Sincronizzazione foto .nef da libreria aperture

Da alcuni giorni ho un problema con la sincronizzazione dei progetti di aperture con itunes nel mio ipad.
Non mi riconosce e non mi sincronizza i file nef scattati con la mia d7000 mentre se importo le stesse foto su iphoto non ci sono problemi..come posso fare

Alan Ford wrote:
Quando inizia l'importazione vedo la foto brillante poi subito dopo i colori si spengono.
Le stesse foto importate e aperte con Capture mi danno colori brillanti.
Una volta trasformato il Nef in Tiff o Jpeg con CaptureNx li riapro con Aperture e ritrovo le mie foto brillanti.
Cosa succede nella fase di importazione??
May I guess that you have a D300? The settings you make in the Shooting Menu > Set Picture Control, (Menu di ripresa > Imposta controllo immagine) are stored in a way that Aperture does not read. Capture NX does so, however, and they are saved to Tiff and Jpegs from Capture NX.

Similar Messages

  • Hello, failing miserably here,  cant import nef files from aperture 3.1.2 to iphone 4.  I am syncing with the projects and smart albums and I am only able to sync the jogs and psd's   Anyone out there to aid this frustrated photographer??

    hello, failing miserably here,  cant import nef files from aperture 3.1.2 to iphone 4.  I am syncing with the projects and smart albums and I am only able to sync the jogs and psd's   Anyone out there to aid this frustrated photographer??

    See my reply to a later simplified version of your question. I don't think that either iPhone or iPad recognize RAW files such as NEFs. And the iPhone is not designed to be a mass storage device like a portable flash or portabel hard drive for temporary storage of files, if that's what you're after.  As I mentioned in my previous reply, I have an iPad and have been experimenting with it as a tool for photography, hoping that it would be a nice travel tool for backing up and viewing photos from my Nikon dslr. But both the iPad and iPhone just are not set up to do that well. Both show photos nicely, but organization of photos is very frustrating since you can't create albums on the iPhone or iPad, but only back on your sync computer. (There is one very powerful photo organization app called SortShots, but you import photos to it and it organizes and stores the images wtihin the app not using the native photo app. It doesn't work with NEFs either.) I don't know of any RAW processing software for either device.

  • Time to export/save one D2X NEF to JPG Aperture vs. Bridge/ACR

    15" PB, 1.5 Ghz, 1.5 GB RAM, running Firefox, Entourage, while each app is running test.
    Single D2X NEF in an Aperture project:
    -No sharpening applied, export to JPG 11 seconds
    -Any sharpening applied, export to JPG 29 seconds
    Single D2X in a folder in Bridge, open in ACR
    under Bridge:
    -Any sharpening or not, save to JPG 15 Seconds
    Note, while Aperture exports, the entire app is tied up. Bridge does the saving in the background, which allows you to continue working in Bridge/CS2

    I have not run that test, but I did do Aperture batch versus CS(1) batch...
    Basically, when I'm batching from CS RAW -> JPEG, my dual G5 turns 12 images per minute. When I "export" from Aperture (which might as well be a "batch," it's doing the same function), I get a little over 13 images per minute.
    Frankly, I almost never sharpen when coming from RAW. I prefer to make a highly selective sharpening pass later after going to JPEG, sharpening only those that need it the most. I'm not a big believer in sharpening, due to fact that I have no control over how image will be resized, and sharpening prior to a significant resizing is pointless in my experience... and despite all the talk about how digital images are soft compared to film (due to the built-in sensor filter) I don't really buy that. I don't remember film being so dang sharp.... with the L series glass I'm using and 8.2 megapixels, this stuff looks as freakin' sharp as 35mm film ever did to me... now I will concede that medium format film has a certain sharpness advantage, but 35mm??? Maybe Kodachrome on a tripod, but probably not an ISO 400 print film hand held at a wedding reception... I digress.
    Now I'm going to go run your sharpness test to see what I can see, seeing as how I finally upgraded to CS2 this week.

  • Nikon NEF files and Aperture 2

    Can anyone advise how to allow adjustments to NEF files in Aperture 2?
    I just bought a Nikon D700 after using a Canon w/out problems for years.
    I imported to iPhoto and then to Aperture. All the files appear in view but adjustments are ghosted out and it says are "not enabled".
    I have NX2 but find it clunky and would prefer to use Aperture.
    I'm appealing for help after spending nearly all weekend trying to get it to work.
    Very grateful for any advice!

    I would guard against upgrading to Ap 3, particularly if you are running 10.6.4, unless you are willing to face head on the issues raised in this thread http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2470180&tstart=15&start=0.
    HTH,
    Roy

  • RAW NEF files in Aperture from Nikon Capture editing show no edits

    Any NEF files that I have previously edited and re-saved in Nikon Capture Editor as a NEF file, do not display any of the changes when imported into Aperture. I only see the 'As Shot' version.
    Interesting that the Finder in OS X shows the thumbnail correctly. Has anyone else seen this issue?
    Thanks, Scott K.

    According to Scott Kelby, in an ancient treatise from when he was currying favor with Nikon, that's how NEFs work, and that's the beauty of most proprietary raw handlers. Capture's adjustments are merely instructions, saved along with the file, rather like adjustment layers. When you open the NEF in Nikon Capture, the instructions are added to the image. You can always cancel them and recover the original since nothing has actually been done to the original. Your preview thumbnail out of Capture is designed to exhibit the changes but I'm not surprised Aperture doesn't read the changes made in Capture.
    If you saved out of Capture as a TIFF, aperture would see them.
    bogiesan

  • Opening NEF files from Aperture into Camera Raw?

    Does Aperture allow opening of images directly from a project / album into Adobe Camera Raw?
    Seems like it should yet I've not been successful in finding out how to do this.
    Thanks for any help offered.

    DiploStrat wrote:
    I would argue that point with you. If you want to say that Photoshop, Elements, or Lightroom have more powerful editing tools, then you may well be right. But ACR is merely the front end to these programs and while I may be misaken on this, does not exist as a stand alone program.
    I'm not going to pretend that I know everything there is to know about all of these different programs. The only thing I can tell you is that Camera Raw (not a standalone but part of PShop CS) provides not only powerful tools for correcting exposure, tone, HSL, sharpening, noise and all the other features that photographers love, but it can correct the visual and chromatic aberrations based on the camera lens profile metadata embedded in the photo. In short, with one click I can correct the distortions in the image that are unique to the lens used to take the image. It also has a camera calibration feature that can be set to the same as it is set in my Nikon.
    I love Adobe Camera Raw. It is very good at what it does and is not trying to be more than what it is. I'm very happy with it and have no impetus to try another editing software.
    Cataloguing photos is not what CR does, however, and for this, I have been using Aperture which seems to be trying to be much more than simply a cataloguing program.
    As mentioned, I used to use something called iViewMedia Pro which was terrific but was bought out by Microsoft and turned into something called Expression Media. That worked until they decided to evolve away from merely being a cataloguing software. Looked into Extensis Portfolio but they want an insane amount of money for their product. Aperture seemed like it had the cataloguing features I need and so far, I don't have many complaints about it ... except one notable one: When I need to open a NEF file for editing, it opens directly into Photoshop rather than in CR.
    What I'm hearing from these discussions is that there is some kind of conversion incompatibility which is a shame, but answers the question. I can only hope that Apple and Adobe will improve their products so that they are more compatible with one another.
    I will, however, not hold my breath.

  • Anyone getting acceptable D700 NEF conversions with Aperture?

    I got home from photographing an afternoon wedding today and nearly ****** myself when I pulled up the files in Aperture: most of the pictures taken outside appeared overexposed by a stop or two, looked horribly desaturated, and suffered from serious white balance problems. "Highlight hot zones" lit up half the image in red. I had been keeping my blinkies under control during the shoot, and the images looked fine when I spot checked them during the day, so I suspected that Aperture was doing something wonky. I exported several of the masters and opened them up in Raw Photo Processor, my benchmark raw converter. Sure enough, they looked fine. Aperture is screwing up the raw conversion.
    It was particularly interesting how the embedded JPEG that initially popped up looks fine, and then Aperture's subsequent raw conversion looked terrible.
    I'm running up-to-date everything: 10.5.5, latest camera raw update, etc.
    Is anyone getting acceptable D700 NEF conversions? If so, what are you doing differently?
    Thanks,
    Andreas

    Andreas,
    If Preview is showing the same behaviour, then it's not Aperture itself but rather the Camera Raw 2.2.
    To clarify the "similar output" statement I made with respect to the RAW conversions:
    ViewNX - straight off it looked like what I wanted with minimal tweaking, as it read the NEF file secret sauce instructions such as tweaked saturation. Was not as good at fixing highlights and shadows though in the case of problematic shots but produced excellent detail
    ACR - produced good middle-of-the-road that by comparison to ViewNX was a little under-saturated or lacked "pop" (but I couldn't finger any particular aspect). By cranking up the saturation and laying with white point, black point etc could arrive at a similar appearance outcome to ViewNX.
    Aperture - seemed to produce a shot more like ViewNX and allowed big latitude in adjustments, especially pulling detail out of shadows without blowing out the photo. Auto exposure was surprisingly useful. Level of detail perhaps not quite as good as ViewNX, but had to be looking at 400% blowup onscreen to pick it, and even then the diff could have been put down to the level of default sharpening.
    I hadn't heard of RPP, but will give it a go.
    Meanwhile, you're stuck in no-man's land... Here's hoping Apple fixes the 2.2 bug in 2.3 and you can finally do the RAW processing!
    Regards,
    Calx

  • Niko nef support in aperture

    Count me as another new D300s owner who can't get either Aperture or i Photo to recognize nef files from the D300s. I did get the raw files to work when I formatted the CF card for the D200 and installed it in the D300s. Hope the problem gets solved soon. Don't think of this work around as a solution.

    CS5 will never open your files natively. They require ACR 7.2 at least, which means CS6 and beyond. You can only use the free DNG converter "flavor" of ACR.
    Mylenium

  • RAW NEF files imported into Aperture from a Nikon D70 are dark

    I imported one roll of images straight from the CF card from my Nikon D70 into Aperture.
    I also imported them into Nikon PictureProject. (the current application I use)
    All the NEF's in Aperture are darker than the NEF's in PictureProject. Has anyone else seen this issue?
    Also, any NEF that I have previously edited and saved in Nikon Capture Editor, do not display any of the changes when imported into Aperture. Interesting that the Finder shows the thumbnail correctly. Has anyone else seen this issue?
    Thanks, Scott K.

    I've imported a few of the NEF files I've gotten from my D2X, and for the most part, they look fine. A little darker than when displayed in Adobe Bridge and ACR, but not that much darker. This is probably just the way the image converter is interpreting the RAW data. A couple of minor levels adjustments for me, and they look fine.
    As for Aperture not "seeing" the changes made to a RAW file in Nikon Capture. That may be due to the way Capture applies its changes to the file. If when you make a change, Capture simply adds the adjustments to a side car file, etc., and doesn't change the original RAW file (which it should never do), then Aperture is only reading the original RAW data. The side car info is not understood by Aperture. At least not now.
    This is pretty much the same way ACR works.
    Jeff Weinberg

  • Has anyone had trouble manipulating Nikon D750 raw image (NEF) in Aperture version 3.6 on Yosemite?

    Has anyone had trouble manipulating Nikon D750 raw image (NEF) in Aperture (version 3.6 500021000000000.3, Digital Camera RAW 6.0 - Build 761.5, Digital Camera RAW support 6000 - Build 136.1)
    I used to be able to manipuplate Nikon Raw (NEF) images from a Nikon D70 and D3200 using Aperture, until the 70 died and the 3200 was stolen about 18 months ago. Recently I did two things: (1) I upgraded OS X to Yosemite and (2) purchased a Nikon D750.  I have successfully imported NEF files from the camera to Aperture, but the images do not render/ cannot be opened/ manipulated. Instead, I see a black thumbnail for each imported image with a cassette recorder play icon in the center of each image. 
    I can view the NEF image in Finder preview mode, either directly when viewing the images on the camera SD card or after exporting the previously imported NEF image from Aperture to my desktop or user folder.  Previously imported NEF image seem unaffected.
    thanks.
    D.

    The current Apple OSX 10.10 Yosemite and the current Aperture version 3.6 do not have support yet for importing Nikon d750 nef/raw files. It usually takes Apple six to eight weeks to release a new digital camera raw update file for new Nikon dslr models. Once that digital camera raw update file is finally released, update your current version of Aperture and that will allow you to import your d750 raw files. In the meantime, you have many workarounds. In my opinion, the easiest is to save images in duplicate nef/raw and jpeg image files to your SD cards.
    And for now, just import the jpegs to Aperture 3.6 from your d750.  Process your jpegs in Aperture - and hope your clients are happy with the jpegs and can wait for later nef/raw image processing. Be sure to save and do not erase your original SD cards that include the nef/raw and jpeg files - then when Aperture finally releases a new digital camera raw file update that includes the d750 - just insert your original camera SD cards into the computer platform and import the old d750 nef/raw files and edit/process them.
    There are many other ways to proceed in the interim as well. You can always import your d750 nef/raw images into Lightroom (if it has been updated to convert the d750 nef files) and process them there. But for the time being, if you can afford to save and hold onto your original SD cards and wait for the inevitable Aperture digital camera raw update, this is a very easy and simple way to proceed.

  • LR5.7.1 no longer sees NEF files?

    Last week,  I upgraded LR to 5.7.1, since then LR will not, I repeat will not import NEF files!  It imported NEF files prior to that upgrade with no problems.  LR says the NEF files are "read only".  Which isn't true because I imported the same NEF files with Aperture onto a (Mac) laptop.  When I saved those NEF files as jpeg using Aperture,  then I was able to import them to LR.  I don't understand why LR is all of a sudden not able to import NEF files.

    On your greyed out photos, is there a ! or ? on the top right of any photo?  If so, right click on it and LR will ask if you want to find the missing photo, say yes and it will point to the folder that photo is in.  It wll also bring in other photos close by.
    Your Mac may be full, and it doesnt have room to 'work' so you can see the greyed photos in LR but not use them.  It happenned to me a couple years ago so I stored photos onto an external drive, which filled up and I recently had to get a larger one.  My recent issue arose when I upgraded to Yosemite and then LR 5.7.1.  The file sharing permissions were changed in the upgrade.
    To set permissions On your Mac, go to finder > file> get info.  The info window comes up and at the bottom is where you will find sharing/permissions. 
    Unlock the lock,  make changes, there is also a little wheel at the bottom left of the window underneath permissions, apply changes >lock the lock and close the window.
    When you get an external storage drive, do the same as aformentioned right after you install it.
    Then, On your Mac, Move your LR5 catalog to the new storage.
    Then open up LR and point LR to the storage location.  (The new storage device will show up on the left side of the LR window.)
    (Scott Kelby wrote in his LR3 manual that if you are taking pictures and storing them on your Mac, you will eventually need to move them to an external storage device especially if you take a lot of photos)

  • Using the Nikon RAW NEF format and Nikon Capture NX.

    This is about using the RAW NEF format in Aperture together with RAW NEF capable editing programs, specifically Nikon Capture NX.
    I basically agree with Aperture that it is a "workflow tool" and NOT a photo editor with all the bells and whistles of Photoshop or Nikon Capture. Apple fixed the most basic level of NEF conversion with version 1.1, great!
    However, as a workflow tool for RAW images, I cannot seem to figure out how to use RAW (Nikon's NEF) files efficiently with the new Nikon Capture NX.
    Nikon Capture NX is quite an interesting alternative to Photoshop. (I cannot wait or the Universal version, as with Photoshop, but that is another matter.) I like the work flow idea it uses, and I like that it edits the RAW NEF files directly, layering the edits on the RAW data. If I open an edited NEF file in Photoshop using the Nikon Plug-in, the result looks great. If I open the same file with Aperture (or using the Adobe RAW plugin) the result is basically an unedited version of the RAW NEF file. This is very disappointing.
    It seems I need to export the file from Nikon Capture as a TIFF or JPG. The TIFF gives good results but takes up about 10x more disc space. With the JPG I must give up the 16-bit per channel color depth. Neither allow me to have a "RAW workflow" as advertised by Aperture.
    What am I missing? Is this something Apple is going to work on by working more closely with Nikon (and Cannon)? (I figure Nikon keeps their conversion algorithms secret.)
    Or are we out of luck here?
    Macbook Pro 17" Mac OS X (10.4.7)
    Macbook Pro 17"   Mac OS X (10.4.7)  

    How do I know? Well if you change the white balance settings in-camera, different numbers come thru in Aperture. But the numbers in Aperture, ACR and the presumed numbers in-camera do not match. I wrote Nikon about this quite a while ago and they wrote back saying we do not know how other people interprete our proprietary WB numbers. See note below for additional insight as how you might look further into it
    "The shooting data I referenced is available in Nikon View Browser when viewing your images. Looking at all the images at once, it is easy to compare changes made to the camera by quickly clicking on the separate thumbnails. They displayed the differences I had mentioned before. If you do not already have the software, you can download it here:
    Title: Nikon View 6.2.7 Full Version - Windows
    URL: http://support.nikontech.com/cgi-bin/nikonusa.cfg/php/enduser/stdadp.php?p_faqid=13760&pcreated=1131989543
    Nikon Capture will not report a temperature value for White Balance, unless a manual Kelvin setting is selected using the option in the D200. As I mentioned before, Auto White Balance, and other Auto settings in the camera may not deliver a consistent result in a burst or as separate still frames even if the subject has not moved or changed. You have a cast on that one image using Auto White Balance. This is not uncommon, just choose a different value. The value may not even accurately reflect what situation you are in. It may be sunny, and you choose cloudy. The White Balance is not measuring the ambient light, it's used to measure the temperature of the light reflecting off your subject. The closer your subject is to white, the closer the value. This is why a preset is taken with a white or neutral gray card.
    Since Auto White Balance covers a wide range of temperature, the exact value is not recorded anywhere that I know of. In addition, all White Balance temperatures are approximate values, as per the manual page 35. Having a cast on an image while using Auto White Balance is very possible, just choose another value more suited to the ambient light.
    Set the White Balance to K , and capture an image, and this will be reported by the shooting data in Nikon Capture. I have no idea whether ACR is reporting an accurate value or not, we do not support that software, but check this value against what you see in there software."
    Regards,
    Steven

  • RAW files and exposure in Aperture

    I'm using a Nikon D90 and I shoot RAW/Fine JPG.  Using Aperture 3.4 and OS X 10.8.3, I import my photos into Aperture as RAW/JPG pairs with the RAW file as the master.  I know Aperture quickly imports the imbedded jpg to show the thumbnails and then processes the RAW the file to create a new thumbnail.  I've noticed in most cases, the original imported jpg before processing looks fine, but when the RAW is processed, the image turns considerablly darker so that each picture now needs a boost in exposure.  I try to get the exposure right in the camera, but even when the picture and histogram look fine in the camera, the RAW-processed file in Aperture is always darker.  Is there a way to avoid this and get RAW processed files closer to the jpg's I see in the camera and on the initial import?  Thanks

    I've just found a fix, or at least a temporary one until Apple sort Aperture out.
    When loading the RAW or NEF file in Aperture, wait for it to over expose the file. Then try this,
    1 - click the Adjustments tab on the left of the screen
    2 - click Effects
    3 - hover over Quick Fixes
    4 - select either Exposure -1 or Exposure -2
    -1 or -2 tends to fix my image depending on how much Aperture blew it out by when I loaded the image. Loading the image in full screen after doing that shows a very minor difference, only just detectable to the eye after a lot of pixel peeping, compared to the file loaded in Preview or iPhoto.
    So it seems for whatever reason Aperture is applying too much exposure by default to RAW / NEF files. Not sure how to change this or stop it but it could be a setting hidden somewhere. Obviously you could set up a routine to automatically apply either -1 or -2 to all RAW / NEF files on import if you wished or you can do it manually.
    This should help until Apple fix Aperture.
    I've also raised an issue with Apple about this to see if they can advise a proper fix.

  • Considering buying aperture.  Have raw images processed in NIK NX2 software.  What happens to those files when imported into Aperture?

    Understand NiK is discontinuing Capture NX2.  Therefore would like to buy Aperture as host for image management.  If I do purchase and import RAW files previously processed in NX2 into Aperture.  Is old processing retained?  Doubtful.  Or is new processing required?  Have an iMac with iPhoto 10 etc.

    Richard and Beverly wrote:
    If I do purchase and import RAW files previously processed in NX2 into Aperture.  Is old processing retained?
    You can import the image files converted from RAW and edited by NX2 but they will no longer be RAW NEF files they will be non-lossy TIFF files or lossy JPEG.
    Or you can import the original RAW NEF files into Aperture for Aperture to do the RAW conversion.
    To my eyes/brain with the Nikon cameras I use (D2x, D100, D5100) I find that NX2 provides the most pleasing RAW conversions, but I still use Aperture for its great workflow.
    HTH
    -Allen

  • Aperture 3 and geotagging

    I have Aperature 3 and an AMOD AGL3080 GPS data logger. I'm able to import the geotag information into Aperature 3 and it shows a map trail of where I've been.
    What I can't figure out is how to sync my pictures to that data in that the pictures I took while logging gps data I should be able to automatically sync? If I drag a picture over to the map it puts it's location where I drag it rather than where I really took it.
    Am I missing something in the process?

    process is as follows:
    - select the project you want to geotag
    - select "places" - the map should turn up
    - import the track (e.g. .gpx file)
    - you should than see the track in the places map
    - drag the first of your fotos onto the track
    - Aperture shows you the time gap between the point of time where you dragged the foto on the track and the the time in the exif data of your foto
    - move the photo on the track (dragging with your mouse) to left or right until you minimise time gap
    - now Aperture asks you if all other fotos of your project shall be assigned to this track - press the allocate places (not sure what the english Aperture version is named), don´t press "ready"
    - Aperture allocates now automatically all pictures to the track, but leaves the ones untagged that do not match
    Good luck!

Maybe you are looking for