Slow download time with XP

I have a desk top and a laptop. Desktop has XP, laptop has Win7. Download speed tests are as follows: Desktop in Firefox 7-8mbps, in Explorer 18. Downloads on laptop, no difference with either program 16- 18. I have latest versions on both computers. Why does the desktop using Firefox show half the download speed?
Thanks

What with Mountain Lion, iOS 6 and the new software Updates being out recently, the Apple Servers seem to be running slow probably due to huge download demand for the above.  I've noticed it too.
Hope this helps

Similar Messages

  • PAINFULLY SLOW launch times with MS Office 2004 Apps?

    Anyone else noticing painfully slow launch times with their MS Office 2004 Apps? It seems that each time I restart my machine and try to open any kind of office document the Word icon will bounce at least 15 times and then it takes forever for the application to actually launch. Once launched it seems fast and works fine, but not on initial launch after restart.
    Is this a Rosetta issue? Should I reinstall the MS Office apps?
    -JB

    Seems ok to me. Did you download the latest update which finally allows spotlight to search in Entourage and provide other improvements?
    http://www.microsoft.com/mac/downloads.aspx?pid=download&location=/mac/download/ office2004/Office2004_11.2.3.xml&secid=4&ssid=29&flgnosysreq=True
    "Microsoft Office 2004 for Mac 11.2.3 Update
    After you install this update, you can use Mac OS X Sync Services and Spotlight searches to sync and find Entourage items, use smart cards with Entourage 2004, and enjoy improved overall security and stability when using Microsoft Word 2004, Excel 2004, PowerPoint 2004, and Entourage 2004. This update also includes all of the improvements released in all previous Office 2004 updates.
    Applies to: Microsoft Office 2004 Standard Edition, Office 2004 Student and Teacher Edition, Office 2004 Professional Edition, Entourage 2004.
    Released: March 14, 2006"

  • Sudden slow download time

    Helloooo,
    My ATV has always downloaded nearly instantaneously, even HD movies...5 minutes MAX from order to watch.
    In August, I upgraded my internet to Comcast business class, I believe it's at 11mbps, but I consistently test out (www.whatismyip.com) around 10mbps (but as high as 20). My ATV has no wireless network connection. Download times decreased even beyond what I'd previously been experiencing.
    Now, with no changes internally to my network, TV shows that previously were immediately available are now taking 20+ minutes to download...movies...forget about spontaneous movie watching, we're now looking at a few hours to make popcorn.
    I have to say, too, that increased download times are not limited to my ATV; my MBP also experiences long delays.
    I contacted Apple, thinking it might be an issue with the recent firmware upgrade to ATV, but that wouldn't explain the slower MBP. I just wonder if anyone might have suggestions...might be able to point me in the right direction to troubleshoot.
    Many thanks,
    Melissa
    Message was edited by: Earth_Mother

    Given what you say about experiencing slow download times for all your devices I'd be contacting your ISP. It isn't unknown for ISP's to filter traffic at certain times of the day, indeed it seems to be becoming more common with certain ISP's.

  • Very slow download speeds with ATT U-Verse

    Hello,
    Experiencing very slow download speeds with Macbook Pro 2011, on Lion,  and ATT UVerse Max, which should allow for an avg. 11-12 MBPS speed. Instead, I get a fluctuating 60-370 kbps speed. I am not experiencing this problem on my Windows machines (Laptop running Windows 7 and Desktop on XP), it is only affecting the Macbook pro. I wonder if this issue is a known problem with ATT U-Verse and Macs, I spent hours yesterday with their support online and they couldn't help me, stating that from their side all settings were OK; the first representative from ATT re-booted the router remotely and that seemed to work for about 10 minutes, and then it went back to a crawling speed...
    Any suggestions welcome!
    Thanks

    Do you have QOS enabled in your router? Did you try plugging the win7 laptop directly and check the speed?

  • Problems with slow download time when loading graphic

    I have a problem over here....
    i have to load many graphic files for my applications. i have a total of around 20 graphic files with a total of 4200*29400 pixels.
    i am using MediaTracker class object and addImage method.
    but i find the downloading time is very slow......
    is there any other solutions to reduce to download time???

    bcoz i have divided the graphics into many smaller scaled graphics...that's why i have to load one by one.....
    any other possible solutions??

  • Very slow download speed with intermittent halts

    Need some help.
    I run Apple os/x latest version and have since yesterday begun to experience constant very slow download speeds.
    I have rebooted the router and I have reset it. I have tested with wireless and wired into router. No real change.
    The results are below and are pretty consistent no matter when or with what computer I test it with.
    This is very frustrating and I would like to know if anyone has experienced this and if there is anything I can do before calling for service.
    Thank you in advance.
    Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done
    SendBufferSize set to [131768]
    running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 5.44Mb/s
    running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 1.94Mb/s
    ------ Client System Details ------
    OS data: Name = Mac OS X, Architecture = x86_64, Version = 10.8.2
    Java data: Vendor = Apple Inc., Version = 1.6.0_37
    ------ Web100 Detailed Analysis ------
    Client Receive Window detected at 359104 bytes.
    10 Mbps Ethernet link found.
    Link set to Full Duplex mode
    Information: throughput is limited by other network traffic.
    Good network cable(s) found
    Normal duplex operation found.
    Web100 reports the Round trip time = 22.89 msec; the Packet size = 1448 Bytes; and
    There were 159 packets retransmitted, 288 duplicate acks received, and 394 SACK blocks received
    The connection stalled 9 times due to packet loss
    The connection was idle 2.01 seconds (16.75%) of the time
    This connection is sender limited 35.49% of the time.
    This connection is network limited 64.51% of the time.
    Excessive packet loss is impacting your performance, check the auto-negotiate function on your local PC and network switch
    Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to:
    RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON
    RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON
    RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF
    RFC 1323 Time Stamping: ON
    RFC 1323 Window Scaling: ON
    Information: Network Middlebox is modifying MSS variable
    Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End
    Information: Network Address Translation (NAT) box is modifying the Client's IP address
    Server says [71.100.xxx.xxx] but Client says [192.168.1.9]

    Both wired or wireless.
    auto - negotiate 
    Thank you.

  • Random, excruciatingly slow load time with 7900 Elite small form factor desktops

    Hi all, I have approx 300 HP 7900 Elite small form factor machines in my environment that were deployed just over two years ago. from the time of deployment we have experienced on about 50 occasions a random, excruciatingly slow load time that take about one hour for the user to login and open their programs. there has been no rhyme or reason for it, different floors, areas of the building, etc. I searched the forum for similar probs and didn't see one like this, I hope I'm not duplicating efforts from someone else's question... One thing we have noticed is that if we re-boot while it is going through the start-up process, it seems to "make it angry" and will lengthen the overall load time. We use the 32-bit Vista Enterprise OS. This is with a "stock" build, that is to say, our standard corporate build. our security policy does not allow users to install software, by the way. Thanks so much if you can help!

    Hi,
    How is the issue going? Usually, this error can be caused by missing third-party NIC driver. To solve the issue, we can download the missing network
    driver and update the WDS boot image to include it.
    In addition to the article provided by Chris, the following blog can also be referred to as reference.
    http://askmetricks.blogspot.in/2013/03/solvedwdsclient-error-occurred-while.html
    Please Note: Since the web site is not hosted by Microsoft, the link may change without notice. Microsoft does not guarantee the accuracy of this
    information.
    Best regards,
    Frank Shen

  • Is anybody having SLOW download times on iPad 2 ios7?

    I'm running iOS 7 on my iPad 2. I have a 30 Mbps broadband pipe. My husband and I have iPad 2's and iPhones. The iPhones are a 4s. We are getting download times on the phone of 30 Mbps. However the iPads are getting 5 to 10.  ***, is it iOS 7?

    I would back up the ipad and then do a full restore. This helped me with my speeds after the update.
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1414
    Also if you are tryiing to do this all over the same network if you have a lot of devices connected it could slow it down.
    Hope this helps
    -Steven

  • Slow loop times with 6024E and LV2009

    Hello all,
    I have searched the forums back and forth, in addtion to the knowledge base, but I am still confused as to the slow loop times I am experiencing.  I have a 6024e PCMCIA DAQ card with a very simple VI created in LV 2009.  I am using the DAQ Assistant to collect 1 thermocouple channel on a SCXI Chassis 32 channel thermocouple module.
    The problem is that the loop times in labview is about 3 seconds.  The DAQ Assistant acquisition mode is set to "on demand".  The target sample rate is about 1 to 2 samples per second.  I have read in previous posts that the repeated creation of the task using the DAQ Assistant with the acquisition mode set to "on-demand" can slow things down.
    What really has me confused is that using this exact same method of setting the DAQ Assistant acquisition mode to "on-demand" has worked fine on the same hardware when using one of the earlier v8 versions of LabView.  I don't understand what has changed and why the loop times are so much slower.  I planned to pull the newest LV2009 off the computer and put a previous v8 version on just to confirm my observations.  In addition, I pulled up a copy of the VI that was written in one of the v8.x versions and it used the DAQ Assitants with the acquisition mode set to "on-demand" and had a loop time of 0.100 seconds.
    Any help would be appreciated.  I have been working on this all day today with no sucess.
    Thanks in advance,
    Steve

    H_baker,
    I did have the patch applied at the time I was experiencing the problems.  The DAQmx driver version was the version that was supplied on the DVD that we received for LV2009.  I believe the actual version number was something like 8.9.5.
    The loop time was determined as follows:
    A simple vi I was written in a while loop.  The data acquisition was conducted using the DAQ assistant sampling 1 channel on the SCXI thermocouple module in a SCXI 1000 chassis.  Inside the loop of the vi the getdatetime function was placed and wired to an indicator on the screen.  The vi was then ran.  Observation showed that the loop time was typically 3 seconds and sometimes 6 seconds by keeping track of the datetime indicator on the front panel.
    The problem appears to be resolved now.  I had pulled off the LV2009 installation and put back on the 8.6 installation.  Recreated the vi and everything worked fine. As a sanity check I went ahead and reinstalled LV2009.  Recreated the vi again and everything works fine now.  The only real difference between the two installations is that I am using the latest NIDAQmx drives (I believe version 9.0.5).  It could have been just some sort of transient issue that resolved itself either by reinstallation or by rebooting.   Not sure.  I was just initially very concerned given that another posting had mentioned loop times of 3 seconds just like I was experiencing.
    Thanks,
    Steve

  • Slow downloading times when using the cloud

    Has anybody else noticed slow loading times when transfering files via the cloud? We have tested speeds across three of our magazines each on different networks. Some are faster than others but overall the speeds are still slower than we would hope.
    I did have a problem with Adobe servers many months ago when we were still using V11 and the rest of the world was on V17 but the engineering team at Adobe quickly fixed this for us. I am just wondering how everybody else is getting on time wise when downoaoding folios, it may be we have a problem with our network than needs addressing internally.
    Thanks
    Liam

    Katy ..
    I try to click a link I get a redirect loop message.  Also on some websites such as bbc.co.uk or hotmail will not load and I get the message
    Try troubleshooting malware >  The Safe Mac » Mac Malware Guide
    iCloud isn't the issue.

  • Slow render times with latest update

    Since updating to Premiere CC 7.1 I am experiencing extremly slow render speed with Magic Bullet Looks and .Filmconvert pro 2. When hitting enter to render it hangs for aout 10 seconds before starting. Then after each shot has been rendered it hangs again before continuing, What used to take around 20 minutes now takes 2 hours 34 minutes.
    Adobe, please can you show me how to roll back to version 7.0.1 as i don't have time to mess about with this.
    OS: Windows 7
    GTX 570 with latest driver (331.65)

    Hi captain,
    Check out the plug-ins manufacturer's web page and see if there are any updates for your plug-ins.
    Thanks,
    Kevin

  • Slow download performance with windows 7 on Cisco 2960S

    has someone experience with the the windows 7 on Cisco 2960S.
    One customer had the issue with very slow download rate ( 500kByte) with 100MB / full duplex and  default tcp paramenter under win 7 with IOS 12.2.55SE1.
    No error was seen.
    The change of follwing in windows improve the performance a litte bit to 1-2 MByte.
    no compression, no tcp windowing, no received side scaling, no windows side heuristic, no checksum offloading and a smaller MTU size than default.
    After update the Switch to 12.2.55.SE2 the performance imporve to 4-12 MByte.
    Has someone an idea about the chances in IOS 12.2.55SE2. I cant find anything in RN about this issue.
    Best regards
    Steffen

    I have the same issues in WS-C2960G-48TC-L  . my downloads dropped in my lan from 2 mb/s to 100kb/s in all operating systems including linux workstations . my ios version is 12.2(44)SE5 in 2960 switches .
    i have 2 x 4503-E L3 and 14 2960-48TC-L switches but i can not access the new ios versions to test if the issue is coming from ios version because of end of support .
    can someone ensure that the new ios remove this issue ?

  • Intermittant extremely slow download time ( 1Mbps) in recent 1-2 months

    Hello. Ever since I 'upgraded' to the Comcast router with integrated switch and Wi-Fi (perhaps a year ago?), I have seen higher speeds, but also more frequent problems.  I have not complained because the issues were intermittent and not too frequent.  This past month or two, the issues have become intolerable. I have seen dropped connection issues on Windows devices, Apple devices, my Samsung Smart TV (streaming NetFlix, for example), and my Amazon Echo.  Almost everything is wi-fi. I have repeatedly tried <every> suggestion I could find on Comcast's web site, as well as many others.  Rebooting everything, resetting the router, anti-virus scan, network scan, etc. Today, I have disconnected everything except one Windows laptop (over Wi-Fi), rebooted the router, and rebooted the laptop.  The problem persists. Web browsing, file downloading, sending/receiving email are all virtually unusable. Speedtest.net often reports good ping times (~10ms), bad download time (~0.06Mbps), and good upload time (10-11Mbps).  Today I see 4ms, 0.22Mbps, and 0.24Mbps. What can I do to determine if it is a problem with the router, or something else? Thanks for any help. 

    Today, I have reset the router to factory default, and only changed the admin password, wi-fi password and SSID.  Only my Windows laptop, iPhone, and iPad are on the network now. The problem persists.  Internet access is almost useless, and speedtest.net fails to complete the download test. tracert to comcast.net is repeatedly clean, while tracert to other networks looks to me like there is a problem between Comcast and other ISPs. Does this mean I can stop mucking with my own stuff? BTW: Any device I tether to my phone to use the AT&T 4g uplink, works fine. ====================================================================== C:\>tracert comcast.net Tracing route to comcast.net [69.252.80.75]
    over a maximum of 30 hops:   1     1 ms     1 ms     1 ms  10.0.0.1
      2    12 ms    11 ms    23 ms  96.120.101.21
      3    11 ms    14 ms    11 ms  te-0-2-0-11-sur03.bellevue.wa.seattle.comcast.net [68.86.177.109]
      4    19 ms    13 ms    17 ms  be-40-ar01.seattle.wa.seattle.comcast.net [69.139.164.6]
      5    14 ms    21 ms    15 ms  be-33650-cr02.seattle.wa.ibone.comcast.net [68.86.93.165]
      6    43 ms    41 ms    41 ms  be-11721-cr02.denver.co.ibone.comcast.net [68.86.84.205]
      7    42 ms    42 ms    42 ms  be-7922-ar02-d.potomac.co.ndcwest.comcast.net [68.86.95.10]
      8    41 ms    43 ms    44 ms  te-0-1-0-0-ar01-d.cmc.co.ndcwest.comcast.net [68.86.206.1]
      9    41 ms    42 ms    47 ms  te-3-1-ur03-d.cmc.co.ndcwest.comcast.net [68.86.132.46]
     10    40 ms    41 ms    40 ms  urlrw01.cable.comcast.com [69.252.80.75] Trace complete. C:\>tracert verizon.net Tracing route to verizon.net [206.46.232.39]
    over a maximum of 30 hops:   1     1 ms     2 ms     2 ms  10.0.0.1
      2    13 ms    11 ms    12 ms  96.120.101.21
      3    12 ms    11 ms    11 ms  te-0-1-0-10-sur02.bellevue.wa.seattle.comcast.net [68.85.144.125]
      4    13 ms    17 ms    12 ms  be-1-sur03.bellevue.wa.seattle.comcast.net [68.86.96.142]
      5    14 ms    12 ms    19 ms  be-40-ar01.seattle.wa.seattle.comcast.net [69.139.164.6]
      6    15 ms    16 ms    16 ms  be-33650-cr02.seattle.wa.ibone.comcast.net [68.86.93.165]
      7    28 ms    14 ms    14 ms  he-0-10-0-1-pe05.seattle.wa.ibone.comcast.net [68.86.88.126]
      8   608 ms    13 ms    16 ms  173.167.57.250
      9     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     10     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     11     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     12    66 ms    67 ms    66 ms  206.46.228.129
     13    69 ms    77 ms    67 ms  206.46.232.39 Trace complete. C:\>tracert microsoft.com Tracing route to microsoft.com [134.170.188.221]
    over a maximum of 30 hops:   1     3 ms     1 ms     1 ms  10.0.0.1
      2    11 ms    15 ms    13 ms  96.120.101.21
      3    23 ms    12 ms    11 ms  te-0-1-0-10-sur02.bellevue.wa.seattle.comcast.net [68.85.144.125]
      4    13 ms    11 ms    12 ms  be-1-sur03.bellevue.wa.seattle.comcast.net [68.86.96.142]
      5    16 ms    14 ms    13 ms  be-40-ar01.seattle.wa.seattle.comcast.net [69.139.164.6]
      6    17 ms    17 ms    18 ms  be-33650-cr02.seattle.wa.ibone.comcast.net [68.86.93.165]
      7    14 ms    12 ms    14 ms  he-0-13-0-0-pe05.seattle.wa.ibone.comcast.net [68.86.84.138]
      8    23 ms    14 ms    18 ms  as8075-1-c.seattle.wa.ibone.comcast.net [173.167.56.178]
      9    34 ms    33 ms    34 ms  104.44.8.68
     10    34 ms    33 ms    35 ms  be-4-0.ibr01.bay.network.microsoft.com [104.44.4.104]
     11    34 ms    31 ms    31 ms  104.44.8.199
     12     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     13     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     14     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     15     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     16     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     17     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     18     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     19     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     20     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     21     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     22     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     23     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     24     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     25     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     26     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     27     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     28     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     29     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     30     *        *        *     Request timed out. Trace complete. C:\>tracert wa.gov Tracing route to wa.gov [198.239.146.53]
    over a maximum of 30 hops:   1     3 ms     1 ms     2 ms  10.0.0.1
      2    14 ms    12 ms    12 ms  96.120.101.21
      3    12 ms    16 ms    14 ms  te-0-1-0-11-sur02.bellevue.wa.seattle.comcast.net [68.86.113.181]
      4    12 ms    12 ms    14 ms  be-1-sur03.bellevue.wa.seattle.comcast.net [68.86.96.142]
      5    13 ms    12 ms    14 ms  be-40-ar01.seattle.wa.seattle.comcast.net [69.139.164.6]
      6    28 ms    32 ms    15 ms  be-33650-cr02.seattle.wa.ibone.comcast.net [68.86.93.165]
      7    14 ms    14 ms    13 ms  he-0-12-0-0-pe05.seattle.wa.ibone.comcast.net [68.86.84.54]
      8   603 ms    13 ms    14 ms  as11404-1-c.seattle.wa.ibone.comcast.net [23.30.206.34]
      9    16 ms    14 ms    14 ms  agg2-sea-b-t3-1.bb.spectrumnet.us [174.127.140.186]
     10    17 ms    13 ms    14 ms  Noanet-SEA-10000M.demarc.spectrumnet.us [216.243.28.190]
     11    39 ms    37 ms    38 ms  xe-0-0-0.3006.oly-cor1.noanet.net [64.184.178.22]
     12    43 ms    37 ms    38 ms  66.119.222.230
     13     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     14     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     15     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     16     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     17     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     18     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     19     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     20     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     21     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     22     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     23     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     24     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     25     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     26     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     27     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     28     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     29     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     30     *        *        *     Request timed out. Trace complete. C:\>
    ======================================================================   

  • Help - Getting slower render times with AE CS6

    Hi everyone
    Wonder if anyone else is getting as described?
    I have a 3m37s project which is predomnantly motion graphics using live shot footage (.MXF files), Illustrator and a few JPGs.
    In CS5 AE I get render times which average around 45mins, so I thought I'd see how quickly CS6 could crank it out by - as you can see I'm getting times which are in excess of 2 almost 3hours!
    The project contains a few 2.5D moves as well as tiny bit of Trapcode 3D Stroke
    I have mentioned on this forum that I'm having the Error 5070 problems with start up and Ray Trace is unavailable but these times seem seriously wrong to me.
    Mac Pro 3,1 (2x 2.8GHZ)
    20GB RAM
    OS 10.7.4
    NVIDIA GeForce GT8800
    NVIDIA Quadro 4000 both on GPU Driver 207.00.00.f06
    CUDA Driver 4.2.10
    All files are on a 2TB drive (7200rpm)
    Rendering to a 1TB drive (7200rpm)
    Corsair SSD 60gb Cache drive
    As an observation when I watch the frames counter ticking over, CS5 seems to steadily work it's way through the render at around less than a frame a second, CS6 seems to crank out 2-6 frames then hold for 30secs before working on another batch. It crawls to a halt near the end.
    Can anyone offer any help or advice?
    So far I'm not having a great time with my CS6 transition
    Thanks
    Rob
    Message was edited by: Bokeh Creative Ltd
    because of a Typo

    Thanks Rick - Yes what confused me was that it only took 45mins in CS5 even with MP 'on'
    Still having no joy with Ray Tracing though, even though I have a Quadro 4000 card, I get the 5070 error on start up. Any ideas?

  • Very slow downloading webpages with Firefox 3.6.8; no problem with IE;

    Firefox is very slow loading web pages. Was OK with the old version. This happened after I downloaded latest upgraded version 3.6.8
    == This happened ==
    Every time Firefox opened
    == after loading new version of Firefox, 3.6.8

    Not only do I have the snail version of firefox but I keep getting messages that Firefox can't find the server, or that it has times out. I have had to retry numerous times. I just had a problem with FF opening a one-page pdf. After what seemed like forever, I copied and pasted the url into IE and it opened almost immediately. After I read the pdf and downloaded it, I closed IE and saw that FF was still in the process of opening the page. I loved FF,but don't have time to wait until my next birthday to view/open a site. Incidentally, my birthdate is 07/11. This is seriously hampering my participation in two online graduate courses. I have been running Win 7 since March, but not had these problems until recent updates. I even had firefox set to notify me and ask before installing updates, but it was changed to automatically install updates when I just checked. I am the only user of this computer (live alone).
    ''' ALSO''', when I checked update history, there is an update for (3.6.4) that shows as successful that took place on '''Wednesday December 31, 1969.''' I don't believe that Firefox existed in 1969 or Internet Explorer for that matter. I couldn't highlight and copy the info in my history, but did copy with pen and paper. This is what was showing for the 3.6.4 update:
    '''FireFox 3.6.4 (20100611143157)'''
    Security Update
    '''Installed''' on '''Wednesday, December 31, 1969''' 6:00:00 PM
    Status The update was successfully installed
    There is definitely something amiss unless the creators of FireFox have mastered time travel!
    Since I do not have the time to open FireFox and check here to see if a solution to these problems has been determined (based on s-l-o-w performance of FF over the past week or so) would someone email me with a link that I can access through another browser, if necessary?
    Email: [email protected]

Maybe you are looking for

  • How can i add a new 53 rd week to calendar

    Hi All, we have requirment i need to add a new week to fiscal year 2011 for septemebr,2011 Please let me know how can i add a new week to this month, Thanks & regards, Chand

  • Credit Memo Quantity to be Equal to Quantity rejected via 'Return Delivery'

    Dear All, In ideal scenario of MIRO (Credit Memo) , the quantity proposed by the System is equivalent to the Quantity of MIRO. There has been a requirement from My client that the quantity should be equal to the quantity for which rejection ( Movemen

  • Reg: consistency check in recordset structure validation

    Hi all, I am doing FCC to FCC scenario, i am getting this error. Help me out, it is very urgent for me. Sender Adapter v2723 for Party '', Service 'bs_text2text': Configured at 2007-08-21 08:00:49 UTC History: - 2007-08-21 09:29:06 UTC: Retry interva

  • Paper on science (astronomy) use of 3-d PDF

    Hi folks, for those of you interested in seeing how 3-d PDF can be used in the physical sciences you might like to see this paper. While the subject area of the paper is 3-d PDF for astronomy publishing, it could equally be applied to many other area

  • Conversion Function module for Volume

    hi,   Is there any standard function module to do the conversion of VOLUME. for example : if i have source volume in one unit & i want it in another unit. regards, srikanth,Intelligroup.