to marketing company code and sold to customers from marketing company code.
Stock transport order follows sales scenario i.e.. marketing company code creates purchase order for goods from production company code and production company code bills marketing for the goods.
Actual costing / Material ledger is implemented in both company codes.
We would like to roll-up (transfer) actual cost component split from production company code to marketing company (in a similar way as in product cost planning in cross-company scenario).
However, due to the fact that the transfer between the companies is in fact a "sales" the goods in marketing company code are seen as externally purchased and the only cost component we can create is based on PO conditions. But we want to get the info about production cost component split.
Once again this is for ACTUAL cost component split.
I would be grateful for any ideas.
Thanks,
Szymon

Hi Udo / Szymon.
I have a question about this issue.
In the sap help about multiple valuations / group costing:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/7e/cb848443a311d189ee0000e81ddfac/content.htm
Its not clear if this can roll up the Actual CCS? or what it do? My question is because i read the documentation of bussiness function: LOG_MM_SIT,and also the book *Actual Costing with The SAP Material Ledger*
states that we can handle the rollup of actual cost component split inter-company only with this BF active.
Could you clarify about this?
thanks!!
Arturo.
Group Valuation
Goods movements between affiliated companies not involving intercompany profits are processed using the group view. This view determines the actual cost of goods manufactured for the group, and does not include any intercompany profits. You can, however, display internal profits as delta profits in the legal and/or profit center views.
When you define cost components, you can specify that internal profits between company codes and/or profit centers are shown in detail in the cost component split. You activate these delta profits for the group valuation in the attributes of the cost components.
For each cost component structure, there can only be one cost component under which the delta profit is shown. This means that neither the legal view nor the profit center view can have more than one cost component for the delta profit.
To cost multiple values, you define a costing type for each valuation approach in Customizing for Product Cost Planning. You use the costing type to specify which valuation approach you require. You define each costing type in a new costing variant and carry out a cost estimate with this costing variant.
Group Costing and Multiple Valuation Approaches
In-Depth Detail of the Value-Added Chain: Partner Cost Component Split
You can display in detail the costs of materials and services of every company department in the value-added chain for every stage of the production process. The partner can be traced for every material used. To do this, you define a partner version, which enables the value-added portions of each manufacturing level to be displayed in detail. For further information about this, see Partners and Direct Partners.
The group cost component split can be displayed according to your partner definition. You can display the cost structures of the partners hierarchically according to your requirements, such as the company code segments on the highest level and the plant or profit center segments underneath.
To display partner cost component splits, define a partner version in Customizing and enter it in the costing type.

Posting Actual Costs at Material Level

Hi All
For our standard costs we will have BOM Components, Activities from Routings and additive costs. We also have activated Material Ledger and will use it for Actual Costing, the objective being that each and every actual cost will be brought to the SKU level. For BOM components and activities that is no problem since it will be done through settlement.
However for cost components that have additive costs how do we settle them to the material ledger? Do we need to do MR22 for difference between standard and actual? Is there a way to do this through a template allocation or some other allocation method?
Thank you

Hi
Lets assume, you have Std cost of 100 USD involving Material + Labor and an additive cost of 10 USD entered manually from CK74N...
During production order processing - You would issue material components and confirm Labor hrs... Say, this amounts to 120 USD as against the std cost of 100 USD...
However, in prod orders, there will be nothing posted against the additive std cost of 10 USD... If you wish, you need to post it either through template allocation from some cost centers or use some assessment cycle or transfer manually from KB11N or use a costing sheet
Regards
Ajay M

Raw Material Costing with Actual Cost Component Split

Hi All
I have requirement to split inventory RM Value with material component and Freight cost, all config done and looks well if I check at CKM3N cost component view, material cost $100 and Freight $20, I GR the inventory with freight cost, since I'm using actual costing when journal freight cost go to Price Difference account. But after actual costing closing why the system can't split the variance update to freight cost component? is this the standard SAP behaviour?
Please help for the solution
Regards
Luiz

I see that you want to split your material cost and freight cost. you need to check the following:
Is your current standard cost estimate support this structure i.e do you have seperate cost components for RM and Freight.
If not first you need to change cost component structure and as mentioned by owen you to map the purchase condition type to the origin group and cost component structure.
Then system will do the same for the actual costing

Since inception figs for actual cost

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for