Smart Objects Vector Resizing is Blurry

Hello all,
I was hoping someone could help me out with this. It's driving me nuts.
Basically, I've always used a combination of vector objects converted to smart objects to retain the ability to resize an object within my master comp...but also be able to make changes to the layer within the smart object if need be. Basically, the primary purpose of a smart object
However, lately, when I convert a VECTOR object to a smart object and increase it's size, the image becomes blurry. Any idea why this is happening? I've linked to a video clip i made to help demonstrate the issue below.
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3645/smartobject.mov

I appreciate the reply...but this has always worked in the past. Even with more complex layers.
If you think it worked in the past, its probably because you had an Illustrator Smart Object. Using Illustrator Smart Objects is the only way you can get genuine vector scaling to work, so that its completely lossless when you rescale.  Photoshop vectors only rescale based on the resolution of the child document.
In the case of your example, you can sort out the problem by opening the Smart Object, upscaling it, and saving. You will then have to go back to the master document and transform the object down again by the same proportion.

Similar Messages

  • Smart Object Masks resizing problems

    I have encountered a problem with the masks I use on smart object layers resizing so that they only extend to the bounds of the image they are masking in photoshop cc. The problem occurring is that many times the mask is 1px too small, and leaves a hairline border of the masked image visible. This seems to be happening when the smart object is saved/updated or resized. One work around is placing this smart object in a group and then masking that group, but this is not an ideal way to organize my files and is not always applicable. I am trying to see if leaving the mask unlinked stops this behavior, however this is still not an ideal fix. Is anyone else experiencing this or knows of a preferences setting/solution etc. to fix this issue?  Thanks.

    Can you post a file that exhibits the behavior? (Dropbox or another sharing site)

  • Vector smart object from AI is blurry

    I am storing design elements as Vector Objects in Illustrator so that I can update them quickly when needed. The issue is that they vector objects, when viewed inside of photoshp, are quite a bit more blurry than the photoshop equivalent. Any ideas why?
    I understand that the Smart Object is rasterized. Do I need to do something to my photoshop document to view it in its final rendered state? Photoshop elements are rasterized as well, so i am not sure what is going on.
    In the attached pic, the top element is from illustrator, while the bottom is the same thing made inside photoshop. thanks.

    thanks for the reply. My document is 320x240 because that will be the final UI size.  I made sure both documents are 320x240.  The issue is that the native photoshop element is more fine RELATIVE to the illustrator file.  They are both 320x240, so they should both look the same, right?
    In the photoshop file I also had a specific image size of something like 3.5 inches by X.X inches, so the actual pixel ratio is 70.5 i think.  I could not find out how to specify the image size (in inches) for the illustrator file, so that document is actually be 72 pixels.  Perhaps this is part of the issues. However, by this rational the illustrator file should be more fine, not less...

  • Updated Illustrator smart object in Photoshop views blurry

    Hi all,
    This is probably an insultingly simple query but:
    I've created a map in Illustrator, opened this as a smart object in Photoshop and dragged it in as layer in a PSD.
    When needing to make changes to the map, I've double clicked the smart object icon on the layer list which has opened the Illustator EPS of the map in Illustrator. Made changes, saved and closed - all is going according to plan up until this point.
    When I return to my PSD the smart object has updated alright but it looks all pixilated and blurry. The file hasn't been moved since I originally placed the smart object and nothing I do seems to give me a crisp updated smart object.
    My only option, which is a pain, is to open the original illustrator EPS - make changes - save and start again in Photoshop.
    There must be something I'm doing wrong.
    Any help appreciated!

    Thanks for your help, but still no joy I'm afraid.
    Here are the screenshots doing it the 'save as' way:

  • Challenge: Export Smart Object Vector Data to Illustrator

    I doubt there's any sane way to do this, but I thought I'd throw it out as a challenge:
    We have a photoshop file that is built with many (and I mean many) illustrator vector items that were placed into photoshop as smart objects (and scaled and rotated).
    Unfortunately the file is for packaging, and we now need the vector objects back in illustrator for printing.
    Is there any way to export the paths with their current position, scale and rotation back to ai?
    I think we're going to end up doing it by hand...
    Thanks!
    Niles
    CS2 or 3 and as many g5's and intels as needed.

    Save out a PSD and open it in Illustrator. Tell Illustrator to retain Photoshops layers. You now have the ability to move the vector art around on a layer in Illustrator. If you need to edit text and objects, you need to manually replace the nested object with the original Illustrator art. Spot colors will also transfer to some extent as layered spots.
    PSD is becoming Adobe's interchange format. PDF is trying to have some behaviors of PSD so go and play with them to see what works.

  • How to change the angle into front perspective using smart object vectors

    Hello, I need this answered so i could succesfully do my school project.
    I was using a logo mock up vector(smart object file) for my illustration and was wondering if there is any way to present it in front perspective?
    This is just a sample image. I had created a brand new illustration not just a logo but the effect is same.
    As you can see the wood engraved logo is presented in an angle. Could i change the position of this sample logo into a front view or i have to make this effect myself from scratch?

    On your example i used the Perspective Crop Tool
    1. Draw out the perspective crop and move the corner handles to line up with the inside corners of the logo
        (blue circles)
    2. Then drag out the side handles just outside the image
    3. Press the checkmark button to complete the crop
    You said vector smart object.
    Is that logo something you created in illustrator?

  • Enlarged Smart Objects with vectors inside them appear as resized bitmaps

    In Photoshop CC for Mac I have...
    Created layers of vector art
    Combined them into a smart object
    Enlarged the smart object (both via "Transform" and "Image Size")
    Upon enlarging, the vector objects look the way an enlarged bitmap would (i.e. fuzzy, pixelated, terrible) instead of crisp and clean as a vector should look. I've double- and triple-checked to make sure all layers have remained vector after resizing and they have.
    This is a terrible inconvenience for anyone that works heavily with vector smart objects and resizes them. I use this workflow on a daily basis to make adapting interface elements for various screen resolutions easier, without it I am beyond screwed.
    If anyone knows a workaround (or if this requires a setting that I haven't found to be changed) please let me know.
    Screenshot proof below:

    Read this thread -link http://forums.adobe.com/message/3498406#3498406
    you may want to read it from the beginning.
    Basically while a smart object layer embedded object may contain  vector graphics.  Photoshop renders a composite for the embedded object and uses the resulting rendered pixels for the smart object layers pixels.  When you transform a smart object layer your transforming those pixels like raster layer using your Photoshop preference interpolation preference..  If you want to resize the vector graphics contained in the embedded object you must open the embedded object into the approbate application and resize the embedded object using vector tools. After you commit the resize. Photoshop will update the embedded object and the layers pixel will be the composite rendered for the updated resized embedded object.

  • Photoshop CS6 Scaling issues: Vector/Raster smart objects

    My team and I have noticed some strange issues when affecting the overall interpolation of a .psd via scaling, cropping, or canvas resize.
    Test:
    Original .psd is even x even overall pixel dimensions.
    Original vector and raster smart object assets are all proportionally scaled with width x height percentages equal.
    Preferences: "Snap vector tools and transforms to pixel grid" is turned off
    Resize .psd via Image > Image Size palette.
    Scale styles, constrain proportions selected.
    Every interpolation style tested.
    Resize the .psd to 50%
    Result: All smart objects (both types) no longer are proportionately scaled. Usually off by a minor amount under 1/10th of a percent.
    Some objects' center point shift a half pixel to the right or left.
    This also occurs if we use the crop tool or resize the canvas.
    Is this a known bug and if so, is there:
    1) any setting to truly lock proportions?
    2) any resolution being pursued currently?
    Though the shift and the disproproptions seem minor, the overall quality of items such as icons, hairlines, and other things that should be more crisp become far more degraded in CS6 vs CS5.
    We have over 100 users and need to evaluate if we should drop back down to CS5, where we weren't having any of these issues, as our work demands a lot of precision, so you can see why this is worrisome.
    Thanks!

    I'm not going to say anything about the abysmal rendering of Vector Smart Objects in CS6 because it'll be beating a dead horse but I can explain the issues you see with measurements after scaling.
    The slightly disproportionate scaling and half-pixel shift of the centre is unavoidable when it happens because the resulting Smart Object/Vector Smart Object must measure an integer number of pixels in height and width and be perfectly aligned to the document pixel grid. That's true in CS5 and CS6.
    Say a SO/VSO originally measures 102 x 103 pixels and you scale it by 50%. The Options bar may say the result is 51 x 51.5 px but the result will really be 51 x 52 px, and therefore the new height will really be 50.49% of the old height.
    The original SO/VSO is an even number of pixels wide and an odd number of pixels high, therefore its centre will be halfway down a pixel. The 50%-scaled SO/VSO is an odd number of pixels wide and an even number of pixels high, therefore its centre will be halfway across a pixel.

  • RAW as Smart Objects - Lock Edge Pixel Opacity During Resize

    I'm a professional fine art printer.  I prepare images for large format printing, often starting from the original RAW files.  Since the feature to open RAW files as Smart Objects in Camera Raw was introduced, I've been doing that, as it allows me to go back into the Raw file at anytime and re-tweak as I layer.  I love this option and it is totally indispensable to my workflow.
    HOWEVER, I find a serious flaw when resizing the image for final print, or even when resizing for web-output.  If I do any interpolation (pixel resizing) up or down, the edge pixels are not locked in place, and treated as if they are a floating object, therefore the edge pixels usually show up at a lower opacity, (see attached image).  This KILLS my workflow!  It means I have to completely flatten my work and then resize, loosing all my groovy layers and the ability to go back into Camera Raw and make final tweaks while I make test prints and final decisions with the client by my side.
    Even worse, when I apply the final print sharpening and flatten the file to send out, the edge transparency issue is compounded, and the sharpening adds an ugly halo around the whole image, BLAH!
    What I need is a way for Smart Objects with the exact same pixel dimensions as the file to lock their edge pixels at the current opacity when resizing.  In other words, I need Photoshop to treat the Smart Object as a true Background Layer for certain purposes, while still being able to go back into Camera Raw as I like.  I notice the ability to lock transparency is gone on Smart Objects, which I'm sure is necessary for compositing, but not for what I'm doing at all.
    Is there anyway this can be done in the current CS5 or 5.5 (haven't upgraded yet) that I'm simply missing?  Can anyone from Adobe confirm that this is something you'll look into for me?
    Thanks so much, absolutely loving Adobe products these days, you guys rock!
    Best,
    -B

    I'm not going to say anything about the abysmal rendering of Vector Smart Objects in CS6 because it'll be beating a dead horse but I can explain the issues you see with measurements after scaling.
    The slightly disproportionate scaling and half-pixel shift of the centre is unavoidable when it happens because the resulting Smart Object/Vector Smart Object must measure an integer number of pixels in height and width and be perfectly aligned to the document pixel grid. That's true in CS5 and CS6.
    Say a SO/VSO originally measures 102 x 103 pixels and you scale it by 50%. The Options bar may say the result is 51 x 51.5 px but the result will really be 51 x 52 px, and therefore the new height will really be 50.49% of the old height.
    The original SO/VSO is an even number of pixels wide and an odd number of pixels high, therefore its centre will be halfway down a pixel. The 50%-scaled SO/VSO is an odd number of pixels wide and an even number of pixels high, therefore its centre will be halfway across a pixel.

  • Vector Smart Object Text - P'shop

    Hi Guys,
    I am trying to make a text layer in photoshop and convert to a smart vector object, but it only gives me an option to convert to smart object, as opposed to vector smart object. The bad point about this is that the text becomes rasterised when exported to EPS or PDF (same with vector shapes within a smart object), unlike a regular vector layers which output correctly.
    Is there anything im missing out on, or do I have to revert to importing all text from illustrator and set up my smart vectors like that?
    Thanks
    Bini

    From an old thread in Windows Photoshop forum http://forums.adobe.com/message/3498406#3498406
    Smart Object Layer resize three side by side three  results. Open this link in a new tab http://www.mouseprints.net/old/dpr/3000x2000.jpg
    I resized up big time.  Started by creating a 300x200 PSD file with three layers two shape layers and a text layer with layer style added. The layer style contained a stroke gradient overlay shadow and more. Fitst shape layer Pink Photoshop Cloud. Second shape layer Blue Photoshop Male shape. Top Layer Text JJMack. Link 138KB PSD file http://www.mouseprints.net/old/dpr/logopsd.psd
    here it is saved as Jpeg
    I then Photoshop new Document 3000x2000 ten times the size.  Did menu File>Place and placed in the losopsd.psd file just hit enter did not to any transform.
    Then three times with the placed smart object layer the target I did menu Layers>Smart Objecj>New Smart Object via Copy. I now had three more copies.
    I double clicked on the smart object icon on the botom most copy in the layers palette
    In Photosop menu Image>Size in the dialog checked Resample and Constrain not Layer Styles Bicubic set width 3000 click OK
    Menu File>Save followed by File>Close
    I double clicked on the smart object icon on the middle copy in the layers palette
    In Photosop menu Image>Size in the dialog checked Resample, Constrain and  Layer Styles Bicubic set width 3000 click OK
    Menu File>Save followed by File>Close
    I clickcked once of the top copy in the layers palett, Then Ctr-T and changed the 100% in the width and height to 1000% and committed the transform
    I selected the Left  third rectangle 1000 Px by 2000 PX and added a layer Mask
    Target middle copy Selected left 2/3 2000Px by 2000 PX and added a layer Mask  Saved as PSD and Saved as Jpeg
    Link to 15MB PSD http://www.mouseprints.net/old/dpr/3000x2000.psd
    Here is the Jpeg Link http://www.mouseprints.net/old/dpr/3000x2000.jpg    Scroll the below image sideways to see how different the three are click on the jpg link to have your browser scale it down also note how scalling down seems to sharpen..

  • Vector smart objects

    I am having to copy and paste a graphic from MS Word 08 and place it into Photoshop CS3. It imports as Vector Smart Object and is very blurry. I have done this with MS Word 04 to CS2 with no problems. I searched the forum but did not see any solutions. Any ideas. Thanks

    Welles,<br /><br />Although I have Office 2008 on my system, I don't use it for "publishing". But it does make sense that they now follow the convention of XPress and InDesign with the use of placeholders.<br /><br />(Of course we can see prepress departments, printers and service bureaus around the world finally running out to embrace Word....)  <g><br /><br />Neil

  • Blurry smart objects in Photoshop Save for Web jpegs

    I create graphs, etc in Illustrator, place them as Smart Objects in a master Photoshop file before outputing Save for Web jpegs to use as PowerPoint slide backgrounds. Everything created in Illustrator or Photoshop through that process (Quality 80 or 100 with any of the SfW options on or off) Save for Webs are blurry when imported (at 100%) into PowerPoint. The only way I have been able to get anything crisp in PowerPoint was saving a Photoshop pdf. However, that was only the text created in Photoshop. The Illustrator Smart Object part was still blurry. Anyone have any idea on the best process to combine Photoshop and Illustrator files into one file for import into PowerPoint as a clean, crisp background? At this point I am open to all suggestions.

    There are parts that are being added in Photoshop, hence going from Illustrator through Photoshop as a Smart Object and then onto PowerPoint. If I wasn't 5 months down the line and just nearing deadline, I would recreate everything in Illustrator. Assuming that I have to continue at this point down the Illustrator through Photoshop line of working, how do you designate pngs or jpegs to be 220ppi. Jpegs have a 1-12 quality (and 12 is still blurry).
    Note regarding PowerPoint, I embed the full-page image into the background so others that are using this can't move (by accident or on purpose) the background.

  • Vector Smart Object does not STAY vector.

    When I save my photoshop file as an .eps, I can have all the text from the Photoshop file remain vector, but a Vector Smart Object does not remain vector. Is there a way to have it remain vector?

    While that is true, there are great limitations to the current scenario. I came up using quark for layout and while it is a great typesetting program and has tried really hard to improve its functionality in terms of color management, type effects, pdf export, alpha transparency, etc., it certainly cannot do what what photoshop can in these areas. I made the switch to InDesign several years ago but hated the learning curve with it. I already knew quark and found myself struggling to use InDesign like quark. Now I am back to the old Quark, Photoshop, Illustrator paradigm. Illustrator is another great program that i am fluent in and use daily, but it is easier to do a lot of things in photoshop in terms of image manipulation, etc. So then you are back to the Photoshop plus 1 scenario, only now using Illustrator as your layout program. (quark is still better than this)
    The thing that I hate the most is always having to decide which program best suits each design and also trying to explain my reasoning with others that work with me. For example, If i were doing an image-heavy design with some type that required drop shadows or any other raster effect, i would save a layered tif as my working file (the compression saves space) and an eps for placement in the layout program (to retain the vector type) but heaven forbid i also want to use a vector logo in that design. Now i have my editable tif, my vector/raster eps and my logo. Oh wait, the client wants to move everything around 10 times? OK now i am opening, saving, nudging, opening, saving etc.
    so in essence, show me a layout program that is image saavy as photoshop or an image manippulator that is as vector and type saavy as quark or indesign. Is that really so much to ask? We have paid over and over again for minor versions of all of these programs. I think i photoshop is the front-runner in terms of meeting my needs, at least for single page documents. i love smart objects (vector and raster) double clicking to edit and never having to worry about where one is saved or what color format its in is sweet!! i would just like photoshop to parse reasonably complex vectors and output them.
    It parses complex type just fine, even with drop shadows! OK rant over. Nap time.

  • "Anti-alias" greyed out when free-transforming smart objects.

    While resizing smart objects, I noticed that the anti-aliasing was  very contrasting and not smooth enough for my purposes. I realized that  if I rasterized the smart object before resizing, the anti-aliasing was  better. I then noticed that there was a setting when free-transforming  smart objects called "anti-alias." However, I am unable to activate it  as it is greyed out. So, here's two questions:
    1) Is there a way to make the anti-aliasing for smart objects the same as that of rasterized objects?
    2) Is there a way to activate that "anti-alias" setting when free-transforming smart objects?
    Thanks in advance for any help you can provide

    On top of what Zeno Bokor wrote that while your doing the transform your viewing a quick scaled preview not the actual transformation you wrote
    The SOs I'm talking about are bitmap images I made into SOs to be able to resize and edit without destructive changes, not imported vector graphics from AI.
    You did not state how you made the bitmap images  into smart object.   If you just converted a layer you had been working on into a smart object some damage may have already been done to the bitmap image.  You might  get better results if you started out with a smart object layer to begin with by using ACR open as smart object option or by placing your camera jpeg images into your document as starting points.

  • Smart Object Sampling Technique.

    Hope I named this topic aptly. I'm pretty new to the whole up/downsampling technique thing. In years of web design, I just never had any real need of it.
    However, I ran into the following scenario:
    We have a big PS file full of pixel art & photographs, some of both are smart objects. We'd like to resize a bunch of them, but need bicubic for some, nearest-neighbor for others.
    Is there any way to set sampling techniques for each smart object?
    (If not, where does one post feature requests? ;D)
    Cheers!

    First you need to know th all smart objects are not created equal.  An embedded smart object is a copy of something "Photoshop" can be just about anything Photoshop supports.  A Raw with Raw settings,  A PSD file, A Layer, A layer set etc. Smart Objects can resized two ways. 
    The first way is the re adjust the transform associated with the Smart Object Layer (Ctrl/Command+T).  Transform I believe uses your user id Photoshop preference for interpolation. When a smart object is resized this way Photoshop first renders the pixels for the smart object the resize those pixels like a raster layer using your default interpolation method. Even if the embedded smart object is a vector or text graphic. I guess you could set your Photoshop preference interpolation before doing each transform.
    The second way to resize a smart object is by editing it in Photoshop and use Photoshop Tools.  You do this be double clicking on the smart object icon in the smart object layer in the layers palette. When you do this Photoshop or ACR will open the embedded smart object in Photoshop as a temp work document in ACR the raw file with its current ACR settings applied.   Use the tools approbate to resize.  For example if the embedded smart object was a PSD file use menu Image>Image Size. Check resample the size and interpolation.  Text and Vector layers will be resized using vector graphics or change font size raster layers will be resized using the method you set. When you commit the resize In ACR or use menu File>Save in Photoshop the embedded object in the smart object layer doubled clicked on will be update with the changes you made.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Post installation issues in Oracle 11g

    Hi, i have installed oracle 11g on my windows vista- ultimate OS. installation was successful without any error, but after the completion of installation i found that sqlplus.exe file's icon was not proper. it is like a default .exe icon of vista. mo

  • Issue with usage of Clob variable to hold the output data...

    Hi All, we are getting the output of the sql query out from a function and this function return type is defined as CLOB. because of the volume of data being fetched we are getting the below mentioned error message when this Function is getting execut

  • TS3989 Photostream not updating on windows laptop - please help!

    My photostream is not automatically updating to the picture library of my windows laptop.  The iCloud control panel will not allow me to click Options to check the settings (it just hangs) and I don't know how to uninstall/re-install.  I have checked

  • Oracle license for VMWare server

    A vendor is telling me I can not put their Oracle database on a VMWare server because it is only licensed for one CPU. I tried to explain I could set the VMWare session to only use one CPU but they said Oracle will not allow that. They have already p

  • With holding tax information

    Hi Gurus, Can any one explain me Clearly how to execute J1INMIS. Thanks&Regards Varma