Slowness interacting with CS5.5 file the deeper into the file you go

I have a rather large CS5.5 document that doesn't initially start slow; but as I scroll deeper into the file, the cpu usage will spike and cause ID to become unresponsive. The technical specs of the iMac that ID runs on are well above what is required by ID and every other document opened in ID runs just fine. One factor that may play into this situation was that the original file was created using CS3 and opened directly into CS5.5. Unfortunately the original CS3 file no longer exists.
I've tried breaking the file into smaller 80 page trunks but the problems persists. All links are in working order. Any ideas?

ashmuehlba wrote:
One factor that may play into this situation was that the original file was created using CS3 and opened directly into CS5.5. Unfortunately the original CS3 file no longer exists.
That's potentially problematic, especially if this file behaves differently form other simialr files created in CS5.5. I'd try an export to .idml and see if it helps: Remove minor corruption by exporting

Similar Messages

False message: The document name you requested (/selector_test.html) could not be found on this server. However, we found documents with names similar to the one you requested.

When I specify http://www.celticmanner.com/selector_test.html to Firefox 6.01, I get the false message:
Multiple Choices
The document name you requested (/selector_test.html) could not be found on this server. However, we found documents with names similar to the one you requested.
Available documents:
/selector_test.txt (common basename)
The file http://www.celticmanner.com/selector_test.html IS PRESENT on the host.
The file http://www.celticmanner.com/selector_test.txt IS NOT. (It had been earlier.)
I do not find the text "selector_test.txt" anywhere on my partition C! Where does Firefox retain a pointer to this file that no longer exists? And why?
NB: The text "could not be found on this server" is sloppy. That message is not issued from a servcer, but from the instance of Firefox on my computer. The message should read "could not be found on the specified server".
B. Somers

I have the same problem and it does not have to do with firefox. Do you have any idea how to fix it through?

Since you don't allow emails any more – I suspect because of the numerous complaints with your service and the way you treat people that you don't want documented, I am calling and I want this call recorded for future reference. I have been a long time fa

Since you don’t allow emails any more – I suspect because of the numerous complaints with your service and the way you treat people that you don’t want documented, I am calling and I want this call recorded for future reference.
I have been a long time faithful customer of vzw and although the past year I have been late on payments many times and really couldn’t afford your exorbitant prices for services lots of other companies offer sometimes three times cheaper than what you charge, I have hung in there trying my best to meet my obligations.
This month has been no exception. You don’t know the background; the whole story of people’s lives. I know you could care less because all you care about is the profit-the money that comes in.
I was told when I agreed to pay my bill on the third per the recorded message that I had 14 days to pay…you cut me off anyway. The phones are not the tissue; your suspending my service means I cannot work. I may lose my job…how do you justify that? In any case? The least you could do would be to keep 4986 on and cut the phones off. But no. You refuse to compromise and meet the basic needs of your customer. What does that say about your company? I tried to call back on three separate occasions to tell you I couldn’t pay because of unexpected expenses but couldn’t get out of the automated system…sadly couldn’t get to a real person which also speaks volumes to me.
All this tells me this is a company I don’t wish to be affiliated with any more. As soon as I can, I will discontinue service with you…I know you could care less. I will honor the remaining portion of the contract but that’s it. You don’t deserve my business. I am a good, hardworking person who, at the sacrifice of myself and my needs, always pays her bills…albeit late at times. I realize others tell you stories and lies to justify themselves. That’s not me. If you knew what I had been through the last 7 yrs you would marvel that I am still on my feet…don’t judge too quickly. You could be wrong…and in my eyes you are by doing this to me.
God will see us through this extremely scary time of that I have no doubt. No thanks to your company and lack of understanding and mercy. I am doing the best I can. Sadly you are not.
See I have choices. MANY choices of providers for services you offer. I don’t have to be treated like this. I don’t have to succumb to your coldness and callousness. I intend to choose better (and cheaper). If your company doesn’t get the “people factor” back you will be sorry.

Problem here is you admit you cannot afford the service.
And you want to blame Verizon for losing a job because you have no cell phone.
If your job depends on that phone I would pay it on time every time if you need a job to pay your bill.
No other service is going to treat you any different. And if you cannot afford Verizon's monthly invoice how are you going to afford new devices, activation fees, possible security deposits on any other cellular carrier? You can't.
Also if you made an arraignment to pay and then decide you cannot do so, why should Verizon extend you service or credit, or why is it you want to use the service and data and not pay for it as agreed.
Get a prepay phone. Its evident the cost is too high for you to afford on post pay.
Good Luck

IPhoto 6 unusably slow (starting with keywords and then the rest o product)

As I've mentioned in a post in another thread, I upgraded to iPhoto 6 a few weeks ago. From the moment of upgrade, anything associated with the keyword function (applying, searching, even scrolling the keyword box) is painfully slow--60 seconds to 3+ minutes at a time (that's the average--I've had waits of 90 seconds to apply 1 keyword to 1 photo and 8 minutes to apply 1 keyword to 27 photos). Since that last post, I've also discovered that the longer I try to use the product, the slower EVERYTHING in the product gets (other than scrolling the library).
I use iPhoto as a database, not an image editor. To give you an idea of what I'm talking about, the types of things I'm trying to do include:
* apply one keyword to 30 photos
* click on one photo after having assigned a keyword to a different subset of photos
* scroll down one page in the keyword box
* select 4 photos
* scroll one page in the main iPhoto view of photos
* search by keyword
I've re-installed, re-built, and re-started. I can also say that the longer I try to use iPhoto 6 in one session, the worse the performance gets. Yesterday morning I had to keyword 150 photos from a party and forced myself to use iPhoto so they could be searched with another set of pictures already in iPhoto. It took me OVER 1 HOUR to assign an average of 6 keywords to each photo with selections averaging 10-15 photos at a time. I am not exaggerating--I timed it (63 minutes). For the record, no other applications were running: iPhoto was flying solo (I thought running alone might help performance, but it didn't. I'm no software programmer but I have a lot of experience with computers and whatever is tying iPhoto's resources into a knot seems to be between iPhoto and iPhoto or iPhoto and the OS.)
Also, the longer I used the product, the fewer "actions" it saw. So, for example, at the beginning I could click 3 keywords on the same keyword pane view and all 3 would apply to the selected photos (with a still dismal response, but at least I was getting 3 assignments for each response). By the end, only 1 assignment would be "seen" at a time even if 3 were clicked (and the other 2 would be translated into some random actions as iPhoto would scroll the keyword pane and assign a random keyword--not necessarily on the same side or the same position on the screen of the keywords I had actually clicked). The result? The functional response time tripled.
The product is not only much worse than iPhoto 5, it's unusably slow. Sadly, I've already upgraded. So I'm wondering if anyone can tell me:
1) Is there any way to know officially if Apple is addressing this specific problem? I know other people are experiencing this and thought there would be a fix from Apple by now, but nothing.
2) Is there any way to bail out of iPhoto 6 and go back to iPhoto 5? I know there's no official path, but (A) is there any unofficial path and (B) what would I lose?
3) Since iPhoto 6 is the only iLife product I use, I feel especially ripped-off. What I'd really like to do is get a refund and pursue a different solution. Any thoughts there?
G4 Mac OS X (10.4.6)
G4 Mac OS X (10.4.6)

Old Toad
Since I last wrote I have:
* Rebuilt the directories with Disk Warrior. The problems I had were 30+ overlaps between iPhoto images and iTunes song files.
This got rid of the 8 minute responses, but performance was still unusably appalling.
* I cleaned out the user caches with OnyX.
No change in iPhoto performance.
* I reinstalled iPhoto. (Because of the overlaps I also tried to reinstall iTunes but it doesn't have an obvious path for that. Given the number of hours I've already burned on this Apple problem I didn't have the fight in me for another one).
No change.
* Per another post in this forum I emptied iPhoto trash, then per Old Toad I rebuilt the iPhoto library with the first 3 options.
Noticeable improvement, but the performance is still dreadful.
* Did a re-install and archive of OS X (per a friend's suggestion) and downloaded all the system updates anew.
No improvement.
So after rebuilding my system from the directories up, re-installing iPhoto, and rebuilding the iPhoto library I'm "back to" 30 second to 3+ minute waits for everything when the Photo Info pane is active. For example, it takes 30-90 second waits for tasks such as:
* changing a tab in the Photo Info pane
* trying to scroll the Keywords tab of the Photo Info pane
* assign 1 keyword to 1 photo
It takes 2-3+ minute waits for tasks such as:
* scrolling the main window (one click in the scroll bar--not dragging) when the Photo Info pane is open
* assigning 1 keyword to 36 photos
* closing the Photo Info pane (AFTER however many minutes it took for the final commit i did before trying to exit)
My observations:
* When the ball is spinning on the screen, iPhoto doesn't "remember" what I do as other applications do, although the Keywords pane will occasionally scroll backward or forward--apparently randomly--in response to a single click anywhere in iPhoto. (And I'm not one of those people who bangs on the keyboard constantly when the computer is busy: I'm talking about a click that might get in before the ball starts spinning on the screen.)
* The first "click" after opening the Photo Info Pane (either the Keywords tab or the first keyword box) is always "free"--no problem with excessively long waits. The second click after after a "free" click always has the burdensome wait times. Occasionally, though, in the first 3-5 clicks in the Photo Info pane the first click after what I'm assuming is a commit does not have the painful wait times. After those first 3-5 clicks, though, every click gets this excessive wait.
* It seems odd to me how consistent the minimum wait is: right around 30 seconds. The click is either "free"--i.e. no perceptible wait time (or a reasonably minimal wait, given the task at hand)--or it's 30+ seconds.
These response times really do make the product unusable for me. Does anyone:
1) Have any other suggestions?
2) Know how I can find out whether this problem is being pursued by Apple?
3) Know of any path out of the product so I can put myself out of my misery?………
G4 Mac OS X (10.4.6)

Very slow scrolling with CS5

I don't know if other people also have this problem, but I noticed an issue which makes Photoshop CS5 completely useless for me: It is scrolling incredibly slow. With CS4 I am able to scroll much faster and with different speeds. In CS5 it seems like the speed is limited. No matter how much I scroll with my mouse, Photoshop keeps scrolling at the same speed.
It seems like it is not only me: The only website concerning this problem I was able to find is:
http://macperformanceguide.com/OptimizingPhotoshopCS5-Issues.html
Unacceptable scrolling speed with center button
I use the scroll wheel in the center of the Apple mouse constantly. In CS5, this functionality is now broken, because CS5 scrolls only a small amount, very different from CS4. There is no apparent work-around.
Reader Joe N agrees:
I saw your posting about CS5 issues, and I want to add another STRONG vote for the Photoshop mouse wheel scrolling speed issue. I use a Magic Mouse, and the scrolling speed is so poor in PS CS5 that it is totally blocking my creative flow. I have scoured the web for a solution and have not found anything yet...
I also use a Magic Mouse and a MacBook Pro with Snow Leopard. Is there any hope of a fix or a workaround?

Thanks so much for replying, Chris. I've just started using CS5 and only used CS4 for a couple of weeks. There are so many variables. and I don't think it's just Photoshop. I'm wondering if the same problems happen in windows 7 (I switched to the Mac the last time I bought a computer.) Probably it's just that everything gets more complicated along with the improvements. : -(
Thanks again,
Peggy

Numbers 09 is slow dealing with relatively large files

As some of you might know, Excel 2008 is painfully slow when opening relatively large files (about 12000 rows and 28 columns) that have simple 2D x-y charts. FYI, Excel 2004 doesn't have the same problem (and Excel 2003 in the XP world is even better). I purchased iWork09 hoping that Numbers 09 will help, but unfortunately I have the same problem. iWok09 takes more than 5 minutes to open the file - something the older versions of Excel could do in seconds. When the file opens up, it is impossible to manipulate it. I have a MacBook with 2.4 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo and 4GB of RAM running OS x (version 10.5.6).
Has anybody else experienced the same problem? If so, is there a bug in iWork09, or is it because it isn't meant to deal with large files.
I appreciate your response.

Numbers '08 was very slow.
Numbers '09 is not so slow but it's not running like old fashioned spreadsheets.
I continue to think that it's a side effect of the use of xml to describe thr document.
We may hope that developers will discover programming tips able to fasten the beast.
Once again, I really don't understand why users may buy an application before testing it with the FREE 30 days demo available from Apple's Web page.
Yvan KOENIG (from FRANCE dimanche 8 mars 2009 13:13:18)

CS6 - does import DV files used with CS5. File conversion is N.G. Help!

Trying to upgrade from CS5 to CS6. Upgraded one NLE and found CS6 will not import DV files that were used with CS5. Can't believe Adobe missed this one! We create many DV files each day that can't be used with CS6. Any sort of conversion would just add another unnecessary step. Do I need to stay with CS5 or is there a fix? Thanks.

1st - More information needed for someone to help... please click below and provide the requested information
-PPro Information FAQ http://forums.adobe.com/message/4200840
2nd - exactly what is inside your video file?
Codec & Format information, read both links in reply #1 http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1270588
Report back with the codec details of your file, use the programs below... A screen shot works well to SHOW people what you are doing
http://forums.adobe.com/thread/592070?tstart=30 for screen shot instructions
Find file information for PC/Mac http://mediaarea.net/en/MediaInfo/Download

Can i use flash for ui and interact with c++ builder for the rest

i know flash can be used in c# in visual studio but i dont remember a thing of this interaction.
is it possible to interact with c++ builder and how?
the scenario is simple
use flash for UI (showing-viewing data) maybe for a kiosk or something without mouse simply with touch input,
use c++ builder for the rest , database connection data proccessing etc
any info will be greatly appreciated
thanks

I would advise proper punctuation and grammar on a public forum, but to answer your questions, yes, yes you can! Flash can be used to produce any commercial imagery or animations for the purpose of making profit, as long as you have a valid license you purchased from Adobe. You bought it, you can use it for whatever you want.
By "book", I assume you mean the "tutorial" book series made by Adobe? If so, the name of the series is "Classroom in a Book", there's one for each versions of Flash. Personally it hasn't been of much use and I would advise simply practicing by yourself and getting familiar with the tools. Look for online tutorials and publicly available projects and see how they work.

Help! Every app crashes when interacting with plain text files

I recently bought a 13" i7 MacBook Air. I love its design and I found OS X Lion unbelievably fast on it, yet I find myself in a very dark situation, now.
From the Finder to iA Writer, to TextEdit, every single app crashes when working with plain text files. In Finder’s column view I don’t even have to open them: the instant one .txt is selected, Finder crashes.
Creating a new user account seems to fix the bug for that account, but I just spent one whole day copying files from my old work MacBook (where Lion opened .txt files without a problem) to the new account and losing another entire day of work because of a stupid bug is out of question. Also, I feel it would be a very temporary fix. What if the bug presented itself again? Would I have to create a third, a fourth account, and so on?
I didn’t use any migration tool because I wanted a very clean installation.
On top of that, the machine is as App Store–only as one could be. The only “internet” apps I have on it are Chrome (for the occasional Flash video), Movist (I can’t work with Quicktime’s flying controls), and nvALT. I didn’t even had the time to install the Creative Suite on this one. I can’t for the life of me think this is app–related. I suspect it’s some weird OS bug.
I work in advertising, and I do some work in Adobe’s Creative Suite but *all* my copy is stored in plain text files. I always did it that way so that my files would be future–proof. It is kind of ironic now. So please, if anyone as the slightest idea of how to fix this, please, please, help. I find myself with a brand new computer I can’t use for work.
Alessandro

What are the files named?
Where are they being made? (What folder?)

VERY slow print with CS5 mail merge

Creating a newsletter in CS5 Indesign. Using "mail merge". Total database is 900 names. Tried using in blocks of 100 at a time and still takes at least an hour to print. Is there a way to reduce resolution or something to cut print time? Printing both sides of 11x17 black/white on Minolta Postcript printer.

It's simply to do with the amount of data which is going to the printer/RIP. Assuming the newsletter was two pages, then over 900 records means that 1800 pages are going to the printer/RIP. It's the equivalent of printing a dictionary.
Assuming that the Minolta printer is a desktop printer being merged to via merge to Print, then the option I would take is to make the InDesign file as lightweight as possible e.g. make sure images placed are no larger in resolution than they need to be, etc. Its not something that could really be done through the print dialog box as there aren't enough options to choose from.
Otherwise, could merge to a PDF first and then choose the downsample options prior to the merging of the file.
Hope this helps.

I want to talk with a representative of the chat, you can get a link to it

I took acreage on the PC, and the software is installed fixed and mobile me, I bought a new computer, and I removed the old computer software, and is showing me all the time I have left a 20 day etc ... I purchased in Israel told me you have to reset my serial number ... this is my serial number: [removed by moderator] My computer is a PC It is urgent to me!

For the link below click the Still Need Help? option in the blue area at the bottom and choose the chat option...
Serial number and activation chat support (non-CC)
http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/global/service1.html ( http://adobe.ly/1aYjbSC )

Interaction with Flash files

Hi,
Whats the easiest way to interact with a flash file from flash builder?
I wish to change the speed of a tween in a flash file based on a value set in flash builder.
Do you have to do make my flash file a component? .. Could someone point me in the direction of building components in flash builder?
Thanks
Aidan

The multi-SCO intro video shows it packaging Flash and Dreamweaver as single SCOs and they are both part of Adobe's e-learning suite.
I know Flash has learning elements and Dreamweaver has the course builder extension but I need to package Flash with no learning elements. I have the content of a couple of dozen courses in Flash and I can build the quiz easily enough.
Is there anything that can package up a single Dreamweaver (with embedded Flash) as a single SCO in the same way that the SCORM runtime wrapper used to do before it became out of date?

Do I interact with the browser or Plug-in

I am interested in how Flash gets displayed in a web browser
and how much of the interaction and display is dependant on the web
browser.
If you interact with a flash application on a web browser are
you really interacting with the browser first which passes on the
message to the Flash plug-in. Or after an initial set up is all
interaction with the Flash application directly dealt by the
Plug-in where the browser has essentially no idea what is
happening?
For example when I click on a "Skip" button on a flash
animation shown on a web page, am I clicking on the browser or the
Flash plug-in that is installed on the browser?
I hope explained that clearly enough,
Thanks

I'm assuming fireflox with an L in the name is a typo?
If not, can you provide more detail about the plugin? Who is the publisher, where is it installed, what is it for, etc.?
By the way, if you see plugin-container.exe in the Task Manager, that is used to isolate Flash from firefox.exe so that crashes in Flash do not kill your entire browsing session. That's normal.
Regarding extensions, which ones did you disable that become re-enabled on their own? If you don't want an extension, you should be able to remove it. If it was installed by third party software, then usually you can remove it through the Windows Control Panel and/or options in the related software.

Cannot click or interact with a certain part of my screen in most apps

This is a weird one that's stumping me. Since probably Tuesday or Wednesday, I've had trouble clicking on certain portions of the screen on my MacBook. I noticed it first in Safari, and I thought that it was just a Safari problem, but now I realize it applies to the whole OS.
When I am in an app, I cannot click on anything or scroll when my mouse is on a certain portion of the screen. The weirdest part to me is that this portion of the screen is standard for every app. It's probably about the middle 50 or 60 percent of my screen in the lower third portion. Imagine cutting my MacBook screen into a Tic-Tac-Toe board... the lower middle box is where I'm having trouble.
This seems to apply to most apps, but for example in iTunes I can still click on items in this portion of the screen but only about every third click will it be responsive. With Safari and Finder and most other apps, I get nothing at all. It's not my mouse itself because it does the same thing if I'm using my Mighty Mouse or my Logitech mouse or just my trackpad. Also, if I navigate using the keyboard, I can interact with that portion of the screen just fine.
I can't recall installing or removing or changing anything significant within the past week that could have caused this, though it's entirely possible. I'm pretty good with my Mac on most things, but as I said, this one is stumping me and I can't find any similar issues by searching.
Thanks in advance for any help.

Got the exact same problem aswell, finally fed up with it now as i just started up firefox and 14 new windows opened because of this bug, luckily my computer can handle them but someone with a slower processor it would have been a nightmare, needs fixing ASAP.
Reverting back to 3.6.3 until this issue is solved. (link for anyone wanting to do the same below)
http://www.filehippo.com/download_firefox/7345/

BOOST ERRORS porting cs4 to cs5 , compiling plugin with cs5 sdk

i have a project that is working fine with adobe indesign CS4 and now when im trying to build it with cs 5 , i got this error
boost::move ambigous call to overloaded function in CS5 sdk file file "any_regular.hpp"
im using VS2008 and boost version 1.49 in my project, i gues its compatability issue of boost with CS5 Sdk

Pectora:
Check the C++/Preprocessor/Preprocessing Definitions field in your Project Properties dialog. Make sure that your Debug version has a "DEBUG" definition placed in there, and that your release version has an "NDEBUG" definition placed in there someplace. My guess is that either you left one of them out, or that you have the DEBUG definition in your release properties. Other possibilities are a failure to separate definitions properly or misspelling.
HTH!
P.S. I am assuming that you are working with VS8 on a Windows box. This information should be included in your next submission just to make sure we are all working from the same starting point.

Slowness interacting with CS5.5 file the deeper into the file you go

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for