Smart View 11.1.2.5 with Office 32 Bit and 64 Bit

Hello,
Does anyone know if it's possible to install Smart View 11.1.2.5.210 on MS Office 2013 32 Bit and MS Excel 2013 64 Bit on the same machine? We have users that have both Office 2013 32 Bit and Excel 2013 64 Bit installed. It seems like when we run the SmartView.exe it is looking for the full Office 2013 64 Bit suite and it won't install for just Excel 2013 64 Bit. I'm not sure if it's an issue having both 32 bit and 64 bit or if it's because we don't have the full 64 bit Office suite installed.
Thanks!

It does not look for the full Office suit.
Do you have Office 32-bit and Office 64-bit installed on the same machine?
Thanks

Similar Messages

  • MSO.DLL not installed with "office home and small business 2013"

    Hello,
    In my 32 bits application, I use the IInPlacePrintPreview interface on a "word.document" OLE object to show a preview of a word document.
    That's work fine with Office 2013 Standard Edition (32 bits) on a Windows 7 x64 Edition, but my application crash with "office home and small business 2013" (32 bits).
    I have noticed that the call to query the IInPlacePrintPreview interface on the OLE object load the mso.dll of Office into memory.
    The mso.dll is installed with the Office 2013 Standard Edition, but not with the "office home and small business 2013" Edition.
    I guess the problem is the lack of
    mso.dll.
    Do you know why the mso.dll is necessary for the preview of a word document ?
    How do I install and configure mso.dll on a
    "office home and small business 2013" edition ?
    Thanks for your help.

    Hi,
    You may try the ODT (Office Deployment Tool) to configure the Configuration.xml file and install the Office 2013 Home and Business edition.
    Please refer to the following steps:
    1. Downloading ODT from: http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=36778
    2. After downloading the ODT, there will be a Configuration.xml file ODT installed folder. Modify the Configuration.xml file as below so that we can download home business package. 
    <Configuration>
       <Add SourcePath="D:\Office\" OfficeClientEdition="32" >
        <Product ID="HomeBusinessRetail">
          <Language ID="en-us" />
        </Product>
      </Add>  
       <Updates Enabled="TRUE" UpdatePath="D:\Office\" /> 
       <Display Level="None" AcceptEULA="TRUE" /> 
       <Logging Path="%temp%" /> 
       <Property Name="AUTOACTIVATE" Value="1" />  
    </Configuration>
    For more information regarding to the ODT, you can refer to the following link:
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj219422(v=office.15).aspx
    Should you have any questions, please feel free to let me know. many thanks!
    Michael Bai
    Office Client Support

  • Issues with Office 2010 and Acrobat Pro 8

    Good Day All;
    We are in the middle of upgrading from Windows XP to Windows 7 with Office 2010 and I was wondering if there are any issues with importing Office documents into Acrobat Pro 8. I have found out that there are a couple of issue with Office 201 and LifeCycle Designer.
    Any comments would be helpful
    Regards
    Chomp

    Acrobat 8 is not compatible with Microsoft Office 2010 and the PDFMaker plugins will not install. Only Acrobat X is compatible with Office 2010, and at this time only in 32-bit mode.
    Acrobat 8 is also not officially compatible with Windows 7, again Acrobat X is the first version to carry approval for that OS. It will still install, but Adobe cannot guarantee it will operate perfectly in all cases, and doesn't provide install support for that combination.

  • Help with OBDC connection in Windows 7 64bit with Office 2010 32 bit.

    Hi,
    Many moons ago I wrote an application in Java that configured XP machines after they were sysprep’d and deployed. I am currently migrating all our workstations to Windows 7, and was checking my application still worked and queries the correct registry keys etc.
    As it turns out however I don't even get going as I believe the application is unable to connect to the ODBC Microsoft Access Driver in Windows 7 64bit with Office 2010 32 bit. Below is the code I have always used and no longer works. I am hopeful that someone can tell me how to modify the command to work on Windows 7 64bit. If I browse to C:\Windows\SysWow64\OBDCad32.exe all the drivers I need are there I think, but if I open OBDC from Administrative Tools the Drivers tab is empty but for SQL. Anyway I will shut up and below is the code I used to use:
         public IOMakeConnection()
         dm = new DisplayMessage();
         ioed = new IOEncryptDecrypt();
         url = "jdbc:odbc:DRIVER=Microsoft Access Driver (*.mdb);DBQ=" + getPath() + "Config.mdb;Uid=admin;Pwd=password";
              try
              Class.forName("sun.jdbc.odbc.JdbcOdbcDriver");
              connection = DriverManager.getConnection( url );
              catch( Exception e )
              system.out.println( "" + e );
              errorObtainingPath();
    The exception is always thrown as my little app that requests the database path always loads.
    Thanks in advance,
    Cheers Kris

    Hello again,
    Sorry for the delayed response, I have been out of the office for a few days.
    I have solved the issue, and as stated above the issue was the way I was launching the application. Below is a summary of the issue and the resolution.
    My problem was that in Windows 64bit if you click on ODBC in Administrative Tools the Drivers Tab only includes an SQL Driver, and my code reference a Microsoft Access Driver to query the database. That said however if you browse to C:\Windows\SysWow64 and open obdcab32.exe it opens the 32bit version of ODBC, and the Microsoft Access Driver (*.mdb) is listed.
    Basically what I need to do therefore is get my code to access the “32bit” version of ODBC in a Windows 7 64bit environment, so my application was able to read the necessary information from the Access Database associated with it.
    I understand that this is not a coding issue directly, but assuming people still use Java to open an Access Database on a Windows 7 64bit OS, this may be of help.
    So previously I ran the following command, from the “Target” box in a shortcut to execute the java code:
    cmd.exe /C SET CLASSPATH=C:\SCAConfigurationUtility && CD\SCAConfigurationUtility && JAVAW SCAConfigurationUtility
    Windows 7 64bit, defaults to the 64bit version of Java, and just seems to plain fail if you only have the 32bit version installed. To overcome this I forced the java executable that I was using to be the 32bit version, and used the system switches available in Java 7 (-cp does not appear to be available in Java 6)
    So my Shortcut now has this in the “Target” box:
    java.exe -d32 -cp C:\SCAConfigurationUtility SCAConfigurationUtility
    And this in the “Start in” box:
    "C:\Program Files (x86)\Java\jre7\bin"
    Or by using the target below the same shortcut works in XP
    "C:\Program Files\Java\jre7\bin"
    Thanks for all the help,
    Regards Kris.

  • Viewing excel sheet on iPad with top row and leftmost column frozen

    I Wish to view excel sheets on iPad with leftmost column and top row frozen the way it is in excel so that one can move side wards and down with headings intact

    You can try converting the top row to a Header Row and the leftmost column to a Header Column.
    SG

  • Cannot install PIA on Windows 8.1 64-bit with Office 2013 64-bit

    I am building a clean machine after a hard drive failure.  Everything is finally reinstalled WITH THE EXCEPTION of the Office Interop for Office 2010.  I have a clean install of Windows 8.1 which also has Office 2013 installed.
    The documentation for the 2010 library is that it only requires the framework 2.0 present (which is) so it should install.  However when I run the installation program is throws up the window "determining requirements" runs for a few seconds
    then disappears.  
    All I need is to get these things showing up in the GAC so I can get a clean build.  But try as I might I don't have them showing up at all.  Any help would be greatly appreciated!!!
    ADDITIONAL INFO:
      When I run the MSI file it brings up the window that says it is gathering information.
       This run for about 1 second (if that) moves the progress bar about halfway across, then stops and closes down the installation.
      We also installed Office 2010 and reran the PIA with the same results.  *sigh*

    Why do you need to install Office 2010 PIAs? 
    Consider embedding interop types into the assembly without using PIAs on the end user PCs.
    Beginning with the .NET Framework 4, the common language runtime supports embedding type information for COM types directly into managed assemblies, instead of requiring the managed assemblies to obtain type information for COM types from interop assemblies.
    Because the embedded type information includes only the types and members that are actually used by a managed assembly, two managed assemblies might have very different views of the same COM type. Each managed assembly has a different Type object
    to represent its view of the COM type. The common language runtime supports type equivalence between these different views for interfaces, structures, enumerations, and delegates. See Type
    Equivalence and Embedded Interop Types for more information. 
    You just need  to set the Embed
    Interop Types property to True.

  • BIP Deskotop 11.1.1.6 (32-bit) with Office 2010 (32-bit) on Win 7 64-bit

    BIP Deskotop 11.1.1.6 (32-bit)
    Office 2010 (32-bit)
    Win 7 (64-bit)
    The current certification matrix seems to say this is supported, however I am having the following problem:
    1. I have an existing RTF template, with data template that works. I have run it to be sure, and can view output and verify.
    2. If Iopen that RTF template in BIP Desktop, then remove a field, and then using the field browser ( or insert > field ) add that same field back, or a new one the report will not generate output.
    Upload the RTF, and the process will finish with status warning, and it fails during post processing. I look at the Output Post Processor error. edit the RTF template with a text editor and see that instead of putting in a <?YOUR_FIELDNAME?> BIP Desktop has instead inserting something similar to the following: <?ref:xdo0001?>. The only solution I currently have is to manually change these tags, however for large BIP reports this is cumbersome, and unacceptable for a long term solution.
    Is there a workaround? or reported bug? I couldn't find anything on MOS for this.
    Here's the OPP log, you can see the error points to the "REF" element that was added by BIP:Desktop.
    [5/29/12 1:26:38 PM] [8629358:RT6176186] Executing post-processing actions for request 6176186.
    [5/29/12 1:26:38 PM] [8629358:RT6176186] Starting XML Publisher post-processing action.
    [5/29/12 1:26:38 PM] [8629358:RT6176186]
    Template code: XX123XML
    Template app: MUTL
    Language: en
    Territory: US
    Output type: RTF
    [5/29/12 1:26:39 PM] [8629358:RT6176186] Output file was found but is zero sized - Deleted
    [5/29/12 1:26:39 PM] [UNEXPECTED] [8629358:RT6176186] java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
         at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
         at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
         at oracle.apps.xdo.common.xml.XSLT10gR1.invokeNewXSLStylesheet(XSLT10gR1.java:611)
         at oracle.apps.xdo.common.xml.XSLT10gR1.transform(XSLT10gR1.java:239)
         at oracle.apps.xdo.common.xml.XSLTWrapper.transform(XSLTWrapper.java:182)
         at oracle.apps.xdo.template.fo.util.FOUtility.generateFO(FOUtility.java:1044)
         at oracle.apps.xdo.template.fo.util.FOUtility.generateFO(FOUtility.java:997)
         at oracle.apps.xdo.template.fo.util.FOUtility.generateFO(FOUtility.java:212)
         at oracle.apps.xdo.template.FOProcessor.createFO(FOProcessor.java:1665)
         at oracle.apps.xdo.template.FOProcessor.generate(FOProcessor.java:975)
         at oracle.apps.xdo.oa.schema.server.TemplateHelper.runProcessTemplate(TemplateHelper.java:5936)
         at oracle.apps.xdo.oa.schema.server.TemplateHelper.processTemplate(TemplateHelper.java:3459)
         at oracle.apps.xdo.oa.schema.server.TemplateHelper.processTemplate(TemplateHelper.java:3548)
         at oracle.apps.fnd.cp.opp.XMLPublisherProcessor.process(XMLPublisherProcessor.java:302)
         at oracle.apps.fnd.cp.opp.OPPRequestThread.run(OPPRequestThread.java:176)
    Caused by: oracle.xdo.parser.v2.XPathException: Namespace prefix 'ref' used but not declared.
         at oracle.xdo.parser.v2.XSLProcessor.reportException(XSLProcessor.java:806)
         at oracle.xdo.parser.v2.XSLProcessor.newXSLStylesheet(XSLProcessor.java:571)
         ... 17 more

    Solution was to follow: Report Generation Fails Due to oracle.xdo.parser.v2.XPathException: Namespace prefix 'ref' used but not declared [ID 1337111.1]

  • Report generation toolkit problem with office 2000 and office XP

    Hello, I am having a problem with running my vi after it is compiled with application builder. The dev machine is an XP box and the targer is windows 2000. I included _Excel Dynamic VIs.vi and _Word Dynamic VIs.vi from the office 2000 section of the install cd (for the report toolkit) in the compile but did not include those files for XP. When I run the application on the target machine (2000), the reporting functions call Excel just fine and the program does not come up with any errors. The program however, is not loading the approprate template and inserting the approprate data. Did I leave some neccessary files out of the compile? Thanks in advance!
    Greg
    Gregory Osenbach, CLA
    Fluke

    Hi Acer,
    The recommended procedure in your case is to install Microsoft Office 2000 on the development machine and then reinstall the LabVIEW Report Generation Toolkit. When the toolkit is installed, it will check for the current version of Office and install the corresponding VIs to support it. The VIs include different ActiveX calls according to the version of Office. Therefore it is not enough to change the support manually without having the correct version of Office installed first.
    However, I would recommend that you just try to run your executable on a machine that has Office 2000 installed. The difference in the ActiveX API for Office XP and 2000 is not that significant, so your application might work perfectly on an Office 2000 machine. If you try to run the executable on a machine with Office 97 installed I'm willing to bet my right arm that you will experience errors.
    Good luck Acer!
    - Philip Courtois, Thinkbot Solutions

  • Problem opening documents from SharePoint (2013) libraries with Office 2010 and 2013 components installed

    Hi
    I've been encountering the problem of Office files failing to open from SharePoint 2013 libraries with the prefix of 'ms-excel:ofv|u|' etc. in the url. Following the
    helpful questions and answers in the forum, I've identified the likely cause as the fact that my main Office installation is 2010, but I also have installed OneDrive for Business 2013 (which I need in order to sync document libraries with my local drive).
    The solution I've seen suggested elsewhere of deactivating the SharePoint integration of Office 2013 components fails for two reasons: there is no way (or at least, I can't find one) of deactivating SharePoint integration probably because, deactivating
    SharePoint integration would likely stop the syncing of libraries/folders.
    One thing that I have noticed in my case that I've not seen mentioned elsewhere is that if I right-click a document and select 'open in new tab/window' the required
    document opens directly in the relevant office package. I don't know if this is a useful observation, but it seems to be new information.
    My question is, is there a way I can continue to sync libraries and open Office documents directly in Office 2010? My thoughts are possible changes to registry settings
    (which I can do, but don't know enough to find the correct ones myself) or (re)installation of software in some appropriate order to leave the correct settings.
    I have 'repaired' my Office 2010 installation without any observed affect on behavior.
    Thanks
    Ray
    (I've just seen a suggestion that Office 2010 SP2 may fix this issue. I've requested to test this, but whilst this may fix my problem, rolling it out to
    other users may be more problematic. In the meantime, other suggestions of solutions are welcome)

    Hi,
    According to your description, it is a good way to do a test about office 2010 SP2, here is an article about this issue- limitations of using the OneDrive for Business sync app with Office 2010 applications , it may help you.
    http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/sharepoint-help/solve-problems-youre-having-with-the-onedrive-for-business-sync-app-HA104047973.aspx
    Paul Shui
    Microsoft Online Community Support
    Please remember to click “Mark as Answer?on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer?if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread

  • Exchange Online Plan 1 use with Office Home and Business 2013 License

    Question: Does the Office Home & Business 2013 Outlook work properly with Exchange Online Plan 1?  (are there limitations?)
    As a farm dealership needing 44 licenses (very light Office product use except email), I'm struggling with the sustaining cost of Office365 Bus Prem.  I've pretty much settled on buying Outlook 2013 instead of any subscription models.  Office Home
    and Business list price is $219 making a one time purchase cost $9639. I can do that once. (O365BP is $7,920 annual).   Outlook 2013 stand-a-lone will run me around $3500 once plus $2112 annual.  I'd really like the full office package.  I wish
    the pricing worked out better for rural, light use businesses.

    Hi GHopf,
    Great advice from scottylat2486.
    I find some article about the difference of Office production, please refer to:
    Compare Office 365 Business Plans:
    https://products.office.com/en-us/business/compare-office-365-for-business-plans?legRedir=true&CorrelationId=de56e70f-2f8a-4633-87e2-7cf478e1adb2
    Choose Microsoft Office Products:
    https://products.office.com/en-us/buy/compare-microsoft-office-products?legRedir=true&CorrelationId=5770b405-d067-42b4-b799-fc3dbc4cc21c
    Outlook license requirements for Exchange features:
    https://support.office.microsoft.com/en-us/article/Outlook-license-requirements-for-Exchange-features-46b6b7c5-c3ca-43e5-8424-1e2807917c99?CorrelationId=736f8dec-4c9f-4501-a070-191e5833bd71&ui=en-US&rs=en-US&ad=US
    This question may be related to Office 365, please contact Office 365 Team so that you can get more professional suggestions. For your reference:
    http://community.office365.com/en-us/default.aspx
    Best Regards,
    Allen Wang

  • Serialized install of Presenter 10 32-bit on Windows 7 64-bit with Office 2013 32-bit fails

    I used Creative Cloud Packager to create a serialized install of Presenter 10 32-bit for use on Windows 7 64-bit that have Office 2013 32-bit installed. The package created fine, but when I run the setup.exe that CPP generated, the progress bar moves along then undoes the changes and finishes. The Presenter didn't actually install and I get no messages about why it has failed.
    Is there any way I can determine what is causing the failure?
    I have manually run the full installer and it does work as it should. The problem is only when I create the serialized installation with the CCP.

    Hi There,
    If you have Office 32 bit, and OS 64 bit then you need to add Presenter 32 bit media as "Offline Media" . 
    Please find the below steps to create a package for Pn 32 bit and OS 64 bit :
    Launch CCP.
    Click on Create package and click Next.
    Give the name of the package , location to save it , License type as "Serial Number License" , Select "32- bit Package if your OS is 32 bit or select 64- bit Package if you OS is 64 bit" .
    Click Next and Enter the serial Key for Presenter 10. Click Next.
    Click "Offline Media" .
    Click on Browse .
    Browse to Presenter 10 Installer and select "PresenterWin32" and click Ok.
    Click on Extract.
    Select Presenter 10 and click Done.
    Click on Build .
    Regards,
    Mayank

  • ADFS single sign-on with office 365 and multiple forests

    I have 2 forests with one of them (Forest A) only running Exchange / Office 365 in hybrid mode. The other forest (Forest B) has my AD accounts for everyday user login and work. Is there a way to set up ADFS between these 2 forests in order for Forest B
    to achieve single sign-on to office 365? Today users have to login with separate office 365 accounts in order to access email and sharepoint. Short of migrating Forest A into Forest B and getting down to one forest / domain, is there anything else we can do
    to achieve single sign-on?

    Hi,
    Based on my research, we can have one ADFS farm servicing multiple forests, here are some related articles below for your references:
    Multi-forest and Multi-tenant scenarios with Office 365
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/educloud/archive/2013/08/02/multi-forest-and-multi-tenant-scenarios-with-office-365.aspx
    Hybrid Deployment Prerequisites
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh534377(v=exchg.150).aspx
    SupportMultipleDomain switch, when managing SSO to Office 365
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/abizerh/archive/2013/02/06/supportmultipledomain-switch-when-managing-sso-to-office-365.aspx
    For more information about Office 365, I suggest you refer to Office 365 community below:
    http://community.office365.com/en-us/f/default.aspx
    Best Regards,
    Amy

  • Photoshop Elements 11 Organizer: Full screen view of lower quality than with PSE 10 and before?!

    Upgrading from PSE 10 to 11, I noticed that when I watch my images with the organizer in PSE 11 in full screen view mode (F11), while the images load faster, they are shown in a lower quality than in PSE 10 or any other version of PSE that I owned before. In PSE 11, after the initial viewing in full screen (in the "fit screen" mode), when I click with the mouse on an image to display the "100%" view, there is a delay and the program says "Loading...", after which the 100% view in the full screen mode appears. When I then click another time with the mouse on the image to get back to "fit screen" mode, I get an image of better quality than during the initial view!
    So it seems like the program first gives a faster, but lower quality view of the image in full screen mode, and only after the user requests a 100% view, it actually loads the image with full detail, which is then preserved when going back to the "fit screen" view. This is a serious issue for me, because I also use PSE organizer to present my pictures to other people, and I don't want to show them some lower quality versions of my images, but the full quality ones, without having to first choose "100% view" and then go back to "fit screen".
    How can I make the PSE 11 organizer give me a full-quality full screen image right away, as this used to be the case in PSE10 and before?
    (I have both versions, PSE 11 and PSE 10, now on the same computer and tested this to confirm that the PSE 11 initial full screen view is of lower quality than the PSE 10 one. Also in PSE 10, there is practically no delay for displaying the "100%" view afterwards, indicating that the image was loaded with full detail right away.)

    - Update:
    * Adobe's senior support level has replied to me about this issue as follows:
    "Thank you for contacting Adobe.
    When you press the F11 button, Organizer 11 uses the Bicubic
    interpolation mainly because it is less processor intensive compared to
    Bicubic Sharper, and it helps to create the preview on the fly, rather
    than based on the thumbnail cache.
    When you zoom out from the 100% view, Elements Organizer uses Bicubic
    Sharper. This is because Bicubic Sharper is used for image reduction, so
    if the 100% view is larger than the available screen space, it will need
    to shrink. The Bicubic Sharper images may look more crisp however, Like
    any sharpening algorithm, Bicubic Sharper introduces halos and
    edge-enhancement artifacts. Those halos are typically slight, but any
    further sharpening (which you'll need when preparing an image for print,
    for example) will exaggerate them.This is expected behavior. The
    Organizer isn't great for determining exact quality, I recommend you to
    use Elements Editor for this purpose.
    Thank you,
    Bobby Johnson,
    Adobe Technical Support."
    * My reply on this to Adobe is:
    "Hello Bobby,
    thank you for your reply. Now at least we are talking about the same thing.
    Why I am wondering about the choice to use the "Bicubic" algorithm when pressing F11 in PSE 11 is that all previous versions of PSE that I owned (which spans from PSE 6 to PSE 10) did use the "Bicubic Sharper" algorithm right away when pressing F11. So apparently Adobe didn't worry about processor intensity of this algorithm then, and computers are getting all the time more powerful.
    It is true that in some situations, the "Bicubic Sharper" algorithm may introduce halos and edge-enhancement artifacts, as you write. On the other hand, especially on smaller resolution screens, the results of the "Bicubic Sharper" algorithm may look more crisp and lively, while the ones of the "Bicubic" algorithm may look more flat and lack fine detail. This is not only my personal opinion, but as I have brought up this topic in several forums, I can see that I am not alone here.
    So assuming that the question about preferring "Bicubic Sharper" or "Bicubic" as a default algorithm when pressing F11 is partly a matter of taste, and partly a matter of the hardware the user has available, why can Abobe not give the user an option to choose which one he/she would prefer? For instance, F11 gives full screen view with "Bicubic" applied, and CTRL+F11 with "Bicubic sharper"? Or make this an option in the preferences?
    As I am using the PSE organizer also to present pictures to other people (and I know many people who use it that way too), I would like to show them my pictures as sharp and detail-rich as possible. Therefore, I would highly appreciate an option as described above to be implemented in the PSE 11 organizer via an update. It should be fairly easy from a programming point of view, since both algorithms are already contained in the program anyway."
    * If you support this suggestion of mine as stated above, please also contact Adobe accordingly! The more support requests they get for this, the more likely it is that they will implement this update! You may mention my case number 0184046323 for reference.

  • Adobe Acrobat 8 Standard compatibility issues with Office 2007 and Windows 7

    I just updated my platform to Windows 7 and upgraded from Microsoft Office 2003 to Microsoft Office 2007.  The PDF printer did not download and realized that there are compatibility issues with Office 2007.  How could I get this fixed?

    Buy Acrobat 11.

  • Trouble with Office 2013 and KMS activation.

    I have a KMS server running on Server 2008 R2 that was serving out activations for Windows 7 and Office 2010.  I ran the Office 2013 activation
    pack on the KMS server and now it also shows our KMS key for Office 15. I realize that I need a minimum of 5 in the count field in order for activations to happen.
    We use VMware VDI and I spun up a pool of 10 with Office 2013 installed on the master. Before creating the desktop clones, I rearmed the master and then shut it down, snapped it and created the desktop clones. I have logged onto most of the clones
    with a number of different user IDs and when I look at the KMS server it now shows that the count is 9 - so I would assume that my copies are being activated.  However, when I look at Office on the VDI clones or on my own personal computer that has 2013
    installed I see that the product still needs to be activated.  
    Yes we have the VL service record in DNS pointing to the right server - it's been there for ages taking care of Windows and Office 2010.  I did not have this issue with either of the other products and KMS.  I am at a loss as to what
    to do next.
    Thanx...

    check the client-side event logs for the SPP events (request/response), is the client (your pc for example), hitting the expected KMShost, and what response resulted?
    Also check the KMShost event logs, is the request from your pc arriving there, and what came in, and went back as a response?
    If you're not familiar with how to "decode" the events, check here:
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee939272.aspx
    In case you have a "rogue" KMShost:
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/odsupport/archive/2011/11/14/how-to-discover-kms-hosts-via-a-dns-query-and-remove-them-if-need-be.aspx
    EDIT: PS, not that it matters for this question, but there is a dedicated forum for OFF2013:
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/home?forum=officesetupdeploy  :)
    Don
    (Please take a moment to "Vote as Helpful" and/or "Mark as Answer", where applicable.
    This helps the community, keeps the forums tidy, and recognises useful contributions. Thanks!)

Maybe you are looking for