Smart Object Resizes after edit

I have a photoshop file I created for a book cover that contains an illustrator smart object -- a rectangular box that I need to periodically change the colors of. When I double click on the smart object it opens in Illustrator and I can edit it. However, when I go back to Photoshop the rectangle updates and enlarges to at least twice the size.
I created the file a couple of months ago and cannot remember for sure how I made the smart object, but no matter what I do I can't get it to maintain its size after editing.
I did place a new version of the rectangle and can get that to work, but since size and positioning is very critical I would feel more comfortable if I could get the original smart object to work.\
Any suggestions?
Jeff

Sorry--CS2 versions of both

Similar Messages

  • Very new to photoshop I am trying to make changes to a photo and set it up as a smart object but after selecting smart object, the checkerboard appears and my photo dissppears

    Very new to photoshop I am trying to make changes to a photo and set it up as a smart object but after selecting smart object, the checkerboard appears and my photo dissppears

    Hello, thank you so much for your response! Here are some screenshots of my steps taken

  • How can I duplicate a smart object and then edit it, without affecting the original?

    I have a vector element from illustrator that I am placing in a tshirt mockup in photoshop. I have the layout essentially how I would like, but I am trying different color variations. I would think to just duplicate the first placement and then edit the color of the resulting copy, but this affects both the copy and the original. I looked into it a bit further, and found that I should try the "replace contents" option under smart objects, and that this would change the copy. So I go back to illustrator, made a copy of the original vector, and then made the color change I had in mind, and then saved it as a separate document that I could then use in replacing the contents of the copied. This however, is still affecting both smart objects!
    I have tried this as both linked smart objects and embedded smart objects without success.
    Ultimately, I simply want to maintain the position of the original layer with the duplicated and edited layers. If you know of a better way, please share!

    I'm on CC on a Mac.
    What 21 is talking about is making some sense.
    I am able to create new smart object via copy, then create a variation on the original file linked in the parent smart object. Then I save that from illustrator with a different file name. Then I go back to photoshop and replace contents of the new smart object, linking it to the newer illustrator file.
    This gets around the problem, but it takes a few more steps than the same thing did it in earlier versions of photoshop.

  • Linked Smart Objects missing after last CC update?

    I had an update come across CC for Photoshop & Dreamweaver yesterday. After applying the update I'm finding that linked smart objects are missing from my File>Place menu. Anyone else having this issue? I had them before & now they are gone. CC shows me as having no updates available. Just checked Photoshop & it's showing I'm back at 14.0.

    Sounds like the updater failed and you are running 14.0.0 again.
    Uninstall and reinstall.

  • "Smart object" message prevents editing layer

    When I create a new layer by placing an image from another file and then try to edit it (like removing the background from an image) I keep getting this message, "Could not complete your request because the smart object is not directly editable."
    What does this mean?

    When you 'place' an object into an exisiting image doument, you are doing so as a 'Smart object' which can not be edited inside the new image.  If you just paste the object instead of placing it, it will do so as an ordinary layer.  If you don't want objects dragged into the new document to be Smart objects, uncheck that option in General Preferences.

  • PS CS3 - Smart Objects resizing when updating resolution! Help!?

    My company has built many multi-layered files using Smart Objects in CS2. When in the past we have made resolution changes to the smart objects and updated them in the parent file, they have stayed at the same size, with only the resolution changing.
    Now, when opening in CS3 and performing the same action, the Smart Objects now re-size to match the parent file's resolution and the height and width changes!
    Has anyone else experienced this?
    It is quite disturbing that this feature has changes since we have come to rely on it in CS2.

    Yes I've tested this in both CS3 and CS4 - you are right, the problem you describe happens in both. Your problem was very well described.
    Duplicating linked layers has always been a little odd in the way it behaves (ever since grouping and nested grouping was introduced) - it seems to be that it can't hold complex linked relationships when duplicating the layers.
    No solution at present I'm afraid

  • Smart objects not updating (CS5)

    I am using CS5 Photoshop and when I try to save edits on an opened smart object (eg. after editing a ‘placed’ photograph) a ‘Save As’ dialog box appears. When I save the edits to the smart object, using the prompted file name, they are not reflected in the master document.
    Can anyone advise what the problem might be? Is the file path between the master document and smart object being lost?
    Thanks for the help.
    Justin

    Yes I am apply layers to a JPEG. So it's solved by flattening the image and saving, but this mean I lose my fiter and masking layers.
    Does that mean the quickest way would be to open the JPEG image before placing, save it as a PSD and then place it?

  • Bug? Camera Raw Smart Object Can't Be Edited

    I have a problem where a raw file placed as a smart object can't be re-edited in CS3. Here's how to replicate the problem:
    1. Open a JPEG or TIFF as a Smart Object (may happen with other file types).
    2. Go to Layer > Smart Objects > New Smart Object via Copy.
    3. Double-click the top smart object and make changes in Adobe Camera Raw.
    You should now be able to hide/show the top layer (the final)
    to see the bottom layer (the original.)
    4. Double-click the top smart object layer to see that it properly opens Camera Raw allowing you to make edits (this works for now but will stop working when we encounter the bug in a moment).
    5. Save the file and close it.
    6. Re-open the file and double-click either of the smart object layers to edit them. Instead of Camera Raw dialog opening, the image in the window changes to the original unedited version. This is a bug and doesn't happen on every image, but it always happens on at least some of my images.
    There have been times when it works, but the next time I open the file it stops working. Some of my files allow editing later without problems. Truly weird. Has anyone else had this problem? Is there a workaround?
    I have applied all updaters, so that means I am using Photoshop CS3 10.0.1 with Camera 4.4.1 on Mac OS 10.5.2. I have also trashed preferences for Photoshop and Adobe Bridge. I've also Purged the Adobe Camera Raw Cache in the Bridge. This happens on both my Mac Pro (3GB RAM) and MacBook Pro (4GB RAM) so it's not just one machine.
    Thanks in advance,
    Dan

    Hi Daniel,
    Stumbled on your post while searching on a similar issue. I'm not sure if I precisely understand yuour problem, but here's my experience when dealing with TIFFs and JPEGs embedded as Smart Objects in CS3...
    If the Smart Object layer contains a TIFF or JPEG that has already been edited and saved in Camera Raw (i.e., the embedded file has Camera Raw XMP metadata in its header), then Photoshop will open the Smart Object's contents in Camera Raw... with one provision. You have to make sure that in your Camera Raw preferences, under "JPEG and TIFF Handling", that both boxes are checked for "Always open JPEG/TIFF files with settings using Camera Raw".
    If those boxes aren't checked, when you try to edit the contents of a Smart Object layer containing a TIFF or JPEG with Camera Raw settings in its header, instead of opening the embedded file for editing, Photoshop seems to simply revert to displaying the layer without the settings applied. I'm unsure whether this is a bug or intended behavior, but it seems to be one of the symptoms you describe.
    On the other hand, if you make a Smart Object layer from a JPEG or TIFF that does not already have Camera Raw settings in its header, Photoshop CS3 will never open that layer's contents in Camera Raw, regardless of what preferences you have checked. Instead, the contents are opened in a separate window as a temporary .psb file. The only way I've found to do Camera Raw editing in these cases is to export the layer, edit the exported file in Raw, and then re-import it via Replace Contents.

  • Smart Objects: How can I prevent resizing when replacing contents?

    There seem to be 2 kinds of smart objects:
    One kind where you can replace the contents, no matter what size it has and it will fit into the bounding box of the smart object which is already there.
    The other kind where this doesn't happen.
    Is there any way to control that behaviour? I found that in older PS-files, replacing contents always made the new content fit into the bounding box, but since CS3, the transformation stays the same which means I have to rescale the smart-object if the content-size has changed.
    Example:
    Imagine a game cover with screenshots on the back side. Now each screenshot is a smartobject.
    All Screenshots are at 640x480 (assumend the standard screen dpi of 72)
    Now I found them in a better resolution (1024x768, also 72dpi) and replace the old ones with "replace content".
    The old photoshop behaviour: Photoshop would fit the larger image to occupy exactly the same area than it's predecessor.
    The new behaviour: The whole Smartobject is enlarged by 160% (not the transformation parameters, the visual appearance.), I have to scale it down to make it fit to the old size.
    And I really wonder about having older and newer Photoshop-Files where these Smartobjects behave differently.
    Now did I miss something in the help section or is there a way to control this behaviour?

    Yes, fortunately, I am a Windows user, but I don't want to start a religious war here And it is also possible to run multiple versions of Adobe products simultaneously under Windows - why shouldn't that be possible? Currently I have CS3 and CS4 and somtimes use CS3 when CS4 is just too buggy to get the job done. Before that I had CS and CS2 on the same machine.
    But I wouldn't keep all versions back to PS 6.0 or CS, that would be a bit too chaotic and I'd had to spend days of installing if I get a new computer. I expect those programs to be a little bit backwards-compatible, so I don't have to use many different versions. And for Photoshop, this is mostly the case. It's just very tiny details like Smart Object resizing that seems to work differently.
    Otherwise I'm really happy that in CS4 I can finally link Masks to smart objects and apply warp and perspective on them, that's a big plus!

  • Why does the Amount slider of Camera's RAW Detail Panel revert to 0 when opening a Smart Object in Photoshop?

    I use CS6 on a Mac running 10.6.8. I edit images in RAW, then covert to a Smart Object for final editing in Photoshop. I've noticed the image in Photoshop is not sharp, and when I check by returning to RAW, I can see that just the Amount slider (Detail Panel) has reverted to 0, but the other sliders are as I have set them.
    Does anyone know what may cause this problem and how to solve it?

    This behavior happens only on Mac desktop computer, not on my Mac laptop running the same CS6.
    After I've edited an ACR file (including sharpening in the Detail panel), I change the file into a PSD Smart Object to complete my edit by clicking on "Open Object". I immediately notice this PSD file is not sharp. If I click on the bottom right of the image icon to return to the RAW file, I find the Amount slider in the Detail Panel has changed from the sharpening amount I gave it, to 0.
    If I do the exact same thing on my laptop (running a duplicate of the same Photoshop CS6), this behaviour does not happen. The image remains sharp as a PSD file, and if I check by returning to ACR, the Amount slider has maintained its setting.
    Anything more you need?

  • Smart objects generate huge ( 10 GB) temp files ??

    Hi folks. I think there's a bug in CS3's smart object handling. Everytime I move (not resize!) a smart object, the temp file's size increases by some 100-200 MB. I easily get over 10 GB just by moving around a single object repeatedly.
    I find that quite weird, given that normal layer moving does not significantly alter the temp file's size. And PS only has to store the smart objects new X and Y coordinates as the object itself does not change. Am I missing something ? Anybody knows what's going on ?

    Converting Smart objects back to embedded layers would be a very useful addition. "Return to layers" would be a good term for it.
    If you are looking for real world examples where this would be useful Chris
    to simplify and bring down the file size of a file that has got out of hand with smart Objects. Some sort of global command "embed all Smart objects" in the layer/smart objects menu would also be useful for this purpose.
    Objects of the same res and profile could then be non-destructively edited by swapping them in and out of smart objects for direct editing within the master document.
    would be particularly useful when for example you need to detach a single instance of a duplicated SO from the others.
    There is sometimes a need to return layers, and adjustments back into the master document to directly modify how they interact with their surroundings in terms of color and masking - for compositing. Its useful for simplicity to have them tucked away as SO's still
    Of course data loss due to resampling, bit depth and modes could be greeted with a warning, perhaps the warning could be contextual "this operation will result in data loss, will decrease file size by 75%, change its mode from LAB, and resample the embedded pixels to 120%".
    What happens to the smart-filters? if they are there, a choice either to rasterise them or abandon them

  • Changing smart object file format

    I've got a great problem with the smart objects in my project:
    I imported some Images (no background) which had the file format 'png'. I just dragged and dropped the files into my current photoshop window. They got imported and then automtically converted into smart objects.
    After that I created a lot of copies of these smart object and transformed them.
    Now I wanted to change one of the smart objects and double clicked on it. But unfortunately the opened file is a png. So it's not possible to save layers in this smart obejct
    Is there any way to change the file format of a smart obejct (like psb/psd)?

    Yes. Open an SO into a doc window/tab, edit it or whatever, do a Save As to PSD (or any other format). It'll be saved into a temporary folder. Close the SO doc window/tab. In the main doc window/tab, right-click the SO's name in Layers panel, pick Replace Contents and select the file you saved in the temporay folder. All instances of the SO will be auto-updated.

  • Smart Object Sampling Technique.

    Hope I named this topic aptly. I'm pretty new to the whole up/downsampling technique thing. In years of web design, I just never had any real need of it.
    However, I ran into the following scenario:
    We have a big PS file full of pixel art & photographs, some of both are smart objects. We'd like to resize a bunch of them, but need bicubic for some, nearest-neighbor for others.
    Is there any way to set sampling techniques for each smart object?
    (If not, where does one post feature requests? ;D)
    Cheers!

    First you need to know th all smart objects are not created equal.  An embedded smart object is a copy of something "Photoshop" can be just about anything Photoshop supports.  A Raw with Raw settings,  A PSD file, A Layer, A layer set etc. Smart Objects can resized two ways. 
    The first way is the re adjust the transform associated with the Smart Object Layer (Ctrl/Command+T).  Transform I believe uses your user id Photoshop preference for interpolation. When a smart object is resized this way Photoshop first renders the pixels for the smart object the resize those pixels like a raster layer using your default interpolation method. Even if the embedded smart object is a vector or text graphic. I guess you could set your Photoshop preference interpolation before doing each transform.
    The second way to resize a smart object is by editing it in Photoshop and use Photoshop Tools.  You do this be double clicking on the smart object icon in the smart object layer in the layers palette. When you do this Photoshop or ACR will open the embedded smart object in Photoshop as a temp work document in ACR the raw file with its current ACR settings applied.   Use the tools approbate to resize.  For example if the embedded smart object was a PSD file use menu Image>Image Size. Check resample the size and interpolation.  Text and Vector layers will be resized using vector graphics or change font size raster layers will be resized using the method you set. When you commit the resize In ACR or use menu File>Save in Photoshop the embedded object in the smart object layer doubled clicked on will be update with the changes you made.

  • Smart Object Bug?

    When I edit Smart Objects in CS5.5 they open in their own window; meaning I only see the smart object in my new window when I chose to edit. In CS6 I am seeing the actual document I made the Smart Object from, as well as the Smart Object when I edit the Smart Object, AND it has its own rounded border that when saved out, does not appear - it is taking that from the original for no reason.
    Windows 7 Pro 64 Bit only. I did not install 32 bit.

    Hi Zeno,
    Thanks for the suggestion. Resetting the temp directory to another location is a good workaround. I was having the same problem with another program, CuteFTP, and changing the temp dir fixed its problem too. I had previously tried running in Compatibility mode, Administrator mode and both together but none of those modes helped.
    It would still be nice to know why Windows 7 denies access to its own temp directory but at least now, I can get back to work.
    Thanks,
    David Salahi

  • Getting the filename of a placed image inside a smart object

    Hi
    I'm wondering if I can get any help with a problem I'm trying to overcome for a friend of mine.
    My friend is a photographer who does a lot of schhols work (pupil portraits) and wants to create a little document similar to this (very simplified) version:
    I'm trying to help him to create a batch process so that he can make this take up much less of his time!
    Here's where I've got to so far. I've created the layout above which is essentially a smart object (from an external file) manipulated in a couple of ways.
    The workflow as I see it at the moment (although I'm wide open to suggestions, and I'm having a bit of Friday brain) is this: I generate an action that replaces the content of the external file with the contents of (each file in his incoming list, sequentially).
    That file then comes back into the layout above and a new (flattened) copy is saved out from there.
    Rinse and rerpeat through the list of incoming files.
    I can just about make that bit happen using actions, but here's what I can't get - the filename of the incoming file (the one that's placed in the smart object). Can I can use a modified version of the AddFileName script to generate a text layer based on the filename of the placed contents in the smart object? Does any of that make sense? I'm reading this back to myself and even I'm not sure! ho ho.
    My lack of logic/coherent sentence structure here is what probably holds me back in any eforts I have made in getting into scripting.
    I'd appreciate any help that could be offered.
    Thanks.
    Fenton

    Ah - alas it sems not to be. I think I am going to have to come up with a different workflow and by extension, solution. My current thinking is that I need to have an input folder for the images to be used in the layout, and an output folder for the results to be saved into, along with the layout.psd (as above) all housed in the same folder. Then I need (help) to write a script that does the following:
    Checks that the layout document is open (that bit is easy enough)
    if(documents.length==0){
       alert("You need to have your layout template open (-layout.psd-)")
    }else{
        // Do next bit here - and what I'm trying to do is described below.
        // Hopefully by typing it out I might start to get it straight in my head
        // Any help with any part of this process is greatluy appreciated
        // I'm trying to learn!
    Then what I think the script needs to do is tocheck the contents of the input folder and find out how many files are in it then set this as a variable, to set the length of a loop, maybe? Or should it load the filenames as an array and work through them sequentially?
    Once that information is established, there is a smart object on the first layer that needs to be updated with the contents of the first file - my thinking s that this is done by the script opening each image, and then copy/pasting into the smart object, merging down (so I don't end up with an enormous multi-layered file). My reason for thinking this would be a good idea would be that I could just run a quick check to make sure that no landscape pics have sneaked in there and if they have, rotate them (which again, is pretty easy as even I could do that bit, too).
    doc = activeDocument;
                if (doc.height < doc.width) {
                  doc.rotateCanvas(90);
                } else {
                  // Carry on
    This will update all of the smart object instances throughout the layout template.
    Then the text underneath the main image needs to be updated with the filename of the file that has been pasted in the smart object, and after that a [flattened] copy saved out to an output folder.
    Rinse and repeat for the remaining images in the input folder.
    Any thoughts?
    Thanks
    Fenton

Maybe you are looking for

  • MAX causes Windows crash

    I installed LabView 7.1 and the additional programs which where shipped with the DAQPAD-6015 on two different computers, both running Windows XP Professional. On one computer everything works fine. On the other computer I have a big problem: when I s

  • Error when trying to launch iTunes! Help!

    Hi! I've tried to seek through the forums to find someone with the same error, but i haven't found anyone. Here's the problem: When i try to launch iTunes I get a Windows Error saying that iTunes har encountered a problem and has to quit. It's that k

  • Replication in Oracle 8i

    Hi, I got a job to configure replication between my two different oracle 8i database. I have worked on oracle but i don't know how can i configure replication. My scenario is that I have two oracle database server both will be master and i want to co

  • Hnadling unit

    Hi Experts , I want to know the Handling unit cycle. Where packing proposal is created with T code. how to create handling unit. what is the importance of packing station ? is this need to be created ?? How to do GR in HU against production order. Ho

  • Configuration of source system

    Hi all, I had a problem with the configuration of source system with bi 7.0 . i wanna know it is same as earlier. can any body help me plz. it urgent Thanks n regards KK