SM35 session is not getting processed in background
HI Folks,
I am using BDC (open group, Insert group, Close Group) to create a SM35 session and calling RSBDCSUB program to process created session.
this program is being executed in background job,
Issue is, when this program is scheduled to run with my user ID(dialog user) is running fine i.e. session is getting processed completely.
however, when job is schedule with background user, session is getting created with status NEW, but not processed, we have to go to SM35 and manually process that session.
Does anybody come across such issue, What could be the reason, I could see authorization might be the problem.
please advice.
Thanks,
Brahma,
Hi brahmanandam,
You need use RSBDCSUB and submit it using the session name u generated...
SUBMIT RSBDCSUB AND RETURN
USER SY-UNAME
using selection-set 'VAR'.
Where VAR is ur variant name
Similar Messages
-
IDOC status 64 not getting processed.
Hi Gurus,
I have a problem where IDOC's with status 64 are not getting processed via background job. the IDOCs weere getting processed with the background job till today evening, but suddenly no changes were made and the processing of IDOC's with status 64 has stopped and they keep filling up, when i checked the log of the Background job it says finished, and the log has the following information,
17.09.2009 19:05:23 Job started 00 516 S
17.09.2009 19:05:23 Step 001 started (program RBDAPP01, variant POS_IDOCS, user ID SAPAUDIT) 00 550 S
17.09.2009 19:05:25 No data could be selected. B1 083 I
17.09.2009 19:05:25 Job finished 00 517 S
Kindly advise on this.
Regards,
Riaz.When i process the IDOC's using BD87, they gets processed wiwth out aany issues no dump is displayed, idoc gets a status 53 after processing via BD87.
There is another problem how ever there are other jobs scheduled to run in the background other than this background job which are getting cancelled and have two different error logs for different jobs they are as follows.
1) 18.09.2009 02:00:06 Job started 00 516 S
18.09.2009 02:00:06 Logon not possible (error in license check) 00 179 E
18.09.2009 02:00:06 Job cancelled after system exception ERROR_MESSAGE 00 564 A
2) 18.09.2009 00:55:27 Job started 00 516 S
18.09.2009 00:55:27 Step 001 started (program RSCOLL00, variant , user ID JGERARDO) 00 550 S
18.09.2009 00:55:29 Clean_Plan:Gestartet von RSDBPREV DB6PM 000 S
18.09.2009 00:55:29 Clean_Plan:beendet DB6PM 000 S
18.09.2009 01:00:52 ABAP/4 processor: DBIF_RSQL_SQL_ERROR 00 671 A
18.09.2009 01:00:52 Job cancelled 00 518 A
This is a production server and the Licence is valid till 31.12.9999, and has no issues with the license. -
Batch Input Session for RFUMSV50 is not getting processed.
Dear All,
When i am trying to transfer the Service Tax Inetrim account to Service tax final account with the help of the program RFUMSV50 the batch input session is getting generated without any error. But when i process the same in SM35 it is not getitng processed.
Please advice on this.
Regards,
Rajeswari Shankar.Hello Rajeswari,
Yes, this is normal.
When batch input sessions is generated with any error, this does not mean that you can execute it after via SM35 without any error
Moreover, you have the option in SM35 to execute it and with option "display error only", so this means that it can happen that there is no error
For example, the profit center is mandatory, and it is missing in the document. In that case the system will display error and ask you to fulfill the profit center
Please tell me, which error you have (message number)
Thanks
Tarek -
Article IDoc not getting processed in PI for particle article type
Hello All,
I have an strange behaviour in my system.
i.e 1, we are creating an article IDOC by using BD10 for particulat article type.
2, IDOC created succesfully , then
3, Process the IDOC in BD87 to push the IDOC to PI system .
4, But i could not see the message in PI that too only for one article type.
I'm wondering why this is not getting processed only for one article type and not for others.
we also checked the basic filter for the message type in dist model and even i could not see any condition in PI also,
Is there any thing else i should check? can you please help us on this.
Regards , Sethu.Hi,
Try to reimport the metadata of IDOC into PI in idx2. Also check the port definition in ECC and whether the segment is released or not. Please go through the below discussions it may help you.
EDISDEF: Port XXX segment defn E2EDK35 in IDoc type ORDERS05 CIM type
IDoc 0000000000181226 was saved but cannot or should not be sent
Regards,
Priyanka -
Data of different session are not getting refreshed.
We used select one choice and it is bind to the iterator. Data of different session are not getting reflected.
Problem Scenario : Two browsers are open with same screen . In browser-1, I am adding new item which display on drop down of same screen. But drop down of browser-2 is not displaying the new added value.
Please let me know how to refresh the data of browser-2 if I added data on different session.
//JSFF entry
<af:selectOneChoice binding="#{backingBeanScope.Product.ICTCSTName}"
id="iCTCSTName" simple="true"
label="#{bindings.tpCrudeSuperTypeFindAllPopulatedCT.label}"
required="#{bindings.tpCrudeSuperTypeFindAllPopulatedCT.hints.mandatory}"
value="#{bindings.tpCrudeSuperTypeFindAllPopulatedCT.inputValue}"
autoSubmit="true">
<f:selectItems value="#{bindings.tpCrudeSuperTypeFindAllPopulatedCT.items}"
binding="#{backingBeanScope.Product.si2}"
id="si2"/>
</af:selectOneChoice>
//Pagedef entry
<list IterBinding="tpCrudeSuperTypeFindAllPopulatedCTIterator"
ListOperMode="navigation"
ListIter="tpCrudeSuperTypeFindAllPopulatedCTIterator"
id="tpCrudeSuperTypeFindAllPopulatedCT" DTSupportsMRU="true">
<AttrNames>
<Item Value="superTypeName"/>
</AttrNames>
</list>Are you sure backingBeanScope is the correct scope for your scenario?
Session scope sound more appropriate to me.
binding="#{backingBeanScope.Product.si2}" -
Automatic update of number ranges in FBN1 is not getting processed
Automatic update of number ranges in FBN1 (current status) level is not getting processed.
Tried posting a customer payment document in the system though number ranges are maintained for the year 2015 the number ranges are not overlapped last year all documents are closed but still the numbers are not been picked automatically in FBN1 kindly help in this issueHello Rajesh
Please verify if number ranges are maintained correctly, verify same using transaction OBA7. Also ensure that external assignment is unchecked in FBN1. Share screenshots if possible.
Regards
Aniket -
Savings Plan Contribution is not getting processed in Payroll
Hello Friends,
We are in the process of upgrading our system from 4.0 to 4.7, After correcting the schema as per the release/OSS notes, we are getting Savings Plan Contribution as blank (Retirement Savings).
Cumulation values are coming thru right but current period contribution is missing.
Earlier we had P0169 with P61, now we do not see processing class(PCLS)61 in the PCLS list. Our earlier wage types were referring to PCLS 61, I am not sure if this is causing an issue.
Please let me know if you have any faced similar situation and have an answer.
Thanks & Best Regards
raviRavi,
Appriciate if you could share the solution for your problem in savings plan contribution is not getting processed in the payroll. As I am facing the same kind od problem for my new configured benefit plan ROTH 401k plan.
Please let me know the solution.
Thanks & Regards,
Sunita -
Bulky Message are not getting processed
Hi All,
Recently we have upgraded our XI systems to EHP4.
After upgrade Bulky files are not getting processed into XI system. Small files are getting processed successfully.
Earlier we had faced same issue at that time we have maintained some parameters in transaction RZ10, RZ11, SXMB_ADM-->
Integration Configuration--> HTTP time out parameter.
Same parameters are still there. But now the message is not getting processed in XI when we check into sxi_monitor. Message mapping is also not seems to be a problem as we havnt put any bulky logic over there.
The message is not getting processed ahead of Receiver Grouping . Please find attached log from Performanceheader
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- <!-- Receiver Grouping
-->
- <SAP:PerformanceHeader xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30">
- <SAP:RunTimeItem>
<SAP:Name type="ADAPTER_IN">INTEGRATION_ENGINE_HTTP_ENTRY</SAP:Name>
<SAP:Timestamp type="begin" host="evoxicqab">20091210134229.930472</SAP:Timestamp>
</SAP:RunTimeItem>
- <SAP:RunTimeItem>
<SAP:Name type="ADAPTER_IN">INTEGRATION_ENGINE_HTTP_ENTRY</SAP:Name>
<SAP:Timestamp type="end" host="evoxicqab">20091210134232.052577</SAP:Timestamp>
</SAP:RunTimeItem>
- <SAP:RunTimeItem>
<SAP:Name type="CORE">INTEGRATION_ENGINE</SAP:Name>
<SAP:Timestamp type="begin" host="evoxicqab">20091210134232.059576</SAP:Timestamp>
</SAP:RunTimeItem>
- <SAP:RunTimeItem>
<SAP:Name type="CORE">INTEGRATION_ENGINE</SAP:Name>
<SAP:Timestamp type="end" host="evoxicqab">20091210134232.07151</SAP:Timestamp>
</SAP:RunTimeItem>
- <SAP:RunTimeItem>
<SAP:Name type="DBQUEUE">DB_ENTRY_QUEUING</SAP:Name>
<SAP:Timestamp type="begin" host="evoxicqab">20091210134232.071518</SAP:Timestamp>
</SAP:RunTimeItem>
- <SAP:RunTimeItem>
<SAP:Name type="DBQUEUE">DB_ENTRY_QUEUING</SAP:Name>
<SAP:Timestamp type="end" host="evoxicqab">20091210134237.239947</SAP:Timestamp>
</SAP:RunTimeItem>
- <SAP:RunTimeItem>
<SAP:Name type="PLSRV">PLSRV_RECEIVER_DETERMINATION</SAP:Name>
<SAP:Timestamp type="begin" host="evoxicqab">20091210134237.241179</SAP:Timestamp>
</SAP:RunTimeItem>
- <SAP:RunTimeItem>
<SAP:Name type="PLSRV">PLSRV_RECEIVER_DETERMINATION</SAP:Name>
<SAP:Timestamp type="end" host="evoxicqab">20091210134237.250385</SAP:Timestamp>
</SAP:RunTimeItem>
- <SAP:RunTimeItem>
<SAP:Name type="PLSRV">PLSRV_INTERFACE_DETERMINATION</SAP:Name>
<SAP:Timestamp type="begin" host="evoxicqab">20091210134239.999045</SAP:Timestamp>
</SAP:RunTimeItem>
- <SAP:RunTimeItem>
<SAP:Name type="PLSRV">PLSRV_INTERFACE_DETERMINATION</SAP:Name>
<SAP:Timestamp type="end" host="evoxicqab">20091210134240.001292</SAP:Timestamp>
</SAP:RunTimeItem>
- <SAP:RunTimeItem>
<SAP:Name type="PLSRV">PLSRV_RECEIVER_MESSAGE_SPLIT</SAP:Name>
<SAP:Timestamp type="begin" host="evoxicqab">20091210134240.001413</SAP:Timestamp>
</SAP:RunTimeItem>
- <SAP:RunTimeItem>
<SAP:Name type="PLSRV">PLSRV_RECEIVER_MESSAGE_SPLIT</SAP:Name>
<SAP:Timestamp type="end" host="evoxicqab">20091210134240.026156</SAP:Timestamp>
</SAP:RunTimeItem>
- <SAP:RunTimeItem>
<SAP:Name type="DBQUEUE">DB_SPLITTER_QUEUING</SAP:Name>
<SAP:Timestamp type="begin" host="evoxicqab">20091210134240.026164</SAP:Timestamp>
</SAP:RunTimeItem>
</SAP:PerformanceHeader>Hi
Have you checked this thread, same discussion here
Performance of XI Interfaces
Also check this blog
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2006/06/08/xi-timeouts-timeouts-timeouts
Regards
Ramesh -
I have an Non recurrening Multiple Entries allowed element to an assignment which is not getting processed when i run payroll.
Please help
ThanksThis is to ensure that results generated by the future payroll runs are correct. Lets take a simple eg.
You have a pension element which would be 10% of Gross Pay_YTD.
Run Payroll for Jan (Gross Pay) = 1000 -> Pension = 100 (10% of 1000).
Run Payroll for Mar (Gross Pay) = 1000 -> Pension = 200 (10% of 2000).
Run Payroll for Feb (Gross Pay) = 1000 -> Pension = 200 (10% of 2000 as _YTD of Feb does not account March figures).
In the above case the Payroll Run results generated by March would be incorrect.
So once you run Payroll for March, you can not run payroll for Feb. If you require any additional payments to be made in Feb (after Payroll for Feb and March are processed), you can run Retropay to bring forward the entries to next Open pay period. -
The session could not be processed in lsmw
Hi Experts,
I am uploading data using lsmw following direct input method.But in this i got an error when processing the session.It shows the status message like 'the required session could not be processed'.It also read and convert the input data file successfully.
Can anyone pl help me what the mistake i have done.
Thanks in advance!!!Adobe Lightroom - Find moved or missing files and folders
-
IDOCS Error - Not getting processed automatically
Hi All,
We are loading hierarchy for a Product from R/3 system using the standard datasource.
When we execute the info package, IDOCs are not getting processed automatically.
We are facing the below error message.
Error when updating Idocs in Business Information Warehouse
Diagnosis
Errors have been reported in Business Information Warehouse during IDoc update:
No status record was passed to ALE by the applicat
System Response
Some IDocs have error status.
Procedure
Check the IDocs in Business Information Warehouse . You do this using the extraction monitor.
Error handling:
How you resolve the errors depends on the error message you get.
But when we goto BD87 and process the IDOCs manually, these are getting posted and the hierarchy is loading.
Can someone please guide me on what is the issue with the IDOCs and how to make them to post automatically.
Thanks in Advance
Regards,
SachinHi,
This will happen due to Non-updated IDOCu2019s in the Source system i.e., occurs whenever LUWu2019s are not transferred from the source system to the destination system. If you look at RSMO of the status tab, the error message would appear like u201CtRFC Error in Source Systemu201D or u201CtRFC Error in Data Warehouseu201D or simply u201CtRFC Erroru201D depending on the system from where data is being extracted. Sometimes IDOC are also stuck on R/3 side as there were no processors available to process them. The solution for this Execute LUWu2019s manually. Go to the menu Environment -> Transact. RFC -> In the Source System from RSMO which will asks to login into the source system. The u201CStatus Textu201D for stucked LUWu2019s may be Transaction Recorded or Transaction waiting. Once you encounter this type of status Execute LUWu2019s manually using u201CF6u201D or Editexecute LUWu2019s(F6).Just keep on refreshing until you get the status u201CTransaction is executingu201D in the Production system. We can even see the stuck IDOCu2019c in Transaction BD87 also.Now the data will be pulled into the BW.
Hope it helps a lot.
Thanks and Regards,
Kamesham -
Data packet not getting processed
Hi SDN's
I m loading data from one ODS to 4 regions , the source ODS is successfully loaded from der to the data targets the load is getting failed or taking loang time .
upto transfer rules the data is successful, in update rules data packets are not getting processed
kindly suggest solution, points will be assigned
thx in advanceHi Katam,
In the target ODSs go to the monitor screen for a particular request -> in the menu bar go to environment -> transactRFC-> in the datawarehouse -> give the ID and date -> execute.
Check if there are entries in that. Usually this queue will be stuck and you need to execute the LUWs in the queue manually.
if it says transaction recorded u need to execute it manually
Please revert if any issues
Edited by: Pramod Manjunath on Dec 19, 2007 4:48 PM -
RSEOUT00 - Idoc not getting processed
Hi All,
I have few idocs in prod.system with status 30 and they are not getting processed using RSEOUT00.
I tried using back ground job / forgrond / BD87 also but they are not getting converted to 03 status.
receiver port is xmlgen.
Any thing like idoc lock ? or something other that is preventing it process ?
Please let me know if anything.check out the multiple threads in SDN regarding this issue
idoc remains random in status 30
some of the common pointers looks to be locked IDOC (check in SM12), SM58 to see if anything is in the RFC queue (though I doubt that would be the case)..
How are you generating your idoc? standard FM or MASTER_IDOC_DISTRIBUTE? -
Session is not getting invalidated when i access more then 1 war applications
I am experiencing the following problem and i do not understand
the reason. I have an application (3 jsps) in a directory
called /private under weblogic 6 sp1
directory "DefaultWebApp_myserver". The login.jsp, logout.jsp
and logError.jsp exist in directory "DefaultWebApp_myserver"
below is the web.xml deployed with the default web application
----------------------------------------- web.xml ----
<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<!DOCTYPE web-app PUBLIC "-//Sun Microsystems, Inc.//DTD Web Application 1.2//EN"
"http://java.sun.com/j2ee/dtds/web-app_2_2.dtd">
<web-app>
<welcome-file-list>
<welcome-file>/private/checkCredentials.jsp</welcome-file>
</welcome-file-list>
<security-constraint>
<web-resource-collection>
<web-resource-name> MySecureBit0 </web-resource-name>
<description>no description </description>
<url-pattern>/private/*</url-pattern>
<http-method>GET</http-method>
<http-method>POST</http-method>
</web-resource-collection>
<auth-constraint>
<role-name>NBAD_DOMAIN</role-name>
</auth-constraint>
</security-constraint>
<login-config>
<auth-method>FORM</auth-method>
<realm-name>MyRDBMS Realm</realm-name>
<form-login-config>
<form-login-page>Login.jsp</form-login-page>
<form-error-page>LoginError.jsp</form-error-page>
</form-login-config>
</login-config>
</web-app>
I have another application war. This application consist of
2 jsp files. Below is the web.xml
------------------------ end web.xml -----------------------
<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<!DOCTYPE web-app PUBLIC "-//Sun Microsystems, Inc.//DTD Web Application 1.2//EN"
"http://java.sun.com/j2ee/dtds/web-app_2_2.dtd">
<web-app>
<welcome-file-list>
<welcome-file>/private/checkCredentials.jsp</welcome-file>
</welcome-file-list>
<security-constraint>
<web-resource-collection>
<web-resource-name> MySecureBit0 </web-resource-name>
<description>no description </description>
<url-pattern>/*</url-pattern>
<http-method>GET</http-method>
<http-method>POST</http-method>
</web-resource-collection>
<auth-constraint>
<role-name>Engineer</role-name>
</auth-constraint>
</security-constraint>
<login-config>
<auth-method>FORM</auth-method>
<realm-name>MyRDBMS Realm</realm-name>
<form-login-config>
<form-login-page>../Login.jsp</form-login-page>
<form-error-page>../LoginError.jsp</form-error-page>
</form-login-config>
</login-config>
</web-app>
------------------------------ end web.xml ----------------------
Now i login in the default application that i have i link that takes me to the
second app (the war); then i go to the default
app and i logout. When i logout i invalidate the session. but it
seems that the session is not getting invalided because i can
enter the default
application and the war test application without login in.
If i do not access the test war application from the default application the session
is invalidate and i get the login page.
I hope i am clear.
Thanks
Ibrahim
I asked a similar question some time ago and the answer that I got was that each
application (war file) has its own session object. You cannot transfer information
from one application to another via the session id.
Vladimir
"ibrahim" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>I am experiencing the following problem and i do not understand
>the reason. I have an application (3 jsps) in a directory
>called /private under weblogic 6 sp1
>directory "DefaultWebApp_myserver". The login.jsp, logout.jsp
>and logError.jsp exist in directory "DefaultWebApp_myserver"
>below is the web.xml deployed with the default web application
>----------------------------------------- web.xml ----
><?xml version="1.0" ?>
><!DOCTYPE web-app PUBLIC "-//Sun Microsystems, Inc.//DTD Web Application
>1.2//EN"
>"http://java.sun.com/j2ee/dtds/web-app_2_2.dtd">
><web-app>
><welcome-file-list>
> <welcome-file>/private/checkCredentials.jsp</welcome-file>
></welcome-file-list>
><security-constraint>
> <web-resource-collection>
> <web-resource-name> MySecureBit0 </web-resource-name>
> <description>no description </description>
> <url-pattern>/private/*</url-pattern>
> <http-method>GET</http-method>
> <http-method>POST</http-method>
> </web-resource-collection>
> <auth-constraint>
> <role-name>NBAD_DOMAIN</role-name>
> </auth-constraint>
></security-constraint>
><login-config>
> <auth-method>FORM</auth-method>
> <realm-name>MyRDBMS Realm</realm-name>
> <form-login-config>
> <form-login-page>Login.jsp</form-login-page>
> <form-error-page>LoginError.jsp</form-error-page>
> </form-login-config>
></login-config>
></web-app>
>---------------------------------------------------------
>I have another application war. This application consist of
>2 jsp files. Below is the web.xml
>------------------------ end web.xml -----------------------
>
><?xml version="1.0" ?>
><!DOCTYPE web-app PUBLIC "-//Sun Microsystems, Inc.//DTD Web Application
>1.2//EN"
>"http://java.sun.com/j2ee/dtds/web-app_2_2.dtd">
><web-app>
><welcome-file-list>
><welcome-file>/private/checkCredentials.jsp</welcome-file>
></welcome-file-list>
><security-constraint>
> <web-resource-collection>
> <web-resource-name> MySecureBit0 </web-resource-name>
> <description>no description </description>
> <url-pattern>/*</url-pattern>
> <http-method>GET</http-method>
> <http-method>POST</http-method>
> </web-resource-collection>
> <auth-constraint>
> <role-name>Engineer</role-name>
> </auth-constraint>
></security-constraint>
><login-config>
> <auth-method>FORM</auth-method>
> <realm-name>MyRDBMS Realm</realm-name>
> <form-login-config>
> <form-login-page>../Login.jsp</form-login-page>
> <form-error-page>../LoginError.jsp</form-error-page>
> </form-login-config>
></login-config>
></web-app>
>------------------------------ end web.xml ----------------------
>Now i login in the default application that i have i link that takes
>me to the
>second app (the war); then i go to the default
>app and i logout. When i logout i invalidate the session. but it
> seems that the session is not getting invalided because i can
>enter the default
>
>application and the war test application without login in.
>If i do not access the test war application from the default application
>the session
>is invalidate and i get the login page.
>I hope i am clear.
>Thanks
>Ibrahim
>
-
Automatic Mail not getting generated through background job
Hi Experts,
We have set up a job variant with spool recipients. We are getting the automatic mail if the job is getting finished successfully. But we are not getting the automatic mail if the job is in cancelled status. Earlier we used to get the mail even if the job is in cancelled status. We are not sure if there is any setting which would restrict the automatic mail based on the job status.
Appreciate your help in this regard.
Thanks and Regards,
Ranjani.Hi,
Just for a work around, try checking the SAP user inbox for the user who has scheduled the background job.
I don't there is any seperate configuration in Spool List Recipient for the canceled jobs. We need to confirm that the email ids provided in the Spool List recipient are correct and the background job creates a spool request even if it is canceled.
Also if possible try deleting the existing background job and create a new background job with the same parameters and valid email id's maintained in the Spool List recipient.
OR
Without deleting the existing background job, parallely create a new background job with the same parameters and valid email id's maintained in the Spool List recipient. If it works then delete the old background job.
Thanks
Harish
Maybe you are looking for
-
I have a flash 8, as 2.0 site that loads swfs into a content movie clip. Everything works fine except for my photo gallery. The swf does not fully load on the first click. But if you click the gallery button a second time, it all loads. Also, once in
-
I have a piece of code that copies data from one byte buffer to another for continuous 20 bytes. However after the loop the destination buffer is still empty. ByteBuffer respBuffer = ByteBuffer.allocate(20, false); respBuffer.order(ByteOrder.LITTLE_E
-
Fileter value not displaying in web
Hi all, I have a issue with selecting the filter value for a unit. The problem is I can find the value when I run the query in BEx, but same value is not displaying in webreport. Can anyone tell me, what might be the problem. (Actually I have to filt
-
I have a playlist without about 50 songs. Obviously they can't fit on one audio cd. So iTunes says that it would make multiple audio cds. I choose yes, and it appears that it burns all of the songs but when I check the CDs it has only burned some of
-
FindPanel Failure (trying again)
I'm reposting this cause I'm dead in the water. An application without a Find isn't very usable. Anyone have any ideas on how I can 'fix' this. I've looked at the underlaying code to see if I rewrite the stuff, but it's a twisty maze of little passag