SMART FORMS execution time slow

Dear SAP,
We have been applying support packs to our system from last few days.
We have upgraded our ABAP and BASIS level from 10 to 17th Component.
It has been found that TCodes take time to Open for first time after
applying the components. In case of SMART FORMS the execution time
in every process is taking very long. This has been the case for very
long now. Kindly suggest what should be done to speed up the Process of
Working in Smart Forms.
- Jitesh
( Basis )

Hi Njitesh,
After Upgrade you should run SGEN ( SAP Load Generator ), which will execute all the transactions once and makes the system faster.
Run the SGEN in the background mode, usually it takes a long time to compile all the objects.
Hope you get the solution.
Thanks
Arbind

Similar Messages

6i form Run-time slow over some Pcs

Dears,
i'm facing problem , i have Form 6i , and over my PC (P4 , 1 GB RAM) taking 25 Sec , but over another PC (i3 core Due, 4 GB RAM) take 110 Sec .
any help

Welcome to the Oracle Forums. Please take a few minutes to review the following:
Oracle Forums FAQ
Before posting on this forum please read
10 Commandments for the OTN Forums Member
How to ask questions the smart way
Following these simple guidelines will ensure you have a positive experience in any forum; not just this one!
user7997888 wrote:
Dears,
i'm facing problem , i have Form 6i , and over my PC (P4 , 1 GB RAM) taking 25 Sec , but over another PC (i3 core Due, 4 GB RAM) take 110 Sec .
any help
What it takes ? form builder ? runtime ? What is OS ? what are the application runs in background ? Are they run from network location ?
What will we say ?
Hamid

Error during dunning smart form execution

Hello Experts,
I have a requirement to develop a smartform for dunning when i copied the standard program 'F150_DUNN_SF' and made some changes to windows and tried executing it.Its throwing me an error 'Printing dunning notices using SMARTFORMS,error during parameter transfer' i am wondering how to find the error. Even in F150 also its showin an error saying 'Form XXX language EN is not active and has no errors'.Please let me know how i can solve this erros.
Thanks,
Vijay Simha CR

Hi,
Did you copied that from 000 client and select the language en.If this is already done then please check the configurations settings.if still there is any issue please post.
Regards,
Madhu.

Smart forms (real time business scenario)

hi all,
can anyone send me the business scenario of smartforms in real time.
i dont know technical specification and functional specification of smartforms
if possible kindly send me to my mail id.. [email protected]
thanx
bhanu.

SAP - SRM > PPOMA_BBP - Attributes in SAP SRM.

Smart Form Very slow

Hi,
I have a problem when i printing a Invoice Smartform it is taking long time for output. Is the form execution is based on his Conditions?
How to speed up the output printing? Pls advise...

Thanks for your reply.
Smartform Intially it run very fast. Now it is getting Slow. This form is TAX Invoice Form. Is this because of data retrieval?
Pls advise...

Slow down printing speed for Smart Forms

Hi,
Is there any command (etc.) to slow down the printing speed of an Hp laserjet when printing a smart forms?
I need that because when I print that smart form to fast I run into print out quality problems.
Many Thanks

hi,
take print out in a dot matrix printer instead of your laser printer without changing any settings.
Coz i tried this once, i was successfull. But, the printout will be very slow.
regards,
kool.

One-Time Customer or Vendor Address Printing in Smart Forms

Hi friends,
I am using the Address Node in Smart Forms to print the Addresses in Tax Invoice Printing. How to get the address details for the One-Time Customers which is stored in the BSEC table using the same Address Function.
(We can directly get the address details from BSEC and display it by using a separate Text Node. But the address formatting according to the recipient country postal standards will be handled only by Address Function in Smart Forms right)
Regards,
Riaz.

Hi friends,
I am using the Address Node in Smart Forms to print the Addresses in Tax Invoice Printing. How to get the address details for the One-Time Customers which is stored in the BSEC table using the same Address Function.
(We can directly get the address details from BSEC and display it by using a separate Text Node. But the address formatting according to the recipient country postal standards will be handled only by Address Function in Smart Forms right)
Regards,
Riaz.

With in smart forms   i need time format like 12:26:37

hi,
in smart forms time format is coming to one variable time in this format 122637, but i need this format 12:26:37
plz tell me the answer.
thanks.

Hi
Check this:
REPORT ztest_time_conv.
DATA: hour(2) TYPE n,
      min(2) TYPE n,
      sec(2) TYPE n,
      tim TYPE i.
DATA: time TYPE p DECIMALS 2.
DATA: timeformat TYPE sy-uzeit.
time = '1.38'.
tim = time * 3600.
hour = tim DIV 3600.
tim = tim MOD 3600.
min = tim DIV 60.
sec = tim MOD 60.
CONCATENATE hour min sec INTO timeformat.
WRITE timeformat.
BREAK-POINT.
PS:Code given by Vijay Babu Dudla in other thread..in ABAP general..when I pasted the link,it did not work..so I am giving it here like this.
Regards,
VIshwa.
Edited by: Vishwa Sri Hari on Nov 5, 2008 1:01 PM

Slow query execution time

Hi,
I have a query which fetches around 100 records from a table which has approximately 30 million records. Unfortunately, I have to use the same table and can't go ahead with a new table.
The query executes within a second from RapidSQL. The problem I'm facing is it takes more than 10 minutes when I run it through the Java application. It doesn't throw any exceptions, it executes properly.
The query:
SELECT aaa, bbb, SUM(ccc), SUM(ddd), etc
FROM MyTable
WHERE SomeDate= date_entered_by_user AND SomeString IN ("aaa","bbb")
GROUP BY aaa,bbbI have an existing clustered index on SomeDate and SomeString fields.
To check I replaced the where clause with
WHERE SomeDate= date_entered_by_user AND SomeString = "aaa"No improvements.
What could be the problem?
Thank you,
Lobo

It's hard for me to see how a stored proc will address this problem. I don't think it changes anything. Can you explain? The problem is slow query execution time. One way to speed up the execution time inside the RDBMS is to streamline the internal operations inside the interpreter.
When the engine receives a command to execute a SQL statement, it does a few things before actually executing the statement. These things take time. First, it checks to make sure there are no syntax errors in the SQL statement. Second, it checks to make sure all of the tables, columns and relationships "are in order." Third, it formulates an execution plan. This last step takes the most time out of the three. But, they all take time. The speed of these processes may vary from product to product.
When you create a stored procedure in a RDBMS, the processes above occur when you create the procedure. Most importantly, once an execution plan is created it is stored and reused whenever the stored procedure is ran. So, whenever an application calls the stored procedure, the execution plan has already been created. The engine does not have to anaylze the SELECT|INSERT|UPDATE|DELETE statements and create the plan (over and over again).
The stored execution plan will enable the engine to execute the query faster.
/>

Slow Execution Time of Exponential Function

Hi,
I am developing a program with large dataset (arrays size of around 1000*1000 elements).
I realised that my program ran quite slow when calculating exponential for each array elements.
So, I built a simple porgram to test the execution time for exponential vs multiplication on 1000*1000 array elements and found
out that the period is ~25 times longer. Attached is the program (Labview 2011).
The specs of my system are:
1) Windows 7
2) Intel i5 3Ghz with 4gb ram
3) Labview 2011
The actual program I built has a version in Matlab and uses exponential function as well. However, the execution time in Labview is around 10 times longer than the Matlab. I believe that the exponential function is the cause of this after making some analysis using built-in "Performance and Memory" tool and modification to the program.
Is there any way I could make the exponential function runs faster? Or any better way to handle large array operation? (I have tested array operations with nested FOR loops and paralel execution but the results is not that great.
Hope anyone can help. Thanks for any input.
Attachments:
Execution Time-Exponential Function.vi ‏11 KB

Thank you for your answer.
I am sorry, I could not upload the real code since it is large and has lots of dependency. But, I wrote simple program both in Labview and Matlab as attached.
I tried to make both program doing the same thing and put each element as random number between 0-1 to avoid any folding/optimization process.
The Labview took around 974ms to complete the task while the matlab 177ms. If the the way I implemented them are correct, the Matlab is around 5 to 6 times faster than Labview to execute Exponential function.
Attachments:
Matlab Exponential Test.PNG ‏19 KB
Labview Exponential Test.PNG ‏24 KB
Exponential Test.vi ‏10 KB

Execution times and other issues in changing TextEdit documents

(HNY -- back to terrorize everyone with off-the-wall questions)
--This relates to other questions I've asked recently, but that may be neither here nor there.
--Basically, I want to change a specific character in an open TextEdit document, in text that can be pretty lengthy. But I don't want pre-existing formatting of the text to change.
--For test purposes the front TextEdit document is simply an unbroken string of letters (say, all "q's") ranging in number from 5 and upwards. Following are some of the results I've gotten:
--1) Using a do shell script routine (below), the execution is very fast, well under 0.1 second for changing 250 q's to e's and changing the front document. The problem is that the formatting of the first character becomes the formatting for the entire string (in fact, for the entire document if there is subsequent text). So that doesn't meet my needs, although I certainly like the speed.
--SCRIPT 1
tell application "TextEdit"
set T to text of front document
set Tnew to do shell script "echo " & quoted form of T & " | sed 's/q/e/g'"
set text of front document to Tnew
end tell
--END SCRIPT 1
--The only practical way I've found to change a character AND maintain formatting is the "set every character where it is "q" to "e"" routine (below). But, for long text, I've run into a serious execution speed problem. For example, if the string consists of 10 q's, the script executes in about 0.03 second. If the string is 40 characters, the execution is 0.14 second, a roughly linear increase. If the string is 100 characters, the execution is 2.00 seconds, which doesn't correlate to a linear increase at all. And if the string is 250 characters, I'm looking at 70 seconds. At some point, increasing the number of string characters leads to a timeout or stall. One interesting aspect of this is that, if only the last 4 characters (example) of the 250-character string are "q", then the execution time is again very quick.
--SCRIPT 2
tell application "TextEdit"
set T to text of front document
tell text of front document
set every character where it is "q" to "e"
end tell
end tell
--END SCRIPT 2
--Any insight into this issue (or workaround) will be appreciated.
--In the real world, I most often encounter the issue when trying to deal with spaces in long text, which can be numerous.

OK, Camelot, helpful but maddening. Based on your response. I elected to look at this some more, even though I'm stuck with TextEdit on this project. Here's what I found, not necessarily in the order I did things:
1) I ran your "repeat" script on my usual machine (2.7 PPC with 10.4.6)) and was surprised to consisently get about 4.25 seconds -- I didn't think it should matter, but I happened to run it with Script Debugger.
2) Then, curious as to what a slower processor speed would do, I ran it at ancient history speed -- a 7500 souped up to 700 MHz. On a 10.4.6 partition, the execution time was about 17 seconds, but on a 10.3.6 partition it was only about 9.5 seconds. (The other complication with this older machine is that it uses XPostFacto to accommodate OS X.) And I don't have Script Debugger for 10.3.x, so I ran the script in Script Editor on that partition.
3) That got me wondering about Script Editor vs. Script Debugger, so (using 10.4.6) I ran the script on both the old machine and my (fast) usual machine using Script Editor. On the old machine, it was somewhat faster at about 14 seconds. But, surprise!, on the current machine it took twice as long at 8.6 seconds. The story doesn't end here.
(BTW, I added a "ticks" routine to the script, so the method of measuring time should be consistent. And I've been copying and pasting the script to the various editors, so there shouldn't be any inconsistencies with it. I've consistently used a 250-character unbroken string of the target in a TextEdit document.)
4) Mixed in with all these trials, I wrote a script to get a list of offsets of all the target characters; it can be configured to change the characters or not. But I found some intriguing SE vs. SD differences there also. In tests on the fast machine, running the script simply to get the offset list (without making any changes), the list is generated in under a second -- but sometimes barely so. The surprise was that SE ran it in about half the time as SD. although SD was about twice as fast with a script that called for changes. Go figure.
5) Since getting the offset list is pretty fast in either case, I was hoping to think up some innovative way of using the offset list to make changes in the document more quickly. But running a repeat routine with the list simply isn't innovative, and the result is roughly what I get with your repeat script coupled with an added fraction of a second for generating the list. Changing each character as each offset is generated also yields about the same result.
My conclusion from all this is that the very fast approaches (which lose formatting) are changing the characters globally, not one at a time as occurs visibly with techniques where the formatting isn't lost. I don't know what to make of SE vs. SD, but I repeated the runs several times in each editor, with consistent results.
Finally, while writing the offset list script, I encountered a couple AS issues that I've seen several times in the past (having nothing specifically to do with this topic), but I'll present that as a new post.
Thanks for your comments and any others will be welcome.

Personalised mail form Vs Smart Form

Hi..
Is there any difference between personalised mail forms and smart form...
which is advanced one..? In CRM which one do we use..what are the advantages of using it..?
regards,
sanjana

HI
Sanjana Pernolised mail form is marketing concept used to trigger emails to target groups In campaign execution where you can customize the mail according to some attributes like Birthday wise etc.. when a marketing company wants to sned a automised mail to shoot on birth day's of all the customers
you can achive this by personalised mails , you can attachmthe contents and send mails to customers, personalised mail depends up on
1.URL link2.Subject3. Attchments4.delivery date of the mail.
IMG>CRM>Marketing>personalised mail
where as smart forms are
SAP Smartforms can be used for creating and maintaining forms for mass printing in SAP Systems. The output medium for Smartforms support printer, fax, e-mail, or the Internet (by using the generated XML output).
Smart Forms
Form Printing in the Internet Age
Smart Forms was introduced in SAP Basis Release 4.6C as the tool for creating and maintaining forms within SAP solutions, such as mySAP CRM, mySAP SCM, mySAP SRM, and mySAP Healthcare, and is already used by numerous customers. Smart Forms provides an easy-to-use graphical user interface which enables you to carry out the crucial tasks of creating and adjusting forms without any programming skills.
Key Benefits of Smart Forms
Smart Forms allows you to reduce considerably the implementation costs of SAP solutions since forms can be adjusted in minimum time.
The process of designing the form and creating the form logic is completely supported by the Form Builder with integrated graphical user interfaces for page design, table design and text. Furthermore, the Form Builder provides a tree structure to navigate through your form description and to determine the main processing order. Of course, drag-and-drop as well as copy-and-paste functions are also included.
Reward Points
Venkat

Smart form vs sap script

hi experts
i have one doubt,
sap script is client dependent and smart form is client independent how?
and why we say it client dependent and independent.

SAPscript are client dependent.
They need to be copied from one client to another for testing. this can be done from SE71->utilities->copy from Client.
For transferring between server as like other objects they need to be transport.
As for smartforms they are client independent and all changes are available at the same time in all clients for execution.
Unlike smartforms, if you want to use or modify a sapscript in a different client you need to copy it from that client or client '000'.
This is applicable to it accessory components like graphics, texts..etc

Limit on a emthod's execution time

Hi,
I'm trying to limit the execution time of a "slow" method, for example read of InputStream. I tried to set the following system proeprties:
System.setProperty("sun.net.client.defaultConnectTimeout", "3000");
System.setProperty("sun.net.client.defaultReadTimeout", "3000");but still, execution time lasts more than 3 seconds. Any idea what can be done?
Thanks in advance,
Alon.

Thanks you both.
Ths might turn out to be a really dummy question, but
how can I get access to the Socket? Here's a snippet
form my code:
URLConnection urlConnection = url.openConnection();
urlConnection.connect();
InputStream in = urlConnection.getInputStream(); How can I setSoTimeout of the Socket?
Thanks,
Alon.You can't. The socket is not exposed for you to fiddle with, in that API. The lack of a timeout feature is an unfortunate omission from the API you're using, as you've probably observed it can lockup indefinitely. I've heard that Java 1.5 may have fixed that class/those classes.

Hi gurus scripts are clint dependent & smart forms are clint indipendent

hi gurus scripts are clint dependent & smart forms are clint indipendent what is the meaning that

SAPscript are client dependent.
They need to be copied from one client to another for testing. this can be done from SE71->utilities->copy from Client.
For transferring between server as like other objects they need to be transport.
As for smartforms they are client independent and all changes are available at the same time in all clients for execution.
Unlike smartforms, if you want to use or modify a sapscript in a different client you need to copy it from that client or client '000'.
This is applicable to it accessory components like graphics, texts..etc
NOTE:
When u execute a smartform it generates the Function Module, which allows u acces the smartform in any cleint
Hope it will make some sense
Reward if helpful
Thanks
Krushna

SMART FORMS execution time slow

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for