Site views differently on Remote Site

Using DW CS4
Ok, fairly new to DW as you will see... All images/scripts etc... have paths to my local folders with those files but when I publish it to the remote site, I view the source code and the paths still show the local path i.e. C:\Document & Sitings instead of a remote path and of course, the web page looks nothing like how I designed it.
How do I get that to change for all my web pages so my site views like it does on my local computer.  I can't seem to find how to change it to a remote path.
Thanks,
DT

deezturner wrote:
I've checked and can not locate how to change the properties to see the
working folder?  I know I'm probably over-looking it but again, I don't
use DW much.  Sorry!
Top Menu Bar:
SITE > MANAGE SITES > select your site from the list.
If there is nothing there, then you haen't declared a site definition  :-)  You need to select NEW and create a new one with it pointing to your working files.
All the site content resides under NWSTEST folder on the webserver.  The
source code shows the local path as you will see.
Yep, all the links are pointing to your hard drive...  you need to fix the site definition.
Defining a site helps Dreamweaver track and organize the files used in this site.
http://kb.adobe.com/selfservice/viewContent.do?externalId=tn_14028
Nadia
Adobe Community Expert : Dreamweaver
Unique CSS Templates | Tutorials | SEO Articles
http://www.DreamweaverResources.com
Web Design & Development
http://www.perrelink.com.au
http://twitter.com/nadiap

Similar Messages

  • Published files work on local site but not on remote site

    the flash4 published set of files, with a variety of skins tried, works well on the local drive, even when moved to a different folder structure. when index.html is opened on the remote web site, the browser (firefox3 and ie7) displays the player conrols and a rotating horizontal barber pole, green and black, but no flash video.some of the skins i've used are: SkinOverPlaySeekFullscreen.swf, nOverPlayStopSeekCaptionVol.swf and SkinUnderPlay.swf. all work locally but do not play the .flv file on the web site. no problem playing flv movies on the remote web site if the file set is created by dreamweaver.
    how should this flash newbee diagnose the problem? --david

    The source for the video seems to be hardcoded to your local drive.  You will need to change this to a relative path, or hardcode it to the server location.
    Here is the error my debugging player displayed:
    SecurityError: Error #2148: SWF file http://jdavidellis.com/channel19movies/wmv_medium.swf cannot access local resource C:\Documents and Settings\D\My Documents\Web Sites\channel19movies\flv_test_files_for_web_site_3nov09\512x288_15fps_221kbps_1min.flv. Only local-with-filesystem and trusted local SWF files may access local resources.
         at flash.net::NetStream/play()
         at fl.video::VideoPlayer/http://www.adobe.com/2007/flash/flvplayback/internal::_play()
         at fl.video::VideoPlayer/http://www.adobe.com/2007/flash/flvplayback/internal::_setUpStream()
         at fl.video::VideoPlayer/http://www.adobe.com/2007/flash/flvplayback/internal::_load()
         at fl.video::VideoPlayer/load()
         at fl.video::FLVPlayback/doContentPathConnect()

  • Type Kit Fonts view differently on remote server

    I have small problem with the way type-kit fonts are being displayed once the pages using thenm are uploaded to remote server. They are basically viewing much heavier when uploaded to remote server which is causing problems with layout.
    Can anyone shed any light on to why this happens and is there a FIX?
    Any help is appreciated!
    Attached is a screen shot to show the difference.

    Hi Steve,
    I'm sorry you ran into trouble here. This is most likely a CSS or browser issue. I'd be happy to take a look. Could you send an email to: [email protected] with the url for this live page?
    I can take a look and see what's going on. Have a great weekend.
    Cheers,
    Benjamin

  • How to restore a remote site after a crash?

    I have read the site management FAQ and it mentions to restore your files you can go to your remote site and load back to your local site.
    Could anyone offer some help to my situation?
    I suffered a hard drive failure, I'm running windows xp, dwcs4 and the site is hosted. I have reinstalled windows and dw. The site was created as per all the tutorials and I managed to save a copy of the site folder but not as per the saving instructions in the FAQ. I just have a root folder with all the pages in.
    Could someone point me to a tutorial or how to?
    Thanks in advance
    Jim

    "I managed to save a copy of the site folder but not as per the saving instructions in the FAQ. I just have a root folder with all the pages in."
    You lost me here. Not sure what you mean.
    Create a new site definition for local and remote sites, connect to your remote site then click Get. That's all you need to do.

  • Why is the body area of my site a different size in the preview view than than in the design view?

    Why is the body area of my site a different size in the preview view than than in the design view?

    Why is the body area of my site a different size in the preview view than than in the design view?

  • Remote Site malfunction after moving to different server

    We had to move the remote site from one server to another by backing up the current remote site and restoring it on another server. Since then the users on that remote site are unable to receive notifications. The tickets are coming over just fine. On the central site under the remote sites and agents setting page, when you click on the site name it is still trying to go to the old server but according to the remote site everything is communicating properly. I need to do one of two things:1. Edit the central site so that the link points to the correct location under the remote site setting page2. Delete the remote site on the central server and re-establish the connection from the remote site. I'm not sure what that will do to the data so I was hesitant to do this one.Does anyone know how to accomplish the first option or should I just...
    This topic first appeared in the Spiceworks Community

    Please share what task fails, profile your network speed, and the new environment specs.
    Also depends on SSIS version you can have (in 2012 and above) the operational reports that indicate each tasks speed, otherwise add more logging.
    On the surface, the issue is with the network speed or how busy the new machines are.
    PS: you shared too few details to be of more help
    Arthur
    MyBlog
    Twitter

  • File does not exist on remote site, yet it does

    I have been trying to understand how Dreamweaver handles remote files in CS5.
    My server is setup as a remote server and a test server.
    I open the remote file, it offers to get dependencies, so I click yes.
    I click on Live view, then it tries to show me the following url
    http://my_site.com/public_html/path/to/my/file/file.php
    It should not put public_html in the path, and I did not specify this in my site setup. My root setting is /.
    Anyway, If I change the url manually, then it shows correctly. Then it offers to discover dunamically linked files, which I agree to.
    Now it tells me that 'Dynamically-related files could not be resolved because the site definition is not correct for this server'
    If I try to open one of the files that it has discovered, I am told that it is not on the disk, so would I like to 'get it', so I agree.
    Finally, I am told that 'Get operation failed since linked-file.php does not exist on remote site'
    I suspect that this is all to do with my site definition, but I fiddled with the settings and can't resolve this. I think that the whole problem goes back to Dreamweaver's insistance on putting public_html in the path, but I can't stop it doing so.
    Any suggestions?
    Thanks
    ian

    Hi,
    Well, yes I did manage to fix the dynamically linked resources issue. As mentioned above, I did need to mention public_html in my Root Directory setting in server setup (silly of me).
    I had tried this at first, but it didn't work, as I had the server set as a test server and not a remote server, anyway, i now have it set as both and all is well.
    Except that, the first issue that mentioned is still with me: namely, dreamweaver mentions the public_html in the url path when on live view, which is not correct and I don't know where it is inferring this from. I can change it manually, but this doesn't seem right to me. Am I still missing a setting?
    In anwer to the questions:
    1) My setting (now) in the Root Directory setting in DW is: /public_html/
    2) My actual path on the server (that i mention in php scripts) is: /home/login_name/public_html//path/to/my/file/file.php
    [In the advanced settings of DW site setup on the Local Info page I have set Links relative to Document option, although it does not seem to make a difference when I change it to Site Root.]
    Any suggestions appreciated.
    Thanks
    Ian

  • The WSDL data cannot be retrieve from remote site

    I am a new guy learning web services with NetBeans 5.5 and meet some problem in retrieving wsdl data from remote site.
    I create a web service "WSTestServer" at Sun Application Server PE8.2 with real IP, say 111.110.11.10:8888, and there's a class "TestWS" with a method "getWS" to return a String. The server (or machine) name is ultra20. So, by following steps in NetBeans, I can get a wsdl file after generating the web service and it can be viewed at
    http://111.110.11.10:8888/WSTestServer/TestWS?WSDL
    Then, I create a web service client at the same machine, it is available to test this method by clicking Web Service Reference item in NetBeans and select "getWS" method to get that String.
    However, when I create a web service client at remote site, it doesn't work and show exception message like
    cannot find domain http://ultra20:8888/WSTestServer/TestWS....
    I go back to check wsdl file, at the last line, it prints like
    <soap:address location="http://ultra20:8888/WSTestServer/TestWS".....
    If I test this case in LAN, e.g., the server IP becomes 192.168.1.2 and client IP is 192.168.1.3, then it works since machine name can be recognized within the same local area network. I try to revise the wsdl file above to replace machine name as real IP, but it is automatically changed back with machine name while deploying and copy the revised one as xxx.wsdl__orig.
    Should I do additional configuration setup for server site? Such as, registering a domain name like aaa.bbb.edu instead of 111.110.11.10?
    Any comment and help for this subject is appreciated!!
    Thank you so much!

    Works as designed,from documentation:
    The database also retrieves all triggers and constraints defined on the table except for referential integrity constraints that reference other tables.
    The retrieved indexes, triggers, and constraints have recycle bin names. Therefore it is advisable to query the USER_RECYCLEBIN view before issuing a FLASHBACK TABLE ... TO BEFORE DROP statement so that you can rename the retrieved triggers and constraints to more usable names.
    For details see the FLASHBACK TABLE command description for your unknown database version.
    Werner

  • One WLC for Headquarter and Remote Site

    Hi
    I have a question about the WLC remote deployment.
    We have the following design at the moment:
    Headquarter
    - Network 192.168.49.0 /24
    - WLC 4402 Version 4.2.61.0
    -- 3 x LAP1252
    -- Layer 3 LWAPP
    -- SSID wep
    -- SSID wpa
    - Windows PDC with Active Directory, DHCP Server and local Data Storage
    - ACS Version 3.2 for TACACS and RADIUS authentication --> External DB to Active Directory
    Remote Site
    - Network 192.168.50.0 /24
    - 2 x LAP1252
    -- SSID wep
    -- SSID wpa
    - Windows PDC with Active Directory, DHCP Server and local Data Storage
    - ACS Version 3.2 for TACACS and RADIUS authentication --> External DB to Active Directory
    Connection between Headquarter and Remote Site
    - 2 Mbit ADSL
    The problem is, that the wireless clients on the remote site get an ip address out of the headquarter DHCP Range 192.168.49.0 /24. The users on the remote site
    most of the time only use the local data server in the remote office. With the actual design the hole traffic is switched over the 2 Mbit ADSL connection the the
    WLC in the headquarter and back to the remote site. That works but it is not that performant.
    The problem could be solved with HREAP, but what I think is, that it is not possible to have the same SSID at headquarter and remote site with different VLANs.
    How can I achieve, that the clients on the remote site connect to the same SSID (wep or wpa), get an ip address from the remote site DHCP server (192.168.50.0)
    and the traffic is switched localy.
    I hope you understand what the problem is.
    Thanks in advance for your help!

    Yes, putting the remote AP's in HREAP mode will allow the same WLANs to be available on the AP's but the traffic would be locally switched at the AP instead of being tunneled back to the controller. After you put the AP in HREAP mode you then would configure which VLAN you want traffic for each WLAN to be dumped onto for that AP.

  • Remote site redundancy IPSEC VPN between 2911 and ASA

    We already have IPSEC VPN connectivity established between sites but would like to introduce some resilience/redundancy at a remote site.
    Site A has an ASA with one internet circuit.
    Site B has a Cisco 2911 with one internet circuit and we have established site-to-site IPSEC VPN connectivity between the 2911 and the ASA.
    Prior to getting the new internet circuit, Site B had a Cisco 877 with an ADSL line which are still available but aren’t currently in use.
    The internet circuit at Site B has dropped a few times recently so we would like to make use of the ADSL circuit (and potentially the 877 router too) as a backup.
    What is the best way of achieving this?
    We thought about running HSRP between the 877 and 2911 routers at Site B and, in the event of a failure of the router or internet circuit, traffic would failover to the 877 and ADSL.
    However, how would Site A detect the failure? Can we simply rely on Dead Peer Detection and list the public IP address of the internet circuit at Site B first with the public IP address used on the ADSL line second in the list on the ASA? What would happen in a failover scenario and, just as important, when service was restored – I’m not sure DPD would handle that aspect correctly?
    I’ve read briefly elsewhere that GRE might be best to use in this scenario – but I can’t use GRE on the ASA. I have an L3 switch behind the ASA which I may be able to make use of? But I don’t want to disrupt the existing IPSEC VPN connectivity already established between the ASA and the 2911.   Can I keep IPSEC between the ASA and 2911 but then run GRE between the L3 switch and the 2911? If so, how would this best be achieved?  And how could I also introduce the 877 and ADSL line into things to achieve the neccessary redundancy?
    Any help/advice would be appreciated!

    Hello,
    I don't think GRE tunnel that you could set up on the switch  behind ASA would be really helpfull. Still site-2-site tunnel you want  to establish between ASA and some routers, but still it is ASA which needs to make decision about which peer to connect to.
    Possible solution would be to do HSRP between both routers on LAN side and with two independent tunnels/crypto maps (one on each of them). On ASA you would need to set up two hosts in set peer. Problem of this solution is that if one router at side B is going to go down and second ADSL line will take over ASA will not do preempt after you main Internet connection is up again. This would happen after ADSL Internet connection will be down.
    Solution to that would be to assign two different public IP addressess on two different interfaces of ASA. Then you attach two crypto maps to both interfaces and by using sla monitor (let's say icmp to main router, if it does not respond then you change routing for remote LAN to second interface) you are selecting which crypto map (with one peer this time) should be used.
    I hope what I wrote makes some sense.

  • Best Practices for Setting up a Windows 2012 R2 STD Domain Controller in a Remote Site

    So I'm looking for an article or writeup similar to the "Adding Domain Controllers in Remote Sites" TechNet article but for Windows Server 2012 STD R2.  Here is my scenario:
    1.  I want to setup the domain controller at Site A where the primary domain controller is located.  The primary domain controller is Windows Server 2008 R2. 
    2.  Once the DC is setup I plan on leaving it on our network for a few days before shipping it to remote Site B for installation
    Other key items:
    1.  The remote Site B will have a different IP range than Site A but will be connected to Site A via a single VPN tunnel.  All the DCs that replicate with each other are on the same domain. 
    2.  The 2012 DC that I setup for Site B (same domain in same forest) will be a DHCP, DNS, and WSUS server all replicating to the primary DC at Site A
    Questions:
    1.  What items can I setup while it's at Site A without effecting or conflicting with the existing network and domain controller?  Can I setup a scope once the DHCP role is added? 
    2.  All of our DCs replicate through Sites and Services, do I have to manually add this to our primary DC for the new DC going to remote Site B?  Or when does this happen automatically when I promote the DC? 
    All and all I'm just looking for a list of Best Practices for 2012 or a Step by Step Guide.  Any help would be appreciated. 

    Hi,
    Thanks for your posting.
    When you install AD DS in the hub or staging site, disconnect the installed domain controller, and then ship the computer to the remote site, you are disconnecting a viable domain controller from the replication topology.
    For more and detail information, please refer to:
    Best Practices for Adding Domain Controllers in Remote Sites
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc794962(v=ws.10).aspx
    Regards.
    Vivian Wang

  • Best Practice for SRST deployment at a remote site

    What is the best practice for a SRST deployment at a remote site? Should a separate router such as a 3800 series be deployed for telephony in addition to another router to be deployed for Data? Is there a need for 2 different devices?

    Hi Brian,
    This is typically done all on one ISR Router at the remote site :)There are two flavors of SRST. Here is the feature comparison;
    SRST Fallback
    This feature enables routers to provide call-handling support for Cisco Unified IP phones if they lose connection to remote primary, secondary, or tertiary Cisco Unified Communications Manager installations or if the WAN connection is down. When Cisco Unified SRST functionality is provided by Cisco Unified CME, provisioning of phones is automatic and most Cisco Unified CME features are available to the phones during periods of fallback, including hunt-groups, call park and access to Cisco Unity voice messaging services using SCCP protocol. The benefit is that Cisco Unified Communications Manager users will gain access to more features during fallback ****without any additional licensing costs.
    Comparison of Cisco Unified SRST and
    Cisco Unified CME in SRST Fallback Mode
    Cisco Unified CME in SRST Fallback Mode
    • First supported with Cisco Unified CME 4.0: Cisco IOS Software 12.4(9)T
    • IP phones re-home to Cisco Unified CME if Cisco Unified Communications Manager fails. CME in SRST allows IP phones to access some advanced Cisco Unified CME telephony features not supported in traditional SRST
    • Support for up to 240 phones
    • No support for Cisco VG248 48-Port Analog Phone Gateway registration during fallback
    • Lack of support for alias command
    • Support for Cisco Unity® unified messaging at remote sites (Distributed Exchange or Domino)
    • Support for features such as Pickup Groups, Hunt Groups, Basic Automatic Call Distributor (BACD), Call Park, softkey templates, and paging
    • Support for Cisco IP Communicator 2.0 with Cisco Unified Video Advantage 2.0 on same computer
    • No support for secure voice in SRST mode
    • More complex configuration required
    • Support for digital signal processor (DSP)-based hardware conferencing
    • E-911 support with per-phone emergency response location (ERL) assignment for IP phones (Cisco Unified CME 4.1 only)
    Cisco Unified SRST
    • Supported since Cisco Unified SRST 2.0 with Cisco IOS Software 12.2(8)T5
    • IP phones re-home to SRST router if Cisco Unified Communications Manager fails. SRST allows IP phones to have basic telephony features
    • Support for up to 720 phones
    • Support for Cisco VG248 registration during fallback
    • Support for alias command
    • Lack of support for features such as Pickup Groups, Hunt Groups, Call Park, and BACD
    • No support for Cisco IP Communicator 2.0 with Cisco Unified Video Advantage 2.0
    • Support for secure voice during SRST fallback
    • Simple, one-time configuration for SRST fallback service
    • No per-phone emergency response location (ERL) assignment for SCCP Phones (E911 is a new feature supported in SRST 4.1)
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/voicesw/ps6788/vcallcon/ps2169/prod_qas0900aecd8028d113.html
    These SRST hardware based restrictions are very similar to the number of supported phones with CME. Here is the actual breakdown;
    Cisco 880 SRST Series Integrated Services Router
    Up to 4 phones
    Cisco 1861 Integrated Services Router
    Up to 8 phones
    Cisco 2801 Integrated Services Router
    Up to 25 phones
    Cisco 2811 Integrated Services Router
    Up to 35 phones
    Cisco 2821 Integrated Services Router
    Up to 50 phones
    Cisco 2851 Integrated Services Router
    Up to 100 phones
    Cisco 3825 Integrated Services Router
    Up to 350 phones
    Cisco Catalyst® 6500 Series Communications Media Module (CMM)
    Up to 480 phones
    Cisco 3845 Integrated Services Router
    Up to 730 phones
    *The number of phones supported by SRST have been changed to multiples of 5 starting with Cisco IOS Software Release 12.4(15)T3.
    From this excellent doc;
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/voicesw/ps6788/vcallcon/ps2169/data_sheet_c78-485221.html
    Hope this helps!
    Rob

  • How do I create a hyperlink from a tablet view to a desktop view in another muse site.

    How do I create a hyperlink from a tablet view to a desktop view in another muse site.
    The page keeps redirecting to a table view in the 2nd site.  There is no tablet view set up.

    Here's a similar thread that should clarify most of your doubts regarding linking pages between different layouts.
    http://forums.adobe.com/message/5147694
    Thanks,
    Vinayak

  • Connection from remote sites (Frame Relay WAN) to AS/400 dissapears

    Hello,
    We have the following problem appearing in our environment:
    All connections from remote sites dissapears unexpected from AS/400. After 2-3 minutes remote users get normal connectivity again.
    The environment is the the following:
    Frame Relay/ATM WAN (Frame Relay on remote sites and ATM in datacenter) comes to Cisco 7204VXR router which connected to LAN switch with 10/100/1000 ports. AS/400 with Fast Ethernet interface also connected to the similar LAN switch. CEF is enabled on the router, IOS version 12.4.3a. We have ETHSTD *ALL parameter set on AS/400. Remote users uses TCP/IP and Telnet but there are a number of 5494 controllers wich uses SNA.
    We got the problem for the first time after we enabled CEF on the router.
    I suspect that the cause of problem is Ethernet frames of different standards due to ETHSTD *ALL, but can neither reproduce the problem nor understand why it behaves so.
    Have anybody had similar problem?
    I would be very thanksfull if somebody can help me to solve it.
    Thank you in advance.
    //Mikhail Galiulin

    Hi Martin,
    Cisco 7200 itself can access AS/400 as well as all other hosts in the same with AS/400 LAN. There is no any outage in communications which goes to another LAN segment via Netscreen firewall while the communication via Cisco is down. Only those hosts which connected via Cisco are experiencing the problem. I can not say where the traceroute from AS/400 stucks (there are other people who maintain the machine and they never could catch the exact moment of outage).
    To turn off CEF I treat as the last option actually and unfortunatelly there is no guarantee that software upgrade will help (we have 12.4.3a now).
    So first of all I'm trying to understan WHY it happens because I can not see any systematics in the problem appearance. It can happen 3 times under 2 days and then dissapear for 1-2 months...
    //Mikhail Galiulin

  • Redundant Controller at a remote site

    We are implementing a number of WLCs at different sites that are connected by a WAN (site-to-site links). I'd like to use the WLC at site A as the backup WLC for site B and that at site B as the backup for site A.
    I've reviewed the documents that I can find on Cisco and the threads in this forum, but haven't found a definitive guide yet - maybe I haven't recognised it.
    Can anyone point me in the right direction or provide configuration advice?
    Thanks in advance

    The only issues with doing that is the fact that the ap's at remote A will obtain the configurations from remote B when wlc A fails. So that means that the users will associate to an ssid and be tunneled back to the other remote site and access the network from there. If this doesn't work for you then maybe having redundant wlc's at each remote site is a better option. One other thing is to configure the ap's in h-reap mode and have all the wlc's centrally located.

Maybe you are looking for