So is anyone doing video conferencing over 3-4G?

My DSL is horrible 1Mdown 380K Up and considering going to mobile because of speeds.   My question would be around latency and jitter.
Thanks

Hi bahamamills, welcome to the community. Are you asking about speed? With 3G, download speed average  600 Kbps - 1.4 Mbps,  upload  500 - 800 Kbps. 
4G average download speed is 2 to 5 Mbps, upload 5 to 12 Mbps and average latency 30ms. Keep in mind a latency below 50ms is equal to wireline connections.  
You can confirm coverage in your area at www.verizonwireless.com/coveragelocator
To read more about our 4G network go to www.verizonwireless.com/4g
We do have great 3G coverage in Bahamas, NC and a 14-day trial period so you can try the service yourself without any obligation.
Thanks. Have a great evening!

Similar Messages

  • Video conferencing over LAN

    I want to do a project on video conferencing over LAN .Plz help me
    for implementation.

    Have you tried AVTransmit2 and AVReceive2 to transmit multicast stream. then have multiple receivers join and disconnect.
    It works without any code modification, so I would study the differences between that and yours.
    I think I asked this before, are you transmitting multisession?? and receive multisession??
    Are you using linux by chance?

  • Video Conferencing over VSAT Link ?

    Hi,
    Is it possible to have a video conferencing using 2921 CME 8.6 router and 9951 video IP Phone over VSAT Link ?
    If yes then what should be the max latency that is acceptable ? What should be the bandwidth ?
    Plz help me out with this.
    Regards,
    Gaurav

    bandwidth should be at least 384k or 512k

  • Video Conferencing over Low speed WAN links

    Hi there,
    Can somebody explain possible point-to-nultipoint video conferencing solution over low speed WAN links ?
    ( I have central site and about 20 remote sites - hub and spoke configuraition)
    a. What is the minimum BW requirement
    b. If using Cisco Video advantage at users desktop how do we select the proper MCU at the central site ?

    Buffer 15 to 30 seconds. Make sure to tell them there will be
    a long load time. There really isn't much you can do besides
    that.

  • Does Video Conferencing use multicast?

    We want to enable vide conferencing between multiple remote sites, however, our providers backbone does not support multicast traffic.
    The question I have is if I have 2 users in Boston, 2 in NYC and 2 in SF for video conferencing, is the traffic output from a MCU a multicast or unicast to the remote sites?
    This is with the MCU at the NYC location.

    H.323 uses unicast traffic. Some vtc endpoints are also capavle of generation a mutlicats video stream, but that is not a part of the H.323 feature set. Multicast is not supported on the public internet, and very few if any providers are going to allow it on their backbone.

  • Video Conferencing over IP

    Hi,
    My customer has cucm8.x, cups 8.x and Unity 8.x in a centralized call processing with 5 remote sites in total connected via MPLS. They are interested in a video conferencing solution for boardroom and desktop.
    What cisco solution (hardware and software) should I be looking at to satisfy this need. I need to make a presentation tomorrow, assistance is much appreciated. In the board room they would like to use their LCD TV as well for picture display or any other alternative. Not telepresence, too pricy for their requirement
    Nki

    Well, you may not care any more since you have presented you may have already presented your solution....
    Anyway, Cisco TelePresence no longer refers to the high-end "immersive telepresence" product line. Cisco has decided that TelePresence is a brand not a product. This brand now includes hardware and software that have been absorbed in the Cisco portfolio as a result of the Tandberg acquisition.
    So, don't let the term TelePresence in a Cisco doc throw you off.
    Cisco has plenty of video options in their portfolio now, go here:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/ps7060/products.html
    HTH.
    Regards,
    Bill

  • Video Conferencing over LAN's

    Hi,
    I would like to set up video conferencing for our company. Ideally we are looking for the ability for internal users to use CUVA with their IP Phones (which they can currently do), with the ability for other companies to also connect - I'm guessing through a gateway device. Multiparty conferences are required. We also have a few Tandberg H.323 devices in meeting rooms which would be good to be included. What would be required for this setup? Is a Cisco Unified Videoconferencing 3515 Multipoint Control Unit (MCU) all that is required or is there additional requirements? Your thoughts, etc would be appreciated.

    bandwidth should be at least 384k or 512k

  • H323 Video conferencing over WAN

    We have the following setup for a pilot Videoconferencing project running over the WAN. The video quality in general is not satisfactory.
    1) Tandberg 880MXP registering to local gatekeeper. Another Tandberg 770MXP registering to the above gatekeeper.
    2) The 770 MXP is located in a remote office, connected via a VPN link.
    3) The available bandwidth is 1.2M and the link is not used much for data or voip, so we get about 1M always for video.
    4) the WAN link is a ATM connection to the remote ISP, in the headquaters here the link bandwidth is 30M.
    5) The tandberg 880 and 770 are on separate internal subnets.
    Problem
    1) The video quality even with a 256k video call is average with lots of pixalation and some packet drops.
    2) The average delay is 40ms and avergae jitter is 8ms.
    3) The endpoints register about 8% video packet loss/drop.
    4) The call never drops, but constant packet loss occurs.
    5) An iperf test run over the same link, showed a consistent 1M bandwidth with 0.01% packet loss in general.
    We have tried various qos policies and also tried running without a VPN over GRE tunnel. But the quality is still unsatisfactory.
    Side notes:
    1) A call to other locations tends to be very good. Probably pinning the issue on the wan link. but we are unable to find the real cause.. especially with iperf tests working fine.
    Any help, leads or directions would be extremely helpful.
    Thanks
    Manish

    Hi,
    iperf only shows packet loss, while the the endpoints are suffering from late packets also.
    Are you doing qos pre-classification to mark the DSCP value in VPN outer header too ? That would give ISP a chance of applying some QoS to your video, at least they can be asked to do so.
    Hope this helos, please rate post if it does!

  • Is it possible to use a Cisco 2800 IOS H323 voice gateway for video conferencing over ISDN?

    I have seen this page and was wondering if what it says actually is possible and works? I also have got a CUCM 8.6 that I would like to use for call routing via my old 2600XM gatekeeper.
    http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios/12_4t/12_4t11/h320gw.html#wp1047659

    I have seen this page and was wondering if what it says actually is possible and works? I also have got a CUCM 8.6 that I would like to use for call routing via my old 2600XM gatekeeper.
    http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios/12_4t/12_4t11/h320gw.html#wp1047659

  • Video conferencing between CCM and CCME

    Hi,
    We are having CCM4.1(3)at central location.In branch location we are having CCME 4.0(2).Both the locations are connected through leased circuit. We enabled Video on IP Phone which is registered to CCM and also we configured CCME for video. When we start doing video conferencing between these two location, it's not happenning. In VT advantage it is showing local image on Local & Remote screen. I don't know what is the problem.
    Can you guys please tell me wheather Video Conferencing will work between CCM & CCME over the leased circuit using VT Advantage.
    If it works, please tell me what are configuration parameters i need to configure on CCM & CCME.
    Thanks & Regards

    By default all IP traffic is permitted through a VPN tunnel except broadcast and multicast traffic. It basically is a matter of how the video software you are using works. If it is a multicast application then it will not work through an ipsec tunnel, if it is a unicast application then it should be able to work.
    Also if this video is on the Internet tries to enable split tunnel on the VPN endpoint. Now if the issue is with a video that is on the PC, this might be because a software corruption of the OS, so try reinstalling the VPN Client software

  • Video Conferencing in internet--Proxy net Connection

    I am doing video conferencing project in internet....We are having internet connection in lan....Internet connection we are having only one line.....From that we are having proxy net connection to all systems.If i transmit video from outside (not in lan) to inside proxy net connected system means....what can i do ?will u please help in this matter?

    Hi Nivaz,
    We are facing the same problem now . Since you have posted this long back, you might have got a solution by now . Please share with us.
    Thanking you in advance
    Arun Kumar A P
    [email protected]

  • Ip tunneling --Video Conferencing

    I am doing video conferencing project...For systems behind firewall and proxy,
    i planned to use ip tunneling....But i am very new to this concept....Please help me how to do it.....please help me to find materials also

    Also cisco CCME support video conferencing using Cisco VT advantage or the videostation 7985. Interoperate with other vendor should not be a problem. It is a feature of IOS and runs on all the routers so you can chose from the 2801 and upward.
    Hope this helps, if so please rate post!

  • New video Conferencing project

    Hi, thanks to all in advance, I hope you can help, this the situation: My company just purchased a list of devices which include:
    IPVC-3515-MCU12
    CISCO2851
    IPVC-3527-GW1P
    Now, I have no experience with Video Services deployment, where do I start? what are the requirements if this needs to go over the internet to another site, what is involved in this? multicast, QoS, etc? and where can I get some white papers to begin with, thanks again.

    You need a very good bandwidth. It should not be less than 512 kbps. You have to enable the QoS and codecs.
    Implementing QoS Solutions for H.323 Video Conferencing over IP:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk543/tk757/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094968.shtml
    Take a look at the following link for basic gatekeeper concepts and configuration.
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk1077/technologies_tech_note09186a00800a8928.shtml
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk1077/technologies_configuration_example09186a00800a9a56.shtml

  • Anyone used VisionNet system "designed to provide real-time streaming video feeds over the Internet"?

    I'm a Mac user and we only have Macs at home. My son just started preschool, which offers a VisionNet system--"a state-of-the-art system of cameras, servers, and software designed to provide real-time streaming video feeds over the Internet." However, on the VisionNet FAQ page, it specifies the following:
    "You need a web browser that is Java-enabled, perferably Microsoft Internet Explorer.  If you're running Microsoft Internet Explorer, it needs to be version 6.x or higher.  We recommend Internet Explorer 6.x as this is the latest and most up-to-date product release.  Some Windows XP and Windows XP Professional users will have do download a Java runtime environment in order to use the VisionNet system if they have not done so already."
    We don't have any PCs at home, so I  tried to log in using my MacPro desktop, my old MacBook Pro and my new MBP. Basically, for the last 3 weeks I've managed to access the site only ONCE from my desktop and after the time-out session, I wasn't able to log on ever again (I just cannot enter any keys on the Username and Password fields at login). If I hit the Logon button from the FAQ page, I get an "Unauthorized Access" pop-up message: "This site may only be entered from an authorized web site! Please enter this site from your childcare provider's web site." When I enter "OK" I immediately get a pop-up menu "Confirm Dialog Preference. Prevent this page from creating additional dialogs" but I still can't enter any keys at login. It does nothing!
    The "support guy" has NO knowledge of Macs, so I don't know where else to go. The fact that I had successfully logged on once makes me believe it's something I have to update/delete/add in my Preferences in Firefox (I've used Safari and Chrome with no success). I've also considered purchasing an inexpensive PC just for this lousy VisionNet system  but I want to see if anyone has any ideas or advice.
    Can anyone please help me?   Thank you in advance!

    Here is a link to the finished PSA at Vimeo. It is not an outstanding production or anything too special, but it is worth noting that while some of the stills were doctored in Photoshop, the entirety of the editing and motion graphics were done in Premiere CS6.02; and the timeline playback was RealTime thanks to the MPE Hardware Acceleration and a GTX 560 2GB.
    DUI PSA
    Happy Editing.

  • Says my computer does not support video conferencing?

    Just recently whenever i tried to do video chats it tells me my computer does not support video conferencing? How can i fix this?

    In the Video Menu open the Connection Doctor and go to the Capabilities tab.
    This may give you more info about which things iChat currently thinks it can do and will tell you why It thinks it can not do certain things.
    If it says Low Bandwidth against some items you will need to do as Defcom says and alter the Quicktime > Streaming speed (System Preferences > Quicktime > Streaming) to 1.5Mbps and restart iChat to see the new Speed.
    Also check in iChat menu > Preferences > Video section that the Bandwidth Limit drop down is not set too low. (Ideally here it should be set to NONE unless you are Comcast or Road Runner) Certainly don't use 100kbps.
    8:50 PM Thursday; December 4, 2008

Maybe you are looking for