Slow performance in some areas

Dear all,
System details: nw2004s (sp10), backend system CRM 5.0 (sp10).
When we open a new case in case management page through portal, it takes long time to open.
At the same time, when i checked in backend sm50, work process, it takes 110-120 seconds to complete the activity.
On work process trace whenever the activity is done this trace is generated which is a warning:
J Sun Jan 21 11:26:35 2007
J Warning com.sap.vmc.session.persistence.SessionStore       [main] MaxSessionSize init: The setting of default max session size ha
J s been failed the size of 20MB will be used as default.
J Info    com.sap.vmc.session.Manager                        [main] Using <> as storage provider for SessionManagement.: com.sap
J .vmc.session.impl.DwjSessionStore
M
M Sun Jan 21 11:37:15 2007
M ***LOG R2G=> ThPlgTimeout, Timeout () [thxxplg.c    5377]
M
M Sun Jan 21 11:38:14 2007
M ***LOG R2G=> ThPlgTimeout, Timeout () [thxxplg.c    5377]
While other activities through portal are working fine, this problem is in case management only.
Can anyone suggest me.
Thanks
Imran Hasware

Hi Imran,
while I have no solution to the problem you posted this January, I see that you have integrated Case Management into the Portal? May I ask how you did this?
We are currently using Case Management in R/3 and I have the requirement to integrate CRM into the portal. I read that there is a possibility to display records, but have found nothing yet for cases.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Cheers,
Nils

Similar Messages

Very slow performance in every area after massive data load

Hi,
I'm new to Siebel. I had a call from customer saying that virtually every aspect of the application (login, etc) is slow after they did a massive data loading ~ around 15GB of data.
Could you please help to point out what would be the best practice for this massive data loading exercise? All the table statistics are up to date.
Anyone encountered this kind of problem before?

Hello,
Siebel CRM is a highly customizable customer relationship management solution. There are number of customizations (scripting, workflow, web services,...) and integrations (custom c++, java, ERP system,...) that can cause Siebel performance issues.
Germain Monitoring v1.8.5 can help you -clean-up- all your siebel performance issues (5 min after installation, which can take between 4hours and 10 days whether it is to be used against your siebel dev/qa or prod environment) and then monitor your siebel production system at every layer of your infrastructure, at the siebel user click & back-end transaction levels and either solve or identify the root-cause of siebel performance issues, 24x7.
Germain Monitoring Software (currently version 1.8.5) helps siebel customers 1)faster solve siebel performance issues introduced by customizations and 2)effectively solve siebel performance issues before business is impacted once siebel is on production.
Customers like NetApp, J.M Smucker, Alltel/Verizon,...have saved hundred of thousands of dollars using Germain Monitoring software.
Let us know whether you would like to discuss this further...good luck w/ these issues,
Regards,
Yannick Germain
GERMAIN SOFTWARE LLC
Siebel Performance Software
21 Columbus Avenue, Suite 221
San Francisco, CA 94111, USA
Cell: +1-415-606-3420
Fax: +1-415-651-9683
[email protected]
http://www.germainsoftware.com

Some performance counter objects are not available for a 32-bit process on 64-bit versions of Windows Server 2012 standard

When we try to gather performance counter information for a 32-bit process on a 64-bit computer that is running Microsoft Windows Server 2012, all our performance counter objects are not available with 32 bit perfmon application (C:\Windows\SysWOW64\perfmon.exe)
I didn't notified any errors while registering our counter objects or while running Perfmon.exe
Note: Same counter objects are available and working fine with Windows Server 2008 R2.
for diagnostic our counters on WIN2012, ran command as follows:
cd c:\windows\sysWOW64
lodctr /Q
I am able to see all our counter objects on response and infact all were shown as enabled, as shown below
Appreciate quiclk response with solution or clues to diagnose it more details.
Thanks & Regards,
Sudhakar Rudra

Hi,
Thanks for your reply.
I hope you understood our problem.
same our system counter objects (ver x), we able to browse from Perfmon 32 bit app on Windows 7, Windows 2008 R2 (64bit) OS but not on Windows 2012.
I am able to see all counter objects registered as follows (same at HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet001\Services\HMI Alarm Class\Performance,
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet002\Services\HMI Alarm Class\Performance
and
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\HMI Alarm Class\Performance)
Only difference I observed that "Disable Performance Counters" were set to 4 in Windows 2012 OS unlike other windows 7 64bit OS and there is no differnece for remaining all entires.
I tried setting that "Disable Performance Counters" value to "0", but some how they get reset to "4", no luck..
I think "Disable Performance Counters" value either "0", or "4", should not matter for browsing our counters with 32bit bit perfmon applicaiton.
Do you see any issues of registry entries. ?
On what basis perfomance monitor list few enabled counters?
How can we add our counters manually to perfomance monitor?

Yesterday all web sites were fine, now some websites are fine, some are slow, some do not look correctly

I am using a Dell inspiron 1525, running Windows XP, Firefox 5.0 both OS and Firefox have the latest patches and fixes applied. Yesterday all websites were loading, responding and appearing properly. Today some are working properly and some are slow and do not appear correctly. No updates were applied in the last three days. To make matters even more confusing, When I us IE, the sites work correctly. I believe it is something with this laptop because Firefox 5.0 works just fine with all sites on a different machine which runs Windows 7. I tried re-installing Firefox 5.0, going back to 4.0.2, 4.0.1, all resulting in the same outcome. I ran a virus scan and nothing was found.
Any insight you can provide would be appreciated.

Hi,
Many site issues can be caused by corrupt cookies or cache. In order to try to fix these problems, the first step is to clear both cookies and the cache.
Note: ''This will temporarily log you out of all sites you're logged in to.''
To clear cache and cookies do the following:
#Go to Firefox > History > Clear recent history or (if no Firefox button is shown) go to Tools > Clear recent history.
#Under "Time range to clear", select "Everything".
#Now, click the arrow next to Details to toggle the Details list active.
#From the details list, check ''Cache'' and ''Cookies'' and uncheck everything else.
#Now click the ''Clear now'' button.
Further information can be found in the [[Clear your cache, history and other personal information in Firefox]] article.
Did this fix your problems? Please report back to us!

Slow performance of discoverer portlets

Hi,
I am running into slow performance of a particular page in portal, there are multiple sites hosted on the portal but these all have static text and are very quick to load but the one page with discoverer portlets and a web-clippping portlet is taking ages. If I run these reports on their own they are instant. Has anyone had similar problems with 9.0.2 portal and the discoverer reports ? I tried to identify a particular report that may be the culprit by deleting them one by one and to no avail. After a few hours effort I found the design mode was hanging as well. Again, just for this 1 page.
There are 3 tabs on this page with about 4 report portlets and 1 web-clipping portlet.
Thanks for any help,
Brandon

Thanks for the help.
Seems to have been resolved although I'm not sure if thats the end of the story. Will wait and see.....
So far apparently a port conflict of some sort in the discoverer config was causing it to hang and then also other system demands on the network and server housing the discoverer end-user layer were also causing problems.
No error messages unfortunately......

Slow performance, weird memory usage, hanging when closing safari tab

Hi, i recently noticed that my MacBoo Pro was with low performance after some hours of use.
I'm a heavy user, so I try to monitor what might be causing it. What i note was:
After restart (or fresh start), my computer was ok;
I use applications like adobe Lightroom and VMWare Fusion;
Then I star feeling like Safari was too slow to open pages - I thought it was the internet link first, but even local webpages are slow. I notice that when a click to close a tab, it take almost 2 sec to do it. The same when click to open any link on that page.
I start the activity monitor, but my proc usage are low. Then, I notice the (weird) memory usage:
Take a look at "memory used". I closed all applications before take this screenshot. i've trying to identify what is consuming this memory, but.. no success.
Anyone has any idea what can might be causing it?
My HW information:
all my apps are updated.

Memory usage was normal when you took that screenshot.
When you have the problem, note the exact time: hour, minute, second.
These instructions must be carried out as an administrator. If you have only one user account, you are the administrator.
Launch the Console application in any of the following ways:
☞ Enter the first few letters of its name into a Spotlight search. Select it in the results (it should be at the top.)
☞ In the Finder, select Go ▹ Utilities from the menu bar, or press the key combination shift-command-U. The application is in the folder that opens.
☞ Open LaunchPad. Click Utilities, then Console in the icon grid.
The title of the Console window should be All Messages. If it isn't, select
          SYSTEM LOG QUERIES ▹ All Messages
from the log list on the left. If you don't see that list, select
          View ▹ Show Log List
from the menu bar at the top of the screen.
Each message in the log begins with the date and time when it was entered. Scroll back to the time you noted above.
Select the messages entered from then until the end of the episode, or until they start to repeat, whichever comes first.
Copy the messages to the Clipboard by pressing the key combination command-C. Paste into a reply to this message by pressing command-V.
The log contains a vast amount of information, almost all of it useless for solving any particular problem. When posting a log extract, be selective. A few dozen lines are almost always more than enough.
Please don't indiscriminately dump thousands of lines from the log into this discussion.
Please don't post screenshots of log messages—post the text.
Some private information, such as your name, may appear in the log. Anonymize before posting.

Slow Performance - Java Related?

This is an old box that I bought used recently, but the system install is recent. The system performs very slowly - about 50% of the speed of comparable Mac's in the XBench database. If I use Xupport to manully run "All" of the system maintenance crons I get some improvement, but it quickly goes back to being slow.
Looking at my logs I have a "boat load" of Java errors under CrashReporter; there will be a string of "JavaNativeCrash_pidXXX.log" entries - many of them, as follows:
An unexpected exception has been detected in native code outside the VM.
Unexpected Signal : Bus Error occurred at PC=0x908611EC
Function=[Unknown.]
Library=/usr/lib/libobjc.A.dylib
NOTE: We are unable to locate the function name symbol for the error
just occurred. Please refer to release documentation for possible
reason and solutions.
Many of the line entries that follow, but not all of them, refer to SargentD2OL, which is a Java app, which I installed, but it did not work properly so I removed it. Yet I continue to get Java errors that refer to this now non-existant app.
I have read that Java apps use a lot of resources, and that D2OL in particular uses a lot of resources. Can my slow performance problem be Java related? If so, any idea of how I can fix this problem?
G4 AGP Graphics Mac OS X (10.3.9) 500 MHz, 512M RAM

Sorry to take so long to respond, but other issues in life have demanded my attention.
None of the solutions given have had any affect. My Java folder has both a 1.3.1 and a 1.4.2 app - the Java Update 2 will not reinstall because it sees an up-to-date app in the folder. But reading the update file it says the older Java will be removed - but it is still there. Problem?
On XBench the system scores a 9 to 10, while similar boxes on the XBench database score around 18 to 20. My cpu, memory, and video scores are very low. The HD through-put scores are the only ones that are normal. TechTool Pro 4 finds no problems. I have removed the memory sticks one at a time and retested after each cycle - no difference.
I have two drives, each with a 10.3.9 install. One works fine, scores around a 17 on XBench, the other scores a 9 to 10. So it appears to be a software problem. The slower install is a drive from a iMac G3 that has been moved to the G4 - are there issues with this?
My favored drive is the prior G3 one (newer and faster than the other drive that system tests faster in XBench) - it has my profile and all my info on it. It worked fine in the G3 - no problems.
Thanks for the help,
G4 AGP Graphics Mac OS X (10.3.9) 500 MHz, 512M RAM, ATI 8500

Slow performance on a iMac 27" (maybe originated by the HDD)

Hello,
Well, I've had my iMac for 10 months now, but have never really paid attention to its performance since it was my first Mac and I was upgrading from a quite old computer, so it obviously proved to be a far superior machine.
However, I noticed the problem when I started to be more critical with my machine's performance (this triggered by the fact that I bought, some months after, a MacBook Air which flies beyond time and space). Curious about this, I requested a friend to do a benchmark test with Xbench resulting in his machine (another iMac 27” with comparable specs) clearly outperforming mine. Even the Air, with its slower processor and smaller RAM, has a relatively close performance.
Additionally, I have started to notice how the computer takes a long time to start-up and, after the desktop is “layed out”, it takes a lot of time before the machine becomes “responsive” (I usually try to start Mail and Google Chrome as soon as the pointer pops in!) with the final result that I have to wait in company of the beach ball for quite some seconds (half a minute) and even after the application had started, I can still hear the HDD working it as if there would be no tomorrow! And then, it is slooooow. Funnily enough, “tougher” applications like Photoshop or Illustrator don’t seem to have as many problems, relatively speaking.
A little bit on the background info: I have two partitions: one for Bootcamp (since I was migrating from Windows, I had some software that I wanted to use there: Matlab and Office, basically, and then some smaller Windows-only programs).
Derived from the benchmark test, I think I might have isolated the problem to the HDD (not sure though!).
SO THE QUESTIONS ARE:
1. How can I verify that the slow performance is due to the HDD being defective/badly configured/etc.?
2. Has the Windows Bootcamp Partition any effect on my machine’s performance under MacOS? (I would assume not, but you never know!). I have more than 1.3 TB free space left
3. What kind of corrective measures should I take?
4. Any other type of advice will be warmly welcome: I will try to do some PRAM and SMC resets but I am not counting on it. I had also ran the disk utilities and there were no permission errors (not so sure what this means, but I’ve read that it is supposed to be good news.)
5. Any extra info you might need, lemme know!
Greetz,
Víctor.
PS: Sorry for the loooong post. I tried to be thorough!

1. How can I verify that the slow performance is due to the HDD being defective/badly configured/etc.?
Run Apple Hardware Test: http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1509
2. Has the Windows Bootcamp Partition any effect on my machine’s performance under MacOS? (I would assume not, but you never know!). I have more than 1.3 TB free space left
Probably not but 1.3TB of free space left on the total HD is not enough for OS X, OS X needs a minimum of 10-15% free space! If you mean 1.3TB of Windows space I'd recommend posting that question in the Boot Camp forum.
3. What kind of corrective measures should I take?
If the drive is failing per the AHT then it's covered by warranty and will need to be replaced. Remember back up!!!!!!!!!!
4. Any other type of advice will be warmly welcome: I will try to do some PRAM and SMC resets but I am not counting on it. I had also ran the disk utilities and there were no permission errors (not so sure what this means, but I’ve read that it is supposed to be good news.)
Can't hurt, make sure you read the instructions carefully and execute the tests exactly as they are described for Intel based iMacs.
5. Any extra info you might need, lemme know!
If you no longer have a need for Windows on your iMac I'd recommend removing that partition using Boot Camp Assistant. That may correct your problems.
I would also recommend checking if System Preferences - Startup Disk and see if your internal HD is highlighted as the Startup Disk.
In addition I would recommend checking your Login Items (System Preferences - Accounts - Login Items) and delete any applications you don't need launching at Login.

Slow performance-CS4, why?

Hi,
I have a Q9450 proccessor, Vista 64 bit with 4GB ram. ever since I installed CS4, things are going a bit slow in PPRO, and I don't understand why?
For example, scrubbing or playback in the timeline have become painfully slow, and sometimes, I see leftovers of the marker, as if I don't have enough memory (it's hard to explain in writing... I hope
you got it). Overall, all the symptoms shows I don't have enough memory, because of the slow performance, but it doesn't make sense, cause I have 4 GB, and in CS3 it all worked great.
Any suggetsions?

worked just great...
I don't get it.
I googled a bit and found this thread:
http://dvxuser.com/V6/showthread.php?t=149929&page=4
read what Dave Helmly at Adobe had to say (below):
YES we use all Cores for playback , effects, and rendering for both Mac and Windows.
I highly recommend switching to Vista 64 if you are a Windows user (Mac guys are OK with 10.5.4 or higher) Vista 64 will allow Production Premium CS4 to run using more than 4GB of Ram (XP/Vista32 Limitation). As with most NLEs, there are several programs running at the same time to give you the NLE experience. CS4 now allows each process to take up to 4Gb of RAM. If you have 16GB of RAM, then 4 processes can take up to 4GB each. This is a HUGE advantage over CS3. What are some examples of processes? DynamicLink, AfterServer, Photoshop Server, Adobe Media Encoder, Titler, Playback, Capture, Importer, and many more. I tell most people to count on buying 8GB minium.
So maybe I have to add more ram, in order CS4 to run properly...
Roy

Slow Performance Weeks after Encryption

I encrypted my organization's laptops several weeks ago and did not return them to users until after I could tell by device performance that the bulk encrypting task had completed. I have two users that are experiencing extremely slow performance on their systems. When the users are typing anything like a Word document, upon each keystroke they see the Windows 7 "circle" icon at the mouse cursor. This seems to come and go several times over the week, and every few days we are getting a request to resolve the issue but after restarting the behavior may not act up anymore.
I found a TID suggesting to change HKLM\SOFTWARE\Novell-FDE\Parameters\ThrottleEncryption to a lower level like Idle or BelowNormal. Is there anything else that I should also try? Thanks!

Yes, but nothing from Novell yet - I will keep pushing them forward and let you know if I get some results.
-j-
>>> Jim Koerner<[email protected]> 8.3.2013 15:29 >>>
Sounds like you have a SR going on this also. Have you heard anything on a
fix? Mine has been stagnant for a while and I just bumped it to see if
anything has been figured out or if more info is needed from my side. Hope
to here something soon. This is a pretty severe problem especially when it
happens multiple times to a machine.
Jim Koerner
Server - ZCM 11.2.2 MU1 and Internal Database on Win2008R2x64
Client - ZCM 11.2.2 MU1 on Win7SP1x64 and WinXPx32
"Jouko Oksanen" <Jouko.Oksanen_re@move_efore.fi> wrote in message
news:513713E9.13C8.00F6.0@move_efore.fi...
Hi,
We have had (maybe) similar issues with our FDE setup that FDE policy
assigned devices tend to loose the policy and start to do disk decryption
and suddenly get once again the policy back and start to encrypt again. This
could be found from "ZCM agent, Full disk encryption, about, Agents status,
Settings, on section "Emergency Recovery Information" you could see events
'Zone Changed' what according to Novell support meant that the policy was
"re-initialized / changed" even our policy counter have not changed = policy
got lost in some phase.
We are now suspecting that there is some issues with the policy service that
plays tricks on us.
-j-
>>> Jim Koerner<[email protected]> 20.2.2013 19:57
>>> >>>
In ZCC on the devices that you are having issues with look at the Emergency
Recovery tab and see if you have multiple listings in here that corresponds
to the slowness. If so your devices are decrypting and then re-encrypting.
Your mention of being asked to reboot leads me to believe that is what is
happening to you.
I have had a few SRs going on this one for a while and it got bumped to
backend but no info in a month or so.
Jim Koerner
Server - ZCM 11.2.2 MU1 and Internal Database on Win2008R2x64
Client - ZCM 11.2.2 MU1 on Win7SP1x64 and WinXPx32
"marklar23" wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
I encrypted my organization's laptops several weeks ago and did not
return them to users until after I could tell by device performance that
the bulk encrypting task had completed. I have two users that are
experiencing extremely slow performance on their systems. When the
users are typing anything like a Word document, upon each keystroke they
see the Windows 7 "circle" icon at the mouse cursor. This seems to come
and go several times over the week, and every few days we are getting a
request to resolve the issue but after restarting the behavior may not
act up anymore.
I found a TID suggesting to change
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Novell-FDE\Parameters\ThrottleEncryption to a lower level
like Idle or BelowNormal. Is there anything else that I should also
try? Thanks!
marklar23
marklar23's Profile: http://forums.novell.com/member.php?userid=5123
View this thread: http://forums.novell.com/showthread.php?t=464262

Slow Performance when program was once 100% proficient

I am working on a 2011 Macbook Pro - OS X version 10.9.5
For over a year I have been working in Adobe Premiere Elements 11 on this computer with no issues. Recently the program began running EXTREMELY slow - for example., taking well over an hour to render video that previously would render in only a minute or two. Went to Apple - thinking it was my MAC - diagnostics on the MAC show the computer itself is fine.
Purchased Premiere Elements 13 (liked the new features and offerings) and was naively hoping it would fix my slow performance issue.
But program is still running horribly slow.
Any suggestions or similar issues?

laurabodey
Premiere Elements 11 or 13 on Mac Computer.
Which program do you want to troubleshoot first?
Let us assume Premiere Elements 11....
1. Edit Menu/Preferences/Scratch Disk
Where are the Scratch Disk pointing and how much free space is at that location
Please assure a clean up of any pile ups of any preview files (Adobe Premiere Elements Previews File Folder), conformed audio files (Media Cache Files Folder), and conformed audio (best cleaned out through Edit Menu/Preferences/Media and the Media Cache Database area Clean button.
2. Download, install, and run the free ccleaner.
https://www.piriform.com/ccleaner/download?mac
3. How much installed RAM does you computer have? Are your source media stored on external hard drive (with the appropriate formatting for Mac)?
4. Does the information in online articles such as the following make any impact on your situation?
Seven ways to free up drive space | Macworld
Let us start here and then decide what next.
I am strictly and Elements Windows user who tries to find common ground between Premiere Elements Windows and Mac to address some of these issue. So, I am
not all that great on Mac locations. Please help me translate from Windows to Mac if necessary.
We will be watching for your results.
ATR

Slow performance on characteristic dimension filter

Hi folks, I'm hoping you can help me troubleshoot something. We have a report in a cube that's been in production and stable for a while (a year or more). We're getting some complaints about slow performance, and I'm noticing that it takes 15 to 20 minutes for the selection screen to refresh with possible values for one of the characteristics of the Material dimension. The characteristic only has 3 possible values for my selection. I would expect it to take more like 1 or 2 minutes. What should I look at to find the cause? We're running BEx with version 3.0B of Business Warehouse.

Carolyn,
In the properties for the characteristic - set it to read data from the dimension table - this can be done from the BeX tab for the infoobject or from WAD if you are using a web template or from the properties in the characteristic in BeX..
Arun
Message was edited by:
Arun Varadarajan

Slow performance prevents correction

I'm using OBI 11g. Is there any way to go directly to the criteria tab or view editor or turn off display of the Compound View?
Slow performance in displays is keeping me from looking at my code to correct performance.
Also, the view editor seems to be unstable, and I cannot even tell if the current problem is with the last code I saved or some previous or "corrupted" version.

You, also, have waaaay too many user startup/Login items.
You need to pare these down to the apps you really need to have launched at startup and running in the background.
Add or remove automatic items
Choose Apple menu > System Preferences, then click Users & Groups.
Select your user account, then click Login Items.
Do one of the following:
Click Add below the list on the right, select an app, document, folder, or disk, then click Add.If you don’t want an item’s windows to be visible after login, select Hide. (Hide does not apply to servers, which always appear in the Finder after login.)
Select the name of the item you want to prevent from opening automatically, then click Delete below the list on the right.
You need to make sure to update all of your third party software if there are OS X Mavericks updates that can be applied.
You may need to go the third party developers' websites if there are no updates through the Mac App Store.
Make sure all of your Web browser Internet plugins, extensions and add-ons are updated to recent versions, also.

Slow Performance CS 55, Indesign, Acrobat

Hello,
ever since upgrading from CS 50 to CS55 the whole suite is incredibly slow, especially Acrobat and Indesign. Phonesupport is unable to figure it out and points out that increased quality in display reduces overall performance "a little". CS 5.0 had no such problems and the computer is not a small one as well: Mac Pro 12 Core, 32 GB Ram, 512 GB SSD Primary, ATI Radeon HD 5870 1024 MB with 3x Cinema 30".
I know tripple head configs are tricky but that can not be the problem in this case, or?
*ANY* help appreciated!
Marc

John,
i think both applications share a big part: the displaying engine. i have set up a basic test: opening 5 PDFs (select all in finden, cmd+Enter > Acrobat opens 5 PDFs sequentially) and pressing CMD+Q some seconds after (This will shut down acrobat, closing all opened PDFs right after opening has completed). On my machine this takes 33 seconds with this pdf: http://www.baumarkt-ahrensburg.de/fileadmin/pdf/tipps/Bade-_und_Duschwanne_einbauen.pdf; which is about 29 seconds too long for my taste.
I have not installed any third party software in Acrobat, but was unable to test it with CS50, because a downgrade is not possible without fully de-/installing the whole suite.
I have tested repairing permissions, adding a new admin user, macCleaner, Safe-Reboot (yields even slower performance) with no success.
Opening this PDF and 4 copies (5 in total) with Acrobat Reader X within Parallels on the same machine results in total open/close time of 8sec. Which would be acceptable as well; but only on my mac not within emulation
Additionally i do not have any antivirussoftware nor other background software running...
Any further ideas?
Marc

Bug report: Energy Manager causes slow performance...

Very slow Windows Startup..
Energy Manager's plans and the problem occured using any plan as I remember, and it wasn't an issue with the maximum processor state. I had heavy disk usage, especially access to the Page File, which is what the person in the second link I posted also described. CPU usage was low. The disk usage was seemingly not related to Energy Manager (Chrome was usually the worst), but removing Energy Manager completely resolved the problem. If you would find it helpful. I'm quite confident that even with Maximum Processor state at %100, CPU usage was low when it was slow, and that disk access was the culprit.
previously have use 1.0.0.31 or 32 not sure.
Windows 8.1
Im using Lenovo Energy Management Driver
1.0.0.28
4.6.2014

I actually have the same problem. Sorry to work on a old thread, but...
I've got my Lenovo B50-70 less than 1 month ago, and had switched it to SSD and had set everything up and is working perfectly. However there are a bunch of lenovo programs that came pre-installed. This computer is used mainly for work and I really don't like programs that suddenly pop-up and ask you to do stuff, as it is quite distracting, and with Lenovo Energy Manager being one of them so I removed it. (I did do some research before I remove...)
Everything was fine, until when I try to switch on my wifi (I usually have it off, as I use LAN most of the time)... For the B50-70 there is a airplane button on F7, which allow the user to switch wifi and bluetooth on/off. That button was unresponsive... After some digging it is actually related to the power energy manager being removed. So I've downloaded the latest version from Lenovo and it was working again...
However though, whenever I start my computer it is taking so long to start... And I tried uninstalling the power energy manager and it solved the problem... And I am stuck with either having no wifi on/off ability or a really slow boot, which loses the whole purpose of the SSD. After you enter your username and password it originally takes around 5~10 seconds to login, now it takes over 1 minute.
I have found this other link, which says Lenovo Power Manager having the same problem.
https://forums.lenovo.com/t5/ThinkVantage-Technologies/Bug-report-Power-Manager-causes-slow-performa...
There is a solution, which you can change the registry to switch a function off. I've tried it and it didn't work, which is not surprising as it's a different program.. But I am hoping that Lenovo can provide a similar solution for Lenovo Energy Manager...

Slow performance in some areas

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for