Slow speeds, am i missing something ?

hi all,
been having issues for a couple of months or so now, where my IP profile is down at 135. I've tried removing the phone which sometimes seemed to cause problems (but didint for several months), and after 3 days i was up to about 2500 ip profile and downstream speed, but then the hub resynced me back to 150 and IP profile dropped back to 135.
So its been plugged into the main test socket for 4 days now via a filter (and i've now tried 3 filters), and no change in IP profile but the hub has restarted itself several times that i know of.
I can't think of any other tests i can do - ran a line test a few days back which said it was ok. Could the hub be faulty and causing this? Any other ideas ?
Thanks
Stu

Hi guys,thanks and here you go:
ADSL line status
Connection Information
Line state
Connected
Connection time
0 days, 02:06:30
Downstream
160 Kbps
Upstream
448 Kbps
ADSL Settings
VPI/VCI
0/38
Type
PPPoA
Modulation
G.992.1 Annex A
Latency type
Interleaved
Noise margin (Down/Up)
15.8 dB / 7.0 dB
Line attenuation (Down/Up)
32.1 dB / 20.0 dB
Output power (Down/Up)
3.4 dBm / 0.9 dBm
Loss of Framing (Local/Remote)
0 / 0
Loss of Signal (Local/Remote)
0 / 0
Loss of Power (Local/Remote)
0 / 0
FEC Errors (Down/Up)
1 / 3144
CRC Errors (Down/Up)
1 / 135
HEC Errors (Down/Up)
0 / 95
Error Seconds (Local/Remote)
1 / 61
from speedtest
Download speedachieved during the test was - 113 Kbps
For your connection, the acceptable range of speeds is 50-250 Kbps.
Additional Information:
Your DSL Connection Rate :160 Kbps(DOWN-STREAM), 448 Kbps(UP-STREAM)
IP Profile for your line is - 135 Kbps

Similar Messages

PrE8 very slow? Am I missing something?

Hi everyone,
I just recently upgraded from Premiere Elements 4 to 8 on a newly built computer. I have been fairly disappointed so far with PrE8 and wondering if I am missing something / optimizations that would make it work (and work efficiently) on my computer.
My computer: i7 930 oc'd to 4ghz (stable, stressed with prime95, used for a month), 12GB ram, GTX460x2 SLI with latest Nvidia drivers, 250 GB SSD boot/program drive / used for scratch disk, and a 2 TB Raid10.
PrE8 was upgraded to 8.01 already. It starts up just fine. The problem comes when I am trying to encode a simple project to burn to dvd. I am just putting together numerous video clips to burn into a single double layer dvd. File size about 7 GB. Firstly, the encoding seems awfully slow. PrE is the only program running and it is taking (4+) hours. Looking at the task manager, PrE8 doesn't even seem to stress my system when encoding. It is using only 2 cores with max 25% cpu utilization. I have the affinity set to all cores and increased priority for the process to high with no difference. This is no better than when I was using PrE4 to encode on my Duo-Core 2.8ghz, 4gb laptop. I was hoping to save some time with encoding by building the new system but so far very disappointed. Is it because PrE8 is poorly threaded or am I missing something.
Ben

Hi everyone,
Thank you for your answers and suggestions. I'll clarify / rephrase my question. The program itself works. Every device driver has been updated previously. My issue is that PrE8.01 does not seem to use all / most of my system's resources when encoding / exporting a video. I understand that having other programs / antivirus running, fragmented hard-drive (ssd scratch disk and fresh 2 TB Raid 10 drive), different codecs, size, etc. can bog a system down and use up resources but when it only uses 2 physical cpu cores (+2 virtual cores) of a quad core system and only at 25% utilization max of those two physical cores with everything running and I wait 4+ hours to encode a 7 GB collection of 720x480 avi's, I cannot help but wonder how much faster and time saving it would be if it used all 4 physical cores at 100% ulitization.
My question is am I missing something in that it only uses a fraction of my system's resources instead of all that is available? When you are working on your projects, is PrE8.01 using all your system's resources (100% utilization)? I can understand PrE8.01 being slow if my system is old, bottlenecked, and struggling along at 100% resource utilization but that isn't the case. Maybe PrE8 doesn't use more than 2 cpu cores? But one would think it would at least stress those two cores a bit more than just 25%.
Sincerely,
Ben

Am I missing something? USB Ethernet appears to be much slower than wifi.

System = Macbook Air early 2010
OSX = Mavericks
Have been using wifi to backup via time machine to windows 7 SMB network share.
Expected to see much faster backup times when ethernet attached using the Apple USB Ethernet dongle but the backup times seem much slower. Am I missing something here? Anyone else with experience of ethernet versus wifi for intranet/local network data transfers?
Thanks,
Bennie

Csound1 - My tests have indicated you are correct. Had not done the match before acquring the dongle. Seems like a waste of money unless you don't have access to wifi.
Thanks

Can osmf player play audio at slow speed

I'm trying to load an audio file and play it at a slow speed. Is this something an osmf player can do?

Hi,
This is not supported in OSMF. Sorry
-Andrian

TS1398 what is the trick with getting connected to airport WiFi? It takes forever to go from the settings portion then to the browser to "accept" terms. Am I missing something to speed the process?

what is the trick with getting connected to airport WiFi? It takes forever to go from the settings portion then to the browser to "accept" terms. Am I missing something to speed the process?

OK, I figured out from the various postings on here and way too many hours overnight how to pretty much make the Yoga do what it is supposed to do. I've written up a step by step at this link that may help some of you with your problems as well
Let me know if this helps!

Slow speeds. Apparently I don't have a bt broadban...

After using bt's own e-form to email them about my long running loss of speed over the year from 2.6mb for the last say 10 years, to 1.6mb (1.4mb at its lowest) download / 0.36 up. ping latency around 0.38 i think, apart from today where its 42.25!! what's that?!
All I've got back so far is:
"Recently you requested personal assistance from our on-line support centre. Below is a summary of your request and our response.
If this issue is not resolved to your satisfaction, you may reopen it within the next 14 days.
Thank you for allowing us to be of service to you. " ....and....
"This is in regards to the e-mail you have send on 20th August 2014. We are sorry to inform you that there is no sufficient information in the e-mail to pull up any active broadband account. We would request you to provide the details of your broadband account so that we can pull up the account and help you further."
Just to be clear, their OWN e-form didn't have enough information for them to find my account??? It asks for my name, address, phone number my broadband is on, email address, my account number (assume its the BT account as that's all I have), plus the problem. What else can I type in if there's no other fields.
So I submitted the form. A couple of days later I got an email back with the above included in it.
1. Why automatically close the call? They hadn't resolved anything, so why close it? The only other thing they mentioned was going onto their Help pages (durr how did i manage to use their e-form in the first place?).
2. No mention of what these missing "details" are. (On purpose?)
So I replied and being a little annoyed at their poor response, which just sounds like "yep dealt with that call within the response time target I got to make".
I've had BT broadband since its inception, even before, but they cannot find my account? Amazing they can bill me each quarter without any problems. So I sent my bt account number again even thought it was included in the e-form. Asked them clearly to tell me what "details" of my broadband account they need from me. More than happy to oblige. Oh, and no I'm not satisfied with their resolution and re-open the call!!
So some more days have now passed and guess what. I get an email with the exact same text!!
I replied. In CAPITAL LETTERS for the hard of hearing. What specific details do you want from me?
I wait in baited breath.
OMG I haven't even got onto the problem of the slow speed issue yet!
I guess they want me to phone (premium 0800 number?), or do something myself. I don't want to phone them as I've experienced the same ol' routine before, life's too short. I've paid the top price for ever, so I would think they could do some of the leg work eh? I mean part of the cost is the support they provide, right? How do you lose a broadband account?
It niggles me is that I pay same price infinity customers do and I'm still stuck in the dial-up speed ages. And don't get me on about those tv ads. Like everyone can get infinity. Yeah I'm still waiting after 5 years that it was coming. Amazing the Isles of Scilly with about 10 people living on there manage to get it quicker than me living in a town in the middle of the UK. I digress...
If I can do a speed test from both their bt.com site and btwholesale speed test and get a poor speed (approx 1.8 max) from exchange to router then I know by the time it gets to my pc its not going to be 2.6 is it.
PS i don't have a master socket/test socket to try. its the old type. And why has the speed just dropped and kept down (like for so many others in this forum), where nothing has changed, at least at the customers end of the line.
I don't expect someone in the forum to come up with the solution, but its more of a rant on my part at the poor response to my request, let alone some kind of investigation into the problem itself.
I work in "IT" and part of it is dealing with calls from customers. If I had dealt with a call like BT had then I'd be getting a ear bashing from my manager.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

if you want help about your conenction speed from the forum members then can you post the adsl stats from your router please.
can you try quiet line test dial 17070 option 2 should be quiet nohiss/crackle and best with corded phone if cordless then dull hum normal
can you enter your phone number and post results remember to delete number https://www.btwholesale.com/includes/adsl/main.html
If you like a post, or want to say thanks for a helpful answer, please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side of the post.
If someone answers your question correctly please let other members know by clicking on ’Mark as Accepted Solution’.

K9N2 Sli Platinum + SSD OCZ Vertex 3 = Slow Speed Problem [PARTIALLY SOLVED]

Hey folks,
I have a problem with my new SSD. I only get sequential reads of 140MB/s and writes of 114MB/s.
I think it is a driver related issue. I once got faster SATA2-like speeds but cannot reproduce the system settings again... Everything back to SATA1-like speeds after reboot.
First my pc specs:
MSI K9N2 Sli Platinum, BIOS v3.9
- 6 SATAII ports by nForce 750a SLI
- 2 ESATA (External-SATA) ports (back panel) by JMB363
- Supports storage and data transfers at up to 3 Gb/s
AMD Phenom II 965 Black
Patriot PV224G8500ELKB Viper II Series DDR2 4GB (2 x 2GB, CL5 PC-8500/1066MHz)
SSD SATAIII OCZ Vertex 3, 120GB, FW v2.11
LG Internal BlueRay BH10LS30
Windows 7 Ultimate x64
I only get very slow speeds with the SSD. I tried so many things that I am getting very frustrated now, I am even thinking about getting a new board and ram just to get the SSD up to speed...
1)
I installed Win7 first with all the default settings in Windows Setup from DVD. Default "IDE ATA/ATAPI controllers" driver was "Standard AHCI1.0 Serial ATA Controller".
SSD was connected to SATA1-port, On-Chip Sata Controller AHCI enabled in BIOS, Extra RAID/IDE Controller disabled.
All fine, but whichever benchmark I used (AS SSD, HD Tune Pro, Atto Disk Benchmark, CrystalDiskMark; other tools used: DriveControllerInfo, AIDA64/Everest, CrystalDiskInfo ) I got e.g. 140MB/s Read and 114MB/s Write sequentially (CrystalDiskmark, similar with random data AND only zeros ).
Trim working (it seems) with AHCI driver. I also changed to nvstor64 driver (nforce driver setup 15.56), with is marginally faster but not what you would expect from a SATAIII drive on SATAII controller.
2)
I installed Win7 using "diskpart" (Shift-F10) during disk setup, setting a cluster size of 64k instead of default. No real change.
3)
After reinstall of Win7 x64 (again...), I changed from SATA1 port to SATA6 port, also enabled Extra Raid/IDE controller set to AHCI as well.
Nothing changed. With all settings to default in Windows (ahci default driver), I then manually updated the ahci to nvstore64 driver in Device Management, rebooted.
Then a minute later after reboot I got the following Sequential speeds with CrystalDiskMark:
273MB/s read and 137MB/s write (random data) + 274MB/s read and 220MB/s write (with zeros) !!!
While I ran this benchmark Windows came up with a message: "You must restart your computer to apply these changes - Restart Now/Restart Later".
After the previos reboot, when I changed manually from AHCI to NVSTORE, I had changed nothing in the current session, apart from running CrystalDiskMark.
I did reboot and I was back to the slow SSD speeds again = 140/114 MB/s...
4)
I have tried every possible combination of mainboard SATA ports, drivers changing with nvidia setup/manually, deleting and disabling controllers (incl BSOD and startup repair :D ), chaning bios settings around, but I just cannot get back the faster speeds
There is never any change in speed, whether I use ahci or nvstore64, whichever benchmark I use, whether random or zeros...
5)
Could the SSD be broken, something internally preventing it from faster speeds (with this one random exception)?
Could it be that my K9N2 SataPorts only allows for / reduced to SATA1 speeds?
Am I missing something with the driver setup?
Do I need additional drivers for the extra JMicron Controller when using SataPorts 5/6 ?
I have no other mainboard to test this with...
Please guys, I am going to jump out of the window if I can't fix it... :(
Thanks, Mike

Hey guys - problem 'solved':
I tested the OCZ SSD Vertex 3 120GB with following sata3 controller card http://www.lycom.com.tw/PE-115H.htm.
The card itself works immediately (needs at least PCIe x4 slot, will work slower otherwise but still faster than the OCZ SSD @sata1 with nvidia chipset).
There is some raid setup, doesn't apply to me, the boot even with the card is really only a few seconds longer and not annoying at all. Windows (7 x64) needed a driver, supplied on CD (which is cheap and making noise like h**l). The card works w/o the driver but doesn't harm to install it...
Also, just to clarify, this sata controller card did not need any specific setup at all. Just put it in, plug in sata cable (I use akasa sata3-rated), maybe change boot device in BIOS (I didn't even have to), done - booting Windows as usual.
Benchmark CDM with sata controller card Lycom PE-115H:
http://img24.imageshack.us/img24/3845/cdmpe115hahci0x00.png
http://img850.imageshack.us/img850/7549/cdmpe115hahcirand.png
Speed is much better than before with nvidia chipset 750a SLI controller: sata1 (sata2 whenever it randomly worked):
http://img839.imageshack.us/img839/505/cdmahci0x0.png
http://img13.imageshack.us/img13/6258/cdmahci0x0sata6contnv64.png
Final thoughts:
Well, I am happy with the SSD speed now (PCIe limited to 5Gbps). However, I had to spent quite some time to get it working on my sata2-cabable mainboard. Finally, I had to buy a extra controller card to get it working reliably at speeds faster than sata1. There is hardly any useful information on why this problem occurs with (older) nvidia chipsets and OCZ (sata3) SSDs. I still think that OCZ must know about this problem, but regards this issue as low priority, while at the same time not planning on giving up on sales to people with nvidia chipsets. Maybe OCZ should just make a big sticker on the box the drives come in with something like "Does/Might not work with nvidia chipsets, please use third-party sata controller card or different SSD manufacturer". But then none of these potential customers would buy OCZ SSDs...
I will keep the sata3 controller, anyway handy to have, but return the OCZ Vertex 3 120GB and replace it with a SSD from a different manufacturer (Corsair Force GT, Patriot and OWC are not that great to get around here). The benchmarks for most people will not achieve the maximum advertised OCZ speeds anyway, so why not go with a brand that allows for some plug'n'play with some customer support.
Hope this post helps others like me with their nvidia chipset + sata1 speed problem
Cheers, Mike

Slower and slower speeds on broadband.

For the past 4 weeks I've had what I thought was incredibly slow BB speed, 600Kbps at best through a HH2. After several calls to BT India (the usual try the master socket, reset the modem, we'll clear the line, we'll try our end etc, etc) I got an engineer on 22/08/11.
He tested the line at the socket (we have only one) and he was registering 8Mbps (amazing! I only seem to get 4-6Mbps which I thought was good). He thought it may be the modem and replaced the old one with a BT HH3. He then did a speed test at the computer using BT's speed checker and it showed 1.6Mbps. He said this should settle and improve in 48hrs time.
That evening things had improved, although not to pre problem speeds. The next day, horror of horrors my speed was down to 83Kbps (yes eighty three) and it has been like this since (using BT's speed checker).
Just got off the phone to BT India and they have said that they will sort it out from their end (they say they can see the problem I'm having) and will call back Monday to see if things have improved.
I thought perhaps it is my set up as I hav emy computer hardwired into the router via a 20m ethernet cable so I got a lappy and hardwired it with a 2m ethernet cable. The result is the same .
Not really sure what is going on if I'm getting 8meg at the phone socket, it's losing nearly all this speed passing through a filter, a phone lead 1.5m, the router and 2m of ethernet. The whole lot from filter to computer is now all new equipment.
I've even tried disconnecting the phone and Sky box phone lead from the filter with no improvement.
Am I missing something?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Sorry I forgot to ask, can you please post your ADSL stats by following this direct link; http://192.168.1.254/index.cgi?active_page=9116 << it only works if you have a Home Hub 3 and remember to type your password in!
Can you also confirm if you're connected at the master socket or an extension? And what your type your master socket is according to this picture
As standard, the bell wire should be taken out of any master or extension socket as this can reduce the amount of interference your broadband can pick up and sometimes fixes the problem, see how to remove it here http://bit.ly/4LEKJg - have you removed it?
The reason your speed is low is because your IP profile is at rock bottom so it can go and slower luckily for you! Although you need to maintain a stable connection for 3-5 days to allow the profile to catch up. If its still at 135kbps after that then we can get you in contact with people that can fix it, we need your ADSL stats to make sure you've been connected for enough time.
In response to the engineer I wouldn't know because it could be that the BT Home IT engineer has just been authorised to use the new Home Hub 3 which would sound more like the BT engineer rather than an Openreach, on the other hand it could be an Openreach thats just been authorised to use their new Infinity Modem as the old one overheated?
Regards Edd
Check your Line
BT Speedtester

WRT150N Problem with Macs - Slow Speed

Recently replaced my trusty old BEFW11S4 router with a new WRT150N - so as to have N wireless network speed for my AppleTV. But network speed is slow - way slower than it should be, easily 1/10 the speed of the BEFW11S4. The only wireless component was the AppleTV which saw the WRT150N and connected to my network, but transfer speed was dismal. My other Macs are wired connections straight to the WRT150N but they are slow now also - I had to swap back the BEFW11S4 just to get back to speed. I have TimeWarner cable modem, connected right to the router, nothing fancy here. Any suggestions? or does this thing just not like Macs?

Hi… I don’t think, you are missing something in the settings. I think you should reset and reconfigure the router. Reduce the MTU to 1356. Check the firmware. Try upgrade or re-flash the firmware.

Which Mac Pro? More cores=slower speeds? And most of us know the speed matters or FPU for music and I don't understand the faster is for the least amount of procs. And while I get the whole rendering thing and why it makes sense.

Which Mac Pro? More cores=slower speeds? And most of us know the speed matters or FPU for music and I don't understand the faster is for the least amount of procs. And while I get the whole rendering thing and why it makes sense.
The above is what the bar says. It's been a while and wondered, maybe Apple changed the format for forums. Then got this nice big blank canvas to air my concerns. Went to school for Computer Science, BSEE, even worked at Analog Devices in Newton Massachusetts, where they make something for apple.
The bottom line is fast CPU = more FPU = more headroom and still can't figure out why the more cores= the slower it gets unless it's to get us in to a 6 core then come out with faster cores down the road or a newer Mac that uses the GPU. Also. Few. I'm the guy who said a few years ago Mac has an FCP that looks like iMovie on Steroids. Having said that I called the campus one day to ask them something and while I used to work for Apple, I think she thought I still did as she asked me, "HOW ARE THE 32 CORES/1DYE COMING ALONG? Not wanting to embarrass her I said fine, fine and then hung up. Makes the most sense as I never quite got the 2,6,12 cores when for years everything from memory to CPU's have been, in sets of 2 to the 2nd power. 2,4,8,16,32,64,120,256,512, 1024, 2048,4196,8192, 72,768. Wow. W-O-W and will be using whatever I get with Apollo Quad.
Peace to all and hope someone can point us in THE RIGHT DIRECTION. THANK YOU

Thanks for your reply via email/msg. He wrote:
If you are interested in the actual design data for the Xeon processor, go to the Intel site and the actual CPU part numbers are:
Xeon 4 core - E5.1620v2
Xeon 6 core - E5.1650v2
Xeon 8 core - E5.1680v2
Xeon 12 core - E5.2697v2
I read that the CPU is easy to swap out but am sure something goes wrong at a certain point - even if solderedon they make material to absorb the solder, making your work area VERY clean.
My Question now is this, get an 8 core, then replace with 2 3.7 QUAD CHIPS, what would happen?
I also noticed that the 8 core Mac Pro is 3.0 when in fact they do have a 3.4 8 core chip, so 2 =16? Or if correct, wouldn't you be able to replace a QUAD CHIP WITH THAT? I;M SURE THEY ARE UO TO SOMETHING AS 1) WE HAVE SEEN NO AUDIO FPU OR PERHAPS I SHOULD CHECK OUT PC MAKERS WINDOWS machines for Sisoft Sandra "B-E-N-C-H-M-A-R-K-S" -
SOMETHINGS UP AND AM SURE WE'LL ALL BE PLEASED, AS the mac pro was announced Last year, barely made the December mark, then pushed to January, then February and now April.
Would rather wait and have it done correct than released to early only to have it benchmarked in audio and found to be slower in a few areas- - - the logical part of my brain is wondering what else I would have to swap out as I am sure it would run, and fine for a while, then, poof....
PEACE===AM SURE APPLE WILL BLOW US AWAY - they have to figure out how to increase the power for 150 watts or make the GPU work which in regard to FPU, I thought was NVIDIA?

My MacBook Pro is running slowly. I run Mountain Lion on it. I received the following report from Etrecheck. Can someone help me decipher it and provide me with steps to fix the slow speed?

My MacBook Pro is running slowly. I run Mountain Lion on it. I received the following report from Etrecheck. Can someone help me decipher it and provide me with steps to fix the slow speed?
Problem description:
slow computer
EtreCheck version: 2.0.11 (98)
Report generated November 15, 2014 2:57:16 PM EST
Hardware Information: ℹ️
MacBook Pro (15-inch, Mid 2012) (Verified)
MacBook Pro - model: MacBookPro9,1
1 2.3 GHz Intel Core i7 CPU: 4-core
4 GB RAM
BANK 0/DIMM0
2 GB DDR3 1600 MHz ok
BANK 1/DIMM0
2 GB DDR3 1600 MHz ok
Bluetooth: Good - Handoff/Airdrop2 supported
Wireless: en1: 802.11 a/b/g/n
Video Information: ℹ️
Intel HD Graphics 4000 - VRAM: 384 MB
NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M - VRAM: 512 MB
Color LCD 1440 x 900
System Software: ℹ️
OS X 10.8.5 (12F45) - Uptime: 6 days 7:45:47
Disk Information: ℹ️
TOSHIBA MK5065GSXF disk0 : (500.11 GB)
S.M.A.R.T. Status: Verified
disk0s1 (disk0s1) <not mounted> : 210 MB
Macintosh HD (disk0s2) / [Startup]: 499.25 GB (25.67 GB free)
Recovery HD (disk0s3) <not mounted> [Recovery]: 650 MB
HL-DT-ST DVDRW GS31N
USB Information: ℹ️
Apple Inc. FaceTime HD Camera (Built-in)
Apple Inc. BRCM20702 Hub
Apple Inc. Bluetooth USB Host Controller
Apple Computer, Inc. IR Receiver
Apple Inc. Apple Internal Keyboard / Trackpad
Thunderbolt Information: ℹ️
Apple Inc. thunderbolt_bus
Gatekeeper: ℹ️
Mac App Store and identified developers
Kernel Extensions: ℹ️
/Applications/Rowmote Helper.app
[loaded] com.regularrateandrhythm.driver.RowmoteIREmu (1.0 - SDK 10.8) Support
/System/Library/Extensions
[not loaded] com.smarttech.iokit.SMARTBoard (11) Support
[not loaded] com.tectona.driver.PL2303 (1.3.0) Support
[loaded] com.webroot.driver.WebrootSecureAnywhere (54 - SDK 10.7) Support
Problem System Launch Agents: ℹ️
[failed] com.apple.accountsd.plist
[failed] com.apple.AirPlayUIAgent.plist
[failed] com.apple.coreservices.appleid.authentication.plist
[failed] com.apple.lookupd.plist
[failed] com.apple.printtool.agent.plist
[failed] com.apple.scopedbookmarkagent.xpc.plist
Problem System Launch Daemons: ℹ️
[failed] com.apple.coresymbolicationd.plist
[failed] com.apple.wdhelper.plist
Launch Agents: ℹ️
[loaded] com.oracle.java.Java-Updater.plist Support
[running] com.smarttech.boardservice.plist Support
[running] com.smarttech.floatingtools.plist Support
[running] com.smarttech.ink.plist Support
[running] com.smarttech.SBWDKService.plist Support
[running] com.smarttech.smartnotification.plist Support
[running] com.smarttech.systemtrayicon.plist Support
[running] com.webroot.WRMacApp.plist Support
[running] com.webroot.WRMacBackNSync.plist Support
Launch Daemons: ℹ️
[loaded] com.adobe.fpsaud.plist Support
[loaded] com.microsoft.office.licensing.helper.plist Support
[loaded] com.oracle.java.Helper-Tool.plist Support
[running] com.regularrateandrhythm.rowmotehelperaide.plist Support
[running] com.webroot.security.mac.plist Support
[running] com.webroot.webfilter.mac.plist Support
User Launch Agents: ℹ️
[loaded] com.google.keystone.agent.plist Support
[running] com.spotify.webhelper.plist Support
User Login Items: ℹ️
Garmin Express Service UNKNOWN (missing value)
iTunesHelper ApplicationHidden (/Applications/iTunes.app/Contents/MacOS/iTunesHelper.app)
Dropbox Application (/Applications/Dropbox.app)
Spotify Application (/Applications/Spotify.app)
Google Chrome ApplicationHidden (/Applications/Google Chrome.app)
Rowmote Helper Application (/Applications/Rowmote Helper.app)
Internet Plug-ins: ℹ️
Flip4Mac WMV Plugin: Version: 3.2.0.16   - SDK 10.8 Support
FlashPlayer-10.6: Version: 15.0.0.223 - SDK 10.6 Support
npwebroot: Version: 2.0.15 Support
AdobePDFViewerNPAPI: Version: 11.0.06 - SDK 10.6 Support
Flash Player: Version: 15.0.0.223 - SDK 10.6 Support
AdobePDFViewer: Version: 11.0.06 - SDK 10.6 Support
QuickTime Plugin: Version: 7.7.1
SharePointBrowserPlugin: Version: 14.4.5 - SDK 10.6 Support
Unity Web Player: Version: UnityPlayer version 4.5.1f3 - SDK 10.6 Support
Silverlight: Version: 5.1.20513.0 - SDK 10.6 Support
JavaAppletPlugin: Version: Java 7 Update 51 Check version
Safari Extensions: ℹ️
Password Manager
webfilter
3rd Party Preference Panes: ℹ️
Flash Player Support
Flip4Mac WMV Support
Java Support
SMART Board Support
Time Machine: ℹ️
Time Machine not configured!
Top Processes by CPU: ℹ️
      3% WindowServer
      2% iPhoto
      2% mds
      2% mdworker
      1% Google Chrome
Top Processes by Memory: ℹ️
382 MB Mail
275 MB WebProcess
107 MB Google Chrome
103 MB WindowServer
99 MB Google Chrome Helper
Virtual Memory Information: ℹ️
270 MB Free RAM
1.50 GB Active RAM
1.30 GB Inactive RAM
1.22 GB Wired RAM
20.97 GB Page-ins
8.64 GB Page-outs

Hi Linc
I hope this is what you were after. Looking forward to hearing your feedback.
Thanks, Susanna.
11/16/14 12:36:02.738 PM com.apple.XType.FontHelper[91728]: FontHelper: message received. (<dictionary: 0x7fbb9b606ce0> { count = 2, contents =
"query" => <string: 0x7fbb9b605720> { length = 109, contents = "com_apple_ats_name_postscript == "Roboto-Regular" && kMDItemContentTypeTree != com.adobe.postscript-lwfn-font" }
"restricted" => <bool: 0x7fff7912f320>: true
11/16/14 12:36:02.738 PM com.apple.XType.FontHelper[91728]: AutoActivation: scopes (
    "/Library/Application Support/Apple/Fonts"
11/16/14 12:36:02.878 PM com.apple.XType.FontHelper[91728]: FontHelper: message received. (<dictionary: 0x7fbb9a41d950> { count = 2, contents =
"query" => <string: 0x7fbb9a41d2e0> { length = 108, contents = "com_apple_ats_name_postscript == "Roboto-Medium" && kMDItemContentTypeTree != com.adobe.postscript-lwfn-font" }
"restricted" => <bool: 0x7fff7912f320>: true
11/16/14 12:36:02.878 PM com.apple.XType.FontHelper[91728]: AutoActivation: scopes (
    "/Library/Application Support/Apple/Fonts"
11/16/14 12:36:02.889 PM com.apple.XType.FontHelper[91728]: FontHelper: message received. (<dictionary: 0x7fbb9b102580> { count = 2, contents =
"query" => <string: 0x7fbb9b100580> { length = 107, contents = "com_apple_ats_name_postscript == "Roboto-Light" && kMDItemContentTypeTree != com.adobe.postscript-lwfn-font" }
"restricted" => <bool: 0x7fff7912f320>: true
11/16/14 12:36:02.889 PM com.apple.XType.FontHelper[91728]: AutoActivation: scopes (
    "/Library/Application Support/Apple/Fonts"
11/16/14 12:36:02.898 PM com.apple.XType.FontHelper[91728]: FontHelper: message received. (<dictionary: 0x7fbb9a41d1d0> { count = 2, contents =
"query" => <string: 0x7fbb9a41d2e0> { length = 106, contents = "com_apple_ats_name_postscript == "Roboto-Bold" && kMDItemContentTypeTree != com.adobe.postscript-lwfn-font" }
"restricted" => <bool: 0x7fff7912f320>: true
11/16/14 12:36:02.898 PM com.apple.XType.FontHelper[91728]: AutoActivation: scopes (
    "/Library/Application Support/Apple/Fonts"
11/16/14 12:36:03.000 PM kernel[0]: memorystatus_thread: idle exiting pid 91723 [cfprefsd]
11/16/14 12:36:03.784 PM com.apple.launchd[1]: (com.apple.sleepservicesd[91721]) Exited: Killed: 9
11/16/14 12:36:03.000 PM kernel[0]: memorystatus_thread: idle exiting pid 91721 [SleepServicesD]
11/16/14 12:36:08.471 PM com.apple.launchd.peruser.501[159]: (com.apple.tccd[91730]) Exited: Killed: 9
11/16/14 12:36:08.000 PM kernel[0]: memorystatus_thread: idle exiting pid 91730 [tccd]
11/16/14 12:36:09.592 PM com.apple.launchd[1]: (com.apple.xpcd.F5010000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000[91727]) Exited: Killed: 9
11/16/14 12:36:09.000 PM kernel[0]: memorystatus_thread: idle exiting pid 91727 [xpcd]
11/16/14 12:36:13.129 PM com.apple.launchd[1]: (com.apple.XType.FontHelper[91728]) Exited: Killed: 9
11/16/14 12:36:13.000 PM kernel[0]: memorystatus_thread: idle exiting pid 91728 [XType.FontHelper]
11/16/14 12:36:14.996 PM com.apple.launchd[1]: (com.apple.sleepservicesd[91739]) Exited: Killed: 9
11/16/14 12:36:14.000 PM kernel[0]: memorystatus_thread: idle exiting pid 91739 [SleepServicesD]
11/16/14 12:36:20.120 PM com.apple.launchd[1]: (com.apple.cfprefsd.xpc.daemon[76618]) Exited: Killed: 9
11/16/14 12:36:20.000 PM kernel[0]: memorystatus_thread: idle exiting pid 76618 [cfprefsd]
11/16/14 12:36:23.433 PM com.apple.launchd.peruser.501[159]: (com.apple.cfprefsd.xpc.agent[76616]) Exited: Killed: 9
11/16/14 12:36:23.000 PM kernel[0]: memorystatus_thread: idle exiting pid 76616 [cfprefsd]
11/16/14 12:36:26.261 PM com.apple.launchd[1]: (com.apple.sleepservicesd[91752]) Exited: Killed: 9
11/16/14 12:36:26.000 PM kernel[0]: memorystatus_thread: idle exiting pid 91752 [SleepServicesD]
11/16/14 12:36:37.691 PM com.apple.launchd[1]: (com.apple.sleepservicesd[91764]) Exited: Killed: 9
11/16/14 12:36:38.000 PM kernel[0]: memorystatus_thread: idle exiting pid 91764 [SleepServicesD]
11/16/14 12:36:48.938 PM com.apple.launchd[1]: (com.apple.sleepservicesd[91777]) Exited: Killed: 9
11/16/14 12:36:49.000 PM kernel[0]: memorystatus_thread: idle exiting pid 91777 [SleepServicesD]
11/16/14 12:37:01.000 PM kernel[0]: memorystatus_thread: idle exiting pid 91788 [SleepServicesD]
11/16/14 12:37:00.821 PM com.apple.launchd[1]: (com.apple.sleepservicesd[91788]) Exited: Killed: 9
11/16/14 12:37:04.000 PM kernel[0]: memorystatus_thread: idle exiting pid 91706 [distnoted]
11/16/14 12:37:15.656 PM com.apple.launchd[1]: (com.apple.sleepservicesd[91795]) Exited: Killed: 9
11/16/14 12:37:15.000 PM kernel[0]: memorystatus_thread: idle exiting pid 91795 [SleepServicesD]
11/16/14 12:37:27.016 PM ReportCrash[91819]: Failed to create CSSymbolicatorRef for Webroot SecureAnywhere[264]
11/16/14 12:37:27.125 PM ReportCrash[91819]: Failed to create dSYM-less CSSymbolicatorRef for Webroot SecureAnywhere[264]
11/16/14 12:37:27.487 PM com.apple.launchd.peruser.501[159]: (com.webroot.WRMacApp[264]) Job appears to have crashed: Segmentation fault: 11
11/16/14 12:37:30.336 PM com.apple.launchd[1]: (WSDaemon[61]) Exited abnormally: Broken pipe: 13
11/16/14 12:37:34.295 PM WindowServer[79]: CGXDisableUpdate: UI updates were forcibly disabled by application "iPhoto" for over 1.00 seconds. Server has re-enabled them.
11/16/14 12:37:34.594 PM WindowServer[79]: reenable_update_for_connection: UI updates were finally reenabled by application "iPhoto" after 1.30 seconds (server forcibly re-enabled them after 1.00 seconds)
11/16/14 12:37:37.648 PM ReportCrash[91819]: Saved crash report for Webroot SecureAnywhere[264] version 8.0.7.78 (8.0.7.78) to /Users/landerson/Library/Logs/DiagnosticReports/Webroot SecureAnywhere_2014-11-16-123737_lukes-MacBook-Pro.crash
11/16/14 12:37:42.660 PM WindowServer[79]: CGXDisableUpdate: UI updates were forcibly disabled by application "iPhoto" for over 1.00 seconds. Server has re-enabled them.
11/16/14 12:37:43.632 PM WindowServer[79]: reenable_update_for_connection: UI updates were finally reenabled by application "iPhoto" after 1.97 seconds (server forcibly re-enabled them after 1.00 seconds)
11/16/14 12:37:50.783 PM WSDaemon[91822]: CGSRegisterConnectionNotifyProc called with invalid connection
11/16/14 12:38:09.909 PM Problem Reporter[91853]: launch_msg returned m

Why does CS6 no longer export images out at their boundary/artboard size? Am I missing something?

I recently upgraded to Illustrator CS6, and suddenly clients have been remarking that the file sizes are wrong or there's "a ton of white space around the logo." I checked it out, and sure enough, it appears that whenever I export a file, it does not crop it to the image boundary like it used to, even if I had manually adjusted the artboard to fit closely around it. After a bit of trial and error, I discovered that I have to click "Use Artboards" on the Export dialog each time. The super annoying part is that it doesn't STAY checked, AND it adds a number to the end of the file name. So I often forget to check it (not used to the extra step in workflow), and if I make a modification to the file, I can't just export over the previous version. It requires me to export it, go find it in finder, and manually delete the extra number off the file name. Ugh! The extra steps are adding way too much time when I'm saving out many files. I'm about ready to go back to my previous version just from this alone.
Help! Am I totally missing something? Is there an easier way to do this? It seems like the addition of this feature would only cause extra problems...

I did a quick test of this, and my CS6 Ai does indeed export to the exact size of the artboard, even if there are elements outside this boundary. Imo, this is an improvement over earlier versions: if you had some art hanging over the artboard edge in CS5, the export size would be larger than the artboard, to include even hidden paths. But CS6 is an improvement in this regard. Yes, it would be nice if your choice of "use artboard" was remembered or a choice in the prefs, but this is a small inconvenience, imo. Regarding the addition of -01, etc. to each successive export, why not just send the latest export to your client? You can delete the earlier versions later.
Another plus: if you run in 64-bit, CS5 is slow on opening each file, which is thankfully not so with CS6.
DS

Slow Speed Tests

Hay everyone I have an AirPort extreeme located in my front room about 15 feet from my bedroom. In the bedroom I have an iMac 27" mid-2011 model. I have been running speed tests from speedtest.net and have been getting very slow download rates, any where betwee 1.4 and 5.0 mbps. I pay for a 25 mbps speed. I have full signal strength everywhere in the house the speed is just terrible. Does anyone know how I can increses the speed of that computer. I have changed the channel to one that is not used as much in my area, as I looked at iStumbler. Also if I sit in the room next to the router I get 10 - 15 mbps. Any help would be amazing. Thanks.
PS I also have an AirPort express set to extend the network in the bedroom where I am having the slow speed.

I'm not able to provide a solution though I too find that the AE is not as fast as it is supposed to be. At one time I had a Belkin Wireless and an ADSL connection that topped out at 1.5MB/sec. Now I have a 50MB/sec internet connection and honestly, I have seen an increase in my speed over wireless but the Belkin really seemed quite zippy! I play World of Warcraft and I remember someone saying to me that AE or our Macs have Firewalls set-up that we don't know about or "something" that limits the speeds of the connections - which PCs and non-Apple products do not. Constantly see when downloading new patches from WOW, messages that I am behind a firewall - when I do not have firewall set on the AE nor on my Mac...

Upgraded to ADSL2 now get slower speeds than befor...

Hello
Well last Tuesday my line was upgraded to the 20mb ADSL2 and I was looking forward to some increase in bandwidth (even though before the upgrade my line was pumping 7mb most of the time which I was happy with)
Now for some reason I am getting slower speeds than before I upgraded. Something tells me I should not have bothered with the amount of effort it took to get the upgrade.
I cant understand why my DL is saying 3000+ and before upgrade it was reading 7500+
I have not reset my hub manually all disconnections have been done automatic.
Here are my router stats and I have been reading a few posts and I am hoping someone can shine some light on this for me:
BT Home Hub - DSL Connection
DSL Connection
Link Information
Uptime:
2 days, 0:36:48
Modulation:
G.992.5 annex A
Bandwidth (Up/Down) [kbps/kbps]:
687 / 3,347
Data Transferred (Sent/Received) [MB/GB]:
177.59 / 3.69
Output Power (Up/Down) [dBm]:
9.5 / 0.0
Line Attenuation (Up/Down) [dB]:
14.5 / 28.0
SN Margin (Up/Down) [dB]:
12.5 / 19.0
Vendor ID (Local/Remote):
TMMB / IFTN
Loss of Framing (Local/Remote):
0 / 0
Loss of Signal (Local/Remote):
2 / 0
Loss of Power (Local/Remote):
0 / 0
Loss of Link (Remote):
0
Error Seconds (Local/Remote):
17 / 0
FEC Errors (Up/Down):
0 / 0
CRC Errors (Up/Down):
0 / 97
HEC Errors (Up/Down):
0 / 96
Line Profile:
Fast
Software version: 6.2.6.H
Solved!
Go to Solution.

That's good to hear
Enjoy the speed
-+-No longer a forum member-+-

NJ FIOS Very slow speeds

I just recently got FIOS and everything has been good until tonight.
It seems after about 7pm my speeds have been dropped dramtically from 25/5 too 1/5
My computer is not the issue
I have already tried rebooting the modem multiple times
The slow speed seems to come on at random times and then fix itself
Could this be since FIOS just moved into my area and they are working on something around here?

It could be a problem with your connection if speeds fall past 7PM. Are you testing from a Wireless connection by chance? Know of any neighbors suddenly seeing issues?
========
The first to bring me 1Gbps Fiber for $30/m wins!

Slow speeds, am i missing something ?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for