SmcFanControl 2.2.2 and 12-core Mac Pro (picking the right fan to cool HDs)

Hello,
quite recently I've moved from my previous Mac Pro 8-core (the earliest model) to the latest Mac Pro 12-core.
I've successfully used smcFanControl with my old Mac, and the fan names listed in the app's preferences were matching the fans listed by iStat and by smcFanControl in its dropdown menu. In the new Mac Pro there are more fans, not all of them match the names listed by iStat, and some names are "false friends". Please note though that all the fans listed by iStat show up also in the dropdown menu of smcFanControl
Here's the fans list in the preferences of smcFanControl, in this order:
CPU_MEM
IO
EXHAUST
PS
Here's the fans list in the dropdown menu of smcFanControl and in iStat (I'm using the capitalization and order used by iStat, smcFanControl uses always all caps and names "Power Supply" as PS, plus adopting another ordering):
PCI
BOOSTA
BOOSTB
Exhaust
Power Supply
INTAKE
Now, the mapping looks also weird. Here's the mapping tested by increasing the speed of each fan I can control via preferences:
CPU_MEM == PCI
IO == Power Supply
EXHAUST == EXHAUST == INTAKE
PS == INTAKE
BOOSTA and BOOSTB run always at identical speed, and their speed is usually slightly less than 2X the speed of either Exhaust or Power Supply, whichever runs faster. Anyway they don't appear to be controllable via smcFanControl.
Interestingly, the mapping seems to be related to the order of the fans in the dropdown menu of smcFanPro. The first four fans listed there are:
PCI
PS
EXHAUST
INTAKE
My main problem currently is that I haven't yet found a way to keep the HDs at about 40°C or slightly less as I used to do with my old Mac Pro, unless I increase a lot the fans speed, which on the other hand brings down the CPU and RAM temperatures at quite ridiculous levels (basically only a few degrees more than ambient temperature, about 30° these days). What's worse, I haven't found exactly which fan affects more directly the HD temperatures. Increasing only the speed of a single fan never seemed to be enough, unlike with the old Mac Pro.
So, here are my questions to anyone using smcFanControl 2.2.2 on a Mac Pro 12-core:
1) Do you believe I should reinstall smcFanControl to get the correct list of fans? Or is this a known issue? (please note that I started using the new Mac by using Apple's migration utility, so also smcFanControl was "copied" from the old Mac like all other apps) If I have to reinstall smcFanControl,do you know if I should clean/delete specific directories or files to remove the old fans list?
2) Do you know which fan cools down most the HDs? I have four HDs so all bays are used. I've looked around quite a lot but I haven't found any diagram showing the fans position inside the Mac's case
Thanks a lot in advance for your reply and best regards,
Giovanni
Message was edited by: gs_mac

Put a fan in lower optical bay blowing on the drives? just kidding though.
Some drives now like WD Black 1TB+ do run normally at 40-41*C and that is in part because they are now engineering parts to be safe at those temps to reduce on cost of cooling and going green which can have a huge impact on data and server farms by just 5*C warmer.
My WD 10K VRs run COLD as can be and always have.
My advice is set the rpm for all fans @ one speed and then have 2 or 4 profiles: default, medium, high and extreme. Default is 499 for one and 599 for others. 900 rpm is just about when fans can be heard. 1200 rpm for more active cooling and 1800-2000 rpm for high.
The idea is in part to prevent it from getting warm first and then the system kick up the fans. Harder to get heat out of the case once it is there.
I think you are trying to "over-control" just a bit.
Prefe ences are in ~/Library/Preferences or just delete all the profiles. It probably has an uninstall.
I trust Temperature Monitor (freeware)  or paid version (Hardware Monitor) a bit more than iStatPro.

Similar Messages

  • Time machine only copies User Info and Users (Applications, Library, and System are missing) from my quad core Mac Pro.  45 Gb of 162 Gb are missing.  Any one having success with time machine copying all folders using Mavericks?   What do I need to do dif

    Time machine only copies User Info and Users (Applications, Library, and System are missing) from my quad core Mac Pro.  45 Gb of 162 Gb are missing.  Any one having success with time machine copying all folders using Mavericks?
    What do I need to do differently?

    The late, great Pondini was investigating that issue before he passed away.
    See here: https://discussions.apple.com/thread/5125969
    I think there might be information there on how to reset Time Machine to do a full backup. I think you basically have to reset it and start over.

  • 12 Core Mac Pro and Quark 8.16.2 Processor Crash

    I have installed 2 12 Core Mac pros with Quark 8.16 and am having the same problem on both. After running Quark for 20 or 30 minutes, the processors all run at 100% and Quark eventually becomes unresponsive. A force quit is required.
    Quark has no reports of this problem, anyone else using Quark on a 12 core?

    No change here either... I have been onto Quark and I have deleted the Preferences folder more times than I need to remember... and even deleted in the home/library/preferences/quark and setup a new "Preferences" (Cap P) in the Application/Quark 8.0 folder and still no improvement. It worked perfect at first... then I went back ands setup my settings.... increased cache levels and various settings... so I'm thinking it could be one of those effecting the situation... I haven't had the time or patience to try since the last time... but the Quark defaults work fine for quitting... well they did the time I did it and testing.... just need to test more... or maybe wait for 10.6.5... it might sort it also...
    Talk soon...
    Anthony

  • How do i engage my 8 core mac pro to use all it's cores when using final cut pro and other applications that need processing power? at the moment they seem to be idle...

    how do i engage my 8 core mac pro to use all it's cores when using final cut pro and other applications that need processing power? at the moment they seem to be idle...

    First, did you use Setup or Migration Assistant? That can happen when coming from a PowerMac or sometimes even from another (Intel) Mac.
    Second, wait for the next version of Final Cut due very soon to ship (may have to wait for the ".1" of course to clean up any early issues.
    Final Cut Pro - Wikipedia
    There are a few apps that are better.  I think you can run multiple instances of Handbrake for one.
    I've read about and wanted to try PowerDirector 9 (Windows)
    PowerDirector 9 video software
    video editing software Wiki

  • WD1001FALS and 3.0ghz Mac Pro 8 Core Compatibility Questions

    Hi all,
    This is my first post, I think, in the three years I've been a member, so, please excuse my lack of knowledge of these forums.
    I've searched this particular forum for info on how well WD1001FALS drives work on a Mac that should be here Monday and I could not find any references. I can get a couple of these drives from a friend at a really nice price.
    First, are they compatible? If so, does Spread Spectrum Clocking (SSC) work on a Mac?
    Second, will they work together as a software RAID mirror, and do you think this is necessary since I am using Time Machine for an external backup? If so, what would any of you set the chunk size to for photo editing in Photoshop and Aperture 2.0 among other photo apps? 64k perhaps, or larger? I'll be running 10gigs of ram if that needs to be known for any answers to any of my questions.
    I apologize for all the questions, especially in a first post but, I need to give an answer to my friend by Saturday. Any help will be greatly appreciated.
    All the best,
    Mark Megerle

    The Mac Pro, unlike the older G5s, couldn't care less about SSC, well it does in that it supports SATA specifications fully.
    I didn't know the WD Black series were out and available. Let us know how they do. I would also invest in a fast boot drive along with those. Would be nice to see WD 1TB added to Barefeats 1TB comparison http://www.barefeats.com/hard94.html
    Just don't think you want or need mirror, maybe stripe for performance. I would never be without just TimeMachine for backups, or one method. I would leave the block size to default unless working with video.
    You can partition your drive and have an outer partition on each and then combine those into a scratch stripped RAID for Photoshop and then use the rest for data or a 2nd RAID, up to 3 such sets. If you want a more flexible RAID or mirror, I would look into SoftRAID
    Some background on Photoshop performance
    http://www.adobe.com/go/kb401089
    http://homepage.mac.com/boots911/.Public/PhotoshopAccelerationBasics2.4W.pdf
    What having 8 DIMMs can do for memory bandwidth and performance:
    http://www.barefeats.com/harper12.html

  • 8-core Mac Pro and Freehand MX

    Has anyone run Freehand MX 11.0.2 on 8-core Mac Pro with
    Leopard 10.5?

    > Has anyone run Freehand MX 11.0.2 on 8-core Mac Pro with
    Leopard 10.5?
    It now crashes twice as fast! ;o)
    -Darrel

  • Which memory modules to use for upgrade 8 core Mac Pro

    I am planning to upgrade the memory in my new 8 core Mac Pro, I use it for graphics and video editing (FCS2), I am wondering what would be the advantages and differences between getting the 8GB upgrade in 2-pair of 4GB module or 4-pair of 2GB module, I know the price for the first choice is almost double the second.

    OK, so according to the http://www.barefeats.com/harper3.html Memory Tests, all slots filled means the fastest speed. So here's my question:
    I'm about to buy a 2,8GHz MacPro with 2GB RAM, and I want to upgrade to 8GB. I was considering buy an 8GB Kit from Crucial (629.99$), and either leave the original 2GB and add the 8GB to the free slots, or just take the original out and leave only the 8GB modules. And this would be my question before reading the Memory Tests article.
    So I went back to Crucial's online store and did some math, to see how much it would cost me to fill the remainder slots (6, counting off the 2 used by the original RAM) with 1GB modules, instead of my previous idea of 8GB (2x4GB). So, a 2GB Kit (2x1GB) cost 127.99$, multiplied by 3, which is what I would need to achieve a total of 6GB, to add to the original 2GB, will cost 383.97$.
    That's 246$ less than the 8GB Kit! And according to the Memory Tests, even faster.
    Isn't this too good to be true? What's your word?
    Thanks a lot.

  • Need help improving XP SP3 performance on 4-core Mac Pro 2009

    I'm running Windows XP SP3 under Boot Camp 3 (Mac OS X v. 10.6.2). Currently, XP is on a second partitioned HD, but it was previously running on a drive all its own with the same problems which are:
    When I boot into Windows the sound stutters quite a bit. I updated the Realtek drivers and used the Apple USB device (24" LED speakers) but nothing completely got rid of the static/stuttering.
    The real problem comes when running Left 4 Dead. Whenever I get to a new part of any level (where zombies are) the graphics freeze for up to a few seconds and the sound gets glitchy, repeating broken staticky snippets. I don't have other games installed but I get similar performance when watching a YouTube video in Firefox.
    Is this normal for Windows on a Mac Pro or do other Mac Pro Boot Campers run Windows smoothly? I have seen YouTube videos of Windows running smoothly on MacBook Pros and iMacs. Just wondering if I'm doing something wrong.
    Finally, I'm running two graphics cards, an ATI 4870 and an NVIDIA GT120. I've run with both on, one off, the other off, the NVIDIA removed, the NVIDIA installed. No matter what I do, the video glitchiness is always pretty bad. (The audio is also bad.)
    Thanks in advance for any info or pointers.

    I have had success running boot camp on an 8-core Mac Pro from 2009. I have an ATI 4870.
    I initially used Windows 7 Beta (32bit) and then RC (64bit) and finally the shipping version (64 bit Professional).
    32-Bit crippled Crysis performance for me (only the demo). I was able to run the game with most settings all the way up (excluding Anti-aliasing), at 1920x1080 and it ran fine for about one minute before hitting the hard-drive for about 10 seconds. This thrashing occurred repeatedly and I have up - that problem was resolved when I moved to 64bit Windows.
    Other games I have played with no trouble are The Orange Box & Borderlands, each with maxed resolution and settings.
    Optical audio and the front headphones work fine for me - though the 4 conductor cord does not recognize the microphone (from an iPhone headset) in Windows, which gets me down as it would be nice to audio-chat in some games.
    Try these thing in this order if you can, and have not already:
    Patch the game (though if this is happening in Firefox as well, it seems like an OS problem)
    Update directX (I really have no clue here, I assume Windows does this automatically?)
    Try demos of other games
    Upgrade the OS to 64bit (Especially if you have over 3GB of ram
    Go from XP to 7 (I have had no trouble with Windows 7 on my machine)
    Try a DVI monitor (I am using a 21" Westinghouse, have never connected an Apple display)
    Good luck!
    Owen

  • New 8 Core Mac Pro Question

    What will the 8 Core Mac Pro do for Aperture? I know you need 4 gig of ram and the ATI video card. I am just curious about what processor to purchase.
    I find that Exporting images from a wedding of 800 or so images takes about 2.5 hours on my G5 Dual 1.8 with 3 gigs of ram. I would really like to speed up the Export process!
    I will also be using Photoshop CS3 when it ships. Will Actions that I have written run faster on the 8 Core Machine?
    I just need some buying advice.
    Kevin Hawkins

    How much Aperture alone sees today is not so much the point as is what happens with real world performance. Real world it is not just about the theoretical limit of what Aperture sees; apps and the OS/RAM/GPU/CPUs all work together, and folks typically do have more than one app open at a time. My expectation is that although certainly fully functional with 4 GB, the kind of users that run Aperture on a MP will find that greater than 4 GB of RAM is clearly beneficial.
    Anecdotal reports also seem to indicate that Mac Pros have an inherent need for more RAM than previous boxes needed.
    Also OS 10.5/Leopard is due soon enough that we should be planning new box configurations based on our expectations of what impact Leopard and Aperture v2 will have on RAM utilization. My strong opinion is that we will be able to take advantage of more RAM as 2007/2008 play out.
    In any event 4 or 5 (1 Apple plus 4 third party) GB of RAM is an excellent place to start, and RAM always gets cheaper and is easy to retrofit later. IMO we should buy only 2 GB sized DIMMs to facilitate maximum future expansion.
    -Allen Wicks

  • Cannot Synch iPhone on New 8-Core Mac Pro

    I have had my iPhone since the first day they went on sale in June 2007. It has performed flawlessly for me and continues to do so. I have been using the iPhone with a white iMac purchased in March 2007. I have never had the slightest problems with synching my iPhone on my iMac under first Tiger and now Leopard.
    Yesterday I purchased an 8-core iMac with Leopard installed. The 8-core is running beautifully. I used Setup Assistant when I booted up my Mac Pro for the first time to transfer my data, applications, etc. from my iMac to my Mac Pro. The transfer appeared fine for over 3.5 hours with the blue progress bar going all the way to the right. Then with "one minute remaining" the process hung and went unchanged for 1.5 hr. I called Apple Support. They told me to shut down and then reboot the Mac Pro. I did and it booted up fine. I found that some of my applications had to be reinstalled and I did so. These apps then ran fine.
    However, although iTunes ran fine on my Mac Pro and my music library appeared just as it should, I got the following error message when I tried to synch iTunes with my iPhone: The iPhone "My Name" cannot be synched. You do not have enough access privileges for this operation!". This is in spite of the fact that my account is an administrator account.
    Once again I spent 3 hours on the phone with Apple Support and went through two levels of iPhone support. In the end they could not solve the problem. My final Apple Support person recommended an archive and install. I have now completed the archive and install. I am still experiencing the same error message when I try and synch the iPhone.
    I am desperate to solve this problem, and I would appreciate any help anyone can provide.
    One more piece of information. My iPhone does appear in iTunes when it is sitting on the dock. The synch does begin before this error message appears. Furthermore, when I select the Info Tab across the top after selecting my iPhone under the devices on the left, and I make any changes and click "apply" the iPhone synchs, finishes synching, and does so with no error messages. However if I then hit the synch button again, I get the behavior described above with a failure to synch and the given message.
    I thank you in advance for any help that you can provide to me. All suggestions are welcome.
    Tom

    I have the same problem and I was getting very frustrated with this because when the alert comes up it gives you no idea of where to look for a solution BUT I also just found a website which helped me resolve the problem. I just did it and everything is fine. The iPhoto is the culprit here and you have to reset it's permissions and privilages.
    Read on and happy syncing!
    http://vaguelyaware.com/2007/11/01/leopard-aches/

  • Mac Pro 2009 - the base is uneven and "wobbles"

    I just picked up a new 8-Core Mac Pro. I have a glass desktop table. Upon setting the Mac Pro on top of it, the unit "wobbles" I know the glass desktop is even and flat. From what I can tell the front right side and rear left (if looking from the front of the unit) are to blame. When flipping the unit on its side I can see the rubber "sliders" or "cushioned feet" are present. The question is, should I try to fix it myself with some type of "hack" or exchange it?
    Thanks!

    Try and see if they will fix it for you. You paid for that warranty, why not try to use it first. It is expensive to replace the cabinet, so I expect everyone will try to straighten it out. They may have straightened out a ton of them.
    They may tell you it is shipping damage, and you should make a claim against the shipper, but it is their shipper, and they have much more sway with the shipper than you do. So they should at least help you with that.
    I was surprised when my son's MacBook refused to load CDs. They told me that the MacBook frame was bent, and that they had a tool to straighten them out, which they had done, no charge. Oh, and by the way, try not to pick it up one handed by the corner.

  • Better video cards for the new 8-core Mac Pro...?

    I don't know a ton about video cards. I did some research and the internet says that the Nvidia GeForce GTX 295 video card is the best card out right now. Will it work in the 8-core macpro? If not, or if it's not the best, what is the best video card that will work in the 8-core macpro?
    P.S.
    Does anyone know how to tell exactly whether a video card is better from another? I mean I can guess a video card at 1792MB is going to be better then one at 512MB, but I've also heard that, for example, the ATI Radeon HD 4870 512MB is better then the NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 512MB, and apple charges more for it so it probably is better, but all that tells me is the name of the cards, and that they are both at 512MB, so from that without any other information I would assume they're exactly the same just made by different companies, but there must be some other details that would explain why it's better right? Thanks in advance

    Well I found out the Quadro FX 4800 works on it, that looks pretty good.
    It's a good card, but it has a different application focus.
    What applications do you use?
    Answering that helps determine what the best card is.
    The 5800 is better though, will it work?
    Better, how?
    The spec's read better?
    How about real world performance?
    Benchmarks?
    They are very similar in shape and such.
    Shape has little to do with anything.
    The ROM is the key.
    If the card is not produced as "OS X compatible", it does not have Mac ROM and cannot be used.
    If there is a Mac edition that is similar (same GPU series, similar architecture) the ROM may be flashed to Mac ROM.
    Especially in Geforce cards, the ability to edit ROMs and even write portions of the ROM is necessary to be able to flash a card.
    Even then, no guarantees.
    Often a port on a flashed card won't work after flashing.
    Seems the 5800 has a 10 bit display port, so if the card were flashable, the display port wouldn't work.
    The ROM chip size of a card is also of concern.
    Many cards require either a new, larger ROM chip to accept the Mac ROM (soldering), or, require a hacked, "reduced" ROM to be written to allow flash.
    Invariably, there will be some feature loss with a reduced ROM, but a good hacker usually gets rid of superfluous stuff.
    Cards with more VRAM than the Mac counterpart will often times lose the extra VRAM- it won't be read by OS X.
    Then there is the EFI question, which often creates a final stumbling block for converting a card.
    There are many pioneers who flash cards.
    If a card is flashable, it has already been done.
    The Quadro 4500, 4800, and 5600 have all been worked out.
    As of yet, the 5800 hasn't been sussed out for flash (as far as I can find).
    Flashing the card is easy.
    Finding a physically compatible card and a compatible ROM are the hard parts.
    The two best retail cards for the Mac Pro are the Geforce GTX 285 and the Radeon HD 4870.

  • Installed Memory not showing up in a late 2009 Dual Core Mac Pro

    I have a late 2009 Dual Core Mac Pro.
    I restarted the my computer today, an a utility popped up saying something about I need to re-arrange the memory in my mac because it was not optimized.
    I thought this was weird because all the slots are filled with 2 gigs chips for a total of 16 gigs.
    When I checked about this Mac it said I only had 12 gigs of memory in my system.
    I went to open up the case, and there are to red light glowing for slots 7 and 8 on the motherboard, and any memory chips I put in those slots do not show up.
    Can anyone tell me what is going on and how to fix it.
    There was a power outage the other day, but I keep my machine on a surge protector.
    I generally try to take really good care of my computers so seeing something wrong out of the blue like this is a little freaky for me.
    Any help would be great.
    Thanks
    Stan

    Each "side" is operated independently, so slots 1, 2, 3 and 4 are one set, and 5, 6, 7, and 8 are an independent set. The third and fourth slots on each side share a memory channel, so a failure of one module in these two slots could possibly disable the other one.
    The Mac Pro uses the Error Correction Code hardware built into its Xeon processor to provide single-bit (in a word) Error Detection and Correction in Hardware. It also can detect double-bit errors, but these cause a kernel panic, machine-check, error overflow or uncorrected error. This is by design, to avoid poisoning you data.
    The Error Correction Code hardware is used in a special way at Startup. Any failure (correctable or not) that occurs in the first few seconds while running the Power-On Self Test causes your Mac to declare the slot(s) of those modules "empty" and simply not use them in the running system. Vigilance is required, because the next time you run this test, those Bad modules may pass.
    So the movie version is that you have some DIMM(s) that have failed, and you should remove them from your Mac and consider whether to replace them with good modules, or to add some larger modules.
    I expect your recent power failure, protected by a UPS, is merely a coincidence, not a cause-and-effect.

  • Illustrator CC 2014 running EXTREMELY slow on brand new 6 Core Mac Pro with 64Gbs of Ram. This can't be right :(

    Hi,
    I've just picked up a brand new 6 core Mac Pro and I am having some serious lag issues with Illustrator CC 2014. I am just trying to select relatively simple objects (an illustration of the side of a coin) and there is a massive delay between when I click on an object and when it actually becomes selected.
    Someone please tell me they know how to fix this? Please

    after the two fixes above in illustrator cc Im still experiencing
    file open - nothing happens
    file place nothing happens
    fix - quit illustrator and restart - open file from the folder lol
    PS CC
    A wierd warning popping when I want to open a file nothing opens just the warning
    fix quit out and start again
    for those of you out there in yur 40s and this is your career you started like me on photoshop 2 or 3 on an lc 6/100 60 and even on the quadras lol
    this is the first time Ive had seen so many bugs in adobe software
    why I bought it the curve tool astute dont have a curve tool and I work alot with them and the funky title branding it looks cool visual consumer glutton lol
    so yeah now going to look at how to stop my monthly subscription  will proabably have to go to that forum next lol
    an d evert back to CS6 im outputting to many jobs to have these hold ups

  • Poor performance with Yosemite and early 2009 Mac Pro

    I have an early 2009 Mac Pro with the following specs:
    - 2.66 GHz Quad Core Intel Xeon
    - 10 GB of 1066 MHz RAM
    - NVidia GeForce GT 120 512 MB
    - 256 MB solid state drive for my system partition
    - Two monitors connected, each at 1680x1050 resolution
    Back when I was running OS X 10.7 or 10.8 I found that for every day tasks the performance using my computer was adequate. However, starting around 10.9, and even worse since upgrading to 10.10, thinks have gotten painfully slow. To give an example, activating Mission Control can take upwards of four seconds, with the animation being very choppy. Changing tabs on a Finder window can take two seconds for the switch to happen. Just switching between different windows, it can take several seconds for a window to activate. It's gotten to the point where I'm having difficulty working. So I'm thinking of upgrading some of my hardware.
    Given my specs the weakest link seems to be my graphics card, and all of these issues do seem to be related to graphics. So my questions are:
    - Do you think upgrading my graphics card will substantially improve things, and is there anything else I should upgrade?
    - Is this slowness just the result of the computer being nearly six years old, and no upgrades will really improve things that much?
    Thanks in advance!

    Between Setup Assistant, and your existing system "untouched" (or use CCC if say you want to use an existing SSD for the system) there is no reason it should be a lot of work setting up. Have you ever used Migration or Setup? it has also gotten better.
    Also, having 10.9.5 on another drive and running DU - and TRIM _now_ would be helpful.
    Looking at just what gremlins you have running around inside your current system is not bad but.... sometimes the "long road" turns a shortcut into a dead end, and avoiding doing what seems the long road and hardest gets you where you want to go: a solid stable system.
    Less is more. Most systems have more than needed and they get in the way and can cause trouble. Even handy "widgets" and those things that monitor system functions, even disk status. Which is why I like seeing a separate small system maintenance volume just for the weekly checkup. 30GB is more than enough so just slice out a partition somewhere - on another drive/device.
    Those things, more so than and a lot cheaper than a new GPU. If  your SSD is two years old, the 840 EVO from Samsung is down under $120 for 250GB, or use one for Lightroom / Aperture / iPhoto or scratch.
    One person was complaining about sluggish window issue and thought it was the driver. Turned out It happened in ONE APP, not everywhere - very telling - and the app in question needs update. Adobe updated CC (for Windows) last month to finally support dual Dxx and some of the newer AMD GPUs - can the mac be far behind?
    10GB RAM? that would not be 3 x 4GB or any combination using triple channel memory.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Trying to edit a .pdf file. Please help.

    I just downloaded the Adobe Acrobat 30-day free trial, which comes up as "Adobe Assistant" on my machine, and I've been trying to use it for editing a .pdf file, but it doesn't do anything but want to download an entire folder of documents. I don't w

  • Lightroom versus PhotoShop Elements Organizer and Bridge

    This is directed to the Adobe Developer Team I hope someone of the Developer team is reading this!! For my understanding the three products out of one house (PhotoShop Elements Organizer, Bridge and Lightroom) doing about the same, should ... work th

  • Connecting problem: PC to mobile

    Hi, I had earlier connected my mobile to my PC, but am facing a problem. Whenever I used to connect my 6708 to my PC with a USB cable, there used to a a small icon on my phone showing 'connected'. It doesn't anymore. When i connect it, all it does is

  • HT204655 Photos app stuck @ 12%

    Photos app says it is preparing library on first use but gets stuck at 12%.  I have restarted 3 times trying to fix the problem and it doesn't work.  Any ideas?

  • User  Inforamation

    hai friends, actually iam  abap developer, here my boss is asking all the users, usernames, plant , transaction code, tranasction name , whether he is active or inactive(status)in production. it is very urgent. Thanks & Regards Jagadeeshwar.B