Skip reconcile process

Hi gurus,
As far as I understand there is a process that reconcile GL module with AP and AR.
Due to customer needs I have to exclude some information from AP and AR (this is done changing informatica mappings and applying additional filters).
I don't want that any other process to come and reconcile AP/AR with GL and bring the excluded information. I want the process to leave data as it is...
Thanks in advance,
I.

Since you want to perform the Update Model Values phase manually, I think you want to skip that as well. Otherwise the components will update the model as is normally done.

Similar Messages

FICO Reconcilation process in ECC 6 version

Dear experts,
Please tell the process of FICO Reconcilation process in ECC 6 version and tell what are the settings i have to do in std SAP
Regards
venkataswamy

Hi ,
Check the below link , it contains the steps to configure FICO Reconciliation
http://www.sap-img.com/financial/how-to-configure-fico-reconciliation.htm
Hope it helps
SJ

Ap reconcilation process in oracle

Hi,
Please give detail information of AP reconcilation process in your company.
Thanks
Guru Prasad.
Edited by: guru_prasad on Apr 1, 2010 9:12 AM

Hi,
AP reconciliation:
Tie Liability account in AP with GL.
Reports:
1. Account Payable Trial Balance report of Previous month as a current month opening balance
2. Posted Invoice Register
3. Posted Payments register
4. Run the same report with current month
Use the formula:
1+2 - 3 = 4
if total is not matching you will need to find out the root casue of difference:
for e.g. Invalidated Invoice for the period
For the PTD activity check the "period Close Exception" if there are any invoices and payments which are not transferred to GL.
Thanks,
Ejaz

Need to skip one process in process chains

Hi Experts,
I have made some changes in the Endroutines at the third level target and moved the changes to BWP. Now, I need not extract the data from ECC. So I need to skip those process in the process chains for this.
How to achieve this?
Thanks in advance,
Abdul

Hi,
Right click on that process and display messages -> backg tab -> batch monitor > Stop the job.
it will be failed now with red status.
Now in the display messages , from the Chain tab
Take the Variant and Instance Name
Then goto SE11 - > RSPCPROCESSLOG
Give the Variant and Instance Name here and get other details like LOGID , TYPE..
Now goto SE38 -> RSPC_PROCESS_FINISH
Give all the details collected from above steps and fill the STATE value as 'G'
Execute.. This will Skip that process and start the next process in the process chain
If it is temporary then you can just copy that chain and remove that process step and run the chain.
Thanks
Nethaji Guru

How to prevent the program not to skip the process when exception is genera

Hi, friends.
How to prevent the program not to skip the process when exception is generated?
For example, I am doing a process for 100 records. If the 15th record causes a Java Exception, I want to be able to skip it and continue processing the remaining 85 records.
How it is possible with Java Exception handling? Any sample code?
Thanks,
Jaykishan

[http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/essential/exceptions/]
while (there are more lines) {
try {
process the next line
catch (...) {
log the error
}[http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/essential/exceptions/]
You'll want to be careful about which exceptions you catch though. For instance, if there's an unchecked exception, like NullPointerException, it's a sign of a bug in your code. Continuing to process as if that bug weren't there is often a worse approach than just failing. In this particular case, however, as long as you log the exception and then followup by fixing the bug that caused it, it may be acceptable to continue trying to process the rest of the file, even if some lines bring out a bug in your code.

External Bank Reconcilation Process

Hello Experts
Can any one tell me complete process of external bank reconcilation as I am getting data only in left panel and when click on reconcile tab error message box appears as "Reconciliation is not balanced. Create balancing transaction?"
Regards

Hi Harshita.....
Actually DTW template is there in SAP by oBankPages name. Whatever transactions you did related to your bank all that are present in your bank statement. You need to just arrange the bank statement in you template else you can fill the manual enties into the process external bank statement window in SAP. Then only it will come to RHS of the recon window......
Regards,
Rahul

Indirect elements with skip rule processed even if Skip_flag = 'Y'

Hi All,
I have an nonrecurring element "Sick Leave", multiple entries allowed. It is associated element for Absence Type = Sick Leave.
Formula Run results have 2 Indirect results for 2 different elements based on duration of sick leave (Sick leave <= 30 days, Sick leave > 30 days). Both elements are defined as nonrecurring and multiple entries allowed, and with skip rule (SICK_SKIP) that is not used while processing QuickPay. For testing I made it to always return Skip_flag = 'Y'.
When I put this skip rule on element "Sick Leave" than it works !
How can I check where is the problem?
PS. I'm in stage of setting up HRMS and Payroll for Bosnia, that doesn't have Oracle's localization.

HI
I want to skip one of two indirect elements based on their input value. Both indirect elements have input value CALCULATE that can be 0 or 1 (O-skip, 1-do not skip).
Skip formula should check this value and return skip_flag Y or N.
Now, I'm just testing this skip formula and expecting to skip indirect element that have skip formula.
Skip formula is just:
Skip_flag = 'Y'
Return Skip_flag
But, all 3 elements are processed.

How to skip sequentially processing of FTP-Adapter

Hello,
well we have the problem that on ftp are many files from many sources.
Sometimes one source send wrong structure in file that the processing is stopped.
It's stopped even though there are files in directory which are in right structure. But because the wrong files are "before" the right files the adapter is not processing the right structured files!
So how to get the adapter to process the "good" files?!
Quality of Service is not helping here!
Can someone help?
br

Dear Fritz,
You can Validate XML Paylod in PI 7.1, But this option is not available in lower versions.
Check here for the same
[Validating Source XMLPayload|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/5002ac06-aff3-2a10-6798-cbe11ca35535]
I think we can write an adapter module to filter unwanted XML payloads to be processed.
Best Regards
Praveen

STO reconcilation process

In STO Process,
An STO was created for an item for 100 units, but for some reason delivary was posted for 0 units. So these 100 units are sitting at StcktrsptOrderRel in Stock Overview (In MMBE at Plant level),
I wanted to remove these units from there. Please let me know the procedure.
1) Can I delete this STO item line, as delivery is 0.
2) I tried to create a new delivery (VL10B) with reference to STO, but as Batch for this materail doesnot exits, I am getting error.
Please answer this!! This has become a challenge.
Thanks for your time and concern.
Regards
Venkat

Hi Venkat,
If you have not picked the delivery follow the following process
1. T code VL02N and enter the delivery no.
2. Delete the line items where there is 0 units.
it will delink from the original document ie STO in your case. Then you can recreate the Delivery for the STO. In addition you can put the CANCEL in the field special processing indicator in the shipment Tab at the header level (if you have defined it in the IMG).
Hope this helps.
Thanks
Kiran

Regarding Reconcilation process

Dear all,
How can we reconsile the betwwen our source systems and target bw systems,
How many ways can we reconsile the data...
Can any body will tell the procedure how to reconsile the data in the suport projects?
Thanks

Hi BW,
The Data Reconcilation procedure is still in the SAP action item for the future release.
But we can reconcile the data by extracting the reports and compare with the query output in Excel sheet.
Please check for a tool "ExcelCompare" in google which is really useful in comparing excel files.
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/7a5ee147-0501-0010-0a9d-f7abcba36b14
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/biw/how%20to%20validate%20infocube%20data%20by%20comparing%20it%20with%20psa%20data
By this method you can compare your infocube data with PSA ones...clearly, every changes in R/3 (due to user exit or, above all, BW-specific standard logic) is not taken into account...if you want to consider also this part (back-end), there is no std method and it depends from every specific flow!
also check in service.sap.com/bi
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/7a5ee147-0501-0010-0a9d-f7abcba36b14
Hope this helps
Regards
Karthik.****Thanks for whatever points you assign me

Can someone help me with my iTunes? It says that I need to put in billing information. All I want is to sign in with my Apple ID but it says I NEED the information. Is it necessary to put in the correct information? or can I somehow skip the process?

My Itunes is not working and I need help ASAP!

Read here > iOS: Understanding the SIM PIN

Skipping of physical inventory process

Hi,
In each FY we carry out the physical inventory process, but as in this year user have monitor all the stock proeprly and online monitoring is done every month, so user want to not to carry physical inventory process so is there in problem or we can skip this process for this year.
Is there any eefect of this on system in present of future FY.
regards,
zafar
Edited by: zkarnalkar on Apr 1, 2011 8:32 AM

there is no negative effect within your SAP system if you do not perform a phyiscal inventory.
However, a physical inventory is in many countries demanded by law. If you can attest that you have done it, even you did not use SAP for this activity, then it is okay.

Process Improvement for Shopping Cart

I would like to have the availability to contact customer service regarding a recommended process improvement for Verizon customers. I have been a loyal Verizon since 2003, but my most recent experience is enough to drive me straight into the arms of T-Mobile and take them up on their offer to buy me out of all 6 contract agreements on my Verizon account.
I recently attempted to upgrade my device online. It was a relatively seamless process until I reached the end and got to the shopping cart. I elected to pick my phone up in the nearest store but to do so you have to pay online with a credit or debit card. You do not have the option to bill your account or pay in the store. As it turns out, the billing zip code that is associated with your credit card MUST match the service address zip code on your Verizon account. I am an identity theft victim and because of this all of my mail goes to a Post Office Box for security reasons. I obviously do not live in a Post Office Box, so my service address will never match the zip code on my billing address.
I am keenly aware that this is probably done for security reasons. Verizon doesn't want people obtaining a compromised account and sending a phone just anywhere. However, I was not opting to have anything shipped to me. I was picking up in the store so it should not matter what my billing zip code is.
The part that was most frustrating was the customer service individuals that I spoke with suggested things like (1) I should contact my bank and all of my bank statements and credit/debit card statements come to my house or (2) update my Verizon service address to the physical address of the Post Office even though I don't live there. When I was told to do option 2 listed above, I was told I had to log out of my account for the change to take effect and then re-log back in only to lose my entire order. All of this just to place an order and pick it up in a store. All I needed to do was just pay for my phone.
I next gave up and went in to the store. After an hour of waiting and trying to figure out where the problem was, the Verizon store couldn't take the coupon code that the customer service person had given me online. Translation - after all of this frustration with a dead-end result, I learned I was going to have to pay about $100 more for my phone. I walked away.
I went back online and the only option I had was to go back to square one and re-order online and this time, elect to have the phone shipped and billed to my account. I chose overnight shipping and just learned that the phone was shipped UPS ground and will be delivered after 5 days.
Needless to say, this has all been extremely disappointing and the most frustrating part is that it is all avoidable with a simple programming change. All of this was totally unnecessary. As an identity theft victim, I will NEVER have my mail delivered to the mailbox in my neighborhood. Does Verizon really want to offer that as a suggestion for people who want to buy a phone? Do they want to be responsible for the results? With identity theft being the fastest growing crime in America, somehow I just don't see that as a viable solution. There are many, many people just like me who don't have the same physical and billing addresses.
Finally, I will leave you with this question... Have you ever had this much trouble placing an order and paying for that order online? If I went to a store and purchased a phone in the store, would Verizon's payment processor care that the billing address on my credit card was different from the physical address where I live? NO! Companies are typically ready to take your money! It shouldn't be this hard to just pay someone for a phone.
If anyone can point me in the direction of how to make sure someone from Verizon Corporate is aware of this problem and that this is taken under consideration for future enhancements/changes to their eCommerce system it would be much appreciated.

Hi,
I think your process level evaluation id is not true, that is the reason system skips the process level.. Can you check your evaluation event-expression code. What do you see in SLG1? For testing purpose change the evaluation id to 0EV000 and check. Make Sure you debug through the user(requester) that you are creating the SC. Please test and let me know...
Saravanan

Process Controlled WF for Shopping Cart

Hi,
We have implemented process controlled workflow for shopping cart approval.
1. Created a bespoke schema for the approval process
2. Defined 5 process levels in the schema
3. changed the BRF event at the schema evaluation level. It now
contains a constant with the name of new schema create in step 1.
4. Decision set used is item based approval for partial documents (Type 4)
4. The first process level is get the technical approval from bespoke
table based on material group. For that we have first created a
Responsibility Resolver Name - ZTECHNICAL_APPROVER.
We have implemented the BADI - /SAPSRM/BD_WF_RESP_RESOLVER. Assigned
the filter as BUS2121 and ZTECHNICAL_APPROVER.
5. Now we have placed the external debugger in BADi. when we create
the shopping cart the flow doesn't stop at the break point. The item
reaches to the last step of Automatic approval (Rejected).
6. We think that schema is getting evaluated, however the process
level is not getting called.
7. Before we created schema, all the carts wer getting "Approved" by
automatic step. In our schema the automatic step is "Rejected", hence
the carts are getting rejected.
Could you please let me know what could be reason for BADI
implementation not being called or is there any config step which we
are missing?

Hi,
I think your process level evaluation id is not true, that is the reason system skips the process level.. Can you check your evaluation event-expression code. What do you see in SLG1? For testing purpose change the evaluation id to 0EV000 and check. Make Sure you debug through the user(requester) that you are creating the SC. Please test and let me know...
Saravanan

Process not running

I'm stumped. I have a really odd situation. Any help is appreciated...I've deleted the page, reloaded the app, deleted all the processes and recreated them...all to no avail.
I have about 20 after submit processes. Everything seems to look OK. However, a couple of the processes don't seem to be executing and others are executing but not listed in the debug on the page.
Example of debug:
0.03: ...Process "Get PK for PHYSICAL_INTERFACE_ID Create/Create Another": PLSQL (AFTER_SUBMIT) declare function get_pk return varchar2 is begin for c1 in (select PHYSICAL_INTERFACE_ID_SEQ.nextval next_val from dual) loop return c1.next_val; end loop; end; begin :P780_PHYSICAL_INTERFACE_I
0.03: ...Session State: Saved Item "P780_PHYSICAL_INTERFACE_ID" New Value="32"
0.04: ...Do not run process "Get PK for PHYSICAL_INTERFACE_ID Create/Done", process point=AFTER_SUBMIT, condition type=, when button pressed=CREATE
0.04: ...Process "Get PK for VIRTUAL_INTERFACE_ID Create/Create Another": PLSQL (AFTER_SUBMIT) declare function get_pk2 return varchar2 is begin for c1 in (select VIRTUAL_INTERFACE_ID_SEQ.nextval next_val from dual) loop return c1.next_val; end loop; end; begin :P780_VIRTUAL_INTERFACE_ID
0.05: ...Session State: Saved Item "P780_PKG_RETURN_VALUE2" New Value="ERROR: Problem Creating Virtual Interface Table"
0.05: ...Do not run process "Call stored procedure - Virtual Interface Create/Done", process point=AFTER_SUBMIT, condition type=, when button pressed=CREATE
After running the process "Get PK for VIRTUAL_INTERFACE_ID Create/Create Another" I would expect to see a session state saved similar to the physical interface at time .03 The saved item "P780_PKG_RETURN_VALUE2" actually occurs in a process at a later sequence (which is actually much later--it seems to have skipped a couple processes).
Has anyone else see this type of problem? The last thing I can do is recreate the whole page (ouch!).
Thanks,
-Carmine

Good afternoon. I am running Apex 3.1 and Oracle 10.2.0.4 on RHEL 4.
The stranger part is that I have another box running a slightly older version of the Apex application--and that one works. The differences were not in this area/on these pages. Strange.
I tried remove and rewrite all the processes, deleting the page and copying it from another load of the application, etc. Since it was a development box, I'm reloading everything.
I can try to get something up on apex.oracle.com. But it was so odd as Apex saw the processes. I even opened SQL developer to look at the processes and it looked good. Yet somehow it seemed to skip a process (not even show that it wasn't to run due to conditions), and the session state from the PK not showing but another process.
I've never seen anything like it. In my investigation, I will note that something went wrong (invalid) with ctxsys.driload. I forgot the exact error. I'm not very familiar with this package.
Thanks,
-Carmine

Skip reconcile process

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for