SLOC control

Hi,
I am trying to test the SLOC control in sandbox  but its not generating the PCN even if the TO gets confirmed for the goods recieved from the storgae type 902.
details of org structure:  WM 100 assigned to sloc 1 (good reciept area) & 2 (Picking area). These 2 sloc belongs to same plant.
Config settings:1 ) sloc 1 is marked as do not copy in TR. sloc 2 is marked as Standard sloc in config.
                         2 ) Plant + WM + storage type 902 + sloc 1 are assigned to the movement type 311.  and no combine PCN check box is marked in the config which means PCN should get generated and should immedeatly get converted to TO.
I have also tried to run tcode LQ01 but then I get the error message that system is not able to determine the movement type.
let me know if more info is required on this.

Flow of goods
gr done with reference to PO agaisnt movement type 101 and the sloc mentioned here is 1>>Goods are shown in storage area 902 but in TR there is no sloc as in config I have marked sloc 1not be copied in TR>>>Creating TO w.r.to this TR and the sloc comes here is sloc 2 as I have marked this one as standard sloc in the config.>> I confirm the TO and goods are shown in sloc 2
point to note here is at the time of GR the sloc mentioned was 1 but now the goods are transfered to sloc 2 within WM and as result the IM has be in sync. So the PCN should get genrated but this is what is not happening.
let me know if more info is required on this

Similar Messages

  • How to control inspection type 08 to trigger on only one SLOC

    Hi Experts,
    We are currently using movement type 311 to transfer materials from SLOC to SLOC that do not need QI for about 5 years now. But for some business reasons. We need to activate inspection type 08 on all of our materials. But by doing this we will trigger inspection lot creations on STO on materials that do not need QI. We do not want to ruin the normal business processes and re-train people on what movement type to use.
    What we want to do is create an SLOC wherein even if we are using 311 it will automatically generate an ILot once it is placed on the specific SLOC. I think SAP has a user exit for this.
    Thank you for the help.
    Eva

    either
    copy mvt type 311 ot Z11
    for more details
    Inspection lot for stock transfer
    or
    Use user exit :QAAT0001
    Refer for more details
    Restrict Inspection Lot Creation

  • WM Storage Location control problem - no TR created in receiving warehouse

    Hi all,
    I have configured the system to perform a 311 mvt from sloc 4002 to sloc 0010. Both Slocs have different warehouse numbers assigned.
    The transfer is working fine, however in the receiving warehouse no TR is being generated even though I am using the standard *** 311 movement type which has create TR flag set.
    If I disable the config and perform the 311 in MIGO after confirming the TR in the sending warehouse, the stock is moved to the new warehouse and a TR is created.
    Has anyone experienced this before?
    Mark

    2nd entry in storage location control is ZF2 501 DE01 0010 311 
    1st case:The entry.e. ZF2 501 DE01 0010 311  seems to be wrong.
    Your warehouse storage location 0010 is managed with ZF4 and not ZF2.
    But in this case, the way you created entries concludes that you want to transfer the stock from one Sloc to other Sloc which have separate warehouses.
    i feel your approach to excute this scenario seems to be not a valid one. I don't understand why you are running this process as WM transaction followed by IM document. You said that you are creating the transfer order first.. must be with wm mvt 311 in LT01. Standard WM mvt 311 doesn't allows manual TO creation.Your both storage locations are assigned to different warehouses. You should post the movement in IM first, then follow the WM activities.
    2nd case:If you say that ZF2 is correct, then your storage location is wrong, it should be  4002 instead of 0010  and you are transferring stock from one storage type to other storage within same warehouse.
    If you want to do this scenarion as WM followed by IM, then please change the Wm mvt 311 in ZF2 to allow manual TO creation.
    In movement type properties, set the destination storage type as 501.
    Strorage location control should be ZF2 501 DE01 4002 311
    Please let me know your thoughts on this.
    Regards,
    Santosh

  • Question about sloc determination in MFBF and backflush in REM

    Dear SAPper,
    I just try to read about Repetitive Manufacturing and i came with some confused item.
    1. I try to backflush MFBF and i don;t fill the planned order, but the backflush is succedd. Something
    strange is my planned order is not decrease:(, so do i have to fill planned order number every time i backflush. Can i backflush anonymous to planned order number and the system derease the planned order automatically in FIFO manner
    2. I configure the auto sloc determination and i have set maximum number of split unlimitted.
    for example in MFBF i need 50 PC Raw Material
    My stock in SLoc 1000 is 40 PCS
    My stock in SLoc 2000 is 200 PCS
    I configure the sloc determination like this
    1. F 1000
    2. F 2000
    Nut in MFBF component always withdraw from 2000 with 50 (full quantity) although i set maximum number of split maximum
    I tried batch determination before and it split.
    Did i miss something so the system can split the quantity along sloc automatically
    Please throw a light:D
    Best regards,
    Freddy Ha

    Hi,
    1)
    Normally in the rem for backflush just u have to enter the product and qty then system will automatically reduces the planned order.
    But in situation if planned order is not reducing then please check ur REM profile in the "control data2" tab
    In this which one u have select for the planned order reduction.
    2)
    Regarding stock determination, create stock determination rule thr' T CODE:OXPS.
    Here u have to create stock determination rule first from which storage location material should be picked, depending upon the priority.
    Assign this stock determination rule in the material master or in the REM profile "Control data2 " tab.
    Then system will automatically pick the material depending upon the stock determination rule.
    Regards
    Vijay

  • Authorization Control for Physical Inventory Transactions

    Hello,
    Can we control the authorization for Physical Inventory Transactions especially MI01, MI02, Mi04, MI07, MI08, MI31 etc. at Storage Location level instead of Plant Level.
    If it's not possible at Sloc level does anyone knows the user exit/code we can use enable the authorization check at Storage Location level.
    Regards,

    hi,
    yes u can do it.
    check
    M_MSEG_LGO     Goods Movements: Storage Location
    mvt type 701/702

  • Confirmation control in PO

    Hi folks,
    While PO creation, the confirmation control key set up can be controlled by
    a. Vendor (Purchasing view).
    b. Info Record
    c. Scheduling agreement.
    At all the above locations, I havent done any settings for confirmation control i.e the confirmation control key is blank. However I get a confirmation control (Z001) whenever I create a PO.
    Anything else need to be checked?
    Regards

    HI,
    Please check at the following node the existence of conf ctrl for a combination of Doc Cagegroy + Order type + Plant + Sloc.
    SPRO > Logistics Execution > Shipping > Deliveries > Define Order confirmations for Inbound Deliveries.
    Thanks

  • "Inbound deliveries for PO reciepts with confirmation control keys"

    Hi Gurus,
    Can somebody tell me the detailed configuaration steps " Inbound deliveries for PO reciepts with confirmation control keys".
    Thanks
    Raj

    Hi,
    Del. type is identified in
    OLME-Confirmations-Define Internal Confirmation Categories
    Del. item catogery is defined in TCode 0184.
    Based on Del. type & item cat. grp in Material master
    Goods Recieving point (shipping point) against Plant & SLOC is defined in
    Logistics Execution-Shipping-Basic Shipping Functions-Shipping Point and Goods Receiving Point Determination-Assign Goods Receiving Points for Inbound Deliveries

  • Inspection lot shouldn't create for Transfer posting(311) sloc specific

    Dear Expert,
    i need expert advice on this issue.
    here specific to one plant when user is doing transfer posting through movement type 311, user doesn't want inspection lot (specific to storage locations ).
    Here specific to that Material quality is active. and business want quality active for other all plants.
    i tried the T code OMJJ, if i deactive the quality here than this will applicable to all plants.
    here v can deactive the quality at plant level through Material Master but here business wants to restrict at sloc level only.
    b'coz if v deactive at plant level than quality will skip at the time of GR.
    so how we can control the inspection lot creation for movement type ( 311 ) and storage location combination.?
    pl. guide me on this
    Thanks
    h shah

    Thanks a lot

  • HU - inbound delivery in HU managed Sloc at IM level after GR from prod.

    hi experts ,
    we do GR of process order in HU Sloc .   so inbound delivery is created after 101 movement . i want auto packing & GR of inbound delivery in back ground w/o manual intervention :
    requirement is :
    1. i want to do auto packing . we can have that setting at client level for inbound delivery type if we maintain the correct master
       data . But i want to restrict this auto packing to particular plant & Sloc and this should not affect other plants.
       2. once auto packing is done auto GR should be made of thr inbound delivery . which FM or Bapi shall i use for this?
    or any other way to do it ?
    please guide me on this.
    regards ,
    satish

    requirement is :
    1. i want to do auto packing . we can have that setting at client level for inbound delivery type if we maintain the correct master
    data . But i want to restrict this auto packing to particular plant & Sloc and this should not affect other plants.
    Check in Packing routine 112 are you able to control automatic packing plant wise.I hofe this can work
    2. once auto packing is done auto GR should be made of thr inbound delivery . which FM or Bapi shall i use for this?
    or any other way to do it ?
    You can setup VL06I batch job to do PGR automatically.
    Edited by: Sridhar Jayavarapu on Mar 2, 2012 2:37 PM

  • Storage location control, storage location ref.

    Hello all,
    I am new in WM,
    Can anyone please explain me the  *_Storage location control function_*  and *Storage location ref* with the exmple in detail.
    Go for this path if required:-
    Spro-- log execution-- warehouse mang- interfaces inventory mang-- Define storage location control..
    Please help me...
    Abhinay Waikar.

    Hi,
    I;'ve used it for the following:
    Standard inbound deliveries to be received in storage location 1000. After finishing the TO in WM, the material is transferred from SLOC 1000 to 1010. In the sales orders, 1010 is taken into account and 1000 is disregarded. I.e. stock in 1000 is not seen as available.
    In this case available stock is indeed available, also in WM.
    MdZ

  • Mvt type-move cust consignment to QI in plant sloc in consignment pick up

    Hi,
    For this matter, I cannot use standard mvt 632 because the stock will go to Un-restricted in plant Sloc.Can anybody suggest to use which mov? or perhaps how to create new movement type?
    Thank you.

    Dear zmisnomer
    This can be easily addressed.  Instead of changing the movement type, you retain the same and can be controlled through material master.
    Go to material master, select "Quality Management" view and "Insp.setup".  Choose "Inspection types" and assign "06" and select the key "Active".
    Now whenever you create any returns, by default, it will go to qualtiy whether it be consignment returns or customer returns.
    Thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Query for MAP Calculation - Price Control ind V and S

    SAP Guru's
    Query regarding MAP Calculation Logic
    Scenario:
    *I have one material xyz
    1. It is split valuated material,
    2. Two valuation types with diff price control indicators
    3. Batch Management is also activated on this material.*
    Follwoing is the Material Master Accounting1 View :
    Vauation Type     Price Control     Total Value     Qty     MAP                  Batch     
         ZA1          V                     610835.00             37     16509.05(V)          01
         ZB1          S                     0                  1     20000.00(S)          02
    but when we are running MM03 w/o Valuation Type Accounting 1 View
    is showing MAP as 16074.60 i.e. 610835.00/38
    Diff. Reports Output------>
    MB5L - List of Stock Values: Balances --> Output
    ValArea          Total Stock          Total Value
    A101               1                          0
    A101               37                          610835.00
    Net-->               38                  610835.00
    MB52 - Display Warehouse Stocks
    Check Box - Display Batch Stocks
    Condition1: When Display Batch Stocks is selected on main screen of MB52
    Mat.     Palnt      Sloc      Unrestricted     Stck in Transit          Total Value
    xyz     A101     0010      0                    30                       482238.00
    XYZ     A101     0010      7                    0                       115563.00
    xyz     A101     0010      1                    0                        0
    This is not correct result as Total Values is 597801.00 only      
    Condition2: When Display Batch Stocks is not selected on main screen of MB52
    Mat.     Palnt     Sloc     Unrestricted     Stck in Transit          Total Value
    xyz     A101     0010         0                  30                       482238.00
    XYZ     A101     0010         8                   0                       128597.00
    This is correct result as Total Values is 610835 .00 only
    So my query on above issue is :
    1. How System is including 1 Qty of Std Price Control for MAP calculation?
    As per my understanding MAP is only for Price Control V indicator Materials Stock
    2. Whats the difference between these two report output from MM03 Accounting
       view?
    Thanks

    hi Animesh,
    For Split Valuated Material at header level Price control is always "V" i.e. Moving average price reagrdless of the Price control you have given for different valuation types.
    Due to this you are getting these kind of results. Please visit the following link for more information
    http:///saphelp/EN/8f/d1de34e4cb2300e10000009b38f83b/frameset.htm
    Check it and revert back.
    Regards,
    Jay
    Edited by: SAP_MM on Dec 4, 2008 10:19 AM

  • Define Control Storage Loc error LT206

    Hi guru´s
    I went to config 'Table for storage location control' and tried entering a storage location but I'm getting an error message: LT206: Based on SType control, stor loc XXX is unsuitable for stor loc control.
    path
    Logistic Execution> Warehouse Management > Data Master> Define Control Storage Loc
    What config is necessary for this case? Appreciate any help on this matter. I don´t understand why a can´t for this combination the error message appear.
    that the type of storage is storage block has something to do?
    Thank you in advance.
    regards
    Vasco

    Hello Vasco,
    you would use Stor. Location Control when you want to direct materials to different Storage location base on the movement types within a same Plant or warehouse. Check if you have maintained the right combination of the movement type and Sloc .
    thanks,
    Edited by: Ganesh Prabhakar C on Dec 14, 2010 1:04 PM

  • Issue in creation of control cycle

    Dear Gurus,
    During creation of control cycle (LPK1), the fields for source information is not appearing in my system.
    I compared control cycle in a different ECC system where source information is appearing.
    How can make the screen appear in my ECC system.
    Please find the screenshots.
    Any pointers will be highly appreciated.
    This thread is further to the threads in Production Planning and LE/WM Forum. I could not resolve the issue with the threads.
    Hope that I will get any pointer in EWM forum.
    http://scn.sap.com/thread/3609441
    http://scn.sap.com/thread/3610822
    With Regards,
    Malay

    Hello Malay,
    Can first contact your ABAPer and ensure the bottom screen is not an Screen Enhancement?
    If it is a some custom development, your ABAPer can help you on the logic behind it.
    Else, Let us know.
    Regards,
    Sathish

  • IF-statement in Personas that is checking if control is inactive?

    Hi,
    I have this simple script in screen personas that is clicking the option: "Attachment list". Everything is working great if there is attachments.
    If there are no attachments the option is "inactive" or "greyed out". This will result in a script error.
    I thought this was going to be an easy fix by adding IF statement to the the script. But howerver I specify the critera for the IF statement the script will always try to click the Attachment list. The condition will simply always be TRUE.
    Am I missing something here or is it not possible at this time to script an IF statement that is checking if the control is inactive or similar?
    Best Regards,
    Oskar Söderlund

    There is another way, but it will get a little tricky.
    Outside of the transaction IE03 you can check for the existence of attachments for a piece of equipment by looking in table SRGBTBREL. Field TYPEID_A will be "EQUI" and field INSTID_A will be the equipment number, zero-padded on the left to 18 characters long. Use SE16 to look in the table and you'll get the idea.
    You could wrap this test in an RFC-enabled ABAP function and call that from your Personas script button. Use the return value from that RFC to decide if attachments exist or not and how the script should respond. Details for how to write such an RFC and call it from a Personas script are in this blog: Calling RFCs from a Personas script.
    Like I said, this isn't straightforward and perhaps Personas scripting should include an active/inactive test in addition to the exists/doesn't exist test. Until then, however, there is a way if you don't mind a bit of ABAP programming.

Maybe you are looking for