Skype calls pass through the PBX

Hi Skype Team,
Good day! Hope to get your immediate response. A supporting document would do for now if you are busy and could not answer immediately. Thank you.
Is the set-up below possible?
Skype to Skype calls pass through an Avaya PBX.
Skype user calls another Skype user and that call passes through the PBX.
Thank you very much,
Jamie Ong

The erase all content and settings option does exactly that - it erases everything on the iPhone except for iOS and included apps, and there would be no passcode prompt since it would have been erased.
If you have a connect to iTunes prompt, you must do as provided.
And if you are getting there is no SIM installed or the existing SIM is not compatible, this means the iPhone was hacked to be unlocked.
Sounds like you restored the iPhone with iTunes instead and when doing so with a hacked iPhone, it re-locks the iPhone to the carrier the iPhone was sold as carrier locked with when new. The original iPhone was sold as carrier locked only.
Or when doing the erase all content and settings option, it also erased the hack used to unlock the iPhone.
There is no way to get past this now except for having a SIM card inserted from the carrier the iPhone is carrier locked with.

Similar Messages

Does ODBC encrypts data while passing through the network?

Does ODBC encrypts data while passing through the network?

ODBC uses the underlying Oracle networking components to transmit data. By default, these components do not encrypt data, although they can be made to do so-- see the "SSL Encryption" thread from a few days ago.
Justin

My skype caller id shows the correct number but al...

When I call using my skype online number, caller id shows the correct number but also displays someone elses name. How can I remove the name?

I have the same problem. Although I have my Caller ID set to show my Skype Number businesses tell me they're seeing area code 559 with a random/different last 4 digits each time. I just went through an account verification with a vendor and it was impossible to get them to verify - kept telling me I need to be calling from the number they have on file.
Come on Microsoft. There's no way to actually get support (for a paid product no less), let alone see anyone participating in support (hic) forums to resolve countless issues that others are reporting.

Commas not correctly processed when values are passed through the URL!!!!!!

I think this is a bug. Any information about this will be greatly appreciated. Here's the scenario:
There's a single page with 2 regions. The first region contains a simple SQL report. The second region is and HTML region that contains text and date form elements. The SQL report has a column link "Edit" that when pressed it populates form elements in the HTML region. The population of the form elements is done by passing the column values of the select row as variables along the URL. The problem is that commas within column value text are processed as delimiters in the URL. From my understanding and documentation, variables and their values are supposed to look like this:
f?p=6000:6004:&APP_SESSION.::NO:6003:MY_ITEM1,MY_ITEM2,MY_ITEM3:1234,,5678
where MY_ITEM1 will be set to 1234, MY_ITEM2 will be set to null and MY_ITEM3 will be set to 5678 (The URL was copied directly from the Apex 3.0 documentation without modification).
However if the first value is text (lets say "some,thing") that contains a comma, then MY_ITEM1 will be set to the text preceding the comma in the first value (some), the MY_ITEM2 will be set to the text that comes after the comma in the first value (thing) NOT null and MY_ITEM3 will be set to null NOT 5678. Clearly, one would think that the comma in the first value should be escaped given that commas are used as delimiters of values in this URL scheme.
The URL looks like this:
f?p=6000:6004:&APP_SESSION.::NO:6003:MY_ITEM1,MY_ITEM2,MY_ITEM3:some%2Cthing%2C%2C5678
However the URL should look like this:
f?p=6000:6004:&APP_SESSION.::NO:6003:MY_ITEM1,MY_ITEM2,MY_ITEM3:some%2Cthing,,5678
where MY_ITEM1 is set to "some,thing", MY_ITEM2 is null and MY_ITEM3 is set to 5678
What does all this mean? This means that the escaped commas (%2C) are used as delimiters for the values. Additionally, any information that is passed that contains a comma will have it's comma escaped as well AND still considered as delimiters for values in the URL. Not to mention it's inconsistent with the official documentation.

Never mind... problem solved.
In the Apex docs says that you can embed commas if used within backslashes like: \123,45\.
So in order to pass text that has a comma through the URL, one must force Apex to code the URL like this (assuming that the text is coming from a report):
f?p=6000:6004:&APP_SESSION.::NO:6003:MY_ITEM1,MY_ITEM2,MY_ITEM3:\#A_COLUMN#\,,5678
Sorry... no bug. :)

[Q] Trigger an event for calls passing through a CUBE

Hi Guys
Are there any events I could catch to trigger a script for new calls as they pass through a CUBE?
I'm wanting to set up an alert based on a certain number been dialed.
Ta
Peter

Not directly, but Tcl IVR can help here. You can use IVR to generate a syslog message that EEM can process. I'm not sure if this is applicable to CUBE, though (it works with CME). Here's one such example implementation:
https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-19345

Skype calls go to the cellphone even though Skype for desktop is open.

I just got a Skype call to the cellphone, even though I had Skype opened on my desktop. I'd rather take the call from the desktop. How can I do it? Is there a way to make either cellphone or desktop a default option?

Unfortunately I still have not had any success eliminating this issue. I was in Best Buy the other day and one of the sales reps was talking to me about the Palm Pre and that he upgraded because he was having this problem with his 755p too. I don't think I have the update that you are talking about so maybe I will give that a try. I am in the same boat as you though....I don't have 3rd party software loaded on this phone and this problem has occurred on both 755p's that I have had. It's a **bleep** shame too because I am very happy with this phone otherwise. I am hoping that someone reads this thread who can tell us what the actual fix is (or at least that there isn't one) so I can decide what to do..........

TS1630 The only way I can place or receive calls is through the speakerphone or bluetooth.hone or

The only way I can receive or make calls is through speakerphone or bluetooth,

i have a 3gs i got a couple years back, and the major problem is that the phone doesnt play sound, unless you are on a call(speakerphone).i had upgraded the os, changed the speakers,headphone jacks and still the problem is there.

Anwering a skype call and stop the continious ring...

hello, why does the incomings call continue to ring after I have answered that call?

Please do a Skype reset.
Exit Skype.
Press WinKey+R
Type: %appdata% and press Enter.
Rename the folder "Skype" to "Old_Skype"
Run Skype.
Regards,
Tamim
Location - Dhaka | Bangladesh - Standard Time Zone: GMT/UTC + 06:00 hour
If one of my replies has adequately addressed your issue, please click on the “Accept as Solution” button. If you found a post useful then please "Give Kudos" at the bottom of my post, so that this information can benefit others.

One screen presentation problem on calls pass through cube

hello all,
may I have your advices about following problem;
this is flow diagram: cts codec (site A) -- >> cube -->> cts codec (site B)
if the codec in the site B is one screen as cts 1100 the presentation cant be shared bidirectional.
however if it is 3 screen as cts 3010 the presentation works fine.
this is the part of config:
voice service voip
ip address trusted list
ipv4 X.X.X.X
ipv4 X.X.X.X
rtp-ssrc multiplex
address-hiding
allow-connections sip to sip
redirect ip2ip
fax protocol t38 version 0 ls-redundancy 0 hs-redundancy 0 fallback none
sip
session transport tcp
rel1xx disable
header-passing
early-offer forced
midcall-signaling passthru
pass-thru headers unsupp
pass-thru content sdp
sip-profiles 1
copy-list 1
voice class codec 1
codec preference 1 aacld profile 1
codec preference 2 g722-64
codec preference 3 g711ulaw
video codec h263+
video codec h264 profile 2
video codec mpeg4
voice class sip-profiles 1
request INVITE peer-header sip Contact copy "(;video;audio;x-cisco-tip;x-cisco-multiple-screen=3)" u01
request INVITE sip-header Contact modify "$" "\u01"
dial-peer voice X voip
destination-pattern X...
video codec h264 profile 2
rtp payload-type cisco-codec-fax-ack 126
rtp payload-type cisco-codec-fax-ind 110
rtp payload-type cisco-codec-aacld 96
rtp payload-type cisco-codec-video-h264 112
session protocol sipv2
session target ipv4: X.X.X.X
voice-class sip bind control source-interface GigabitEthernet0/0xxx
voice-class sip bind media source-interface GigabitEthernet0/0xxx
codec aacld profile 1

hi
you have any string as
voice class sip-profiles 1
request INVITE peer-header sip Contact copy "(;video;audio;x-cisco-tip;x-cisco-multiple-screen=3)" u01
request INVITE sip-header Contact modify "$" "\u01"
change it with
request INVITE peer-header sip Contact copy "(;video;audio;x-cisco-tip;x-cisco-multiple-screen=*)" u03
request INVITE peer-header sip Contact copy "(;video;audio;x-cisco-tip;x-cisco-multiple-screen=(.*))" u03
request INVITE sip-header Contact modify "$" "\u03"
it will work.

High delay when traffic passes through the tunnel

Hello,
i have a dmvpn topology, .
When i try to ping the real ip on the hub's outside interface from the spoke, the delay is approximately 100ms, but when i ping the tunnel ip address the delay becomes 4000ms.
Your help is really appreciated

Can you post the configuration?
Did you set the MTU of the tunnel interface correctly?
Also check the switching (CEF/Process Switching) configuration.
Regards
Farrukh

Web Sphere let me call EJB through the firewall.

Finally I found some light on my problem related to the firewall.
Seems like the web Sphere gives you the option to specify the port for the application server to communicate with the client. Can I do similar stuff with Sun Application server? Or I ask our customer to use web logic instead?
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/wasinfo/v4r0/topic/com.ibm.support.was.doc/html/EJB_Container/1008407.html
Let me know if this can be easily done with the application server configuration.
Message was edited by:
skoizumi2133
Message was edited by:
skoizumi2133

Configuring the IIOP listener from the administration interface is possible in Sun application serverThis let you configure the initial port when ejb client connects to the application server but not the port the as talks back to the client.

Recording 2 sides of a Skype call

I have seen this topic posted over the last 2 years. Surely as popular as this is becoming someone at Adobe can weigh in and let us know if there is a work around or something coming?? I am on a new Mac and am beyond frustrated.

CCBUCKLES wrote:
But I guess I expected more out of an Adobe product to have an internal mixer. I understand the problem with skype calls coming through the headphones or speakers as an output...but surely there is a way internally around this. Or hopefully one that is coming.
Audition already has all the internal mixer it can possibly cope with, and on its own it won't help you to do work with Skype. As ryclark suggests, virtual audio cable may help you get the remote signal into Audition, but it won't help you with monitoring very much, if at all - I reckon that trying to do this within software would be rather more limiting than the external mixer method would ever be.
Doing anything at all clever with Skype is essentially not an Audition problem, and there's also a good chance that attempting to do anything at all using an internal sound device and Windows 8, for instance, will give you a lot of trouble with accessing all the signals you need. Honestly, the external mixer approach is always going to be best for this, because you will have zero-latency monitoring available for both signals, which you absolutely won't get if the remote side goes via Audition to be monitored, which it would have to with any form of internal routing at all.
So I'm afraid that there won't be an internal solution, as it would be pretty pointless because of the monitoring issues, and therefore inferior to the external one. And also because Audition is generic; it works with all sound devices and any solution to this would be essentially limited to devices which weren't crippled by OS restrictions, etc.

Weird noises in the Skype call that only i can hea...

so im getting these weird noise in skype, obviously, ANYWAY the first problem was that skype plays audio through the speakers instead of my headphones which i fixed by seletecting "Speakers and Headphones" as a default device and communication device and that solved the problem untill i had this problem which im asking RIGHT NOW, anyway im getting like a fan like static sound in the skype call i made sure that no one was using a fan in the call i was in and all of them werent using any, i then unplugged my headphones so the audio can be played through the speakers of my laptop and everyone could hear that noise, the only way i can fix this is by setting Communications headphones as a default device but then it brings me back to the problem of other audio such as youtube videos being played through the external speakers but if i disable "Speakers and Headphones" everything works but i cant ADJUST THE VOLUME OF EVERY INDIVIDUAL PROGRAM WTF? CAN SOMEONE HELP ME!

depending on your service provider, they're going to have to take care of it possibly with a ticket of sorts. usually it's an issue at the tower level. i can guarantee nothings wrong with your phone tho:D

Only some of the traffic passing through inline vlan pair

Here is my network setup
   firewall<---- >(g1/2)Coreswitch 6500 with IDSM(TG9/1)<-----> (TG9/1) Distrib switch with FWSM---------Accessswitch
configuration in core switch
interface GigabitEthernet1/2.11
description **** ****
encapsulation dot1Q 211
ip vrf forwarding VRF11
ip address 10.2.11.73 255.255.255.248
ip ospf network point-to-point
standby 1 ip 10.2.11.75
standby 1 priority 110
standby 1 preempt
interface GigabitEthernet1/2.37
description **** ****
encapsulation dot1Q 237
ip vrf forwarding VRF37
ip address 10.2.37.73 255.255.255.248
ip ospf network point-to-point
standby 1 ip 10.2.37.75
standby 1 priority 110
standby 1 preempt
interface TenGigabitEthernet9/1.11
description ****   ****
encapsulation dot1Q 311
ip vrf forwarding VRF11
ip address 10.2.11.2 255.255.255.252
ip ospf network point-to-point
interface TenGigabitEthernet9/1.12
description ****   ****
encapsulation dot1Q 312
ip vrf forwarding VRF12
ip address 10.2.12.2 255.255.255.252
ip ospf network point-to-point
configuration in Distribution switch:
interface TenGigabitEthernet9/1.11
description **** ****
encapsulation dot1Q 311
ip vrf forwarding VRF11
ip address 10.2.11.1 255.255.255.252
no ip route-cache
ip ospf network point-to-point
interface TenGigabitEthernet9/1.37
description ********
encapsulation dot1Q 337
ip vrf forwarding VRF37
ip address 10.2.37.1 255.255.255.252
no ip route-cache
ip ospf network point-to-point
i have seggregated n/w like this. i am using inline vlan pair , to pass all the traffic through the IDSM module ,
i am using the monitoring port gi0/8
config in core switch
intrusion-detection module 8 data-port 2 trunk allowed-vlan 211-260,311-360
IDSM
physical-interfaces GigabitEthernet0/8
subinterface-type inline-vlan-pair
subinterface 11
description
vlan1 211
vlan2 311
exit
subinterface 37
description
vlan1 237
vlan2 337
exit
Problem i am facing is , some of the vlan-pair traffic passing through the IDSM some of the traffic are not passing , here i have given the statistics
MAC statistics from interface GigabitEthernet0/8
   Statistics From Subinterface 11
      Statistics From Vlan 211
         Total Packets Received On This Vlan = 0
         Total Bytes Received On This Vlan = 0
         Total Packets Transmitted On This Vlan = 0
         Total Bytes Transmitted On This Vlan = 0
      Statistics From Vlan 311
         Total Packets Received On This Vlan = 0
         Total Bytes Received On This Vlan = 0
         Total Packets Transmitted On This Vlan = 0
         Total Bytes Transmitted On This Vlan = 0
Statistics From Subinterface 37
      Statistics From Vlan 237
         Total Packets Received On This Vlan = 3189658726
         Total Bytes Received On This Vlan = 64165872092928
         Total Packets Transmitted On This Vlan = 3549575166
         Total Bytes Transmitted On This Vlan = 64165872092928
      Statistics From Vlan 337
         Total Packets Received On This Vlan = 3549575166
         Total Bytes Received On This Vlan = 64165872092928
         Total Packets Transmitted On This Vlan = 3189658726
         Total Bytes Transmitted On This Vlan = 64165872092928
   Statistics From Subinterface 38
      Statistics From Vlan 238
         Total Packets Received On This Vlan = 2215151150
         Total Bytes Received On This Vlan = 64165872092928
         Total Packets Transmitted On This Vlan = 126546964
         Total Bytes Transmitted On This Vlan = 64165866995200
      Statistics From Vlan 338
         Total Packets Received On This Vlan = 126546964
         Total Bytes Received On This Vlan = 64165866995200
         Total Packets Transmitted On This Vlan = 2215151150
         Total Bytes Transmitted On This Vlan = 64165872092928
Give me idea experts , so that i can resolve this issue.
Help me thanks in advance

I believe the issue is because of the config below:
interface GigabitEthernet1/2.11
description **** ****
encapsulation dot1Q 211
ip vrf forwarding VRF11
ip address 10.2.11.73 255.255.255.248
ip ospf network point-to-point
standby 1 ip 10.2.11.75
standby 1 priority 110
standby 1 preempt
encapsulation dot1Q 311
ip vrf forwarding VRF11
ip address 10.2.11.2 255.255.255.252
ip ospf network point-to-point
interface TenGigabitEthernet9/1.12
description ****   ****
encapsulation dot1Q 312
ip vrf forwarding VRF12
ip address 10.2.12.2 255.255.255.252
ip ospf network point-to-point
As you can see we have 2 ip subnets in the VRF 11 .73 & .2 in vlan 211 & 311 respectively.
The switch is doing intervlan routing directly without having to go through the IDSM for VRF 11.
What we need to remember is IDSM does not do routing, and it can only bridge vlans.
Hence we have to force to packet to go through the IDSM.
Here is what we do when we use IDSM to see traffic going between vlans.:
Normally, with vlans, and IDSM inline mode, we have one IP subnet and 2 Vlans.
IDSM2 in inline mode necessitates an additional artificial Vlan on the SAME subnet as the Vlan you wish to sense.
A layer 3 switch interface needs to be configured within this additional artificial Vlan.
In a nutshell, we need to create 2 Vlans that share one same ip subnet and put SVI on only one of the Vlans.
In your case you will need one ip between vlans 211 & 311 in VRF 11 to force the data to go through the IDSM.
I can understand if this is a bit tricky to understand.
Please go through my design document for IDSM inline mode, which explains the basic concepts and packet walk in detail.
It will explain why we need the above and how arp makes the mac-address table populate correct entries, (with one ip subnet for 2 vlans) so that traffic goes through the IDSM.
https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-12206
- Sid

Pass Through Payments

Hello Finance Experts,
Can you advise please if there is functionality to achieve the following in SAP? Is there a concept called 'Pass Through payments' or something similar whereby open invoices in SAP that are due for payment could be scheduled to run automatically every morning for payment without input from an end user?
Thanks for any

As mentioned, you can shedule a Background Job. Go to transaction sm36 for shedulling the Job and Sm37 for monitoring backgrond job. Similarly customer incoming and outgoing payment can be sheduled and executed.
Thanks & Regards
Jomon.

Skype calls pass through the PBX

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for