Small Business switches and POODLE

Has Cisco done any research into small business switches being vulnerable to POODLE?  I know they're working hard on the enterprise side, but I'm not finding any information on the small business side.
 

Hi,
All Cisco product will be checked and results are posted on the same page as for enterprise:
http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20141015-poodle
Regards,
Aleksandra

Similar Messages

  • Small business switches and CDP

    what switches in the small business category support CDP?
    I took a look at the SGE and SFE series but nothing was mentioned about CDP support.  I would like something lower grade than the ESW series if possible.

    You may want to take a look at the Cisco Small Business 200 and the 300 Series switches, both switch lines now support CDP.

  • Help blocking certain website and IP on a SG 300-20 Small Business Switch

    Hi,
    I like to block certain IP and website on the SG 300-20.
    Being new to Cisco Small Business switch I she tried with no positive result. Could someone give me some steps or maybe direct me where I can find a step by step resource.
    Thank you

    Hello, 
    Thank you for contacting us for support with your device.
    Unfortunately what you are trying to do is not possible with any Small Business switch.
    It is true that this switch can be used in layer 3 and it will be able to route your traffic on the inside of the network, but it will not be able to route your traffic to the Internet as it doesn't do any NATting.
    If you need to block any websites you will need to configure it on your router or firewall.
    Just to be completely clear, this switch won't be able to block any websites.
    I hope this was helpful

  • LMS 3.2 and Cisco Small Business Switches

    Hi there,
    I'm currently using LMS 3.2 to monitor my network. We've recently purchsed a few of the Cisco Small Business Switches, the SF 300-24 model to be exact. They're considered 'managed switches' (tho thier CLI is terrible) and I would like to monitor them in CWLMS. My problem is that once I add it to CS, it doesn't resolve to anything, just sits there as a blue box with a question mark. I'm assuming this means that these devices are not (currently) supported by LMS 3.2 - do you know if that will change, or how I can go about managing this device with LMS 3.2?
    Thanks

    Unfortunately that series of products is not supported in any version of LMS (or even Cisco Network Assistant - CNA).
    Cisco provides the FindIt utility to manage them:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps10660/tsd_products_support_series_home.html
    Hope this helps.

  • SG200 Small business switch - vlan issue

    I have the wonderous task of remotely configuring a few SG200 small business switches.
    I need to create a vlan and move a few ports into that vlan, doesn't sound too difficult.
    I have created the vlans but when I go to add the ports into the vlan the only option I seem to have is General?
    If I specify access I can't say what vlan the port should be in?
    What am I doing wrong?
    All ports are currently in VLAN 1 and are in mode trunk
    I have created 2 new vlans and just want to put 4 ports in VLAN 2 and 4 ports in VLAN 4
    Can anyone impart any wisdom?
    Thanks
    Roger

    Hi Roger,
    Did you try this guide?
    http://sbkb.cisco.com/CiscoSB/Loginr.aspx?login=1&pid=2&app=search&vw=1&articleid=80
    Are you configuring it from GUI or CLI ?
    Regards
    Mariusz

  • Best small business switch for 100-300 user UC deployments

    Hello,
    The SMART Designs state that both the ESW500 and 300-series switches should not be used for deployments of over 100 IP phones.
    But now that both the UC560 can go up to 138 (128 IP phones) and the BE3000 can go up to 300 users is this design restriction still valid or is the Catalyst 2960 and above the only options?
    The QPT is still showing both the 300- and ESW500  switches as options for all versions of the UC560, and the 300- and 2960  switches are shown as valid options in the LAN for the BE3000.
    Thanks.

    Hi All,
    I would agree with the folks at smartdesign, but for a very differerent reason as suggested by kmacpherson..
    But think about the Business Edition 3000 (BE3000) and how it's supported.  BE3000 is supported by the traditional Cisco TAC that also supports the catalyst 2960S etc....
    The 300 series switch is supported by the wonder folk at the  Small Business Support Center (SBSC) . 
    300 series of switches are generations ahead of the ESW switch in terms of switch silicon/features/GUI/supported CLI/IPv6 support  etc..it is a tremendous switch series..
    From my perspective, even though there is now a lot of dialogue between TAC and SBSC these days, it sorta makes a lot of sense in my mind to position Catalyst switches  in conjunction with  BE3000 for your end users,  and 300 series small business switches as a lower cost alternative.
    This will mean there will be pretty seamless TAC support for a BE3000,  catalyst, ISRG2 solution.
    regards Dave

  • Issues with Small Business Switch config

    Hi, I know that if I read the documentation I will come to the answers but I would really like some input from someone with more knowledge than me. I have an issue with Cisco SF300 , one of the Small Business Switches. I have a single interface on my router and I need to separate my internal networks , I thought that one way would be to use VLANs. On my two internal networks one network only has unmanaged D-Link switches, the other has the Cisco SF300 so I did as follows. 
    On the Cisco Switch, all ports default to Trunk ports. I have changed FE1-FE24 and GE1-2 to access ports.
    Created two VLANS and placed FE1-FE24 in VLAN10 (also my management VLAN) , GE3 is a trunk Port for VLAN20 untagged, VLAN 20 uplinks to my DiLink Switches. This way traffic from my unmanaged switches comes in on a trunk port untagged on VLAN20.
    GE4 is a trunk port and I have assigned  VLAN1 untagged, VLAN10 tagged and VLAN20 tagged. VLAN 10 and VLAN 20 then forward to my Router.
    The plan was to connect GE4 to my router however I had two things happen I can not explain.
    Firstly as soon as I connected my D-Link to GE3 the LAN on VLAN20 went down, I could not ping Servers from PCs etc, all devices are connected to the unmanaged D-Links. Secondly the VLAN Assigment changed on GE3 and GE4 , VLANs 10 and 20 disappeared and only the default VLAN was assigned, also under VLAN Settings my VLAN interface state for VLAN20 shows Disabled. Also one of my access ports FE12 keeps changing VLAN.
    Can anyone offer any suggestions as to what might have crashed the LAN and why my VLANs change. I did write my running config to the start up config by the way.
    I added two screen shots. 
    I would seriously appreciate some help.
    Thanks 
    Bob

    Hi Garrett, thanks for your reply to my post, I hope you are well. I called Cisco support, they told me that they could not understand why this was happening and suggested a firmware upgrade, usually something I should have considered right from the beginning. This solved the issue for me.
    Thanks
    Bob

  • I'm trying to download office 365 small business package, and every time I try the website it says there is a runtime service error in the '/' application. Is this my mac or is it the website, and how can I fix it?

    I'm trying to download office 365 small business package, and every time I try the website it says there is a runtime service error in the '/' application. Is this my mac or is it the website, and how can I fix it?

    If a phone is sold from one friend to another and wants to use it on a different carrier the friend can contact the carrier it was sold by to request it unlocked.  I know AT&T, Verizon, and Sprint will give you the steps to unlock it as long as the original contract it was bought under has been completed.  eBay/Craigslist is really not the best place to try to get "unlocked phones" from, if it turns out the phone isn't unlocked then I'm really sorry you got stuck with that one and as stevejobsfan said above I would report them immediately and see if you can recover your money.  I sell phones for a living and this happens a lot

  • Exchange 2003 Small Business Server and iPhones

    I know that there are a lot of questions on this, but I think mine may be unique.
    Current Environment:
    Small Business Server 2003  All Patched and Current.
    I cannot get any IOS device to successfully recieve emails or calendar items using ActiveSync.  For any other device, Android tablet or phone, Balckberry tablet or phone, Windows phone, all work.
    Symptoms:  I can create the account on the device, and it will verify the account(internally or externally).  This is evident by the check marks, and the return to the account screen in the settings menu.  Checking mail however, bring the 'Cannot Get Mail, Connection to server failed' message.
    Specific example, I have a user Bob.  I can set Bob up with activesync email on any Android, Microsoft, or BlackBerry device; but Bob's iPhone will not work.
    I have run through these forums a few times.  Things we've tried:
    The 'Inhereit Security Settings from Parent' in ADUC.  Checked for all users, and not applicable.
    Verified OMA in System manager, and 'Unsupported Devices' is checked.
    Safari on an IOS device will connect up internally or externally to our mail.company.com address.
    Test Exchange Connectivity reports a correct configuration.
    Recreation of accounts does not resolve the issue.
    No errors reported in Event Log of note.  Some TermServDevices erorrs, but they are related to printers and my rdp connection.
    Restarted MSExchSA, IISAdmin, and related services.
    Permissions of IIS 'Default Website' directories are in line with Microsoft guidlines.
    Restarted the server.
    ried using the internal name of our server connected to internal wifi.  Same results.

    Hi got a new iPhone 4 that came with IOS 6.1.3.   It turns out that I can not connect it to an exchange 2013 server.
    When I set it up it puts checks all the way through like it's going to work, then when I open the mail app and try to get emails, it says it can not get mail, the connection to the server failed.
    I have read that there were exchange problems with ios 6.1.1 and that 6.1.2 corrected them, but I also think 6.1.3 broke connection to exchange 2013
    It works fine, on exchange 2010, and I have other devices, like android that can connect to the 2013 server

  • SMALL BUSINESS SWITCH SLM 2024

    Hi , for some reason, i cannot access the switch via the web interface. i reset the switch to factory settings , and the same thing happens. i tried to access the switch via a diferrent pc and still the same, i would appreciate some help on this.

    Ishal,
    Are you able to ping the device?
    Have you changed the management vlan on the device by chance?
    If all else fails have you Tried resetting the switch and plug directly into it and get into it with the default ip address of 192.168.1.254?

  • So, does STP just not work on the Small Business Switches?

    Hi All,
    I have an SG500-52P switch, and a catalyst 3650 switch.  I want to connect two links between the switches, and have STP block one of them for redundancy in the event of a link failure.  When I set this up, I got a duplicate IP address discovered message in the 500 switch, followed by the network crashing/locking up from what I can only assume was an STP loop.  Show spanning-tree on the 3650 before the crash showed that both of the ports were in FWD state - meaning that STP was not blocking redundant paths.
    Verification that STP is running and BPDU's are flooding on the 500 can be found below:
    SW500A#show spanning-tree
    Spanning tree enabled mode RSTP
    Default port cost method:  long
      Root ID    Priority    24577
                 Address     a0:ec:f9:ef:6a:00
                 Cost        20000
                 Port        gi1/1/43
                 Hello Time  2 sec  Max Age 20 sec  Forward Delay 15 sec
      Bridge ID  Priority    32768
                 Address     2c:3e:cf:ff:11:82
                 Hello Time  2 sec  Max Age 20 sec  Forward Delay 15 sec
    SW500A#show spanning-tree bpdu
    Global: Flooding
    SW3650#show spanning-tree
    VLAN0001
      Spanning tree enabled protocol ieee
      Root ID    Priority    24577
                 Address     a0ec.f9ef.6a00
                 This bridge is the root
                 Hello Time   2 sec  Max Age 20 sec  Forward Delay 15 sec
      Bridge ID  Priority    24577  (priority 24576 sys-id-ext 1)
                 Address     a0ec.f9ef.6a00
                 Hello Time   2 sec  Max Age 20 sec  Forward Delay 15 sec
                 Aging Time  300 sec
    SW3650#show spanning-tree  sum
    Switch is in pvst mode
    Root bridge for: VLAN0001, VLAN0003
    Extended system ID           is enabled
    Portfast Default             is disabled
    PortFast BPDU Guard Default  is disabled
    Portfast BPDU Filter Default is disabled
    Loopguard Default            is disabled
    EtherChannel misconfig guard is enabled
    UplinkFast                   is disabled
    BackboneFast                 is disabled
    Configured Pathcost method used is short
    The only thing I see is that the cost method in the 500 is long, while the cost method in the 3650 is short.
    Am I missing something?

    Hi
    from your outputs seems that both switches understand each-other BPDU's (at least via one link!), because SW500A is not root bridge for that segment and accepts SW3650 to be root bridge.
    > spanning-tree on the 3650 before the crash showed that both of the ports were in FWD state
    I hope this is correct behavior as SW3650 is root bridge. This means that all ports on root bridge are designated ports and thus are in FWD state.
    The switch-port which should be blocked must be on opposite (non-root) switch SW500A.
    But be careful in your scenario: there could be potentially compatibility issue as:
    SW500A is using Rapid STP (single - common - instance over all VLAN's)
    SW3650 is using PVST+ (Per VLAN Spanning Tree)
    the compatibility works in this scenario only in case, that all links between SW3650  and SW500A use VLAN1 as untagged VLAN.
    That means: to allow Cisco SW3650 switch running rapid PVST+ or PVST+ to form a common spanning tree with SW500A switch running RSTP or STP, vlan1 (the native VLAN) must be configured as untagged on the SW3650 ports connected to SW500A switch.
    If this is not met, it can leads to switching loops. And that could be your case.

  • DHCP SNOOPING IN CISCO SF200-48 SMALL BUSINESS SWITCH

    Please help me out. I need to know whether dhcp snooping is available in cisco firmware version 1.3.7.18.  

    Hi Bonnie, as far as I know DHCP snooping is not on the SX200 switch.I also am unable to find documentation within release notes and the admin guide stating it does.

  • How to setup Private VLAN in Small business switch SF200-24

    Dear All,
    According release notes 1.4 , private vlan is supported. I've upgraded my SF200-24 with firmware 1.4.0.88 and boot 1.3.5.06. The system information show firmware version 1.4.0.88 and boot version 1.3.5.06 after reboot. I can't find private vlan setup command on GUI. Please help me to setup private vlan. Thanks.

    Hi,
    Unfortunately PVLAN is not supported on 200 series. However you might be able to overcome this using general port concept.
    for example:
    isolated port - general 10P (PVID), 30U, drop tagged traffic
    community - 20UP, 30U, drop tagged traffic
    promiscuous - 30UP, 10U, 20U
    Note: primary vlan 30
    does it address your requirements?
    Aleksandra

  • Remote Access to Windows Small Business Server System via VPN

    Same old story: I use macs at home but I want to be able to connect to our small company Windows network over the internet to pick up and put down files.
    Said company network consists of a server running Microsoft Small Business Server and Exchange. The data sits on some network drives (Z: etc, you know the sort of thing).
    I've sorted out email access - I just connect to the Exchange Webmail interface and do all that using a web browser at home.
    Now for data: well, I have successfully connected to our company network using VPN PPTP by following the guidance in Pogue's Missing Manual. The VPN window reports that I am connected to ip 192.168.0.150 which our network guru tells me is the address of the "Internal virtual network adapter on the VPN." The actual server PC with the data on it is at .100.
    Now, he's a great guy and everything but is definitely a Microsoft man only. When I asked him how to browse our network files on the server he told me to set up a network share using Windows explorer.
    So..can anyone please advise how I can translate that action into OSX land? I have searched the Apple support papers but with no success. These days most hits for VPN concern the blessed iPhone....
    I have tried in the finder running connect to server and typing in smb://servername. That returns error code -36 "the finder cannot complete the operation because some data in [that address] cannot be read or written". I have tried using the company lan IP address for the server instead and that returns "name or password is not correct".
    I appreciate these things often depend completely on the fine details of our setup. If nothing else, does anyone know a good book to assist here - Pogue is a great basic guide but not really detailed enough for this sort of thing. Failing that, how do I find out what error -36 means? Ta.
    Message was edited by: Matt McGrath bis

    For error -36, might try this...
    http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=301580
    For stubborn Mac<->Windows® problems...
    http://www.thursby.com/products/admitmac.html
    Other solutions...
    http://www.thejackol.com/2005/09/21/os-x-and-windows-server-2003-file-sharing/

  • Mail for Exchange / Small Business Server

    It appears that Nokia has overlooked a part of the market with its Mail for Exchange application. Apparently, M4E has difficulty communicating with Exchange if it is part of Small Business Server and a self signed certificate is used.
    It would be a good idea if someone at Nokia reads this and cares to put it on a list of 'things we could do - to keep customers happy". Small Business Sever is Microsoft's Server product for up to 75 clients. That is a nice world wide market of small businesses that are known to adept quickly, unlike larger organizations.
    This lack of "sweating the details" has caused me personally probably 20-30 hours, and judging from the the number of entries other people have also wasted lots of time.
    In addition to the time wasted, we are now forced to purchased a commercial server certificate.
    More details on the M4E/SBS issue can be found here: http://blogs.technet.com/sbs/archive/2006/12/07/us​ing-a-nokia-device-to-sync-with-small-business-ser​...

    Has this been corrected in 1.5.0? the realser notes state
    "Support for Microsoft Small Business Server"
    John32

Maybe you are looking for