Site pages issue, the aspx file did not update, why ?

hi I have issue with the sharepoint designer 2013
when I have updated my <WebPartPages:DataFormWebPart, ect. move column up and down, nothing happened, when I preview in the browser ???
It is the same as before ? what can I do to change this ?
IT look like it is the same version before the change !

Are you signed in to SharePoint with the same account you are using to make the changes in SharePoint Designer? If the page is checked out to you, only you will be able to see the changes you are making before you check the page back in.
If anonymous access is enabled, make sure you sign in so that you are able to see your changes before everyone else does.
As a last resort, make sure you are looking at the right page in the right environment at the right URL. I've made that mistake before! To be absolutely sure, you can launch the page by pressing <F12> or click the "Preview in Browser" button in SharePoint
Designer to launch a web browser pointed to that page. Again, make absolutely certain you are signed in to SharePoint with the same account you are using to make the changes.
If you are absolutely certain of this, use InPrivate browsing (or a different browser) to ensure you aren't viewing a browser cached version of the page.
Danny Jessee<br/> MCPD - SharePoint Developer 2010<br/> MCTS - SharePoint 2010, Configuring<br/> dannyjessee.com/blog

Similar Messages

  • The configuration file did not contain well formed AppV configuration XML - When using Office 2013 ODT package

    All,
    I'm experiencing an issue where when using the Office 2013 package pulled down from ODT, that if I try to change the locations of either InfoPath Filler 2013 or Publisher 2013 from the default of Microsoft Office 2013 then I receive the message "The
    configuration file did not contain well formed AppV configuration XML. Please check the management server event log for more information". If I check Applications and Services\Microsoft\AppV\Server-Management\Admin the error displayed there is "An
    error was encountered parsing dynamic configuration file '0'. However I am able to change the shortcut location for all other applications except the above 2. I've tried redownloading the files using the ODT and also changing the version number (so far I've
    tried both the 15.0.4631.1002 and 15.0.4659.1001 with the same result).
    As all I'm interested in so far is having a package which contains Visio and Project I've tried following the article to exclude all the other Office elements:
    http://technet.microsoft.com/library/jj219426(v=office.15).aspx#BKMK_ExcludeAppElement. However the package looks to be the same and when I load it into the management console all the options and elements to Office 2013 are available like they were before
    when I hadn't set the exclude tags so I'm not sure whether the ExcludeApp parameters actually work correctly.
    This then brings me onto the 3rd issue I've experienced. I have a group for the Visio users and I've set custom security for them to have Visio delivered to them but not Project and then a seperate group for just Project users who will have Project delivered
    to them but not have Visio. When testing this sometimes seems to work but other times it seems to trip out and a user just in the Project or Visio group will get all of the Office 2013 applications and under the default location of Microsoft Office 2013. When
    trying to spot correlation with this it appears random and can happen to any user on any device. We have sequenced a few applications ourselves where different parts are needed for different users and we have successfully managed this using different security
    groups for different applications, just as I'm trying here with Office 2013.
    Has anyone else experienced the issue with the "did not contain well formed XML" as at the start of the post and how were you able to resolve this? Also has anyone any advice on how to troubleshoot the issue with the security seeming to trip out
    and publish all applications within a package to a user regardless of whether they are in the correct group or not?
    The management / publishing servers are 5.0.1224.0 which is SP1 HF4 and the clients are on SP2 HF5.
    Thanks

    Nicke,
    The config files are UTF-8. I did find the same article as yourself, however when searching for the value ‘TakeoverExtensionPointsFrom46=’ within either of the configuration.xml files that text isn’t found.
    No sinister reason not to share the file used, just it’s the same structure as referenced in the article:
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn745895(v=office.15).aspx. The only difference being that I’m using ProPlusVolume and I’ve set a version number (which is the October
    2014 update). I’ve even looked to follow the above example as closely as possible in just using the ExcludeApp ID of Access and InfoPath, just to try and prove the process. However I still get the usual full package. The version of the Click-to-Run setup.exe
    I’m using is 15.0.4623.1001, so later than the version specified at the end of that article which is 15.0.4619.1000. Where can I expect to see the elements excluded? Will it be when loading the package into the management console or would it just not appear
    on the machine when delivered?
    <Configuration>
      <Add SourcePath="C:\OfficeDeploymentToolV2" Version="15.0.4659.1001" OfficeClientEdition="32">
        <Product ID="ProPlusVolume">
          <Language ID="en-us" />
    <ExcludeApp ID="Access" />
    <ExcludeApp ID="InfoPath" />
        </Product>
      </Add>
    </Configuration>
    3). We’ve not used global publishing in our environment yet so I will try that. I’ve set both GlobalRefreshEnabled and GlobalRefreshOnLogon to True and when using the command Get-AppvPublishingServer on the client I’m testing with I can see this is pulled
    through correctly. I’ve also added the client name to the AD group used to grant access to the package and it is published. However nothing is pulling through onto the Client, so are there any steps I’ve missed or misinterpreted when looking to set this up?
    I guess the global publishing is there to keep in with licensing for Office being per device? On a slight aside, as Windows licensing is being changed to allow per user licensing
    http://www.zdnet.com/microsoft-to-make-per-user-windows-licensing-available-to-enterprise-customers-7000035401/ does anyone know if there are any plans to allow for Office / Project / Visio licenses to go per user as well? We’re a volume license customer
    rather than subscription based so I think a lot of the options to selectively deploy Visio and Project are excluded for us.
    Dan,
    Ok that explains why the security could be tripping out then and leading to this result. As above I’ll try with global publishing and see how I get on.
     From what I’ve read / watched  I think only one Office 2013 package can be published to a machine, so we would be unable to have a separate package for Visio and a separate package for Project and then attempt to deliver
    them both together. If a user wanted both Project and Visio then I guess we’d need to have a combined Project and Visio package to cover than scenario, but then 2 more separate Project and Visio packages for those who would only want either Project and Visio
    (I think).
    The scenario we’re looking at is to see whether we are able to deliver Project and / or Visio to different users through an AppV package and this will then cover users on XenApp or on fat clients. Only a small proportion of our
    users will need access to Project and / or Visio so therefore we’d only have a small amount of Project and Visio licenses.
    However from what I’ve tested up to this point and from what I’ve picked up from Forum posts / watched on TechEd sessions is that as publishing is Global and is unable to use different security groups for different elements of the
    suite, then using Office through AppV is only suitable if you will be delivering the whole suite (including Project and Visio) to all of your users. So in a scenario where you’d only want certain elements to be delivered to a handful of users then you’d need
    to keep with traditional ESD methods to have this installed onto fat clients and steer clear of XenApp. If wanting to install to XenApp then a lockdown tool like AppSense or AppLocker would also need to be brought into the equation.
    Is my understanding above correct or have I missed some options / methods?
    If the full Office package is always delivered but a company only has Office licenses and no Project and Visio licenses for all its users, how do they stop Project and Visio being delivered and being available? Or again if you have
    this use case is the AppV method one which will be unsuitable?
    Thanks

  • Error #2046: The loaded file did not have a valid signature in flex 4

    As part of our CI build, the ant script that builds the client side (flex 4) projects also runs a set of FlexUnit4 tests on the deployed project. Most of the tests work but a few fail with this error
    RSL
    http://local.foo.com/bar/com/blah/components/someComponent/framework_4.1.0.16076.swz failed to load.
    Error #2046: The loaded file did not have a valid signature.
    The build machine is running Ununtu 10.10 with Firefox 3.6 and Flashplayer 10.2. If I run  the exact same set of tasks, accessed from the same URL in windows everything passes with no problem. After some searching I did run across this thread: http://forums.adobe.com/message/2747415#2747415 but when I went looking for the libflashsupport.so file mentioned, the Ubuntu docs seemed to indicate that it was no longer needed.
    I'm at my wits end here. Is libflashsupport.so actually needed in Ubuntu 10.10 and if so where would I find it? If not does anyone know of another issue that could be responsible for this?

    hello,
    I have the same issue, Ubuntu 10.10, flashplayer 10.3rc1
    mxmlc SimplePrj.mxml -debug=true -benchmark=true --target-player=10 -output ../deploy/SimplePrj.swf
    mxlc verbose:
    Loading configuration file /home/.../flex-config.xml
    Initial setup: 79ms
    start loading swcs 9ms Running Total: 88ms
    Loaded 34 SWCs: 740ms
    precompile: 1062ms
    Required RSLs:
        http://fpdownload.adobe.com/pub/swz/flex/4.5.0.20967/framework_4.5.0.20967.swz with 1 failover.
        http://fpdownload.adobe.com/pub/swz/tlf/2.0.0.232/textLayout_2.0.0.232.swz with 1 failover.
        http://fpdownload.adobe.com/pub/swz/flex/4.5.0.20967/spark_4.5.0.20967.swz with 1 failover.
        http://fpdownload.adobe.com/pub/swz/flex/4.5.0.20967/sparkskins_4.5.0.20967.swz with 1 failover.
        http://fpdownload.adobe.com/pub/swz/flex/4.5.0.20967/mx_4.5.0.20967.swz with 1 failover.
    Files: 540 Time: 3380ms
    Linking... 27ms
    SWF Encoding... 18ms
    /.../SimplePrj/deploy/SimplePrj.swf (80059 bytes)
    postcompile: 45ms
    Total time: 4259ms
    Peak memory usage: 81 MB (Heap: 62, Non-Heap: 19)
    I had to copy the swz to deploy folder since failovers are not yet available.
    * accessing from windows machines it loads swz without complaints.
    Jaco

  • Error #2046: The loaded file did not have a valid signature.

    I have three different applications which suddenly stopped working with this error
    Error #2046: The loaded file did not have a valid signature.
    None of the sites has been touched in Months, I assumed they would keep working the way they had.
    I wonder how many other sites are experiencing this and how many PO'd customers there are out there??
    This is really bad business practice, what is causing it?
    Dan Pride
    Note: the three were developed around the same time, one domain went down for a few days and was then renewed????

    Daniel... have you found a solution to your problem?
    I am also having the same problem. I was googling with no avail, when I noticed you added this post just yesterday,
    so I am thinking that adobe has done something to the swz files hosted on thier servers.
    Can someone from Adobe confirm if anything was done to either swz files or the crossdomain files on their end?
    I am in the same boat as you... no changes on our side, but the application has suddenly stopped working.
    We were building against a beta build of flex 4 (4.0.0.10485)
    I wonder which sdk version you are using?
    Here is what I see through the debugger...
    Warning: Ignoring 'secure' attribute in policy file from http://fpdownload.adobe.com/pub/swz/crossdomain.xml. The 'secure' attribute is only permitted in HTTPS and socket policy files. See http://www.adobe.com/go/strict_policy_files for details.
    [SWF] C:\Inetpub\wwwdata\xxxxxxxxx_Application.swf - 847,661 bytes after decompression
    Error #2046: The loaded file did not have a valid signature.
    Failed to load RSL http://fpdownload.adobe.com/pub/swz/flex/4.0.0.10485/framework_4.0.0.10485.swz
    Failing over to RSL framework_4.0.0.10485.swz
    Error #2046: The loaded file did not have a valid signature.
    PS... I have tried multple PCs (XP, Vista, Server 2008) with different versions of flash player (10.0.45.2, 10.0.22.87)
    Any help appreciated.

  • Anyone know what is Error #2046: The loaded file did not have a valid signature

    can anyone help me solve this issue? when i try to run project or make swf file
    Error #2046: The loaded file did not have a valid signature
    show up. how do i get a valid signature? or it show up because it is a trial version?
    please help me!!

    Hi Ryan,
    Please see this recent post: http://forums.adobe.com/message/3277736#3277736
    Your best option is to open your project in the shipping version of Flash Catalyst CS5 and re-publish it.  Catalyst CS5 can open projects that were created with the beta 2 release (October 2009) or newer.
    If your project won't open, then it was probably created in an earlier beta/alpha version of Catalyst.  If you know how to write Flex code, with some work you can upgrade these old projects by hand: import the project into Flash Builder 4 and then resolve any problems you encounter with compiling and running the project.
    Sorry for the trouble -- hope this info helps,
    - Peter

  • Logic Pro 9- I saved a song- the audio files did not bounce and are nowhere to be found.  The song is still there, but the audio files are missing.  Any ideas?

    I have searched the computer by song name in the audio files.
    I have opened up media files and looked everywhere.
    I tried remapping where they would be saved and hoping they were updated.
    Any help finding where they are located would be great.  The song still loads when I open it, I just can't find the audio files!

    Have you tried using the built in Browser in LP?
    http://help.apple.com/logicpro/mac/10/#lgcpc788cc57
    Note: It works the same way in LP9 as in LPX

  • The Appcache file is not updated even if I change the version. any changes concerning version 34.0

    I have been working with the Appcache service in Firefox for the last 6 months and everything went fine. until the last update 34.0 . even if I change the version of the .Appcache file it seems that the browser doesn't take it into consideration.
    the same code snippet work on IE and Chrome.
    is there something I should be aware of since the last update.
    thanks for your help :)

    Chris, I'm embarrased I hadn't thought of trying your tip.  It worked like a charm.  Thanks.

  • Need help with PAGES in the document file will not open

    Hi if anyone can help me I woud appreciate it-
    I downlaoded awhile back the new software X and eveything was fine till I tried to open some documents (pages) and it will NOT OPEN a window pops up a newer version is available but when I go in there are NO UPDATES and I really do not think I need to buy a newer version do I?
    Please Help

    When you installed the latest version of Pages (and other iWork apps), the older versions were saved in a folder named "iWorks '09" in the Applications folder. You're trying to open a document that was saved in Pages 5 or in Pages for iOS using the older version of Pages. What you probably need to do is remove the Dock icon and drag Pages 5 into the Dock.

  • .mov files did not transfer with iphoto pics

    I recently used my macbook on a long trip and used it to capture the many pictures and videos I took with my digital camera. Once back, I copied (or so I thought) the contents from the macbook to my imac. However, though all the pictures (jpgs) transferred, the movie files did not. However, the thumbnails do show up on the imac but don't actually contain the movie (shows 00:00 as duration).
    I've verified that the movies still exist within the data folder (pictures/iphoto library/data) but unable to move these over back into iphoto on my imac so as to sync back up with the thumbnails. Please help.
    thanks,
    ~Dennis

    TD...
    Thanks for the response. Unfortunately, the only files that show up when I do file export..ORiginal are the existing pics in iPhoto....not the ones I had transferred before. The movie files do not show up....however, they are still somewhere in the computer as I can run spotlight and find them (it points to the Pictures/iPhoto Library/Data area.
    Again, when I originally copied over the files from laptop to desktop, the thumbnails can be seen ion the desktop within iphoto however, the actual movie content is not there.
    ~Dennis

  • HT201210 what does it mean when i get a message "my ipod could not be updated because the firmware file is not compatible"

    iPod version shown in iTunes as "4.3.4"  (not listed in the OS drop-down associated with setting up this post.  Appeared to download the update OK but as soon as it went to install it came up with "The iPod "xxxxx" could not be updated because the firmware file is not compatible"  Why and what do I do now?  I'm pretty sure it was trying to install 5.1.1

    - Are you updating clicking on the update button in iTunes?
    Try a reset. Nothing is lost.
    - Reset iPod touch: Hold down the On/Off button and the Home button at the same time for at
    least ten seconds, until the Apple logo appears.
    - Try deleting file and try again. It is located:
    IPSW file location for Mac and Windows

  • SQL 2008 R2 - Mirror sys.master_files data file size not updating

    Hi,
    I have an odd issue where the primary server is SQL 2008 R2 SP1 and the secondary is SQL 2008 R2 SP2. I have databases mirroring between these servers. We recently moved the log file on the secondary to a different drive. The file sizes match and are updating
    exactly the same between both servers. The mirror monitor shows the mirroring successful and everything is up to date. When we check the sys.master_files tables on the mirror, the size of the data file has not updated since moving the log file. Tried restarting
    SQL but not joy.
    Anyone have any ideas?
    Thanks
    Rob

    Hi,
    I would say you wait for some time it would get reflected I have seen this with sys.master_files they are updated late. Like when you delete heavy data, data would be gone but space captured by data would be  released slowly due to internal ghost operation
    cleaning and after this operation completes sys.master_files catalog is updated I guess this is what happening here as well , this is pure speculation. I will stick to this thread please look for a day and then update again
    Please mark this reply as answer if it solved your issue or vote as helpful if it helped so that other forum members can benefit from it.
    My TechNet Wiki Articles

  • I had to restore my iPad recently and in opening Pages again found that even though I synced my iPad and backed it up my files did not come over to the restored iPad. Is there any way of recouperating them? Thanks!

    I had to restore my iPad recently and in opening Pages again found that even though I synced my iPad and backed it up my files did not come over to the restored iPad. Is there any way of recouperating them? Thanks!

    working files aare not backed up as far as I know. You must either 1)"copy to itunes", then use itunes to save as... to your desktop machine. Or 2) use iCloud to keep the docs.
    I also learned this the hard way. No way i know of to get the working docs back.
    Jason

  • A sporadic compile error vbc : error BC31019: Unable to write to output file 'D:\Revit\Dev32\RevitAdditions\Source\..\Intermediate\ReleaseWin32\VBNETSnippets\VBNETSnippets.dll': The specified image file did not contain a resource section.

    Hi,
    This is developer from Autodesk. We get this compile error from time to time. This is a sporadic failure. We can't find any issue in our own project.
    vbc : error BC31019: Unable to write to output file 'D:\Revit\Dev32\RevitAdditions\Source\..\Intermediate\ReleaseWin32\VBNETSnippets\VBNETSnippets.dll': The specified image file did not contain a resource section.
    I find a help doc from the website to try some steps to solve this issue.
    Error ID: BC31019
    To correct this error
    Compile the program again to      see if the error recurs.
    If the error continues, save      your work and restart Visual Studio.
    If the error continues, restart      the computer.
    If the error recurs, reinstall      Visual Basic.
    If the error persists after      reinstallation, notify Microsoft Product Support Services.
    My question is what the root cause for this issue. Could you please give us some explanation where the issue should be,  VB compiler? .Net Framework?
    Visual Studio? Operating system?
    Thanks
    Wilson

    Hi hitzwx,
    Thank you for posting in MSDN forum.
    Since this forum is to discuss: Visual Studio WPF/SL Designer, Visual Studio Guidance Automation Toolkit, Developer Documentation and Help
    System, and Visual Studio Editor.
    Based on your issue, I am not sure what the root cause for this issue. But I suggest you can try some suggestions so that narrow down this issue.
    (1) I suggest you try to create a new simple VB project and then check this issue.
    (2) In addition, maybe you see the document about your issue. If possible, I suggest you can try these suggestions to troubleshooting this issue.
    https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/85s7w197.aspx
    >>Unable to write to output file 'D:\Revit\Dev32\RevitAdditions\Source\..\Intermediate\ReleaseWin32\VBNETSnippets\VBNETSnippets.dll': The specified image file did not contain a resource section.
    In addition, I suggest you can check if the specified image file in the output folder or you can try to click your image file in the Solution Explorer-> select the Copy to Output Directly properties->Copy always check this issue again.
    If you have any update message about your issue, please tell me.
    Best Regards,
    We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
    Click
    HERE to participate the survey.

  • HT1933 I bought six songs using my itunes gift card in February but I cannot play the songs or downlaod them to my ipod because I get an error saying the original file could not be found.  I have used the gift card previously with no issue.  How do I fix

    I bought six songs using my itunes gift card in February but I cannot play the songs or downlaod them to my ipod because I get an error saying the original file could not be found.  I have used the gift card previously with no issue.  How do I fix it?

    Have you moved or deleted those tracks on your computer (the gift card has got nothing to do with it) ?
    You might be able to re-download them via the Purchased link under Quick Links on the right-hand side of the iTunes store home page on your computer's iTunes (re-downloading isn't possible in all countries) - if those songs appear there then delete the entries from your iTunes library (where you are clicking on them to play them and gettinf the 'original file' error), and they should then get a cloud symbol against them for re-downloading.
    If they don't appear in that link then have you got them on, for example, an external drive ?

  • I tried playing a you tube video, but received a message prompt to download the latest version of Adobe Flash Player. The link to Adobe stated that there are issues with MAC OS X 10.7 and Flash Player 10.3. The new version did not download. Any Suggestion

    I tried playing a you tube video, but received a message prompt to download the latest version of Adobe Flash Player. The link to Adobe stated that there are issues with MAC OS X 10.7 and Flash Player 10.3. The new version did not download. Any Suggestion

    Hi Seattle
    From Adobe site only!
    flashplayer11_b1_install_mac_071311.dmg
    Works fine.
    Cheers Tomi

Maybe you are looking for