SMALL BUSINESS SWITCH SLM 2024

Hi , for some reason, i cannot access the switch via the web interface. i reset the switch to factory settings , and the same thing happens. i tried to access the switch via a diferrent pc and still the same, i would appreciate some help on this.

Ishal,
Are you able to ping the device?
Have you changed the management vlan on the device by chance?
If all else fails have you Tried resetting the switch and plug directly into it and get into it with the default ip address of 192.168.1.254?

Similar Messages

SG200 Small business switch - vlan issue

I have the wonderous task of remotely configuring a few SG200 small business switches.
I need to create a vlan and move a few ports into that vlan, doesn't sound too difficult.
I have created the vlans but when I go to add the ports into the vlan the only option I seem to have is General?
If I specify access I can't say what vlan the port should be in?
What am I doing wrong?
All ports are currently in VLAN 1 and are in mode trunk
I have created 2 new vlans and just want to put 4 ports in VLAN 2 and 4 ports in VLAN 4
Can anyone impart any wisdom?
Thanks
Roger

Hi Roger,
Did you try this guide?
http://sbkb.cisco.com/CiscoSB/Loginr.aspx?login=1&pid=2&app=search&vw=1&articleid=80
Are you configuring it from GUI or CLI ?
Regards
Mariusz

Best small business switch for 100-300 user UC deployments

Hello,
The SMART Designs state that both the ESW500 and 300-series switches should not be used for deployments of over 100 IP phones.
But now that both the UC560 can go up to 138 (128 IP phones) and the BE3000 can go up to 300 users is this design restriction still valid or is the Catalyst 2960 and above the only options?
The QPT is still showing both the 300- and ESW500 switches as options for all versions of the UC560, and the 300- and 2960 switches are shown as valid options in the LAN for the BE3000.
Thanks.

Hi All,
I would agree with the folks at smartdesign, but for a very differerent reason as suggested by kmacpherson..
But think about the Business Edition 3000 (BE3000) and how it's supported. BE3000 is supported by the traditional Cisco TAC that also supports the catalyst 2960S etc....
The 300 series switch is supported by the wonder folk at the Small Business Support Center (SBSC) .
300 series of switches are generations ahead of the ESW switch in terms of switch silicon/features/GUI/supported CLI/IPv6 support etc..it is a tremendous switch series..
From my perspective, even though there is now a lot of dialogue between TAC and SBSC these days, it sorta makes a lot of sense in my mind to position Catalyst switches in conjunction with BE3000 for your end users, and 300 series small business switches as a lower cost alternative.
This will mean there will be pretty seamless TAC support for a BE3000, catalyst, ISRG2 solution.
regards Dave

Help blocking certain website and IP on a SG 300-20 Small Business Switch

Hi,
I like to block certain IP and website on the SG 300-20.
Being new to Cisco Small Business switch I she tried with no positive result. Could someone give me some steps or maybe direct me where I can find a step by step resource.
Thank you

Hello,
Thank you for contacting us for support with your device.
Unfortunately what you are trying to do is not possible with any Small Business switch.
It is true that this switch can be used in layer 3 and it will be able to route your traffic on the inside of the network, but it will not be able to route your traffic to the Internet as it doesn't do any NATting.
If you need to block any websites you will need to configure it on your router or firewall.
Just to be completely clear, this switch won't be able to block any websites.
I hope this was helpful

LMS 3.2 and Cisco Small Business Switches

Hi there,
I'm currently using LMS 3.2 to monitor my network. We've recently purchsed a few of the Cisco Small Business Switches, the SF 300-24 model to be exact. They're considered 'managed switches' (tho thier CLI is terrible) and I would like to monitor them in CWLMS. My problem is that once I add it to CS, it doesn't resolve to anything, just sits there as a blue box with a question mark. I'm assuming this means that these devices are not (currently) supported by LMS 3.2 - do you know if that will change, or how I can go about managing this device with LMS 3.2?
Thanks

Unfortunately that series of products is not supported in any version of LMS (or even Cisco Network Assistant - CNA).
Cisco provides the FindIt utility to manage them:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps10660/tsd_products_support_series_home.html
Hope this helps.

Small Business switches and POODLE

Has Cisco done any research into small business switches being vulnerable to POODLE? I know they're working hard on the enterprise side, but I'm not finding any information on the small business side.

Hi,
All Cisco product will be checked and results are posted on the same page as for enterprise:
http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20141015-poodle
Regards,
Aleksandra

Issues with Small Business Switch config

Hi, I know that if I read the documentation I will come to the answers but I would really like some input from someone with more knowledge than me. I have an issue with Cisco SF300 , one of the Small Business Switches. I have a single interface on my router and I need to separate my internal networks , I thought that one way would be to use VLANs. On my two internal networks one network only has unmanaged D-Link switches, the other has the Cisco SF300 so I did as follows.
On the Cisco Switch, all ports default to Trunk ports. I have changed FE1-FE24 and GE1-2 to access ports.
Created two VLANS and placed FE1-FE24 in VLAN10 (also my management VLAN) , GE3 is a trunk Port for VLAN20 untagged, VLAN 20 uplinks to my DiLink Switches. This way traffic from my unmanaged switches comes in on a trunk port untagged on VLAN20.
GE4 is a trunk port and I have assigned VLAN1 untagged, VLAN10 tagged and VLAN20 tagged. VLAN 10 and VLAN 20 then forward to my Router.
The plan was to connect GE4 to my router however I had two things happen I can not explain.
Firstly as soon as I connected my D-Link to GE3 the LAN on VLAN20 went down, I could not ping Servers from PCs etc, all devices are connected to the unmanaged D-Links. Secondly the VLAN Assigment changed on GE3 and GE4 , VLANs 10 and 20 disappeared and only the default VLAN was assigned, also under VLAN Settings my VLAN interface state for VLAN20 shows Disabled. Also one of my access ports FE12 keeps changing VLAN.
Can anyone offer any suggestions as to what might have crashed the LAN and why my VLANs change. I did write my running config to the start up config by the way.
I added two screen shots.
I would seriously appreciate some help.
Thanks
Bob

Hi Garrett, thanks for your reply to my post, I hope you are well. I called Cisco support, they told me that they could not understand why this was happening and suggested a firmware upgrade, usually something I should have considered right from the beginning. This solved the issue for me.
Thanks
Bob

Small business switches and CDP

what switches in the small business category support CDP?
I took a look at the SGE and SFE series but nothing was mentioned about CDP support. I would like something lower grade than the ESW series if possible.

You may want to take a look at the Cisco Small Business 200 and the 300 Series switches, both switch lines now support CDP.

DHCP SNOOPING IN CISCO SF200-48 SMALL BUSINESS SWITCH

Please help me out. I need to know whether dhcp snooping is available in cisco firmware version 1.3.7.18.

Hi Bonnie, as far as I know DHCP snooping is not on the SX200 switch.I also am unable to find documentation within release notes and the admin guide stating it does.

So, does STP just not work on the Small Business Switches?

Hi All,
I have an SG500-52P switch, and a catalyst 3650 switch. I want to connect two links between the switches, and have STP block one of them for redundancy in the event of a link failure. When I set this up, I got a duplicate IP address discovered message in the 500 switch, followed by the network crashing/locking up from what I can only assume was an STP loop. Show spanning-tree on the 3650 before the crash showed that both of the ports were in FWD state - meaning that STP was not blocking redundant paths.
Verification that STP is running and BPDU's are flooding on the 500 can be found below:
SW500A#show spanning-tree
Spanning tree enabled mode RSTP
Default port cost method: long
Root ID Priority 24577
Address a0:ec:f9:ef:6a:00
Cost 20000
Port gi1/1/43
Hello Time 2 sec Max Age 20 sec Forward Delay 15 sec
Bridge ID Priority 32768
Address 2c:3e:cf:ff:11:82
Hello Time 2 sec Max Age 20 sec Forward Delay 15 sec
SW500A#show spanning-tree bpdu
Global: Flooding
SW3650#show spanning-tree
VLAN0001
Spanning tree enabled protocol ieee
Root ID Priority 24577
Address a0ec.f9ef.6a00
This bridge is the root
Hello Time 2 sec Max Age 20 sec Forward Delay 15 sec
Bridge ID Priority 24577 (priority 24576 sys-id-ext 1)
Address a0ec.f9ef.6a00
Hello Time 2 sec Max Age 20 sec Forward Delay 15 sec
Aging Time 300 sec
SW3650#show spanning-tree sum
Switch is in pvst mode
Root bridge for: VLAN0001, VLAN0003
Extended system ID is enabled
Portfast Default is disabled
PortFast BPDU Guard Default is disabled
Portfast BPDU Filter Default is disabled
Loopguard Default is disabled
EtherChannel misconfig guard is enabled
UplinkFast is disabled
BackboneFast is disabled
Configured Pathcost method used is short
The only thing I see is that the cost method in the 500 is long, while the cost method in the 3650 is short.
Am I missing something?

Hi
from your outputs seems that both switches understand each-other BPDU's (at least via one link!), because SW500A is not root bridge for that segment and accepts SW3650 to be root bridge.
> spanning-tree on the 3650 before the crash showed that both of the ports were in FWD state
I hope this is correct behavior as SW3650 is root bridge. This means that all ports on root bridge are designated ports and thus are in FWD state.
The switch-port which should be blocked must be on opposite (non-root) switch SW500A.
But be careful in your scenario: there could be potentially compatibility issue as:
SW500A is using Rapid STP (single - common - instance over all VLAN's)
SW3650 is using PVST+ (Per VLAN Spanning Tree)
the compatibility works in this scenario only in case, that all links between SW3650 and SW500A use VLAN1 as untagged VLAN.
That means: to allow Cisco SW3650 switch running rapid PVST+ or PVST+ to form a common spanning tree with SW500A switch running RSTP or STP, vlan1 (the native VLAN) must be configured as untagged on the SW3650 ports connected to SW500A switch.
If this is not met, it can leads to switching loops. And that could be your case.

How to setup Private VLAN in Small business switch SF200-24

Dear All,
According release notes 1.4 , private vlan is supported. I've upgraded my SF200-24 with firmware 1.4.0.88 and boot 1.3.5.06. The system information show firmware version 1.4.0.88 and boot version 1.3.5.06 after reboot. I can't find private vlan setup command on GUI. Please help me to setup private vlan. Thanks.

Hi,
Unfortunately PVLAN is not supported on 200 series. However you might be able to overcome this using general port concept.
for example:
isolated port - general 10P (PVID), 30U, drop tagged traffic
community - 20UP, 30U, drop tagged traffic
promiscuous - 30UP, 10U, 20U
Note: primary vlan 30
does it address your requirements?
Aleksandra

How to choose switches, ipphones and copy machine for small business?

Hello,
I'm designing a network system for Nextrio Company. Right now, I'm going to choose a copy machine which has fax function; a small switch which could connect this copy machine and several other computers; several ip phone for small business.
Could you tell me the type and cost of these devices I should choose?
Many thanks,

Hi Hanhan,
For the least amount of operational expernditure, and for great functionality at a small business price, I would suggest humbly that you look at the 300 series switch family.
The tolly group comparative report on our switch can be seen at the following link.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps10898/Cisco300SeriesLANSwitchComparison.pdf
I would suggest you check out the following models and get pricing. the switches come in 10/100Mb/sec speed or Gigabit speeds depending on the switch port count and your needs;
Model Name
Your ordering P/N
Description
Fast Ethernet - access port 10/100MB/sec
SF300-08
SRW208-K9
• 8 10/100 ports
SF302-08
SRW208G-K9
• 8 10/100 ports• 2 combo* mini-GBIC ports
SF302-08P
SRW208P-K9
• 8/10/100 PoE ports• 2 combo mini-GBIC ports
SF302-08MP
SRW208MP-K9
• 8 10/100 Maximum PoE ports
• 2 combo mini-GBIC ports
SF300-24
SRW224G4-K9
• 24 10/100 ports
• 2 10/100/1000 ports
• 2 combo mini-GBIC ports
SF300-24P
SRW224G4P-K9
• 24 10/100 PoE ports
• 2 10/100/1000 ports
• 2 combo mini-GBIC ports
SF300-48
SRW248G4-K9
• 48 10/100 ports
• 2 10/100/1000 ports
• 2 combo mini-GBIC
SF300-48P
SRW248G4P-K9
• 48 10/100 PoE ports
• 2 10/100/1000 ports
• 2 combo mini-GBIC ports
Gigabit Ethernet - access ports 10/100/1000Mb/sec
SG300-10
SRW2008-K9
• 8 10/100/1000 ports
• 2 combo mini-GBIC ports
SG300-10P
SRW2008P-K9
• 8 10/100/1000 PoE ports
• 2 Combo mini-GBIC ports
SG300-10MP
SRW2008MP-K9
• 8 10/100/1000 Maximum PoE ports
• 2 combo mini-GBIC ports
SG300-20
SRW2016-K9
• 18 10/100/1000 ports
• 2 combo mini-GBIC ports
SG300-28
SRW2024-K9
• 26 10/100/1000 ports
• 2 combo mini-GBIC ports
SG300-28P
SRW2024P-K9
• 26 10/100/1000 PoE ports
• 2 combo mini-GBIC ports
SG300-52
SRW2048-K9
• 50 10/100/1000 ports
• 2 combo mini-GBIC ports
regards Dave

Does Cisco ISE 1.2 support Catalyst SRW224G4P and Small business ESW520 Switches?

Hello all,
Does Cisco ISE 1.2 support Catalyst SRW224G4P and Small business ESW520 Switches?
Best regards.

Hi there, the link below outlines the ISE supported Cisco hardware:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/1-3/compatibility/ise_sdt.html
Thank you for rating helpful posts!

No command line interface on SF200 small business smart switches?

Hi all, we just received 5 new SF200-48 Smart Switches for small business. I noticed only way I can configure them is by using the web gui. Is there a way to enable good old CLI?

Thanks. Will do.
I do have another quick question, possibly a dumb one. The reason why I ordered 5 of these smart switches is to replace a bunch of hubs that are still in operation at one of our offices. Now is it safe to assume that these "smart switches" will infact work like traditional switches i.e. separate collision domain on each port? I guess what I am trying to ask is whether or not "smart switch" is just another name for a hub in Cisco's language? I don't want to roll these out and then end up with the same situation that I currently have with the hubs.

Como cambiarle el Password a un Switch Cisco Small Business SF500-24 Y GG300-28P

Hola tengo un problema tengo un Switch Small Business SF500-24 y el nombre de usuario y contraseña no lo tengo, estube viendo que entrando en modo Rommon uno puede configurarlo y cambiarle el password sin que se pierda la configuracion que tiene, lo que no encuentro es la forma de como entrar en modo Rommon, POR FAVOR NECESITO LA COMBINACION DE TECLA PARA ENTRAR EN MODO ROMMON EN ESTE MODELO DE SWITCH.

Hola liriantech,
Gracias por el tema.
En los switches de la serie 200(más de 8 puertos )/300/500 estás capaz de recuperar la contraseña del usuario administrativo através de entrar en el boot menú. Los pasos son los siguientes: debes conectarte al switch através por serie. Después de verificar la conexión debes reiniciar el switch y prestar atención: durante el reinicio, después de la verificación del hardware, te aparecerá el banner de Cisco. Junto por abajo de aquello te saldrá la opción de pinchar Exit o Enter para terminar el proceso de carga. Debes prestar atención ya que aquella opción será disponible solo por 2 segundos. Através de parrar la carga te aparecerá el boot menú. Opción “3” se llama Recuperar la Contraseña, pincha “3” y 2 veces Enter. El switch continuará la carga pero te dejará entrar en modo privilegiado sin usuario y contraseña solo esta vez. Ahora, através del acceso CLI, debes crear un usuario y añadir contraseña al aquello de nivel 15 en esta forma:
Switch#conf t
Switch(configure)#username <user> password <password> privilege 15
Este usuario será disponible para las entradas siguientes.
Te pedimos tratarlo e informarles cómo te ha salido.
Una cosa más: en general el soporte en el fórum se ofrece en Ingles para que puedan todos los clientes acceder la información. Entiendo de que podría ser gran molestia pero te pido amablemente escribir en Ingles como lo puedas.
Gracias por la atención y buenos días.
.:|:.:|:. CISCO | Victor Apostolov | Network Engineer | Cisco Technical Support

SMALL BUSINESS SWITCH SLM 2024

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for