SNP Interactive Planning. Problems for SNP PPM plant

Hi All
Can you advise please why SNP interactive planning does not create SNP planned order when there are SNP and PP/DS related PPMs together.
And once i delete SNP PPM, SNP interactive planning creates SNP Planned Order without any problems.
Once i again create SNP PPM and run SNP interactive planning- it does not create planned order to fullfill demand.
Thanks
Best Regards
Andrey

Hi Nandha
Thanks! You solved a problem. PPM had maximum/minumum lot size 100 while in product master in Quantity determination max/min lot size fields were empty.
I've added the same values to product master as in PPM and run again SNP interactive planning.
And planned order was created.
Thanks!
Best Regards
Andrey

Similar Messages

  • UC320 dial plan problem for New Zealand

    Hi all,
    Our UC320 will no longer make outbound calls to local/national New Zealand numbers. International is fine. The problem is that if I dial:
    09 375 5967, it gets normalized to +64093755967    (notice the 0 after the 64) and the call fails.
    If I dial 0064 9 375 5967 it gets normalized to  +6493755967     which is correct and the call works. My users simply won't accept having to dial the additional 0064 for local numbers.
    Any idea how to fix this?
    Cheers. 

    Hi,
    the problem as you know already is cause by your secondary extension numbers, that are perfectly overlapping with some external numbers. What is the reason for these secondary extensions ?

  • Saving data in the Interactive Planning Data

    Hi,
    I want to save data in the interactive Planning and for some key figures it says that the data is saved successfully but the data is not saved when I returne to the Interactive Planning.
    What can it be?
    I have looked for possible causes, but I have not identify it 
    Thanks in advance

    Hi ,
    Are the key figures that you are trying to save data for "auxillary key figures" . If so they will retain their value only till your are in the interactive planning screen , once you back out and come in again you will not be able to see the values that you put earlier. Check that and update me
    Thanks
    Saradha

  • Can't create PPM plant for SNP usage from PP/DS

    Hi All,
    I can't create SNP plan from PP/DS in PPM via SAPAPO/SCC03 and further Goto, SNP PPM generation.
    The error message is "order has no activities" Check your master data (PPM or iPPE). Message number  /SAPAPO/OM082.
    Need help.
    Regards, Andrey

    Hi,
    1. Tcode /SAPAPO/OO_PPM_CONV.Enter Product an location and execute.
    2. Create SNP name.
    3.Select the line item, click on mass date change,enter today's date ,flag the PPM for conversion and save.
    4.Select Goto----> Genrerate.Inthe initial screen enter the start date of the generation period,Bucket size, typical order size and Maximum no of modes and priority.
    5.Alternatively you can do this step 4 in tcode /SAPAPO/OO_PPM_CONV_310 after flagging the PPM directly in this tcode.
    6. Genrerate the SNP PPM.
    Note : Execute /SAPAPO/SCC03 and enter Loc Product and  Usage P and execute and enter . You will have the PPDS PPM screen.
            If you want to have SNPPPM enter Usage as S.
    Thanks,
    nandha

  • Issue in capturing in transit in SNP interactive planning book

    Hi,
    We are facing issue in capturing in trasit in SNP interactive planning book.
    We are using standard planning area ( 9ASNP02) on which we have build up planning book which is copy of standard planning book. Earlier standard planning area was containing key figure 9AITRAN(in transit)attached to category group (IT1) which contained categories AH, EI.
    As intransit was coming under category CS we added category in category group IT1. After adding it the intransit is not visble in planning book in key figure in transit but when we checking details of cell the value is present with start and end date as 01.01.1970 where as in RRP3 view intransit is present under current date.
    Before additing category CS in IT1 group the intransit was not coming but now after adding category also the in transit is not visible in cell but present in detail view with wrong dates.
    Regards,
    Vrushali.

    HI,
    Stock in transit keyfigure will display only EI orders (incase of VMI
    scenario) and AH orders (if you create inbound delivery).
    If you integrate stock,CS orders only will be available in /sapapo/RRP3.
    The root of the problem is in the setting from Intransit key figure:
    from a planning area management point of view it reflects
    the setting used in the standard SNP planning area  but the customizing
    of the category group used there is different from the one used in
    standard systems.
    Actually you added category CS there. But category CS has a atp category
    type 0, which means stocks actually. In the SNP planning books by design
    stocks are read separately from other orders because  have to be
    considered in the ATD computation.
    Therefore if you need to read orders with category CS you should
    consider it in the category group assigned to the ATD receipts key
    figure and to the stock key figure.
    This customizing could be applied at the planning area level, as
    described above or at the master location level, SNP tab.
    In this case you can specify there the category groups which have to be
    used in order to consider stocks, ATD receipts and ATD issues about all
    products assigned to the used master location. Please refer to the
    related F1 helps in order to get more information about.
    You can get more information at note 591310.
    Regards,
    Sunitha

  • SNP PPM can't be activated

    Hi ,
    I am working in SCM 5.1 , I wanted to test the dependent demand flow in SNP heuristic run and for the same I have tried to create PPM. I have created resource bucket  & single mixed both. But when I am trying to activate the SNP PPM it gives me error "No linked PP/DS plan exists for SNP plan". IS it necessary to have PP/DS plan for SNP ppm ? Is anybody else faced the same problem in SCM 5.1 ?
    Thanks for your support.
    Best Regards,
    M

    Hi,
    are you getting some more error? like 'bucket consumption is not defined'. then you have to define the 'bucket consumption' in the resource. go to 'mode' of the 'ppm' and check resource consumption is properly defined or not.
    thanks,
    Satyajit

  • SNP PPM need to be created

    Hi
    I want to create a only SNP PPM when a Routing is CIFed from R3. currently, we are getting the PPDS PPM.
    pl let me know, where will be the setting to create SNP PPM directly in APO.
    Thanks
    JK

    Hi JK :
    SNP PPM can not be generated from R/3 directly .
    It can be manually created in APO through transaction SCC03 .
    Also if you dont want to create it manually then you can do through this , when you CIF  BOM & routing , A PPDS ppm gets created in APO .
    This can be converted into SNP PPM , It is also possible to convert for the whole plant in one go or can select certain products for a plant.
    SNP PPM is generated in APO based upon existing PPDS PPM .  So, every time an R/3 recipe or BOM is changed, the PPDS plan will automatically be updated.  However the equivalent SNP plan must be regenerated manually to account for the R/3 changes.
    there are two steps :
    selection of the required plans via /n//SAPAPO/OO_PPM_CONV
    & conversion of those selection plans /n/SAPAPO/PPM_CONV_310.

  • SNP PPM Generation after the delta change in PPDS PPM

    Dear Colleagues,
    In oss note 1172838 SAP AG states that there is no auto link to
    generate SNP PPMs from PPDS PPMs,when PPDS PPMs are changed from R/3
    and recommends the customers to do that manually.
    Yes, that is possible if the company uses not more that 50-100 PPMs,
    but that is not the case in our business.
    We have ~10000 SNP PPMs and it is impossible to track the changes and
    update the PPMs manually.
    What we need (when there is a change in PPDS PPM) is a report which will:
    1. Delete SNP PPM with invalid mode combination and the Production
    (Planned) orders which use that PPM. The old SNP PPM must be deleted as
    the existing name of SNP PPM is required.
    2. Create a new mode combination taking into account the changes in the
    PPDS PPM.
    Then we will run transaction /SAPAPO/PPM_CONV_310 and generate the new
    SNP PPMs.
    Task in point 1 can be done with transaction /SAPAPO/PPM_DEL,
    but it does NOT give us the possibility to select only SNP PPMs
    with invalid/obsolete mode combinations. Besides that it can not be run in
    background, but in foreground.
    Would you share you experience if you have faced the same/similar problem.
    Best Regards,
    Alper Myumyun

    Hi Senthil,
    The problem is that the mentioned check does not work. I have even opened an oss message where I have got the following answer:
    First you have to re-generate the SNP PPM (invalidity of the old mode combination will be generated) and then the
    check will warn you about the invalidity.
    This is so because at the first stage there is no issue of it being obsolete until a new one is created.
    At the point that you Generate SNP PPM is when the mode invalidity is generated and not before. So its not possible for the warning to have come when there is no invalidity.
    /SAPAPO/SAPLSCC_CPIT2 looks scary. There are tons of includes in it. Would you specify which one is used for the mentioned check? INCLUDE /SAPAPO/LSCC_CPIT2F09?
    Thanks for your help.

  • Getting error while trying to generate SNP PPM

    Hi Experts,
    I am getting error, while trying to generate SNP PPM fron PP/DS PPM. It says Set up matrix for resource in planning version is not define. But I checked that i havea set up matrix as well as setup group.
    Any help will be appreciated. Thanks In advance.
    Sani

    Hi Sani,
    Try running resource & ppds ppm consistency check against
    their respective transactions (/sapapo/res01 & /sapapo/scc_03)
    and check any inconsistencies found.
    Regards
    R. Senthil Mareeswaran.

  • SNP PPM and R/3 BOM concept??

    Hello All,
    I am using SNP for planning a material in APO. That material has many sub-component in R/3 BOM. I am interested in only one of its sub component.
    Currently we release forecast from DP to R/3 and plan that finished material in R/3.
    My question is " Can I plan only the finished material and only one sub-component in SNP?"
    Also can I release the forecast for the finished material to R/3 as well as to SNP and plan rest all sub-component in R/3 and the one sub-component that I am interested in in SNP?
    Thanks,
    Sanju

    hi,
    Yes, you can plan the FG material and ur required subcomponent matl in SNP by ensuring that MRP type is XO for these products while Cifing them to APO.
    when Forecast is released from DP to SNP, the planning takes place and ppm exlposion happens which gives planned orders for FG, dependent demand planned orders for the sub component u require.
    when the planned orders for the FG is cifed to R/3 and mrp run is taken, bom explosion happens in R/3 ensuring planning for the rest of the sub components ( no additional plan is generated for the already planned sub component in SNP)
    So, u dont need to release the plans to R/3 and SNP simulataneously which will lead to double planning.
    Hope that explains ur query .
    revert back in case of ane doubts.
    kiran

  • Upload single level variable cost in SNP PPM in mass by MASSD

    Hi experts,
    I am trying to upload single level variable cost in SNP PPM in mass by MASSD by following selections:-
    Selection
    Object Type:- PPM
    Selction Criteria:-
    Component:- Plan        Attrib:- Use of Plan
    Component:- Plan        Attrib:- Plan
    Components & Attributes to be Maintained
    Component:- Plan        Attrib:- Var.Sing.Lvl Costs
    While maintaining the cost, under selection criteria, compoment: PLAN and attribute: PLAN I am unable to maintain multiple plan names.
    The single level variable cost that I have to maintain for all these plans is the same and therefore was trying to use transaction MASSD
    Can you please throw some light on how multiple PLAN selections can be done?
    Regards
    Chetan

    DEAR GURUS,
    *There is a question regarding the resoucre  consumptions  relevant to PDS in SNP,*
    ****The inputs are:****
    ****1) Base Qty= 7700 TH****
    ****2) Set Up =45 MIN****
    ****Resource consumed by operation activity is 112 207 seconds = 31,17 hours.****
    ****Unfortunately we didnu2019t understand how this figure is calculated.****
    ****Can you please help us in this****

  • Linking SNP PPM to desired ECC production version

    Hi
    We have a need where we manually create SNP PPMs and so the APO and ECC have no connection in terms of the PPM or production version.
    I have two SNP PPM1, PPM2 in APO and I have two production versions in SAP ECC, VA and VB.
    The requirement is to some how maintain a table in APO where we can choose to map the SNP PPM to ECC production version.
    something like
    SNP PPM1 and PPM2 both need to refer to version VB so that an SNP planned order pushed into ECC would automatically pick up production version VB.
    Appreciate if any one can throw some light on how we can create a user maintained table or Z transaction  in APO to achieve this.

    Hello KA,
    Could you please let me know why you want to change the source of supply in ECC only?
    Do you have PPDS? If yes then you can have one source of supply for that production version VB and transfer these orders to ECC system.
    Apart from that if you want to do the development then check FM /SAPAPO/DM_PROD_ORDER_CHG_OLTP inside that with your own custom logic you can update the production version.
    Best Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • SNP PPM Activation

    Hi All:
    I have created a SNP PPM which is also activated .I have a PIR for same product for which produrement type is production.While running SNP heuristic I am getting Planned Order but source is supply is shown as blank.Can some one tell me how this inconsistency can be resolved ?
    Ashish Gupta

    The demand is in Location A.
    The PIR says to get the product for Location A from Location B.
    The PPM is in Location B.
    Product in Location B says in-house.
    Version is set to "no orders without source of supply".
    Is that your setup?

  • Switch between SNP-PPM and SNP-PDS

    Hi,
    In APO I have both SNP-PPM and SNP-PDS, but right now I am having some trouble with the bucket time from the PDS so I am trying to temporarly change my PDS to PPM.
    My query is:
    - Is there a way in APO to make the SNP-PPM the default production model over theSNP- PDS?
    I was searching for some kind of documentation on this topic and I found that I should change the priority for the PDS throught the PDS_MAINT transaccion in ECC, is this the only way to do it?
    Thank you in advance,
    Fernando

    Hi ,
    SNP heuristics  planning source determination gives first preference to Quota arrangement.
    You may include PDS as a source of supply in the inbound quota arrangement of the product.
    There is a BADI  BAdI /SAPAPO/PWB_SOS to modify the content and the sequence of the sources of supply in the ranking list.
    The normal ranking list for SNP source determonation  is as below:
    Quota arrangements
    Procurement priority
    Procurement costs
    Procurement type
    There are two other BADIs releveant as below:
    u2022        /SAPAPO/CURTO_SNP ) Enhancements When Creating an SNP PDS (R/3) (Generation)
    u2022        /SAPAPO/CULLRTOSNP ) Change SNP/CTM Production Data Structure Data (Generation)
    Hope this gives some options.
    Regards
    Datta

  • SNP PPM and Co-products

    Hello All,
    Our design is to have one SNP PPM with more than one output products. Howeverm when there is demand for one product, the receipt for only that product should be generated. For example:
    Product A - Demand = 100
    Product B - Demand = 0
    Product C - Demand = 0
    When I run heuristic, I get a planned order of 100 for Product A which is good. But what i am also seeing that manufacture of products for Product B and Product C.
    Is there a way to prevent the creation of the manufacture of co-products eventhough the SNP PPM has more than one output components.
    Any ideas?
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi Virendar,
    Thanks for the input. But the flag you were suggesting wouldn't really help because all the products that are in PPM are output products and not components. As per my requirement,
    If
    Product A - Demand = 100
    Product B - Demand = 0
    Product C - Demand = 0
    I need a planned order for only product A and nothing for the other 2 products
    If
    Product A - Demand = 0
    Product B - Demand = 100
    Product C - Demand = 0
    I need a planned order for only product Band nothing for the other 2 products
    And so on and so forth.
    Thx

Maybe you are looking for

  • ICloud locked phone with no contact details.

    I have an iPhone with an iCloud account already logged in, the phone has been erased so I don't have an email to contact the owner through, the seller of the phone will not reply to any of my messages so I have no idea of how to fix this phone.

  • Restore Finder in OSX 10.8.5 after theme installation

    Dear all, My brother installed the Nocturne theme for osx, but what he did not realized is that it was for osx 10.9, I have on my iMAc osx 10.8.5. which got me really ******. http://aaronolive.deviantart.com/art/Nocturne-Theme-For-OS-X-10-9-x-3264533

  • Why do hard drives disappear off network?

    I have a PowerMac G5 with a number of external Firewire hard drives. One of them failed today so I had to turn it off. As soon as I did, the FW800 drive chain, including shared 1TB drive used as the home's iTunes library, are no longer visible on the

  • Massive problem with remote destination

    hello all, we have massive problems with our remote destinations. after i create the remote destination profile and added the line, i create the remote destination for my mobile phone.  all ok so. but if im associate my mobile phone with the line by

  • Implements Comparable error

    Hi, I've got code like that: import java.lang.Comparable; import java.util.*; * @author Adam public class Person implements Comparable { //this line causes error     /** Creates a new instance of Person */     public Person() {     }I've got also ano