SIP VoIP 3.0 and IPv6

I have N85 RM-333, firmware 31.002. After I have set up dual IPv4/v6 stack, I started receiving "488 Not acceptable here" from the asterisk server. The problem turns to be in this SDP line sent by the handset:
c=IN IP6 2001:5c0:1507:c500:222:fcff:fed5:5497
While admittedly it's asterisk's "shortcoming" to not recognize IPv6 notation, I question the decision to use IPv6 addresses in SIP and SDP messages while the communication is actually done over IPv4 (as seen in the attached log). I would presume that IPv6 addresses should be used inside the messages only if these messages are going to be sent over IPv6.
Opinions? Anyone from Nokia to comment on this?
Thanks,
Eugene
Attachments:
asterisk-ipv6-problem.txt ‏3 KB

Go to contacts and see if you see 3 tabs. If there is a 3rd tab, see if it says activate or something like that (sorry can not remember now). From here you can choose to deactivate the connection and it will stop trying to connect.
Show the KUDOS button some love.... Hit that bad boy.... It don't hurt....
Apple iPhone 5,
Retina MacBook Pro, iPad Mini, Nikon D4

Similar Messages

E52 - Nokia SIP VoIP application - help needed

Hi there,
I am pretty new here. I need the Nokia SIP VoIP application for my E52, something like SIP_VoIP_3_1_Settings_S60_3.... .sis
Where can I get it?
My problem is, that I can set up easily an VoIP service with my phone and it connects perfectly. However, I can't use it with my E52 since I can't activitate it on my phone. I would need the option: > connection > Internet Tel. Settings which is not there.
I guess I need the Nokia SIP VoIP application, however I can't find a compatible version, and the SIP_VoIP_3_1_Settings_S60_5_x_v1_0_en.sis does not work.
Thanx
Caristeo

Although I've never used it, I was able to install the SIP Settings program for my E73 (same OS and Feature Pack as your phone) from http://www.developer.nokia.com/info/sw.nokia.com/id/d476061e-90ca-42e9-b3ea-1a852f3808ec/SIP_VoIP_Se... . (You need to make an account if you don't have one already.) Download the "SIP VOIP 3.x" version. I do have a Settings -> Connection -> SIP Settings option on my phone, as well as Control Panel -> Net Settings -> Advanced VOIP Settings. Hope that helps.

MB usage for SIP-VOIP ?

Does anyone have any experience on :-
1. How much data (GPRS mega-byte) used per minute for Skype over FRING,
2. How much data used for Google-talk
3. Similar apps.
I am using E71, with SIP-VOIP, GRPS, FRING, NIMBUZZ.
Thanks for your help !!
Harry

Hello giliadw,
Don’t wait for a built in function because that’s no where soon to be seen in near future. You should certainly contact a hosted PBX provider they definitely provide VoIP solutions for mobiles. You can simply function all the SIP tools through their application. I can recommend you my PBX VoIP provider The RealPBX, they have a decent phone application and services

SIP VoIP Settings energy consumption under 3G Vs W...

Hi everybody.
I'm suffering big pain with "SIP VoIP Settings" (SIP_VoIP_3_x_Settings_v2_0_en) because eats my E52 battery in a while (few hours).
The fact:
E52-1: 054.003.280.1 RM-469
Stand by mode under my 3G: 20 mWatt (5 mA). Figures are averages of one hour took with: Nokia_Energy_Profiler_v1_2_en.
Connection with my VoIP provider using "SIP VoIP Settings" under my WiFi: 41 mW (10 mA)
Connection with my VoIP provider using "SIP VoIP Settings" under my 3G: 297 mW (107 mA).
The ratio between 3G and WiFi is 8-10 times!
Nokia is aware of this issue (cfr. http://www.google.it/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=3&ved=0CEUQFjAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fr...) and I wonder if 5 years later there is a solution to it.
Anybody has an idea about obtimal configuration of "SIP VoIP Settings"?
Best regards.
GN

Hi eveybody, an add on to my post.
Regards.
Attachments:
Compare results energy SIP VoIP.pdf ‏54 KB

Error downloading SIP VOIP settings application

Hello!
I have a n85 and I've tried to download the SIP voip app 3.x from
http://www.forum.nokia.com/info/sw.nokia.com/id/d476061e-90ca-42e9-b3ea-1a852f3808ec/SIP_VoIP_Settin...
and it always give me an error.
Is it possible that someone who downloaded it correctly could send it to me?
Thanks!

If your office network is behind a firewall that blocks the ports that are necessary for correct operation of SIP then there's nothing you can do to get it working properly. At least not directly.
What you can try is using a 3rd-party application such as fring. Fring allows you to set up a generic SIP session with the VoIP provider of your choice. You connect to fring's systems over a single-port, proprietary connection, and fring connects to your SIP provider instead of you.
It's obviously not as good as a direct connection between you and the VoIP provider but at least it works. I'm more or less forced to do that now with the N96 having no other real SIP support.
Was this post helpful? If so, please click on the white "Kudos!" star below. Thank you!

Nokia e52 WLAN/SIP/VoIP auto connects. Plz help.

Hi,
WLAN/SIP/VoIP on my E52 auto connects evey time it finds a wireless network. I have turned off WLAN monitor but problem is still there.
Any ideas how can i make it manual?
Thanks
David
Solved!
Go to Solution.

disable automatic internet connection from those apps which needs internet and by default they have automatic connection option like world traveler, world mate if u have installed it and mail for exchange.
¨Arm yourself because no one else here will save you¨

How to use linphone - open sip VoIP library in Windows desktop application.?

I want to develop an VoIP .net application in C# lang for windows desktop. Does anyone know any open sip VoIP library to use.? I know about Linphone. but it is available for Android, iOS and Windows(app developed using GTK- UI builder). If anyone knows how
to use Linphone for windows then ans also will be appreciated.
I am using MS visual studio for application development. Tell me its compiling steps as well. How to use that in WPF or WinForms.?
Thanks in advance.

Hello,
The VoIP seems not MS product and can you clarify it? Basically, if it is third party product, you will need to ask for the API writer for details. For example, find a forum here:
http://www.linphone.org/
Regards,
Barry Wang
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

BlackBerry SIP VoIP Client / fgmicrotec

We are beta testing our BlackBerry SIP VoIP client und would like to invite everyone to join the trial phase. The registration is quick and simple and can be found here:
http://www.fgmicrotec.com/BlackBerry-VoIP.html
Here are a few facts:
- the client comes preconfigured with a test account on our system
- you can reconfigure the client to use any VoIP provider
- use it with your own SIP capable PBX (i.e Asterisk)
- dial from anywhere (call history, contacts, emails, SMS etc.)
- trial users with good bug reports get commercial license for free
- quick and reliable support via our forum http://www.fgmicrotec.com/forum/index.php

I had the similiar problem and finally I found solution:
www.sipVoipSdk.com

Sip voip settings

hi, i am having difficulties making internet calls to mobile/landline/international numbers. I have no difficulties in registering my sip account and making internet calls to other sip account holders. What I notice is that for any internet calls domain name is also appended, for ex [email protected]. I am using nokia E63.
Any suggestions please

Hi eveybody, an add on to my post.
Regards.
Attachments:
Compare results energy SIP VoIP.pdf ‏54 KB

Cisco IOS Zone Based Firewall and IPv6

Hello,
I am trying to setup IPv6 tunnel to tunnel-broker Hurrican Electrics. IPv6 connection is working OK only if I disable zone security on WAN interface (Fe0 - IPv4 interface).
Which protocols must be alloved to and from router?
IOS version: 15.1.2T1 (Adv.ip services)
Setup:
HE (tunnel-broker) --- Internet (IPv4) ---- Cisco 1812 (Fe0 (IPv4) and interface tunnel 1 (IPv6))
Config on router:
IPv4 (self to internet and internet to self)
policy-map type inspect Outside2Router-pmap
class type inspect SSHaccess-cmap
inspect
class type inspect ICMP-cmap
inspect
class type inspect IPSEC-cmap
pass
class type inspect Protocol41-cmap
pass log
class class-default
drop
interface Tunnel1
description Hurricane Electric IPv6 Tunnel Broker
no ip address
zone-member security IPv6tunnel
ipv6 address 2001:47:25:105B::2/64
ipv6 enable
ipv6 mtu 1300
tunnel source FastEthernet0
tunnel mode ipv6ip
tunnel destination xxx.66.80.98
interface FastEthernet0
description WAN interface
ip address xxx.xxx.252.84 255.255.0.0
no ip redirects
no ip unreachables
no ip proxy-arp
zone-member security WAN
duplex auto
speed auto
zone-pair security IPv6Tunnel_2_WAN source IPv6tunnel destination WAN
service-policy type inspect IPv6-out-pmap
zone-pair security WAN_2_IPv6tunnel source WAN destination IPv6tunnel
service-policy type inspect IPv6-out-pmap
policy-map type inspect IPv6-out-pmap
class type inspect IPv6-internet-class
inspect
class class-default
drop
class-map type inspect match-all IPv6-internet-class
match protocol tcp
match protocol udp
match protocol icmp
match protocol ftp
ipv6 route ::/0 Tunnel1
ipv6 unicast-routing
ipv6 cef
parameter-map type inspect v6-param-map
ipv6 routing-header-enforcement loose
sessions maximum 10000

OK, removed the cmap the packet was getting dropped on, so the current self to wan zone-pair policy map looks like this:
policy-map type inspect pm-selftowan
class type inspect cm-selftowan-he-out
inspect
class type inspect cm-dhcpwan
pass
class class-default
drop
class-map type inspect match-all cm-selftowan-he-out
match access-group name HETunnelOutbound
ip access-list extended HETunnelOutbound
permit 41 any any
permit ip any host 64.62.200.2
permit ip any host 66.220.2.74
permit ip any host 216.66.80.26
Now we see the same error, just on the 'new' first cmap in the pmap:
*Oct 5 02:39:31.316 GMT: %FW-6-DROP_PKT: Dropping Unknown-l4 session :0 216.66.80.26:0 on zone-pair selftowan class cm-selftowan-he-out due to Invalid Segment with ip ident 0
Yet as you can see above, we are allowing proto 41 any any.
I didn't expect any other result really since the previous cmap had 'permit ip any any' but still
any ideas?
Thanks,
//TrX
EDIT: Out of curiosity after reading this post: https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2043222?decorator=print&displayFullThread=true
I decided to change the outbound cm-selftowan-he-out action to 'pass'.
I suddently noticed the following log:
*Oct 5 02:39:31.316 GMT: %FW-6-DROP_PKT: Dropping Unknown-l4 session 216.66.80.26:0 :0 on zone-pair wantoself class cm-wantoself-he-in due to Invalid Segment with ip ident 0
Notice this is now inbound having trouble where as before was outbound.
I changed the inbound pmap policy for cmap cm-wantoself-he-in to pass also and IPv6 PACKETS ARE GETTING ICMP6 REPLIES FROM GOOGLE!
Looking at the original outbound PMAP:
policy-map type inspect pm-selftowan
class type inspect cm-selftowan
inspect
class type inspect cm-selftowan-he-out
inspect
class type inspect cm-dhcpwan
pass
class class-default
drop
cm-selftowan has always been infront of cm-selftowan-he-out, and because that is ip any any, it has been 'grabbing' the IP proto 41 packets and doing ip inspect on them (which fails as it seems ip inspect only handles a handful of proto's).
This is why setting cm-selftowan-he-out and cm-wantoself-he-in both to 'pass' instead of 'inspect' in the past has not been doing anything, because the outbound packets were never getting to the cm-selftowan-he-out cmap.
Would never have got to this without ip inspect log. Why didn't I think of just trying ip inspect logging two days ago!
Anyway, thank you, I have now restored my faith in my own knowledge of ZBF!
Hope this helps the OP too
//TrX

Network Load Balancing and IPv6 Ping Timeout

I've noticed interesting behavior with NLB on Windows 2012 R2 and IPv6. I have two systems that use NLB on a Hyper-V cluster, each system is on a different node in the cluster. When I do an IPv6 ping within the same subnet, I notice that the reply time is
normally 1-3ms, but every so often it goes to 100+ms. I also notice that both members of the NLB reply to a ping to the cluster IPv6 address. This is interesting.
When I do a ping to the cluster IPv6 address from a different subnet, I notice that the reply is intermittent. The NLB nodes will either both reply to the ping or both won't. At first I thought that there was an issue with my network, but when I do a span
on the ports that the cluster is attached to, I see that the IPv6 ping packets arrive, but the NLB nodes don't always send a reply.
What is also interesting is that the NLB web farm I have setup seem to be working fine and is not intermittent, so this issue only has to do with ping. Has anyone else seen this type of issue, or is this a bug?
Thanks!

Hi Nathan,
So are you running both IPV6 and IPV4? Do you have any clients that can't connect at all? Just on ping?
The reason I ask is we had a server that was receiving IPV6 fine, but on receiving IPV4 would switch to IPV6 to connect SSL back to the client. Of course the clients never received it and just got a timeout. Funny thing is cell phones had no issue
at all because they were straight IPV6. Only clients with both protocols got the timeout.
So the ack was send back via the wrong protocol and nothing but the timeout is what the client sees. This may be an LLMNR issue. It came out from 2008R2 but think it may still apply
Check this out:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb878128.aspx
David Perkins
IT Help Point, Inc.

Best way to pass IPv4 and IPv6 traffic over a GRE Tunnel

Hello,
We have two 3825 routers with Advanced Enterprise IOS 12.4.9(T). Each of them serves many IPv4 (private and public) and IPv6 networks on their respective site.
We have created a wireless link between the two, using 4 wireless devices, with IP Addresses 10.10.2.2, 3, 4, 5 respectively (1 and 6 are the two end Ethernet interfaces on the routers).
Then we created a GRE tunnel over this link using addresses 172.16.1.1 and 2 (for the two ends) to route traffic over this link.
Now we want to route IPv6 traffic over the same link. However, we found that simply routing the IPv6 traffic over the above GRE / IP tunnel did not work.
Questions:
Is there a way we can use the same (GRE / IP) tunnel to transport both IPv4 and IPv6 traffic?
If not, can we setup two GRE tunnels over the same wireless link, that is, one GRE / IP for IPv4 traffic and a second one GRE / IPv6 for IPv6 traffic?
In brief, what is the suggested way to transport IPv4 and IPv6 traffic over the aforementioned (wireless) link?
I have read http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios/12_4/interface/configuration/guide/inb_tun.html#wp1061361 and other Internet material, however I am still confused.
Please help.
Thanks in advance,
Nick

We have set up two tunnels over the same link, one GRE / IP for the IPv4 traffic and one IPv6 / IP ("manual") for the IPv6 traffic. This setup seems to be working OK.
If there are other suggestions, please advise.
Thanks,
Nick

Firewall and IPv6, how to block ports?

I am using free.fr in France, and IPv6 is enabled as part of the service. There are certain services running that were only accessible to the local network, but I now find that if I know the IPv6 address of the machine they are world accessible. I tried limiting services to be only accessible to the local machine, by adjusting the settings in the Firewall configurations in the system preferences, but the services still seem to be world accessible. Do the firewall configurations ignore IPv6? Is there any way to make it so that services are only available to machines in the local networks via IPv6. I suspect I going to need a command line tool or a third-party tool, but I am willing to deal with this until Apple sorts this out through a security update (please?).
The machine in question is a G4 based PowerMac, so I can't upgrade to 10.5.

Hi Andre,
The machine in question is a G4 based PowerMac, so I can't upgrade to 10.5.
What speed is it? 867
Leopard requirements...
* Mac computer with an Intel, PowerPC G5, or PowerPC G4 (867MHz or faster) processor
minimum system requirements
* 512MB of memory
* DVD drive for installation
* 9GB of available disk space
Not sure on IPv6, since the whole purpose seems to be to pinpoint individual computers to the whole world, but IPFW may still work...
WaterRoof is a firewall management frontend with bandwidth tuning, NAT setup, port redirection, dynamic rules tracking, predefined rule sets, wizard, logs, statistics and other features...
http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/23317
See also...
http://oreilly.com/pub/a/mac/2005/03/15/firewall.html
http://tadek.pietraszek.org/blog/2007/05/01/adding-custom-firewall-rules-in-osx/

WLC and IPv6

Hi All,
has anybody experiences with WLC and IPv6? I have activated the Check Box for IPv6 Support, but it does not work. Regards, Michael

Hi ,
Have you configued uplink router/sw to support ipv6 ; the sample config would look like this
ipv6 unicast-routing
interface FastEthernet0/0.6
encapsulation dot1Q 56
ip address 10.50.56.1 255.255.255.0
ip access-group GNS2 in
ip access-group GNS2 out
ip helper-address 10.50.1.21
ip pim sparse-dense-mode
ip multicast ttl-threshold 1
no snmp trap link-status
ipv6 address 2006::/64 eui-64
ipv6 address autoconfig
ipv6 enable
let me if this works for you or not
regards
Seema

U-verse, Time Capsule and IPv6

Can anyone recommend the best settings related to IPv6 when using ATT U-verse and Time Capsule? Time Capsule is set-up in Bridge Mode and IPv6 enabled on U-Verse Modem/Router.
Should IPv6 be set to Automatic or Link-Local on Time Capsule or should I disable IPv6 all together?

Because the other settings either do not work, or do not work reliably.....but Apple is "working on it".

SIP VoIP 3.0 and IPv6

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for