Slow respone on xenon server

we have an application on oracle 8i database with devloper/2000 as client
we migrated our database on xenon server with 2 gb RAM from pentium iii server.
everything as running fine except one query has incresed the respone time which was fine earlier on prevous server.
what causing the problem could any body help please/
thanks in anticipation.

There is too less data known to give an advise.
- Which operating system do you use?
- What version of Oracle do you use?
- How´s your SGA/PGA configured on those machines?
and many more questions... please be more specific...
Markus

Similar Messages

Why index creation is slower on the new server?

Hi there,
Here is a bit of background/env info:
Existing prod server (physical): Oracle 10gR2 10.2.0.5.8 on ASM
RAM: 96GB
CPUs: 8
RHEL 5.8 64bit
Database size around 2TB
New server:
VMWare VM with Oracle 10gR2 10.2.0.5.8 on ASM
RAM 128GB
vCPUs: 16
RHEL 5.8 64bit
Copy of prod DB (from above server) - all init param are the same
I noticed that Index creation is slower on this server. I ran following query:
SELECT name c1, cnt c2, DECODE (total, 0, 0, ROUND (cnt * 100 / total)) c3
FROM (SELECT name, VALUE cnt, (SUM (VALUE) OVER ()) total
FROM v$sysstat
WHERE name LIKE 'workarea exec%')
C1
C2
C3
workarea executions - optimal
100427285
100
workarea executions - onepass
2427
0
workarea executions - multipass
0
0
Following bitmap index takes around 40mins in prod server while it takes around 2Hrs on the VM.
CREATE BITMAP INDEX MY_IDX ON
MY_HIST(PROD_YN) TABLESPACE TS_IDX PCTFREE 10
STORAGE(INITIAL 12582912 NEXT 12582912 PCTINCREASE 0 ) NOLOGGING
This index is created during a batch-process and the dev team is complaining of slowness of the batch on new server. I have found this one statement responsible for some of the grief. There may be more and I am investigating.
I know that adding "parallel" option may speedup but I want find out why is it slow on the new server.
I tried creating a simple index on a large table and it took 2min in prod and 3.5min on this VM. So I guess index creation is slower on this VM in general. DMLs (select/insert/delete/update) seem to work with better elapsed time.
Any clues what might be causing this slowness in index creation?
Best regards

I have been told that the SAN in use by the VM has capacity of 10K IOPS. Not sure of this info helps. I don't know more than this about the storage.
What else do I need to find out? Please let me know - I'll check with my Sys Admin and update the thread.
Best regards

Slow respon when update Document Numbering

Hi Expert,
We have 7 branch and 4 different type of sales document. and we change our document numbering every month.
We have use SAP Business One for a year. So, we have large number of document numbering.
when we update and add new row in document numbering, we get slow respon. It can about 30 minutes every update.
how can we make it faster?
*we use 8.82 PL:08 version.
Regards,
Triadi Bagus

Hi Triadi,
Try to update Document Numbering when no user are logged on data or Ask your users to not to post any transaction during the period when you are updating Document Numbering.
This problem arise because when user are punching transactions on database as Internal Document No Changes every time a transaction is punched on Database.
This May be the reason.
Hope this help!!
Regards,
Sudhir

My Adobe Muse website wont publish, it's running slow and showing a server error

I've had a website in adobe muse that I've published many times before with no errors. After publishing, It tries to upload the site and loads it very slow and stops at about 69% and says the server is not connected, even though I have internet, checked the firewall and updated the cache in explorer. I was able to upload another website that I have on Muse, it loaded slowly also, stopped at 97%, I resumed it and it loaded. What to do next?

The site is hosted through business catalyst: northstarconservancy.org. I've had no issues with this website in three years and have been able to edit and publish with no problems. It shows a server error and says to check my network connection. I noticed that adobe was working on their server the night before I had this issue, so I will probably have to call the tech support and see whats up with it, since it seems related. Thanks, Amanda

Slow browsing on windows server

I upgraded 4 stations that were running under Tiger to Lion and now the browsing of my Windows server via the Finder is awfully slow. I've a read a number of so-called fixex whcih none seems to work for everyone.

Is the problem only with files from the server?
Do downloads from the internet go any faster?
Allan

It's very slow to access file server after installed SP1 of Win7.

I found it's become very slow to access shared files on file server after installed win7 SP1, (windows6.1-KB976932-X86.exe), access same file, the win7 without sp1 is fast in 5 secs, but the pc with sp1 need more than 30 secs. And
I tried to removed the sp1, everything goes fine, access fast as others.
I don't understand what's the reason and which feature affected it, I believe the sp1 can help Win7 be more safety, but why the performance on it get worse.
And I didn't find the same question or tips on forum or website, do you really haven't the issue?
Arnold From Shanghai, China
Arnold Yu

Hi Arnold,
Windows 7 Service pack and any other Windows Updates are released to improve the performance, reliability and security of the system.
Firstly please run the performance troubleshooter:
Open the Performance troubleshooter
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows7/Open-the-Performance-troubleshooter
If it doesn't resolve the issue, Put the computer in
Clean Boot and then check to see if the issue persists.
If it still persists, please use performance monitor to trace your computer's performance:
Performance Monitoring Getting Started Guide
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd744567(v=ws.10).aspx
Karen Hu
TechNet Community Support

Slow Files Copy File Server DFS Namespace

I have two file servers running on VM both servers are on different physical servers.
Both connect with dfs namespace.
The problem part is both servers never have same copy speed.
Sometime very slow files copy about 1MBps on FS01 and fast copy 12MBps on FS02.
Sometime fast on FS01 and slow on FS02.
Sometime both of them slow..
So as usual I reboot the servers. Doesn't work.
Then I reboot the DC01 also doesn't work. There is another brother DC02.
After I reboot DC02, one of the FS become normal and another FS still slow.
FS01 and FS02 randomly. They never get faster speed together.
Users never complain slow FS because 1MBps is acceptable for them to open word excel etc.,.
The HUGE problem is I don't have backup when the slow FS days.
The problem since two weeks I'm giving up fixing it myself and need help from you expert guys.
Thanks!
DC01, DC02, FS01, FS02 (Win 2012 and All VMs)

Hi,
Since the slow copy is also occurred when you tried the direct copy from both shared folder, you could enable the disk write cache on the destination server to check the results.
HOW TO: Manually Enable/Disable Disk Write Caching
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/259716
Windows 2008 R2 - large file copy uses all available memory and then tranfer rate decreases dramatically (20x)
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/3f8a80fd-914b-4fe7-8c93-b06787b03662/windows-2008-r2-large-file-copy-uses-all-available-memory-and-then-tranfer-rate-decreases?forum=winservergen
You could also refer to the FAQ article to troubleshoot the slow copy issue:
[Forum FAQ] Troubleshooting Network File Copy Slowness
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/7bd9978c-69b4-42bf-90cd-fc7541ccb663/forum-faq-troubleshooting-network-file-copy-slowness?forum=winserverPN
Best Regards,
Mandy
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

Slow RD connection to server via RD Gatway if NLA is disabled on the server

If I disable NLA on a server (tried on 2 different servers), the rd connection (via gateway only) is much slower (over 1 min to get to the logon screen).
RD Gateways are 2012R2, hosts are 2012 and 2012 R2.
Re-enabling NLA fixes the issue. Any ideas?
Dario Palermo

Hi Dario,
Putting the gatewayusagemethod:i:1 in the .rdp file will force the RD Client to use the gateway always and thus speed up the connection time. When connecting from the Internet, as a test, please uncheck Bypass RD Gateway server for local addresses in the RD
Client options--Advanced tab--RD Gateway settings.
Please try “Require user authentication for remote connections by using Network Level Authentication” policy setting under below path.
Computer Configuration\Policies\Administrative Templates\Windows Components\Remote Desktop Services\Remote Desktop Session Host\Security
Configure Network Level Authentication for Remote Desktop Services Connections
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc732713.aspx
Addition you can check for “Network security: LAN Manager authentication level”
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc738867(v=ws.10).aspx
Hope it helps!
Thanks.
Dharmesh Solanki
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

Excel 2010 slow to save on Server 2008 R2 server

I, like many other users am having slowness when saving and opening excel and word docs. I have a W7 x64 machine and the server is a 2008 R2 x64 machine. I've tried to apply the hotfix:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/981711 but
when I try to install it, it says "The update is not applicable to your computer".
Any ideas on what to do? I made sure it was downloading the x64 version of the patch as well.
Thanks in advance.
Jimmy

Hi George,
When I do a search for the two files below, I come up empty handed on my Server 2008 R2 SP1 box.
===========
File name
File version
File size
Date
Time
Platform
Rdbss.sys
6.1.7600.20713
   719,872
      13-May-2010
20:01
x-64
Mrxsmb20.sys
6.1.7600.20713
   305,152
      13-May-2010
20:01
x-64
===========
I attempted to disable the SMB 2.0 on my workstation only and it seems to save files like normal now. I didn't get the saving or downloading message in the splash page. I don't think disabling SMB 2.0 is a solution is it? What do I do now?

Slow query on remote server

Hi
I am running a query as below;
INSERT INTO tblEvents( <fields list> )
SELECT <fields list>
FROM OPENROWSET('SQLNCLI', 'Server=<ip address>;DATABASE=MyDB;Uid=sa;Pwd=MyPassword;', 'SELECT * FROM tblEvents') AS a
WHERE (ID = 68596)
Problem is that below part of query runs very slow (takes around 3 mins to complete) even though it just needs to bring one row.
SELECT <fields list>
FROM OPENROWSET('SQLNCLI', 'Server=<ip address>;DATABASE=MyDB;Uid=sa;Pwd=MyPassword;', 'SELECT * FROM tblEvents') AS a
WHERE (ID = 68596)
What is the problem and how can I speed it up?
Thanks
Regards

Hi,
as Ronen already mentioned, the syntax you are using will not push anything from the confition down the provider stack to the data source, it will pull the whole data and the filter it on the client side. (where you execute the query).
You can either use the syntax that Ronen already pointed out OR use a linked Server along with the existing provider for SQL Server. In most cases the provider is able to push down the conditions to the data source, have it executes here and then bring back
only the relevant rows. This depends on the query you are using and the ability of the driver to translate the conditions.
See more on creating linked servers here:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa560998.aspx
-Jens
Jens K. Suessmeyer
http://blogs.msdn.com/Jenss

Query very slow on Windows 2003 Server

Hi,
Our customer is running 10g on Windows 2003 server. Some queries perform badly. I imported the data into a 10g DB on Linux (at our office) to analyze and test. Strange enough the same query takes more than 10 times longer to run on the Windows machine compared to the Linux. The Windows machine is dedicated to Oracle, it is not 'overloaded'.
SELECT
plan_task.id_task,
plan_task.task_id,
plan_task.taskdef_y_n,
plan_task.description,
plan_task.status,
plan_task.team_id,
plan_task.activity_id,
plan_task.task_start_datetime,
plan_task.district_id,
plan_task.task_end_datetime,
plan_task.taskdef_freq_code,
plan_task.taskdef_start_time,
plan_task.taskdef_end_time,
plan_task.order_nr
d,
PREVENT.PLAN_PERSONS_AVAILABLE_SHORT(ID_TASK) PERS_OK,
PREVENT.PLAN_MATERIALS_AVAILABLE_SHORT(ID_TASK) MAT_OK
FROM PREVENT.PLAN_TASK
WHERE (TASKDEF_Y_N='N') AND (TASK_START_DATETIME>=to_date(to_char(SYSDATE,'dd-mm-yyyy'),'dd-mm-yyyy'))
AND (TASK_START_DATETIME<to_date(to_char(SYSDATE,'dd-mm-yyyy'),'dd-mm-yyyy')+1)
ORDER BY DESCRIPTION;
On LINUX (Intel 2 GHz, 2 Gb mem) takes 0,5 seconds to execute (46 rows returned)
================================================================================
Plan
SELECT STATEMENT ALL_ROWSCost: 27 Bytes: 2,436 Cardinality: 29
     4 SORT ORDER BY Cost: 27 Bytes: 2,436 Cardinality: 29
          3 FILTER
               2 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE PREVENT.PLAN_TASK Cost: 26 Bytes: 2,436 Cardinality: 29
                    1 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX PREVENT.PLAN_TASK_START_DATETIME_I Cost: 2 Cardinality: 30
On WINDOWS (Intel 2 GHz, 2 Gb mem) takes 11 seconds to execute (46 rows returned)
=================================================================================
Plan
SELECT STATEMENT ALL_ROWSCost: 35 Bytes: 3,276 Cardinality: 39
     4 SORT ORDER BY Cost: 35 Bytes: 3,276 Cardinality: 39
          3 FILTER
               2 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE PREVENT.PLAN_TASK Cost: 34 Bytes: 3,276 Cardinality: 39
                    1 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX PREVENT.PLAN_TASK_START_DATETIME_I Cost: 2 Cardinality: 40
NOTEs:
- The data is exactly the same on both machines
- I analyzed_schema on both machines/DB's before running the query
- The SGA size en DB_BUFFERS are (almost) set to the same value
- Oracle version is the same: 10g

On Windows:
- I exported the data
- Re-created my 2 tablespaces, to set: extent management local, uniform 1M
- imported the data
- dbms_stats.gather_schema_stats( option=>'GATHER')
Plan
SELECT STATEMENT ALL_ROWSCost: 36 Bytes: 3,32 Cardinality: 40
     4 SORT ORDER BY Cost: 36 Bytes: 3,32 Cardinality: 40
          3 FILTER
               2 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE PREVENT.PLAN_TASK Cost: 35 Bytes: 3,32 Cardinality: 40
                    1 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX PREVENT.PLAN_TASK_START_DATETIME_I Cost: 2 Cardinality: 41
Tested, takes 7 seconds now (was 11), but this is still slow compared to the run on Linux
Grt, Stephan
Edited by: Stephan van Hoof on Jan 9, 2009 8:41 PM

Swing app in JDK6 continues to rendering slow in Windows Terminal Server

Hi,
Because Swing apps create interfaces internally and not using default OS APIs,
when running into a Windows Terminal Server client, there is no way to optimize
rendering. Windows Terminal Server and Linux FreeNX use a mechanism to send
to client only commands to render the windows. But, because the way Swing works,
not totally integrated to OS APIs, it's not possible for terminal servers to do this,
and these servers render Swing like images, something like VNC do, very slower than.
I have tested native apps and AWT apps, and the difference is very significant,
something like 50-70% faster.
Is there some project in Swing APIs or java.net open-sources to better this?

We are also seeing this issue with a Compiere implementation. With 10 distributed sites across the US, our client wanted to use Windows Terminal Services to simplify the client desktop management of the Swing application.
But performance is terrible...and screen painting issues a real problem. We are also on JDK5 still, so I'm discouraged to see that JDK6 doesn't appear to offer much improvement?
Is there any project afoot to address this issue for installations using terminal services?
Thanks,
Peter

Slow connection in one server if accessing through Cisco ACE

Hi,
Good day, Can someone help me on my problem? I have 3 servers, server1, server2 and server3. When one pc accessing the server 3 application via Cisco ACE, it experienced a slow connection but when direct access without Cisco Ace, it's fast. The connection of this PC through cisco ace and direct access have no issue.
What need to do in my configuration? Below is my configuration
logging enable
logging timestamp
logging trap 7
logging buffered 7
logging monitor 7
logging host 167.81.126.5 udp/514
logging host 137.55.152.147 udp/514
resource-class SG_01
limit-resource all minimum 0.00 maximum unlimited
limit-resource sticky minimum 10.00 maximum equal-to-min
boot system image:c4710ace-mz.A3_2_0.bin
login timeout 30
peer hostname singapore-ace2
hostname singapore-ace1
interface gigabitEthernet 1/1
channel-group 14
no shutdown
interface gigabitEthernet 1/2
channel-group 14
no shutdown
interface gigabitEthernet 1/3
channel-group 14
no shutdown
interface gigabitEthernet 1/4
channel-group 14
no shutdown
interface port-channel 14
description ISOLAN-ACE-TRUNK
ft-port vlan 99
switchport trunk native vlan 1
switchport trunk allowed vlan 12,14,112
no shutdown
clock timezone SGT 8 0
ntp server 137.55.152.1
context Admin
member SG_01
access-list ALL line 8 extended permit ip any any
access-list ALL line 9 extended permit icmp any any
ip domain-name ysn.psg.philips.com
probe http singapore_01
description This probe used to monitor application url-app-script
interval 5
passdetect interval 5
request method get url /insiteserverstatus/insiteserverstatus.aspx
expect status 200 200
open 1
probe http singapore_02
description This probe used to monitor IIS-login-page
interval 5
passdetect interval 5
request method get url /InSiteLumiledsApplication/
expect status 200 200
open 1
probe icmp uplink
description This probe used in conjunction with ft track host
interval 2
faildetect 2
passdetect interval 3
parameter-map type connection PARAM_L4STICKY-IP
exceed-mss allow
rserver host sggysnysn1ms013
ip address 137.55.152.135
inservice
rserver host sggysnysn1ms014
ip address 137.55.152.136
inservice
rserver host sggysnysn1ms018
ip address 137.55.152.145
inservice
serverfarm host PLI9058
probe singapore_01
probe singapore_02
rserver sggysnysn1ms013
    inservice
rserver sggysnysn1ms014
    inservice
rserver sggysnysn1ms018
    inservice
sticky ip-netmask 255.255.255.255 address both SG_GROUP_01
timeout 720
replicate sticky
serverfarm PLI9058
class-map type management match-any HTTPS-ALLOW_CLASS
class-map match-all L4STICKY-IP_141:ANY_CLASS
2 match virtual-address 137.55.152.141 any
class-map type http loadbalance match-any NO_MS018
50 match source-address 137.55.155.31 255.255.254.0
class-map type management match-any SSH-ALLOW_CLASS
2 match protocol ssh source-address 167.81.124.0 255.255.255.192
3 match protocol ssh source-address 167.81.126.0 255.255.255.192
class-map type management match-any remote_access
2 match protocol xml-https any
3 match protocol icmp any
5 match protocol ssh any
6 match protocol http any
7 match protocol https any
8 match protocol snmp any
policy-map type management first-match remote_mgmt_allow_policy
class remote_access
    permit
policy-map type loadbalance first-match L7PLBSF_STICKY-NETMASK_POLICY
class class-default
    sticky-serverfarm SG_GROUP_01
    insert-http X-Forwarded-For header-value "%is"
policy-map multi-match PLI9058-VIPs_POLICY
class L4STICKY-IP_141:ANY_CLASS
    loadbalance vip inservice
    loadbalance policy L7PLBSF_STICKY-NETMASK_POLICY
    loadbalance vip icmp-reply
    connection advanced-options PARAM_L4STICKY-IP
interface vlan 12
description Client-side vlan
bridge-group 1
no normalization
mac-sticky enable
access-group input ALL
access-group output ALL
service-policy input PLI9058-VIPs_POLICY
no shutdown
interface vlan 14
ip address 137.55.152.236 255.255.255.248
peer ip address 137.55.152.237 255.255.255.248
service-policy input remote_mgmt_allow_policy
no shutdown
interface vlan 112
description Server-side vlan
bridge-group 1
no normalization
access-group input ALL
access-group output ALL
nat-pool 1 137.55.152.141 137.55.152.141 netmask 255.255.255.192 pat
no shutdown
interface bvi 1
ip address 137.55.152.189 255.255.255.192
alias 137.55.152.188 255.255.255.192
peer ip address 137.55.152.190 255.255.255.192
description Bridge-Group 1 Virtual Interface
no shutdown
ft interface vlan 99
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.252
peer ip address 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.252
no shutdown
ft peer 1
heartbeat interval 100
heartbeat count 10
ft-interface vlan 99
ft group 1
peer 1
priority 150
peer priority 50
associate-context Admin
inservice
ft track host test1
track-host 137.55.152.234
peer track-host 137.55.152.235
peer probe uplink priority 50
probe uplink priority 50
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 137.55.152.233

Hi Earsdale,
All the three servers are using the same configuration, so, I'm afraid it's not possible to give you a simple answer. You will need more troubleshooting.
I would recommend you to start by checking the differences between the servers because one of those differences is certainly causing the failure.
Also, it would be helpful to get traffic captures on the TenGig interface of the ACE to compare the behavior of the connection when going to the different servers, as well as the differences when being load-balanced vs accessing the server directly.
If you need help with this troubleshooting, you can always open a TAC service request
Regards
Daniel

SSAS Tabular slow (full) processing when server is up for more than a day

Setup: SQL 2014 CU3. Machine with 2 physical CPUs and 384GB of RAM. Windows 2012R2.
96GB allocated to SQL Server, rest allocated to Vertipaq/Tabular.
Problem: after a restart of Analysis Services (Tabular), processing time for full processing is fine. Processing of the main table runs with 145000 rows/sec for one cube, and 60000 rows/sec for the other.
After a day of uptime, full processing is slower by a factor of 2-3. For the second cube, performance stays at a low ~ 18000 rows/sec for subsequent full processing.
Performance counter says "memory Limit Vertipaq KB" ~ 280GB, "while memory usage KB" ~ 63GB. There should be plenty of free memory.
SQL Queries for the tabular data are fine and extremely simple and high performance.
I can reproduce the effect at will.
Is this a known bug?

Please try to clear the cache and check if this issue is persists or not.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-IN/library/hh230974.aspx
Besides, here are some links about tabular memory setting, please refer to the links below.
http://www.sqlbi.com/articles/memory-settings-in-tabular-instances-of-analysis-services/
http://www.sqlbi.com/articles/memory-settings-in-tabular-instances-of-analysis-services/

Slow ethernet save to server

Hello. I have recently started to experience major slow downs on my G5 when saving to the server. The problem is really noticable when saving from a program (Photoshop, Illustrator etc) to the server - it takes 30-40 secs whereas before it would be almost instant. I've tried the exact same file on a G5 dual on the same network and server and its fine.
I've done the obvious - changed cables, rebooted, rebooted server, disconnected iDisk, switched ports. When I connect directly to a PowerBook with an ethernet cable it works fine.
Can't think of anything else - any ideas!?
G5 Quad Mac OS X (10.4.6)

I'm experiencing the same issue. My situation is a PC connected to a Powerbook G4 with a single ethernet cable (100Mbit). Recently (I suspect since an OS X upgrade), the transfer rates from the powerbook to the PC have gotten very slow. If I use MenuMeters to monitor the transfer speed, I can see the speed spiking erratically, jumping up to hundreds of kilobytes and dropping back to a couple kilobytes per second, each second. When I download files to the powerbook, the speed is rock solid multiple megabytes per second.
I've tried changing the network cable, tried tweaking the network settings on the PC to no avail. The only thing that helped slightly was to change the powerbook's ethernet settings to 100Mbit half-duplex (I read on a different thread that slow upstream/fast downstream is a 'typical duplex misconfiguration issue'). Now, the transfer speed is still quite erratic, but the average speed is much higher (back in the megabyte-per-second range). But if I set it to autoconfigure, or force it to full-duplex, the speed is much slower. This is still not a real solution though.
This problem occurs regardless of protocol (I've tried SMB and FTP). Given that this has suddenly started appearing, I suspect a faulty OS upgrade. I'm certainly happy to hear that I'm not the only one with this problem.

Slow respone on xenon server

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for