Small request regarding quoting posts in the screenshots thread

I have a small request for all of you who regularly reply to posts in the screenshots thread - when you quote someone, could you please ensure that the link that shows up in the quoted post is to the full image, and not the thumbnail? It defaults to the thumbnail, and that's very annoying, as you then have to hunt through the previous posts until you find the one that's being referenced, which is sometimes pages back.
Thanks!
Last edited by CosineQuaNon (2010-06-17 00:16:15)

rb wrote:
CosineQuaNon wrote:There are still people using ImageShack! I don't understand what's so difficult about using omploader or imgur instead, particularly when there's a command line tool for omploading.
May I ask what's wrong with Imageshack? (an honest question!)
The links to the images are longer, and there isn't an officially sanctioned command line upload tool.
However, what gets to me the most is when people use the "forum code" provided by ImageShack. When you click on the thumbnail, instead of taking you directly to the image, you go to an intermediate page, from which you have to click again to get to the image itself. Here is a perfect example.
Edit: arinlares fixed his post (thanks!), so here are some other examples:
These are from ImageBam:
http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php? … 60#p785560
http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php? … 86#p785586
This from deviantART: http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php? … 14#p785414 (deviantART is a little more understable, since he's linking to his personal page, but since he's got a link to it in his sig, that seems a little redundant).
As you can see, the same sort of issue.
Last edited by w1ntermute (2010-07-04 07:01:54)

Similar Messages

  • Rather than persists in the future thread...

    The point I was making would be for Archs documents to pick up where man pages leave off, but whatever.
    If you think I stated Arch must fix man pages, not so. I was intending to show that docs as a whole, leave whole subjects unhandled, Arch could provide the answers in its own docs and come out as a hero.
    Or maybe not.
    And remember, users who cannot configure ppp cannot get on the internet to get the ppp configuration docs. Or any other docs, for that matter. One failed configuration needing web documents might leave the newbie stranded.
    Or maybe not.
    I personally think that a lot of configuration has to be made before Linux (Arch or others) will communicate over the internet to a remote website, so as to allow documentation to be visible..... but hey, maybe I missed something? Like the document to get a modem setup? So I could get web based documents? Chicken and egg?
    Maybe not, eh?
    As for the concept of needing to be an experienced admin - these folks usually do not need any docs. That compares to bad docs to a newbie - essentially no docs. Missing docs and no internet access are also useless. Thus, the newbie without documents needs the only thing which gets anyone else through the issue - the newbie needs experience, because the docs are weak or missing or erroneous. Try as you might, that is an issue I went through. Take, for example, when I needed network assistance. Archs forums were not the first place I went asking for help, believe me; I asked and am still asking. 2 years now, and I'm just getting told Samba. Need I say this is baloney? That issue is not Archs fault, but Arch could have a smashing success on its hands if it were to document a few critical areas as well as 0.2 was documented.
    Installing and partitioning... What can I say... apeiro is not mentioning anything I've PM'd him about: secondary hard disks getting reformatted. My pm brought me the answer that most Archers never repartition, so the script was.... well, I guess you could say it was a shot in the dark. Fine, but the PM stated the alternative was something like 'I usually use the commandline stuff and simply reformat the existing partitions'.
    Why the **** would an inexperienced newbie set up partitions outside of using the installer?? The Arch docs tells the newbie to use the installer to partition their hard disks! What, exactly, is the newbies idea of an installers purpose? Are you a newbie when you decide what a newbie has for skills? The installer obliterated gigabytes of data, I trusted that it was going to perform safely, and yet nobody ever used it to learn of the glitch? Ooookkaaaaayyyy.
    Folks, the docs said to use the installer. Never mentioned possibly partitioning from the command line. Take your pick, the newbie was not at fault for following the docs.
    I'll run along, because I cannot possibly be speaking truth. Neither am I telling you where I had problems. This is cannot be feedback, it must be dunbars rantings. Does Arch have a future when feedback is considered trolling or flaming the developers? Lighten up, folks, I had once been trying to offer help and sought to get help.
    I know this is a labor of love for you all; in many ways, Linux is a labor of mine as well. Sadly, you are not hearing some issue that could help make Arch the distro that some folks want it to be.

    dunbar wrote:Step by step: I mentioned a few weak areas that newbies would not know how to address.
    I mentioned that newbie would not necessarily have the skills to get the correct docs from a myriad of websites.
    Which appear (and frequently are) obsolete.
    Well, then we include the docs and then non-newbies would complain that we are cluttering the filesytem and you would complain because those documents are obsolete. sound familiar? i have seen this argument before and there is not winning it. people bitch about the manpages, docs, etc ALL THE TIME. you must know that. so the best we can do is add your concerns to our own documents and add necessary documents to the files.
    When their internet connection was what had failed, the internet doc is not available.
    And when they had no Xwindows in which to read HTML documents,
    and nothing tells the newbie about CLI browsers.
    i would expect that no absolute green newbies would try arch so those newbies that do show up i would assume have some linux experience (one can be a newbie and have some experience) so i would assume that they would know about lynx or links browsers or at least know how to use cat and less.
    another point about this is that if a newbie does not even know how to use cat, less, or a cli editor to view files then they would be very very f**ked with arch linux and having self contained documents would be pretty pointless. so again i would ask is it not wise to print out/write down any relevent install/configuration instructions? you do know how to write since you already say you don't have a printer?
    okay so if we include install configuration data in the installer will you know how to access it? is it fair to tell the user that it is in such and such directory and you can access it through say vc1-4? should we scrap our online docs altogether and just have them self contained?
    The network thing was changed along the way - IPX/SPX was part of the issue, my 5 port switch is another part. I am not berating you, sarah31, nor am I asking anyone to re-write man pages, etc. as several posts seemed to attribute to me. The man pages are the weak spot, Arch docs need to go from there. Never wanted to say more than that.
    and all i wanted to know is what apps do we extend our documentation to? all of them? are you saying that all our apps need extended docs? can you point me to one distro that has extended documents of all their applications? besides ppp what would YOU extend? it is fair to ask this of arch developers/users but they really need to know just what manpages are defunct and have no bearing on arch.
    i would not expect a request like this would get fulfilled too quickly there are lots of applications' man pages and docs to go through then the developers would have to determine what is needed and what is not.
    as for manpages......i used to find them unreliable but to be honest most manpages i have viewed lately have been very clear and concise about how to operate/configure apps. i am not saying this to contradict you but i say it honestly. when i have been unable to find someone to ask on this forum or irc manpages normally do the trick for me. (and don't say it is because i am some expert with linux because i a definitely not)
    I'm trying to point out that A] with a presumed goal of gaining Linux users,
    B] Arch, being small, uncluttered and likely attractive to newbies (small draws newbies because it is so small (dialup accessible but only one big download at a time) and older systems where XP won't fit on their disks, etc) and also
    C] since Arch had very tight documents covering what needed to be done (but might need more topics covered), I felt that was likely going to lead to newbies arriving here in some situations that
    D] Arch clearly tries to assume will not need the attentions of forum members (which have the skills) and
    E] the newbie does not have the skills.
    That would lead to the assumption that Arch was not interested in the users needs.
    with respect to this.....well what can i say but you are a complete ***hole. for one thing small does not always attract newbies in fact i know ALOT ALOT ALOT of people that will not even try arch or similar distros because they are small. most people want the choice to kludge up their system if they like but arch is not in this realm yet because we do not offer alot of packages.
    i agree we need more stuff covered in our documents and you would not find a single user or developer that would disagree with you. So i guess this point you make throws out your idea of extending the manpages because that is not a concise project (for example manpages for transcode are good but to get into all the basics a newbie would need to know would require one to be alot more verbose similarily with networking documents)?
    to say that we here do not pay attention to users is ABSOLUTELY THE WRONG ANSWER. there are only two pages of unanswered post and considering there are always post that are merely statements that do not need to be answered that is very good. in fact if you even bothered to check there are only 79 unanswered posts out of 4512. that's 1.75% of the posts on the forum are unanswered. besides that there are always questions that no one has an answer to. obscure problems do exist i know i have hit many in my ventures in any OS.
    besides this forums are a free service. no one is under obligation to use it user AND developers alike. no one is paid here so don't diss anyone and don't feel that anyone is obligated to answer you.
    i can also say that you are a complete arrogant ass for saying arch does not care about its users. we don't care about you that is for certain. but i can guarantee that everything i did every package i made, upgraded, donated, fixed, etc was for the user. people wanted openoffice i spent a week building it then it got broken with the upgrade to gcc 3.3 i spent another week trying to fix it without luck then judd spent 3 days compiling and patching 1.1. so do you EVER say we don't fucking care you little ingrate.
    The perceived 'lack of clarity' on my part is because I am still a newbie. I might have a few things working under Slackware, but I'm not certain, today, where I even made the changes. I'm not asking for hints on how to keep a notebook, I have one, it is 40 miles away, I cannot discuss Linux by reading my notes or grepping my config files, they are 40 miles away. I cannot log into my Linux PC, I only have dial up, the only telephone line in my house is for voice communications. DSL is too far away, Cable is too expensive.... have I never said any of this before? No, not in this thread, but I've always been a hardliner on those points sarah31. I do not match up with what is assumed of me. But here I am, posting, despite my ineptitude.
    "Waaagh i'm a newbie. waggh i don't have highspeed pity me pity meee!"
    there are lots of users on dialup here including developers so we don't give a flying f**k.
    I believe the deepest undercurrent I see here is diverging viewpoints of what Arch is and diverging goals for Arch. My views are different from a few who assume the Archer has the skills, hApy seems to have a third viewpoint, and yet a third viewpoint exists.
    yeah and you are saying we have to conform to your view. typical. funny we seem to be getting more and more users all the time both newbie and non newbie and this despite having a completely uncaring development team and a horrendous set of docs. one of the funny things is that many of the newbies recently are all dialup like you and they still take time to make irc interesting or contribute packages.
    If my posts reflect an atmosphere of bewildering viewpoiints, I'm not surprised - I've tried to reply to differing posts which take differing opinions; I suppose it is frustrating to anyone to reply to 3 posts at once. I'm replying in order to offer my view of when I was a frustrated newbie (this morning, I think ;-) ). Remember, I was told by a certain forum member that, most certainly, dunbar was a slackware user and the assumption was that he must be nearly expert - yet, I declared, no, I'm not an expert and I freely admit a lack of skills. I was not the one who estimated dunbars skills, Sarah31.
    oh you are soooo subtle in your insults. come on you tell me after hundreds of installs and two years of using linux you don't know anything? find me five green newbies that know how to grep or know to look online for information. personally i and many others here and elsewhere have little time for someone who cries about being a newbie when they obviously aren't.
    what is it some sort of ploy to make people feel sorry for you or shorten your look online for info that you likely could find in two minutes? spare me. up to one year you are a n00b after that you are not.
    I'm definitely not interested in dissing anyone, not you, nor Gyroplast, nor Apeiro, nor hApy .....
    hmmm you care to stand by that or should i pull out several quotes to the contrary?
    I have pointed out that early on, Arch was interested in being Judds perfect distro... did anyone ask him if he ever said that? As I said, I can offer to cut and paste, if you wish.
    so your point is? is this a bad thing? is it not possible for many of us to believe it is the perfect distro for us as well? why not diss yoper for claiming to be THE distro.
    Yet, I'm clearly getting 2 viewpoints in response to me repeating that fact. Thus, in order to push the reader away from their position, so as to get them to walk in my shoes, I post from different directions aiming toward one central condition. Is the issue me, and me alone? Or did the issue exist, and I'm guilty of responding to all viewpoints and thus I'm guilty of pointing it out?
    i have been in your shoes and i often get put back in your shoes when i start to use or investigate applications or areas of linux i have never explored before. so whats your point? if it was to fix up the documentation? that was a goal for some time now in fact a few users have made it an ongoing thing.
    you are not the only one that is a newbie here nor are you the only one here. there are many things that developers must balance when they do their duties. there will never be a distro that will satisfy all a user's needs but i can tell you that the arch team does try to please as many people as possible. so yeah i think you are the issue to some extent. you could have come in here and politely explained what it is that you felt needed improvement but instead you came in and whine and cried that you were so abused and that we had to change to please you. it was all about you anyone can easily extract that from the way you keep flipping between i'm a newbie, i'm not a newbie but i speak for newbies. if you cannot find the offesive comments you have made along the way or see how some people came to the conclusions they did then it is your fault.
    Anyway, you mentioned the ethernet thread.... thydian is evidently new here. Lets explain that issue out loud (since you already raised the matter). I offered to write a document regarding Ethernet setup, I was not shown what to do (frozdsolid posted that they were "pretty sure that's necessary"). I do not assume that every member here reads every posted message; thus, I believe I had read the opinion of someone who was as newbie to Arch as I myself was a newbie (frozdsolids title still shows only 4 posts even today). Nobody here 'handed me an answer' as some might conclude from your post.
    well YOU may not have gotten answer but people DID try to answer your question and, in fact, the answer is there. but you could not extract it or did not know how to ask the question properly to get the result you desired.
    but of course we are the bad guys here because we took the time to try and give you an answer. man you are such a wanker....
    I posted everywhere else on the internet about my situation using IPX/SPX, I heard that it was a dead protocol. I finally found information about IPX/SPX, it was not herein, so the forum was of no use in that instance - that is a fact, sarah31. Now that I have concluded that IPX/SPX was not the best choice and changed the rest of the household over to TCP/IP...... the IPX/SPX issue is no longer the focus, so I dropped the subject; until I was  6 months later, I came back here, saw BluPhoenixs post and was a bit confused. That lead to him suggesting DOSemu, I stated no, that was not preferred, etc. etc. I ultimately thanked BluPhoenix, stated why I was going to drop the issue, and I left the thread cold.
    so why insist on blaming us for something that we tried to answer but was obviously beyond our knowledge? you did it at the end of that thread and you constantly do it here. how many other people did you verbally assault along the way?
    The whole thing got misdirected, away from what I was asking for, as if the topic was no longer my decision alone.
    what a pile of BS. it was YOUR thread so get in there and assert yourself. threads get out of hand sometimes but the original poster can easily get control again if they have a pair.
    i know for a fact that the people he chose to insult would and have tried to help him but he blows them off. i know too that the head developer is VERY open to user contributions yet dunbar chose not to contribute.
    The reasons should be evident by now - when I offered to contribute, I had the time; 6 months of time transpired, I was not able to write because I had no answers with which to generate such a document. I had to revoke the offer. I am taken by surprise that anyone would say I was given the necessary information!
    BS again you just stated that you got your answer (outside of our forum) so you could have easily posted back with what you had found out and then provided documentation later. and you mean to tell me that you have not had time in the last six months to wing something together. shit you have practically written a novel here.
    it is obvious to me that you just want to guard that knowledge and us it to flame and troll here. once you had the answers you were sure to come back and flame that thread and continue flaming on a regular basis. what an ass.
    I've known you to be patient, sarah31 (and you are yet teaching me as I write), but when you say I'm taking great pains to insult someone - while I'm waiting months for forum responses and I'm reading internet documents that are obsolete and these are docs which talk about a different distro, refer to a different kernel, puts files in a different location????
    yeah so you waited for an answer and didn't get one...it happens. you stated that barely anyone knew the answer. fianlly you got one and then came back and rudely blamed us for poor documentation and a barrel of other things. nice guy.
    all i saw was orelein answer you in a nice and proper fashion and you called him eliteist. you also were rather rude about judd in your first post in the future thread. so yes i see all throughout attempts to belittle and brate and not one instance of sober commentary from you.
    and here you are again balming us for online docs that are not ours.
    That is not appropriate, ever, to assume that the newbie will not find older docs and will know enought to discard the incorrect ones.
    this is not limited to newbies.....it can definitely be difficult finding what you need online.
    And since most internet docs are coasting along since, for example, 1999 (re: the IPX/SPX how-to)
    well if you are checking out and obscure problem that is actually now obsolete then sure the fucking doc will be old but you make is sound like ALL docs are old. so i have to assume that you are very much an idiot because i have found most documentation for most current issues to have current docs. most applications will upgrade their docs as they upgrade or do you even notice that? are you to self absorbed to go around and find out if your wild accusations actually have any merit?
    once again, and I'll ask this, and directly of you, sarah31, why would any newbie assume that 4 year old document applied to their situation??
    well knowing how many newbies are i would expect them to ask if docs are relevant. or they could possibly look into some of the information. if it was not producing answers...wow i think they would ask for help again. shit do you even pay attention to how newbies act on justlinux?
    :oops: I'd ask that people remove useless web documents, but I fear that I'd get only 4 responses. That is reality, not sarcasm.
    hmmm remove docs, add docs which is it? fyi arch removes most docs except in rare circumstances. if those docs are html they are html. if a n00b doesn't know how to view them i expect they would ask( that is if they are outside x).
    dunbar...stick with slack because arch will never please you. slack is a very nice distro that should have the balance arch does not afford you. that is the great thing about a linux .... if you don't like one flavour then try another. just don't go back to the ice cream dealer and berate him for selling you your choice...get the point (if you don't then fine i expected that)

  • How can I post the screenshot in my topic in this forum?

    <p>Dear Expert:</p><p>I want to load the screenshot in my topic which I posted to this forums. I just copy and paste the screenshot in the topic body when I edited, and I can see it when I edited. But after I submit to post it to the forums, the screenshot disappear.</p><p>Could anyone tell me how to post the screenshot or picture to the forums and others can view it? It&#39;ll be helpful for me to describe problem clearer and others understand it clearer.</p><p>Many thanks for your help!</p><p>Steven</p>

    <p>I created a Flickr account and uploaded my screenshots there. Then I insert the URL to the picture. I believe that you have to change the input format to allow HTML tags as well. Unfortunately, you may not have permissions to do all that...I am not sure. In any case, you can insert the link to your flickr picture and we can navigate to it. </p><p>Regards,<br />Sean Johnson (CR4E Product Manager) <br /><br /> <a href="http://www.eclipseplugincentral.com/Web_Links-index-req-ratelink-lid-639.html">Rate this plugin @ Eclipse Plugin Central</a>          </p>

  • Concurrent processing of POST requests and automatic flushing of the servlet response buffer in WLS6.1.

              Hi all,
              I encountered the following 2 servlet problems in WLS 6.0/ 6.1:
              1. Processing concurrent POST requests
              WLS seems to disallow concurrent executions of any servlet's doPost servlet method.
              When two clients attempt to send a request to a servlet using POST, the socond
              one
              is blocked until the first customer is served. In essence, the servlet ends up
              operating in
              1-user mode. I just learned from Jervis Liu that the problem is solved in WLS6.0
              if you disable http-keepalive.
              For WLS 6.1 a partial workaround is to make the servlet work in a single-thread
              mode (by implementing the javax.servlet.SingleThreadModel interface). In this
              case,
              WLS dispatches concurrent requests to different instances of the servlet.
              This doesn't completely eliminate the problem - still only one customer can be
              connected at a time. The improvement is that once the first customer is disconnects,
              the second can be served even if the doPost method for the first has not finished
              yet.
              2. Flushing the response buffer in WLS 6.1
              The servlet response buffer is not flushed automatically until doPost ends, unless
              you
              explicitly call response.flushBuffer(). Closing the output stream doesn't flush
              the
              buffer as per the documentation.
              I see that other people are experiencing the same problems.
              Has anyone found any solutions/workarounds or at least an explanation.
              Any input would be highly appreciated.
              Thanks in advance.
              Samuel Kounev
              

    Thanks for replying. Here my answers:
              > Did you mark your doPost as synchronized?
              No.
              > Also, try testing w/ native i/o vs not ... is there a difference?
              With native I/O turned off I get a little lower performance, but the
              difference is not too big.
              Best,
              Samuel Kounev
              > Peace,
              >
              > --
              > Cameron Purdy
              > Tangosol Inc.
              > << Tangosol Server: How Weblogic applications are customized >>
              > << Download now from http://www.tangosol.com/download.jsp >>
              >
              > "Samuel Kounev" <[email protected]> wrote in message
              > news:[email protected]...
              > >
              > > Hi all,
              > >
              > > I encountered the following 2 servlet problems in WLS 6.0/ 6.1:
              > >
              > > 1. Processing concurrent POST requests
              > >
              > > WLS seems to disallow concurrent executions of any servlet's doPost
              > servlet method.
              > >
              > > When two clients attempt to send a request to a servlet using POST, the
              > socond
              > > one
              > > is blocked until the first customer is served. In essence, the servlet
              > ends up
              > > operating in
              > > 1-user mode. I just learned from Jervis Liu that the problem is solved in
              > WLS6.0
              > >
              > > if you disable http-keepalive.
              > >
              > > For WLS 6.1 a partial workaround is to make the servlet work in a
              > single-thread
              > >
              > > mode (by implementing the javax.servlet.SingleThreadModel interface). In
              > this
              > > case,
              > > WLS dispatches concurrent requests to different instances of the servlet.
              > > This doesn't completely eliminate the problem - still only one customer
              > can be
              > >
              > > connected at a time. The improvement is that once the first customer is
              > disconnects,
              > > the second can be served even if the doPost method for the first has not
              > finished
              > > yet.
              > >
              > > 2. Flushing the response buffer in WLS 6.1
              > > The servlet response buffer is not flushed automatically until doPost
              > ends, unless
              > > you
              > > explicitly call response.flushBuffer(). Closing the output stream doesn't
              > flush
              > > the
              > > buffer as per the documentation.
              > >
              > > I see that other people are experiencing the same problems.
              > >
              > > Has anyone found any solutions/workarounds or at least an explanation.
              > > Any input would be highly appreciated.
              > >
              > > Thanks in advance.
              > >
              > > Samuel Kounev
              =====================================================
              Samuel D. Kounev
              Darmstadt University of Technology
              Department of Computer Science
              DVS1 - Databases & Distributed Systems Group
              Tel: +49 (6151) 16-6231
              Fax: +49 (6151) 16-6229
              E-mail: mailto:[email protected]
              http://www.dvs1.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de
              http://skounev.cjb.net
              =====================================================
              [att1.html]
              

  • Small Differences posted to the same profit center

    Hello dear all,
    My problem is following:
    User post a document via MIRO.
    This document generated an accounting entries. All line are posted with profit center 1000 except one line was posted with profit center 2000.
    This is because the MM small differences (customizing in automatic psoting in FBKP) are customized to be posted to the account 658000.
    In OKB9, the account 658000 is linked to the cost center C0ZZ001 and the cost center COZZ001 is linked to the profit center 2000 in his master record and it's not possible to remove/change it since there transactions already posted in FI.
    That's why the system post automatically the differences with profit center 2000.
    User don't accept this and i don't have idea how to resolve this issue, since small differences should be posted always to the same G/L account.
    My question is: Is there a possibility to let system take always the profit center of the invoice for all lines ?
    Thank you in advance

    Hello Tarek
    Option 1
    When posting the original transaction you can replace the profit center 2000 with Profit center 1000 by over writing.
    Option 2
    You can repost the small difference amounts from Profit center 2000 to 1000 using transaction 9KE0.
    Option 3
    You can reallocate the 2000 small difference amounts to relevant profit center 1000 using distribution cycle. Transaction:4KE5
    Thanks
    Prasad

  • How to create a proxy that accept requestes get/post in the same time?

    Hi everybody,
    I have two questions with Service Bus 11gR1.
    I have to create a proxy in https that accept request get/post in the same time, also this proxy should be able to recognize the common name of the certificate.
    Is it possibile?
    Thanks a lot.
    Ettore

    The approach I mentioned is part of correctly configuring client cert authentication. For client cert authentication to succeed weblogic expects the user derived from the certificate by the user name mapper class to exist ( just exist , it wont check the password) in its security realm. The problem you have mentioned is common for any type of 'authentication' and not just specific to this approach.
    The user name mapper class can be configured to accept any attribute in the certificate DN as the mapped user. Since the thread starter is interested in CN, then he has to set CN as the mapping attribute.
    Edited by: atheek1 on Nov 10, 2010 1:33 AM

  • Since uploading to 6.0 I cannot play any games on Facebook as it does not allow me to post to wall, send requests or even open half the games yet IE will work still, why is this happening?

    We installed Firefox 6.0 yesterday [Aug 17th] on our computer. Since that time I have had serious issues with trying to play the games on FACEBOOK. The system will not allow me to send out friend requests, post to the wall and for the flash type games those won't even load at all.

    Oh no... NOT THE 99-PAGER!!! Anything but THAT!!!

  • Screen size in windows 8.1 - all icons too small! How do I enlarge the entire captivate 8 screen?

    The entire Captivate 8 screen to too small. How do I enlarge the entire window? All icons and thumbnails are 1/4 the size they should be. Using Windows 8.1.

    It looks like it is an issue between Adobe and Microsoft. (Many Adobe programs are responding this way to Windows 8 and 8.1)
    I am posting this to try and get some (ANY) ideas/feedback...but to also bring it to the Captivate Community attention. I hope the Captivate Staff is aware of this issue.
    Same issue -great PhotoShop screenshot Photoshop too small on windows 8.1
    Photoshop CC / Windows 8.1 HiDPI / Retina scaling support
    Re: Adobe suite HiDPI on Windows 8.1
    Right side menu too small font size of letters in Windows 8.1 High DPI screen
    Re: Photoshop CC / Windows 8.1 HiDPI / Retina scaling support
    there are many many more out there......
    I tried this first, it comes with Windows and changes your display properties by application: (but it didn't work)
    The program above basicly edits these settings (you can get to these by right clicking on the exe application) I tried many combos, an even tried them under the "change for all users" setting.....NADA!
    I have tried editing the Windows display settings: (all screen shots below are with this setting size)
    The screenshot below is at 250%. It does not make any difference in the application (check out the menu bar, properties, icons....) If I go over 150% I lose dialog box space...the buttons disappear! If I keep it at 150% the words "Advanced Actions" at the top of the dialog box shrinks slightly, enough to fit the buttons in...) I showed the difference using snag it (12 pt arial compared to the appearance of the UI ~ 4 pt.) This is so hard to see! Same issue in some of the other adobe applications. (fyi...they are all up to date)
    Photoshop = same problem
    Dreamweaver = working fine
    Flash = working fine
    Premier Pro = half working....(menubar is ok but everything else is real small)
    Muse = not working
    Adobe Edge Code = Working fine
    OOF! Well, any thoughts anyone? I appreciate any and al feedback and ideas!!!

  • Request for Reverse Posting

    Hi,
    Request for Reverse Posting - can anyone explain me this in detail with example.
    Regards,RAMU.

    Hi Ramu,
    In an Infocube we can delete data in three ways,
    1) Entire Data deletion
    2) Selective data deletion
    3) Deletion based on request ID.
    After compression of Infocube, request ids become zero and data gets aggregated and moves from F fact table to E fact table, so we can delete data only in two ways
    1) Entire Data deletion
    2) Selective data deletion.
    But if it is required  to delete data in Infocube after compression based on Request Id, we can go for Reverse Posting. We can reverse post the data only when we process the data through PSA.
    If u  reverse post the data for a compressed request, the data for the compressed request is taken from PSA multiplying with
    -1 for the key figure values and loaded into the data target. Now the data in the data target  is available in F table with negative key figure values. By Compression of Info Cube, data moves from F table to E table and nullifies the data in Infocube for the request ID.
    Note: Since records with zero key fig values are of no use, to delete these records while compression check mark  zero elimination option in collapse tab.
    Hope It helps u
    Cheers....
    Sk Babu

  • Request for Quote IN SAP SCRIPTs

    Request for quote in SAP Scripts
    Do any one was modified MEDRUCK layout??
    Please let me know ,which elements
    do they people used??
    thank you

    Hi Silpa,
       You needn copy the MEDRUCK Script for your specific purpose. You can create your own script for your purpose. Its not necessary that you have to copy the original one and proceed.
    Link:
    http://www.sap-img.com/sapscripts.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/d6/0db74a494511d182b70000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
    Reward if helpful.
    Regards,
    Tushar

  • Claims authentication: "Server was unable to process request. --- Index was outside the bounds of the array"

    Hi there,
    I recently got a peculiar error when users tried to log-in into a SP 2010 portal using claims based authentication.
    The following error is logged in the event viewer of the SP server in question:
    Event ID 8306 - Claims authentication
    An exception occurred when trying to issue security token: Server was unable to process request. ---> Index was outside the bounds of the array.
    I also found an IIS warning entry with a similar message:
    Event ID 1309 - Web Event
    Exception type: FaultException
    Exception message: Server was unable to process request. ---> Index was outside the bounds of the array.
    I simply could not find an answer to why this happened, but an iisreset seemed to have fixed the issue. I was wondering if anyone here would know a possible root cause for this issue?
    Thanks in advance for your help.
    Regards,
    P.

    Hi,
    Thanks for posting your issue, Kindly browse below mentioned URLs to fix this issue
    http://underthehood.ironworks.com/2011/05/sharepoint-2010-an-exception-occurred-when-trying-to-issue-security-token-the-server-was-unable-to-p-1.html
    http://nearbaseline.com/blog/2011/01/claims-exception-occurred-issuing-a-security-token/
    I hope this is helpful to you, mark it as Helpful.
    If this works, Please mark it as Answered.
    Regards,
    Dharmendra Singh (MCPD-EA | MCTS)
    Blog : http://sharepoint-community.net/profile/DharmendraSingh

  • How to reverse the Credit memo in AR if it's created and posted into the GL

    Hi All,
    Can any one suggest on below issue:-
    If i have created a credit memo in AR and posted into the GL also. but after that i realizse that i have made a wrong entry now i want to rectify the errror .
    How do i rectify the entry if i created Credit memo in AR and it' posted into the GL also. Now want to resverse it. ?????????
    regards
    Sujeet

    Hi Sujeet,
    Please have a look, if the process suggested below is of any help:
    Subject:      How To Unpost Transactions in AR
         Doc ID:
    Note:219307.1     Type:      HOWTO
         Last Revision Date:      29-DEC-2005     Status:      PUBLISHED
    •     goal: How to unpost transactions in Accounts Receivable
    •     Goal: How to unpost a batch transferred from AR to GL
    •     Fact: Oracle Receivables
    •     Fact: Oracle General Ledger
    •     Fact: ARGLTP - General Ledger Transfer Program
    •     Fact: ARGCGP - Clear GL Interface Table
    Fix:
    Run the concurrent program ARGCGP to unpost (reset the posted status) for the
    Affected AR transactions.
    1. Verify the following before running ARGCGP.
    - The AR period affected is open
    - The correct posting_control_id is identified. Otherwise, running
    the program will make the problem worse by allowing data to be
    posted twice.
    - The batch has not been imported/posted to the GL
    (N) As GL Superuser, Navigate, Journals, Enter
    Query up batch name %<posting_control_id>%
    - The transactions cannot be found in the GL_INTERFACE table
    2. To run the program, it should be setup as a concurrent request.
    Note: The program can be run from the Unix command prompt however
    it will not pickup _ALL tables in a multi-org environment.
    - System Admin Responsibility: Concurrent > Program > Define
    - Query ARGCGP (as the short name)
    - Click 'Copy To'
    Give it a new program name and short name
    For example: ARGCGP-Reverse AR Posting
    - Click on Use in SRS
    - Save
    - Click on Parameters
    - Enter these parameters and save:
    Seq Paramater Valueset Default Value Required Display
    4 Set of Books id AR_SRS_SET_OF_BOOKS_ID Constant yes yes
    5 Posting_control_id 20 Characters yes yes
    6 Reset_gl_pst_date 6 Characters Constant Y yes yes
    7 del_gl_interface 6 Characters Constant Y yes yes
    8 debug_flag 6 Characters Constant N yes yes
    Description of Parameters
    - set_of_books_id = The ID for the book posted from AR
    - posting_control_id = the unique id for the original posting run from AR
    to GL. Can be identified by querying the
    AR_POSTING_CONTROL table if value is not known.
    - reset_gl_pst_date = (Y)es or (N)o flag to indicate if records in AR
    marked as posted should be reset so that they are
    postable again
    - del_gl_interface = (Y)es or (N)o flag to indicate if records for this
    posting_control_id should be deleted from
    gl_interface table
    - debug_flag = (Y)es or (N)o flag to put additional debug
    information in the log file
    3. Add the new program to Revenue Recognition Request Group.
    - Security > Responsibility > Request
    - Query up Group Revenue Recognition, Application Oracle Receivables
    - Add a new line
    - Report and from LOV choose ARGCGP-SRS
    - Save
    4. Change the user's responsiblity to Receivables User and run the process.
    5. Rerun the GL Interface.
    * WARNING: Before updating any tables in SQL*Plus,
    * perform a BACKUP of the affected tables.
    Additional info:
    When you cannot enter any parameters under point 2, please check if there is
    clicked on Use in SRS.
    Thanks
    Manish Jain.

  • How did this post contradict the TOS?

    I have already tried sending an email to [email protected], but received no reply. I couldn't find any other point of contact for questions about the discussions forum, so here is my question which I'm hoping one of the moderators here can answer:
    Dear Apple,
    I received this email from you recently and decided to go ahead and read your terms of service. I am confused as to what part of your TOS I am not conforming to with my post?
    Furthermore, when I wanted to make a query about this matter, I was shocked to find there is no publicly available e-mail support for Apple. If I have any questions/complaints in future about how the Communities forum is managed, where should I direct these questions?
    Regards,
    xxxxx
    - Hide quoted text - 
    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: <[email protected]>
    Date: Tue, May 3, 2011 at 6:23 PM
    Subject: Apple Support Communities - Post Removed by Host
    To: xxxxxxxxxxx 
    Dear xxxxxxxx, 
    Recently you made a post to Apple Support Communities that discussed inappropriate activities. We have removed your post, titled "How do I download torrents on iPad 2?" which is included for your reference below. Please take a moment to read your post as well as our terms of use at https://discussions.apple.com/static/apple/tutorial/tou.html. We encourage you to use these forums as a resource, and we ask that you keep your post within the terms of use. 
    Best Regards,
    Apple Support Communities staff ++++++++++ A copy of your message for reference: I can't find anything in the app store. Is there any inbuilt functionality in one of the apple applications? Or is there an app that can do this for me? This message is sent from a send-only email account. Any replies sent to this address are deleted automatically by the system.

    This is a guess, but I don't think the problem with the post was that it asked about torrents per se, but rather that it asked about downloading them to an iPad rather than to a Mac.
    If you do a forum search for torrents, and even a search for downloading torrents you will see many hits for prior posts on various Mac boards, all permitted by the hosts. As has been mentioned, torrents are legal, and have legitimate uses as well as being used by software pirates.
    I think that the difference may be that use of a torrent client by a Mac computer does not involve any violation of the operating system EULA - Mac OS X natively supports this software. And also, of course, a Mac user is free to obtain legal 3rd-party software without going through Apple.  The iPad's iOS however, is normally a "closed" system, with all software required to come via the App Store. Trying to get around this restriction is a EULA violation, and the offending post may have been interpreted as such an attempt. To me, though,  the question as worded seemed innocent:
    I can't find anything in the app store. Is there any inbuilt functionality in one of the apple applications? Or is there an app that can do this for me?
    I think this could have been answered by someone simply saying "No, Apple doesn't allow downloading torrents on iOS devices" rather than by removing the question altogether.

  • Fastpath and other request regarding 21CN.

    First of I'll just post my stats to get it out the way.
    *Regarding the screenshot I'm not sure why it's saying I've been connected for 2 hours? I've been playing an MMO for the past 4-5 hours and never had any break in connection or disconnections?*
    I'd like to change to fastpath and if so is there any way to stick the connection to fastpath permanently? As I prefer the 10-15ms ping rather than the 30-40ms.
    Also here's the BTW Test thing.
    Also I've noticed I'm only syncing on ADSL1 or Max or whatever it's called. Is there anyway to change this without buying another router? I know my download speed won't benefit at all and will probably decrease slightly but I currently have another Phonline into my property that's on ADSL2 (Not 2+) and is getting 700-800kbps upload instead of the 448kbps that I'm capped at on this line.
    Any information, advice, help would be nice.
    Cheers.
    If you felt my post was informative and helpful then please click the star below my name/avatar.
    Cheers!
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    your conenction has dropped hence why the 2hrs connection time - it may have been quick in reconnecting but it has dropped.  you need to show a longer conenction period to show how stable conenction before you will get manually moved to fast.  if the exchange saw your line that good it would move you automatically
    you cannot get fixed on fast
    check your exchange and see if 21CN enabled - there is no need to change router normally to get adsl 2/2+
    check exchange here
    If you like a post, or want to say thanks for a helpful answer, please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side of the post.
    If someone answers your question correctly please let other members know by clicking on ’Mark as Accepted Solution’.

  • Error 2148074306 The encryption type requested is not supported by the KDC

    Our domain is Windows 2008 Native. I ran repadmin /replsummary and noticed an odd error that I cannot get to the bottom of. Error 2148074306 The encryption type requested is not support by the KDC. This appears between two DCs only. I cannot find any reference to what might be causing this.Orange County District Attorney

    Hello,
    check this articles about:
    http://blogs.technet.com/ad/archive/2007/11/02/server-2008-and-windows-vista-encryption-better-together.aspx
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/winserverDS/thread/9fe02655-bab9-43e4-9776-7b318b582e19
    http://blogs.technet.com/ad/archive/2007/02/23/aes-authentication-in-vista-keep-in-mind-if-you-re-testing-vista.aspxBest regards
    Meinolf Weber
    Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers
    no rights.

Maybe you are looking for

  • HP Officejet 6500A Plus-Scan won't work

    I have a 6500A Plus and I can't get my scan to work. It prints from the computer and I can fax, but when I go to scan it doesn't recconize the computer. I went to the front page and clicked register to scan and it said that it already was and there w

  • TS3991 A Pages document in the cloud corrupt - any chance of recovery?

    I have been using Pages on my iPad with iCloud syncing enabled, it worked reasonably well for me until today. When I tried to access one of the documents on my Mac and download it from iCloud.com, I got a notice that there is some sort of version con

  • Check box in bsp page.

    hi experts. i  m new to bsp. i  want to fetch one field from a ztable  with check box may be  possible field  have more than 4 values. checkbox1           .... value1 checkbox2          ..... value2 checkbox3          ..... value3 checkbox4         

  • Infix vs Touch Up Tool

    Just an FYI, for any of you who are struggling with the Text Touch Up Tool when the text is oddly linked between different blocks, give Infix a try.  Infix is an excellent PDF editor that my company uses at times for pdf reporting needs.  Monthly, it

  • Can't update ibook g3 running 10.4.11

    hello I have an ibook g3 running 10.4.11 and i want to update it but when I download the updater from the apple web site it gives me an error and says I cant continue. I need help Thanks