Slow page loading / Time outs

Hi guys,
I am getting very slow page loading times. This only started to happen today, before this my connection has been solid.
I have reset the router, all the other PCs in my house are having the same problem. I am not running any P2P/Downloading software.
Speedtest says I am connected at 12MBPs. It takes me a very long time to load a page and most of the time they just time out.
Router stats -
ADSL settings
VPI/VCI 0/38
Type PPPoA
Modulation ITU-T G.992.5
Latency type Interleaved
Noise margin (Down/Up) 3.6 dB / 5.7 dB
Line attenuation (Down/Up) 29.5 dB / 12.7 dB
Output power (Down/Up) 0.0 dBm / 12.9 dBm
Cheers

Keith_Beddoe wrote:
There appears to be a problem with the BT DNS servers at the moment. They keep going offline.
Hopefully someone is aware and dealing.
Which ones are you using ? BT have LOTS of machines providing DNS services
I'm currently using:
Primary: 194.72.9.38
Secondary: 194.72.0.114
...and haven't really noticed anything untoward all day, and I've been online and active for most of the day. Not much longer though - soon finished, then it's beer
I have seen quite a few reports of slow loading pages etc elsewhere though.

Similar Messages

Very long web page load time out

Hello,
In Firefox Android when several resources in a page do not load, Firefox android shows a white page and waits for a very long time to time out those resources and display the rest of the page, while Firefox in PC quickly ignores the time outs within a page and displays the page.
How can I make the android version time out quickly and display whatever is available in a page?
Thanks

Hi FAnDwyHSHoo2K,
There actually is not a feature to do this in the ui. However you may be able to find the about:config entry that controls the timeout default time. [http://kb.mozillazine.org/Firefox_:_FAQs_:_About:config_Entries]

Slow Slow Slow page loading times using Iweb......

I used Iweb to create a photo gallery / web site and it loads very slow...I expect the images to load slowly but even the text hangs up a bit. It is worse on IE and the layout is messed up on Firefox....is there a way to make a website created on I-web uniform for all browsers and of course load and unload faster? I have cut my image files down in half ...they are about 400-600 kB (JPG) each but they still load slow...not to mention an annoying white block where the image and text is loading?? Any help from a seasoned I-web vet?

Hi,
I faced same troubles. Read through my thread http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1131543
Vonz.

S4 slow page load and email wont receive auto

I got the s4 1 week ago came from an iphone, so far not impressed! Slow page load time and email although set automatic wont load. phone is very slow! what should I do?

Hello G433062,
Have no fear Verizon is here! I am so sorry that you are having an issue with the Samsung S4 opening page slowly. We want you love your phone! Has this been an issue when you are using the Internet application? Or is it slow at opening any application? Have you tried to clear the history: http://vz.to/1g2WXjg Please keep us posted.
KevinR_VZW
Please follow us on Twitter @VZWSupport

Slow page loads over LAN with 500GB TC

Hello,
Forgive me if this has already been touched on, I tried to run through the first six pages and didn't see anything that I thought matched my problem. I saw that there were reports of slow wireless speeds, but I have been experiencing problems over the wired connection to my TC
I have a MBP connected to the TC wirelessly and a Mac Pro with a wired connection to the TC. They both render similar speeds in a speed test ~4Mbits down, but on my Mac Pro, I get excruciatingly slow page loads. Pages often take, on average, 15-20 seconds to come up at all, and some more time to finish loading completely. Meanwhile, I can load the same pages in a few seconds with my MBP over the wireless network.
My cable coming from the TC to my Mac Pro is brand new, its at least CAT5e, and should be able to handle my down speeds without a problem. So I'm at a loss for what could be causing this. Could it be something with the computer and not the TC at all?
Thanks,
Scott

Well, creating a test user put me on the right path. Deleting the systemconfiguration folder did not help, but I deleted the following files out of the $user/library/preferences folder:
com.apple.internetconfig.plist
com.apple.internetconfigpriv.plist
com.apple.internetconnect.plist
com.apple.networkConnect.000a27b47970.plist
com.apple.preference.internet.plist
com.apple.PrefPane.Network.000a27b47970.plist
Basically any preference with "Network" or "Internet" in it and everything sped up immediately. Thanks for the help.

Web Server NetworkTopology - Reduce Web Page Loading Times

Hello,
Not sure which forum is best to approach because I think my setup and requirements may fall into several areas of consideration, but here goes. With reference to the diagram below:
Basically I host my own website using IIS on a W7 box that sits behind my Windows Server 2012R2 box that I use as a DNS server with the following roles:
Routing and Remote Access, DNS Server, AD, NAT
What I'm wanting to do is to change my network configuration to the bottom diagram i.e put my webserver in front of the the windows server so that it is internet facing without having to route HTTP requests through my server machine, the objective is to
limit the hardware that HTTP requests need to travel through in order to speed up the web page loading times. I have tried the new preferred configuration but I am actually finding that the web page takes another 10 seconds longer to load with the new configuration.
My DNS server is authoritative for my website domain name, my idea or understanding for the new configuration is the following: (this may be wrong, not sure!)
Someone browses my site i.e makes an initial DNS request for my website, the DNS inquiry is passed through my hardware firewall to my DNS server, the DNS server then points the DNS request to the webserver box, then when an HTTP request for website is received
by my hardware firewall, the firewall redirects the HTTP request directly to the webserver.
I thought that the above new configuration would actually speed up the web page loading response time as the HTTP traffic would no longer have to travel through my DNS server before reaching the webserver and then make its way back to the remote host across
the WAN
Can someone please tell me where I am going wrong with my configuration? thanks in advance

Hi,
Is your website loaded very slow?
If yes, please try to perform a network capture on the client. We can find which part is slow by analysing the capture data.
If the DNS process is slow, please try to use nslookup to verify if it is a DNS issue.
If the HTTP process is slow, please check if there is any tcp retransmission in the capture data.
Best Regards.
Steven Lee
TechNet Community Support

Calculate Page Load Time

Hi All,
Is it possible to calculate the page load time in ADF?
Regards,
Rekha

@Chris I've given up on suspectin' and need some directin' :)
@Rehka - if you are talking about doing this at runtime (as opposed to at "performance testing" time) - you would have to measure the page load times at the end-user browser session. The only way to do this (quite obviously) is to have code running at the browser side to do this. I believe GMail does something like this and offers the end user a choice to revert to a more basic interface if the connection seems to be slow, but I have no idea how it's done (well, I'm pretty sure that it uses Javascript, but that's the extent of my idea).
John

Page load time differences between IE and Firefox

Hello all,
I have a problem with page loading time in IE 8. My page contains tabular form, classic report and some other items. I use some javascript code(placed in HTLM Header section) and also dynamic actions. When I try to display the page in IE I have to wait for 40 seconds (100 rows in tabular form). I realized that the performance is dependent on the number of displayed rows in the tabular form. But decrease the number of visible rows, using pagination, is not an option, because all needed rows should be visible for the users. During the tests I have tried to remove all the JS code and disable all the dynamic action, but the loading time was more or less the same.
When I try to run the same page in FireFox then it is displayed in 4 seconds!
I have already try to search some tips or advices how to speed up the page loading, but only what I have found out is, that every web browser is different. The javascript is handled differently, page rendering is done differently and so on.
Maybe there is something what I have missed, and you experts can help me. Is there anything general what I should check or change to speed up the loading time in IE?
Thanks in advance!
Jiri
APEX v. 4.2.1.00.08
IE 8.0.7600.16358
FF 19.0.2

Thanks Denes for your reply.
I use HttpWatch tool to measure the loading times. Reports are mostly the same for IE and FF. I can see from the report, there is three times shown error 404 Not Found for the items below.
http://......./images/sRegion-Body.png
http://......./images/sRegion-Bottom.png
http://......./images/sReportBG-Standard.png
The last action which caused 404 error started 2 seconds after the page was asked to refresh. The next action http://......../i/libraries/jquery-ui/1.8.22/ui/i18n/oracle/jquery.ui.datepicker-cs.js started after 38 seconds (hanging in the same place for 36 seconds). Does it mean that the problem is caused by http://......./images/sReportBG-Standard.png action which returns 404 error?
How can I add the missing images?
-Jiri

Slow page loads, dropped connection

Hi,
Looking for some advice here. I write for the web for a living, and spend most of my day online. I'm not happy with the speed of my connection right now, and am considering upgrading to a faster package. I'm currently on the 768k to 1.5Mbps DSL package.
The problem is, I don't get anywhere near the speed I'm paying for now. Page load times go from speedy to drop dead slow (20-30 secs), and often hang. I'm not sure what's going on, although I can say my mother has the same problems at her house (next town over, same DSL package). I can't see paying for a "faster" package when I don't even get the speed I should be now.
Here are some stats. Hoping someone can take a look and give me some thoughts about whether a speed upgrade would be worth it.
Verizon speed test:
Analysis information:
Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done
SendBufferSize set to [132480]
running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 481.45Kb/s
running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 138.24kb/s
------ Client System Details ------
OS data: Name = Mac OS X, Architecture = x86_64, Version = 10.6.8
Java data: Vendor = Apple Inc., Version = 1.6.0_24
------ Web100 Detailed Analysis ------
Client Receive Window detected at 524280 bytes.
Cable modem/DSL/T1 link found.
Link set to Full Duplex mode
Information: throughput is limited by other network traffic.
Good network cable(s) found
Normal duplex operation found.
Web100 reports the Round trip time = 155.6 msec; the Packet size = 1440 Bytes; and
There were 40 packets retransmitted, 2 duplicate acks received, and 0 SACK blocks received
The connection stalled 2 times due to packet loss
The connection was idle 1.05 seconds (8.07%) of the time
This connection is sender limited 22.57% of the time.
This connection is network limited 77.42% of the time.
Excessive packet loss is impacting your performance, check the auto-negotiate function on your local PC and network switch
Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to:
RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON
RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON
RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF
RFC 1323 Time Stamping: ON
RFC 1323 Window Scaling: ON
Information: Network Middlebox is modifying MSS variable
Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End
Information: Network Address Translation (NAT) box is modifying the Client's IP address
Server says [72.68.84.139] but Client says [192.168.0.4]
Broadband Speed Reports tests:
Parsippanny, NJ (closest server) -
Download 210 kbps
Upload 367 kbps
latency 40 ms
Washington, DC -
Download 794 kbps
Upload 347 kbps
latency 24 ms
Los Angeles -
Download 423 kbps
Upload 333 kbps
latency 124 ms
Router stats:
ADSL Link Downstream Upstream
Connection Speed 1792 kbps 448 kbps
Line Attenuation 17.0 db 7.5 db
Noise Margin 30.3 db 21.0 db
I think my transceiver stats look good for higher speeds, but I'm wondering why I get such inconsistent and generally slow download speeds now.
Thanks for your help.
Debbie

Has the line been performing any better since the last post? If not, find a time where it is working poorly and register an account over at DSLReports.com if you don't already have one. Fron there, visit their Tools section of their site and perform the Line Quality/Ping test. Be sure that before you start the test, your router/modem is not blocking Pings since this will result in the test having less data. Also, ensure nothing is using your connection before and during the time of the test being ran. Post up the results of the test once it has been completed.
========
The first to bring me 1Gbps Fiber for $30/m wins!

Shadow and gradients slow page load...why?

I have read how shadows and gradients slow down a web site, and that you should replace them with (essentially) screen shots of the same (i.e. looks the same, but not using the shadow or gradient feature of iweb).
I understand that larger photos (etc) slow down a page load, but I don't follow why these do. I am curious for an explaination. It would seem intuitive that the apple folks would publish a web site in a way that did not cause this (i.e. covert shadows and gradients to jpgs or something).
thanks
bob

Shadows and gradients generally actually don't cause professional designers any issues, how you design it and what file format is important, most produce high quality images with a low impact to the web page load time. I have been designing for over 20 years and quite like iWeb challenges .
iWeb however does something quite different, it adds to an existing image, mainly using javascript which slows the rendering and page loads. iWeb works great for non professionals as it's dreadfully poor from a site point of view, remember iweb is a toy in the software world of web design tools, so enjoy it for what it is..
A simple way to prove is to design a single page in iWeb and the another using, say, Dreamwever, look at the rendering/load times.....

Calculating Page Loading Time

Hi Friends,
I wouldlike to know how to calculate the page loading time after I click a button on a page. Assume that after clickiing the button, first a servelt is called, processing is done and after that a jsp will be thrown to browser. Now after completely loading the JSP page, I mean, status bar in the browser is clean and no globe is revolving at the top of the browser, I need to insert this page loading time into database.
How can I do this using java technology.
Plase throw some light on this . It is very urgent.
Thanks & Regards,
Murthy
[email protected]

Do you mean that you want something on your server to know how long it took the browser to load the page? There's no way to know that. After your server sends the data, that data can travel over a variety of communication networks and through a variety of network node computer buffers. Moreover, your page may have links (to images for example) that the browser will also load via separate requests.
All you can tell is how long it took your server to produce and send the page.

Archives, Page Load Time, Commenting and Trackback

I've been looking through the iWeb forums somewhat, as well as designing a little bit of a website in iWeb (link), and I've found some things to be excited about, and some things that are still unknown. (Here's my original .Mac site, which I will continue to maintain for now).
I really need commenting to work before I can switch to using iWeb as my blogging tool (right now I use Thingamablog, which works pretty well, but is 'unpolished'). I haven't taken too much time to experiment with hand-coding the template files (plus, I haven't found where they might be...), but it looks like the HTML output of iWeb is something I wouldn't want to deal with anyway.
Another feature of the blogging in iWeb that could use a complete overhaul is the archive. I don't think it's at all sensible to put every single entry (if only a title) on one web page; after a month (or a year, in my case), that page would be so long no one would ever think about scrolling through it to see an entry.
And, after reading a few other user's opinions of iWeb, I've found that, yes, it is stupid to have to hand-format every single blog entry (moving text, moving images around, etc.). Very un-intuitive for anyone who blogs more than once a week.
Finally, as other users have posted, the load time for pages is terrible. I thought that iWeb would do a great job at making things look nice using JPEGs and fairly small file sizes, however, I've found that, even if I pre-format a graphic for the right size in Photoshop, the file is converted to a PNG in iWeb, with a ridiculously large file size.
There are a few other problems with iWeb, such as it's inability to allow target="_blank" links for opening new windows, and some other fairly common features of even the simplest blog and website creation tools, and I only hope that these things will be fixed and improved dramatically, or I may never find a use for iWeb.
Now, you may say I am not the user iWeb was intended for... and you are partly right. However, I am looking for a simple tool for a quick picture page or a blog, with little or no hassle, that looks great and doesn't make a huge (in terms of file size) web page. I will have to stick to using Adobe GoLive and Thingamablog for the time being, even for small projects, until some of the above features are added.
P.S. I have also sent this post as feedback to Apple. I suggest you do the same.
[Edit: I've found this thread discussing where templates and such are, but that is no help, since the templates themselves are not very easy to understand...]

Hi Anoop21,
>>Could you please explain the difference between Page Load Time and Page Response Time ?
Based on your issue, I know that the Page Load time is used to count load a page main requests and all dependent requests (images, css, js...) time.
The Page Response Time is count the page main requests time without including the dependent requests time.
So the different is that if the page has the dependent requests.
Hope it help you!
Best Regards,
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

Slow page loads only since 10.4 upgrades

Hi folks,
Has anyone seen a problem with pages hanging up after updating from earlier OS X's to 10.4? First my wife noticed it when she got her new Mac Book -- an upgrade from 10.2.8 on the old machine. A couple of items would load on a page, but then it hangs up and stalls for a while until finally fully loading. Ordinarily, I'd peg it as just being slow serving of ads to particular sites, but it's not always ad-rich sites. And more so, it's strange that this only started happening in conjunction with starting to use 10.4 to surf the same sites that weren't hanging up before.
Further confirming my belief that it has to do with 10.4, is that upon my upgrading from 10.3 to 10.4 on my G5 a month or so later, I started to immediately notice slow, slow page loads on that machine, too. Particularly, again, on sites that loaded fine with 10.3 just before the upgrade.
I'm also having more problems with mailboxes loading slowly and kicking off-line since the upgrade.
Is there some trick to get 10.4 to behave with regard to requests across the web??
Thanks!!!!
G5 Dual 1.8 Mac OS X (10.4.7) Focusrite Saffire Audio Interface

me too. My mini is wired, but I have the same trouble. I have a PC on the same router, and it has no problem with internet. I've been looking around a while, and it seems like this is a common occurrence and I have not found a fix yet. This is very frustrating. Also, the network status in the network diagnostics window shows the internet failing alot, but even when it's "green" I still can't always load pages.

Page load time of portal

What is the average page loading time of webcenter portal?

2 to 5 content presenters on a single page is to much. You need to try to consolidate the content so you can minimize the number of content presenters on a page.
Most of the time the problem is in the content model. Even complex content models can be put in a single data file by using lists and so on. This way you can minimize the CP's to one or two per page.
When using coherence you should always set the expiry-delay for the ContentNodeCaches to 0 which means that coherence will never invalidate the cache!
The reason behind this is that the connection to UCM implements a content sweeper which will invalidate the cache items that have been changed. In the Enterprise Manager you have the field "Cache Invalidation Interval". This will determine the interval in which a service from UCM is called to check which items have been updated. This will also notify coherence and update the nodes with the new version.
That's why the expiry delay needs to set to 0 in coherence.
Also set the high units to 80% of your entire repository that is used on the top pages. This can easily be 10000 without problem.
I'm planning on writing a blog post about these configurations later on.
The JOC configuration is OOTB but you need to run a script to enable it. It is recommended when you use WC Spaces.
Information can be found here: http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23943_01/core.1111/e12037/extend_wc.htm#CHDIFEJH

Flip4Mac Beta, Slow WMV load time?

Just wondering if anyone else who is using Flip4Mac Beta Universal is experiencing slow load time when loading a WMV movie file. I loaded a 1920x1200 606MB video file and that might be why. Anyway, just wanted to see if anyone else is experiencing slow WMV load time.

Like you I've noticed that when working with larger media files it'll slow down loading and other aspects. Especially moving through said files by fast forward/reverse.
I wouldn't exactly call it too bad though. QT native files get slowed down the larger they are too.
Don't forget it's still a Beta.

Slow page loading / Time outs

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for