Single System Landscape on Different Platforms

Hi All,
Is it possible to install one single system landscape on different platforms??
For instance, can I install Quality and Development systems on WIndows with Oracle Database and Production system on AIX with DB2 Database? All these systems belong to a single system landscape.
Is it possible? If it is possible, has someone done it and can i find the docs for that in service market place?
Thanks,
Vadivelan.N

Hi Nick,
We are planning to go with the two server landscape .
Our current scenario is ,
1. Solution manager on windows & Oracle.
2. DEV & QA on windos and oracle or AIX / DB2. and
3. Production on AIX & DB2.
We wanted to know what will be the technical difficulties which we might face in future if we proceed if DEV & QA is in one platform and PRD in another platform,
Eg,
Some issues might occur in DEV & QA but not in PROD.
I might not be able to replicate some DB related issues or kernel issue..
Issues/impacts like these.
Regards,
Vadivelan.N.

Similar Messages

Transporting a request in single system landscape

Hi,
I our single system landscape, we are using the scc1 t-code to transport a request from dev client to prd client,then it showing a message like target client is productive and protected against client copy for this reason every time we are changing the production client settings. please give me suggestions how to transport a request in single system landscape with out using scc1 t-code.
Regards,
Reddy

Olivier,
Are you sure SCC1 is just for client copy? I dont think so.
Client Copy transaction is SCCL for a local copy and SCC9 for remote client copy.
SCC1 allows to transport local requests within different clients, of course depending of what the transport request contains you can copy something simple or a lot of data (yes, I know, the title says something, but see the functionality).
I'm agree is not a good practice to have DEV and PRD in one server, but maybe he is using it for testing purposes? I saw different cases in the past and sometimes they had DEV and QA in one server, maybe this is the case.
Anyways, lets help him on his question.
Reddy, if you have any question, just post it.
Good luck,

Transport request in single system landscape

Hi,
In single system landscape we are having only two clients (dev & prd), we are using T-code scc1 to transport a request from dev client to prd client.for this every time we are changing the production client settings.could anyone suggest me how to transport a request with out using scc1.
Thanks & Regards,
Reddy v

Hi,
you have only one system and two clients? Then you simply cannot use CMS functionality. Maybe it is possible to create transport target group and set up a client dependent transport control, but I've never tried it on one system landscape. Read more: http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/44/b4a0137acc11d1899e0000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
If I where you I'd use virtualization and install two SAP systems on virtual machines, then use standard 2 system landscape. It's much safer for your repository!!!
Regs,
FS

Why MDM in homogenous or single system landscape

Hai expertise,
If at all i need to include MDM in a organization which include only SAP system.. what are all the advantages i will get out of MDM...
In single system landscape we use MDM at the time of upgradation of system..
Any advantages other than that???

Govada - You said that you have single system (SAP) landscape for your client...
but you have not clarified if you have other SAP systems like CRM,SRM,BW implemented for your client..If so..MDM will be helpful for consolidating and harmonizing master data across systems..
But if you client has only one R/3 system installed , MDM may not be useful...
Rule of thumb : MDM is fit for the scenarios where you have your Master data residing/being maintained by diffrent systems. (R/3 has its own customer maintainance and CRM has its own..) in this case MDM is of best use.
Cheers,
Aravind

R/3 & BIW Single system landscape

Hi Guys,
Right now we are in SAP 5.0 which has BIW 3.5 components. We are planning to implementing BIW,
my question is,
Can we use same development & quality system used for R/3 implementation for BIW implementation also without setting seperate landscape and keeping production server seperate from R/3.
If yes please provide related notes from SAP.
Points will be assigned even for any relevant answer.
Thanks,
Sujai

Hai,
i think it is possible if you are trying with BI 7.0 (needs WAS 7.00). But with BIW 3.5 it's not possible i think.. It should be a separate landscape..
regards,
Gopinathan.

ECC 6.0 Tree System Landscape distribute on different geographic site.

Dear experts, we have a important question.
In the context of our very important business project,
we may need to distribute our ECC6.0 "tree system landscape" on different geographic site and in detail:
DEV system    in Italy
QAS system    in Italy
PRD system    in America.
Besides the obvious restrictions, linked to network reliability and avalability, there are other constraints ?
Can be achieved this configuration ?
You know similar configurations ?
Give me, please, your opinions and considerations ?
Thanks and Regards
Massimo
Edited by: massimo perrella on Mar 13, 2008 4:47 PM

Hi,
We are having a running landscape of non-unicode system.
Now, Another Landscape is being used by parent company of Unicode Systems. Now, All data, programs, objects are being configured on the parent company server. So, there is no chance to migrate non-unicode to unicode.
But, We have to apply all packages developed on Non-unicode system to Unicode System. I have released that request and copied data file and cofile into target developement System (Unicode) then imported on this Server.
Now, we are facing this problem (Above mentioned.). I think, there must be a solution for it conceptually.
Regards
Dharmendra

ChaRM in two system landscape

Hello Everyone,
I want to implement ChaRM for BIW systems which is a two system landscape: BIWDEV and BIWLIVE . Is it posible to implement ChaRm in a two system landscape /we need three system landscape only for it.I started the ChaRM configuration work but faced certain issues over which i was told tat Charm needs three systems for implementation. Kindly plz suggest and confirm.
Regards,
Somya

Hey Somya,
2 system landscape will also work with CHARM.
CHARM can also be configured in single system landscape.
But the bottomline is you require in all 3 clients to realize charm.
These three clients can belong to same or diffrent systems altogether.
For you i would say, u will require 2 clients in BIWDEV system ( Say BIWDEV:100 as development cleint and BIWDEV:200 as Test client ).
Now you have BIWLIVE system which is our production system, so you require 1 client BIWLIVE system..
So your 3 clients are ready and Change Request management can be realized..
Please Reward with points if this postv was usefull..
Revert For ne clarifications ..
Regards,
Suzzane

Configure STMS & transports as a single system

Hello,
I configured STMS as a single DEV system, without QA and PRD. I have a requirement to import the transports into the DEV system, after copying cofiles and datafiles from another dev system.
Is it possible to move another system transports into DEV System, configuring it as a single system landscape. If it is possible, kindly provide the steps.
Thanks,
Mohi

Hi
What you meant by "transport do not move" ?
Check here for Configuring Single Systems - Software Logistics - SAP Library
Also as per Matt's update, the same transport request also can be moved from command prompt or shell (on any OS);
log into sidadm
from Command prompt,
1) add request into buffer (this step may not be required if added earlier - as per Matt's update)
tp addtobuffer <transport number> <SID> pf=/usr/sap/trans/bin/<transport profile, i.e. TP_DOMAIN_<SINGLE SYSTEM SID>.PFL
2) then use below tp command to import the specific requests;
tp import <transport number> <SID> CLIENT=<client number> pf=/usr/sap/trans/bin/<transport profile, i.e. TP_DOMAIN_<SINGLE SYSTEM SID>.PFL
regards
Swami

ChaRM - possible to have 2 different system landscapes in one project?

Hi,
can anyone tell me if it is possible to have 2 different system landscapes in one project. One landscape for developing and testing the Change Requests and another one for developing and testing the Bugfixes.
Thanks,
Martin

As Rick, mentions, there's no default way.
Having said that, there's nothing stopping you from doing it yourself. You can add a kind of language selector to the layout and set that for every html5 output. With some JavaScript, you can have the user switch between your outputs. It would look like content categories, but you'll have build it yourself.

SAP Three-System Landscape

Hi All,
I have a very basic doubt - I have read umpteen times that the SAP recommendation is to use a 3-system landscape for performance reasons. One system for the developement, one for quality assurance and one for the production environment.
However, I want more clarity on what a 'system' is. Does it mean I purchase 3 mySAP ERP licenses for my implementation and then implement DEV, QAS and PRD in each of them? But would that not multiple my costs 3 times if I decide to move from legacy system to an SAP implementation?
Thanks and Regards,
Vidya.

Srividya D. wrote:>
> Yes, all clients in a single SAP software get affected if any client-independent customizing. So do you mean by having different hardware systems for the different logical systems (DEV, QAS, PRD) client-independent customizing in one client in one hardware system does not affect another client in another hardware system? But I don't quite understand this since the concept of a client is per SAP system and not hardware system.
Yes. exactly if the system are different then any config/changes will not going to affect another system until unless you move any transport. Client is a buisness unit to identify the Buisness data, It is system specific.
> By an instance if you mean an SAP Application Server, though there are multiple application servers on multiple hardware systems, the underlying Repository (nothing but database) and client-independent data should still be common right? Or do you mean that if I implement 3 instances of the SAP ERP system over 3 hardware systems, each instance or application server then has its own client space which do not interfere with the clients in the other hardware system?
I mean to say you required 3 Hardware, for 3 Database, and 3 SAP instance, 1:1 concept. everything will be seperate and will not interfare with any other system.
Regards,
Subhash

Information on 3-System Landscape for XI

Hi All,
Currently we have DEV/QA XI as one system and Prod as another. We plan to seperate QA and have a 3 system landscape for XI... ie, DEV, TEST, PROD.
My Question is
> Any documents on what are the system requirements in doing so?
> Is there any advantage/disadvantage in doing this?
Pavan.

The sysetm configuration might be 2Gb+ Ram with good storage of Harddrive....there can be problem when you have both the dev and QA system on the same server or same instance with dfiferent client......
It;s better to have the Different system for DEV,QA and Production but as far as SLD is concerened standard says to maintain the single SLD but for production it will be good if kept seperate SLD.

Best practice: Webdynpro in a large system landscape

Dear Sirs,
I have a few questions about using Webdynpro (WD) in a large system landscape. After doing some research I understand there are a few alternatives, and I would like to get your opinions on the issue and links to any relevant documentation. I know most of my questions do not have a single answer, but I hope we can get a disussion, which will highlight the pro/cons.
My landscape consists of a full set of ECC and portal servers (DEV, QA, P) , where using WD to fetch BABIs from the backend and present them in the portal is a likely scenario.
Deploy the WD components on portal servers or on separate servers?
Would you deploy the WD components on the portal WAS or would you advice having a (or a number) of servers dedicated to running WD.
The way I see it, when you are having a large number of developers, giving away the SDM password to the portal server (DEV) in order for them to test WD applications is not advisable (or perhaps more true, not wanted by the basis). So perhaps a separate WAS for development of WD is advisable, and then let basis deploy them into the portal QA and PROD server. I do not think that each developer having its own local J2EE for testing is likely.
How about performance?, will any solution be preferable over an other. Will it be faster/slower to run WD on separate WAS.
Transporting the WD components
How should one transport the components and keep them pointing to the right JCO connections (as you have different JCO connections for (DEV, QA, P)), I have seen example with threads where you opt for a dynamic setting of the JCO connections through parameters. Is this the one to prefer?
Any documentation on this issue would be highly appreciated. (Already read: System Landscape Directory, SAP System Landscape Directory on SAP Web AS Java 6.40)

Look into using NWDI as your source code control (DTR) and transport/migration from dev through to production. This also will handle the deployment to your dev system (check-in/activate).
For unit testing and debugging you should be running a local version (NWDW). This way once the code is ready to be shared with the team, you check it in (makes it visible to other team members) and activate it (deploys it to development server).
We are currently using a separate server for WD applications rather than running them on the portal server. However, this does not allow for the WD app to run in the new WD iView. So it depends on what the WD app needs to do an have access to. Of course there is always the Federated Portal Network as an option, but that is a whole other topic.
For JCo connections, WD uses a connection name and this connection can be set up to point to different locations depending on which server it is on. So on the development server the JCo connection can point to the dev back-end and in prod point to the prod back-end. The JCo connections are not migrated, but setup in each system.
I hope this helps. There is a lot of documentation available for NWDI to get you started. See: http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/01/9c4940d1ba6913e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
-Cindy

System Landscape in EP6.0 SP9 (Urgent ..)

Hi,
We have installed EP6.0 SP9 on Win 2003 and Oracle.
After instalaltion I Created the System Landscape for R/3 Server. I maintained the Connector Properties,User Management Properties. Then i tested by creating the Transaction Iview after maintaining the USer Mapping Details. The Preview is working if i select the WINGUI.
Then i Tried to Test the Connections by Rightclick on the System Landscape Name. in that I tried to test the Connector Testing Option.
But the Test is getting failed by stating that the User Mapping and Connector Settings are wrong please check.
But when i see the preview of the Transaction it is working.
Secondly, I wanted to confirm about the SSO.
For SSO, and WEBGUI, I hope we require the ITS Instance in the Enterprise Portal. Is this Right?
In R/3 our Kernel Release is 6.40 and SAP_BASIS Release is 6.20 R/4 version 4.7
Here do i need WP_PI 6.0.620 Plugins or PI_BASIS_640?
As per the Note 655941 it says WP-PI is no longer delivered as of ABAP BASIS version 6.40. ( Here we are bit confused )
Please Help us..
Thanks & Regards
Sumanth

Hi Sumanth,
About SSO - There are different ways to enable single sign-on, user-mapping in portals is one of them and SAP Logon tickets is another. For each of these methods, refer portal security guide (service.sap.com/security). ITS or WEBGUI has got nothing to do with SSO in a direct manner.
About WEBGUI - You require ITS if you are going to use WEBGUI and since your R/3 kernel is 6.40 you have the option of using integrated ITS which has the option of webgui. Follow the link below for documentation for the same.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/54/4d9993c6592941a407313a6763575c/frameset.htm
ITS instance will never be on the portals, you will either have to use the integrated ITS or the separate standalone installation of ITS 6.20. Either way, while creating iViews for connecting to ITS system, make sure you use the GUI for HTML option.
About the SAP note - A portal plug-in is required if you want to enable SSO using Logon tickets, and your R/3 version is 4.6C or less. In your case portal plug-in is not required. Refer portal security guide for more details.
About your error - you have not mentioned the exact error message, but I guess, it is something about your user mapping.
Regards,
Aniket

Defining substitutes in a multi SAP component system landscape

Hi All,
I need some help trying to understand and figure out how to best proceed with a recommendation/solution for defining workflow substitutes in a new SAP installation that includes the following components: Netweaver 2004S, EP6, SRM5 and ERP 2005.
The client is planning to rollout various ESS, MSS, ERP and SRM workflows throughout the organization and use the UWL for all workflow scenarios.
Being new to the portal and UWL, I been reading and trying different things with respect to maintaining substitutes in the ERP and SRM systems as well as the UWL.
Ive figured out that the UWL substitute processing is not linked to the ERP and SRM functionality. This means that anyone responsible for approvals will need to log into the ERP system and define the required personal substitutes in the Workflow Inbox and then repeat the same process in the SRM Approval tab.
If the above is the only way to define substitutes, then the process will not be met with open arms for all sorts of reasons.
As Im new to these new SAP components, am I missing something? There is a simple solution to defining substitutes in this type of a system landscape or do you need to build something to provide the required/desired single entry point for both systems.
Also, what do the UWL substitutes provide?
Regards,
Jerry

Hi Jerry,
Yes the UWL does create substitutes across all connected SAP systems **PROVIDED**:
1. Each system has all the function modules prefixed SAP_WAPI_SUBSTITUT...
2. There is a mapping between the portal user and a user id in each of the systems
3. The user has the relevant authority (auth object S_WF_SUBST) to create/maintain/display substitutes in each of the systems
If you have the SAP_WAPI_SUBSTITUT... function modules in some systems but not others you should be able to copy them (you'll need some SSCR keys of course to copy them under SAP standard names) and everything should be fine. I've done this before to a 6.20 NetWeaver system and it worked fine.
If its still not working you need to check the support pack notes for EP6 - for instance you do need to be on at least EP6 SP14 patch 2 for all substitution features to work.
Regards,
Jocelyn

Multiple LDAP servers on single System

hi,
Would like to know if its a good idea to have multiple LDAP servers running on a single System (Hardware) ..
100,000 user base
We would like to run the old and new LDAP databases on the same server till we phase out the old LDAP database after migrating all applications..
System:
2 x V880 4CPU 8GB RAM --multi-master configuration
4 x V420R 4CPU 8GB RAM -- read only replicas

Shouldnt be an issue - thats not a particularly large user base and thats some heft y HW. Keep in mind though that they will be on different ports so any software you migrate may eventually need tweaking to the default port when the new takes over.

Single System Landscape on Different Platforms

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for