SM58 - Entries against workflow_local_100

Hi,
    I have an ongoing issue with error entries in SM58. There are around 25 entries in error and hereby terminating events are not delivered to the steps that are waiting.
Earlier I used to manually execute each of these because I used once in a blue moon. Now this issue (having entries in SM58) is more often, I need to investigate and do a permanent fix.
I understand that the unavailability if sufficient dialog processes coud be one issue.
I need to understand what could be other issues for tRFC for not getting executed.
What other options I have (line activating event queue etc)
Thanks,
AKJ

There are two options.
1> Schedule report - RSARFCEX t orun every hour. Use a variant which has correct workflow RFC destination. In my case it is workfow_local_100. This is similar to doing Execute LUWs in Sm58
2> Write a report to pull items from ARFCSSTATE and schedule report- RSARFCSE in background.
         TID is built from concatenating columns   ARFCIPID, ARFCPID, ARFCTIME, ARFCTIDCNT of table ARFCSSTATE.
         Make Forced as 'X'
Closing this thread

Similar Messages

  • Accounting entry against Excise invoice not created  for Service Tax sales

    Dear all,
        I am facing one problem related to accounting entry against excise invoice not created, for service tax sales scenario in SEZ plant.
    Accounting entry against billing document is generated,which contains revenue account-Debit entry,service tax 10% --Debit entry,ECS-Service tax 2% --Debit entry, SECess Service Tax 1% --Debit entry & Sundry Debtors (Reco)  - Domestic(Customer receivable reconciallation) account-Credit entry.
      But after generating excise invoice, accouning entries not generated for clearing of Cenvat suspense entry(i.e.service tax 10% ,ECS-Service tax 2% , SECess Service Tax 1%) which is generated during billing document.
    Plz. suggest step by step guideline to resolve this issue.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Mukesh Pardeshi

    Hi ReazuddinMD,
    thanks for your reply and support...I checked all the entries/accounts maintained correct.. but the Accounting entrys against Excise invoice not created..
    Now i am geeting error as below at the time of saving Excise invoice,
    No account is specified in item 0000000001
    Message no. F5670
    Diagnosis
    No account was specified for account type "S" in item "0000000001" of the FI/CO document.
    System Response
    The Financial Accounting program cannot process the document.
    Procedure
    A system error has probably occurred in the application you called up. Check the data transferred to item "0000000001" of the FI/CO document.

  • How to stop this multiple entry against same condition type in pricing

    My client is using manual condition type for the basic price "ZBPR". Now system allowing multiple entry against this condition type in the pricing screen during order creation i.e in the first line if we put ZBPR 00 , in the second line system allowing to put another value against same ZBPR say for example 2000 & doing all subsequent calculations on the basis of 3000 .which is not at all acceptable by my client .Please suggest how to stop this multiple entry against same condition type

    You have to make the condition type as Mandatory and not manual.
    If you are entering many condition records of the ZPR0 then the latest entry will be taken for further processing for subtotal rebate and total price.
    For all the other entered condition records will have yellow traffic signal which is not active.
    you can assign a routine with the help pf your abaper...
    In the Transaction VOFM  define a requirement such that
    you condition type takes value only one at the time of order entry.
    regards,
    Amlan Sarkar

  • Invoice & Service entry against PO

    Hi All,
    I need BAPIs for creation of invoice against purchase order and creation of service entry against purchase order. Please let me know at the earliest.
    Regards,
    Lad.

    See example of creating service entry sheet....
    http://anu-sapdiary.blogspot.com/2007/10/using-bapi-bapientrysheetcreate-to.html
    http://abapeasy.blogspot.com/2008/02/bapientrysheetcreate.html

  • BAPI to add more Parameter entries against a user id

    Hi All
    I am looking for a BAPI that assign parameter entries against a user id (tab 'parameter' if use tran SU01 for a user id) - the one that i am looking is similar to the 'BAPI_USER_ACTGROUPS_ASSIGN' which assign roles against a user id.
    I have looked in SDN for anything that may listed under PARAM but what I found are not related - If you have any ideas - please post me a line - Thanks

    Hi,
    Search with BAPI_USER_*
    and see if BAPI_USER_PROFILES_ASSIGN or BAPI_USER_CHANGE can help.
    Regards,
    Atish

  • Distribute new entries against existing reference data, Integrated Planning

    Dear Experts,
    Within IP, I struggle with how to distribute new entries against existing reference data.
    Example:
    Reference data:
    Product   /   Customer   /   amount
    P1               C1                  100
    P1               C2                  150
    P2               C2                  120
    P2               C3                  100
    New data:(data entered on product level, therefore not assigd to customer yet)
    P3          #                    150
    How can I distribute product P3 to Customers with reference to the data on product P1 ?
    Many thanks,
    Erik Pos
    Edited by: Erik Pos on Jan 5, 2010 3:52 PM
    Edited by: Erik Pos on Jan 5, 2010 3:54 PM

    Hi Hyma,
    This documentation indeed indicates that you can use other characteristic values in the parameter group to be used for reference, good news !, but this is based on SAP-BPS ?
    The SAP-BW IP documentationn does not include this information can you confirm this solution works for Integrated Planning using the conditions within the function distribute with reference data ?
    Many thanks,
    Erik Pos

  • Element entry against the employee and company

    How do u check element entry against the employee and company? Don't we have to use Benefits tables. And what tables are we supposed to use.
    Many Thanks

    I got my phone in october, faxed in paystub at the same time. The store told me 1-2 billing cycles. When the first bill came it wasnt on there, I went into another verizon store and they told me its faster to bring them the paystub so they can take a picture of it and "instantly" get it in the system. Then the next bill came and it still hadn't been fixed so we called and then they gave us some "ticket number" and told me it should be on the next bill. This months bill is here and and its STILL not there.  This is ridiculous. customer service is TERRIBLE!  There is only one number for customer support and they are helpless.

  • Service entry against expired outline agreement

    Hi Everyone,
    Is it possible to raise a service entry sheet against an expired outline agreement?
    Thanks in advance for your responses.

    If you can see the validity end date is over in purchase order.
    Then you might have face the message SE242 - Runtime of entry must fall within runtime of purchase order (& - &).
    But you can continue by configuring this message as warning.
    In short, yes, you can create Service entry sheet with regards to this purchase order, which has created with regards to contract and the contract is expired..

  • Work Flow EVENT - SM58 Entries are not executing automatically

    Hi Experts,
    I have used the standard BOR2034 for creating PO after saving the contract.
    I have developed an RFC enabled FM refering to the Standard FM SWW_WI_CREATE_VIA_EVENT.
    Inside the custom FM I am calling the BAPI_PO_CREATE1 for creating PO.
    After creating a contract using VA41 I am able to see in Event trace that my Event with corresponding custom FM is triggering.
    and the two entries are created in SM58 - Transactional RFC one is my Custom FM name and another is SWF_EVT_HANDLER_START_INTERNAL.
    When I execute the LUW by selecting execution, PO is getting created. Where as this entries are not picking automatically.
    I want to know, whether I have missed any step in process or do we need to schedule any job for automatically clearing the SM58 queue entries.
    Please help me in resolving the issue.
    Responses are highly appreciated..
    Warm Regards...

    Hi Natasha,
    As you say that you see the below entries in TRFC monitor, you need have a commit work after the below FMs are called(just one will do),
    the two entries are created in SM58 - Transactional RFC one is my Custom FM name and another is SWF_EVT_HANDLER_START_INTERNAL.
    How and from where are the above FMs called?
    Regards,
    Chen

  • SM58 entries processed very slow

    Hi Gurus,
    currently we are facing problems with TRFC queue entries, during sometimes all entries are struck up in the queue and processed very slowly. For that we have scheduled a TRFCs processing job, but still entries are getting process very slow.
    if any one of come across the similar issue, please provide your inputs.
    Thanks and Regards,
    venkat.

    A SAP notes search with keywords SM58 and performance could give you a start.
    For example:
    Note 375566 - Large number of entries in tRFC and qRFC tables
    Note 460235 - tRFC/qRFC: Low-speed processing

  • -ve time, time recording sys, working hrs entry against prj, PO, SO

    Hi Goodmorning,
    Looking for help please -
    We are using -ve time management.  Time data comes from time recording system and through CATS emp books time against network, service order, production order.
    Whered does employee swipe data gets recorded in employee master.
    Will there be any chance of double entry time?
    Please help me.
    Regards,
    RS

    Hi Latha
    The time data from the system is stored in CATSDB if the time data is entered in CATS.
    This transfer of data can be through LSMW or BDC upload.
    There will not be any duplication of data in CATS.
    Ravee
    99206.33669

  • Restart SM58 entries with RSARFCEX

    Hello!
    In IDoc scenarios we often have messages stuck in SM58 on XI if the receiving system cannot be reached due to temporary errors like network problems or unavailability.
    According to SAP Help the program RSARFCEX restarts unsuccessful tRFC calls so I have scheduled it it as a job. The job is running successfully but it never restarts entries with temporary errors from SM58. When I try manually using SM58 -> Execute LUW the message goes through. Any ideas what I might have configured wrong?
    Regards, Tanja

    Hi Tanja,
      Just give a try to reschedule the job in the background.
      First delete the released jobs and try scheduling it freshly...
      Just confirm the steps once again:
       1) Go to s38 and give the program name
       2) click on the program in the tool menu
       3) Then execute --> Background --> schedule --> schedule periodically
    Give the details about how periodically u want to execute the program.
    Thanks,
    Prasanthi.

  • For all entries against Ranges

    Hi,
    I have a question regarding a Select query where I have to select some data and then store it in table and refer it for the 2nd Select.
    eg: Select from table 1
          into itab1.
        select from table 2
       into itab2
       for all entries in itab1.
    My question is should I use a Range for the 1st select instead of an itab.The itab1 will be containing max 50 records.
    The problem with for all entries is that I cannot use 'UP TO ROWS' as it only deletes extra entries at application level and not database level. I will be selecting 1000 rows even if I want only 100 rows.
    Please let me know ur views

    From a performance perspective ranges perform better than FOR ALL ENTRIES however the number of records you can use in your range is limited. You will get a run time dump if your range size increases beyond the allowable. If you are very confident that you have not more than 50 entries in your range, I would recommend that you use the range instead of FOR ALL ENTRIES.
    An even better option would be to use a join of two tables. If you can provide specifics I could help you further.

  • SM58 Error entries

    Hi All,
    I find many SM58 entries logged against the program RSM13000 with message 'User is locked. Please notify the person responsible' .
    For the FMs 'SWW_WI_CREATE_VIA_EVENT' and  'SWW_WI_CREATE_VIA_EVENT_IBF'
    the Workflow_local_100 destination is maintianed.
    Request you to advice what needs to be checked to stop such errors.
    *similarly against the program RSWWDHEX with message 'R/3 logon failed' for function module 'SWW_WI_STATUS_SET_READY'.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi Vijay,
    All the problems sound in relation with the user <i><b>WF-BATCH</b></i>, which system automatically creates as you do the workflow customization with the transaction <i><b>SWU3</b></i>.
    So first of all verify the creation of this user by consulting the workflow administrator. Also, find the following weblog link written by me, which will talk more about the SWU3 settings -
    /people/sapna.modi/blog/2007/02/19/workflows-for-dummies--introductionpart-i
    Secondly, for lock issue, first try to delete manually the WF-BATCH lock entries from SM12 transaction and see whether the problem is resolved or not forever.
    If it doesn't happen, then you might have to delete the WF-BATCH entry programmatically from SM12 for the given workflow key. Kindly find the following code for this -
    * Logic for Deletion of WF Lock for User 'WF-Batch'                    *
    CALL FUNCTION 'ENQUE_READ'
      EXPORTING
        GCLIENT = SY-MANDT
        GNAME   = ' '
        GARG    = ' '
        GUNAME  = 'WF-BATCH'
      TABLES
        ENQ     = LT_LOCK_LIST.
    * Key for the BOR object
      LV_INSTID = ZBOR_KEY.
      SELECT * FROM SWW_WI2OBJ
        INTO TABLE LT_WF_LOCK_ID
        WHERE INSTID = LV_INSTID.
      SORT LT_WF_LOCK_ID BY CREA_TMP DESCENDING.
    * Read the internal table for the Workflow Task
      READ TABLE LT_WF_LOCK_ID
          WITH KEY WI_RH_TASK = 'ZTASK_ID'
          INTO LS_WF_LOCK_ID.
      CONCATENATE SY-MANDT LS_WF_LOCK_ID-TOP_WI_ID INTO LV_LOCK_ARG.
      READ TABLE LT_LOCK_LIST WITH KEY GARG = LV_LOCK_ARG INTO LS_LOCK_LIST.
      IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
        MOVE LS_LOCK_LIST TO LS_LOCK_DEL.
        APPEND LS_LOCK_DEL TO LT_LOCK_DEL .
    *   Delete the log entry for WF-BATCH for the given workflow
        CALL FUNCTION 'ENQUE_DELETE'
          EXPORTING
            CHECK_UPD_REQUESTS    = 1
            SUPPRESS_SYSLOG_ENTRY = ' '
          TABLES
            ENQ                   = LT_LOCK_DEL.
      ENDIF.
    * End of  Logic for Deletion of WF Lock for User 'WF-Batch'
    Hope this helps you.
    PS If the answer solves your query, plz close the thread by marking it Solved and rewarding each reply.
    Regards<b></b><i></i>
    Message was edited by:
            Sapna Modi

  • Financial entry problem against Employee

    In Tally My Client enter Follwing type of entry
    Expense entry against Employee
    he give emplyee 2000 for expenses
    after that afetr that he give bifurgation for that 2000
    & after that they adjust the entry against that 2000 & entry shows as
    Expens on Employee A/C Dbt by 2000
    aginst
    Travling 1200
    octroi    300
    other expese 500
    So what is the way to punch this type of entry in SAP B1

    Hi,
    Have you tried having a Petty Cash G\L acccount where the cash is first disbursed to the employee for the expenses and then when the expenses bill are available, then creating a new JE to book them by reducing the balance in the Petty Cash account.
    Check it.
    Kind Regards,
    Jitin
    SAP Business One Forum Team

Maybe you are looking for