Smart Collection on a single keyword in Lightroom4

Hi
I´m having some trouble figuring out this one:
I have twins, a boy and a girl. I take a lot of photos of them. I want to make a smart collection for each of the kids separately as well as of photos of them together. There are also lots of photos of them with grandparents and aunts and uncles. I keyword all my photos with who is in them. Is there a simple way to make a Smart Collection for ONLY one keyword. Say one collection for BOY and one for GIRL, i know i can specify all the nots and so on but i would like to say; make smart collection on photos that ONLY have this one particular keyword. Is this possible?
Thank you!
Frode

Robs suggested solution is simple and effective of course, but if I’ve understood correctly could something like this work…
have a keyword “FriendsAndRelatives” (non-export) which “contains” the Keyword names of all your friends and relatives and your Boy and Girl Keywords sitting outside this say under a Keyword “Twins”.
ie
FriendsAndRelatives  (non-exported)
Relative1
Relative2
etc
Friend1
Friend2
etc
Twins (non-exported)
BoysName
GirlsName
I think you can then do interesting Smart collections such as …
Keywords Contains BoysName
AND NOT Keywords Contains GirlsName
AND NOT Keywords Contains FriendsANDRelatives.
Or…
Keywords Contains BoysName
AND Keywords Contains GirlsName
AND NOT Keywords Contains FriendsANDRelatives.
Etc etc
I may have missed the point though, if so … sorry!
Alan.
PS - As an interesting example, I have an Animals Heirarchical Keyword tree which contains a tree of classifications 5 levels deep.
I can create a smart collection which shows all my non-bird wildlife as ...
Contains "Animal" AND Does not contain "Bird" and Does not Contain "Domesticated".

Similar Messages

  • Better filtering for smart collections - by number of keywords

    There is a nice feature for smart collections that allow filtering keywords by "are empty" and "aren't empty"
    I would like to filter keywords by X number of keywords.
    It's great to have a collection that tells me that there are no keywords but if I add only one keyword I then have to find the image by that keyword.
    As a work flow this doesn't work great. I want to start with images with no keywords, then work through images with 1 keyword and 2 etc. To continue the process you would also need to remove the images from the smart collection (like remove from collection for standard collections) being able to remove the image from collection of has only 3 keywords should apply also to has 4 keywords etc. This way if you have an image that only needs 1 keyword you don't have to remove the image from every progressively higher amount of keyword collections.

    Great, you are going to make me move my lazy behind and find it for you, aren't you? You owe me...
    One Song From Each Artist in Playlist
    http://www.dougscripts.com/itunes/scripts/scripts06.php?page=1#onesongfromeach
    or
    http://tinyurl.com/2etkj4
    Actually now that I read the description more carefully, I am not sure if that works out of the same library or if it instead works out of other playlists.
    Patrick

  • Smart collection - stacked pictures & parent keywords

    Hi everyone!
    I'm playing around with smart collections and am wondering it there is a possibility
    - to filter for stacked photos and / or the first (front) picture of a photo stack...
    - to filter for a parent keyword that is not attributed itself - it should show all the pictures with the respective child keywords (but not pictures with other keywords that might contain part of the parent keyword); or more simply put - filter just the way that would happen when you press the -> arrow next to a keyword in the keyword browser
    Thanks for any inputs.

    cyber-r wrote:
    Hi everyone!
    I'm playing around with smart collections and am wondering it there is a possibility
    - to filter for stacked photos and / or the first (front) picture of a photo stack...
    - to filter for a parent keyword that is not attributed itself - it should show all the pictures with the respective child keywords (but
    Not possible with Lr's built in smart collections options, but there may be third party plug-in around that support what you're asking for. Try a search on Adobe Lightroom Exchange http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/exchange/index.cfm?event=productHome&exc=25

  • Smart Collection malfunction

    I've checked and triple checked but some of my smart collections are including images that do NOT have the attributes selected.  It is the keywords attribute that is the probelm.  In particular I have this smart collection
    Here are the keywords selected:
    The keyword:  "Tri-Cities_Region" does not exist in these images yet they are included in this smart collection.  I've checked every keyword for their synonyms, not there.  I've restarted LR and my mac.
    MacBook Pro, 2.4ghz, 4 gb RAM, 200gig free space on a 650gb HD.  LR 3.2
    Thanks for any clues.

    According to my keywords "Tri-Cities_Region" has 0 (zero) images with that keyword:
    Yet it still adds images to the smart collection with that keyword, even though no images contain that keyword.

  • Smart Collection Criteria (keywords)

    I'm just starting to create some Smart Collections, which is a nice feature that I'm trying to understand.  I've read some of the tips and tricks, but I'm trying to figure out something:
    I want to create a smart collection that has a particular keyword, but no other keywords.  For example, I may have a bunch of photos with several different keywords, but I want to single out one keyword for the smart collection.  I don't just want photos with that keyword, but photos with ONLY that keyword.  I see you can specify "contains", "contains all", "contains words", "doesn't contain" - but nothing that specifies "contains ONLY".
    So let's say I tag my photos with the names of my kids (we have three of them).  I want to single out photos of just my son, Brandon.  If I do the "contains" criteria, it's going to give me all of the Brandon photos, but also the photos with my other kids in the pictures as well.  I don't see a way to specify that I ONLY want photos with the keyword "Brandon" and no other keywords in the photos.
    Is there a way to do this?  Or am I just not thinking clearly?  ;-)

    You can specify "Brandon", "but not Jason"  "but not Susie."- that'd be all right for your kids, but I have almost no photos with just one keyword. I'd usually have setting or holiday or vacation or something else besides my kid's names in any event. 

  • Smart Collection matching a multi-word Keyword

    I have the following multi-word keywords:
    "through the years"
    "kelly through the years"
    "mike through the years"
    I want to create a smart collection which only matches if the keyword is "through the years".  I do not want the smart collection to match the other two.
    Is this possible?

    I agree that this is a design oversight that should be corrected. However, one could argue that a keyword entirely contained in another should be represented by a hierarchy. While the OP does not make it clear what the relationship is between "through the years" alone and "kelly through the years" it would seem that the concept of "kelly through the years" would be better represented with keyword beneath "through the years" and as such would not need to contain the string "through the years".
    Also the OP states that the keyword "Kelly" exists on it's own and is distinct from "kelly through the years". It is not clear to me why just the keywords "through the years" and "Kelly" could not exist as flat keyword (no hierarchy). To achieve the concept of "kelly through the years" you would apply both. Then a simple AND condition would find the desired images.
    In short I think this is a case of a flawed keyword hierarchy.
    Again I agree that an exact match option should be provided.
    -Josh

  • Smart collection containing matches with only two keywords

    I have added keyword tags to all my photos with the names of the people in the picture.  I then created a smart collection with two names in it.  For example Jessica and Ryan.  That collection then returns all pictures that have Jessica or Ryan in them. I am trying to get pictures than contain both Jessica and Ryan, but not other names.  The only way I have figured out how to do this is by entering in the other names in the doesn't contain field.  That seems like a lot of work when I have many other names, and it must be updated each time I add new keywords.  Is there an easier way?

    There's no way built-in to LR to do what you want without listing every keyword you want to exclude.  The Any Filter plugin lets you do it, though you need to understand boolean expressions.  See the "Exactly one person in the keywords" example for how to match exactly one person. To get exactly two people, you'd define the filter:
    All of
    Explicit Keywords = Ryan
    Explicit Keywords = Jessica
    Explicit Keywords all items
    Some of
    Keyword = Ryan
    Keyword = Jessica
    None of
    Keyword subkeyword of People

  • Smart Collection collecting too many keywords

    I created a smart collection with only one rule - Keywords/Contains/'Landscape' - but many other images that do not contain that keyword appear in the collection. It doesn't happen with any other keyword as far as I know. I tried re-creating the collection, re-keywording my images, etc. but with no success. How can I fix this problem?

    Darbs,
    I suspect that Landscape is a parent keyword for several others. Look in your keyword list to see if that's the case.
    Alternatively, you could set the Keyword Tags entry to "Keywords & containing keywords" to see what's going on:
    Hal

  • Smart collection drop down does not include keywords

    I must have gotten this right once, because I have a smart collection whose only condition is a keyword, which is at the top of the drop down for that collection.  Likewise there is a default smart collection that LR must have created, which is called "without keywords" and whose one condition is that keywords are empty.  However,  every time I try to create a new smart collection, the criteria drop down starts with rating, followed by pick flag, label color, label text, down to the final criteria, "any searchable text" which I understand to be different from keywords, because there is a criteria called keywords.  The same is true of attempts to edit existing smart collections.  Where did my criteria by keywords go?

    That allows you to share the saved criteria to a different catalog or to a catalog on another machine.
    Here is a comprehensive help document:
    http://help.adobe.com/en_US/lightroom/using/WSC9EBC412-9DBB-4a3e-9ABD-4BF0C12CFF0F.html

  • Lightroom 5: Can't make smart collection using keywords?

    I watched a tutorial about how to make smart collections using keywords.
    I spent a couple hours selecting the photos (using the paint can, good tip) and giving about 700 photos the keyword "use".  Then I went to make a smart collection and discovered that it only allows you "any text field" with no reference to keywords.  Many photos in my huge collection have the letters "use" in their titles.
    So is there no way to select keywords as a basis for smart collections????

    Jim Wilde wrote:
    To be honest, I'm still not sure of the purpose/benefit of the change!
    Definitely: to reduce time it takes to scroll from top to bottom .
    Hopefully: to pave the way for additional metadata items in the future .
    R

  • Smart Collection Keyword Problem

    I'm having a problem with smart collections.  I do bird photography and am trying to catalog my bird images.  I created a collection set called Birds, and I created sub-collection sets for various species.  Smart collections by and large do a good job of pulling images into the proper smart collections based upon keywords I've assigned to images.  But I'm having a problem with a couple of keywords.
    I have a collection set called Ducks, and inside I have the different duck species set up as smart collections.  The rules for the smart collection for a given species are simple.  For Harlequin Duck, the rule is: Keywords, Contains Words, Harlequin Duck.  All of my Harlequin Duck images are correctly pulled into that smart collection.  But if I try to create a smart collection called Long-Tailed Duck using the same rule structure, no images show up.  The same goes for the smart collection called Wood Duck: no images are pulled into the smart collection.  However, if I change the rule for Long-Tailed Duck to: Keywords, Contains All, Long-Tailed Duck, all of the images appear in the smart collection.  This also works for the Wood Duck collection.  If I look at the Keyword list on the right of the screen, both of the problem keywords are there and you can see the correct number of images next to the keyword.
    Am I doing something wrong, or is this a bug?  How can I fix this problem?  Thanks for your help!

    Contains All - Treats the input as multiple "word fragments" and matches any photo that has a keyword that contains all of the "word fragments", even if only in part (i.e. as substring).
    For example: If you have two photos:
    Photo A, with: 'Big Mallard Ducks'
    Photo B, with: 'Small Mallard Ducks'
    Then Contains All:
    'allar uck ig' will match photo A, but not B.
    'allar uck' will match both.
    'Contains Words' is confusing as heck - I took a whack then realized I was wrong. Maybe somebody else can educate us both.
    I just did this test - I have a photo with the keyword:
    'Big Mallard Ducks'
    then Contains Words:
    Big - matches
    Mallard - matches
    Big Mallard - matches
    Mallard Big - matches
    Big Mallard Ducks - does not
    Mallard Ducks - does not
    Ducks Mallard - does not
    Big Ducks - does not
    Ducks - does not
    Straight from the latest help file: Contains Words
    Searches for text that contains all specified alphanumeric sequences as whole words. To find photos with the keyword flower using a Contains Word search, for example, type flower.
    Here's another question for y'all:
    Is 'Contains Words' broken? - I'd have to say it is...
    Rob

  • Problems with "Keywords - contains all" in smart collection

    I imported multiple pictures from a shoot; each has keywords, and they all have a common keyword phrase, say "my common keyword phrase". I created a smart collection with "Keywords" using "contains all" and parameter "my common keyword phrase". It worked as expected - those images were included in the smart collection.
    However, I just imported a new picture that has "my common keyword phrase" in it, and the smart collection is not updated. The smart collection has no other AND or OR triggers.
    I can access all the images with this keyword phrase by accessing them via the keyword list in Library - all the images do show up. But what am I likely doing wrong with the smart collection? I am using LR 4.3.1 under Win7 (64-bit). Thanks!
                    Dilip

    Have you tried deleting the preferences?  See Preference and other file locations in Lightroom 5.  Note that on more recent versions of Mac OS, you should reboot after deleting the preferences, since the operating system can cache them. 
    Sprinkling this magic fairy dust often fixes weird LR behavior.

  • Keyword filtering problem in Smart Collections

    All,
    I’m trying to do create a Smart Collection based on Keywords, unfortunately I can’t seem to get it to work. The criteria is that the collection must contain the keyword phrase “Publish to Flicker & Facebook” but not “Published Image”.
    I’ve tried variations of the following:
    Match all of the fallowing rules
    Keyword doesn’t contain = Published Image
    Keyword contains = Publish to Flickr & Facebook
    This should give me all the images that I want to Publish to the services but have not been published as of yet. If I do either of these separately they work but not together as a filter. FYI I’m using the Beta 3 version. - CES

    That didn't work... even renamed to nonsence words still dosent work

  • Overlapping Keywords in Smart Collections

    I have a bunch of photos keyworded with "Family," others with, "Jones Family," others with "Knight Family." I made a smart collection that adds photos with 4 or more stars and the keyword "Family" to it. The problem with this is that it adds photos with any of the keywords listed above. I want the smart collection to add only photos who have a whole keyword that is "Family", not a keyword with the word "Family" as part of the whole keyword. I don't see an option to "match entire keyword only." My reasoning behind this is that just because the picture has the Knight family in it doesn't mean it has my family in it. I use the keyword "Family" for my own family. Is this doable in Lightroom 3?
    Thank you.

    I was so SHOCKED when I tried to simply put "Anna Haugen" in quotes, which with almost ANY other searching system on the planet will simply force the complete encosed entry to be looked for ... and Lightroom returned "no matching records".
    It is SUCH a simple thing, and so heavily used ... and for crying out loud, PEOPLE HAVE TWO OR THREE NAMES, ADOBE!
    Grrr .... ah well, have a nice day all! And thank you, Kevin, for noting that LR doesn't have this capability at the moment.
    Neil

  • Keyword Based Smart Collections

    I'm having some difficulty. Most of the time keywording is a great way to build smart collections. This time, however, I'm having difficulty. I had a second shooter at my last wedding. When we imported his images, they were all tagged with his name so that I could differentiate if I needed to. Trouble is, now my standard keywording technique is back-firing.
    After building my smart collections for the different parts of the wedding based on keywords (e.g., smart collections for pre-ceremony, ceremony, details, reception and formals), I make one final smart collection that displays images that have no keywords. This way in case I failed to tag some images, I won't miss them. Trouble is, all of the second shooter's images do have keywords. They're tagged with his name.
    So, what I need to do is build a smart collection that looks something like this:
    Show me images only:
    IF the image has NO keyword
    OR
    IF the image is ONLY tagged with THE PHOTOGRAPHER'S NAME
    I've been tinkering with it for a while but there doesn't appear to be any obvious way to do this. Frankly it seems like pretty basic functionality. Even iTunes will do this kind of thing with Smart Playlists. So, can someone give me some direction here?

    Set your smart collection to be
    Keywords Is Empty
    Keywords Contains "The Other Photogs Name"
    And set the match parameters to "Any"

Maybe you are looking for

  • ITunes downloaded to my computer but now it won't open?

    it's saying i need apple support or something? It also says to uninstall itunes, and redownload it. I tried that and it's still not working.

  • Gl query

    hello i want to compare between two periods when i write p.period_name=:n good work >> when compare between two periods no data in this query select M.SEGMENT2, ( M.segment1 || '.' || M.segment2 || '.' ||M. segment3 || '.' || M.segment4 || '.' ||M. s

  • Reg credit memo

    Hi While creating credit memo, in the header details in header tab we have Reference, Assignment feilds whether these are manually entered or automatically picked by the system could any of help me. Thanks, Narsimha Reddy

  • PR/PO Release

    Dear All, Our users have requirement that when Quantity or Value of purchasing document is changed either decreased/increased, document should get unreleased. Please explain whether this can be done with release indicator or any other configuration i

  • Write caching

    When using Windows, enabling or not write caching for an EHD may be important. Is write caching a consideration for EHDs when running OS X? If so, where is the setting selected? I can't find anything about write caching in Disk Utility. Thanks.