SNP planned order deleted in APO, but not in R/3.

OK Guru's,
We have a situation where during the weekend SNP planning runs, SNP Planned orders are deleted in APO, but the order is never deleted in R/3.  The change pointer is not in CPP and there are no failed queues.  Also, when you run CCR on planned orders, we will get an error on some orders saying "Not in APO" and the only option to reconcile that order is to "Send to APO".  The option that should exist is "delete in R/3" becuase the deletion never occured in R/3.
If you send the order back to APO, the order will show in the "Production Confirmed" line of the Planning Book.  This is because APO is thinking that this order is an order that was created in R/3 when in fact is it really is a SNP planned order.
Any clues to why this would happen?
thanks,
Brian

How are you getting the SNP Planned Orders to R/3 in the first place.
If you are transferring them using /SAPAPO/RRP7 then I guesss its a manual transfer and system does not consider SNP Planned Order deletion flag relevant for transfer to R/3.
You will need to look into CIF enhancement to send the deletions to R/3.
Normally SNP Planned Orders are not relevant for transfer to R/3 unless its replaced or converted to a PPDS planned order.
Somnath

Similar Messages

  • Past due PurRqs are getting deleted in APO but not getting deletd in R3

    Hi folks,
    We have a daily job, which runs at 18:00 hrs in the evening everyday in the APO Production System.The job is to delete all past due Purchase Requisitions for last 2 years (job & variant details are mentioned below) All the past due PurRqs are getting deleted from APO, which we have cross-cheked in RRP3 view many times.
    However the same is not getting deleted in R3 systems. The planner/end- user is getting confused & hassled by this list of old PurRqs which is visible in R3 through MD04 t-code.
    Please suggest remedial/corrective actions to get this issue sorted.
    The job details for the deletion of past purchase requisitions.
    The job is run with the following variant details:
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    ABAP Program name :/SAPAPO/RLCDELETE
    VARIANT Details
    Select Object-> By Categories ->Category = AG (PurRqs in R3)
    Manual Selection-> Version =000; Product = (blank); Location = List ofall locations;
    Fixed Order (ticked)
    Period = 14.03.2009 to 14.03.2011 {All PurRqs in these period shouldget deleted in APO as well as R3}
    Settings-> Delete Transaction Data ->In R3 & APO (ticked)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Past due PurRqs are not getting deleted in R3 systems. The planner/end-user is getting confused & hassled resulting in loss of productive time & generation of erroneous planning which is negatively impacting Business.
    Pls suggest some remedy for this.
    MMTIA
    Kumar
    Edited by: Blue Lotus on Mar 14, 2011 5:51 PM

    Do you run the CCR on a daily basis. If so do you see the "reqs missing in R/3" in the CCR ?
    Also what is your transfer setting ? Meaning the transfer from APO to R/3 configuration  - is it immediate or change pointer based ? check that also
    Thanks
    Aparna

  • SNP Planned order not following resource bucket capacity/factory calendar

    Hi gurus,
    SCM 5.0
    I am running SNP heuristics for a product and expecting planned orders for it.  It has corresponding production data structure and multimixed resource.  The resource has an assignd factory calendar and SNP bucket capacity.  The bucket capactiy availablity dates of the resouce is consistent with the factory calendar workdays/holidays.  Using simple lot for lot strategy, I am expecting heuristics to schedule the planned orders on the dates of the demand in compliance with teh SNP bucket capacity availability of the resource.  APO does not schedule on holidays consistent with bucket capactiy.  This is true until...
    We have a public holiday in factory calendar that needs to become a workday. To remedy this, we put a special rule for the factory calendar and explicitly made that holiday into a workday.  The changes were synchronized with APO, and this is also reflected in the bucket capacity of the resourc: former holiday now has bucket capacity after the calendar change.  However, when running heuristics, it still does not create SNP planned order on that former holiday that has been changed into workday.  Even if it is a public holiday, there is already a special rule for the factory calendar and the resource bucket capacity reflects this correctly. But SNP heuristics seems not to follow this change.
    Any ideas on this? looks like a bug.

    Hi Edgar,
    Yes, when your resource reflects the addional capacity of the holiday turned working day, then it is expected to be considered for the SNP planned order.
    Instead of SNP heuristics, you may try to check interactively in SNP planning book, if manual order creation in the bucket works out.
    Since this is a mutlimix  resource , it can also be checked if in PPDS planned order can be created on the day.
    The above checking may not solve your problem , but will get to know if at least manully the bucket is being considered or not.
    regards
    Datta

  • Planned Orders Confirmed In R/3 not changing in APO

    We have planned production orders in APO, with order category of EE, that get CIF'd to R/3. In our planning books they show in the production planned row. When the planned orders are confirmed in R/3, the planned orders continue to show as order category of EE in APO instead of being marked as confirmed, category AJ. When planned orders are created in R/3 they come over as AJ orders but when they originate in APO they stay as EE orders. What can we do to get the planned orders to show in the production confirmed row of the planning books in APO?

    Hello Harish and Somnath -
    Here is the actual and complete scenario. APO is integrated with Repetitive manufacturing in R/3.
    SNP Heuristic creates SNP Planned Orders(Category EE). These planned orders are CIF'fed to R/3 and are used by REM. The order type in REM for these orders is PE. Meaning these kind of orders cannot be converted into a production order.There is no conversion of orders or confirming of orders in R/3. The only thing that is done on these orders are they are "scheduled" and even after they are scheduled the order type remains PE and does not change. R/3 folks are not concerned anymore since they see 2) a new tab on the order which gives them the scheduling information.
    I have tried out the option of creating a new category group by copying the existing category group FP1( which already contains AJ) and adding EE and assigning this Category group to the confirmed production KF but it did not work. I am assuming since PE did not change in R/3 , no changes have been CIF'fed to APO.
    Just to summarize the requirement here:
    1) EE orders are created in SNP( Planned Production 9APPROD Key figure) and CIFfed to R/3 and show up as PE orders in R/3 --this works fine since its standard behavior.
    2) But as soon as these PE order is scheduled, the order qty should move from Planned production KF to Confirmed production KF 9AFPROD.
    Hope this is clear and will appreciate any inputs. I just started looking at this problem today and will post as soon as I fix it. Please let me know if you need any further info.
    Thanks a ton!
    Varun

  • Delete SNP Planned Order to reflect at R3 (C5 or CCR)

    Hi,
    I deleted some SNP planned order using rlcdel, should i use a C5 or CCR to transfer to deletion toR3 to reflect the changes . ? what situation should i used C5  or CC5
    many thanks

    Hi,
                     RLCDELETE has the radio buttons "In APO" and "In APO and R/3". if you check the "In APO and R/3", the deletion is immediately sent to R/3. No need to run C5. If not then you just deleted the order only in APO and did not delete in R/3. You can either run C5 and select the change pointer with "R"- delete or run CCR report or delete these orders manually in MD16 in R/3.
    what situation should i used C5 or CC5
    C5: When you sent periodic transfer in SPRO, then create an order and push it to R/3. You can also delete an order and push the delete change pointer (R) to R/3
    CCR: When the orders in APO and R/3 donot match.

  • SNP planned order availability date difference between APO and ECC

    Hi,
    I have observed that SNP Planned order availability date is not matching between APO and ECC. Details are as follows.
    I ran SNP Optimizer with bucket offset of 0.5. After publishing the optimizer created planned orders to ECC, only start date is matching.
    Example:
    I am using PDS as a source of supply.
    Fixed production activity in SNP PDS is 1 day.
    GR processing time: 3 day
    After running optimizer planned order is created with dates explained below.
    Start date/time: 09.05.2011 00:00:00
    End date/time: 12.05.2011 23:59:59
    Availability date: 16.05.2011 00:00:00
    Because of bucket offset defined as 0.5 optimizer planned order availability is start of next monday.
    After publishing this planned order to ECC dates on the planned order is as follows.
    Start date: 09.05.2011
    End date: 09.05.2011
    Availability date: 12.05.2011
    I have not maintained any scheduling margin key in ECC. Also if I dont define the GR processing time, planned dates between APO and ECC always match. Can anyone explain the impact of GR time on the availability date.
    Regards,
    Venkat

    Hi Venkadesh,
    What's "state stamp"? Do you mean different time zone?
    note : 645597  mentioned by Nandha is very helpful:
    In standard, CCR will use duedate - "the available date of the output product".
    Nandha's words "In SAP APO, if the receipt date of the primary product deviates from the
    end date of the last activity of the order, the receipt date
    always identifies this as inconsistent. You cannot rectify
    inconsistencies of this type by using CCR."
    I guess in your PDS or PPM, the output product is not assigned to the End of the last activity. Someone changed it?
    Please CIF the PDS or PPM again.
    If you really want to apply a note, please use note 815509 as you're using planned order,
    and system will use order end  date in CCR instead.
    GR time is always considered. BR/Tiemin

  • SAP APO SNP planned order

    Hi,
    I am basically from PP background and just started working in APO SNP. after running SNP optimzer,not able to see the operation details in SNP planned order ( SNP planned order has only receipts, requirements ). could you please help me how to get operation details in SNP planned order.
    Thanks
    Krishna.

    Hi,
    SNP Planned Order:
    1 . SNP Planned Orders wil give details about Order start date and finish date .
    2.  During  SNP Planned Order creation a basic scheduling will happen.
    PPDS Planned Order
    1.  PPDS Planned Orders will give details about when the actual production is start and finish.
    2.  During PPDS Planned creation the Machine time details defined in the routing routing or recepie will be take into account.
    3.  Leadtime scheduling will be carried out to calculate the exact production start date and finish date.
    Thanks,
    nandha

  • Deletion and creation of SNP Planned order

    Hi,
    I need to delete the SNP Planned order i.e ATP category of type 'EE' and I have to create the orders of ATP category EE  through programetically. Please let me know if any BAPI's or Function modules are existed for the same.
    Appriciate your help.
    Regards,
    Ratna

    Hi Ratna.
    To delete orders in SNP use transaction:
    /SAPAPO/RLCDEL
    BAPI to create planned orders:
    BAPI_MOSRVAPS_SAVEMULTI3
    There is also a BAPI to delete planned orders if this is more suitable.
    BAPI_MOSRVAPS_DELEMULTI
    Hope this helps, M

  • SNP Planned order start and end dates are not calculated correctly

    Hello SNP Guru's
    The SNP planned orders generated after the Heuristics run, have a start and end date based on the Activity Duration (Fixed), while the resource consumption is based on the Bucket Consumption (Variable), which is correct.
    The Activity Duration (Fixed) is based on the BOM Base Quantity. So if the Activity Duration = 1 day, and if the order quantity is more than a day, the start and end dates, still shows as 1 day. So no matter what is the order quantity, the start and end dates is always = 1 day.
    Does anyone have any experience in implementing any code to change the start and end dates on SNP Planned Order?
    Seems like it should work as standard.
    Am i missing something?
    Thanks,
    Mangesh

    Dear Mangesh,
    SNP is a infinite planning tool. If you have defined fixed duration to be 1 DAY in the activity, no matter how many quantity you input for your planned order, the order will last for one day. If the resourced is overloaded, you then run capacity levelling to
    banlance the capacity. What your expected beahavior happens in PPDS planning.
    Claire

  • How to Change Component on a SNP Planned Order ( Just 1 time )

    Hello,
    We are trying to change a component on a SNP Planned Order just 1 time.
    So we do not want to change the PDS since this is one time change only.
    We tried changing it in R/3. Once we do that, R/3 shows new component but APO still shows dependant demand on old component ( May be because APO SNP Planned order is still connected with the PDS ) .
    Then we went to APO and tried to change the component in /sapapo/rrp3. Here you can delete the old component but doesn't let me add new component.
    Next thing we tried was to convert it to PPDS Order. Once converted, we went to change mode and tried to remove old component and add new component. It lets me do this. Only issue with this route is that, it puts correct start and end dates on the order dependning on the order quantity and so order moves the dates which we do not like.
    Is there any other better way to fix this issue ?.
    Thanks.
    Ketan Doshi.

    This being a very unique requirement, I would use one-off approaches usually not followed. You may need to explore the use of BAPI BAPI_MOSRVAPS_CREATESNPORDER. This will help you point the source of planned order to a PPM or a PDS that you may want to create in APO system on a one-off basis. PPMs can be maintained in APO, however PDS are usually CIFed from R3. You can try to create PDS (based on the new component) in APO system only using backend tables. Try do some little research on /sapapo/curto tables to create the PDS in APO. Then use the BAPI to point the source to this new PDS. (better you also try the PPM approach since there are no issues keeping the PPM in APO)

  • SNP Planned order error

    Hi,
    During the immediate transfer of the SNP planned orders after the planning run, some orders are not moved immediately, they went to R3 during the next snp run in the background.
    do you know any reason for this?
    Thanks,
    Dhanush

    Hi Dhanush
    To answer your query in block size, the block size can be maintained in customizing settings. You can navigate with the following navigation path
    SPRO --> Integration visa APO Core INterface --> Basic Settings for data transfer --> Publication --> Manitain Object Specific Settings
    You can define an optimum block size for both external procurement and In house Production. But before you do that I would request first check if there any queue blcoks exisitng which are preventng the smooth flow of data from APO to ECC. You check this through /sapapo/cq transaction. Depending upon how you have queue set up (inbound/outbound), you can select the apprpriate drill down and see if any queue blcoks exist. If you can afford to delete the queue blocks, then please delete them and then run heursitcs again.
    Also in your intial part of the query you have mentioned that the planned orders are not getting transferred. However in the latter part you are refering to purchase requistions. Are you facing problem with both the types of transaction data?
    Rgds, Sandeep

  • To build query related to SNP: Planned Order

    Hi,
    System: SCM 5.0
    Scenario: SO received at plant and planning creates PR against SO at plant and accordingly SNP:Planned Order at Vendor location. If SO is cancelled/deleted (manually), sometime only the PR gets cancelled/deleted (automatically during planning run) but corresponding SNP:Planned Orders still remains at vendor location and so the dependent requirements. PR and Planned Orders are pegged to SO so one-to-one relation is maintained.
    I could not find any reason why system is not deleting Planned Order at vendor location despite SO and PR is deleted at plant location. So I am planning to build query where SNP:Planned Orders are not pegged to any PR or SO.
    Can anyone help with list of SNP:Planned Order tables so that I can build query around it to identify ghost Planned Orders.
    Hope I was clear with my query but let me know if any further information is require.
    Thanks and regards,
    Devang

    HI Marius,
    Sorry for delay reply.
    I was working on on some other more critical issues to business.
    Finally we decided to built report to identify obsolete Planned Orders for which PR is not available in ordering plant. I have listed below logic for that report:
    Get Location ID from table /SAPAPO/LOC based on Location entered in selection screen
    Get PEGIDs from FM /SAPAPO/DM_MATLOC_GET_PEGIDS based on IV_SIMID as 000 and location id from step 1
    In FM /SAPAPO/OM_PEG_CAT_GET_ORDERS, use SIMVERSION as 000 and in Import Para IS_GEN_PARAMS insert all PEGIDs from step 2.
    From Export Para ET_PEG_INPNODE take From_OrderID and store in internal table.
    Execute T.Code /SAPAPO/RRP4 with following selection (Use Selection Variant: OBSOLETE PR and add Location as entered in Selection Screen)
    Planning Version: 000
    From: Current date – 60 days
    To: Current date +180 days
    Location: 0000201328
    Product: *
    Order Type: 1F
        6. Compare output of step 4 and step 5 and display result.
    From FM /SAPAPO/DM_MATLOC_GET_PEGIDS the output (step 4) will be Order ID (22 characters) while step 5 (T.Code /SAPAPO/RRP4) will give Planned Order number (8 character). I am not sure how to compare Internal Order ID (22 characters) for corresponding Planned Order Nos. (8 characters).
    I have not marked your post as correct answer as still need to find answer of above query.
    Thank you in advance for your guidance.
    Regards,
    Devang Shah

  • SNP Planned Order Date

    Hi Experts,
    May I ask for your help. I have a gr processing time of 1 and In-house production of 1 day as well. But whenever I run heuristic, it results in 4 days from start date to availability date. Say April 16 start date and availability date is April 20. Are there other factors on how this is computed?really hoping for a reply from you.
    Thanks! Sincerely, Ria

    Hello Ria,
    Have you maintained any GR time in ECC?
    I faced a similar issue (in PPDS order though) in which it was computing the availability date
    first based on the GR processing time maintained in APO, when the order goes to ECC it would pick up the GR processing time maintained in ECC, and move the availability date of the order in APO.
    We are working on code to stop this transfer back to APO.
    Note 508993 gives more details about the FM.
    You may try an option to stop the transfer from SAP R/3 since you are working with SNP planned orders:
    https://help.sap.com/saphelp_scm50/helpdata/en/80/e8bc0f629af14db213108bb6fa7515/content.htm?frameset=/en/b3/32c5d32970834dadf53cac0aa2b5b4/frameset.htm&current_toc=/en/9b/954d3baf755b67e10000000a114084/plain.htm&node_id=147
    Hope this helps you!
    Regards,
    Subhash

  • SNP Planned order - Doesnt get the complete BOM when CIFd to ECC

    Hello,
    When we create SNP Planned order in APO and sent to ECC, the Planned order doesn’t get the complete BOM, it works for the most part, except if we have Materials from multiple plants within the same BOM (sourcing from multiple plants).
    Do we have to do any separate Configuration for this scenario?
    We are planning only the End item in SNP, and we are generating the production version and PDS transfer to APO. We are not transferring all the materials to APO.
    if we go to the Change mode of the Planned order in ECC and re-explode the BOM, I get all the components from the BOM, its just that when the planned order gets created thru the CIF we have this issue.
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Regards
    Gk

    Hello Marius
    Thank you for your quick response.
    I looked at the SAP note you mentioned, the description seems to be matching with the issue we are having. Recently we had SNC implemented, and the note states that that can be the case why the components are getting deleted during planned order creation.
    The only thing about this note is its very old, and we are having the SAP 6.0 and SCM 7.2 ,
    Do you think this would be still applicable.
    I will look into the details and let you know whether the note is applicable for us.
    Regards
    Gk

  • Bapi for sfg dependent dem,snp planned order qty, and ppds planned orde qty

    Hi Gurus,
    I am not much familiar with APO, so please help me,
    Input details:
    Field                         Value     
    Planning Version     000     
    Source Location *     1001     Single/Multi Value
    Product *                          1000061     Single/Multi Value
    Production Planner *     PRC     Single/Multi Value
    Start Date *          
    End Date *          
    o/p:
    Source Location     Date     Semi-Finished Material     Material Description     SFG Dependent Demand     SNP Planned Orders qty     PPDS Planned order Qty     Total SFG Variance due to Lot size     Total SFG Variance reference to dependent demand
    1001     15-Jul-10     1000041PP     PRIMARY FF MILK  3% FAT     340     412     420     8     80
    1001     15-Jul-10     1000041PP     PRIMARY FF MILK  3% FAT                         
    1001     15-Jul-10     1000041PP     PRIMARY FF MILK  3% FAT                         
    Is there any bapi to fetch the data as shown in o/p.
    Thanks

    Hi Phani,
    Tryout the below BAPIs
    IF10503 (object)
    BUS10503
    Regards
    R. Senthil Mareeswaran.

Maybe you are looking for

  • How can I set up a ranking question on a survey?

    How can I set up a ranking question on a survey?  It allows you to rate something but I need to rank something.

  • Losing Bold Format in Framemaker 10

    Hello, I have been having a problem with the format of my headings, footers and logos losing the bold appearance in Framemaker 10. When the document was created according to our EDD, template and paragraph designer, certain Headings were defined as B

  • ** How to send 2 IDocs DEBMAS06, ADRMAS03 only if both contains data?

    Hi Friends, My scenario is like below. Whenever create a new customer or change an existing customer (XD01/XD02), we distributes the IDoc DEBMAS06 & ADRMAS03 from one SAP system to other SAP system through XI. The present scenario  is if DEBMAS06 IDo

  • OnJobDone does not triggered??

    Hi, I use Adobe Acrobat Distiller 7 and C# 2.0. I must distinct each PDF jobs because I need to further save the generated document to database. It works okay in normal cases, but sometimes when the PC gets slow, then the PDF is not generated before

  • Lost dimension for no apparend reason

    Hi all, for no apparend reason we sometimes lose the content of a dimension in SAP BPC. The admin consolle of SAP BPC can't find the members of the dimension, but the data is still in the SQL database. In the user front end of SAP BPC the current vie