Skype To go Quincy MA Local Call NXX

Hi, I have been trying to set up Skype to go number for my local phone at Quincy. I keep getting number 617-934-XXXX which i couldn't call from my local phone. I am wondering if there is anyway to set up the NXX (the 4th to 6th digit) number as well? Or if there is any other way?
Thanks,

Polka25 wrote:
if I want to use Taiwanese numer to call Polish number (after entering PIN code)
You can't. There are no Taiwanese STG #s. If you use a regular Polish cell phone to call from Taiwan you will be charged substantial roaming fees. Best solution? - purchase a smartphone and download/ install Skype.
TIME ZONE - US EASTERN. LOCATION - PHILADELPHIA, PA, USA.
I recommend that you always run the latest Skype version: Windows & Mac
If my advice helped to fix your issue please mark it as a solution to help others.
Please note that I generally don't respond to unsolicited Private Messages. Thank you.

Similar Messages

What Prefixes Are Included In My Local Calling Area?

I am in the former GTE service territory, specifically, the Elsinore Main California exchange.
On Friday, December 11, 2009, I spoke with a service representative and a supervisor (who admitted that she was "filling-in" and is really an hourly employee), who are in the soon to be divested Everett, WA call center.
I was calling to find out what prefixes are included as part of my local calling area, specifically ZUM 1 AND ZUM 2 (some also call it Zone 1 and Zone 2, but the correct designation in most southern California service areas of Verizon is ZUM).
Both representatives had no idea what a "ZUM" is, and the "supervisor" said she had never heard of the term ZUM or Zone.
What made me upset is that I was told that they (Verizon) did not have this information, and I would have to contact the CPUC (California Public Utilities Commission) to obtain this information as Verizon's staff would not have it.
My reply was how would Verizon not have the information, because they would need the ZUM prefix list for each exchange so they could bill correctly.
I then asked how does Verizon gather all the calls that are made from their exchanges each month and send this data to the CPUC so that Verizon can then determine if the call is ZUM 1, ZUM 2, ZUM 3 or intralata or interlata?
The "supervisor", said yes, because Verizon would not know what prefixes are included, and relies upon the CPUC to review the calls from Verizon's exchanges and prefixes so that Verizon can bill their customers each month, and this has been the process for many years (according to the "supervisor").
I kid you not, this what was said to me by the Verizon representatives, and I shoulld have advised the employees that I was recording the call. It would have been a great play for You Tube. What a bunch of (edit) from these two Verizon call center representatives!
I'm glad Verizon is divesting the Everett call center along with other assets to Frontier, as people like these should not be employed by Verizon, in fact, they should be terminated for cause. Good luck to Frontier with the Everett call center.
Using Verizon's web site when trying to determine what prefixes are in my local calling area (ZUM 1 AND ZUM 2), you are directed to use the following two "very helpful" (my words...lol) links for information...please try for yourselves:
To obtain Local Calling Area information
http://www22.verizon.com/Content/CommonTemplates/sorry.html
Zone Usage Measurement (ZUM) Information
https://www22.verizon.com/ResidentialHelp/Phone/Calling+Plans/Local+And+Regional+Calling+Plans/Gener...
Great Information Verizon!! Both are dead links.
Anyway, point me in the direction where I can obtain the current and accurate prefixes that can be called without charge to ZUM 1 and ZUM 2, and with a charge to ZUM 3 for my exchange and prefixes. DO NOT point me to a white pages directory because that is already outdated (and I do not have a white pages directory).
Again, my exchange is Elsinore Main, and the prefixes are 951-245 and 951-674.
Thank you.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Home Exchange, Zone 1 and 2 are Local Calling
Zone 3 (ZUM) 13-16 Miles:
PEAK PERIOD RATES: Day 8A-5P   M-F
                          1st Min of Use       Addl Min of Use
                               $.10                          $.04
OFF-PEAK RATE PERIOD: Evening 5P-11P M-F
                               $.07                          $.028
OFF-PEAK RATE PERIOD: Night 11P-8A M-F; SA, SU, & HOLIDAY - All Hours
                               $.04                          $.016
COMMUNITY ---NPA ---NXX ---ZONE -----
ELSINORE ---951 --- 226 245 253 285 471 579 609 674 678 805 --- Home Exch
LAKEVIEW-NUEVO --- 909 --- 251 --- Zone 3
LAKEVIEW-NUEVO --- 951 --- 878 916 928 --- Zone 3
MURRIETA --- 909 ---3 32 --- Zone 2
MURRIETA --- 951 --- 200 219 239 249 304 440 445 461 473 600 671 677 691 696 698 704 813 816 834 837 894 970 973 ---Zone 2
PERRIS --- 909 --- 330 --- Zone 2
PERRIS --- 951 --- 210 229 230 238 259 287 345 378 385 436 442 443 490 550 570 575 581 591 623 657 722 796 940 943 956 --- Zone 2
RANCHO VIEJO --- 949 --- 259 269 284 292 303 326 350 446 480 584 625 702 728 874 --- Zone 3
SUN CITY --- 909 ---508--- Zone 1
SUN CITY --- 951 --- 244 246 301 566 639 672 679 723 746 821 --- Zone 1
TEMECULA --- 909 --- 298 507 668 828 --- Zone 3

Refund local calls PREMIUM account in order to get...

I recently bought a Skype number and Premium subscription at the same time.
When I subscribed, there was only one option which was to buy Premium for local calls in my country.
I discovered afterwards that paying 1 more € will get me unlimited European calls.
I would like to switch, but after I had a chat with Skype staff they said it's not possible (i.e. it's a burden for them).
What can I do without the obvious bad solution of buying a 2nd unlimited plan... ?
Thanks

http://www.networkworld.com/news/2012/020612-mdm-apple-255756.html says that for push and developer there are different requirements.
Also, http://www.air-watch.com/downloads/GenerateAPNsCertificate.pdf says that
"This does not have to be an Apple Developer Account. It can be any AppleID."
But still with free apple ID I don't see anything that let's me create a certificate

Making a local call when overseas

I normally live in Canada.
I was in Hong Kong a few months ago and delayed at the airport for 6+hrs. My HK sim card had run out of call time. I tried using my Skype credit and the airport Wifi to make a local call to a Hong Kong mobile number. It just wouldn't work.
Here's what I did:
+852 the Hong Kong number
In a few months, I'll be traveling again and I'm planning to use a portable Wifi (to be rented in the foreign country). The country has strict regulations about using foreign phones and foreign sim cards but to buy one of their phones is a pain in the rear end (and could take several days to activate). Using the portable Wifi, I hope to be able to surf the Internet but more importantly, to be able to make LOCAL calls.
From my experience in Hong Kong, I'm worried that Skype doesn't allow local calls. How's that possible?

Any ideas?

Skype number not displaying correctly with Caller ID

Hello, I have had my Skype number for several years and it's been no problem for those with Caller ID to have my Skype number displayed when receiving a call from me. However, the past few months this has changed dramatically. Now, my Skype number is NEVER displayed when calling someone and in fact, most of the time it displays numbers or even names randomly which have zero relation to myself or my number. Other times, the users Caller ID will display "Skype User". Why has this suddenly happened and what can be done to ensure that it's corrected and working properly again?
My account is indeed configured to display my Skype number (as it has been for several years), but this has no longer has any bearing whatsoever on the number displayed when I call someone. I have found that some people are no longer accepting my calls since they have no idea that I am the one calling them.
This is happening when I call numbers in the U.S. and sometimes Canada and does not matter where my physical location is - if I am in the U.S., U.K., Hong Kong, Taiwan, etc, the result is always the same - my number is NOT displayed.
If anyone could offer some advice which would take care of this, I would be most appreciative. Thank you, Greg

Yes, I have read that FAQ and I realize Caller ID does not work for all countries. But that same FAQ indicates that Caller ID is available for the U.S. And this is where I make the majority of my calls. However, as I mentioned in my original post, my Caller ID has NOT been displayed for several months. What is displayed are randomly changing phone numbers and names that have no bearing whatsoever with anything related to my actual Skype number or name. I've done my own testing when calling my home phone from Skype. I'll call multiple times in quick succession and I will get different results each and every time. The last six calls to my home from my Skype number resulted in the following results: Number displayed not related to my Skype number (different area code entirely)A completely diferent number displayed not related to my Skype number (again, different area code entirely)Name displayed which is not a name I have ever been acquainted with beforeA completely diferent number displayed not related to my Skype number (again, different area code entirely)"Skype User" displayedA completely diferent number displayed not related to my Skype number (again, different area code entirely) If Caller ID is no longer offered in the U.S. the Caller ID FAQ should be updated to reflect this change.

Skype number not displaying correctly with Caller ...

Hello,
I have had my Skype number for several years and it's been no problem for those with Caller ID to have my Skype number displayed when receiving a call from me.
However, the past few months this has changed dramatically. Now, my Skype number is NEVER displayed when calling someone and in fact, most of the time it displays numbers or even names randomly which have zero relation to myself or my number. Other times, the users Caller ID will display "Skype User". Why has this suddenly happened and what can be done to ensure that it's corrected and working properly again?
My account is indeed configured to display my Skype number (as it has been for several years), but this has no longer has any bearing whatsoever on the number displayed when I call someone. I have found that some people are no longer accepting my calls since they have no idea that I am the one calling them.
This is happening when I call numbers in the U.S. and sometimes Canada and does not matter where my physical location is - if I am in the U.S., U.K., Hong Kong, Taiwan, etc, the result is always the same - my number is NOT displayed.
If anyone could offer some advice which would take care of this, I would be most appreciative.
Thank you,
Greg

Yes, I have read that FAQ and I realize Caller ID does not work for all countries. But that same FAQ indicates that Caller ID is available for the U.S. And this is where I make the majority of my calls. However, as I mentioned in my original post, my Caller ID has NOT been displayed for several months. What is displayed are randomly changing phone numbers and names that have no bearing whatsoever with anything related to my actual Skype number or name. I've done my own testing when calling my home phone from Skype. I'll call multiple times in quick succession and I will get different results each and every time. The last six calls to my home from my Skype number resulted in the following results:
Number displayed not related to my Skype number (different area code entirely)
A completely diferent number displayed not related to my Skype number (again, different area code entirely)
Name displayed which is not a name I have ever been acquainted with before
A completely diferent number displayed not related to my Skype number (again, different area code entirely)
"Skype User" displayed
A completely diferent number displayed not related to my Skype number (again, different area code entirely)
If Caller ID is no longer offered in the U.S. the Caller ID FAQ should be updated to reflect this change.

SKYPE ABUSIVE CHARGES OF NON COMPLETED CALLS!

I like the idea of a class action against Skype for abusive charging of non completed calls.
I sometimes call the same number and it drops 2-3-4 times before it can connect and Sleaze Skype charges me CAD 0.096 for EVERY ONE of those dropped calls.
Can you imagine, if Skype has, as they claim millions of customers how many millions they collect on our back because their lousy system dropped the calls ??? Just think about it !!
Download and check your call summary and you wil be amazed to see how many "fixed charges" you paid while not connecting.
E-mail me if this has happened to you so we can build up a case.

I am glad to hear that U R an employee and not just "any moderator" but I still find it kind of invasive that "any skype employee" can look into my call log w/o my express request / permission...
As far as contacting CS, I did it once and all I got was a "canned answer" asking me do pretty much anything short of reformating my hard drive ... see below
QUOTE:
We have refunded the calls to your balance and apologize for the inconvenience.
The call history list in the My Account section does not currently reflect refunded calls but it will be reflected in your account balance.
Here are a number of suggestions which you should try to help resolve this issue. Please test after each step to see if the action has resolved the problem:
1) Ensure that you are using the latest version of Skype, available for free from: http://skype.com/download/
This solves the issue for most Skype users as we are constantly improving our product
2) Use our Sound Setup Guide to make sure your audio settings are correct:
http://www.skype.com/help/guides/soundsetup.html.
If you have more than one audio device to choose from in Skype -> Tools -> Options -> Sound devices, then please try with different selections.
3) In the Skype top menu: Tools -> Options -> "Connection" window; please tick the option to use the ports 80 & 443.
4) Check that your firewall is not interfering with Skype. You can find our firewall guides at http://www.skype.com/help/guides/firewalls/. Even if it can connect and you are able to use chat it is possible that your firewall is still blocking some connections that Skype needs for a reliable voice call.
5) For this step showing hidden folders and files has to be turned on. Please navigate to My Computer -> Tools -> Folder Options -> View. Once there, please make sure that the option "Show Hidden Files and Folders" is enabled.
* Close Skype with a right click on the systray icon (next to the Windows clock) and selecting "Quit"
* Locate the shared.xml file found in
C:\Documents and settings\Your Windows Username\Application data\Skype\shared.xml
* Delete shared.xml
* Start Skype (shared.xml will be recreated)
6) Make sure all your PC's drivers are up-to-date (especially sound, video, motherboard controllers and network card - you can usually find the latest drivers on the manufacturer's website).
7) If you are using a router, please configure a port forwarding for Skype. You can find guides for an extensive list of routers on http://www.portforward.com/english/applications/port_forwarding/Skype/Skypeindex.htm. Please note that we are not responsible for this page and contents might change unexpectedly.
UNQUOTE
I will try again .....?

ANOTHER Step BACKWARDS - NO, You CANNOT SEE Your LOCAL Calling Area ONLINE !!

Why check your LOCAL calling area? TO SAVE Yourself MONEY. If you can check the calling area quickly, you can tell if it will be a TOLL CALL. Sure, this is not an issue depending on your calling plan. It is to a lot of folks like me; and you may be calling from a different phone at times.
Up until at least January 2008 you could EASILY determine your LOCAL CALLING AREA on Verizon's website by entering your phone number. The link WAS
http://www22.verizon.com/CallingAreas/localCallFinder/LocalExchangesList.htm , but NO MORE.
I SUSPECT it was discontinued because Verizon realized that by making a MONEY-SAVING 'device'
easily available was NOT GOOD FOR THE BOTTOM LINE.
I went thru all of Verizon's hoops to get an answer, but they have their roadblocks firmly planted.
Their is A LOT OF JUSTIFICATION for CONSUMER REPORTS to give its highest ratings to Verizon's SERVICES...... WHILE AT THE SAME TIME RATING THEIR CUSTOMER SERVICE "DREADFUL".

Hi GimmieDps,
I'm sorry you are having difficulty with your calls from home. I have escalated your concern and an agent with access to your account will reach out to you directly by email, private message in the Forums and/or the billing telephone number on your Verizon account for more information or to help you resolve your issue.
Regards,
SunshineF

Long distance in local calling area

I have set up some Skype to go numbers in my calling area and some of them are working but when I dial others Bell Canada says the number is a long distance number. Is there any way to chose the number (ie 613 927 XXXX or 613 434 XXXX) instead of it being automatically assigned? ANy help would be appreciated!

a STG number is mapped to a single target number, and that number must always be entered in international dialing format (i.e. exactly the same way you would dial it if you were wanting to call it using SkypeOut on any Skype client)
Regards,
Neil

Local Calling Area

Why, with all the technology Verizon so proudly touts in all its commercials, can we not find out our local calling area on the web site? Instead, we're directed to go look it up in the paper phone book. Give me a break. It's all stored away in a database somewhere and it's really a no-brainer to allow access to it. Honestly, that is just completely lame in this day and age.

Thats a great idea! This would be a perfect candidate for the Verizon Idea Exchange. Please search on the idea exchange and cast your vote. There may be another member who made the same suggestion. If not, please add a new idea so your fellow community members can comment and vote on your suggestion. http://forums.verizon.com/t5/Verizon-Idea-Exchange/ct-p/ideaexchange . The Verizon Idea Exchange is there for you to submit your ideas and suggestions to Verizon so that we can consider them as we innovate our products and services.
Anthony_VZ
**If someones post has helped you, please acknowledge their assistance by clicking the red thumbs up button to give them Kudos. If you are the original poster and any response gave you your answer, please mark the post that had the answer as the solution**
Notice: Content posted by Verizon employees is meant to be informational and does not supersede or change the Verizon Forums User Guidelines or Terms or Service, or your Customer Agreement Terms and Conditions or plan

LOCAL CALLING AREA FOR HOME PHONE (landline)

Verizon has not resolved my issue with my ability to call ONE of my LOCAL CALLING AREAS. They have passed me NUMEROUS times over and over to many different problems and have not resolved anything. They say they cannot hold on the line while they wait for a supervisor, I keep hearing i will be called back, and do not get any calls back. They "say" they are working with me and a supervisor, and yet still nothing. I contacted the Local Access Transport Area (LATA) and have been told that the numbers I am trying to reach ARE local. Also, I have NEVER had any problems reaching these numbers in the past and ALL OF A SUDDEN 1 out of the 7 local calling areas I cannot call. The local calling area HAS NOT changed and never will according to LATA. One of the reps had the nerve to tell me that another of the "local calling areas" I have is regional, so I had to burst her lil "tell me anything to shut me up" bubble, that she was not gonna feed me that line of **bleep** seeing how I just got off the phone with someone in that area. Verizon seems to be feeding me a lot of **bleep** to try and silence me or so they dont have to try and figure this out. (cause apparently they cant) I have been dealing with this for over a week, many Reps, many repair techs and NOTHING. The repair Techs (automated recording) calls me back and says We cannot find the problem but your line is working properly. ARE YOU KIDDING ME!! DUH! NOW, I have no choice but to contact Consumer Affairs and file a complaint, and I have also been advised to contact the BBB and local television station so that they can run a story. WHAT TO DO NOW!!!

Hi GimmieDps,
I'm sorry you are having difficulty with your calls from home. I have escalated your concern and an agent with access to your account will reach out to you directly by email, private message in the Forums and/or the billing telephone number on your Verizon account for more information or to help you resolve your issue.
Regards,
SunshineF

Are there any apps which will allow local calling using data only that do not require any special numbers called out initially and does not require the receiver to have a similar app or account?

Are there any apps which will allow local calling using data only (not minutes, no extra charge) that do not require any special numbers called out initially and does not require the receiver to have a similar app or account? Just for random local calling.

Yup.
Here is a way you could solve this by adding an extra column and a small lookup table:
The lookup table is here for the copying:
0
1
k
kilo
2
M
mega
3
G
giga
4
T
tera
5
P
peta
6
E
exa
7
Z
zetta
8
Y
yotta
In table 8 (the one on the left in the image) column A is where the values are.
B1=A1÷(1024^VLOOKUP(INT(LOG(A1, 1024)), Binary Prefixes::A:D, 1))&" "&VLOOKUP(INT(LOG(A1, 1024)), Binary Prefixes::A:D, 2)&"B"
this is shorthand for... select cell B1, then type (or copy and paste from here) the formula:
=A1÷(1024^VLOOKUP(INT(LOG(A1, 1024)), Binary Prefixes::A:D, 1))&" "&VLOOKUP(INT(LOG(A1, 1024)), Binary Prefixes::A:D, 2)&"B"
select cell B1, copy,
now select all the cells in column B, paste

How can use EJB local call in WLS 7.0 without EAR

I have web application as jsp files.
and I made .jar for some EJBs
and I used local call for calling EJB from jsps in WLS 6.1
but in WLS 7.0 .. occured error calling EJB as Local call
while JNDI lookup.
So I packed all applications as EAR and deployed then all works good.
but in developing I want to use JSPs as jsp files.
There is no way to use Local call to EJB in WLS 7.0 without packing EAR ? (like
WLS 6.1)

The way JNDI lookups were implemented in 6.1 allowed to deploy individual ejb-jars
and access their local interfaces via JNDI lookups from other ejb-jars during
development. In production all ejb-jars will be packaged into an ear.
This is extremely helpful on large projects. E.g. my current project has over
120 CMP entity beans and over 40 session beans. Even on 2GHz class machine with
1Gb memory and JDK 1.4 (to enable full-speed debugging) it takes almost a minute
to deploy the ear (no matter whether it is exploded or not). It takes minutes
with 1.3 and debugging turned on.
6.1 implementation allowed to "pre-deploy" relatively static ejb-jars and still
access their local interfaces (by putting them on WL system classpath and deploying
as individual ejb-jars, so classes are accessible to local clients; it requires
WL restart when they are changed, but they don't change often). So during development
only changed jars (typically session facade) need to be redeployed on changes,
which takes only seconds. We didn't have problem with JNDI lookup performance
since we use the EJBHomeFactory pattern.
The behind-the-scene JNDI optimization "improvement" introduced in 7.0 makes it
no longer possible to use this technique, since even though classloading still
works in the same way, no objects are bound to JNDI tree and thus could not be
access from another ejb-jar. This significantly impacts developer productivity
(in our large project). It's not only about minutes lost (which btw makes hours
over time), it just disrupts developer's train of thought to have such long round
trip times. In fact this is the reason we are not going to migrate to WL 7.0.
Is it possible to provide an option to turn this "optimization" off and actually
bind JNDI objects?
Thank you,
Sergey
"Dimitri I. Rakitine" <[email protected]> wrote:
Park <[email protected]> wrote:
Thanks Rakitine.
I wonder if I use EAR while developing could I apply changes to EARwhithout packing
again.Sure - you can simply deploy your app as an 'exploded' EAR during development.
There is no probelm delivering time but in developing time ..
If I can not use that kind of way how can I make modification ?
Plz. let me know.
And I have one more question.
When I use EAR I met some problem.
I packed all JSP into one .war file.
fot that I had to inclde requred classes into .war because jsps usethese classes.
then I packed EAR file with WAR and some EJB jar files.
After then I deployed EAR file to WLS.
But If remove classes from classpth while EJB deploying Error occured.Because
EJBs reference these classes.
I thoght if I packed classes into .WAR .. there is no problem.
But Error occured.
I have to include classes into classpth for that ? or
Any mistakes in my way.No, you do not have to add anything to the system classpath. In fact,
you should
make sure that none of your application classes are in the system classpath.
thank you.
"Dimitri I. Rakitine" <[email protected]> wrote:
Yup, that appears to be the difference between 6.1 and 7.0 - in
6.1 success of a local invocation depended only on the Classloaders
arrangement, so everything worked when you added your classes to the
system classpath. In 7.0 looks like it also depends on the application
context - that's why you cannot do a JNDI lookup from another deployment
unit.
Is there any reason why you do not want to use EAR's ???
Park <[email protected]> wrote:
in WLS 6.1 ..
I have EJB as jar files. (deployed each to WLS)
and I added EJB interface class to classpath.
and I made WebApplication as Directory (not war file).
in that webappication jsp call EJB as Local interface.
These environment .. local call workes well in WLS 6.1.
but in 7.1 not works .. (JNDI look up error)
of course Remote call works well. and If I make EAR .. works well.
Rob Woollen <[email protected]> wrote:
You can have an exploded EAR and have it work.
Can you give some more detail on how you are deploying in 6.1. Is
it
an
exploded EAR, or do you have the ejb interfaces in the classpath?
This behavior should not have changed between 6.1 and 7.0.
-- Rob
park wrote:
I have web application as jsp files.
and I made .jar for some EJBs
and I used local call for calling EJB from jsps in WLS 6.1
but in WLS 7.0 .. occured error calling EJB as Local call
while JNDI lookup.
So I packed all applications as EAR and deployed then all works
good.
but in developing I want to use JSPs as jsp files.
There is no way to use Local call to EJB in WLS 7.0 without packingEAR ? (like
WLS 6.1)
Dimitri
Dimitri

Dialing area code for local call - is this normal?

Just had my FIOS triple play installed over the weekend. In the recent past I've used VOIP providers Optimum Voice, Vonage, Packet8, MagicJack and Ooma, and FIOS is the only one that makes me dial my area code to make a local call (I'm in area code 516, where it is not normally necessary to do so).
Is this a bug in the system, and if so, are there any plans to fix it? When I first signed up with Optimum Voice they had a similar problem, but that was 9 years ago!

It is disgraceful that when I signed up for FIOS that I was not informed that I would have to us my area code to call my next door neighbor!!! My realtives that use Fios do not have to do that. They advertise like everything is local buy when I called to complain I'm on the phone with people in Texas who do not even work for Verizon!!! I will be call the Public Service Commission, Better Business Bureau and Consumer Affairs on Monday. The Technical Support people who I waited on hold 15 minutes to speak to were rude and say if I pay more I can have this issue resolved!!! Bait and Switch if I ever heard it!!

Lifeline Service removed and Unlimited Local Calling added, what gives?

I received quite a shock when I received my bill recently. Apparently, my Lifeline Service was removed and Unlimited Local Calling was added instead, tacking on an additional $12 to my landline bill. What gives? I do plan to call Verizon to investigate the matter on Monday, but I am wondering why this is. Is it because Lifeline Service requires that I renew after a number of years, or what?

I'm afraid that's the kind of answer you can only get from Verizon. It looks like your issue may require a Verizon representative to review your account details. Please contact our customer service team via live chat or email at:
http://www.verizon.com/contactus
Choose “Live Chat.”
If a chat agent is available to assist you, the chat link will become live after the page is fully loaded.

Skype To go Quincy MA Local Call NXX

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for