SM58 Error

Hi, I'm gettting the following status text "Error in target system" in SM58 from the function module IDOC_INBOUND_ASYNCHRONOUS. I have not encountered this type of error in the past can anyone let me know what coule be the possible reason.

Hi,
May be u can do is
sm58--> select the line > select menu EDIT> execute LUW
after this also you are getting this error . please contact basis .
This error may be due to target system is down.
aRs

Similar Messages

  • JDBC - XI - IDOC scenario, SM58 error

    I am trying to set up a scenario with JDBC -> XI-> IDOC.  I seem to get the data, but when I look at it in SXMB_MONI, I get the checkered flag, for the overall status, but a red flag for the outbound status.  This led me to SM58 where I see this error "No authorization to send IDocs with message type Z...".  It shows the caller ID as being XIAFUSER (which is different from the ID I have created on the receiving SAP system) and is in function module IDOC_INBOUND_ASYNCHRONOUS.   On XI, I have the RFC (SM59) and Port (IDX1) setup for the receiving SAP system.  The receiving system has an ID setup (used in the RFC on XI), has a partner profile, port, logical system, and a RFC to XI setup.
    Any ideas on where to track this down?  I tried giving XIAFUSER sap_all, and it still fails and this ID does not exist on the receiving system.

    HI,
    Just to inform you that, if any SM58 error, mainly because of IDX1 entry and RFC destination .
    So that;s the reason , i just suggested to check this SAP note.
    Now you have given SAP_ALL access to test right ? Even you can check with this SAP note-837595
    Also check that SM59 (RFC destination) in XI system uses any User ID ? DO not select CURRENT USER option here.. and check it
    Regards,
    Moorthy

  • Inbound Function Module SM58 Error in Outbound R3- XI- file Scenario

    I am getting an SM58 error message of "Use IDOC Adapter for FM IDOC_INBOUND_ASYNCHRONOUS...." in my R3 system when trying to implement an Outbound R3->XI->file Scenario.  This implies that the system thinks I am doing inbound when I am really doing an outbound IDoc to XI. I followed the guides and seem to have everything set up properly.
    I also found a closed posting concerning the same error message, but there was no resolution.
    My idoc also appears fine (outbound, right ports). To test, I changed my XI rfcDestination to an EDI System rfcDestination and the ORDRSP outbound idoc goes to the edi system as expected.
    Any idea why my R3 system thinks I am using IDOC_INBOUND_ASYNCHRONOUS?
    Thanks in advance!

    Hi,
    I have couple questions before exactly answering your question
    What type of data you are trying to send like
    1. Master data (Customer master, Vendor master)
    2. Transactional data (Sales orders, Purchase orders)
    If you are trying to send transactional data then check the partner profile configuration for whom you are trying to create outbound IDocs. Select your partners outbound message type and go to Message Control details tab and check your Process code and corresponding functional module if the function module used is ment for creating outbound Idocs then there should be some other that is causing the problem otherwise I guess this is the problem so you can change the associated process code function module.
    Jagadish.

  • SM58 Error Message

    Hi,
    Does anybody know the resolution for the following
    In SM58 status text showing "Select one of the install language" and it has failed ?
    Any thoughts ?
    Please let me know if you need more information
    Thanks

    Hey,
    SM58 errors occur due to RFC destination, Check SM59 what lang you have chosen (Logon & security- Tab ).
    Cheers
    Agasthuri

  • SM58 Errors due to Work Item/Task

    Hello,
    we are getting a lot of sm58 error messages related to a workflow task TS00007989 (Error during outbound processing).
    All the errors carry the same message "Work item 000000549001: Task TS00007989 locked for  instantiation"
    What could be the root cause of this issue? Is it possible to resolve this without deactivating the standard workflow task.

    Hi Mohan,
      Its RFC error. Please check the workflow instance using T-code SWI2_DIAG to get details about this error. Also you can contact your BASIS Team for the same to check the connectivity of the system for which these IDOCS get triggered.
    Also check the T-Code WE02 to get details about error in IDOC.
    BR,
    Prakash

  • SM58 Error For IDOC to IDOC Scenario

    Folks,
    I am getting an error in SM58 from Sender system ( IDOC-XI-IDOC Scenario ) <u><b>IDoc adapter inbound channel: Error Error when reading</b></u>. The Issue is XI is not receiving any IDOCS. Does anybody know what is the problem
    Thanks
    Manish

    Hi Renjith,
    I'm facing the same problem the flow is basically form BW to BO.
    When they load the data at sender side the idocs are stucked with error status 2:
    "Could not find code page for receiving system" in transaction BD87.
    Also when I reprocess it is successful. But its is getting stucked in SM58 with errors like:
    1)Error in RFC connnection
    2)ERROR REQU_D38IW3WD0XGK1DA48DM96N12J PG# 8 in BW
    When I execute it throes an error saying "Function Module does not existsor EXCEPTION raised".
    Also are many queues stucked in SMQ1 Outbound.
    Please help. Many Thanks.

  • No service for system sap*** client *** , sm58 error

    Hi Friends
    When I am trying to send message from My Xi system to R/3 system I am getting error.,
    No service for system SAPSXD, client 001 in Integration Directory
    I had searched it on sdn n found that this is very common error.
    I had gone through block,
    The specified item was not found.
    But then also not able to solve this error.
    I m giving the config of my sys here,
    I had created,logical system in my R/3 system for Xi system as SXD001 , and logical system for R/3 system is SND111.
    and same thing I had maintained in Xi system also.
    Now when i m trying to send message from Xi to R/3 I am gettin error in SM58 ,
    No service for system SAPSXD, client 001 in Integration Directory.
    I had checked note 940313 , that is for this same error, but the solution given in that is for when we get error while sending idoc from R/3 to XI but in my case I am getting same error while sending Idoc from XI to R/3.
    I had creted 2 business system one as third party and one for my r/3 system.
    where should i assign the logical system? and which logical system should i assign?that of XI system??
    I had searched SDN lot but didnt got any scenario like this.
    So please let me know..how to solve this problem.

    Hi Udo,
    I had created a technical system as third party system for our partner. and technical system as web as abap for my R/3 system. In the third party system I had assigned a business system and a logical system as BAS01, and to my R/3 system I had assigned a business system and logycal system as SND111.
    SXD is my system ID for XI.
    In Id i had configured the whole scenario by creating importing this two business system under service withour party. and I am configuring under that. So how should i configure sender system here.
    do i need to change some configuration on R/3 side? On r/3 side,in distribution model, i had defined the logical system name of PI as sender.Do i need to create the third party system here and specify its name in 'from' indistribution model?
    This is my first scenario in XI so gettings lots of problem. I really appritiate ur help.
    Thanks.

  • Transfer of IDOC from R/3 to XI - SM58 error

    Hi
    i am working on scenario where the output of the delivery created in R/3 is a idoc to be sent to XI.
      When i create a delivery of type LO(without reference to Sales order) the IDOC gets passed on to XI successfully
      But when i create a delivery of type LF (with reference to Sales order) the IDOC gets stuck in SM 58 in R/3.
    I dont know why this is happening.
    when i check the sm58 it shows the following in Status text:
    <b>EDISDEF: Port SAPEC1 segment defn E2EDL43 in IDoc type DELVRY05 CIM type</b> where SAPEC1 is the port which i have defined in XI for R/3 DELVRY05 is IDOC type.
    please help me understand this error
    Thanks and regards,
    Amit Deshpande

    Hi,
       I tried doing as per your suggestions
    I deleted the DELVRY05 in IDX2 and tried to execute the process as suggested by Renjith but same error continues.
    I checked as per Sreeram's view this segment E2EDL43  which is not there. but when i checked the we60 in R/3 this segment is of type E1EDL43 which is there in DELVRY05.
    Do u have any further observations?
    thanks and regards,
    Amit Deshpande

  • Outbound Idoc 03 status - SM58 error

    Hi ,
    For Oubound Idoc, I am getting Idoc with status 03 but is not there in Receipient system.
    When I check Idoc in Sm58, Idoc has error <b>"The ABAP/4 Open SQL array insert results in duplicate database records".</b>
    Can anybody help me how to solve this issue?
    Thanks & regards,
    Yogita

    use FM idoc_status_write_to_database to change the IDoc status from 03 to 30 and then  run WE14 or  RSEOUT00 to change the status back to 03
    resending idoc from status 03 ...is a data duplicatino issue on receiving side...why do u need to do that ?
    Use WE19 tcode to debug
    In we19
    1)U can choose your Idoc number in existing Idoc textbox
    2)Press execute
    3)u will display ur Idoc struct
    4)Dbl click on any field then u can modify its content
    5)PressStd Outbound Processing Btn to process modified Idoc
    Thats it

  • SM58 errors in production

    Hi XI gurus,
    am getting errors in SM58 saying that,Time limit exceed
    Here the details,
    Caller : HTTP user
    Func.module : Idoc inbound async.
    Target sys : R/3
    status text : Time limit exceed
    same for the another issue
    Caller : HTTP user
    Func.module : Idoc inbound async.
    Target sys : R/3
    status text : 00000000000000000000 0
    kind regards,
    Y.Raj.

    Can you execute the entires in SM58 by hitting "F6"?
    Seems like the R/3 system is busy and cannot process the messages coming from XI. May check the R/3 system..

  • SM58 error : No links passed which could be entered

    Hi all,
    We are trying to sets archivelink for billing docs. On the SM58 log, we get the following error u2013
    [username] ARCHIV_CREATE_TABLE           SAP_AL_OUT    2010.08.11 09:07:09 No links passed which could be entered
    Does anyone what this error means?

    Hello,
    You can look into the assignment field of Check (bank) sub-account (payable) FBL3N.
    You can again run and update in reference field also. I will be updated in both the fields. There is no reversal for this program. Meaning that if you have erronously filled in assignment field, it cannot be reversed, other than mass change of documents in FBL3N.
    Regards,
    Ravi

  • SM58 error: EDI: Table passed to EDI_SEGMENTS_ADD_BLOCK is empty

    Hi All,
    In SM58, we see the below error. If we open the detailed error message, its acutally for a aleaud idoc to be sent to a R/3 system. But we have disabled ALEAUD idocs for that r/3 system.
    Any suggestions on how to resolve the issue?
    Regards,
    Aarthi

    Hi Aarti,
    The error only occurs if all segments are deleted in the version
    change in the ALE outbound processing. The cause can be an incorrect
    filling of the IDocs by customers or an application or an incompatible
    entry for the IDoc type in the partner profile.
    please do the required correction in IDOC.
    Please refer sap note [305375|http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/oss_notes/sdn_oss_bc_mid/~form/handler%7b5f4150503d3030323030363832353030303030303031393732265f4556454e543d444953504c4159265f4e4e554d3d333035333735%7d]
    Regards,
    Srinivas

  • SM58 error log

    Hi
      I'm getting some error log in SM58
       RWBUSER    SX_OBJECTS_SEND   28.12.2008 No appropriate entry found in table ADRT
    What could be the reason for this log?
    Regards,
    Deep

    i have checked the note.. 
       1022743 note has the suggestion..
       complete the address information.. what exactly it points.. ? i dont have clear idea on this..
       please give me suggestion.. on this..
    regards,
    deep

  • SM58 Error entries

    Hi All,
    I find many SM58 entries logged against the program RSM13000 with message 'User is locked. Please notify the person responsible' .
    For the FMs 'SWW_WI_CREATE_VIA_EVENT' and  'SWW_WI_CREATE_VIA_EVENT_IBF'
    the Workflow_local_100 destination is maintianed.
    Request you to advice what needs to be checked to stop such errors.
    *similarly against the program RSWWDHEX with message 'R/3 logon failed' for function module 'SWW_WI_STATUS_SET_READY'.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi Vijay,
    All the problems sound in relation with the user <i><b>WF-BATCH</b></i>, which system automatically creates as you do the workflow customization with the transaction <i><b>SWU3</b></i>.
    So first of all verify the creation of this user by consulting the workflow administrator. Also, find the following weblog link written by me, which will talk more about the SWU3 settings -
    /people/sapna.modi/blog/2007/02/19/workflows-for-dummies--introductionpart-i
    Secondly, for lock issue, first try to delete manually the WF-BATCH lock entries from SM12 transaction and see whether the problem is resolved or not forever.
    If it doesn't happen, then you might have to delete the WF-BATCH entry programmatically from SM12 for the given workflow key. Kindly find the following code for this -
    * Logic for Deletion of WF Lock for User 'WF-Batch'                    *
    CALL FUNCTION 'ENQUE_READ'
      EXPORTING
        GCLIENT = SY-MANDT
        GNAME   = ' '
        GARG    = ' '
        GUNAME  = 'WF-BATCH'
      TABLES
        ENQ     = LT_LOCK_LIST.
    * Key for the BOR object
      LV_INSTID = ZBOR_KEY.
      SELECT * FROM SWW_WI2OBJ
        INTO TABLE LT_WF_LOCK_ID
        WHERE INSTID = LV_INSTID.
      SORT LT_WF_LOCK_ID BY CREA_TMP DESCENDING.
    * Read the internal table for the Workflow Task
      READ TABLE LT_WF_LOCK_ID
          WITH KEY WI_RH_TASK = 'ZTASK_ID'
          INTO LS_WF_LOCK_ID.
      CONCATENATE SY-MANDT LS_WF_LOCK_ID-TOP_WI_ID INTO LV_LOCK_ARG.
      READ TABLE LT_LOCK_LIST WITH KEY GARG = LV_LOCK_ARG INTO LS_LOCK_LIST.
      IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
        MOVE LS_LOCK_LIST TO LS_LOCK_DEL.
        APPEND LS_LOCK_DEL TO LT_LOCK_DEL .
    *   Delete the log entry for WF-BATCH for the given workflow
        CALL FUNCTION 'ENQUE_DELETE'
          EXPORTING
            CHECK_UPD_REQUESTS    = 1
            SUPPRESS_SYSLOG_ENTRY = ' '
          TABLES
            ENQ                   = LT_LOCK_DEL.
      ENDIF.
    * End of  Logic for Deletion of WF Lock for User 'WF-Batch'
    Hope this helps you.
    PS If the answer solves your query, plz close the thread by marking it Solved and rewarding each reply.
    Regards<b></b><i></i>
    Message was edited by:
            Sapna Modi

  • SM58 - Error while sending IDOC

    Hi,
    I got the following error while sending the IDoc to a XI system.
    "No service for system (Idoc adapter port), client 800 in Integration Directory"
    Please let me know whether this is due to an error in network or  application error.
    Note: remote logon is not successful in the XI system
    Thanks in advance
    Edited by: RPN on Jul 1, 2008 11:46 AM

    Hi RPN,
    Plz do check the  following things :
    1. Verify the logical business system in SLD.
    To verify --- Go to SLD home page ---> Technical Landscape --> Select Web AS ABAP --> Select the technical system --> Clients ---> Click on the client you used as Business system --> Here look for the logical system is defined or not.
    2. Open ID---> Click on Objects --> Service Without party/Party > Double click on business system>On the tright side--> Service --> Adapter specific Identifiers ---> Check IDoc Adpater, Logical System.
    3. Refresh the full CPA Cache (userid must be XIDIRUSER/PIDIRUSER)
    http://<hostname>:50000/CPACache/refresh?mode=full
    Regards,
    Vinod.

Maybe you are looking for