SNP Network Heuristic - Purchase Requistion planned w/out source of supply
Dear Experts,
We have a T-lane setup from the source location A to destination B for a particular material. However, when running SNP Network heuristic, it generated SNP Purchase Requisition with out a source of supply. Can you please help me understand what would caused this?
Thank you so much for your input.
Tom.
Hi Satyajit,
My situation is we have two T-Lanes:
Tlane 1 - Source A Destination B
T lane 2 - Source B Destination A
I believe that in Network heuristic system does not allow any recursive T lane as it fails to determine low level code resulting no propagation of demand to next level. This resulted in no source of supply.
Can you please confirm if that is the limit of Network Heuristic? Our business scenario required to have recursive Tlane, is there a way to get Network Heuristic to work correct? How to setup low level code?
Thanks for all your help.
Tom
Similar Messages
-
SNP Network Heuristic and Location Heuristic
Hello Experts,
We've recently upgraded our APO sandbox landscape from SCM 4.1 to SCM 7.0.
Upon testing, I'm running into an issue where running the network heuristic will not create any planned production orders. However, if you run the location heuristic, planned orders will be generated.
What am I missing?
Thanks,
SusanHello Susan,
Please check if note 1502081 is implemented. If not, please apply.
I have seen this same issue for other companies and the note solved that, even with different description, but the code should
fix the issue.
Regards,
Michel Bohn -
The default value of purchasing group in "carry out Sourcing "
Dear , expert :
I work in SRM7.0 ,ECS!
I have two questions about the screen of "carry out Sourcing ":
1,How can set the default value of purchasing group ?Now the default is empty .
2.The purchaser can select many purchaser group here ,I want to know what controls this .in the group responsibility ?
Thanks!Hi Alex
If there are more purchase group responsible for one product category. the end user (requestor) can select which purchase group before he order a cart.
so that sc goes to respective purchaser cockpit in the sc ?
if you have only one purchase group responsible . no probem
or
redistribute workload
you can distribute your cart to another purchaser
for eg. initailly ALEX is purchase group in the sc.
now you can transfer MASA purchase group via redistribution workload
so now the sc shows in the MASA cockpit with new purchase group as MASA instead of ALEX purchase group name
br
muthu -
SNP Heuristics is not picking up contracts as source of supply
Hi Experts,
I have a strange situation here. I have integrated a vendor contract with APO, which has created an external procurement relationship and a valid transportation lane. When I create a receipt element manually through /n/sapapo/rrp3, the source of supply is determined rightly to this vendor and receipt is created.....but when I run location SNP heuristics interactively, system generates receipt element without any reference to this source of supply. Expectation is creation of receipt element with reference to vendor and contract...
System release is SCM 5.1 with ECC 6
Am I missing something?....please let me have your inputs...
Thanks and regards,
RaghavHi Aparna,
Thank you for your response.
I have checked the note, but it is applicable till SCM 500 SP 13. Our's is SCM 5.1 and this is inclusive I suppose. As per the SAP SCM standard documentation, external procurement relationship between vendor and receiving plant can be created through following 3 docuements:
1. Purchase infor record
2. Scheduling agreement
3. Contracts
Additionally, as per documentation, even source list between plant and vendors can be integrated by enabling the same through R/3 transaction 'CIFPUCUST01'.
I have worked with first two and SNP considers these for source determination. When I tried to integrate the contract, though it is creating TL between 'vendor --> receiving plant' and an active external procurement relationship, SNP is not found considering this for source determination. When I tried to use the source list for creating TL and esternal procurement relationship, the same is not creating any.
What type of contracts can be used for SNP planning and what else required to be done for integrating source list? I have enabled source list in R/3 material master. Source list is maintained as 'MRP relevant' in R/3.
Thanks and regards,
Raghav -
Report to redetermine SNP Source of supply
We configured Planned Order integration model to show up R/3 planned orders as SNP Planned orders in APO. However when the planners on R/3 side intervene the orders in terms of some of the fields, it passes on to APO as a planned order without source of supply. This is due to the design, the PPM information is manually maintained in APO and is out of sync with the information in R/3 side. The system thus chooses to keep a blank source of supply for the orders rather than redetermining the source of supply in APO. From some of my recollections, I understand that there are ways to run a report in APO that redetermines source of supply for planned orders with blank source. Can someone pass on this report information to me ? (We do not want to run user exits/BADIs to do this determination, and rather would prefer a standard report)
It is by design that PPM is not synced. There are tens of resources in R/3 side which we have summarized and kept as a "aggregate" resource data in APO manually. So there is no point in deleting APO orders and re-CIFing. It is by design that the orders come into APO without source of supply. Some of these orders are NOT solver dependent and is manully managed by planners in R/3 side. So we do not want to run the solver to change that data. We just want the PPM to be picked up in APO so that we can correctly load the resources.
If anyone has a Z program for this, it will be great if it can shared. -
Planned order and Purchase requistion both is generating in MRP
Dear All,
At the time of MRP explosion for Finished material, system is generating Planned order and purchase requistion, both, for detailed material, (e.g. the BOM is a single level BOM). Whereas, I want to generate Purchase requistion for all. I am not getting that for which logic it generating Planned order as well as purchase requisition.
Pl. explain.
Thanks,
Prasun.Hi Prasun
The procurement proposal indicator dependes on the procurement type assigned in material master. If you assign prod Type F it will automatically generate PR. If the procurement type is E or X the system will generate plan order .
This configured in Plan order type LA means it should be for in house production E.
There are two ways of solving this. If you want always PR for FERT. Assign Proc type F in material master MRP view. It will always generate PR for that particular material.
Or
You can run MRP with planning mode 3 create PR in front screen.
Regards
J . Saravan -
Planned order to purchase requistion
Dear gurus,
I have configured the purchase requsition number ranges.While running MRP and while making manual purchase requistions i am getting the correct number range.but my pblm is while converting planned order to purchase requistion.i am getting the different number range.i checked in omi3.it is client specific number range.My requirement is in corresponding plant if i convert planned order to purchase req i should get the same number range as of mrp generated prs in that plant.
Gurus please through some light
-gunaHi,
Goto tcode OPPQ , select your plant .
Select the number range field. Here you can find pur. req.
Check this no range by selecting display icon.
If the no range is different goto tcode OMI2 (for planning run)not OMI3 (manual), change your no range.
Now run mrp & check the no. range.
Regards,
Dharma -
Purchase Requistion,Purchase Enquiry, Sales Enquiry,Capacity Planning & Sch
Hi All,
I am working in SAP business One for quiet long time as Functional Consultant and i am very much aware with its design. And Now SAP is bringing SAP HANA also for Mid Size Company or you can say in SAP Business One.
BUT ...............
In any industry vertical there is always requirement of Purchase Requistion (Department Wise) , Purchase Enquiry and sales enquiry is Must to buy or sell the Item.
Why dont SAP is providing three different FORMS like sales Quotation , (Sales Enquiry) , Purchase Quotation (Purchase Enquiry) and Material Indent or Purchase Requisition (Dept. Wise) This i am spcifically asking just because the requestor doesn't knnow the Suppliers Name.
And This functionality is in SAP ECC .
This will reduce ADD ON
MRP is enhanced so beautifully in Latest Version but only Capacity Planning & Sceduling is Missing.
Capacity Planing and Sceduling if possible then I think Maximum Industry accross the World will consider SAP Business One
I hope by this forum i am Just Pointing this. So that we can get in near future
If anyone gets any clue on this please let me know.
Please Join hands if this feature what i discussed is really required .
Thanks & Regards
Ashish GupteHello Friend,
I am very much agree with your suggestion
But every one know that ECC is not for SMB sector so it is full flesh ERP compare SAP Business one and may be these form will part of SAP business one road map.
Because SAP has added some rich process for MRP but after get suggestion from form and these link form http://forums.sdn.sap.com/forum.jspa?forumID=265&start=0
and these given above link also is a good place for your question
Thanks
Manvendra Singh Niranjan -
Background Network Heuristic planned for component which it should not be
Hello Expert,
I ran a Network Heuristic in the background without selecting the option "Take into account found components in planning run". However, when the job completed, I review the log and it showed that the components also being planned as well.
Looks like the background planned for components regardless of this option check or not. Please advise
Thanks,
TomHi,
You mean to say that system fully plans the components with or without setting the indicator "Take into account ........".
To me behaviour expected may be as below with additional setting of u201CNet Change planning u201C
Without setting the indicator( "Take into account ......") , System may be only exploding the dependent demand for a BOM level in the first production location found in the planning direction. The dependent demand may be neither covered nor to be propogated further by the supply chain.
With setting indicator, the dependent demands are expected to be covered and furter propogation.
Regards
Datta -
Purchase Requistion item is not showing deleted.
CJ20N............we have deleted the material from the network for purchase requsition......... but that items is not shown deleted in purchase requisition in ME52N....
Line item in p. req. change mode has been greyed out......and not showing deleted........
Plz. help..........
Rgds,
NavinHi Naveen ,
Sometimes inconsistencies do occur in the database tables .
for your issue in question , you can go to SE38 Transaction and type in the Program name
RLORD035 and test .
--- Correction Rpt : Inconsistancy in Purchase Req. Deletion Indic./ Order
Enter the Purchase Requistion No. in question and you can run that in test mode .
Any inconsistancies will be shown and you can execute the actual run , ticking the checkbox " Set Deletion Indicator "
Hope that helps .
Kish -
Differentiate between SNP Deployment generated Purchase Requisition in R/3
Hi
We are implementing SNP with Deployment. Purchase Requisitions are being generated from both SNP Heuristic run and Deployment heuristic run and they are transferred to R/3. So using TC MD04 in R/3, we can see both Purchase Requistion coming from the same requirement. We want to convert the Purchase Requisition generated from Deployment to Purchase Order using ME59/ ME59N in the background. Currently, there is no difference between both PReqs in R/3, so system is incorrectly picking up both the PReqs.
It will be great help if anyone can suggest a way to differentiate them in R/3.
Thanks,
PrasunYou can identify PR by category
Category :
EA SNP: PReq SNP: Purchase requisition
EF DEP: PReq Deployment: Purchase requisition
you can use user exit APOCF013 on APO side to put some flag for SNP PR and use the same in R/3.
You need to identify one field in PR data that you can use in R/3 to identify SNP or DEP PR and by user exit you can put flag in that field .
Hope it will help you further.
Manish -
BAPI_POSRVAPS_GETLIST3 not returing purchase requistion
HI ,
I am using this BAPI :
BAPI_POSRVAPS_GETLIST3 to extract Purchase requistion creared by SNP forecast. On the basis of product and location.
but it is not returning any thing , i have tried every thing. please help me out.
parameters passed :
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_POSRVAPS_GETLIST3'
EXPORTING
logical_system = G_LOGSYS APO system
* START_TIME =
* END_TIME =
* EXCLUDE_EXPORT_FLAGS =
* MAX_NUMBER_OF_ORDERS =
* TRANSFER_MODE =
PLNG_VERSION = '000'
IO_NODE_SELECTION = 'O'
* IMPORTING
* NUMBER_OF_ORDERS = 0
TABLES
PRODUCT_SELECTION = it_p_s[]
LOCATION_SELECTION = it_l_s[]
* LOCTYPE_SELECTION =
* ORDER_SELECTION =
ORDERTYPE_SELECTION = it_ot_s[] Order type 1 for PR
* PRODUCT_LOCATION_KEYS =
* ATPCAT_SELECTION =
* ORDER_GUIDS =
* ORDER_KEYS =
* CFG_SELECTION =
RECEIPTS = it_recp[]
REQUIREMENTS = it_requ[]
PEGGING_INPUT_NODES = it_peg_in[]
PEGGING_OUTPUT_NODES = it_peg_out[]
* VENDOR_SELECTION =
* CFG_HEADERS =
* CFG_INSTANCES =
* CFG_PART_OF =
* CFG_VALUES =
* CFG_VAR_KEYS =
* CFG_BLOB =
RETURN = f_return
* EXTENSION_IN =
* EXTENSION_OUT =Hi Dutta,
Thanks for quick reply.
The ATP category at L2 is EF. and SCM version is 'SAP SCM 7.0'
Even though I provide ATP category as input I am unable to receive any o/p also not receiving any error.
Thanks & Regards,
Manali -
Source of Supply for SNP Planned Order
Hi All,
I have a situation where we are feeding SNP planned orders using /sapapo/lcin (Time series to Order Network). When we use this transaction SNP planned orders are created in SNP but PDS is not attached to such orders. I would like to know how can I get PDSs attached to SNP planned orders created?
Regards,
Harshil DesaiThanks for reply Nandha,
PDS is active & Valid also SNP planned order indicator is set. Just to clarify that planned orders are not created by SNP. We are creating planned orders using /sapapo/lcin (Time series to Order Network) transaction.
Regards,
Harshil Desai -
The relationship between production order and purchase requistion After running MPS
Dear Experts:
I met a issue . My users want to know the relationship between production order and purchase requistion . In my company we create production order and purchase req. by running MRP. our operations are:
1. T-CODE: MD41 create planned order .
2. T-CODE: CO41 convert planned order to production order .
3. T-CODE: MD15 convert planned order to purchase Requisition.
but I can't find the relation of them. would you like to give me some advices? thank you very much.Hello
On the standard MTS process there is no link between the requirement (STO) and the replenishment element (production order).
See the below extraction from note 12955:
There is no index that the system could use to determine which issue element (sales order, planning, reservation, dependent requirement, ...) is covered by a certain receipt element (purchase order, production order, purchase requisition, planned order, stock level ...).
A production order, for example, can be created to cover several different requirements, even when you are using lot sizing procedure EX.
You can use transaction MD09 or MD04to determine the pegged requirements, but they are calculated dynamically and there is not fixed link between requirement and receipt.
BR
Caetano -
Hi all,
PS allows to manage sales invoice plan using milestone. Is there any object I can use to manage in the same way a purchase invoice plan directly in PS?
Thanks a lot.Hi,
In SPRO>PS>Costs->Planned cost->Automatic costing in network and activities--->Maintian settings for invoicing plan.
In CJ20N,
Select the externally procured material, Then
Edit->Component--->Invoicing Plan
Hope its useful.
Reward points if useful.
Thanks..
Maybe you are looking for
-
Pages 5.1 deletes "objects" in table cells. Is there any way to prevent this?
I have been using Pages 4.3 and updated to Maverick; downloaded Pages 5.1, and now when I want to open previous documents the pages app doesn't support certain functions. For example I had a table of images and information related to them, and it is
-
PI 7.1: Importing a wsdl file with references to other xsd files
Hi Experts, I am trying to import a wsdl file that has got references to other xsd files. When i do this with SOAP UI, i can get the full message structure for the other xsd files. But when i try to import the same wsdl in the ESR, i only get to the
-
Multi-Cam Playback Won't Stop!
Premiere Pro Multi-Cam playback once started by any method will not stop. I have to kill Premiere and restart it to get back control of the software. I saw a video on YouTube of someone with the same problem. I think they referred to the issue as
-
Converting numeric level identifier into Parent/Child format to load.
I am unable to receive meta data in parent child format from a ERP source system and need to load these into Planning through ODI. Each member is identified with a numeric level indicator. Is there any wasy to convert this into Parent/Child format us
-
Reg: calling selection screen from the second list
Hi all, How can we call the selection screen from the second screen. Can any one help me to solve this problem.