Slow web processing

I have a brand new HP Envy Phoenix 810 (12G Ram). It should be a screamer. However, when I access the web it is pathetic. I google search an item and response is quick, but when I try to navigate within a given page it is painfully slow ans sometimes times out. I have 10 yr old Sony Vaio XP on the network as well. Just these tow machines. If I run identical side-by-side searches the old XP has no problem navigating quickly. Very disppointed with HP Phoenix. Getting it's ass kicked from a 10 yr old Sony XP.
HP technical support will not help!
Anyone have any answers will web-browsing with new machine is so slow. Speed was fine for 1st month or so, then it went to hell verrrrrry sloooooowly.
This question was solved.
View Solution.

The speed test display indicates similar speed from the ISP, so there must be a setup problem with the newer PC. Repeat of what AIOweb asked, what browser is being used? Try either FireFox or Google Chrome. I think IE has a problem on the new computer.
{---------- Please click the "Thumbs Up" to say thanks for helping.
Please click "Accept As Solution" if my help has solved your problem. ----------}
This is a user supported forum. I am a volunteer and I do not work for HP.

Similar Messages

Why are there dozens of "web process" pop ups after wipe and load of 10.6.8 on Mac Mini by Genius Bar?

I just had my Mac Mini (early 2009) in at the Genius Bar as it was running very slow. They did a multi hour scan of the harddrive, etc. Did not find any hardware problems. They did a wipe and loaded 10.6.8 on the Mini. The Apple folks were great to work with. I picked it up today and and set it all up. Using Safari, I am now going through 6-12 "Web Process" with each and every web page I go to!! Safari is completely unusable in this fashion. Can this be changed or must I use a different web browser.

Good morning,
Not quite sure what you mean by 6/12 'web process' with every page I go to. The version 5.1.7 is correct for the Snow Leopard OS X.
Run a software update, just in case the geniuses didn't, and check if you or they have installed any Safari extentions. If so delete / disable them all and try again.
If Safari then shows signs of normality, reinstall the extentions one at a time until you find the one that is causing the problem.
Oh, and have you got 'Block pop up windows' checked in Safari menu?

Safari web process - memory leak?

Mac Pro seemed to have slowed to a crawl.
Safari 5.1.2 on SL 10.6.8
Activity Monitor showed I was low on memory - over 7GB was being used by 'safari web process' - slowly close all open pages until only left with two - one was simply the 'bing' home page, the other a page that had failed to load.
Anyone else had this kind of thing recently?

Safari has a known memory leak. Open teh Activity Monitor, sort the list of apps by Real Memory column. You will find one called Safari Web Content. This is the cause. If you are running an safari extensions, they use SWafari Web Content to run, you can try turning off your extensions to see if that helps. About the only know fix now, is to close safari regularly. 5.1.2 was suppose to close some leaks but has not. There are reports you can run safari in 32bit mode but I haven't confirmed if this helps or not.

[SOLVED] SLOW web SURFING (tcpdumps attached)

THIS PROBLEM HAS ALREADY BEEN SOLVED, THANKS TO heftig from #archlinux that solved this. The solution was actually pretty simple, set tcp_window_scaling to 0:
echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_window_scaling
This is actually not gnu/linux fault at all. It's my ISP's fault. Here in Mexico, there's a cable company called "MEGACABLE", they seem to hire the system admins that now nothing or little about what they are doing, and this is exactly what caused the problem. The isp runs a transparent proxy (squid), and in the words of heftig this problem reduces to this:
"the issue is their proxy is announcing 'i understand window scaling' even though it doesn't. seems it needs a kernel upgrade"
This one issue is an isolated one, there are other issues regarding the transparent proxy, but I can live with those.
Hello, recently I've noticed my web surfing experience under archlinux is extremely slow. First I thought it was a problem with my ISP, but the problem only happened when surfing the web, if I download a file it will download it at the expected rate (5mbit). Other applications work fine (IM, pacman, ping, etc).
The first thing I did was trying with a fresh firefox profile, the problem persisted. Then I tried running it in safe mode, problem still persisted. So I tried a different web browser (konqueror) and the problem was still there. So I discarded this as a browser problem. On this same machine, I ran a virtualized windows instance (virtualbox): web surfing goes many times faster in there (using firefox too).
I manually configured NAT for the virtualized windows machine, so I'm pretty sure all traffic is flowing through my host OS (archlinux). Just to be sure it was not a firewall problem I disabled it, the slow web surfing problem persisted. I don't think this is a DNS issue either, both are using the same dns configuration and doing "nslookup archlinux.org" returns in less than a second (tried that with many other address as well).
So, just to verify what was going on I decided to do a test using tcpdump for webpage http://www.opendns.org (not using it, but this was just for testing). Below are the dumps for both native (archlinux) dump and virtualized (windows) dump. I noticed the archlinux dump shows a really small window size for packets, while the windows machine does not. Also, archlinux receives almost twice as much packets in the process than the windows machine. <-- Already solve this, thanks jargoman.
Additional information:
* there's no web proxy configured for any of the machines (except for the one behind my ISP, but that shouldn't concern me).
* I have changed MTU already (my ISP's dhcp server was setting it to 576, changed it to 1400).
* I did some more tests, sometimes (frequently) I get lots of small Push packets and the web page loads extremely slow, it goes image by image and line by line in paragraphs. Below is a dump that shows this behavior. Notice it took 600 packets to load a single page, it loaded very very slow.
ARCHLINUX DUMP
tcpdump -i eth0 -n tcp and host opendns.com
16:10:02.395080 IP 10.110.81.195.37877 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [S], seq 1164693811, win 2144, options [mss 536,sackOK,TS val 13806187 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0
16:10:02.404975 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.37877: Flags [S.], seq 3422882, ack 1164693812, win 8760, options [mss 1460,wscale 0,eol], length 0
16:10:02.405028 IP 10.110.81.195.37877 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [.], ack 1, win 17, length 0
16:10:02.405118 IP 10.110.81.195.37877 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [.], ack 1, win 17, length 536
16:10:02.405128 IP 10.110.81.195.37877 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [P.], ack 1, win 17, length 119
16:10:02.592995 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.37877: Flags [.], ack 1, win 46, length 0
16:10:02.593969 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.37877: Flags [.], ack 656, win 54, length 0
16:10:02.630362 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.37877: Flags [P.], ack 656, win 54, length 329
16:10:02.630396 IP 10.110.81.195.37877 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [.], ack 330, win 26, length 0
16:10:02.630929 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.37877: Flags [.], ack 656, win 54, length 536
16:10:02.630945 IP 10.110.81.195.37877 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [.], ack 866, win 34, length 0
16:10:02.727854 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.37877: Flags [.], ack 656, win 54, length 536
16:10:02.727909 IP 10.110.81.195.37877 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [.], ack 1402, win 42, length 0
16:10:02.728954 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.37877: Flags [.], ack 656, win 54, length 536
16:10:02.729017 IP 10.110.81.195.37877 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [.], ack 1402, win 42, length 0
16:10:02.729899 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.37877: Flags [P.], ack 656, win 54, length 536
16:10:02.729964 IP 10.110.81.195.37877 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [.], ack 2474, win 51, length 0
16:10:02.823468 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.37877: Flags [.], ack 656, win 54, length 536
16:10:02.823524 IP 10.110.81.195.37877 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [.], ack 3010, win 59, length 0
16:10:02.826161 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.37877: Flags [P.], ack 656, win 54, length 536
16:10:02.826216 IP 10.110.81.195.37877 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [.], ack 3546, win 67, length 0
16:10:02.828020 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.37877: Flags [.], ack 656, win 54, length 536
16:10:02.828042 IP 10.110.81.195.37877 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [.], ack 3546, win 67, length 0
16:10:02.828807 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.37877: Flags [.], ack 656, win 54, length 536
16:10:02.828824 IP 10.110.81.195.37877 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [.], ack 4618, win 76, length 0
16:10:02.829747 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.37877: Flags [.], ack 656, win 54, length 536
16:10:02.829766 IP 10.110.81.195.37877 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [.], ack 5154, win 84, length 0
16:10:02.918759 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.37877: Flags [.], ack 656, win 54, length 536
16:10:02.918787 IP 10.110.81.195.37877 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [.], ack 5690, win 93, length 0
16:10:02.920392 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.37877: Flags [.], ack 656, win 54, length 536
16:10:02.920449 IP 10.110.81.195.37877 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [.], ack 6226, win 101, length 0
16:10:02.923307 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.37877: Flags [P.], ack 656, win 54, length 536
16:10:02.923334 IP 10.110.81.195.37877 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [.], ack 6226, win 101, length 0
16:10:02.924339 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.37877: Flags [P.], ack 656, win 54, length 536
16:10:02.924356 IP 10.110.81.195.37877 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [.], ack 6762, win 109, length 0
16:10:02.926423 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.37877: Flags [.], ack 656, win 54, length 536
16:10:02.926441 IP 10.110.81.195.37877 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [.], ack 6762, win 109, length 0
16:10:02.927912 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.37877: Flags [.], ack 656, win 54, length 536
16:10:02.927927 IP 10.110.81.195.37877 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [.], ack 8370, win 118, length 0
16:10:02.928379 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.37877: Flags [.], ack 656, win 54, length 536
16:10:02.928398 IP 10.110.81.195.37877 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [.], ack 8370, win 118, length 0
16:10:02.929324 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.37877: Flags [.], ack 656, win 54, length 536
16:10:02.929347 IP 10.110.81.195.37877 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [.], ack 9442, win 126, length 0
16:10:02.930903 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.37877: Flags [.], ack 656, win 54, length 536
16:10:02.930924 IP 10.110.81.195.37877 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [.], ack 9978, win 134, length 0
16:10:03.015360 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.37877: Flags [.], ack 656, win 54, length 536
16:10:03.015399 IP 10.110.81.195.37877 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [.], ack 10514, win 143, length 0
16:10:03.016434 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.37877: Flags [.], ack 656, win 54, length 536
16:10:03.016496 IP 10.110.81.195.37877 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [.], ack 11050, win 151, length 0
16:10:03.017549 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.37877: Flags [P.], ack 656, win 54, length 536
16:10:03.017604 IP 10.110.81.195.37877 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [.], ack 11586, win 160, length 0
16:10:03.019564 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.37877: Flags [.], ack 656, win 54, length 536
16:10:03.019611 IP 10.110.81.195.37877 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [.], ack 12122, win 168, length 0
16:10:03.020917 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.37877: Flags [P.], ack 656, win 54, length 501
16:10:03.020936 IP 10.110.81.195.37877 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [.], ack 12623, win 176, length 0
16:10:03.022810 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.37877: Flags [.], ack 656, win 54, length 536
16:10:03.022830 IP 10.110.81.195.37877 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [.], ack 12623, win 176, length 0
16:10:03.024203 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.37877: Flags [.], ack 656, win 54, length 536
16:10:03.024218 IP 10.110.81.195.37877 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [.], ack 13695, win 185, length 0
16:10:03.024931 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.37877: Flags [P.], ack 656, win 54, length 210
16:10:03.024948 IP 10.110.81.195.37877 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [.], ack 13905, win 193, length 0
16:10:03.025535 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.37877: Flags [P.], ack 656, win 54, length 7
16:10:03.025553 IP 10.110.81.195.37877 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [.], ack 13912, win 193, length 0
16:10:03.025565 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.37877: Flags [F.], seq 13912, ack 656, win 54, length 0
16:10:03.025685 IP 10.110.81.195.37877 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [F.], seq 656, ack 13913, win 193, length 0
16:10:03.123024 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.37877: Flags [.], ack 657, win 54, length 0
16:10:04.683194 IP 10.110.81.195.37884 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [S], seq 1201807023, win 2144, options [mss 536,sackOK,TS val 13806874 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0
16:10:04.692852 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.37884: Flags [S.], seq 26796320, ack 1201807024, win 8760, options [mss 1460,wscale 0,eol], length 0
16:10:04.692919 IP 10.110.81.195.37884 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [.], ack 1, win 17, length 0
16:10:04.692994 IP 10.110.81.195.37884 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [.], ack 1, win 17, length 536
16:10:04.693004 IP 10.110.81.195.37884 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [P.], ack 1, win 17, length 224
16:10:04.706404 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.37884: Flags [.], ack 537, win 32696, length 0
16:10:04.706452 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.37884: Flags [.], ack 761, win 32584, length 0
16:10:04.908541 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.37884: Flags [.], ack 761, win 32964, length 536
16:10:04.908584 IP 10.110.81.195.37884 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [.], ack 537, win 26, length 0
16:10:04.909880 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.37884: Flags [P.], ack 761, win 32964, length 286
16:10:04.909917 IP 10.110.81.195.37884 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [.], ack 823, win 34, length 0
WINDOWS DUMP
tcpdump -i eth0 -n tcp and host opendns.com
16:09:42.130172 IP 10.110.81.195.1583 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [.], ack 9975834, win 64240, length 536
16:09:42.130216 IP 10.110.81.195.1583 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [P.], ack 1, win 64240, length 133
16:09:42.335734 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.1583: Flags [.], ack 0, win 5840, length 0
16:09:42.335774 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.1583: Flags [.], ack 669, win 6432, length 0
16:09:42.404828 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.1583: Flags [P.], ack 669, win 6432, length 329
16:09:42.405647 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.1583: Flags [.], ack 669, win 6432, length 1380
16:09:42.406125 IP 10.110.81.195.1583 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [.], ack 1710, win 64240, length 0
16:09:42.508888 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.1583: Flags [.], ack 669, win 6432, length 1380
16:09:42.509202 IP 10.110.81.195.1583 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [.], ack 1710, win 64240, length 0
16:09:42.511601 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.1583: Flags [.], ack 669, win 6432, length 1380
16:09:42.512218 IP 10.110.81.195.1583 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [.], ack 4470, win 64240, length 0
16:09:42.514308 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.1583: Flags [.], ack 669, win 6432, length 1380
16:09:42.514994 IP 10.110.81.195.1583 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [.], ack 5850, win 64240, length 0
16:09:42.608441 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.1583: Flags [.], ack 669, win 6432, length 1380
16:09:42.611712 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.1583: Flags [.], ack 669, win 6432, length 1380
16:09:42.614715 IP 10.110.81.195.1583 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [.], ack 7230, win 64240, length 0
16:09:42.616634 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.1583: Flags [.], ack 669, win 6432, length 1380
16:09:42.617770 IP 10.110.81.195.1583 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [.], ack 9990, win 64240, length 0
16:09:42.619459 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.1583: Flags [.], ack 669, win 6432, length 1380
16:09:42.620802 IP 10.110.81.195.1583 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [.], ack 11370, win 64240, length 0
16:09:42.622500 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.1583: Flags [P.], ack 669, win 6432, length 1253
16:09:42.711272 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.1583: Flags [P.], ack 669, win 6432, length 7
16:09:42.711735 IP 10.110.81.195.1583 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [.], ack 12623, win 64240, length 0
16:09:42.711757 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.1583: Flags [P.], ack 669, win 6432, length 1282
16:09:42.712316 IP 10.110.81.195.1583 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [.], ack 13912, win 64240, length 0
16:09:42.712351 IP 10.110.81.195.1583 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [F.], seq 669, ack 13912, win 64240, length 0
16:09:42.713234 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.1583: Flags [F.], seq 13912, ack 669, win 6432, length 0
16:09:42.714178 IP 10.110.81.195.1583 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [.], ack 13913, win 64240, length 0
16:09:42.819594 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.1583: Flags [.], ack 670, win 6432, length 0
16:09:43.752660 IP 10.110.81.195.1585 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [S], seq 1619761946, win 64240, options [mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK], length 0
16:09:43.802954 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.1585: Flags [S.], seq 12220252, ack 1619761947, win 8760, options [mss 1460,eol], length 0
16:09:43.803630 IP 10.110.81.195.1585 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [.], ack 1, win 64240, length 0
16:09:43.803662 IP 10.110.81.195.1585 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [.], ack 1, win 64240, length 536
16:09:43.803677 IP 10.110.81.195.1585 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [P.], ack 1, win 64240, length 237
16:09:43.814162 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.1585: Flags [.], ack 537, win 65164, length 0
16:09:43.814258 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.1585: Flags [.], ack 774, win 64927, length 0
16:09:44.017480 IP 208.69.38.150.80 > 10.110.81.195.1585: Flags [P.], ack 774, win 65535, length 823
16:09:44.186029 IP 10.110.81.195.1585 > 208.69.38.150.80: Flags [.], ack 824, win 64240, length 0
ULTRA SLOW ARCHLINUX DUMP (this is from just one request!)
tcpdump -i eth0 -n tcp and host opendns.com
http://pastebin.com/m15ee1831
What's going on here? I'm really lost. I'll really appreciate all the help you can give.
Edgar Merino
Last edited by bimbo (2009-10-27 02:46:12)

if you search Maximum Transmission Unit it's a setting in routers and can be set in windows/linux. It's the default size of a tpc packet. Or the maximum a tcp packet can be. If you can set the mtu in arch as much the windows maybe it will help. I don't really know how to do that but by looking at your tcpdump I'd say the windows mtu is 1380 and arch's is 536. Arch would need about 2.5 more packets per transmission. I think routers are set to 1400 - 1440 or so setting it above 1400 is a probably a bad idea.

Some kind of technical problems (like slow data processing)...

Some kind of technical problems (like slow data processing) with Leopard appears during the working in the local network.
OS Snow Leopard 10.6 is installed; including all updates, the computer I currently use is Mac Pro. So I have some kind of technical problems (like slow data processing) with Leopard during the working in the local network. (Windows network).
During the attempt to connect with network sharing (the computer is in the network) automounter process took approximately one minute.
Later on, after the automounter process is finished it’s working quite normally over remote computer, but when you try to automount again, everything starts from the very beginning.
The internet is working very well, it’s connected with domain, and everything is adjusted.
I use to ask our system administrator; maybe it is necessary to activate the some kind of protocol?
The OS Tiger is installed on the second hard disk, and it’s working well.
Maybe someone could help me, I try to find the similar problems, but I could not find them.
Thanks//

A couple of things.
First, thanks for the tips. I was starting to suspect the network might be an issue (bad nic, bad router, something).
But netstat -s was showing an average of about .15% packet loss. For a web server that seems to be a pretty good value so I'm not sure.
I did, however, ask someone else to look at the server because I'd spent the whole week on just server performance and was going out of my mind. This second pair of eyes really helped as he found that the pagefile for the server was set at 2mb!? Still trying to figure out how that happened. But we increased the pagefile to a much better value. There wasn't an immediate change in performance, but over time the server appears to have begun to respond better.
Occasionally I still get these 'lag spikes' but nowhere near what they were and the delay is much smaller as well, which is probably being caused by something else entirely (like bad programming on my part, hah).

Numerous "web process wants to connect to"

I did a routine update of my Macbook and now every step I take is hindered by "Web process wants to connect to...." This is driving me crazy and slowing everything down. Can't believe this is from Apple......does my virus resistant Mac have a bug?!? (I am not very savvy-keep the tech talk simple)

Hi Andrew, I'm experiencing a similar problem but only via my email when I try to access information via links from BT uk. I get the following message and I've no idea how to respond to this as no matter what I do I can't access the information!
Any ideas? I hope that I'm not giving any crucial personal information away with this snap shot!

Slow web page loads on Mac, but not for PC

I use a D-Link wireless router (DI-524) for my PowerBook G4 15" and my roommate's Dell PC. Very recently I seem to get very slow web page loads with some pages not even loading at all.
Airport is consistently connected with no drops at all and when I'm downloading something it never gets interrupted the whole way through.
My roommate's PC has no problem whatsoever and all of the web pages that he visits load instantly. It seems that my main problem is with web pages.
I've tried doing a clean install on my Powerbook, I've tried resetting the router (I've tried upgrading the firmware but the router decided it didn't want to work with the new version). And surprisingly, I get the same slow speeds when I hook up my Powerbook to my router via ethernet cable. The only time my speeds are perfectly fine is when I hook up my Powerbook directly to the wall (I dorm in a university so we have a T3 line).
Can someone please give me some advice on this very frustrating issue?

In addition to Neds suggestions, empty the Safari cache (which should be empty after a clean install).
Goto the Safari Get Info screen (in Finder or in Dock if you have Safari there), click the triangle on languages, and disable those you don't use.
My Safari response time was significantly slowed after the 10.4.5 update, and using the combo updater took care of that. The 10.4.6 combo update is located here.

WebI Processing servers stuck after reach memory threshold

Hello all,
since few day, we encounter several issue with Web Intelligence Processing Server.
In the CMC, the server is stuck in starting mode. It seems appear when the server reach maximum memory threshold (configured at 1.8GB)
FP2.1 has been installed on the application server and the issue is still here. We have created 3 more WebI servers (4 in total : 1 by processor) always stuck...
We actually used a script to automatically killed WebI processes when the memory threshold is reached but it's only a workaround...
Has someone ever had this problem? How did you fix? Is there a problem in my configuration(see below)?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Vincent
Architecture :
Applications Server :
Windows 2003 x64 SP2
Database Server :
HP-UX 11.23
Oracle 10.2.0.2
Web Intelligence Processing Service
Document Cache Cleanup Interval (seconds): 120
Binary Stream Maximum Size (MB): 50
Cache Timeout (minutes): 4370
Memory Maximum Threshold (MB): 1800
Idle Document Timeout (seconds): 5400
Server Polling Interval (seconds): 120
Universe Cache Maximum Size (Universes): 20
Disable Cache Sharing
Images Directory:
Maximum Document Cache Size (KB): 1000000
Output Cache Directory:
Maximum Documents per User: 5
Allow Document Map Maximum Size Errors
Maximum Documents Before Recycling: 50
Maximum Connections: 200
Idle Connection Timeout (minutes): 60
Maximum List Of Values Size (entries): 50000
Enable List Of Values Cache : X
Enable Real-time Cache : X
Maximum Document Cache Reduction Space (MB): 70
Maximum Documents in Cache: 0
Memory Upper Threshold (MB): 1000
Enable Memory Analysis : X
Enable Document Cache : X
List Of Values Batch Size (entries): 1000
Maximum Custom Sort Size (entries): 100
Memory Lower Threshold (MB): 1000
Timeout Before Recycling (seconds): 3600
Maximum Character Stream Size (MB): 5

Hello Seb,
unfortunately, the reports are launched by the customer and I don't have any control on it...
The last solution provided by OSS SAP call was to install FP2.1 but it didn't solved the issue.
Any other idea ?
Vincent

Ensure that a webi processing server is dedicated to a certain publication

Hi there
I'am working on setting up a BO XI 3.1 sp6 cluster. I would like to ensure that heavy monthly publications will run correctly even if one or many users launch very long report s at the same time. ( both DESKI ans WEBI)
The idea was to define a servers group and to dedicate our montly publications to these group. But it seems that it is not possible to prevent other publications to use servers of this group and overload them.
Is there a workaround, or at least a way to reduce the probability of such a problem?
thanks in advance for ideas!

Hi Irfan,
Thanks for taking time to answer.
I already considered the actions you describe, but I concluded that it was not a solution.
But, maybe I'm wrong!
For instance if my monthly publication start at 20:00, It will use the defined webi processing server in the "pubServerGroup".
If some users launch a heavy refresh or "instant scheduled" at 19:54, he may use the very webi Processing Server as it could be the "first available server".
In fact I'm afraid that this will reduce the efficiency of the default load balancing system.
Or, maybe, when a publication is scheduled at 20:00 its server group is flagged as “non available” even a few minutes before? It is not very likely, is it?
regards
Marc

Do i need web kit 2 web process i keep getting high usage errors

Do i need the file webkit 2 web process? i keep getting high usage errors

Problem solved, though awkwardly. Changed my default browser to Chrome. Since this problem was issues encountered using Safari, that eliminated them. I'd had Chrome installed on my Mac for a long time, but only used it sporadically because I never found it as fast as and I just preferred Safari. But I'm finding now that it's been set as default and I'm not running them both at the same time that Chrome is actually living up to the zippy-speeds Google always said it had. So yay! for me.

HELP: Many "web process" spin logs in Console in Clean Install Lion 10.7

I get many "web process" spin logs in Console in a new clean install of Lion 10.7
It shows as: WebProcess_2011-08-16-143300_Georges-MacBook in System Diagnostic reports.
Can anyone read the log and tell me what's going on ? Wha'
I would like to attach the report but it says it's too big.
I upoaded the log so you can read them please and tell me what's going on. You can download the logs from:
https://www.transferbigfiles.com/047155b5-d354-928b-a575-1a2b2c704de7?rid=SFe8yy UwA02dICkYhxGglw%3d%3d

I get many "web process" spin logs in Console in a new clean install of Lion 10.7
It shows as: WebProcess_2011-08-16-143300_Georges-MacBook in System Diagnostic reports.
Can anyone read the log and tell me what's going on ? Wha'
I would like to attach the report but it says it's too big.
I upoaded the log so you can read them please and tell me what's going on. You can download the logs from:
https://www.transferbigfiles.com/047155b5-d354-928b-a575-1a2b2c704de7?rid=SFe8yy UwA02dICkYhxGglw%3d%3d

Web Process + Safari now hogging 50-75% more memory than Safari 5.0.5 did

Now that Apple has split Safari into two processes — Web Process (handles page loads and other traffic) and Safari (handles interface, bookmarks, history, etc) — these two processes together are using 50% to 75% more memory than Safari did before the upgrade to 5.1.
Three days ago, the most RAM I'd ever seen Safari hog (after several hours of surfing multiple tabs) was 1.1GB (still way more than it needed, once back down to 3 or 4 tabs).
Today, after surfing only an hour:
WebProcess 1.3GB
Safari 552MB
Anyone else seeing this? And anyone have ideas about limiting this memory hogging?

Well, to add a little more frustraton to this thread, a few weeks ago, when I first saw all the bugginess with this "update", I called Apple, was handed up to a higher-level tech person. He told me they were aware of all these problems, and promised me a fix would be released "ASAP". Well, a few weeks later, & of course, no fix. About a week ago, I called again, & was handed to a different higher-level guy, but this time he gave the same tired, "you should disable all your extensions & plug-ins" blah, blah, blah... And worse, he told me that he's heard nothing from users about issues with Safari!!!
Well, I then asked him if the problem really was one or some of the add-ons, why couldn't Apple just give us a list of at least some of the more popular ones that don't work. Why should ever single user have to go thru a one by one, trial & error, add one, then restart, then another, etc, since Apple could just do it, & let us know. Of course, that's never happened, so everyone has been trying anything they can, &/or resorting to using other browsers, & posting here & other places. I sure hope Apple quits stonewalling everyone, you would think they would address this, either by fixing it quickly, or at least letting everyone know they are aware of it, and that a fix will be coming, but pretending they no see, no hear nothing, and it's all in our heads, well, ...... it shucks.

Recently bought a samsung NX30 camera which came with lightroom 5, after several hours of googling i got it setup properly with the correct camera raw to be able to access my raw images. I found my old laptop was very slow when processing the hundreds of

recently bought a samsung NX30 camera which came with lightroom 5, after several hours of googling i got it setup properly with the correct camera raw to be able to access my raw images. I found my old laptop was very slow when processing the hundreds of images I usually take on a weekly basis. I bought a new faster laptop but when I looked for the cd with the software and serial I could not find it in the Xmas clutter. I downloaded a trial version of lightroom and got it working on my new laptop. Is there a way to access the serial number from my previously installed version and insert it into the trail version to make it work for me?
Myron

Mea culpa
While i registered all my cs2 thru 6 versions and my lightroom 2 thru 4 versions and recorded the serials and saved the adobe registration emails. Since this came as a freebee with the camera i neglected this vital step. I have the instslled version on my old laptop but want to install it on my new one. Thanks to Jim Hess I got the serial so all is well in my world and I will register it with ADOBE
Myron

Web Kit 2 Web Process,exe has stopped working?What is this and how do I get rid of it.

Web Kit 2 Web Process,exe has stopped working? What is this and how do I get rid of it.

I am not a Windows user but I have found several useful links for you here:
https://encrypted.google.com/search?q=WebKit2WebProcess.exe&as_qdr=all&newwindow =1&num=100

I keep getting a pop-up WEBKIT 2 WEB PROCESS.exe has stopped working and then I can't do anything -- any suggestions as to how I can get rid of this one?

I keep getting a pop-up WEBKIT 2 WEB PROCESS.exe has stopped working and then I can't do anything -- any suggestions as to how I can get rid of this one?
but i using safari on windows7.

Uninstall Safari and reinstall:
Safari 5.1.7 for Windows - Support - Apple
If this doesn't work, I suggest migrating to a different browser given that: Farewell Windows Safari, as Apple excludes its homegrown browser ...

Slow web processing

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for