Slow performance creating UDT/UDF

When creating UDT/UDF via SAPbobsCOM.UserTableMD and SAPbobsCOM.UserFieldMD OR via SAPbobsCOM.Company.GetBusinessObjectFromXML(...) we experience extreme slow performance. One field of a table takes at least a second to be created.
We already checked the DB/Server, no problems there (in fact, it does not even show up as laggy.
Any hints? Is there so much data to be transported from client to server or what might be wrong?
Krischan

My setup takes between 8 and 15 seconds to create 65 user defined fields and one user defined table.
As I am able to watch the progress, I experience that creating user defined fields for documents is much slower than creating a user defined field for a user defined table.
Personally I think it's because every time a document udf is created, every document table is altered by mssql (the udfs are physically added to every table).
At least it don't take a whole second per table, which definitly sounds like "too much" to me...

Similar Messages

  • Create UDT and UDF while installing theAdd-on

    Dear Sir,
    Can someone help me by providing me code sample of how can i create UDT and UDF into SAP BO while installing my Add-On.
    Thanks in advance
    Best Regards

    Hi Mary,
    Please refer to this thread database
    Regards
    Aravind

  • Server 2012 R2 slow performance over all

    This is a DELL PowerEdge R820 / 256GB RAM / 4TB onboard storage configured as Remote Desktop Services Host /TS... running QuickBooks, MS Office 2010 STD, Symantec EndPoint Protection (basic antivirus installation ONLY)... 1 month old server... SUPER fast,
    super powerfull.... Part of an AD in SBS 2008 Premium... single NIC card 4 ports / 3 ports disabled. single IP... no VLANS... server is able to resolve ANY pc, DNS record with no problems... able to resolve DC by name, able to receive GP, able to update, able
    to do everything that I can think of.... EXCEPT... anything I open, word, excel, QuickBooks, IE.... takes forever to open... after the application is open is fast but to open anything takes 3-4 minutes.... open ticket with Symantec all looks good, created
    lots of exceptions for antivirus/real time scanning, open ticket with QuickBooks: files look good application was removed and reinstalled to be sure all was done correctly... check the binding order for the disabled NIC; the active one is TOP option, no errors
    at all in event viewers for system, application, setup, no errors at all in DELL management tool, no hard drive errors, no controllers errors.... this server is replacing an old dell poweredge 2008 STD with 24GB RAM... the old DELL opens the same applications
    way faster than the new one... same Quicken version; old server opens Quicken in seconds, new one 3-4 minutes..... Real time monitoring NEVER goes above 1% for CPU and 3% for memory utilization.... one more thing... removed antivirus 100% restart... same performance
    without antivirus.....
    Any ideas will be great as of how to troubleshoot the slow performance....
    Thank you!

    Hi,
    As Sam suggested, please check if there any issue occurred in hard drive.
    On current situation, please also refer to following steps and troubleshoot, then check if we can find more
    clues.
    Please check if you have installed all necessary updates for the Windows Server 2012 R2.
    Please
    perform a clean boot to check if there has software conflicts.
    Please use Resource Monitor to troubleshoot and check if we can find some more details.
    Using Resource Monitor to Troubleshoot Windows Performance Issues Part 1
               Using
    Resource Monitor to Troubleshoot Windows Performance Issues Part 2
    If any update, please feel free to let me know.
    Hope this helps.
    Best regards,
    Justin Gu

  • Slow performance LR 1.3.1 (Library Module)

    LR 1.2 is running OK on my iMac. A while ago I tried LR 1.3. The upgrade really slowed down performance. Mostly a lag in the sliders and navigation tools in both Library and Develop modules that made it unworkable to me. I changed back to LR 1.2.
    Since I want to import Canon G9 RAW files into LR, I upgraded to LR 1.3.1 recently. Performance of sliders and the navigation tool in the Develop module seems the same as in LR 1.2 (or maybe even a little better). Which means it is OK (workable). It still shows the blur when navigating a 100% zoomed image though. But the navigation tool in the Library module still has the same slow performance as it had in LR 1.3. Unworkable!!! I tried everything: optimizing, new catalog, rendering previews, etc.
    I need the Library module to work smoothly (as in LR 1.2) in order to compare images at 100% zoom. I am afraid I have to go back to LR 1.2 again and find another solution for my Canon G9 RAW files. Most inconvenient. I am very disappointed. Especially, since Adobe showed they CAN get it right with the Develop module in version LR 1.3.1...
    Oh yeah, my system specs:
    iMac 2.16 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
    3GB 667 Mhz DDR2 SDRAM (2GB + 1GB)
    232,89 GB Harddrive, 113 GB available
    ATI Radeon X1600 128MB
    Mac OS 10.4.11
    Please Adobe, make the Library module run as smoothly as the Develop module in version 1.3.2...

    The preview folder is 2,11 GB big. The .lrcat is 47 MB big.
    I opened a new test catalog. I imported 326 images. After the import I rendered 1:1 previews. It took a long time. Real memory used was between 700-1000MB. Virtual memory used was between 1000-1400MB. When it was done rendering it still keep on using 700MB real memory and 1000MB virtual memory. I had to close LR and restart. Real memory after restart was 75MB real memory and 375 virtual memory.
    But it didn't matter. The lag in the navigation tool of the Library module was still there.
    I noticed that when clicking in the navigation window there was less delay as when I slide the white square in the window (in Library module). In the develop module this seems the other way around. Sliding showed less delay than clicking.
    What's going on here?
    I also have a MacBook. Performance seems much faster than on my iMac overall. After creating a new catalog and rendering 1:1 previews, the lag in the navigation window seems less than before. But it was still there...

  • Slow performance with 2 new full T1 installed .

    We've just added second Full T1 line to
    this router to dedicate full T1 bandwidth our two database servers.We are still experiencing the slow performance to our remote location such as file copying and acceessing applications.below are configs and sh run.Any help and inputs are greatly appreciated.Is the router configuration correct? or need to be modified.Thanks
    Danny.
    router2621xm#sh run
    Building configuration...
    Current configuration : 1924 bytes
    version 12.3
    service timestamps debug datetime msec
    service timestamps log datetime msec
    service password-encryption
    service udp-small-servers
    service tcp-small-servers
    hostname OPS
    boot-start-marker
    boot-end-marker
    enable secret xxxx
    enable password xxxx
    no network-clock-participate slot 1
    no network-clock-participate wic 0
    no aaa new-model
    ip subnet-zero
    ip cef
    no ftp-server write-enable
    class-map match-any VOIP
    match ip dscp ef
    policy-map VOIP-QOS
    class VOIP
    priority 1158
    class class-default
    fair-queue
    random-detect dscp-based
    interface FastEthernet0/0
    ip address 192.168.157.1 255.255.255.0 secondary
    ip address 192.168.7.1 255.255.255.0
    ip policy route-map policyroute speed auto
    full-duplex
    no mop enabled
    interface Serial0/0
    ip unnumbered FastEthernet0/0
    service-policy output VOIP-QOS
    no ip mroute-cache
    interface Serial0/1
    ip unnumbered FastEthernet0/0
    service-policy output VOIP-QOS
    no ip mroute-cache
    router eigrp 15
    network 192.168.1.0
    network 192.168.2.0
    network 192.168.3.0
    network 192.168.4.0
    network 192.168.5.0
    network 192.168.6.0
    network 192.168.7.0
    network 192.168.8.0
    network 192.168.151.0
    network 192.168.152.0
    network 192.168.153.0
    network 192.168.154.0
    network 192.168.155.0
    network 192.168.156.0
    network 192.168.157.0
    network 192.168.158.0
    network 192.168.201.0
    no auto-summary
    ip classless
    ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.5
    no ip http server
    access-list 150 permit ip host 192.168.7.5 any
    access-list 150 permit ip host 192.168.7.6 any
    access-list 151 permit ip any any
    dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit
    route-map policyroute permit 10
    match ip address 150
    set interface Serial0/1
    route-map policyroute permit 20
    match ip address 151
    set interface Serial0/0
    line con 0
    line aux 0
    line vty 0 4
    password xxxx
    login
    end

    A couple of items worth noting are the QOS policies themselves.
    This is OK
    class-map match-any VOIP
    match ip dscp ef
    Add this
    class-map match-any VOIP-signalling
    match dscp af31
    match dscp cs3
    Change the policy-map to reflect the changes
    policy-map VOIP-QOS
    class VOIP-signalling
    bandwidth 16
    class VOIP
    priority 24
    class class-default
    fair-queue 256
    random-detect dscp-based
    The bandwidth is meant for 4 concurrent phone conversations so adjust up as needed. The priority is based on my own testing so take it as you may.
    The most important statement is "fair-queue 256", by default you only get 16 queues. Allowing for 256 queues only uses a modest amount of memory so its a simple low impact choice for the router and allows more conversations between devices without interruption.
    Upping the number of queues in your policy would be the best and most important item for your performance problem, next of couse to coercing EIGRP to load balance the T1s properly.
    Brian
    P.S. Create a loopback interface for the ip unnumbered use, cause if the Fa0/0 goes down everything goes down and you can't telnet in from anywhere to look at it. Eliminate the following items from the config by using "no" in fromt of them, a bit of research will tell you why, and start you toward eliminating a few other items.
    service udp-small-servers
    service tcp-small-servers

  • Slow Performance on QueueReciever.recieve() + MQ

    Hi,
    I have been wrecking my brains around this pickle for the last week or so and would appreciate any assistance I could get here.
    Problem Description: Incredibly slow performance when invoking a QueueReciever.recieve() connecting to MQ server version 6
    Benchmarks: 100-900ms per invocation
    Configuration:
    JVM: WS 6's own
    MQ: 6.0
    Application Server: WAS 6
    Managed resources: Queue Connection Factory (queues are dynamically created)
    Runtime artifacts: QueueConnectionFactory, QueueConnection, QueueConnection, QueueSession, QueueSender,
    QueueReciever, TextMessage, in Queue out Queue
    Scenario:
    QueueSender created
    QueueReciever created using a MessageSelector filtering on JMSCorrelationID
    Message is sent to the in queue using QueueSender, embedded with a JMSCorrelationIDImmediately after, a QueueReciever.receive() is invoked listening on the out queue
    Result: VERY slow return from the synchronous block on the receive().
    Given: reply message is put on the out-queue after about 40ms by 3rd party application.
    Again any assistance would be appreciated.
    Message was edited by:
    sg9aeee

    Hi Wietse
    Your RFC communication may be slow because limitations on the Gateway connection parameters.
    Please check the Gateway profile parameters, like max_conn, blocksize etc
    Thanks
    Yatin Bhatt

  • Slow Performance with Business Rules

    Hello,
    Has anyone ever had slow performance with business rules? For example, I attached a calc script to a form and it ran for 20 seconds. I made an exact replica of the calc script in a business rules and it took 30 seconds to run. Also, when creating / modifying business rules in EAS it takes a long time to open or save or attach security - any ideas on things to improve this performance?
    Thanks!

    If you are having issues with performance of assigning access then I am sure there was patch available, it was either a HSS patch or planning patch.
    Cheers
    John
    http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

  • Slow performance of PreparedStatement

    I am having difficulty with extremely slow performance or a relatively simply Microsoft SQL Server 2000 call from my Java applet. Most of the application runs fine, but there are certain parts that are repeatedly giving me a long delay before completing their execution. The code is as follows:
    // Create the try block for the execution of the SQL code
            try{
                // Create the command to be executed
                String command = new String( "select Description, Enabled " );
                command += "from tLineInfo where( Line = ? )";
                // Create the SQL text to be executed
                PreparedStatement get = _connection.prepareStatement( command );
                get.setInt( 1, lineNo );
                // Execute the SQL command
                ResultSet lineInfo = get.executeQuery();
                // Display the information accordingly
                if( lineInfo.next() ){
                    // Populate the user data fields
                    description.setText( lineInfo.getString( "Description" ) );
                          <! more display code here >
    }   // End of if statment
                else{
                    // Clear the user data fields
                    description.setText( " " );
                           <! more display code here >
                }   // End of else statements
                // Close the result set in preparation for the next query
                lineInfo.close();
            }   // End of try block
            catch( Exception e ){
                // Display a dialog box informing the user of the problem
                Object[] options = { "     OK     " };
                JOptionPane.showOptionDialog( null, e.getMessage(),
                        "Error",
                        JOptionPane.OK_OPTION, JOptionPane.ERROR_MESSAGE,
                        null, options, options[ 0 ] ); 
            }   // End of Exception catch
            // Get the related area information
            populateAreaCombo( lineNo );       
    private void populateAreaCombo( int lineNo ){
            // Format the areaComboBox
             try{
                // Create a command to get the devices from the database
                String command = new String( "select Area, [Name], [Description] " );
                command += "from tAreas where( Line = ? )";
                // Create the SQL statement to grab the information, and
                // populate the search parameter
                PreparedStatement getAreas =
                        _connection.prepareStatement( command );
                getAreas.setInt( 1, lineNo );
                // Execute the command
                ResultSet areas = getAreas.executeQuery();
                // Loop through the result set, and add collect the areas
                Vector< String > controlAreas = new Vector();
                while( areas.next() ){
                    // Add the area to the comboBox
                    controlAreas.add( Integer.toString( areas.getInt( "Area" ) ) +
                            " - " + areas.getString( "Name" ) + ": " +
                            areas.getString( "Description" ) );
                }   // End of while loop
                      <! more display code here >
                    The application always seem to pause at the second PrepraredStatement call:
    PreparedStatement getAreas =
                        _connection.prepareStatement( command );This seems to be a very simple operation, and it is not even the execution of the query where the long delay is realized. Rather, it is in the actual creation of the object prior to the execution.
    The delay is very repeatable at this exact statement each time.
    Additionally, of interest, is that the delay is only realized on computers remotely connected to the database. If I run this code on the localhost, then there is no delay. As soon as I distribute it, then the delay is incurred. That being said, there is not a network related issue that I can identify here. I have even isolated the server to be on the network with just one other PC, and the delay still persisted.
    Does anyone have any ideas?
    Thanks

    I can determine where the delay occurs by adding
    dialog boxes at a bunch of different steps, then
    monitoring them for when they appear; a little
    archaic, of course, but an easy way to find this
    out.You should
    1. Get the start time
    2. Get the current time at each step.
    3. Print the results at the end.
    4. Repeat a number of times to average.
    >
    When you say that I should not mix database code with
    display code... What exactly do you mean? To be
    more precise in my description, I was simply setting
    a bunch of different text fields and/or check boxes,
    etc., based on the result set returned. It was not
    as if I was creating a portion of the GUI there or
    something. I am assuming that is an allowable
    practice...
    You should have a class that does nothing but the database work. That class should be used by other classes (like classes that do GUI.)
    I have made little effort to close my resources, and
    sometimes they are not closed at all. When you say
    "resources", what exactly do you mean by that? Are
    you referring to the result sets, for example? I do
    not know of other resources that need to be closed,
    except for the connection to the DB itself. This, I
    have as persistent throughout the duration of the
    user's session.
    You must close result sets, statements and connections. They must be closed in that order.
    I am not running this code on the Internet, but it
    has been designed to be run on a small corporate
    network ( < 10 users). This is why I opted for the
    applet to run the entire application through instead
    of doing more HTML work.That is ok.

  • While creating the UDF in the Marketing Document  ERRor

    Dear to ALL
    Please give me some solution to the my problem
    My problem is
    While i am creating the UDF in the marketing document I am getting the error message 131-183 could not able to create the data base.
    Any one can help me out releated to this problem
    Please  .....................................................
    With regards to all ........................
    Gopi J N
    [email protected]
    [email protected]

    Hi JN,
    There is no limit in number of UDF but in record length. This a SQL        
    Server 2000 limitation which establish 8060 bytes as maximum for a         
    record. This limitation does not exist in MSSQL 2005.                                                                               
    Therefore, in order to be able to add more UDFs you should reduce the      
    size of the existing UDFs or upgrade the system to MSSQL 2005.                                                                               
    Please refer to the SAP note 816387                                                                               
    The solution to this problem is to decrease the size of the                
    User Defined Fields. Either by decreasing the length or changing           
    the definition of "Alpahnumeric" fields to Text, or the last resort        
    is to remove the fields.                                                                               
    All these actions have to be done via the SAP Business One application.    
    The change of field type alphanumeric to Text might influence the          
    performance.

  • Extremely slow performance with Radeon HD 7870

    Hi,
    I am using a number of Adobe programs on my new Windows 8 64 bit system, with 16 gigs of ram, an Intel Core i5 2.67ghz, and AMD Radeon HD 7870 2 gig. All the programs (including After Effects and Illustrator) work very well with the exception of Photoshop CS6 64 bit, which has extremely slow performance with Use Graphics Processor enabled in my preferences (which Photoshop selects by default). If I turn off Use Graphics Processor, the slow performance vanishes. If I change Drawing Mode to Basic, there might be a slightly detectable improvement over Normal and Advanced, but it's still horribly slow. The refresh rate seems to be just a few frames per second. Everything is slow: brushes, zooming, panning, everything.
    I've tried changing the settings I've seen suggested elsewhere: I switched Cache levels to 2, history states to 10, and tile size to 128k. No effect. Photoshop is currently at the default of using 60% of available ram. Efficiency has remained at 100% throughout all my tests. Also, this slow performance has affected me from the moment I installed Photoshop; it didn't crop up after previous good performance. The problem exists regardless of the size or number of documents I have open. Performance is still terrible even when I create a 500 x 500 pixel blank new canvas and try a simple task like drawing with the brush.
    Photoshop is fully up to date, and so are my graphics drivers (Catalyst version 13.1). Any help would be greatly appreciated; at the moment performance is so bad in Photoshop that it's unusable with graphics acceleration enabled. Thanks in advance for replying.
    Photoshop System Info:
    Adobe Photoshop Version: 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00) x64
    Operating System: Windows 8 64-bit
    Version: 6.2
    System architecture: Intel CPU Family:6, Model:14, Stepping:5 with MMX, SSE Integer, SSE FP, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2
    Physical processor count: 4
    Processor speed: 2665 MHz
    Built-in memory: 16379 MB
    Free memory: 13443 MB
    Memory available to Photoshop: 14697 MB
    Memory used by Photoshop: 60 %
    Image tile size: 128K
    Image cache levels: 2
    OpenGL Drawing: Enabled.
    OpenGL Drawing Mode: Advanced
    OpenGL Allow Normal Mode: True.
    OpenGL Allow Advanced Mode: True.
    OpenGL Allow Old GPUs: Not Detected.
    OpenCL Version: 1.2 AMD-APP (1084.4)
    OpenGL Version: 3.0
    Video Rect Texture Size: 16384
    OpenGL Memory: 2048 MB
    Video Card Vendor: ATI Technologies Inc.
    Video Card Renderer: AMD Radeon HD 7800 Series
    Display: 1
    Display Bounds: top=0, left=0, bottom=1080, right=1920
    Video Card Number: 2
    Video Card: AMD Radeon HD 7800 Series
    Driver Version:
    Driver Date:
    Video Card Driver: aticfx64.dll,aticfx64.dll,aticfx64.dll,aticfx32,aticfx32,aticfx32,atiumd64.dll,atidxx64.d ll,atidxx64.dll,atiumdag,atidxx32,atidxx32,atiumdva,atiumd6a.cap,atitmm64.dll
    Video Mode: 1920 x 1080 x 4294967296 colors
    Video Card Caption: AMD Radeon HD 7800 Series
    Video Card Memory: 2048 MB
    Video Card Number: 1
    Video Card: Microsoft Basic Render Driver
    Driver Version: 9.12.0.0
    Driver Date: 20121219000000.000000-000
    Video Card Driver:
    Video Mode:
    Video Card Caption: Microsoft Basic Render Driver
    Video Card Memory: 0 MB
    Serial number: 90970078453021833509
    Application folder: C:\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe Photoshop CS6 (64 Bit)\
    Temporary file path: C:\Users\RAFFAE~1\AppData\Local\Temp\
    Photoshop scratch has async I/O enabled
    Scratch volume(s):
      C:\, 931.5G, 534.8G free
    Required Plug-ins folder: C:\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe Photoshop CS6 (64 Bit)\Required\
    Primary Plug-ins folder: C:\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe Photoshop CS6 (64 Bit)\Plug-ins\
    Additional Plug-ins folder: not set
    Installed components:
       ACE.dll   ACE 2012/06/05-15:16:32   66.507768   66.507768
       adbeape.dll   Adobe APE 2012/01/25-10:04:55   66.1025012   66.1025012
       AdobeLinguistic.dll   Adobe Linguisitc Library   6.0.0  
       AdobeOwl.dll   Adobe Owl 2012/09/10-12:31:21   5.0.4   79.517869
       AdobePDFL.dll   PDFL 2011/12/12-16:12:37   66.419471   66.419471
       AdobePIP.dll   Adobe Product Improvement Program   7.0.0.1686  
       AdobeXMP.dll   Adobe XMP Core 2012/02/06-14:56:27   66.145661   66.145661
       AdobeXMPFiles.dll   Adobe XMP Files 2012/02/06-14:56:27   66.145661   66.145661
       AdobeXMPScript.dll   Adobe XMP Script 2012/02/06-14:56:27   66.145661   66.145661
       adobe_caps.dll   Adobe CAPS   6,0,29,0  
       AGM.dll   AGM 2012/06/05-15:16:32   66.507768   66.507768
       ahclient.dll    AdobeHelp Dynamic Link Library   1,7,0,56  
       aif_core.dll   AIF   3.0   62.490293
       aif_ocl.dll   AIF   3.0   62.490293
       aif_ogl.dll   AIF   3.0   62.490293
       amtlib.dll   AMTLib (64 Bit)   6.0.0.75 (BuildVersion: 6.0; BuildDate: Mon Jan 16 2012 18:00:00)   1.000000
       ARE.dll   ARE 2012/06/05-15:16:32   66.507768   66.507768
       AXE8SharedExpat.dll   AXE8SharedExpat 2011/12/16-15:10:49   66.26830   66.26830
       AXEDOMCore.dll   AXEDOMCore 2011/12/16-15:10:49   66.26830   66.26830
       Bib.dll   BIB 2012/06/05-15:16:32   66.507768   66.507768
       BIBUtils.dll   BIBUtils 2012/06/05-15:16:32   66.507768   66.507768
       boost_date_time.dll   DVA Product   6.0.0  
       boost_signals.dll   DVA Product   6.0.0  
       boost_system.dll   DVA Product   6.0.0  
       boost_threads.dll   DVA Product   6.0.0  
       cg.dll   NVIDIA Cg Runtime   3.0.00007  
       cgGL.dll   NVIDIA Cg Runtime   3.0.00007  
       CIT.dll   Adobe CIT   2.1.0.20577   2.1.0.20577
       CoolType.dll   CoolType 2012/06/05-15:16:32   66.507768   66.507768
       data_flow.dll   AIF   3.0   62.490293
       dvaaudiodevice.dll   DVA Product   6.0.0  
       dvacore.dll   DVA Product   6.0.0  
       dvamarshal.dll   DVA Product   6.0.0  
       dvamediatypes.dll   DVA Product   6.0.0  
       dvaplayer.dll   DVA Product   6.0.0  
       dvatransport.dll   DVA Product   6.0.0  
       dvaunittesting.dll   DVA Product   6.0.0  
       dynamiclink.dll   DVA Product   6.0.0  
       ExtendScript.dll   ExtendScript 2011/12/14-15:08:46   66.490082   66.490082
       FileInfo.dll   Adobe XMP FileInfo 2012/01/17-15:11:19   66.145433   66.145433
       filter_graph.dll   AIF   3.0   62.490293
       hydra_filters.dll   AIF   3.0   62.490293
       icucnv40.dll   International Components for Unicode 2011/11/15-16:30:22    Build gtlib_3.0.16615  
       icudt40.dll   International Components for Unicode 2011/11/15-16:30:22    Build gtlib_3.0.16615  
       image_compiler.dll   AIF   3.0   62.490293
       image_flow.dll   AIF   3.0   62.490293
       image_runtime.dll   AIF   3.0   62.490293
       JP2KLib.dll   JP2KLib 2011/12/12-16:12:37   66.236923   66.236923
       libifcoremd.dll   Intel(r) Visual Fortran Compiler   10.0 (Update A)  
       libmmd.dll   Intel(r) C Compiler, Intel(r) C++ Compiler, Intel(r) Fortran Compiler   12.0  
       LogSession.dll   LogSession   2.1.2.1681  
       mediacoreif.dll   DVA Product   6.0.0  
       MPS.dll   MPS 2012/02/03-10:33:13   66.495174   66.495174
       msvcm80.dll   Microsoft® Visual Studio® 2005   8.00.50727.6910  
       msvcm90.dll   Microsoft® Visual Studio® 2008   9.00.30729.1  
       msvcp100.dll   Microsoft® Visual Studio® 2010   10.00.40219.1  
       msvcp80.dll   Microsoft® Visual Studio® 2005   8.00.50727.6910  
       msvcp90.dll   Microsoft® Visual Studio® 2008   9.00.30729.1  
       msvcr100.dll   Microsoft® Visual Studio® 2010   10.00.40219.1  
       msvcr80.dll   Microsoft® Visual Studio® 2005   8.00.50727.6910  
       msvcr90.dll   Microsoft® Visual Studio® 2008   9.00.30729.1  
       pdfsettings.dll   Adobe PDFSettings   1.04  
       Photoshop.dll   Adobe Photoshop CS6   CS6  
       Plugin.dll   Adobe Photoshop CS6   CS6  
       PlugPlug.dll   Adobe(R) CSXS PlugPlug Standard Dll (64 bit)   3.0.0.383  
       PSArt.dll   Adobe Photoshop CS6   CS6  
       PSViews.dll   Adobe Photoshop CS6   CS6  
       SCCore.dll   ScCore 2011/12/14-15:08:46   66.490082   66.490082
       ScriptUIFlex.dll   ScriptUIFlex 2011/12/14-15:08:46   66.490082   66.490082
       svml_dispmd.dll   Intel(r) C Compiler, Intel(r) C++ Compiler, Intel(r) Fortran Compiler   12.0  
       tbb.dll   Intel(R) Threading Building Blocks for Windows   3, 0, 2010, 0406  
       tbbmalloc.dll   Intel(R) Threading Building Blocks for Windows   3, 0, 2010, 0406  
       updaternotifications.dll   Adobe Updater Notifications Library   6.0.0.24 (BuildVersion: 1.0; BuildDate: BUILDDATETIME)   6.0.0.24
       WRServices.dll   WRServices Friday January 27 2012 13:22:12   Build 0.17112   0.17112
    Required plug-ins:
       3D Studio 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
       Accented Edges 13.0
       Adaptive Wide Angle 13.0
       Angled Strokes 13.0
       Average 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
       Bas Relief 13.0
       BMP 13.0
       Camera Raw 7.3
       Chalk & Charcoal 13.0
       Charcoal 13.0
       Chrome 13.0
       Cineon 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
       Clouds 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
       Collada 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
       Color Halftone 13.0
       Colored Pencil 13.0
       CompuServe GIF 13.0
       Conté Crayon 13.0
       Craquelure 13.0
       Crop and Straighten Photos 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
       Crop and Straighten Photos Filter 13.0
       Crosshatch 13.0
       Crystallize 13.0
       Cutout 13.0
       Dark Strokes 13.0
       De-Interlace 13.0
       Dicom 13.0
       Difference Clouds 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
       Diffuse Glow 13.0
       Displace 13.0
       Dry Brush 13.0
       Eazel Acquire 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
       Embed Watermark 4.0
       Entropy 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
       Extrude 13.0
       FastCore Routines 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
       Fibers 13.0
       Film Grain 13.0
       Filter Gallery 13.0
       Flash 3D 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
       Fresco 13.0
       Glass 13.0
       Glowing Edges 13.0
       Google Earth 4 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
       Grain 13.0
       Graphic Pen 13.0
       Halftone Pattern 13.0
       HDRMergeUI 13.0
       IFF Format 13.0
       Ink Outlines 13.0
       JPEG 2000 13.0
       Kurtosis 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
       Lens Blur 13.0
       Lens Correction 13.0
       Lens Flare 13.0
       Liquify 13.0
       Matlab Operation 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
       Maximum 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
       Mean 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
       Measurement Core 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
       Median 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
       Mezzotint 13.0
       Minimum 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
       MMXCore Routines 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
       Mosaic Tiles 13.0
       Multiprocessor Support 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
       Neon Glow 13.0
       Note Paper 13.0
       NTSC Colors 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
       Ocean Ripple 13.0
       Oil Paint 13.0
       OpenEXR 13.0
       Paint Daubs 13.0
       Palette Knife 13.0
       Patchwork 13.0
       Paths to Illustrator 13.0
       PCX 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
       Photocopy 13.0
       Photoshop 3D Engine 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
       Picture Package Filter 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
       Pinch 13.0
       Pixar 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
       Plaster 13.0
       Plastic Wrap 13.0
       PNG 13.0
       Pointillize 13.0
       Polar Coordinates 13.0
       Portable Bit Map 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
       Poster Edges 13.0
       Radial Blur 13.0
       Radiance 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
       Range 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
       Read Watermark 4.0
       Reticulation 13.0
       Ripple 13.0
       Rough Pastels 13.0
       Save for Web 13.0
       ScriptingSupport 13.1.2
       Shear 13.0
       Skewness 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
       Smart Blur 13.0
       Smudge Stick 13.0
       Solarize 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
       Spatter 13.0
       Spherize 13.0
       Sponge 13.0
       Sprayed Strokes 13.0
       Stained Glass 13.0
       Stamp 13.0
       Standard Deviation 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
       STL 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
       Sumi-e 13.0
       Summation 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
       Targa 13.0
       Texturizer 13.0
       Tiles 13.0
       Torn Edges 13.0
       Twirl 13.0
       Underpainting 13.0
       Vanishing Point 13.0
       Variance 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
       Variations 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
       Water Paper 13.0
       Watercolor 13.0
       Wave 13.0
       Wavefront|OBJ 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
       WIA Support 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
       Wind 13.0
       Wireless Bitmap 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
       ZigZag 13.0
    Optional and third party plug-ins:
       DAZ Studio 3D Bridge 12.0
       DazUpdateScene 12.0
    Plug-ins that failed to load: NONE
    Flash:
       Mini Bridge
       Kuler
    Installed TWAIN devices: NONE

    Great news!
    I followed your suggestion, Noel, and uninstalled my drivers with the Catalyst Uninstall Utility (which I hadn't used before), rebooted, reinstalled Catalyst 13.2 Beta 7, rebooted, deleted the PS Prefs, started PS, and now the performance is radically improved!
    It baffles me why I would need to do a clean driver uninstall in a new system environment that has only ever had this video card, and is only a few months old, but that action seems to be what's improved the situation. Note that because I deleted the PS preferences, the good performance now occurs with the default Use Graphics Processor enabled, and Drawing Mode set to Advanced (with every feature in the Advanced dialog checked except 30bit display).
    Having no reference point, I can't tell for sure if performance is as good as it theoretically ought to be for my system specs, but using the standard 13px brush is only slightly laggy behind the cursor, even if I become reckless and squiggle on the canvas violently. It wasn't just sluggish response before: Photoshop seemed to be in pain trying to draw the line segments as it laboured to catch up to the cursor. That is pretty much gone now.
    Much more tellingly, zooming and panning the canvas is like it ought to be, responsive and clean, more or less like it was for me in CS4 with my old Nvidia 9600GT. The poor performance with zooming and panning was the most worrying aspect of the issue. It's a great relief to see these working more properly now.
    I have to confess I'm a little embarrassed to have drug you through all this hassle only to discover that something as rudimentary as properly cleaning out the drivers would be the apparent solution. I never would have imagined that doing that, with such a new and stable system, would make any difference, since I don't have a legacy of older drivers dotting my hard drive. In any event, I'm really grateful that you guys took the time to try to help me.
    In the interest of completeness, here's the relevant portion of my system info after doing the reinstall steps I mentioned above:
    Adobe Photoshop Version: 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00) x64
    Operating System: Windows 8 64-bit
    Version: 6.2
    System architecture: Intel CPU Family:6, Model:14, Stepping:5 with MMX, SSE Integer, SSE FP, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2
    Physical processor count: 4
    Processor speed: 2665 MHz
    Built-in memory: 16379 MB
    Free memory: 13680 MB
    Memory available to Photoshop: 14695 MB
    Memory used by Photoshop: 60 %
    Image tile size: 1024K
    Image cache levels: 4
    OpenGL Drawing: Enabled.
    OpenGL Drawing Mode: Advanced
    OpenGL Allow Normal Mode: True.
    OpenGL Allow Advanced Mode: True.
    OpenGL Allow Old GPUs: Not Detected.
    OpenCL Version: 3.0
    OpenGL Version: 3.0
    Video Rect Texture Size: 16384
    OpenGL Memory: 2048 MB
    Video Card Vendor: ATI Technologies Inc.
    Video Card Renderer: AMD Radeon HD 7800 Series
    Display: 1
    Display Bounds: top=0, left=0, bottom=1080, right=1920
    Video Card Number: 2
    Video Card: AMD Radeon HD 7800 Series
    Driver Version:
    Driver Date:
    Video Card Driver: aticfx64.dll,aticfx64.dll,aticfx64.dll,aticfx32,aticfx32,aticfx32,atiumd64.dll,atidxx64.d ll,atidxx64.dll,atiumdag,atidxx32,atidxx32,atiumdva,atiumd6a.cap,atitmm64.dll
    Video Mode: 1920 x 1080 x 4294967296 colors
    Video Card Caption: AMD Radeon HD 7800 Series
    Video Card Memory: 2048 MB
    Video Card Number: 1
    Video Card: Microsoft Basic Render Driver
    Driver Version: 12.100.17.0
    Driver Date: 20130226000000.000000-000
    Video Card Driver:
    Video Mode:
    Video Card Caption: Microsoft Basic Render Driver
    Video Card Memory: 0 MB
    As you can see, the Microsoft Basic Render Driver still appears as a Video Card in the list. This presumably has something to do with Windows 8, and I really don't know if its presence here is still a sign that my card is not being used to its optimal capability. I have a hunch that the slight lag that I am still experiencing with the brush when Use Graphics Processor is on -- totally absent with the acceleration turned off -- implies that Photoshop is still unable to take maximum advantage of my card. I would assume that the brush tool should be more responsive with acceleration on than off, in a rig without any issues, but that's just assumption on my part. If you turn off Use Graphics Processor on your systems, is the brush tool more or less responsive?
    But again, panning the canvas with the hand tool is now extremely responsive, without any screen tearing or visible lag, and that's a massive improvement over the total meltdown of performance I was suffering from before.
    Thanks again very much for your help. I'm grateful to all of you who took the time to chime in.

  • Powerbook painfully slow performance

    Recently my powerbook has been running unusably slow. Here's a timeline:
    - Noticed slow opening of applications, saving, switching from application to application, browsing folders through finder.
    - Computer kept freezing after 1-10 minutes of use.
    - Checked RAM in system profiler - 1GB RAM showing 512 MB.
    - Removed RAM and restarted (new RAM being sent to me at present).
    - Freezing problem stopped. Slow performance improved for 2-5 minutes after startup but after 10 minutes, back to same old slow usage.
    - Checked hard drive, repaired permissions, did macjanitor cleanup.
    - Hardware check from startup DVD showed no problems. SMART check OK'd hard drive.
    - Archive and re-install tiger and updated to 10.4.9.
    - Activity monitor shows %CPU usage as fairly normal. Kernel_task is using about 720MB of virtual memory under very light/no user usage.
    - Created a new user and performance normal in new user, leading me to believe that the problem is related to user library and possibly preferences.
    - Put preferences folder on desktop and started putting my preferences back into user library folder bit by bit, restarting and testing. The performance would be better each time but hard to test as I have to wait at least 10 mins to test each time - time consuming business.
    Is there any way to narrow down which preference file is causing the problem without painstakingly re-adding preference files one by one to the user library folder, waiting 10 mins and testing?
    Otherwise, could the diagnosis above be due to something else all together. Been through the discussions and can't get anything to work so far. The RAM was the cause of the freezing problem, but seems to have brought on the slowness problem.
    Any help would be much appreciated, thanks Graeme.

    Graeme:
    If you have not done so recently run Unix Maintenance (CRON cleaning). Download and install MacJanitor and run all tests.
    Dr. Smoke's FAQ Tuning Mac OS X Performance has some hints you may find helpful.
    Regualar maintenance also helps performance. Take a look at the following articles:
    Mac OS X 10.3/10.4: System maintenance
    Macintosh OS X Routine Maintenance
    Maintaining OS X
    Good luck.
    cornelius

  • Hangs, Slow performance, Long launch, etc

    Hi all,
    Okay, I have been working on this for a while, thought I'd bring it to your attention.
    FCPX is getting slower and slower, taking 5 to 10 minutes to launch, takes 5+ minutes to load a 3 minute project (of optimized media), hangs for 3 to five minutes every few minutes or so (with beachball) with no background processes (like rendering) active.
    The MOST interesting thing I have found in researching the problem is that when launching fcpx, AND when fcpx hangs, the four processors are not being utilized, only one processor shows activity at those points, and that processor is peaked at 100% usage.  The remaining three cores show no load at all.  FCP will hang like this for three to five minutes (with only 1 core being used), then will finally release and there will be partial usage of all four cores....  then a little while later, it will do it again.
    BEFORE I realized that there was odd behavior with the processor utilization, here is what I have done to try to fix the problem (without success):
    - all sync services are turned off
    - all security and virus software off
    - All disk protection software off
    - Tossed render files
    - created new admin user
    - reinstalled FCPX
    - tossed prefs
    - disabled third party plug-ins
    - disconnected all peripherals
    - Disk Utility permissions and disk repair
    - removed the few extra projects and events
    Specs on my computer.....
    Mac OS 10.6.8
    Model Name:          Mac Pro
      Model Identifier:          MacPro1,1
      Processor Name:          Dual-Core Intel Xeon
      Processor Speed:          3 GHz
      Number Of Processors:          2
      Total Number Of Cores:          4
      L2 Cache (per processor):          4 MB
      Memory:          14 GB
      Bus Speed:          1.33 GHz
    ATI Radeon HD 5770:
    Graphics Card:          ATI Radeon HD 5770
      Type:          GPU
      Bus:          PCIe
      Slot:          Slot-1
      PCIe Lane Width:          x16
      VRAM (Total):          1024 MB

    It's an awesome application - you just need to see why it's not working well on your system.
    First, check the spec of your iMac against the system requirements:
    http://www.apple.com/finalcutpro/specs/
    Particularly your graphics card. If it's listed here, it's not suitable:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4664
    If you are getting crashes, there is some conflict on the OS. Create a new (admin) user account on your system and use FCP X from there - if it runs a lot better, there's a conflict and a clean install would be recommended.
    Other ways to improve performance:
    Create optimised media.
    Hide Waveforms at all times when you don't need them (both in Browser and Storyline / Timeline). They take up a lot of processor power.
    Create folders in the Project library and put any projects you are not working on currently, in there. (Twirl it closed to hide them).
    Move your Projects and Events to an external HD (make sure it's formatted OS Extended - with journaled on or off) and run from there.
    Do you have FCS or FC 7 installed on the same partition as FCP X - not advised by Apple.
    Keep Projects Short - the longer the project, the slower FCP X loads, works, and shuts down.
    Andy

  • BC_MSG slow performance

    I experience slow performance in a SAP PI 7.1EHP1 SP05 installation. The BC_MSG table contains about 550.000 messages. I archive and delete message that are 10 days old. The environment is Redhat Linux 5.5 64bit with 16GB RAM and oracle 10.2.0.4.<br>
    <br>
    The problem is when I want to query all message containg error in the last 7 days or more. It needs about 5 minutes to respond and sometimes more that ends with request timeout from ICM. I shrink the tables, rebuild the indexes, restart the system many times, apply latest service pack (SP06) but the performance remains unchanged.<br>
    <br>
    The query that is executed is the following:<br>
    <br>
    <pre>
    SELECT "MSG_ID","DIRECTION","REF_TO_MSG_ID","CORRELATION_ID","SEQUENCE_ID",
      "SEQUENCE_NBR","CONN_NAME","MSG_TYPE","STATUS","TO_PARTY_NAME",
      "TO_PARTY_TYPE","FROM_PARTY_NAME","FROM_PARTY_TYPE","TO_SERVICE_NAME",
      "TO_SERVICE_TYPE","FROM_SERVICE_NAME","FROM_SERVICE_TYPE","ACTION_NAME",
      "ACTION_TYPE","DELIVERY_SEMANTICS","SENT_RECV_TIME","TRAN_DELV_TIME",
      "SCHEDULE_TIME","PERSIST_UNTIL","TIMES_FAILED","RETRIES","RETRY_INTERVAL",
      "MSG_PROTOCOL","TRANSPORT","ADDRESS","CREDENTIAL","TRAN_HEADER",
      "VALID_UNTIL","NODE","ERROR_CODE","ERROR_CATEGORY","PP_USER","PP_HASH",
      "VERS_NBR","VERS_WAS_EDITED","PRIORITY_TYPE","PRIORITY"
    FROM
    "BC_MSG" WHERE "BC_MSG"."MSG_ID" IS NOT NULL AND ("STATUS" = :1 OR "STATUS" =
       :2) AND "SENT_RECV_TIME" >= :3 AND "SENT_RECV_TIME" <= :4 ORDER BY 21 DESC
    </pre>
    <br>
    Parameters:<br>
    :1 = 'FAIL'<br>
    :2 = 'NDLV'<br>
    :3 = 2011-03-01 08:06:02.34 (example)<br>
    :4 = 2011-03-02 08:06:02.34 (example)<br>
    <br>
    <br>
    This statement is executed for each day for the time interval I specify (e.g. 7 days of the week if the interval is 'Last 7 Days'). I don't know why they don't use one SQL for the specified interval.<br>
    <br>
    When I enable trace in the Open SQL monitor the execution time I see is very disappointing, about 22 - 46 seconds for each query. I also enable SQL trace in Oracle database and the results I get are the following:<br>
    <br>
    <pre>
    call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
    Parse        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Execute      2      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Fetch        2     10.74      79.70      50473      62752          0           6
    total        4     10.74      79.70      50473      62752          0           6
    Misses in library cache during parse: 0
    Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
    Parsing user id: 32
    Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
       Event waited on                             Times   Max. Wait  Total Waited
       Waited  -
      db file sequential read                     50473        0.15         72.90
      SQL*Net message to client                       2        0.00          0.00
      SQL*Net more data to client                     1        0.00          0.00
      SQL*Net message from client                     2        0.00          0.00
    </pre>
    <br>
    The 'db file sequential read' is what worries me but I don't know what to do.<br>
    <br>
    Also I tried the same query using Db Visualizer and the jdbc jar file. The response was much better and the execution plan was different as you can see in sql trace results:<br>
    <br>
    <pre>
    call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
    Parse        1      0.01       0.01          0          0          0           0
    Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Fetch        1      0.00       0.00          0          7          0           0
    total        3      0.01       0.01          0          7          0           0
    Misses in library cache during parse: 1
    Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
    Parsing user id: 32
    Rows     Row Source Operation
          0  SORT ORDER BY (cr=7 pr=0 pw=0 time=636 us)
          0   INLIST ITERATOR  (cr=7 pr=0 pw=0 time=487 us)
          0    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID BC_MSG (cr=7 pr=0 pw=0 time=459 us)
          0     INDEX RANGE SCAN I_BC_MSG_STATUS_SENT (cr=7 pr=0 pw=0 time=347 us)(object id 96079)
    Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
       Event waited on                             Times   Max. Wait  Total Waited
       Waited  -
      SQL*Net message to client                       2        0.00          0.00
      SQL*Net message from client                     2        0.18          0.19
    </pre>
    <br>
    The I_BC_MSG_STATUS_SENT index that scans is the index using the columns STATUS, SENT_RECV_TIME I created to see if performance is better.<br>
    <br>
    Generally the system works fine. I handles 50.000 messages per day with no delays. But the monitoring performance is annoying. I need your expertise on that.<br>

    You, also, have waaaay too many user startup/Login items.
    You need to pare these down to the apps you really need to have launched at startup and running in the background.
    Add or remove automatic items
    Choose Apple menu > System Preferences, then click Users & Groups.
    Select your user account, then click Login Items.
    Do one of the following:
    Click Add below the list on the right, select an app, document, folder, or disk, then click Add.If you don’t want an item’s windows to be visible after login, select Hide. (Hide does not apply to servers, which always appear in the Finder after login.)
    Select the name of the item you want to prevent from opening automatically, then click Delete below the list on the right.
    You need to make sure to update all of your third party software if there are OS X Mavericks updates that can be applied.
    You may need to go the third party developers' websites if there are no updates through the Mac App Store.
    Make sure all of your Web browser Internet plugins, extensions and add-ons are updated to recent versions, also.

  • Slow performance from Premiere Elements 10

    Hi guys,
    I recently purchased Premiere Elements and Photoshop Elements 10 to edit some wedding video.  I am experiencing some slow performance with the software (and random lockups for that matter).  My CPU usage shows nearly nil when using the program and with IE with multiple tabs open at the moment and the Premiere Elements open, I am showing that I still have about 5GB of RAM free.  However, I am still getting some slow performance from the software with random lockups.  The video came from a sony HDR-CX700V camera, it is all 1080P video and there is about 3 hours worth of footage added to my current project.  I imported the footage by just dragging and dropping the video folder contents into the "Project" tab within the program.
    An example of the slow performance I get is this.  I added a Title card to start before the video.  When I hit play to see how it looks, the preview screen shows nothing, but you can see the time scrolling, then the video suddenly starts, but the video is really choppy.  I also had a heck of a time just adding that title card, as when I did it the program crashed once and locked up a couple of times.  Any ideas how I can fix this?  What other information would you need to help me further troubleshoot the problem?
    My system is has an i7-720 with 8GB of RAM and an NVIDIA GTX260M with the latest driver from NVIDIA. 
    TIA guys!

    One - your project must match your video... if you have a red line over the timeline immediately after importing the video, your project is wrong
    Read Bill Hunt on a file type as WRAPPER http://forums.adobe.com/thread/440037
    What is a CODEC... a Primer http://forums.adobe.com/thread/546811
    What CODEC is INSIDE that file? http://forums.adobe.com/thread/440037
    Report back with the codec details of your file, use the programs below... a screen shot works well to SHOW people what you are doing
    For PC http://www.headbands.com/gspot/ or http://mediainfo.sourceforge.net/en
    For Mac http://mediainspector.massanti.com/
    http://blogs.adobe.com/premiereprotraining/2011/02/red-yellow-and-green-render-bars.html
    If you have a red line over the timeline after importing a video and before adding any effects... your project is wrong for your video... read above about codecs
    Once you know exactly what it is you are editing, report back with that information... and your project setting, and if there is a red line above the video in the timeline, which indicates a mismatch between video and project
    Two - how many hard drives do you have, and how is your project configured?
    My 3 hard drives to edit AVCHD are configured as...
    1 - 320Gig Boot for Win7 64bit Pro and all program installs
    2 - 320Gig data for Win7 paging swap file and video project files
    When I create a project on #2 drive, the various work files follow,
    so my boot drive is not used for the media cache folder and files
    3 - 1Terabyte data for all video files... input & output files (*)
    (*) for 4 drives, drive 3 all source files & drive 4 all output files
    Search Microsoft to find out how to redirect your Windows paging swap file
    http://search.microsoft.com/search.aspx?mkt=en-US&setlang=en-US

  • InDesign CC 2014 very slow performance when dragging images and changing text

    InDesign CC 2014 very slow performance when dragging images and changing text.
    Running on 2010 Macpro 2.4GHz. 8GB RAM. Any solutions? I've read through many forums on this and tried several fixes.

    Have exact same issue on  my Windows 7 machine. Resetting preferences is a workaround.
    So I start InDesign whilst holding down these keys.
    Ctrl + Alt + Shift (Windows) or Cmd + Ctrl + Opt + Shift (Mac)
    Whilst inDesign is usable again with this fix- I have to do it every time so it trashes all my preferences so NOT GOOD long term fix. Otherwise InDesign freezes and can only be stopped by forcing a quit.
    I have manually deleted the preference files and I have created a brand new admin account - but still no luck - will be onto support tomorrow

Maybe you are looking for