Slideshow plays too slow

In Settings-Photos I set "Play each slide for 2 seconds" but they are playing for 5 seconds. When I set it to 5 secs, they play for about 8. Is the transition adding 3 secs?!! I want to share photos with friends, and 5 seconds is way too long. I can't even turn the transition off.

If it makes you feel any better, I have the same problem. My audio is slow or sometimes I get music & no lurics (or on videos I get the background music & no dialog). I tinkered around once & got it fixed but now the problem has resurfaced. If there is an answer out there I'd love to hear it! (I have tried resetting)

Similar Messages

Animated Gif's Playing too slow

Lately since I installed leopard animated gif's are showing up on safari too slow and its not on one site its everywhere! And I need to see the real speed of what the gif is or else I won't know if its wrong or not. So what do I do?

Same problem here, very frustrating. The same thing also happens on my MacBook with Tiger. The longer the animated GIF is, the more it slows down. Here's a good example, fine in Firefox but not Safari: http://content.ytmnd.com/content/6/a/0/6a0e42120c9f9e24dfc3bfa353ccd114.gif
I submitted this as a Safari bug a while ago, I hope all of you will too.

RENTED MOVIE PLAYING TOO SLOW

hi All,
After several million hours (well 3.5) spent downloading a movie (Domestic Disturbance) I play it only to find it is playing very slow and the actions don't match the audio. It is really irritating and impossible to watch. I tried cleaning out my computer to free up space to no avail.
I then put the movie on my external hard drive to play on my other better laptop but when I opened it it would not let me play it saying it was authorized to play on another device...grr
Any advice anyone????

ANYONE?????

Bridge CS3 Previews/Slideshow Scaling Too Slow on Powerbook G4 15"

I've been using Photoshop CS3 itself for months and it's plenty fast. Bridge, on the other hand, is unusable for me right now because when I click an 6-megapixel jpeg image, a fuzzy/blotchy preview showed immediately, but it takes a full seven seconds for a high-quality preview to show. The exact same thing occurs in the slideshow mode. Of course, once the high-quality preview has been cached, it shows up instantly, but this is a real issue for newly-viewed files.
Is this a known issue? If so, is there a way to make the high-quality preview reasonably fast, so that there's only a delay of a second or two max?
Graphic Converter is quite snappy for previews and full-screen slideshows on this ~1.6 Ghz G4, but I would prefer to use Bridge for its advanced organizing features and integration with Photoshop.
Thank you for your help,
Cameron

>It makes no difference whether your files originated as 10- or 12-megapixel digital camera files or as 120 MB 16-bit Tiff scans, 4,000 images are still 4,000 images!
 
 Actually, no. How files originate makes
 b all
 the difference!
 
 E.g. a film scan is by definition very slow, so processing, sorting, culling, stacking all occur prior to a few hero images being selected for scanning. Those activities occur manually rather than in software.
 
 Similarly - again with no disrespect intended - your 4000 images captured over weeks on a slow digicam with a film-centric mindset are
 b nothing
 like capturing hundreds or thousands of shots, many of
 i dynamic subjects,
 during intense DSLR RAW shooting of a day or two.
 
 E.g. the other day I was alone (meaning no helper to control the feisty new pup) walking my new lab puppy during failing light and decided to shoot a pic for emailing to friends. I would run away from the puppy, turn around and shoot continuous high speed autofocus pix of Ruby as she ran toward me. Even though Ruby can run almost as fast as I can, in 5 minutes of failing light I had shot 50-100 12 MP RAW images that then needed to be keyworded, stacked, stacks reviewed for ranking and culls, and an email generated.
 
 
<a href="http://www.pixentral.com/show.php?picture=1ybNMDLvrZ84DrWBMZ0a5QE8fKUkY" /></a>
<img alt="Picture hosted by Pixentral" src="http://www.pixentral.com/hosted/1ybNMDLvrZ84DrWBMZ0a5QE8fKUkY_thumb.jpg" border="0" />
 Nikon D2x, f/4, 85mm.
 
 The whole process was easy and fast. With a low end point-and-shoot in failing light I would not have had 50 properly exposed, properly focused naturally lit pix that needed close comparative evaluation. At best one would end up with one or two focused keepers; no fancy software necessary to cull a dozen out-of-focus pix.
 
 My point is simply that folks who are evolving into DSLR workflows, especially those of dynamic subjects like people (with constantly changing expressions that are well suited to shooting stacks of quick image captures), should beef up their hardware, buy the Aperture tutorial/CD, download the Aperture and/or LR trials and check out a modern workflow.

Audio track in movie plays too slow

Only when I play it on my iPod touch after converting it like all of my other movies, the audio lags behind. But when I watch the converted file on my computer, it's up to speed. Any solutions? Both my iTunes and iOS are up to date. I have an iPod Touch 4G 32GB. And I use Xilisoft video converter. Thanks.

If the film has different audio options then you should get a speech bubble icon on the left-hand end playback controls on it : http://support.apple.com/kb/HT5562
e.g.

I just brought a brand new Macbook pro retina display, when i connect it to my apple tv through airplay its too slow and when it try to play a movie apply tv is always a minute or 2 behind. How can i fix this?

I just brought a brand new Macbook pro retina display, when i connect it to my apple tv through airplay its too slow and when it try to play a movie apply tv is always a minute or 2 behind. How can i fix this?

Hello HanaAmer1,
We've an article which provides troubleshooting steps that can help get AirPlay workign correctly.
iTunes: Troubleshooting AirPlay and AirPlay Mirroring
http://support.apple.com/kb/TS5209
Cheers,
Allen

What can be done to correct slow video or freezing in Adobe Premiere Elements 12? Sound plays fine but the video is too slow to even start a project.

Sound plays fine but the video is too slow to even start a project.

film78
On what computer operating system is your Premiere Elements 12 running on? Have you updated 12 to 12.1 yet? If not, please do so by using an opened project's Help Menu/Update.
Not enough information in order to help you.
Looking for
1. Properties of source media (including file extension and brand/model/settings of camera that recorded the video).
2. Is problem restricted to one particular file in one particular project? What happens if you start a new project? What is the
duration and size of the project when performance is slow and freezing sets in? What are you doing in the program when this happens?
3. Using a pen and tablet device instead of a mouse?
4. Does problem exist if antivirus and firewall(s) are disabled?
5. Please describe computer environment, including dating on video card/graphics card driver version. Did you install the program to the
default Local Disk C? Where are the Scratch Disks directed and how much free space there?
Lots more questions, but let us start here and then decide what next based on your reply.
Thank you.
ATR

My iPod nano 6G stop working suddenly; After i reset it and even afetr put it in "stand by" mode by accessing deagnostic mode, it is still not working; Now i can access it sometimes (the main screen), but is not playing and is too slow. How can i fix it

My iPod nano 6G stop working suddenly; After i reset it and even afetr put it in "stand by" mode by accessing deagnostic mode, it is still not working; Now i can access it sometimes (the main screen), but is not playing and is too slow. How can i fix it

If you do not find a solution in the iPod nano (6th generation) - User Guide, suggest that you call AppleCare if still under warranty or take a trip to your local Apple Store or AASP.

Imported audo plays back too slow

I dragged and dropped a 48k wav file into GB and it played back slow. Is GB set to 44.1? Do I need to convert it 44.1k?

you have been SO HELPFUL ! thanks !! we need more people like you.
so you are saying i can render out an .flv file and just rename the extension to .swf ?? would this be a smaller file ? i cant seem to get the .swf file smaller than 56 megs out of after effects, the only way would be to make the actual size (600x336) smaller....but this would make the animation too small on the screen....and i like the size of it now. i will try the .flv thing tonight.
the firefox thing fixed itself. this morning when i tried it, it played the flash file. slowly and sluggishly, like safari, but it played it back. so maybe it had to update ? dont know....not sure. thanks again....and let me know about renaming the file...can i just change the extension ?
thanks a million!!
B

Itunes playing songs too slow

Itunes started playing everything slow (about a tone down)
Closed it and restarted logic, checked tempos there - all good
Closed that reopened itunes and everything back to right speed!
Bit scary, anyone got a clue?
Ta

iTunes has a habit of doing this when you encode source files with high sample rates (i.e. 48,000 khz) to a standard sample rate of 44,100 kHz.

Please Help! All Sounds in Classic are too slow now!

Something dreadful happened (wish I knew what) and now every sound that is played back by any Classic application is about 70% too slow.
No matter if it is a Classic game like Unreal (I), Deus Ex, AvP for OS9 (the OSX version works fine), or Quicktime 6, or any other given Classic application. The only sounds that appear normal are the Platinum system sounds.
I don't know which files affect Classic sound playback or where they are located. Can't imagine what could cause that particular problem.
Hope someone could help...
Many thanks in advance
M:A:
PowerMac G5 2x2 GHz Mac OS X (10.4.6) 1.5 GB RAM, standard sound card (TI-TAS3004)
PowerMac G5 2x2

Sorry, didnt get an email notification, so I just checked the thread.
Starting and quitting Garage Band actually helped!
(Imagine listening to the meaningful dialogues in "Deus Ex" spoken with Sesame Street's Cookie Monster voice. Aaaaannnd reeealllly sllloowwww. Doesn't quite capture the mood...)
Do you have an explanation why Garage Band should affect Classic sound output?
Thanks a lot,
Martin

No Audio Playback due to Error Message "Disk is too slow. (Prepare) (-10001)"

Out of the blue, no audio playback. Was working just fine earlier today.
I repeatedly get the error message:
Disk is too slow. (Prepare)
(-10001)
NOTE: I have more than enough disc space. That is NOT the issue.
I also just got a second error message:
Part of the Project was not played
This project has too many real instrument tracks to be played in real-time. To optimize performance, see the 'Optimizing GarageBand performance' page in GarageBand Help.
NOTE: Odd as I have only 2 tracks in the GarageBand file.
Any others experience this? Suggestions?

Have a look into the Preferences folder (YourUserFolder/Libraries/Preferences/) and trash all Logic preferences.
You'll have to setup the program again.
cheers
rob

Built In application "YouTube" Is Way too slow!

Hey guys, I'm new here btw, so hi to all.
When i watch videos on youtube built in app IT TAKES FOREVER! to buffer the videos, I'm using WI-FI and my net connection is 20mb, I would love to use it but it just takes toooooo long to buffer it would take me 4-5 minute to watch a one minute clip, Any help you'll be my new idol!
The strange this is though, on my computer they load in literally seconds if not instantly are are completely buffered in under 5 seconds for almost any video, yet i could hardly watch a 2 minute youtube video, it buffers then 20 seconds later it stops and it won't supering buffer, i press play nothing happens, it just like it either WAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY too slow or it stops buffering completely, all i know is with youtube being such a big feature, it is almost useless by the terrible coding, or what ever the problem is to make it soo slow, i hear so much people talking about youtube and there iphone but mine is just too painfully slow to watch(and no 100% not my connection)

Is there any youtube settings??? Can any setting be changed which relate to youtube? And is it possible to watch youtube through safari and not through the standard application?
NO, there are no settings. Flash will not play in Safari yet, but there is a workaround using VideoHamster.
Here are a couple of Flash YouTube videos on my server that I converted to QT with CosmoPod. How do they load for you? I have a 1M up cable connection. They should start loading and playing after a few seconds. YouTube videos start playing after about 5 seconds on mine.
http://bmer.servemp3.com/test/
Dave M.
MacOSG Founder/Ambassador  An Apple User Group  iTunes: MacOSG Podcast
Creator of 'Mac611 - Mobile Mac Support' (designed exclusively for an iPhone/iPod touch)

Bumblebee performance is too slow

Hi everyone,
This is my second post in this forum and it has been only 2 days that I met Arch. Before, I was using Ubuntu for 3 years, but due to low performance in my PC, unfortunately, I decided to say good bye which was hard to say.
Now, I am trying to have the same setup as my previous laptop and Bumblebee was one of them. I followed the instructions here: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Bumblebee.
It seems that bumblebee is installed and working, however, the FPS is too slow:
$ optirun glxspheres64 -info
Polygons in scene: 62464
Visual ID of window: 0x20
Context is Direct
OpenGL Renderer: GeForce GT 520MX/PCIe/SSE2
0.023848 frames/sec - 0.021114 Mpixels/sec
Without optirun I get:
$ glxspheres64 -info
Polygons in scene: 62464
Visual ID of window: 0x20
Context is Direct
OpenGL Renderer: Mesa DRI Intel(R) Sandybridge Mobile
0.033237 frames/sec - 0.029426 Mpixels/sec
0.029968 frames/sec - 0.026533 Mpixels/sec
This is impossible as I was getting very good results before.
I am wondering if I did something wrong, or missed anything.
Just for information, system specs:
Intel i7 2670QM 2.2 GHZ
4 GB RAM
1 GB GeForce GT 520MX
512 MB Intel Graphics
I played 0ad with and without optirun and the performance was good in both of them, but not sure if it switches the video cards itself.
I also have bbswitch installed.
Any help would be appreciated. Thank you.
Last edited by wakeup12 (2014-09-27 14:29:19)

Hello,
Can you please explain in a little more detail the scenario you testing? Are you comparing a SQL Database in Europe against a SQL Database in India? Or a SQL Database with a local, on-premise SQL Server installation?
In case of the first scenario, the roundtrip latency for the connection to the datacenter might play a role.
If you are comparing to a local installation, please note that you might be running against completely different hardware specifications and without network delay, resulting in very different results.
In both cases you can use the below blog post to assess the resource utilization of the SQL Database during the operation:
http://azure.microsoft.com/blog/2014/09/11/azure-sql-database-introduces-new-near-real-time-performance-metrics/
If the DB utilizes up to 100% you might have to consider to upgrade to a higher performance level to achieve the throughput you are looking for.
Thanks,
Jan

Performance is too slow on SQL Azure box

Hi,
Performance is too slow on SQL Azure box (Located in Europe)
Below query returns 500,000 rows in 18 Min. on SQL Azure box (connected via SSMS, located in India)
SELECT * FROM TABLE_1
Whereas, on local server it returns 500,000 rows in (30 sec.)
SQL Azure configuration:
Service Tier/Performance Level : Premium/P1
DTU       : 100
MAX DB Size : 500GB
Max Worker Threads : 200
Max Sessions     : 2400
Benchmark Transaction Rate      : 105 transactions per second
Predictability : Best
Any suggestion would be highly appreciated.
Thanks,

Hello,
Can you please explain in a little more detail the scenario you testing? Are you comparing a SQL Database in Europe against a SQL Database in India? Or a SQL Database with a local, on-premise SQL Server installation?
In case of the first scenario, the roundtrip latency for the connection to the datacenter might play a role.
If you are comparing to a local installation, please note that you might be running against completely different hardware specifications and without network delay, resulting in very different results.
In both cases you can use the below blog post to assess the resource utilization of the SQL Database during the operation:
http://azure.microsoft.com/blog/2014/09/11/azure-sql-database-introduces-new-near-real-time-performance-metrics/
If the DB utilizes up to 100% you might have to consider to upgrade to a higher performance level to achieve the throughput you are looking for.
Thanks,
Jan

Slideshow plays too slow

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for