SMTP Error 452 Too many recipients

We are using Exchange 2007 at a school to send email to parents. When we send out email to all parents we get an error back from yahoo: 452 Too many recipients.
We have 34 recipients on the list.
Is there a way to configure Exchange SMTP outbound to break this up so it only sends to say 10 at a time?
Thanks,
Glenn

Here's more info on the problem after looking at the logs a bit more.
When we send to yahoo with 34 recipients, the first recipient is accepted and all the rest are rejected as 'too many recipients'. Exchange then tries again with the remaining users and one more email is accepted. In our case it does this three times and then hits a case where the first
yahoo email address is a bad address. Yahoo comes back with an error for this address and 'too many recipients' for all the others. It then gives up and does not try to send the remaining addresses.
Being able to control the max number of recipients per smtp session would be one fix to this problem as I could set it to something like 10 so that even if one recipient is rejected, the others would not also get rejected as having 'too many recipients'.

Similar Messages

Too many recipients at this hour

Thu Jan 3 15:47:04 2008 Info: New SMTP DCID 2880414 interface 10.1.1.6 address 202.144.198.251 port 25
Thu Jan 3 15:47:04 2008 Info: Delivery start DCID 2880414 MID 5800177 to RID [0]
Thu Jan 3 15:47:04 2008 Info: Delayed: DCID 2880414 MID 5800177 to RID 0 - 4.1.0 - Unknown address error ('452', ['Too many recipients received this hour']) []
Thu Jan 3 15:47:04 2008 Info: MID 5800177 to RID [0] pending till Thu Jan 3 15:49:08 2008 [Default]
Thu Jan 3 15:47:11 2008 Info: DCID 2880414 close
anyone know what this is? too many recipients this hour?

To follow up on Poesjkin's message, that error text is exactly what an IronPort ESA will give when it applies rate limiting. If the receiving MTA is indeed an IronPort ESA, then that drastically narrows the likely reasons for the rate limiting. The most likely reason is that your sending ESA has an IP address with a poor SenderBase reputation, or has no reputation at all. Another good possibility is that that IP address fails the address->name->address double-lookup DNS verification. Try investigating those and see what you come up with.

Too many recipients found for message type (Distribution model)

Hi,
I wanna send Dilvery note using message type DESADV from a SAP system to another non-SAP System.
I have Created port partner profile and distribution model.
But the Problem is the same message type DESADV is used to send Dilvery from SAP System to another SAP Client.
Idoc getting failed and throwing error stating Too many recipients found for message type DESADV in the ALE model .
I am sure we can create the more than one recipients for same message types. I have done it some time back. Any help highly appreciated.
Regards
Raj

This message pops up when SAP can't identify how to distribute the IDoc based on the settings in BD64. Take a look at the settings there, most likely you'll need to add a filter.
The big ALE/EDI/IDoc book suggests that the same IDoc may be distributed to 2 different systems but specific details are not clear. It seems that one system should be configured first (it does mention a need to use a filter) and then somehow menu Edit -> Model View -> Distribute should be used.
I've never done it myself though and have only run into that error when I missed some filter settings in BD64. Hope this helps.

ALE settings error "Too many recipients found for message type" urgent

Hi all ,
please help me to solve this issue !!!!!!!!
i done with ale settings .
in the bd64 , orders message type is used in 2 different model view for 2 different systems
when i create po it is giving error in output "Too many recipients found for message type ORDERS in the ALE model"
how can i rectify this error.
Thanks

Hi,
Try to redefine your distribution model to have both receivers of your message type ORDERS in one "model view".
Regards,
Jakub

ALE error "Too many recipients "

Hi all ,
please help me to solve this issue !!!!!!!!
i done with ale settings .
in the bd64 , orders message type is used in 2 different model view for 2 different systems
when i create po it is giving error in output "Too many recipients found for message type ORDERS in the ALE model"
how can i rectify this error.
Thanks

Hi,
Please refer the link below:
http://www.jt77.com/CRM/related-discussion-6255.html
Thanks,
Sriram Ponna.

I get a "Too many recipients" Thunderbird error msg when trying to send a group email -- how many is too many ? does Thunderbird have a limit?

My ISP says it doesn't impose a limit on the number of recipients in a group email, BUT still I get a Thunderbird error msg. Why?

Well, no, because 4 or 5 times a year, someone writes in with pretty much exactly your question because they too have had a message refused with the "too many recipients" warning. We suggest they use a Mailing List and all is well.

ORA-29278: SMTP transient error: 421 Too many concurrent SMTP

Hi Gurus,
I'm send emails by using UTL_MAIL in oracle 10g but some time I got this error
ORA-29278: SMTP transient error:
421 Too many concurrent SMTP connections;
please try again later
my database detail are as under
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Prod
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
CORE 10.2.0.1.0 Production
TNS for Linux: Version 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
please help to resolve this issue.
Thanks in advance
sadiq

CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE production_status_email
AS
v_sender VARCHAR2 (100) := '[email protected]';
v_recipients VARCHAR2 (100) := '[email protected]';
v_cc VARCHAR2 (200) := '[email protected]';
v_date date default sysdate-1;
v_subj VARCHAR2 (200) := 'Production Status of ' || to_date(v_date);
l_mesg LONG := NULL;
v_mtype VARCHAR2 (30) := 'text/html; charset=us-ascii';
l_greetings LONG := NULL;
l_table_heading LONG := NULL;
l_table_data LONG := NULL;
l_line_total LONG := NULL;
l_line_bpcs LONG := NULL;
l_table_footer LONG := NULL;
l_regards LONG := NULL;
n_row_counter NUMBER := 0;
n_sr_counter NUMBER := 1;
d_date DATE;
n_sum_frozen_quantity NUMBER;
n_sum_plan_quantity NUMBER;
n_sum_achieve_quantity NUMBER;
n_sum_price NUMBER;
n_sum_b_pieces NUMBER;
n_sum_b_price NUMBER;
BEGIN
l_greetings :=
'Dear sir,'
||'Following is Production Status of '
|| v_date
|| '
l_table_heading :=
'<table border = "1" cellpadding="1" width="100%" >
<tr bgcolor="CYAN">
<th align="LEFT" width="100">Main Resource</th>
<th align="LEFT" width="150">Sub Resource</th>
<th align="LEFT" width="60">UOM</th>
<th align="RIGHT" width="100">Frozen Quantity</th>
<th align="RIGHT" width="100">Plan Quantity</th>
<th align="RIGHT" width="100">Acheived Quantity</th>
<th align="RIGHT" width="100">Amount</th>
<th align="LEFT">Reason</th></tr>';
FOR mr IN (SELECT DISTINCT mrno, mresource
FROM image.production_status_v
WHERE pdate = TO_DATE (v_date)
ORDER BY 1)
LOOP
l_table_data :=
l_table_data
|| '<tr><th align="LEFT">'
|| mr.mresource
|| '</th>';
n_sr_counter := 1;
FOR sr IN (SELECT srno, sresource, uom, frozen_quantity, plan_quantity, achieve_quantity,price,
remarks
FROM image.production_status_v sr
WHERE mresource = mr.mresource
AND pdate = TO_DATE (v_date)
ORDER BY srno)
LOOP
IF n_sr_counter > 1
THEN
l_table_data := l_table_data || '</tr>';
l_table_data :=
l_table_data || '<tr><td></td>';
END IF;
l_table_data :=
l_table_data
|| '<td align="LEFT">'
|| sr.sresource
|| '</td>'
|| '<td align="LEFT">'
|| sr.uom
|| '</td>'
|| '<td align="RIGHT">'
|| TO_CHAR (sr.frozen_quantity, '99,999,999')
|| '</td>'
|| '<td align="RIGHT">'
|| TO_CHAR (sr.plan_quantity, '99,999,999')
|| '</td>'
|| '<td align="RIGHT">'
|| TO_CHAR (sr.achieve_quantity, '99,999,999')
|| '</td>'
|| '<td align="RIGHT">'
|| TO_CHAR (sr.price, '99,999,999')
|| '</td>'
|| '<td align="LEFT">'
|| sr.remarks
|| '</td>';
n_sr_counter := n_sr_counter + 1;
n_row_counter := n_row_counter + 1;
END LOOP;
l_table_data := l_table_data || '</tr>';
IF n_sr_counter > 2
THEN
SELECT SUM (frozen_quantity)
INTO n_sum_frozen_quantity
FROM image.production_status_v
WHERE mresource = mr.mresource AND pdate = TO_DATE (v_date);
SELECT SUM (plan_quantity)
INTO n_sum_plan_quantity
FROM image.production_status_v
WHERE mresource = mr.mresource AND pdate = TO_DATE (v_date);
SELECT SUM (achieve_quantity)
INTO n_sum_achieve_quantity
FROM image.production_status_v
WHERE mresource = mr.mresource AND pdate = TO_DATE (v_date);
SELECT SUM (price)
INTO n_sum_price
FROM image.production_status_v
WHERE mresource = mr.mresource AND pdate = TO_DATE (v_date);
l_line_total :=
'<tr bgcolor="#F0F0F0">'
|| '<th align="RIGHT" colspan="3">Total</th>'
|| '<th align="RIGHT">'
|| TO_CHAR (n_sum_frozen_quantity, '99,999,999')
|| '</th><th align="RIGHT">'
|| TO_CHAR (n_sum_plan_quantity, '99,999,999')
|| '</th><th align="RIGHT">'
|| TO_CHAR (n_sum_achieve_quantity, '99,999,999')
|| '</th><th align="RIGHT">'
|| TO_CHAR (n_sum_price, '99,999,999')
|| '</th>
</tr>';-- <td></td>
l_table_data := l_table_data || l_line_total;
END IF;
IF mr.mresource = 'Stitching' then
SELECT SUM(bqr)
into n_sum_b_pieces
from image.bundle2
WHERE to_date(bqr_date) = TO_DATE (v_date);
SELECT SUM(bqr * (SELECT ROUND (oe.price * er.rate)
FROM orderent oe, ex_rate er
WHERE oe.currency = er.currency
AND oe.order# =
SUBSTR (b2.order#, 1, 7)))
into n_sum_b_price
from image.bundle2 b2
WHERE to_date(bqr_date) = TO_DATE (v_date);
l_line_bpcs :=
'<tr bgcolor="#F0F0F0">'
|| '<th align="RIGHT" colspan="3">B Pieces</th>'
|| '<th align="RIGHT">'
|| ''
|| '</th><th align="RIGHT">'
|| ''
|| '</th><th align="RIGHT">'
|| TO_CHAR (n_sum_b_pieces, '99,999,999')
|| '</th><th align="RIGHT">'
|| TO_CHAR (n_sum_b_price, '99,999,999')
|| '</th>
</tr>';-- <td></td>
l_table_data := l_table_data || l_line_bpcs;
END IF;
END LOOP;
l_table_footer := '</table>';
--------------------------regards sectionstarts-
l_regards :=
'<Address> Regards, Information Systems
</address>';
-----------------------regards section ends;
l_mesg :=
l_mesg
|| l_greetings
|| l_table_heading
|| l_table_data
|| l_table_footer
|| l_regards;
IF n_row_counter > 0
THEN
UTL_MAIL.send (v_sender,
v_recipients,
v_cc,
NULL,
v_subj,
l_mesg,
v_mtype,
NULL
END IF;
END;
/

Email - too many recipients

Each month I email out our Parish Newsletter to about 120 addressees. This month, for the first time, it failed to deliver, returning an error message saying that I am exceeding the temporary limit of the server and that I have too many recipients. I tried to resolve by splitting into 2 mails of 60 addressees but got same error message
I can understand the need for anti-spamming techniques, but
1. What has changed since last month?
2. How temporary is "temporary" ie when will things normailise?
3. What is maximum number of recipients I can use during this temporary measure?
tks
SD

I have several groups set up in WLM (I use Windows 7). The sizes range from 6 to over 70. Until very recently I have had no problems sending emails to these groups. However, I have been away for a couple of weeks and since returning have been unable to send to the groups with 70 members. I get an error message relating to the server of a particular recipient, quoting error message 452.
On researching this it would appear that the recipient whose address in each case is blocking the sending, is number 50 on the list; implying that WLM has put a restriction on the maximum number I can have in a group. I contacted BT yesterday who said they had made no changes to their operation, and, anyway, they could only speak about using the web based BT Yahoo.
I received a message today from BT saying that the problem was "solved". I spoke with them since I tried a test message to one of my groups with 50 recipients - which failed, but when I deleted one person the test message went through.
A different BT customer service person explained that because of the amount of spam being generated these days, a limit was being put on the number of recipients that could be in a group sent via BT. Their suggestion was that I split my larger groups down to less than 50, but also don't send out emails to two smaller groups within a small space of time. They said that they were "monitoring" the situation but did not commit themselves as to what will happen in the future.
I am clearly unhappy with this situation and will be contacting BT more formally about it. At least it explains why my (larger) group emails are being rejected.
Do BT view these forums?

Too many recipients specified

Hi ALL.
Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)
libimta.so 6.2-3.04 (built 01:43:03, Jul 15 2005)
SunOS correo 5.9 Generic_117171-17 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-280R
Im having an error when one of my users try to send an email to more than 500 local mailboxes, the mail.log_current log shows the next error:
09-Dec-2006 00:12:12.34 tcp_intranet J 0 [email protected] rfc822; [email protected] 452 4.5.3 Too many recipients specified.
09-Dec-2006 00:12:12.34 tcp_intranet J 0 [email protected] rfc822; [email protected] 452 4.5.3 Too many recipients specified.
09-Dec-2006 00:12:12.34 tcp_intranet J 0 [email protected] rfc822; [email protected] 452 4.5.3 Too many recipients specified.
09-Dec-2006 00:12:12.34 tcp_intranet J 0 [email protected] rfc822; [email protected] 452 4.5.3 Too many recipients specified. (limit reached; last J record for this session)
I edit the options.dat file this is a copy of this file:
! MTA configuration options
! This sets the alias resolution order
! 8 = Use ALIAS_URL0
! 7 = Use ALIAS_URL1
! 6 = Use ALIAS_URL2
! 4 = Use the alias file
DOMAIN_UPLEVEL=3
ALIAS_MAGIC=8764
ALIAS_URL0=ldap:///$V?*?sub?$R
USE_REVERSE_DATABASE=4
REVERSE_URL=ldap:///$V?$N?sub?$R
USE_DOMAIN_DATABASE=0
ALLOW_RECIPIENTS_PER_TRANSACTION=1500
ALLOW_TRANSACTIONS_PER_SESSION=1500
REJECT_RECIPIENTS_PER_TRANSACTION=2500
! MISSING_RECIPIENT_POLICY controls how illegal headers that don't
! contain any To:, Cc:, or Bcc: fields are handled for channels that
! do not have their own explicit missingrecipientpolicy keyword set.
! The default of 0 means that the envelope addresses are used to
! construct a valid To: header field. This default behavior tends
! to be especially appropriate for the tcp_local channel.
MISSING_RECIPIENT_POLICY=0
MISSING_RECIPIENT_GROUP_TEXT=Undisclosed recipients
ALIAS_DOMAINS=6
LOG_HEADER=1
LDAP_SCHEMALEVEL=1
VACATION_TEMPLATE=file:///opt/SUNWmsgsr/data/vacation/$3I/$1U/$2U/$U.vac
Do somebody known how to fix this issue???
Tanks Ram

Shane,
Thank you for the message. I think the real solution was putting the lines in the "tcp_local_option" file vs the "tcp_local.opt" file name. I'm not up on how things vary from version to version -- the original poster was using 6.2 and I'm on 6.3. I figured file names wouldn't change across minor versions. I guess I shouldn't make those type of assumptions. The user just tried sending again with their Thunderbird client, and was able to send to the group of user names being used.... i.e. it worked.
For completeness, two points.
1) here is a tweaked entry for the error in the mail log:
20-Jul-2007 11:46:49.84 tcp_intranet JE 0 [email protected] rfc822; [email protected] 452 4.5.3 Too many recipients specified. 2
The error message that came back to the user also said "too many recipients".
2) On page 404 of the "Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.3 Administration Guide", it says under section 12.9.7 "Limiting Message Recipients" regarding recipientlimit and recipientcutoff:
recipientlimit specifies the total number of recipient addresses that will be accepted for the message.... No message will be accepted for delivery if the limit if the value is exceeded.... The default for both infinite unless the corresponding channel keyword is specified.
I interpreted that paragraph to mean that it was a maximum number of users allowed to be sent to in a message, not a minimum (lower-limit); meaning that if no value was given in some file, then one could send a message to any number of users. In no way did I conclude your idea of : "So by being 'unlimited' this just means that the smallest applicable limit applies ". I'll have to work on the concept some more.
Hal

Too many recipients found for message type ORDERS in the ALE model

Hi all ,
please help me to solve this issue .
i done with ale settings .
orders message type is used in 2 different model view for 2 different systems
when i create po it is giving error in output "Too many recipients found for message type ORDERS in the ALE model"
how can i rectify this error.
Thanks

> orders message type is used in 2 different model view for 2 different systems
do both of them carter diffrent needs or is it the same idoc which is being sent to diffrent systems?
if yes, then use a single model view with noth receiver systems defined in it.
if not, i would suggest, copying the standard idoc and create a zidoc and then use different ones for diffrent receivers....
or u can use diff versions of the orders message type...
say orders05 for one.... receiver and orders02 for another one....
hope this helps!!
Cheers!!
Sidharth

Too many recipients found for message type in the ALE model

Hello Friends,
Please help me in solving this error. I have a Outbound sales order confirmation ORDRSP .
In the distribution model i have defined the sender receiver and message type clearly...
But in va01 after creating sales order extras ->Output->Hearder --->Edit
Output type-- BA00
medium --ALE
Dispatch time : Send Immediately
I am getting a error -
Too many recipients found for message type ORDRSP in the ALE model
Message no. B1130
Diagnosis
In the ALE distribution customer model several recipient systems for IDOCs with message type ORDRSP and filter object type 'KUNNR' with value '100' have been modeled from this system, but only one recipient system is allowed.
Procedure
Please change the ALE distribution customer model so that it allows only one recipient system for the message from this system.
Please help me in solving this error.
Regards,
jeevan

Hi Jeevan,
In BD64, the said problem occurs, since the message type ORDRSP will be configured to different Logical System.
Since you are creating sales orders & Output type, system doesnt knows, to which Logical system, it has to be sent since the Message type exists more than once.
select Your respective Logical System where the Outbound Sales Order Confirmation ORDRSP has been created.
Under the node ORDRSP, add the filter group for Customer.
Double click the Filter group and add the respective Customer No.s to whom the Order confirmation needs to be sent.
Then create Sales Order Confirmation & Output type. Data will be passed(IDoc) to the respective Customer(where the customer no.) exist in the filter.
Hope it solves your Issues.
Regards,
Anbalagan.

Is anyone else getting a "554 too many recipients" when sending to groups?

I am trying to work from home, and a current project has a large number of people that need to stay informed. When I try to do a "reply all" to the group I get a "554 Too many recipients" error message back really quickly. Seems I can only send to 49 people at once...needless to say this casues problems as the group (so far) is 74 people...
Anyone got a work arround other that splitting up the group into two messages (what a pain)
Supposedly the WebMail interface will let me send to 100 at once, but I can't cut-n-paste the addresses from Outlook to Webmail without some MAJOR editing.
Suggestions PLEASE

Hey Bob -- You are correct that there is a limit to how many outgoing recipients an email can be sent to, but it is 100 unique addresses. It sounds like you may be having an issue with your Outlook program; possibly the way your address book is configured if you have more than one address saved for each person you're trying to send the message to. The address book would be a good place to check first and then looking into troubleshooting the Outlook program would be your next step. Thanks!
Karl
Verizon Support
Notice: Content posted by Verizon employees is meant to be informational and does not supersede or change the Verizon Forums User Guidelines or Terms or Service, or your Customer Agreement Terms and Conditions or Plan.

STARTING DATABASE : PROBLEM OF Linux Error: 23: Too many open files in syst

Hi everybody,
I am running an RMAN script and get this error,
9> @/u01/app/oracle/admin/devpose/backup/configuration.rcv
RMAN> ###################################################################
2> # Configuration file used to set Rman policies.
3> #
4> ###################################################################
5>
6> CONFIGURE DEFAULT DEVICE TYPE TO DISK;
RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
RMAN-00569: =============== ERROR MESSAGE STACK FOLLOWS ===============
RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
RMAN-03002: failure of configure command at 08/26/2009 20:03:30
RMAN-06403: could not obtain a fully authorized session
ORA-01034: ORACLE not available
RMAN> CONFIGURE RETENTION POLICY TO REDUNDANCY 1;
RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
RMAN-00569: =============== ERROR MESSAGE STACK FOLLOWS ===============
RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
RMAN-03002: failure of configure command at 08/26/2009 20:03:30
RMAN-06403: could not obtain a fully authorized session
ORA-01034: ORACLE not available
RMAN> #CONFIGURE RETENTION POLICY TO RECOVERY WINDOW OF 7 DAYS;
2> CONFIGURE DEVICE TYPE DISK PARALLELISM 2;
RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
RMAN-00569: =============== ERROR MESSAGE STACK FOLLOWS ===============
RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
RMAN-03002: failure of configure command at 08/26/2009 20:03:30
RMAN-06403: could not obtain a fully authorized session
ORA-01034: ORACLE not available
RMAN>
RMAN> CONFIGURE CHANNEL DEVICE TYPE DISK FORMAT '/u01/app/oracle/backup/db/ora_df%t_s%s_s%p';
RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
RMAN-00569: =============== ERROR MESSAGE STACK FOLLOWS ===============
RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
RMAN-03002: failure of configure command at 08/26/2009 20:03:30
RMAN-06403: could not obtain a fully authorized session
ORA-01034: ORACLE not available
But this problem is understandable, as the database is not running. The main problem why database is not running, I have found the reason but do not understand how to solve the problem.
Since, the database was not running, I tried to startup the database, I then came across the following which is my problem (Why so many files are open? Linux OS error says too many files open. See below,
SQL> conn /as sysdba
Connected to an idle instance.
SQL> startup
ORACLE instance started.
Total System Global Area 419430400 bytes
Fixed Size 779516 bytes
Variable Size 258743044 bytes
Database Buffers 159383552 bytes
Redo Buffers 524288 bytes
Database mounted.
ORA-00313: open failed for members of log group 2 of thread 1
ORA-00312: online log 2 thread 1: '/u01/app/oracle/oradata/devpose/redo02.log'
ORA-27041: unable to open file
Linux Error: 23: Too many open files in system
Can anybody has run into such problem and guide me to a solution, please?
Thanks

Hi,
yes, this DB was functioning o.k. this configuration script was part of RMAN daily backup.
Last night the backup failed. So, when I opened "Failed job" in the EM, I saw this type of messages.
That was the starting point. Gradually, I tried to narrow down on to the actual problem and found the findings as I have posted.
One way of sovling problem, I thought that, all these processes I would kill and then try to open the database, it might startup. However, that wouldnot lead me in ensuring this won't occur again.
That's why I am trying to understand why it should open, so many processes (why spawn so many .flb files?) Any thoughts you have around this?
I will try to restart the OS as the last resort.
Thanks for your help and suggestions.
Regards,

After Loading Lion I now get 5 windows w/ a graphic of a Red Stop sign with an ! mark and the following text message: "DAVE Networking Dave kernel extensions could not be loaded! Error 71 - Too many levels of remote in path."

After Loading Lion I now get 5 windows w/ a graphic of a Red Stop sign with an ! mark and the following text message:
"DAVE Networking
Dave kernel extensions could not be loaded! Error
71 - Too many levels of remote in path."
I have uninstalled DAVE and used Clean App to remove trace elements of program, however I still get the message and am unable to eliminate the error messages. When I click OK the message goes away briefly and then comes back up.
Any solutions would be great.

Dave,
Thanks....What I did was load the free eval version of Dave 9.0 and then used the uninstaller which must have deleted the kernel giving me the problem.
Thanks for the response.
Razor

Provider hosted app error message: The remote server returned an error: (429) Too Many Requests.

Hi,
I have a customer running a provider hosted app and in Sharepoint 2013. Things have been working fine but recently they keep experiencing an issue where the all the app parts on the page show the following error message. Does anyone have an idea what
could be causing this problem and how I can fix it? The Sharepoint site and provider hosted app site are running on a Server 2008 R2 box with IIS 7.5.
Server Error in '/Test.Sharepoint.App' Application.
The remote server returned an error: (429) Too Many Requests.
Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code.
Exception Details: System.Net.WebException: The remote server returned an error: (429) Too Many Requests.
Source Error:
An unhandled exception was generated during the execution of the current web request. Information regarding the origin and location of the exception can be identified using the exception stack trace below.
Stack Trace:
[WebException: The remote server returned an error: (429) Too Many Requests.]
System.Net.HttpWebRequest.GetResponse() +8527180
Microsoft.SharePoint.Client.SPWebRequestExecutor.Execute() +58
Microsoft.SharePoint.Client.ClientRequest.ExecuteQueryToServer(ChunkStringBuilder sb) +975
Test.Sharepoint.AppWeb.Pages.LatestAnnouncement.GetLatestAnnouncement(Boolean showFullText) +610
Test.Sharepoint.AppWeb.Pages.LatestAnnouncement.Page_Load(Object sender, EventArgs e) +764
System.Web.UI.Control.LoadRecursive() +71
System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint) +3178
Version Information: Microsoft .NET Framework Version:4.0.30319; ASP.NET Version:4.0.30319.18034
Impreza Software Development

Hi GuYumming,
I have checked the Sharepoint site using Fiddler and my X-SharePointHealthScore stays consistently on 1, I have even refreshed the site and had the "(429) Too Many Requests" error happen right in front of me whilst Fiddler is running and when I look at the
200 response for the Sharepoint site it is still showing "X-SharePointHealthScore: 1".
I assume because of this I do not need to make any of the changes suggested in your article above?
I have also been through the ULS logs and found the following 3 log entries that appear to relate to the issue but they do not really mean much to me so I am hoping that you can help:
Begin CSOM Request ManagedThreadId=59, NativeThreadId=12476
SPResourceTally(ClientServiceRequestDuration) value 1 + 150425 > 150000
ResourceBudgetExceeded, sending throttled status code. Exception=Microsoft.SharePoint.SPResourceBudgetExceededException: ResourceBudgetExceeded     at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPResourceTally.Check(Int32 value)
at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPAggregateResourceTally.Check(SPResourceKind kind, Int32 value)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Client.SPClientServiceHost.OnBeginRequest()
Impreza Software Development

SMTP Error 452 Too many recipients

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for