Sizing the iFrame in iWeb
Hi,
Do anyone using iFrame to embed a Webpage into your page?
<IFRAME SRC = "http://artotems.com/default.aspx" WIDTH="260px" HEIGHT="425px" FRAMEBORDER="0" --if "0" no border, otherwise "1" with border MARGINWIDTH ="0px" MARGINHEIGHT="0px" SCROLLING="no" --"no" no scrolling bar, "yes" show always, "auto" showed when need > Your browser does not support IFRAME </IFRAME>
I use the above code to make it done.but i found that i can't resize it.means,i wish to make the page that i wish to embed into my page Scale Down to a smaller size instead of whole page of it!!The Width and Height fo the iFrame provided was the size of the Frame/Box but the size of the embed page still remain that size (Huge)...what can i do to make it smaller?
i hope you understand my question!
As far as I know there's no way to squeeze/resize the source page down to fit the size of the snippet you set up.
Similar Messages
-
I've Made the Switch (from iWeb) & Lived to Tell About It.
I've gotten a lot of help and useful information from this forum over the years and I will certainly miss it. I've just completed a 2 month transition where I've migrated my site from iWeb/Mobile Me to a new site made in RapidWeaver and hosted by Host Excellence. I figured I'd write a little (or a lot) about my experience, to give some others an idea of what they've got to look forward too. Hopefully it will arm you with some things to do and look out for. While I am describing RapidWeaver here, a lot of this process will be the same no matter what new software you use. I started off being pretty happy with what I had going in iWeb and not being thrilled at all about making the switch. Now I am so glad I made the switch and I am far happier about the new site than I was with the old one. BTW: the new sites address is: http://grillinsmokin.net . Feel free to visit. I think you'll quickly notice some things you simple can't do in iWeb. This isn't a knock against iWeb. I was very happy with iWeb and had no plans to switch. Where it hasn't been developed actively for four years now, it has been left behind somewhat.
To begin at the beginning: I've had a site made with iWeb since January of 2006 called Grillin' & Smokin' that combined my love of outdoor cooking and photography. Over the years it had grown rather large, with 375 photo entry pages and 230 blog pages. The Domain file was around 1.4 GB. This was not something I ever wanted to have to recreate from scratch. However losing MobileMe as a host was taking away Value Added features like the Hit Counter, Slide Show, Blog Comments, Blog Search etc. The handwriting is on the wall for iWeb too. I might have gone on using iWeb, but between losing key features and the fact iWeb was starting to show it's age, it was time for me to move on. Just before the iCloud announcement this Spring, I began researching website building software. I looked at their features, working methodology, themes, plug-ins and extensions. I download trial versions of the software where it was available as well as some of the themes or plugins I might be using. I gotta tell you, at first I was very frustrated and upset, because I was not finding anything that had the ease of use of iWeb and looked like it was going to be able to recreate the appearance of my original site. It appeared to be a series of compromises. I'd like the features of one package but I hated the themes available for that software. Another looked promising but isn't being upgraded regularly. My biggest frustration was some of the iWeb page types just don't exist in other packages. For example the Album Pages where multiple Photo Pages can be grouped and displayed, don't have a direct equivalent in any other package I saw. As part of my discovery process I read reviews of the various packages, including head to head comparisons of some of them. I also visited their discussion forums. After doing this for 3 weeks I "settled" on RapidWeaver. It was under active development; had a thriving developer community turning out a wide variety of add ons, plug-ins and themes; had an active user community & had lots of help resources available. The web pages it produced were standards compliant and you could get nice effects without resorting to Flash. I think the biggest selling point was all of the add-ons-kind of the same advantage the iPhone has with it's App Store.
Once I bought RapidWeaver & a 3rd Party theme, I tried the demo versions of some of the plug-ins and made sample versions of my page types from iWeb in RapidWeaver. I wanted to have a process in place, before I started mass production on the site. You really do need to do some of this homework in advance to avoid unpleasant surprises. The biggest minus I'd turned up about RapidWeaver (RW from this point on) is it didn't handle big sites well at all. The equivalent of the iWeb Domain file is the RapidWeaver Sandwich file or RWSW file. Once the RWSW file reaches 100MB or so you can get crashes or hangs uploading your site. Now 100 MB doesn't sound like much particularly when I was talking about a 1.4GB iWeb Domain File for my site, but RW doesn't include the photos in the RWSW file. Still I knew I was going to have to divide my site across several RWSW files. Initially the plan was to divide it into 3 sites: The main landing pages was one RWSW file and is the site reached by the url for the site. I was going to have a second RWSW file for my blogs and a third for my photos. Ultimately I ended up dividing the photos into 3 RWSW files. These extra files are hosted on sub-domians whose name goes in front of the main domain (http://sub-domain.main-domain.com). This meant some extra setup for me with my web-host, although they made the setup for the 4 sub-domains very easy and they were free. If you have a huge site and will need to split it, you'll want to check with your prospective web host if they charge extra for hosting additional sub-domains. For small iWebs sites this is not an issue-you have one RWSW file and one web address, just like you do now. My having sub-domains also meant more work linking files together across sites. RapidWeaver has something called an Offsite Page which helped with some of this, but having to split my sites up was the biggest PITA for me about the whole process. But knowing about this going in was better than finding out at the end when I tried to upload a single massive site. If you have a small site, the setup for uploading it is as straight forward as iWeb. RW has a built in FTP uploader or you can publish to file and use an FTP client like CyberDuck.
Once I had my site organization in place and had experimented with best practices for recreating each iWeb page type in RW, it was time to begin. I've gotta tell you when I started out I was not a happy camper. I liked the iWeb way of doing things about 70 percent of the time vs 30 percent for RW. At the end of the first week I told myself I have to move on and give up on the past. I was no longer going to be using iWeb and the sooner I embraced the RW way of doing things, the better off I'd be. At this early point it was still hard to see down the road to the end results. No matter what new package you buy, you should try to go with the flow and learn a new way of working. You'll be happier and less frustrated in the end. In my case after having gone through the entire process now, I've ended up changing my opinion. Now that I've gone through the entire process, I like the RapidWeaver way of doing things about 95 percent of the time and 5% for iWeb. That 5 percent is mostly the large site issue I've described. As I began working I was able to reuse much of the text from my iWeb blog in RW. I did have to paste it in as unformatted and reformat it in RW. My pictures were well organized in Aperture which also helped speed the process. One of the things I did is automate some of the tedious repetitious tasks. I created Quickeys macros to do things for me when ever possible. For example I could go to a particular photo page in iWeb and select the first caption. I would then trigger a macro that asked how many captions are on this page. It would then select the caption in iWeb, copy it, switch to RW and paste it in place and repeat XX times. If you know Quickeys or Applescript (I am guessing) there are plenty of opportunities to put it to good use.
RW present a different way of working than you are used to in iWeb and you'll just need to get used to it. What I am describing here would be true of any of the other packages I looked at too. First off it isn't WYSIWYG while you are editing. You are working with fairly basic looking text with few clues as to what the real page looks like. You switch to a preview mode to see what the page looks like in a browser. At first blush iWeb seems to win here. But what I soon realized is RW allows you to mix regular text and pictures together with html snippets right in the same text box. This makes adding counters or badges easy. Plus you can use HTML formatting for things like Titles occurring through your page. Instead of increasing the font size, making the text bold and changing its color, you can simply say this is Heading style 2 or 5 and this happens automatically per the predefined style. Better yet if you change a style everything on that one page or the entire site (your choice) inherits that change. So by working in a non-WYSIWYG mode you gain some long term. advantages over how iWeb works. The same is true with positioning. In iWeb it is fast and easy to place things on a page right down to the pixel. RW just doesn't give you that type of precision and next to splitting my site, layout was my biggest frustration with RW. At least to start. But there is a good reason for this "lack of precision" that may not be apparent until you view the site in a browser. When iWeb came out, you really didn't zoom your browser. iWeb uses Absolute Positioning where it uses anchored boxes for everything, whereas RW uses Relative Positioning. Objects with anchored text or picture boxes like iWeb start having problems if you zoom in or out more than one step. Text starts over flowing other text because the text boxes are anchored by one point. Pages just start looking scary if you try to zoom in or out too much. RW is looking at items relative positions and their relationships with one another. So initially you aren't placing the objects in the same way, it is more like eyeballing things in a way. But when viewed in a web browser you can zoom in or out to your heart's content. So what seems at first like a big disadvantage at first for RW, is actually a HUGE advantage.
This is why you need to go with the flow and try to embrace the new way of working. I mentioned earlier that I wasn't able to find a page type that was equivalent to the iWeb album page. I was able to use a very flexible plug-in for RW called stacks, which allows you to create various single and multi-column or multi-row layouts using empty stacks. You then populate the empty stacks with content, pictures text etc. These pages were not like iWeb albums where you nest the Photo Album Pages in the Album page and they create a skimmable preview and an automatic link to the album. Once I actually started making these new "Album" Pages in RW I realized I was gaining as much or more than I was loosing. The skimmable preview pictures was eyecandy I could live without. Nice touch, not essential. I never liked the way the preview picture shown on the Album page was the first photo in the Photo album. You couldn't change this. Now that I am placing my own photo on the Album page, I could use any picture and make it any size I wanted too. In iWeb the Album Caption was the name of the Photo Page. If this name was too long the caption didn't go to a second line, it got cut off. Any link in RW can have a description added to the link which is what you see in the yellow box when you hover your mouse over the item being linked. I used to hide text boxes links under the pictures on the Albums page for SEO and navigation help. So yes now I have to manually link the Album picture to the Photo Page, but I am no longer creating a hidden text box with a link that I have to remember to move when I add pages to the album. So once again my first impression was wrong. Advantage RW.
Another advantage to RW is any page type can have a sidebar. You can easily add favicons and site logos. You can easily add metadata to any page and customized the names of the path to your pages. The Themes can be more powerful and customizable too. About one week into the process I was begining to really go with the flow and see this new way of working had far more advantages for me than disadvantages.
By the time I finished my new RW site, my iWeb site was looking tired and dated. My biggest and most pleasant surprises were saved until the end. Any kind of SEO was a PITA with iWeb. You had to embed snippets on each page with a code from HaloScan or Google Analytics. Problem was, iWeb erased any such HTML code while you were uploading. So you then had to use a regular expression in the text box ("HaloScan goes here"), upload your site and replace the regular expression with the actual code using a 3rd party tool. Oh and don't do that on any blog page where you are using the built in Apple commenting system because the comments will disappear. I also had problems where the new comment badge would not show up for weeks or months after a comment was made. It was getting so the things I had to do AFTER I uploaded my site to MobileMe were taking longer than uploading the site. Once the site was recreated, it was time to add blog comments, a guestbook, a contact form, Google Analytics, and publish a site map. In my iWeb-influenced mind, I was saving the fussy PITA things for last. I was dead wrong. Unlike what you go through with iWeb, it couldn't have been been easier in RW:
-Blog Comments: Set up an account with the provider. Then I had to go into the page setup in RW for my blog page and click on a popup menu of comment providers & select Discus. If your provider isn't listed you paste some HTML code from the provider into a dialogue box provided by RW for the blog page. In my case it was simpler, just set Discus in the popup menu. Now instead of the iWeb badge showing me new posts (and only when it was in the mood), I now get an email.
-Google Analytics: Set up an account with Google. Go to the Stats area in the RW side bar, click on Configure, paste in your code from Google and you are good to go. You can monitor your Google analytics stats right from within RapidWeaver. (Also works this way for GoSquared Live Stats).
-Guestbook: Same as iWeb. You add a page with an HTML snippet from your Guestbook provider in an iFrame.
-Contact Form: This is a RW page type which masks your email address from the spambots by transferring the information to an invisible and inaccessible page within your site. This page then emails you the information.
-Full Site Search: This doesn't exist in iWeb. You can search your blogs right now, but this is one of the features you lose when MobileMe shuts down. By adding an inexpensive Plug in called RapidSearch Pro I enable full site search. You set up a MySQL server for your site. Host Excellence walked me through the 4-Step Process via a well written Help File. You then control what pages are indexed via your sitemap.xml file. You let RapidSearch Pro index your site and you are good to go.
-SiteMap: There is a simple SiteMap generation feature built into RW 5. There are third party tools for doing this for iWeb. I purchased an inexpensive RW plug in called SiteMap plus that not only generates the sitemap.xml file, it allows you to customize what pages get searched and at what frequency. This ties into what is searched via RapidSearch Pro. This plug-in also generates a visible and customizable sitemap page to help your site's users find their way around. Another bonus of being hosted off Mobile Me is when I went to add my sites to my Google account they had already been indexed. It seemed like they never crawled MobileMe unless you told them you wanted them to look at your site.
Link Checking: This doesn't exist in iWeb. I bought another inexpensive plug-in called Link Inspector for RW. It checks all of your internal and external links and generates a report showing the status of all links. This was just what the doctor ordered for my large site. I will run it periodically to make sure external links are still working and that I haven't broken any internal links.
My site was pretty much wrapped up on Monday August 8th. I just had to add in Blog Comments, Google Analytics, the Guestbook, Full Site Search and the Site Map. I figured I would go public on Tuesday or Wednesday. To my great pleasure these 5 items took all of 2 hours to get set up and working. This was a nice touch after 2 months of hard work.
So there you have it. This is the process I went through converting my site over to RapidWeaver. Your mileage may vary. I am not pushing RapidWeaver for everyone. You have to find what program is the right fit for you. You may find staying with iWeb on a new host is the right fit for you. You need to decide if you can live with the features you lose once you aren't hosted on Mobile Me. For me there was great pain, but in the end there was a lot of gain too. I do like my new site and I feel it will serve me well for years to come. Good luck to all of you in whatever path you choose. Lastly thanks one last time to the helpful folks around here
Jim
http://grillinsmokin.net
Message was edited by: Jim MahoneyThanks Roddy. I agree with your take on some of the other software you mentioned, at least from the perspective of having dabbled with demo versions of some of the others. I will add that with Sandvox I felt a little nervous about it. Kind of almost like the software was a "hobby" effort a la the first gen Apple TV.
I also agree with some of your points regarding RapidWeaver. But now that I've built my rather large (for a hobbyist site) website with it I will have to respectfully disagree about it being at the same level as iWeb, or as you put it: a sideways move. While iWeb can be made to do things it was never originally meant to do, there are many places it simply can't go that RapidWeaver can. I was often hitting the limits of what you could do in iWeb, whereas with RapidWeaver, with one exception, I didn't feel like I was running up against any limits yet. The exception is it's lack of ability to handle large sites well. That was almost the deal breaker for me. I find it unexplainable that a software package with all kinds of add-ons helping you make more ambitious sites, can't handle those same sites in a single file. This was almost a deal-breaker for me. For folks who have small to medium sized iWeb sites this isn't a concern. There are also ways to warehouse images on the server to keep file size down, but this gets more complex than many folks coming from iWeb would want to do. Me splitting my site up the way I did was more work than I wanted to do.I almost bagged the whole thing and was close to just taking the old site down.
Now if we were to fantasize for a minute I can think of a way where I could also say iWeb to RapiWeaver is a sideways move: While I don't think iWeb '09 is the equal to RapidWeaver 5, I'd bet that iWeb 11 or the oft rumored iWeb Pro might have been. I kept hoping that Apple would keep pushing the limits of what iWeb could do and add in some missing features and head down the HTML 5 road.
I will conditionally agree on your saying that the shopping list for RapidWeaver can be substantial. I will qualify that by saying: Depending on what you are doing with it, your shopping list for RapidWeaver can be substantial. With one exception, I do think the base package of RapidWeaver is fairly priced. I think the basic Stacks functionality and a few basic stacks should be part of RapidWeaver. The more esoteric stacks can be pay as you go. When iLife 11 was announced without a an update to iWeb, I did some preliminary pricing and I was rather discouraged at the total. This spring I got more serious about things and repriced RapidWeaver and add-ons. After trying out various themes and plug-ins, I was able to sharpen my pencil and reduce the cost of entry considerably. One of the things that helped is the theme I bought had a couple features built into it. It had a nice lightbox type slideshow for photo pages and animated banners/headers capabilities built in. This saved me the expense of several additional plug-ins. Also while I have a blog, I don't consider myself a blogger. I was able to use the built in blog page and I don't feel limited by it at all. Some of the other ad-ons I bought: such as the link checker, site wide search and a more sophisticated sitemap generator were items I added because I could tell I would want to keep the site going long term. Those 3 plug-ins did that a a low price. I didn't think they needed to be built in.
But everyone's mileage may vary. RapidWeaver or any other web design program isn't right for every iWeb user. It all depends on personal needs, abilities and budgets. I'm just glad I can get back to posting to the site and not recreating it.
Jim -
Where do I put in the iframe link and how?
Where do I put in the iframe link and how?
Thank you.You paste ALL custom code in a HTML Snippet.
iWeb doesn't care about your code and will happily publish your stuff, whether it works or not. You are 100% responsible.
Read this : Using the iWeb HTML Snippet
And here's an alternative to the <iframe> HTML element :
iWeb : iframe alternative in the HTML Snippet -
Is there a way of aligning the images in iweb photoalbums other than have them be a square?I have them at same height and resolution but htere is a default that shrinks them and aligns them at the bottom.Thanks.
So how did you do it?
by understand what iweb widgets do, in this case setting gridEntry widget's scalMode preference from fill to fit.
then reset the displayed image, so it fits in the display area even if it's portrait aspect.
however, i found some glitches in gridEntry widget that's quite strange... but all fix-able.
perhaps, iweb experts (whose had poked at my example) here can chime in. -
I have a perplexing problem, in firefox the iframe in the spry tabbed panel doesn't work any ideas?
I have made a page with spry tabbed panels, i have embedded an iframe in the content section of the second tab, this works perfectly well with Google, IE, Safari, Opera etc but just doesnt work in Firefox.
If I make the tab panel containing the iframe the Default tab then it works, i just cant figure out why,
By the way new to all this so be gentle please
<div id="main_column">
<div class="section_w500">
<h2>North Bali Listings</h2>
<div id="TabbedPanels1" class="TabbedPanels">
<ul class="TabbedPanelsTabGroup">
<li class="TabbedPanelsTab" tabindex="0">About North Bali</li>
<li class="TabbedPanelsTab" tabindex="0">Land</li> <<<<< This is the tab where the iframe is embedded in the content panel>>>>>
<li class="TabbedPanelsTab" tabindex="0">Houses / Villas /Apartments / Rooms</li>
<li class="TabbedPanelsTab" tabindex="0">Commercial</li>
</ul>
<div class="TabbedPanelsContentGroup">
<div class="TabbedPanelsContent">A property analyst recently said that limited land availability in the southern parts of Bali, especially in and around the Badung and Denpasar areas, has driven investors northward, in our opinion at this time it is an ideal opportunity to acquire property still at very sensible prices in this area, be it for investment or as a place of residence.. <br />
<p> <img src="../../../Images/Bali Scenes General/panoramic-views.jpg" alt="views" width="183" height="140" align="left" />Over the last few of years, investors have been targeting the northern area, principally along the coastline , with its variety of pristine black sandy beaches, pebble beaches and rugged coastline, offering a variety of activities; scuba diving, snorkelling, water sports, fishing, sailing. trekking gives this area the potential to be world-class tourist destination. Research has shown that property prices are set to rise above the average due to increased infrastructure development, and the planned opening of a new International Airport in the North shows the Bali Government's commitment to the develop this area as a future tourist destination.<br />
<br />
The Northern part of Bali is also an excellent base for exploration further afield, close to the main portal for trips to other parts of Indonesia. <br />
Although it is largely undeveloped there is a wide range of properties and land with beach front to panoramic rice paddy views still to be found at good value for money. </p>
<table width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><div class="AreasOfBaliHighlight" style="color: #60C; font-weight: bolder;">This is an ideal time to consider your dream property in this area; be it for investment, development or private use.</div></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p> The main tourist area in the North is arguably <span style="color: #F00">Lovina</span>, with property prices reflecting this especially beach front or with panoramic views so expect to see prices a little bit more expensive in and around this area. However inland prices are still very reasonable.<br />
<br />
<img src="../../../Images/Bali Scenes General/Traditional-lifestyle.gif" alt="village life" width="188" height="137" hspace="2" align="right" />Other areas to be found in the North going towards <span style="color: #F00">Gillimanuk</span> the main portal for the ferry to and from Java; include: <span style="color: #F00">Pemuteran</span> popular diving area, <span style="color: #F00">Menjangan</span> <span style="color: #F00">Island</span>, a popular diving and nature reserve; are also beginning to attract investors, resulting in prices rising.<br />
The area of the North of Bali travelling East from <span style="color: #F00">Lovina</span> towards the eastern part of Bali is quieter and more rural, with stunning coastline and secluded traditional village life, here life slows down, people are very friendly and happy to integrate with "Bule (Foreigner), this life style is definitely completely different to the hustle and bustle of the South of Bali, perfect for future development and peaceful retirement, and with the development of the new <span style="color: #F00">International Airport</span> in this area, about 1/2 way between <span style="color: #F00">Singaraja</span> and <span style="color: #F00">Almpura</span> in the East, which makes this area an ideal investment opportunity as property and land prices are set to grow in this part of North Bali faster than other areas.<br />
<br />
<img src="../../../Images/Bali Scenes General/img_bali_1.jpg" alt="Quiet Lanes" width="189" height="124" hspace="2" align="left" />It has to be said that facilities for schooling, medical services and shopping are not as good as in the South or around Ubud area, which have higher concentrations of established ex pat communities, and better facilities also the job opportunities are not anywhere near as plentiful as in the South or Ubud areas, which limits the lifestyle for many people looking to settle in Bali, careful consideration has to be given if your intention is for a place for you to reside, and it is possibly an area for consideration as an investment opportunity, or for a development of hotel or villa resort, or as a second retirement home. </p>
<p>There are of course facilities for all the usual services and plenty of job opportunities, and a small but growing ex-pat community, especially in and around <span style="color: #F00">Lovina</span> and <span style="color: #F00">Singaraja</span> just not as many as in the other popular areas for ex pat's. </p>
</div>
<div class="TabbedPanelsContent">
<p> </p>
<table width="100%" border="0">
<tr>
<td valign="top"><h7 style="color: #C03"><span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="font-size: 12px; color: #FFF;">Property Code BSP 00130101</span><span style="font-size: 16px"> </span>SAMBIRENTENG - North East Bali 7,300 meters (</span></h7>
<span style="font-weight: bold; color: #B90033;">73 ARE) Beach front flat wooded land for Sale/ Rent</span></td>
<td><span class="button_01"><a href="#" onclick="MM_openBrWindow('North Bali/Gold Package Listings/BSP-00130101/Sambirenteng Property Location Map.html',width=750,height=200')">Location Map</a></span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="77%" valign="top"><p>A golden opportunity to acquire a prime plot of beach front land in the North East of Bali in an area that enjoys newly awarded "Tourism Status" ideal for the development of a small hotel or villa complex, easy access to many popular tourist spots already developing in the North.</p>
<p> A 3 meter wide sealed road gives acces to the whole length of this prime plot of land: Electric (PLN) Water (PDAM) Telephone & Internet close to hand and readilly available</p></td>
<td width="23%"><a href="Carousel Sambirneteng Listings.html target="_parent"></a><iframe src="Carousel Sambirneteng Listings.html" allowtransparency="yes" frameborder="no" height="111" width="156" scrolling="No" align="middle" marginheight="0"></iframe></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">Purchase price<span style="color: #33C; font-weight: bold;"> 12,500,000,000 Rp</span><br />
Rental Price (25 years) <span style="font-weight: bold">9,450,000,000</span> <span style="font-weight: bold">Rp</span> <span style="color: #FFF"> (<span style="font-weight: bold; color: #3333D0;"> 5,200,000 Rp</span><span style="color: #3933D5"> </span> per are per year )<br />
Min Rental Period 25 Years, extendable to to a max of 75 years
(with full "Right Of Use" issued by owner)</span></td>
<td valign="top"><p class="button_01"><a href="../Gold Package Listings/BSP-00130101/BSP00130101 Details.html">Find out more</a></p>
<br />
<span class="button_01"><a href="../Gold Package Listings/BSP-00130101/BSP00130101_Enquiry Form.html" target="_parent">Make Enquiry</a></span></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><br />
</p>
<hr width="100%" noshade="noshade" />
<p> </p>
</div>
<div class="TabbedPanelsContent">Sorry we don't have any listings under this catagory at the moment,,, Check back later or register with us, and we will send you regular updates of any new properties we list.<iframe src="Carousel Sambirneteng Listings.html" allowtransparency="yes" frameborder="no" height="111" width="156" scrolling="No" align="middle" marginheight="0"></iframe></div>
<div class="TabbedPanelsContent">Sorry we don't have any listings under this catagory at the moment,,, Check back later or register with us, and we will send you regular updates of any new properties we list.</div>
</div>
</div>
<p> </p>
<p>
<h7 style="color: #C03"></h7>
</p>
<h2></h2><!-- this stays empty to put dotted line under listings block -->
</div>
<div class="cleaner"></div>
</div> <!-- end of main column -->Could you share a link to the page?
Seeing it in context and in our browsers is much easier to debug.
If not, make sure to run the validator here The W3C Markup Validation Service and clear out any problems. HTML errors, especially structural ones, will cause all kinds of display problems in various browsers/versions/platforms. -
OBIEE content cannot be displayed in the IFrame
Hi,
After embedding OBIEE 11.1.1.6.0 into EPM 11.1.2.1 EPM System Workspace ,i am getting below message ,while navigating through different dashboards (I have several tab's/pages under one dashboard and several dashboard links are present under each tab/page).
OBIEE content cannot be displayed in the IFrame .
I have tried the instanceconfig.xml and web.xml modifications And cleaning browser cache as per below blog ,but still the message is getting displayed .
http://atlantabi.blogspot.com/2011/12/obiee-11g-obiee-content-cannot-be.html
And After clicking OK , I am getting logged out of OBIEE .
Am I missing anything ?
Waiting for ur replies
sayaksayak wrote:
Hi,
After embedding OBIEE 11.1.1.6.0 into EPM 11.1.2.1 EPM System Workspace ,i am getting below message ,while navigating through different dashboards (I have several tab's/pages under one dashboard and several dashboard links are present under each tab/page).
OBIEE content cannot be displayed in the IFrame .
I have tried the instanceconfig.xml and web.xml modifications And cleaning browser cache as per below blog ,but still the message is getting displayed .
http://atlantabi.blogspot.com/2011/12/obiee-11g-obiee-content-cannot-be.html
And After clicking OK , I am getting logged out of OBIEE .
Am I missing anything ?
Waiting for ur replies
sayakHi Sayak,
Read through the content of this in MOS: Integration Of Obiee In 8.1.1.3: "OBIEE content cannot be displayed in the IFRAME" [ID 1296232.1]
Although applying the security setting is a workaround to fix this problem, oracle highly recommends to use Virtual IP or single OHS/Apache/IIS solution be adopted instead. -
I am sorry if thie is republished-My first time doing this and I am not sure what goes where and where to hear feedback.
Have published iweb site for five years with no problems and just opened a new site and get -
404: Page not found
This error is generated when there was no web page with the name you specified at the web site.-
Troubleshooting suggestions:
Ensure the page you are linking to exists in the correct folder.
Check your file name for case sensitivity . Index.htm is not the same as index.htm!
Temporarily disable any rewrite rules by renaming your .htaccess file if it exists
is the problem with
iweb or with hosting?
One Apple tech started to fix Iweb and had to end session and the next said problem with hosting at Network Solutions as it published
to local folder. NWS has checked sttting a few times-
Any help would be extremely appreciated as trying to fix this for about five weeks
Thanks VG
<Email Edited by Host>It's a really bad idea to post your email address - it's an invitation to spam - and I've asked the Hosts to remove it. (Even though I've now noticed you mis-spelled it! - anyway, never post your address in a forum.)
You have a site here: http://virginiagordon.com/www.virginiagordon.com/WELCOME.html
If that's not the page you are having trouble with, what is that page's URL? -
Why is Apple killing the Gallery and iWeb?
The loss of iWeb, iDisk and the Gallery is major. The Gallery is beautiful and functional. You have discretion with sharing your photos and videos. There is nothing like it. When it and the other functions are taken away next June when MobileMe disappears, I'll get nothing out of iCloud, as I do not have dozens of devices that need to be synced. What is/was great about the MobileMe photo galleries is that you could just send a link for friends to click on to see your photos. Viewers did not have sign in to a site, or provide their email addresses in order to view your photos — as has been my experience when others have sent me to Picasa or Flickr to see their pix. Why did Apple have to remove the galleries feature in order to advance iCloud? Was there a technological reason, or just someone arbitrarily deciding that "no one wants this anymore"? Same query about iWeb. I'm generally a big Apple fan, but upgrades/updates that remove useful and appreciated features — that were unique to Apple — make me cranky.
The reason is they try to make difficoult a sync with phones different from iPhone.
Well: I have an iPhone but if I go to the beach in sommer I prefer to carry a very small and simple Samsung. And have it synced !!!
They do not understand that even if you drive a Ferrari it is sometime a pleasure to drive a Fiat500 or a Smart. -
I wanted to create a photo album on dreamweaver with the same style as the ones in iWeb, does anyone know a site to do this or a way to transfer the album to dreamweaver?
Excellent suggestion! I regularly post in those forums too, so I thought I might offer help here, but http://forums.adobe.com/community/dreamweaver?view=discussions would be the best place for a Dreamweaver question.
Nancy O, Murray Summers or Mark Hollis there can be of plenty help. -
Lion Safari 5.1: pdf file is not opening inside the iFrame
"When trying to open the pdf file inside the iFrame, it is opening outside the iFrame in Preview Application and leaving behind the iFrame as blank . Earlier with Safari 5.0.5 version this problem was not coming and pdf was opening properly inside iFrame".
When I am creating a sample html file with below code, the pdf is opening out side the iFrame.
<iframe height="900" width="100%" src="TestPDF.pdf" id="displayPDF"/>
Can any one please help me out to resolve this issue and open the pdf file inside the iFrame with latest Lion Safari 5.1I think the problem must be limited to the iframe tag in particular, or frames in general. One of my websites has links to pdf files that open directly in the browser (see http://www.raffca.org.uk/docs/association_rules.pdf), but I have been unable to see a pdf if it should be loaded within a frame (such as at http://www.london-gazette.co.uk/issues/59866/supplements/14713); this latter page is not an iframe, but it is giving the same symptoms. I have removed any presence of the Adobe Reader plugin (I don't use Adobe Reader at all), so it is clearly a problem with Safari's built-in interpretation of frame/iframe PDF presentation. It's probably worth passing this on to Apple as a problem.
-
Walking the iframe DOM in Adobe AIR
Hi experts,
I'm trying to prog a small app with Flash CS4/AS3/AIR 1.5 and the HTMLLoader
Object. I can't figure out, if its possible with AIR walking the DOM in an IFRAME
with content from a remote URL (without access to the remote URL).
Maybe, so it is possible you can point me to the right direction.
KaiHi,
If you instantiate an HTMLLoader object that loads a remote URL, you can access the DOM of that page from flash (AS3) APIs like this:
myhtmlLoader.window.document;
However, if your HTMLLoader loads a local page that has an <IFRAME> pointing to the remote URL, you will only be able to access the DOM of the local page. You CANNOT go from there into the <IFRAME> DOM (via contentWindow.document) because of the cross domain restrictions enforced by WebKit.
Hope this helps,
Dragos Georgita | Adobe AIR Engineering -
Can I enlarge the size of the templates in iWeb
I use the templates in iWeb 1.1.2. Is there a possibility to enlarge the size of the standard templates sothat a template can be full screen if you publish it on the Web?
Greetings,
Volkert.Hi Photoforce
You can make the pages as wide or long as you like in iWeb, but the size will be fixed. You can then move/adjust the template components to your desired size.
However, there isn't an easy way to resize the page to the size of the user's screen without using some form of post-publish editing and javascript.
Michael
iMac 20" Intel Core Duo 2GHz -
Revision: 8531
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2009-07-13 12:25:57 -0700 (Mon, 13 Jul 2009)
Log Message:
If using an embedded font, need to measure the text with it so that if auto-sizing, the correct amount of space is allocated.
QA Notes:
Doc Notes: SDK-22205.
Reviewers: will be Gordon
Ticket Links:
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-22205
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/primitives/RichEditableText.asRevision: 8531
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2009-07-13 12:25:57 -0700 (Mon, 13 Jul 2009)
Log Message:
If using an embedded font, need to measure the text with it so that if auto-sizing, the correct amount of space is allocated.
QA Notes:
Doc Notes: SDK-22205.
Reviewers: will be Gordon
Ticket Links:
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-22205
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/primitives/RichEditableText.as -
Using the iFrame in Web Dynpro
Hi all,
Can a listener/event sender like in two different iviews to have it communicate with each other be done with two different iframes?
Thanks,
Jin BaeHi jin,
For ur iframes to be in a particular layout u can adjust its size and all and put this iframe in a column or row of the layout that u r using..
But as Armin said they r limited so its better if u need communication u can go for Portal Eventing.. (EPCF)
where u'll develop two components those wil have the iframes in them so then u can communicate between these components using EPCF method..
And one more thing is u can set the url property of that iframe to the url as said by Noufal...
But u cant do any eventing between two iframes as such in webdynpro without portal eventing..
Thanks & regards,
Sirisha. -
Generating the iFrame Dynamically
Hi Experts,
I need help in creating the iFrame dynamically. The following is the exact problem i am facing!
We have applications integrated in Portal using customized App integrator and with our own portal Layout defined.
The iframe that is generated in not dynamic with height and width.
if the integrted application is big then the height mentioned then we will get a double scrollbar.
If the fixed hight is set and when we navigate inside the application which is smaller than the fxied height then we get a big blank white page int he bottom.
So the only solution to fix this issue is to make the generated iframe dynamic.
Please guide me on how to do this!
Your inputs will be appreciated!
Thanks,
Srini.Hi Srinivas,
Please refer to the following documents:
Blog:
Escaping the Procrustean bed
Forum:
Resize IFrame
Dynamic src of an IFRAME
Hope they are useful.
Regards,
Seema Rane.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Hi. I am just about to move from the UK to Kuwait. Will I have any problems using my iPhone 4 and able to join a local carrier using this device please?
-
I can't sign in to my old Apple ID
I have read the ways to get apps downloaded with an Apple ID that no longer exists, but I can't do it for some reason. I deleted my first id and did new one after I stopped using the first email account. The old password didn't need cap letters or nu
-
How do i create a header that can be seen by seo for firefox?
So I've tried to make a bunch of different headers in iweb but they never actually publish as headers but as something different. When I run SEO for firefox it never detects any headers in my entire page. Is there a way to create a true header in iwe
-
Clientgen ant task throwing errors in Weblogic 8.1 SP4
When I try to run clientgen ant task for a WSDL (pertaining to a .NET webservice on a non-weblogic server) in Weblogic 8.1 SP4, I'm getting the following errors. I'm running setEnv command, clientgen ant task from command prompt in WLS_HOME/user_proj
-
Q57: AP Invoice and payment reconciliation
Dear All, Which table(s) can I use to see whether an AP Invoice has actually been paid. I can get AP Invoice information from OPCH & PCH1 but hwere do I get the reconciliation from? Thanks, Robin