SLOC control
Hi,
I am trying to test the SLOC control in sandbox but its not generating the PCN even if the TO gets confirmed for the goods recieved from the storgae type 902.
details of org structure: WM 100 assigned to sloc 1 (good reciept area) & 2 (Picking area). These 2 sloc belongs to same plant.
Config settings:1 ) sloc 1 is marked as do not copy in TR. sloc 2 is marked as Standard sloc in config.
2 ) Plant + WM + storage type 902 + sloc 1 are assigned to the movement type 311. and no combine PCN check box is marked in the config which means PCN should get generated and should immedeatly get converted to TO.
I have also tried to run tcode LQ01 but then I get the error message that system is not able to determine the movement type.
let me know if more info is required on this.
Flow of goods
gr done with reference to PO agaisnt movement type 101 and the sloc mentioned here is 1>>Goods are shown in storage area 902 but in TR there is no sloc as in config I have marked sloc 1not be copied in TR>>>Creating TO w.r.to this TR and the sloc comes here is sloc 2 as I have marked this one as standard sloc in the config.>> I confirm the TO and goods are shown in sloc 2
point to note here is at the time of GR the sloc mentioned was 1 but now the goods are transfered to sloc 2 within WM and as result the IM has be in sync. So the PCN should get genrated but this is what is not happening.
let me know if more info is required on this
Similar Messages
-
How to control inspection type 08 to trigger on only one SLOC
Hi Experts,
We are currently using movement type 311 to transfer materials from SLOC to SLOC that do not need QI for about 5 years now. But for some business reasons. We need to activate inspection type 08 on all of our materials. But by doing this we will trigger inspection lot creations on STO on materials that do not need QI. We do not want to ruin the normal business processes and re-train people on what movement type to use.
What we want to do is create an SLOC wherein even if we are using 311 it will automatically generate an ILot once it is placed on the specific SLOC. I think SAP has a user exit for this.
Thank you for the help.
Evaeither
copy mvt type 311 ot Z11
for more details
Inspection lot for stock transfer
or
Use user exit :QAAT0001
Refer for more details
Restrict Inspection Lot Creation -
WM Storage Location control problem - no TR created in receiving warehouse
Hi all,
I have configured the system to perform a 311 mvt from sloc 4002 to sloc 0010. Both Slocs have different warehouse numbers assigned.
The transfer is working fine, however in the receiving warehouse no TR is being generated even though I am using the standard *** 311 movement type which has create TR flag set.
If I disable the config and perform the 311 in MIGO after confirming the TR in the sending warehouse, the stock is moved to the new warehouse and a TR is created.
Has anyone experienced this before?
Mark2nd entry in storage location control is ZF2 501 DE01 0010 311
1st case:The entry.e. ZF2 501 DE01 0010 311 seems to be wrong.
Your warehouse storage location 0010 is managed with ZF4 and not ZF2.
But in this case, the way you created entries concludes that you want to transfer the stock from one Sloc to other Sloc which have separate warehouses.
i feel your approach to excute this scenario seems to be not a valid one. I don't understand why you are running this process as WM transaction followed by IM document. You said that you are creating the transfer order first.. must be with wm mvt 311 in LT01. Standard WM mvt 311 doesn't allows manual TO creation.Your both storage locations are assigned to different warehouses. You should post the movement in IM first, then follow the WM activities.
2nd case:If you say that ZF2 is correct, then your storage location is wrong, it should be 4002 instead of 0010 and you are transferring stock from one storage type to other storage within same warehouse.
If you want to do this scenarion as WM followed by IM, then please change the Wm mvt 311 in ZF2 to allow manual TO creation.
In movement type properties, set the destination storage type as 501.
Strorage location control should be ZF2 501 DE01 4002 311
Please let me know your thoughts on this.
Regards,
Santosh -
Question about sloc determination in MFBF and backflush in REM
Dear SAPper,
I just try to read about Repetitive Manufacturing and i came with some confused item.
1. I try to backflush MFBF and i don;t fill the planned order, but the backflush is succedd. Something
strange is my planned order is not decrease:(, so do i have to fill planned order number every time i backflush. Can i backflush anonymous to planned order number and the system derease the planned order automatically in FIFO manner
2. I configure the auto sloc determination and i have set maximum number of split unlimitted.
for example in MFBF i need 50 PC Raw Material
My stock in SLoc 1000 is 40 PCS
My stock in SLoc 2000 is 200 PCS
I configure the sloc determination like this
1. F 1000
2. F 2000
Nut in MFBF component always withdraw from 2000 with 50 (full quantity) although i set maximum number of split maximum
I tried batch determination before and it split.
Did i miss something so the system can split the quantity along sloc automatically
Please throw a light:D
Best regards,
Freddy HaHi,
1)
Normally in the rem for backflush just u have to enter the product and qty then system will automatically reduces the planned order.
But in situation if planned order is not reducing then please check ur REM profile in the "control data2" tab
In this which one u have select for the planned order reduction.
2)
Regarding stock determination, create stock determination rule thr' T CODE:OXPS.
Here u have to create stock determination rule first from which storage location material should be picked, depending upon the priority.
Assign this stock determination rule in the material master or in the REM profile "Control data2 " tab.
Then system will automatically pick the material depending upon the stock determination rule.
Regards
Vijay -
Authorization Control for Physical Inventory Transactions
Hello,
Can we control the authorization for Physical Inventory Transactions especially MI01, MI02, Mi04, MI07, MI08, MI31 etc. at Storage Location level instead of Plant Level.
If it's not possible at Sloc level does anyone knows the user exit/code we can use enable the authorization check at Storage Location level.
Regards,hi,
yes u can do it.
check
M_MSEG_LGO Goods Movements: Storage Location
mvt type 701/702 -
Hi folks,
While PO creation, the confirmation control key set up can be controlled by
a. Vendor (Purchasing view).
b. Info Record
c. Scheduling agreement.
At all the above locations, I havent done any settings for confirmation control i.e the confirmation control key is blank. However I get a confirmation control (Z001) whenever I create a PO.
Anything else need to be checked?
RegardsHI,
Please check at the following node the existence of conf ctrl for a combination of Doc Cagegroy + Order type + Plant + Sloc.
SPRO > Logistics Execution > Shipping > Deliveries > Define Order confirmations for Inbound Deliveries.
Thanks -
"Inbound deliveries for PO reciepts with confirmation control keys"
Hi Gurus,
Can somebody tell me the detailed configuaration steps " Inbound deliveries for PO reciepts with confirmation control keys".
Thanks
RajHi,
Del. type is identified in
OLME-Confirmations-Define Internal Confirmation Categories
Del. item catogery is defined in TCode 0184.
Based on Del. type & item cat. grp in Material master
Goods Recieving point (shipping point) against Plant & SLOC is defined in
Logistics Execution-Shipping-Basic Shipping Functions-Shipping Point and Goods Receiving Point Determination-Assign Goods Receiving Points for Inbound Deliveries -
Inspection lot shouldn't create for Transfer posting(311) sloc specific
Dear Expert,
i need expert advice on this issue.
here specific to one plant when user is doing transfer posting through movement type 311, user doesn't want inspection lot (specific to storage locations ).
Here specific to that Material quality is active. and business want quality active for other all plants.
i tried the T code OMJJ, if i deactive the quality here than this will applicable to all plants.
here v can deactive the quality at plant level through Material Master but here business wants to restrict at sloc level only.
b'coz if v deactive at plant level than quality will skip at the time of GR.
so how we can control the inspection lot creation for movement type ( 311 ) and storage location combination.?
pl. guide me on this
Thanks
h shahThanks a lot
-
HU - inbound delivery in HU managed Sloc at IM level after GR from prod.
hi experts ,
we do GR of process order in HU Sloc . so inbound delivery is created after 101 movement . i want auto packing & GR of inbound delivery in back ground w/o manual intervention :
requirement is :
1. i want to do auto packing . we can have that setting at client level for inbound delivery type if we maintain the correct master
data . But i want to restrict this auto packing to particular plant & Sloc and this should not affect other plants.
2. once auto packing is done auto GR should be made of thr inbound delivery . which FM or Bapi shall i use for this?
or any other way to do it ?
please guide me on this.
regards ,
satishrequirement is :
1. i want to do auto packing . we can have that setting at client level for inbound delivery type if we maintain the correct master
data . But i want to restrict this auto packing to particular plant & Sloc and this should not affect other plants.
Check in Packing routine 112 are you able to control automatic packing plant wise.I hofe this can work
2. once auto packing is done auto GR should be made of thr inbound delivery . which FM or Bapi shall i use for this?
or any other way to do it ?
You can setup VL06I batch job to do PGR automatically.
Edited by: Sridhar Jayavarapu on Mar 2, 2012 2:37 PM -
Storage location control, storage location ref.
Hello all,
I am new in WM,
Can anyone please explain me the *_Storage location control function_* and *Storage location ref* with the exmple in detail.
Go for this path if required:-
Spro-- log execution-- warehouse mang- interfaces inventory mang-- Define storage location control..
Please help me...
Abhinay Waikar.Hi,
I;'ve used it for the following:
Standard inbound deliveries to be received in storage location 1000. After finishing the TO in WM, the material is transferred from SLOC 1000 to 1010. In the sales orders, 1010 is taken into account and 1000 is disregarded. I.e. stock in 1000 is not seen as available.
In this case available stock is indeed available, also in WM.
MdZ -
Mvt type-move cust consignment to QI in plant sloc in consignment pick up
Hi,
For this matter, I cannot use standard mvt 632 because the stock will go to Un-restricted in plant Sloc.Can anybody suggest to use which mov? or perhaps how to create new movement type?
Thank you.Dear zmisnomer
This can be easily addressed. Instead of changing the movement type, you retain the same and can be controlled through material master.
Go to material master, select "Quality Management" view and "Insp.setup". Choose "Inspection types" and assign "06" and select the key "Active".
Now whenever you create any returns, by default, it will go to qualtiy whether it be consignment returns or customer returns.
Thanks
G. Lakshmipathi -
Query for MAP Calculation - Price Control ind V and S
SAP Guru's
Query regarding MAP Calculation Logic
Scenario:
*I have one material xyz
1. It is split valuated material,
2. Two valuation types with diff price control indicators
3. Batch Management is also activated on this material.*
Follwoing is the Material Master Accounting1 View :
Vauation Type Price Control Total Value Qty MAP Batch
ZA1 V 610835.00 37 16509.05(V) 01
ZB1 S 0 1 20000.00(S) 02
but when we are running MM03 w/o Valuation Type Accounting 1 View
is showing MAP as 16074.60 i.e. 610835.00/38
Diff. Reports Output------>
MB5L - List of Stock Values: Balances --> Output
ValArea Total Stock Total Value
A101 1 0
A101 37 610835.00
Net--> 38 610835.00
MB52 - Display Warehouse Stocks
Check Box - Display Batch Stocks
Condition1: When Display Batch Stocks is selected on main screen of MB52
Mat. Palnt Sloc Unrestricted Stck in Transit Total Value
xyz A101 0010 0 30 482238.00
XYZ A101 0010 7 0 115563.00
xyz A101 0010 1 0 0
This is not correct result as Total Values is 597801.00 only
Condition2: When Display Batch Stocks is not selected on main screen of MB52
Mat. Palnt Sloc Unrestricted Stck in Transit Total Value
xyz A101 0010 0 30 482238.00
XYZ A101 0010 8 0 128597.00
This is correct result as Total Values is 610835 .00 only
So my query on above issue is :
1. How System is including 1 Qty of Std Price Control for MAP calculation?
As per my understanding MAP is only for Price Control V indicator Materials Stock
2. Whats the difference between these two report output from MM03 Accounting
view?
Thankshi Animesh,
For Split Valuated Material at header level Price control is always "V" i.e. Moving average price reagrdless of the Price control you have given for different valuation types.
Due to this you are getting these kind of results. Please visit the following link for more information
http:///saphelp/EN/8f/d1de34e4cb2300e10000009b38f83b/frameset.htm
Check it and revert back.
Regards,
Jay
Edited by: SAP_MM on Dec 4, 2008 10:19 AM -
Define Control Storage Loc error LT206
Hi guru´s
I went to config 'Table for storage location control' and tried entering a storage location but I'm getting an error message: LT206: Based on SType control, stor loc XXX is unsuitable for stor loc control.
path
Logistic Execution> Warehouse Management > Data Master> Define Control Storage Loc
What config is necessary for this case? Appreciate any help on this matter. I don´t understand why a can´t for this combination the error message appear.
that the type of storage is storage block has something to do?
Thank you in advance.
regards
VascoHello Vasco,
you would use Stor. Location Control when you want to direct materials to different Storage location base on the movement types within a same Plant or warehouse. Check if you have maintained the right combination of the movement type and Sloc .
thanks,
Edited by: Ganesh Prabhakar C on Dec 14, 2010 1:04 PM -
Issue in creation of control cycle
Dear Gurus,
During creation of control cycle (LPK1), the fields for source information is not appearing in my system.
I compared control cycle in a different ECC system where source information is appearing.
How can make the screen appear in my ECC system.
Please find the screenshots.
Any pointers will be highly appreciated.
This thread is further to the threads in Production Planning and LE/WM Forum. I could not resolve the issue with the threads.
Hope that I will get any pointer in EWM forum.
http://scn.sap.com/thread/3609441
http://scn.sap.com/thread/3610822
With Regards,
MalayHello Malay,
Can first contact your ABAPer and ensure the bottom screen is not an Screen Enhancement?
If it is a some custom development, your ABAPer can help you on the logic behind it.
Else, Let us know.
Regards,
Sathish -
IF-statement in Personas that is checking if control is inactive?
Hi,
I have this simple script in screen personas that is clicking the option: "Attachment list". Everything is working great if there is attachments.
If there are no attachments the option is "inactive" or "greyed out". This will result in a script error.
I thought this was going to be an easy fix by adding IF statement to the the script. But howerver I specify the critera for the IF statement the script will always try to click the Attachment list. The condition will simply always be TRUE.
Am I missing something here or is it not possible at this time to script an IF statement that is checking if the control is inactive or similar?
Best Regards,
Oskar SöderlundThere is another way, but it will get a little tricky.
Outside of the transaction IE03 you can check for the existence of attachments for a piece of equipment by looking in table SRGBTBREL. Field TYPEID_A will be "EQUI" and field INSTID_A will be the equipment number, zero-padded on the left to 18 characters long. Use SE16 to look in the table and you'll get the idea.
You could wrap this test in an RFC-enabled ABAP function and call that from your Personas script button. Use the return value from that RFC to decide if attachments exist or not and how the script should respond. Details for how to write such an RFC and call it from a Personas script are in this blog: Calling RFCs from a Personas script.
Like I said, this isn't straightforward and perhaps Personas scripting should include an active/inactive test in addition to the exists/doesn't exist test. Until then, however, there is a way if you don't mind a bit of ABAP programming.
Maybe you are looking for
-
I purchased songs from iTunes Radio on my iPhone, but now the only place they will show up is in the iTunes Store app on my phone, even after syncing to my computer a million times, the songs do not show up in my library or anywhere else. My phone is
-
Autopopulate data in listitem based on the value of data in other itemlist
Hi, In my project there is requirement of populating the data in based on the value populated in other list item. For ex in list box item we select value 'PE' then in second list box based value of PE should be populated.If we select other value for
-
Table headings (tagged in paragraph tags) to be merged as a single entry in the TOC
Hello, I am working on a previous file done by somebody else. And here, I have the TOC as shown in screen shot below (which looks quiet normal). - The body page headings are placed in tables as shown in screen shot below. But, the entries when they
-
Fn F7 defaults from Presentation on Projector and Notebook back to My Normal Display Settings
I am using my T61 to project slides in class. When I connect it to the data projector, turn on the data projector, and use Fn F7 to switch from My Normal Display Settings to Presentation on Projector and Notebook, the signal does not get through to t
-
Has anyone in the community successfully OR NOT implemented Simpana backup?
We purchased Dell Comm Vault wth Simpana MML. We have been fighting with it trying to get it installed for a couple of months. We finally got a Simpana engineer on site and we are actually able to run sbttest successfully, but when we try to use the