Siri on a non 3G connection

After looking on the net and on here, I cannot seem to find if Siri will only work while on a 3G connection.
I'm basically wanting to know if I would still be able to use Siri on EDGE or GPRS.
I've look on Apple's site but all it says about Siri is:
Siri is available in Beta only on iPhone 4S and requires Internet access. Siri may not be available in all languages or in all areas, and features may vary by area. Mobile data charges may apply.
I live in the UK.
Thanks in advance.

Thanks for the extremely helpful reply Charmar. The help is much appreciated.
Re already having the iPhone 4.
I get my iPhone's from the Apple site. I tend to get the new model every time they are launched has I find this way I can get the maximum price for my old iPhone (I've got my iPhone 4 sold to a friend when I get my 4S for £300). This then means that i get a lot of my money back towards the new iPhone.
If I were to keep my iPhone and sell it when it was 2 generations old, I would probably get only half the price, meaning I would have a lot more money to put towards the new iPhone I would be getting at that time.
Slightly off topic. I popped into my local car phone warehouse, they have a 4S on a demo stand. The 4S was on O2. I placed my iPhone 4 next to it, and my Phone 4 showed 2 bars off of maximum, the iPhone 4S showed a stronger signal than my iPhone 4. I expect this is due to the dual antenna on the 4S, interesting never the less.

Similar Messages

Using OCIBindDynamic with non-blocking connections

I need to use an OCI array interface for execute statements more than once per one request to server.
When I have called stored procedure or function in the non-blocking connection context using OCIBindDynamic for parameter binding, application have been crashed at random time.
I don't have any problems using default (blocking) mode.
Environment:
Oracle 8.1.7 release 3 for Windows
MS Visual C++ 6.0 compiler
Could anybody help me ?

It's always possible in any read that the number of bytes read is less than the number of bytes requested. You need to keep reading until you have got everything you expected, and cope with every possible error condition on each iteration.
EJP

Forefront TMG disconnected a non-TCP connection

Hi,
I am getting the following error alerts in TMG
Forefront TMG disconnected a non-TCP connection from 192.168.0.1 because the connection limit for this IP address was exceeded. Larger custom connection limits should be configured for the IP addresses of chained proxy servers and back-to-back Forefront
TMG computers with a NAT relationship.
This error show two msgs for my both dns servers.
My DNS servers Ip addresses
192.168.0.1
192.168.0.2
Please help me out
Thanks

Hi,
How about editing the Maximum non TCP sessions per second per rule setting?
For more information:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd441028.aspx
Best Regards,
Joyce
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

Warning message about non XA connection factory

Hi,
I'm using 10.0 MP2 and deployed an MDB which uses TransactionManagementType.CONTAINER with TransactionAttributeType.NOT_SUPPORTED. As I don't need a transaction I am referencing a non XA Connection Factory.
I am seeing this message in the logs..
<04-Nov-2010 10:29:54 o'clock GMT> <Warning> <JMSPool> <BEA-169817> <The JMS connection factory resource localconnFactory declared in the EJB "WLPooledSonicJmsTransactionNotSupportedMessageDrivenBean" as part of application "sampleejbs-ear-0" does not support XA. It cannot be used inside a transaction context.>
Can I safely ignore this warning?
Thanks
Mandy

As long as you do not use it inside a transaction, you do not have to worry.

Using non blocking connect() call for SCTP sockets in Solaris10

Hi,
I have a problem with non blocking connect call on SCTP socket.
I am using the sctp stack support in Solaris10.
When the connect is successful, I can get the pollout event on the socket.
But there is no event observed when the peer does not exist. In other words, I could not get the pollout event on connection failure. This logic works fine with TCP sockets on both Solaris and Suse10.
I am working with SCTP one-to-one style sockets.
Is there any way to handle this issue?
Do I need to load any patch to resolve this issue?
It will be great if I get a solution in this regard.
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
Bipin.

There are at least two problems here.
A. In the receiver you should test for -1 from the read() immediately, rather than continue with the loop and try to write -1 bytes to the file.
B. In the sender you are ignoring the return value of client.write(), which can be anything from 0 to the buffer length. If you get 0 you should wait for another OP_WRITE to trigger; if you get a 'short write' you need to retry it until you've got nothing left to write from the current buffer, before you read any more data. This is where the data is vanishing.

Non-blocking connection on a SocketChannel?

I'm trying out the non-blocking connection of a SocketChannel. So I wrote the following test code and supply a list of IPs (both good and bad IPs). But disregard the IPs I always get the result of a channel being in connection pending state (even for some bogus IPs). Any help will be great.
public class ConnectTest
    public static void main(String[] args) throws
Exception
        List<SocketChannel> channels = new ArrayList<SocketChannel>();
        for ( String s: args )
            SocketChannel channel = SocketChannel.open();
            channel.configureBlocking(false);
            channels.add(channel);
            InetSocketAddress remote = new InetSocketAddress(s, 80);
            channel.connect(remote);
        System.out.println("wait for timeout...");
        Thread.sleep(10000);
        for ( SocketChannel c : channels )
            if ( c.isConnected() )
                System.out.println(c.socket().getInetAddress() + " connected ");
            else if ( c.isConnectionPending() )
                System.out.println(c.socket().getInetAddress() + " connection pending ");
            else
                System.out.println(c.socket().getInetAddress() + " timeout ");
            c.close();
}

Forget the sleep: use a Selector, selecting on OP_CONNECT. When you get it, call SocketChannel.finishConnect() for the channel(s) selected. If that method returns 'true', the connection is complete. If it returns 'false', the connection is still pending (and in fact OP_CONNECT should not have fired); if it throws an exception, the connection attempt has failed.
If the connection is complete you must also deregister it for OP_CONNECT before registering it for OP_READ or OP_WRITE.

Control Packets over non-MPLS connection

Is it possible to configure Cisco router 7204 to send BGP packets not over LSP that has been established for the BGP peer, PE router, but over non-MPLS connection, while all data traffic to the PE router get forwarded through the LSP. In other words, I'm wondering it is possible to constrain all control
packets, including BGP, OSPF and LDP, to the non-MPLS interfaces, even though the LSP exists for the destination prefixes for the BGP packets.
I hope it could be applied to establishing MP-iBGP sessions between PE routers in MPLS/VPN network, in other words, we want all BGP packets not be forwarded through the LSP established between two PE routers, which is actually an ATM LER system since we have established non-MPLS connections between LERs in order to forward control packets including routing protocol and MPLS signaling protocol.
Any response will greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Yongjun.

Yongjun,
r1------r2-----r3
\-------r4----/
r1, r3 are PEs
r2 is a P rotuer
r4 is a non-LSR
r1-r2-r3 is LSP
r1-r4-r3 is a ip path, non-lsp
Then, you can do 'local-policy routing on r1 and r3 to send the Bgp control traffic over r1--r4--r3 path.
config on r1:
ip local policy route-map foo
route-map foo perm 10
match ip addr 100
set ip next-hop
access-list 100 perm tcp host eq 179 host
access-list 100 perm tcp host host eq 179
you got to do similar config on r3.
let me know if you have further q's.
best regards,
gopal

Is CS6 the last version able to install on a non-Internet-connected network?

I work on a govt network, which has no connection to the Internet, so we just purchased Photoshop CS6. Of course, we're having all sorts of problems because the damn application requires an Internet connection before it will run. We're working with Adobe to try to find a way around this, but it's extremely frustrating. I'm guessing we'll eventually be able to get an installer that doesn't try to connect to the Internet.
My question is: Assuming we can get PS CS6 functioning, is that the last version Adobe will build that will be installable on a non-Internet-connected network? That seems a bit short-sighted and will eventually cause the govt to remove all Adobe products from use. I can't imagine that's a scenario Adobe would be happy with, but maybe they don't care.
Thoughts? Does anybody else use Adobe products on a network that has no way to connect to the Internet? Have you found good workarounds for working with these annoying apps?

Thanks, John. I knew that, but have no way of registering or activating after install. I know that an installer can be built with the Serial Number built in that doesn't require an Internet connection, but I've never been able to get that to work. It takes half a day just to get the transfer approved to move it to the correct network, and after doing this six times, I've run out of patience. I'm not really sure what to do at this point. After over six hours on the phone with Adobe support, I've come to a brick wall. Adobe products are no longer viable on government networks. I'm surprised they've given up this large pool of users...

JDK 1.4 nio non-blocking connects don't finish

I am working with the Linux version of JDK1.4, doing some testing of the
non-blocking capability. The few tests that I have done have shown some
strange results:
- When opening a non-blocking connection to a server which has an
announcement banner, say such as POP which gives something like:
+OK pop3 server ready
then connection seems to be OK and proceed through to completion.
- When opening a non-blocking connection to a server which is silent, and
expects me to start the conversation, such as contacting an HTTP server,
then the Selector.select() never returns to allow me to finish the
connection.
Below is a test program which illustrates the problem for me.
It attempts to open a non-blocking connection to www.yahoo.com on port 80.
It then drops into a Selector.select() where I am waiting for the chance to
catch the SelectionKey.OP_CONNECT event and finish connecting, and then send
a simple HTTP GET request down the wire. That OP_CONNECT event
never seems to arrive though, and I remain stuck in the select().
'netstat -na' shows that I am in a connection established state.
Any insight appreciated,
-Steve M [email protected]
------------------>8 cut here 8<-----------------------
import java.io.*;
import java.net.*;
import java.util.*;
import java.nio.*;
import java.nio.channels.*;
public class NoWorkee
public static String GET_REQUEST = "GET / HTTP/1.0\r\n\r\n";
    static class Context
        String host;
        int    port;
        ByteBuffer request;
        public Context (String h, int p, ByteBuffer r)
        {host=h; port=p; request=r;}
Selector sel = null;
boolean keepGoing = true;
public NoWorkee()
    throws IOException
    sel = Selector.open();
public void add(String host, int port)
    throws IOException
    int ops = SelectionKey.OP_CONNECT;
    // create non-blocking socket, and initiate connect operation
    SocketChannel sc = SocketChannel.open();
    sc.configureBlocking(false);
    sc.connect(new InetSocketAddress(InetAddress.getByName(host), port));
    SelectionKey sk;
    try
        sk = sc.register(sel, ops);
        System.out.println ( "sc.register looks good connected=" +
            sc.isConnected() + ", isConnectionPending=" +
            sc.isConnectionPending());
        sk.attach(new Context(host, port, ByteBuffer.wrap(GET_REQUEST.getBytes())));
    catch (IOException x)
        x.printStackTrace();
        sc.close();
public void run()
    throws IOException
    keepGoing = true;
    System.out.println ( "Selecting " + sel.keys().size() + " SelectKeys");
    while (keepGoing)
        final long before = System.currentTimeMillis();
        final int numReady = sel.select();
        //final int numReady = sel.select(1000);
        final long after = System.currentTimeMillis();
        System.out.println ( "Blocked " + (after-before) + " ms, numReady=" + numReady);
        if (numReady > 0)
            Set readyKeys = sel.selectedKeys();
            System.out.println ( "Selected keys size " + readyKeys.size());
            for (Iterator it = readyKeys.iterator(); it.hasNext();)
                SelectionKey sk = (SelectionKey)it.next();
                SocketChannel sockChan = (SocketChannel)sk.channel();
                Context ctx = (Context)sk.attachment();
                System.out.println ( "Servicing host " + ctx.host + " port "
                             ctx.port);
System.out.println ( "1");
                if (sk.isConnectable())
                    if (sockChan.finishConnect())
                        System.out.println ( "Finished connecting success "
+ sockChan);
                        int ops = SelectionKey.OP_READ | SelectionKey.OP_WRITE;
                        sk.interestOps (ops);
                    else
                        System.out.println ( "Could not finishConnect for "
                            sockChan);
                        sk.cancel();
                        sockChan.close();
System.out.println ( "2");
                if (sk.isAcceptable())
                    System.out.println ( "in sk.isAcceptable() block");
System.out.println ( "3");
                if (sk.isReadable())
                    System.out.println ( "in sk.isReadable() block");
                    byte rawBuff[] = new byte[32 * 1024];
                    ByteBuffer buff = ByteBuffer.wrap(rawBuff);
                    int numRead = -1;
                    while (0 < (numRead = sockChan.read(buff)))
                        System.out.println ( "numRead = " + numRead);
                        for (int i = 0; i < numRead; i++)
                            System.out.print((char)rawBuff);
System.out.println ( "numRead = " + numRead);
System.out.println ( "4");
if (sk.isWritable())
System.out.println ( "in sk.isReadable() block");
int numWritten = -1;
if (null != ctx.request)
numWritten = sockChan.write(ctx.request);
if (!ctx.request.hasRemaining())
sk.interestOps(sk.interestOps() &
~SelectionKey.OP_WRITE);
System.out.println ( "numWritten = " + numWritten);
//else
// service timeouts
public static void main (String arg[])
try
NoWorkee bla = new NoWorkee();
bla.add ("www.yahoo.com", 80);
bla.run();
catch (Exception e)
e.printStackTrace();
------------------>8 cut here 8<-----------------------

Just for the benefit of anyone who might be seeing the same problem, it looks like bug 4457776 accurately describes the problem that I was having above.
I am downloading j2sdk-1_4_0-beta2-linux-i386-rpm.bin to see if that fixed it.
Reference:
http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4457776.html

How to prevent packet forwarding over non-MPLS connection.

I'm wondering if it is possible to configure Cisco ESR to not forward packet over non-MPLS connection(VPI/VCI=0/32) when an LSP for its destination has not been established, while allowing control packets(BGP, LDP, OSPF) to be sent over non-MPLS connection. The reason why I ask about is as follows.
Referring to the following network configuration,
R1 --- Cisco_ESR --- ATM_LSR --- LER --- R2
<--> non-MPLS connection
----------------------->
LSPs
----------------------->
In the ordinary operation, when a packet arrives at Cisco_LER from R1, it gets forwarded over an LSP if available, while getting forwarded over non-MPLS connection(VPI/VCI=0/32) if the corresponding LSP is not available. In the configuration mentioned above,ATM_LSR does software-based packet processing for incoming packet through non-MPLS channel, while doing cell-switching for LSP traffic. Thus if ESR sends packet over non-MPLS connection, e.g, STM-1c, the ATM_LSR could get crashed or time-critical control traffic could be delayed or lost, thereby resulting in BGP/LDP session failure between ESR and ATM_LSR or LER.
In summary, my question is how to prevent Cisco_ESR from forwarding packets over non-MPLS connection when LSPs for their destinations are not available due to LSP failures.
Thanks.
Yongjun.

It already is, except for Aliens, they have access to everything on your phone(they always have had this access) .

Sap to non sap connection

Hi,
Can any one help me, how to connect to non sap server using 'HTTP connection to Extn. Server'(G)
in SM59.
What is the "Service No" and "Path Prefix" in the above connection type.
Thanks,
Rajesh

Hi,
Service No is the extrenal system id. it is a number like 1080, 5000 ..etc
Path Prefix is the path of the connection is the external system like if your external system is xxx
full path for your connection is xxx.com/test.xml
means path prefix is test.xml

Non-Oracle connection through HS issue

Greetings!
I have created a HS to a MySQL server and from SQL> this works fine as a dblink
create database link "dvb_mysqllink"
connect to "sord_ro"
identified by "<pwd>"
using 'mysqlSORDdev_cmdb';
SQL> select 'foo' from dual@dvb_mysqllink;
'FOO'
foo
What do I do to use this HS from OWB?
1) In "Design Center" I select Databases->Non-Oracle->ODBC->"new" (via right click)
2) I name the Module "MYSQL_HS"
3) I edit (and rename) the resulting Location to MYSQL_HS_LOCATION and use:
4) Type: HOST:PORT:SERVICE
5) USER NAME: (username on Mysql same as dblink above)
6) Password: (password on Mysql same as dblink above)
7) Host (the database that holds the HS listener, same server the dblink is created in)
8) Port 1521
9) Service Name: "mysqlSORDdev_cmdb" (the same DNS/TNSLISTENER value used in the dblink)
when I hit test connection I get:
ORA-28500: connection from ORACLE to a non-Oracle system returned this message:
[Generic Connectivity Using ODBC][MySQL][ODBC 3.51 Driver]Access denied for user 'SORD_RO'@'DSS0W023' (using password: YES) (SQL State: S1000; SQL Code: 1045)
ORA-02063: preceding 2 lines from OWB_961
I know the user/name password are correct as they're the same I use when creating the dblink via SQL....
Should I not use ODBC? Did I bump my head somewhere?
Any help here would be great.
Thanks in advance,
Dave-

You have to do the following steps:
1) In "Design Center", select Databases->Non-Oracle->ODBC->"new" (via right click)
2) Name the Module
3) Type Database Link
4) From Location: select the location of the database you have configured the databse link.
5) Database Link: if all is correct, you can select here the "dvb_mysqllink" databse link.
6) Test the connection.
I did those steps and it works, but i have a problem. When i want to import some tables, i can see the tables in the import wizard, but it don't import anything. The wizard is closed with no messages. Help, please!!

Data source for application using both pooled and non pooled connections

Hi guys.
I am integrating Oracle's connection pooling into an existing application that had formerly used dbConnectionBroker. It looks like this task should be quite straightforward. However, for consistency, I would also like to replace other Connection logic within the application to use Oracle classes. This will involve using OracleDataSource to obtain a Connection object. ( without pooling ).
So in this case, the application will use both pooled and non pooled Oracle connections. They will be connecting to the same database. The question I have is in regard to the use of data-sources.xml.
Are there any special considerations for the required attribute values within data-sources.xml under this scenario ?
Help will be greatly appreciated.
Regards.
Steve.

Hi Steve -
It should be feasible for you to define a single datasource using multiple location entries to indicate what sort of pooling behaviour you wish to use.
If you lookup and use the "location" attribute, you will receive a javax.sql.DataSource object which will not provide connection pooling.
If you lookup and use the "ejb-location" attribute you will receive a DataSource object that will support connection pooling operations.
Note that this is using the emulated datasource approach, and transaction support is limited to a single resource (one database) for these datasources - you won't get 2PC support for transactions.
If you need a transaction to span two separate resources (ie two databases in same tx) then you will need to use the non-emulated datasource approach.
There is a chapter in the J2EE Services Guide which describes the datasource model we have with OC4J. This might provide you with some more useful information. See Chapter 11 - http://otn.oracle.com/docs/products/ias/doc_library/903doc_otn/generic.903/a97690/ds3.htm#1004903
cheers
-steve-

Siri is not able to connect to the internet with or without wifi. Anyone know why?

Is anyone else having trouble with Siri today?

When siri gives you that message, it means the servers are either down or busy. It doesn't necessarily mean YOU aren't connected to the network. Siri is still in beta and apple is continuously working to improve it. So occaisonal problems such as these are common.

Siri has lost volume when connected to internet. all else works perfectly even siri when off the internet

Tech support said it is a beta system and no guarantee to get it fixed. When I called the Apple store they were not aware that Siri is Beta. Now I have to drive many miles with my new Ipad to try to get it fixed. OR replaced. They don't make it easy. MyI phone took three vists and two replacement phones to have an operational system. APPLE will not even allow for any compensation for their problem. NO "gifts" to make up for the miles and the time the problem causes you. I have bought Apple stock and now see it dropping and it will continue to drop if they do not change their customer service. This is not the old Apple which I based my whole office on. In the past year two purchases. I phone 4s and the new IPad . Both with problems requiring my efforts, car travel, and time to try to get fixed.
Does anyone have a solution to the loss of volume on the siri function that only occurs when connected to the internet? All other functions have full volume Don

If the modem is also a router, either use the modem in bridge and run pppoe client on the TC.. that is assuming ADSL or similar eg vdsl. If it is cable service.. and the modem is a router, then bridge the TC.. go to internet page and select connect by ethernet and below that set connection sharing to bridge.
Please tell us more about the modem if the above gives you issues.

Siri on a non 3G connection

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for